DOCSLIB.ORG

County of Riverside General Plan Jurupa Area Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
County of Riverside General Plan Jurupa Area Plan County of Riverside General Plan Jurupa Area Plan COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Transportation and Land Management Agency 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Riverside, CA 92501-3634 Phone: (951) 955-3200, Fax: (951) 955-1811 October 2011 County of Riverside General Plan Jurupa Area Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Vision Summary.......................................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 A Special Note on Implementing the Vision ........................................................................................................ 2 Location ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Features ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Setting ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Unique Features ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Santa Ana River ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Jurupa Mountains/Pyrite Canyon ......................................................................................................................... 8 Pedley Hills .......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Unique Communities ................................................................................................................................................ 8 Rubidoux .............................................................................................................................................................. 8 Sunnyslope ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 Belltown ............................................................................................................................................................... 8 Glen Avon ............................................................................................................................................................ 8 Indian Hills ........................................................................................................................................................... 9 Pedley ................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Mira Loma ............................................................................................................................................................ 9 Land Use Plan ............................................................................................................................................................ 13 Land Use Concept ................................................................................................................................................... 13 Policy Areas ................................................................................................................................................................ 21 Policy Areas ............................................................................................................................................................ 21 Business Park ..................................................................................................................................................... 21 Limonite Avenue ................................................................................................................................................ 21 Mira Loma Warehouse/Distribution Center ....................................................................................................... 22 Protected Equestrian Sphere ............................................................................................................................... 22 Stringfellow Acid Pits/Pyrite Canyon ................................................................................................................ 23 Rubidoux Village ............................................................................................................................................... 23 Mission Boulevard ............................................................................................................................................. 24 Santa Ana River Corridor ................................................................................................................................... 25 Flabob Airport Influence Policy Area ................................................................................................................ 27 Riverside Municipal Airport Influence Policy Area ........................................................................................... 27 Specific Plans ..................................................................................................................................................... 28 Land Use ..................................................................................................................................................................... 35 Local Land Use Policies ......................................................................................................................................... 35 Agriculture ......................................................................................................................................................... 35 Community Centers ............................................................................................................................................ 36 Design & Landscape Guidelines ........................................................................................................................ 36 Circulation .................................................................................................................................................................. 37 Local Circulation Policies ....................................................................................................................................... 37 Vehicular Circulation System ............................................................................................................................ 37 Trails and Bikeway System ................................................................................................................................ 38 Transit ................................................................................................................................................................ 38 Multipurpose Open Space ......................................................................................................................................... 43 Page ii County of Riverside General Plan Jurupa Area Plan Proposed Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan ........................................................................................... 