Yandicoogina Baseline Hydrology Page 1 of 60 Contents Page

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Yandicoogina Baseline Hydrology Page 1 of 60 Contents Page Resource Development Surface Water Management Baseline hydrology assessment for Yandicoogina discharge 02 April 2012 (Update to Report – Baseline hydrology assessment for Marillana Creek discharge released 4 May 2010) Future expansion at RTIO Yandicoogina has the potential to increase the volume of surplus water generation and discharge into Marillana and Weeli Wolli Creeks. A baseline hydrological/hydraulic assessment was carried out to access the existing situation and movement of discharged water along the creek systems and to predict the likely behaviour of the released water for various discharge scenarios. Surplus water is discharged by BHPBIO and RTIO Yandicoogina mine operations at several locations along Marillana Creek (BHPBIO discharge outlet is located 2 km up gradient of the RTIO Oxbow deposit; RTIO discharge network is located adjacent to the Junction Central mine) and two outlets by RTIO Hope Downs 1 and Yandicoogina operations in Weeli Wolli Creek (Hope Downs 1 discharge outlet is located 500 m up gradient of the Weeli Wolli Spring; RTIO Discharge Outlet 6 is positioned adjacent to the Junction South East mine). In December 2009, the total average discharge rate to the creek systems from all three mining operations was 116 ML/day or 42 GL/year. The assessment demonstrated that historically discharged water would not have extended past the Marillana Creek catchment outlet at the confluence with Weeli Wolli Creek; hence anecdotally no flow contribution to Weeli Wolli would have been expected. This suggests the wetting front in Weeli Wolli Creek is likely to have resulted from surplus water discharged from the Hope Downs 1 mine operation. The average maximum steady state inundation or discharge footprint produced from the total average discharge, from 1998 to 2009, was expected to extend approximately 2.5 km down gradient from the confluence of Weeli Wolli and Marillana Creeks. On the other hand, the discharge footprint would extend 5.5 km downstream from the confluence if 60 GL/year (peak discharge from 1998 to 2009) of surplus water was released at a constant rate into the creek systems. A discharge footprint of 35.4 km from the BHPBIO discharge outlet and 36.1 km from the Hope Downs 1 discharge outlet or 16.3 km down gradient from the Weeli Wolli – Marillana Creek confluence was estimated for the maximum modelled 110 GL/year regional surplus discharge (based on existing infrastructure). An option to relocate the discharge location in Marillana Creek down gradient from the mine operations was also investigated. Modelling indicated that the footprint distance would extend from approximately 6.7 km to 17.3 km down gradient from the Weeli Wolli – Marillana Creek confluence for modelled volumes 55 GL/year to 110 GL/year. Due to the dynamic nature of the Weeli Wolli Creek system, the creek channel and in particular the section that drains the alluvial plain is capable of changing course during large flood events. This type of event would modify the existing drainage flow path of the discharged water and alter the course of the discharge footprints. Yandicoogina baseline hydrology Page 1 of 60 Contents page Introduction 3 1. Issue 3 2. Objectives 3 Catchment characteristics 4 3. Hydrology 4 4. Rainfall 5 5. Hydrogeology 7 6. Alluvium characteristics 8 7. Riparian vegetation 11 7.1 Mapped vegetation 11 7.2 Evapotranspiration 14 Discharge modelling 16 8. Modelling approach 16 8.1 Defining the discharge footprint 16 8.2 Surface water – groundwater connectivity 18 9. Discharge water balance calculations 20 9.1 Methodology 20 10. Modelling scenarios 28 10.1 Existing discharge regime 28 10.1.1 Scenario 1: Comparison of observed and predicted wetting fronts 28 10.1.2 Scenario 2: Average discharge between 2007 and 2009 29 10.1.3 Scenario 3: Peak discharge between 1998 and 2009 29 10.2 Proposed discharge scenarios 29 10.2.1 Scenario 4: Discharge rate options – 60 GL/year 29 10.2.2 Scenario 5: Discharge rate options – 90 GL/year 29 10.2.3 Scenario 6: Relocation of Marillana Creek discharge outlets 29 11. Modelling results 30 11.1 Existing discharge footprints 30 11.2 Proposed discharge footprints 33 11.2.1 Scenarios 4 and 5 33 11.2.2 Scenario 6 35 Conclusion 40 Appendix A – Base case output 42 Appendix B – Scenario output 47 Addendums– Scenario 7 to 9 including BHPBIO Jinidi 52 References 60 Yandicoogina baseline hydrology Page 2 of 60 Introduction 1. Issue Surplus water is generated as a result of mining below the groundwater table. The volume and rate of surplus water generation will be determined by the difference between the rate at which site and other parties can use the water and the rate of abstraction. The current total abstraction rate for Yandicoogina Junction Central (JC) and Junction South East (JSE) is 35 GL/year, with the potential to increase to a maximum 55 GL/year as a result of expansion and development of the Junction South West (JSW) and Oxbow deposits. Management of water on Rio Tinto sites follows strict environmental and water use standards (refer to Rio Tinto Environmental Standards). These standards align with the Western Australian State Government Department of Water hierarchy of disposal options informal regulatory guidelines (Bessan Consulting Services, 2007) that recommend (in order of preference): Use on site; Transfer to another site or industrial location; Re-injection; Controlled discharge to surface (irrigation); and Uncontrolled discharge to surface (creek discharge). Any surplus water not utilised in the first four strategies is currently being discharged into Marillana and Weeli Wolli Creeks. Discharge of surplus water from the BHPBIO Yandicoogina mine operation into Marillana Creek began in May 1992. In 1998 RTIO started releasing surplus water into Marillana Creek and by December 2006 the combined operations were discharging at an average rate of 34 ML/day. Release of surplus water into Weeli Wolli Creek began in 2007 with expansion of the JSE mine and development of the Hope Downs 1 operation up gradient of Yandicoogina. By December 2009, the combined average discharge rate to Marillana and Weeli Wolli Creeks from all three operations was 116 ML/day. 2. Objectives The purpose of this study was to predict the hydrological reaction of the creek systems to artificial discharge. The specific objectives of the assessment were: To characterise the stream morphology of sections of Marillana and Weeli Wolli Creeks downstream of the discharge outlets. This was accomplished by reviewing the stream pattern, river/floodplain geometry, soil profile/geological logs, vegetation patterns and community distribution, and other characteristics of the receiving creeks to establish representative “reaches”. To determine the hydraulic characteristics associated with different volumes of water released into the system. This work was accomplished in order to determine the capacity and reaction (water movement) of the creeks at different discharge volumes. To establish the area over which the released water could travel (or discharge footprint). Yandicoogina baseline hydrology Page 3 of 60 Catchment characteristics The dearth of hydrological data in the Pilbara, especially related to small and medium sized catchments, their stream flow and rainfall distribution patterns, makes it impossible to use standard hydrology assessment methodologies to determine surface water flow characteristics in local Pilbara catchments. To overcome this limitation and to provide a methodology for estimating the potential flow conditions of artificial discharge into ephemeral Pilbara creeks, hydroecology techniques for evaluating water movement have been adopted. Hydroecology is the inter-disciplinary study of the interactions between ecological processes and water movement. For the purpose of this study, information that could be extracted from the Pilbara landscape to help describe baseline hydrological characteristics, in the absence of historical stream flow or climate series data, included: vegetation patterns and communities in the riparian zone, pool location/absence and water quality, geomorphology of the creek bed, banks and floodplain, and soil/regolith geology properties and patterns (particularly as recorded in satellite remote sensing imagery). These catchment characteristics are described below and are subsequently used to define the inputs to the discharge modelling. 3. Hydrology The Weeli Wolli Creek regional catchment covers an area of approximately 4,000 km2. The upper Weeli Wolli Creek catchment, up gradient of the Hope Downs 1 mine, is characterised by relatively wide, flat plains of gentle gradient, surrounded by rugged hills of outcropping Marra Mamba Iron and Brockman Iron Formation. The Creek and its tributaries drain in a north easterly direction past the Hope Downs 1 mine site, converging at a narrow valley system. Weeli Wolli Spring is located at the mouth of the valley, approximately 10 km down gradient from the Hope Downs 1 mine site. The Creek continues its path downstream into the lower Weeli Wolli Creek catchment, joins with Marillana Creek to the west and drains onto a wide alluvial floodplain 20 to 30 km across in the Fortescue Valley, producing a meandering channel that can alter its course following large flood events. The flows terminate at the Fortescue Marsh, an internally draining basin of the Upper Fortescue River catchment. Marillana Creek, a major tributary of the Weeli Wolli Creek system, has a total catchment area of 2,230 km2. The headwaters rise from the high relief areas of Hamersley Range where the Creek drains in an east and north easterly direction into the Munjina Claypan. The Claypan, an internally draining basin, has a total area of approximately 274 km2. It is subject to periodic inundation following rainfall events and has the potential to retain surface water flows for lower flood events, ≤ 1 in 10 year annual recurrence interval (ARI). Surface water exceeding the internal holding capacity of the basin spills south east into the lower Marillana Creek catchment. The lower Marillana Creek drains in an easterly direction through the existing BHPBIO and RTIO Yandicoogina operations before merging with Weeli Wolli Creek.