43 MSHCP Program Description ............................................................................................................................ 43 Key Biological Issues ......................................................................................................................................... 44 Hazards ....................................................................................................................................................................... 45 Local Hazard Policies ............................................................................................................................................. 45 Flooding and Dam Inundation ............................................................................................................................ 45 Wildland Fire Hazard ......................................................................................................................................... 46 Seismic ............................................................................................................................................................... 46 Slope .................................................................................................................................................................. 46 LIST OF FIGURES 1: Location ..................................................................................................................................................................... 5 2: Physical Features ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 3: Land Use Plan .........................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Direct Testimony of Gary Thompson on Behalf Of
    1 2 3 4 5 6 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 7 OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 In the Matter of the Application of A.15-04-013 Southern California Edison Company (U338E) (Filed April 15, 2015) 10 for a Certificate of Public Convenience and (Amended April 30, 2015) 11 Necessity for the RTRP Transmission Project 12 13 14 15 16 17 DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARY THOMPSON 18 ON BEHALF OF 19 THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY 20 21 22 23 24 25 June 24, 2019 26 27 28 12774-0012\2308932v1.doc 1 DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARY THOMPSON 2 ON BEHALF OF 3 THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY 4 I. BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS 5 Q: What is your name? 6 A. Gary Thompson. 7 Q: What was your position with the City of Jurupa Valley (Jurupa Valley or the 8 City), and how long did you hold it? 9 A: From August 2014 through May 2019, I was the City Manager of Jurupa Valley. 10 Q: What is your current employment? 11 A: I am currently the Executive Officer of the Riverside Local Agency Formation 12 Commission (LAFCO). LAFCOs are state-mandated regulatory agencies established to help 13 implement State policy of encouraging orderly growth and development through the regulation of 14 local public agency boundaries. As Executive Officer, I manage Riverside LAFCOs staff and 15 conduct the day-to-day business of the Riverside LAFCO, while ensuring compliance with the 16 Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000. This involves planning, 17 organizing, and directing LAFCO staff, while acting as a liaison with County departments, State 18 and City governments, community groups, special districts and the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation and Application of the Purge Analyzer Tool (PAT) To
    Prepared in cooperation with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Evaluation and Application of the Purge Analyzer Tool (PAT) To Determine In-Well Flow and Purge Criteria for Sampling Monitoring Wells at the Stringfellow Superfund Site in Jurupa Valley, California, in 2017 Scientific Investigations Report 2020–5140 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Photograph of the waste collection pad and surrounding hillsides, Stringfellow Superfund site, Jurupa Valley, Riverside County, California; by Philip T. Harte, U.S. Geological Survey. Evaluation and Application of the Purge Analyzer Tool (PAT) To Determine In-Well Flow and Purge Criteria for Sampling Monitoring Wells at the Stringfellow Superfund Site in Jurupa Valley, California, in 2017 By Philip T. Harte, Tomas Perina, Kent Becher, Herb Levine, Daewon Rojas-Mickelson, Lesley Walther, and Anthony Brown Prepared in cooperation with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Scientific Investigations Report 2020–5140 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2021 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted material and images protected by publicity rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Jurupa Area Plan This Page Intentionally Left Blank
    Jurupa Area Plan This page intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS VISION SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................4 A Special Note on Implementing the Vision ................................................................................................5 LOCATION...........................................................................................................................................................6 FEATURES ..........................................................................................................................................................6 SETTING ............................................................................................................................................................6 UNIQUE FEATURES .............................................................................................................................................7 Santa Ana River ..........................................................................................................................................7 Jurupa Mountains/Pyrite Canyon ................................................................................................................7 Pedley Hills ..................................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F3 Mine Deformation Study
    AGUA MANSA COMMERCE PARK SPECIFIC PLAN DRAFT EIR CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY Appendices Appendix F3 Mine Deformation Study December 2019 AGUA MANSA COMMERCE PARK SPECIFIC PLAN DRAFT EIR CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY Appendices This page intentionally left blank. PlaceWorks MINE DEFORMATION STUDY FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS REPORT for AGUA MANSA COMMERCE PARK 1500 Rubidoux Boulevard Jurupa Valley, California Prepared For: Crestmore Redevelopment LLC 1745 Shea Center Drive, Suite 190 Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 Prepared By: Langan Engineering & Environmental Services 32 Executive Park, Suite 130 Irvine, California 92614 18 August 2017 700045406 18 August 2017 Mine Deformation Study Page i of i Finite Element Analysis Report Agua Mansa Commerce Park Langan Project No.: 700045406 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1 3. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1 3.1. Crestmore Mine 2 3.2. Site Geologic Setting 2 4. FINITE ELEMENT MODEL 3 4.1. Subsurface Conditions Model 3 4.2. Model Development 4 4.3. Material Properties 5 4.4. Mine Geometry 7 4.5. Mesh Generation 7 4.6. Loading Conditions 7 4.7. Staged Construction Modeling 8 5. RESULTS OF FINITE ELEMENT MODEL 9 5.1. Mesh Generation Ground Surface and Mine Roof Movements 9 5.2. Induced Stresses on Mine Pillars 9 5.3. Model Verification/Calibration 10 6. CONCLUSIONS 11 7. LIMITATIONS 12 FIGURES Figure 1 – Finite Element Model Boundaries and Cross-Sections Figure 2 – Finite Element Model Boundaries and Geometry Figure 3 – Mine Levels Isometric and Plan View Figure 4 – Construction Modeling Stages 1, 3, 5, and 6 Figure 5 – Mine Roof and Ground Surface Vertical Movements – Stage 3 Figure 6 – Ground Surface Vertical Displacements Figure 7 – Mine Roof Vertical Movements – Stages 5 and 6 Figure 8 – Effective Stress Diagrams – Unloading Conditions Figure 9 – Stage 6 Horizontal Room-Roof Stress at mine level 210 Figure 10 – Stage 6 Maximum Vertical Stress at Pillars APPENDIX A – Reference Documents 3 August 2017 Mine Deformation Study Page 1 of 12 Finite Element Analysis Report Agua Mansa Commerce Park Langan Project No.: 700045406 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Redlands Airport Association Newsletter
    Redlands Airport Association City of redlands Newsletter 12-31-20 Volume 7, Issue 4 Chapter of California Pilots Association The Mission of the RAA • To advocate for all users Observations & Comments of REI. • To promote, support, and encourage the By RAA President Ted Gablin continued use of REI. • To communicate the airport’s importance to I, like most of us, am looking forward to putting 2020 in the rear-view mirror. I am the community. thankful no one in my family has had Covid except maybe me. Unfortunately, my dad has been locked up in a senior facility in Florida, like many other seniors, with limited • To educate airport users of relevant regulatory social contact and with restrictions on family visits. We know this was done for his and legislative protection, but at 94, it’s been difficult for him and the rest of the family. airport/aviation matters. There are a few folks in our little REI village that have gotten ill from the virus and • To provide a forum whereby those others have suffered job related economic impacts from the pandemic. Others have concerned about REI been fortunate enough to continue flying activities. issues can voice their concerns. The RAA and EAA had to cancel all planned events this year. There were no Young Eagles flights, no pancake breakfasts, spot landing or flour bombing contests. The EAA • To advise the appropriate authorities cancelled their holiday party. The RAA started to plan a holiday party, but it too fell regarding safety, victim to the pandemic. It’s too bad as these events get kids interested in aviation, get security, and other the community to the airport, and gets our airport community together for good times.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life
    Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life JUNE 2003 PUBLIC USE AIRPORTS BY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Commercial/Primary (29) Metropolitan (20) Regional (66) Community (102) Limited Use (33) Joint Use — Military/Commercial (2) The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the State of California or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. This report was prepared with funds from a grant provided by the United States Government (80%) and funds from the State of California (20%). Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life FINAL REPORT Prepared for BUSINESS,TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS Submitted by Economics Research Associates JUNE 2003 ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Nancy Benjamin Alan R. Tubbs Study Project Manager District Field Services Manager California Department of Transportation Airborne Express, Mather Field Division of Aeronautics Chuck Oldham R. Austin Wiswell Robert Chung Chief California Transportation Commission California Department of Transportation Division of Aeronautics Carl Williams Senior Policy Director Michael Armstrong California Space Authority, Inc. (CSA) Senior Lead Planner Southern California Association of Governments Bonnie Cornwall (SCAG) Program Manager Division
    [Show full text]
  • Thrifty Oil Bloomington Warehouse Initial Study
    SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This form and the descriptive information in the application package constitute the contents of Initial Study pursuant to County Guidelines under Ordinance 3040 and Section 15063 of the State CEQA Guidelines. PROJECT LABEL: APN: 0260-131-14, 0260-0131-15 APPLICANT: Howard Industrial Partners, LLC USGS Quad: San Bernardino South COMMUNITY: Agua Mansa/Rialto/5th Supervisorial District T, R, Section: T2S R4W 2 LOCATION: 12685 Holly Street STAFF: Aron Liang SB Countywide Plan: Heavy Industrial (H-IND) and Open Space Agricultural (OS-AG) REP('S): Mike Tunney, Howard Industrial Partners, Planning Area: Agua Mansa Industrial Corridor Specific Plan LLC PROPOSAL: Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a parking lot to accommodate 1,561 parking spaces for automobiles, long haul tractors, and trailers, on approximately 64.8 acres. PROJECT CONTACT INFORMATION: Lead Agency: San Bernardino County Land Use Services Department 385 North Arrowhead Avenue, First Floor San Bernardino, CA 92415 Contact Person: Aron Liang, Senior Planner Phone No: (909) 387-0235 Fax No: (909) 387-7911 E-mail: [email protected] Project Sponsor: Howard Industrial Partners, LLC 1944 N. Tustin Street, Suite 122 Orange, CA 92865 Consultant: Environment | Planning | Development Solutions, Inc. 2030 Main Street, Suite 1200 Irvine, CA 92614 APN: 026-013-114, 026-013-115 INITIAL STUDY Page 2 of 78 Holly Street Parking Lot Project P201700305 February 20, 2019 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is the redevelopment of the approximately 65 acre project site, which is currently a motorcycle track (Milestone MX motorcycle park) and other ancillary improvements into a parking lot to be used for truck tractor, tractor trailer storage and overflow employee parking associated with the existing FedEx facilities located at 330 Resource Drive, Rialto or 11600 Cactus Ave., Bloomington, both approximately 2.1 miles north of the project site.
    [Show full text]
  • Perris General Plan Circulation Element
    City of Perris General Plan Circulation Element (City Council Adoption – June 14, 2005) (City Council Amendment (GPA 08-07-0010) – August 26, 2008) Circulation Element i City of Perris General Plan Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Authority and Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 1 Regional and Local Setting ........................................................................................................................ 1 Relationship to Other Technical and Planning Documents ............................................................ 2 Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................ 10 Street and Highway System .................................................................................................................... 10 Public/Mass Transportation System .................................................................................................... 23 Non-Motorized Transportation ............................................................................................................ 25 Aviation ....................................................................................................................................................... 27 Goods Movement .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution Number 4376 a Resolution of the City
    RESOLUTION NUMBER 4376 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING A HIGH SPEED RAIL ALIGNMENT ALONG THE 1-215 WITH STATIONS NEAR MARCH AIR RESERVE BASE AND THE DOWNTOWN SAN BERNARDINO TRANSIT CENTER WHEREAS, the California state government is proposing to build a high-speed rail line stretching from San Diego to Sacramento; and WHEREAS, California’s high-speed train initiative has attracted interest from around the world – and won our state a larger share of federal funding than any similar project in the country -- $2.25 billion; and WHEREAS, the southern section of the high speed rail project will link San Diego to Los Angeles, via the Inland Empire; and WHEREAS, the California High Speed Rail Authority is charged with determining the rail alignment and location of rail stations, and are currently deciding whether to follow an I-15 alignment through Corona or an I-215 alignment through Riverside and San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, the measure of success for the high speed rail project will be ridership and the ability of the project to be self-supporting; and WHEREAS, the Inland Empire, comprised of Riverside and San Bernardino Counties, has a population of over four million people as of 2008, and is the second largest area in Southern California. Since the 2000 Census, the area has experienced a 25.4% growth in population; and WHEREAS, of the staggering growth in the Inland Empire, the overwhelming majority is along the I-215 corridor in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. The existing population along the I-215 corridor and Coachella Valley is near 2.2 million potential riders; and WHEREAS, residents in Riverside and San Bernardino County cities along the I-215 corridor and in Coachella Valley simply cannot get to an I-15 station easily.
    [Show full text]
  • March/April – 2008 1 PERPETUAL CALENDAR 2008 8 Wisconsin Chapter’S Annual Pancake Breakfast and Fly-In, KRYV Watertown APRIL Airport
    99 News – March/April – 2008 1 PERPETUAL CALENDAR 2008 8 Wisconsin Chapter’s Annual Pancake Breakfast and Fly-In, KRYV Watertown APRIL Airport. Contact Krys Brown at 99 News [email protected]. 4-6 Southeast Section Spring Meeting, Bay 20-22 Forest of Friendship, Atchison, KS, Secu- Watch Resort and Conference Center, rity and Solace through Flight – military Myrtle Beach, SC. Hosted by Carolinas To list your 99s events aviation and humanitarian flight organiza- Chapter. Contact Reva Carpenter at tions. Visit www.ifof.org. on this calendar page, [email protected] or elizlee@comporium. send information to: net. 24-27 Air Race Classic, begins in Bozeman, MT The 99 News and ends in Mansfield, MA. Contact Linda 4300 Amelia Earhart Dr 8-14 Sun ‘n Fun, Lakeland, FL. Stop in at The Marshall, phone 406-388-7668 or visit Suite A 99s building for refreshments and friend- www. airraceclassic.org. Oklahoma City, OK ship. Visit www.sun-n-fun.org. 73159-1140 12 25th Anniversary Celebration of the Three 30 Deadline for submitting Professional Pilot Email: Rivers Chapter (North Central Section), Leadership Initiative (PPLI) application. [email protected] Fort Wayne, IN. Open House at the Ivy Email [email protected] or visit Tech Aviation Technology Building located www.ninety-nines.org/careers/ Online Form: mentoring.html. www.ninety-nines.org/ on Smith Field (SMD). Contact Linda Murphy, 260-632-5620 or 260-413-8134 99newsreports.html JULY (cell) or [email protected]. Please indicate the 28-Aug 3 EAA/AIRVENTURE, Oshkosh, WI. Visit 25-27 North Central Section Spring Meeting, name and location The Ninety-Nines tent, and on July 31 en- Osceola, IA.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
    SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE PLAN DRAFT PEIR COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 5. Environmental Analysis 5.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS This section evaluates the potential impacts of the proposed Project on human health and the environment due to exposure to hazardous materials or hazardous conditions associated with the Project site, Project construction, and Project operations. Potential Project impacts and appropriate mitigation measures or standard conditions are included as necessary. The analysis in this section is based, in part, upon the following source(s): . County of San Bernardino Safety Background Report, PlaceWorks and Dudek, April 5, 2017. A complete copy of this study is included in the Technical Appendices to this Draft PEIR (Appendix G). 5.8.1 Hazardous Materials 5.8.1.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Regulatory Background Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 (42 USC. § 6901 et seq.) is the principal federal law that regulates the generation, management, and transportation of waste. Hazardous waste management includes the treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous waste. The RCRA gave the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the authority to control hazardous waste from “cradle to grave,” that is, from generation to transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal, at active and future facilities. It does not address abandoned or historical sites. The RCRA also set forth a framework for managing nonhazardous wastes. Later amendments required phasing out land disposal of hazardous waste and added underground tanks storing petroleum and other hazardous substances. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 (42 USC § 9601 et seq.), commonly known as the Superfund, protects water, air, and land resources from the risks created by past chemical disposal practices such as abandoned and historical hazardous waste sites.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shops at Jurupa Valley Project Draft Environmental Impact Report SCH#2020100167
    The Shops at Jurupa Valley Project Draft Environmental Impact Report SCH#2020100167 Lead Agency City of Jurupa Valley 8930 Limonite Avenue Jurupa Valley, CA 92509 February 22, 2021 All files are available at the following links: https://www.jurupavalley.org/DocumentCenter/Index/68 (see folder labeled MA20035 Shops at Jurupa Valley) Governor's Office of Planning and Research, CEQAnet Web Portal at https://ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/ Enter "2020100167" in the search box and find under "MA20035 The Shops at Jurupa Valley." The Shops at Jurupa Valley Project Draft Environmental Impact Report SCH#2020100167 Lead Agency City of Jurupa Valley 8930 Limonite Avenue Jurupa Valley, CA 92509 Contact: Patty Anders, AICP, Senior Planning Consultant [email protected] Prepared By City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department Ernest Perea, CEQA Administrator Applicant Panorama Properties, Inc. 2005 Winston Ct. Upland, CA 91784 Lead Agency Discretionary Permits Change of Zone (CZ) No. 20001 Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 37890 Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 20001 Site Development Permit (SDP) No. 20018 Variance (VAR) (No.21001) February 22, 2021 The Shops at Jurupa Valley Draft EIR Table of Contents Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Summary Description of The Project ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]