Recommended publications
  • Cooks River Valley Association Inc. PO Box H150, Hurlstone Park NSW 2193 E: [email protected] W: ABN 14 390 158 512
    Cooks River Valley Association Inc. PO Box H150, Hurlstone Park NSW 2193 E: [email protected] W: www.crva.org.au ABN 14 390 158 512 8 August 2018 To: Ian Naylor Manager, Civic and Executive Support Leichhardt Service Centre Inner West Council 7-15 Wetherill Street Leichhardt NSW 2040 Dear Ian Re: Petition on proposal to establish a Pemulwuy Cooks River Trail The Cooks River Valley Association (CRVA) would like to submit the attached petition to establish a Pemulwuy Cooks River Trail to the Inner West Council. The signatures on the petition were mainly collected at two events that were held in Marrickville during April and May 2018. These events were the Anzac Day Reflection held on 25 April 2018 in Richardson’s Lookout – Marrickville Peace Park and the National Sorry Day Walk along the Cooks River via a number of Indigenous Interpretive Sites on 26 May 2018. The purpose of the petition is to creatively showcase the history and culture of the local Aboriginal community along the Cooks River and to publicly acknowledge the role of Pemulwuy as “father of local Aboriginal resistance”. The action petitioned for was expressed in the following terms: “We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who urge Inner West Council in conjunction with Council’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Reference Group (A&TSIRG) to designate the walk between the Aboriginal Interpretive Sites along the Cooks River parks in Marrickville as the Pemulwuy Trail and produce an information leaflet to explain the sites and the Aboriginal connection to the Cooks River (River of Goolay’yari).” A total of 60 signatures have been collected on the petition attached.
    [Show full text]
  • 109. M4-M5 EIS Vol 2I App T Groundwater Part 1
    M4-M5 Link Environmental Impact Statement August 2017 Appendix T Volume 2I Since finalisation of the Environmental Impact Statement, the project has been declared by Ministerial Order to be State significant infrastructure and critical State significant infrastructure under sections 115U (4) and 115V of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The Ministerial Order also amended Schedule 5 of State Environmental Planning Policy (State and Regional Development) 2011. The project remains subject to assessment under Part 5.1 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and requires the approval of the Minister for Planning. WestConnex speaks your language Greek Learn more by visiting µ www.westconnex.com.au/yourlanguage www.westconnex.com.au/yourlanguage to watch project videos in your language and read more about WestConnex. If you need an interpreter, call the Translating WestConnex. µ , µ 131 450. and Interpreting Service on 131 450. Italian Arabic Per saperne di più visiti il sito www.westconnex.com.au/yourlanguage www.westconnex.com.au/yourlanguage, dove potrà guardare i video del progetto in lingua italiana e trovare maggiori informazioni su WestConnex. Se ha bisogno di un interprete, contatti il Servizio di Traduzione ed Interpretariato (Translating ł ł .131 450 and Interpreting Service) al numero 131 450. Chinese Korean 了解詳情請上網 www.westconnex.com.au/yourlanguage 를 방문하여한국어로 www.westconnex.com.au/yourlanguage觀看(普通話) 된 프로젝트 비디오를 보고 WestConnex 에 관해 읽고 배우세요. 視頻, 並 查閱有關WestConnex的更多訊息。如需要傳譯員請 통역이 필요하시면 번역 및 통역 서비스 131 450 (TIS) 으로 전화 。。 撥電話傳譯服務 131 450 하십시오. Hindi Vietnamese : Hãy tìm hi u thêm và vi ng trang m ng www.westconnex.com.au/yourlanguage ( ) www.westconnex.com.au/yourlanguage xem phim nh b ng Vi t ng v công trình này và c thêm v WestConnex.
    [Show full text]
  • ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH - up the Heat On
    TurningENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH - Up The Heat On... Environmental Health Australia (New South Wales) Incorporated EHA (NSW) INC in partnership with NSW Food Authority present the ANNUAL STATE CONFERENCE AND FRP WORKSHOP 2019 Quarantine Station 1 North Head Scenic Drive, Manly Monday 19 to Friday 23 August 2019 Hosted by Northern Beaches Council in Partnership with the NSW Food Authority PROUDLY SUPPORTED BY EHA (NSW) INC in partnership with NSW Food Authority present the Wednesday 21 August 2019 ANNUAL STATE CONFERENCE AND FRP WORKSHOP 2019 8.00 am Tea/Coffee and trade exhibition Quarantine Station Keynote Speaker: Professor Anthony Capon, Professor of Planetary Health, University of Sydney 8.30 am 1 North Head Scenic Drive, Manly Environmental impacts on human health Turning up the Heat on... Hazardous waste Turning up the Heat on... Regulation (Clan Labs) • Turning up the Heat on investigating offences – Mark Monday 19 August 2019 • Impacts and risks of second-hand exposure to Cottom, Pikes and Verekers Lawyers methamphetamine - Dr Jackie Wright, Environmental • Turning up the Heat on regulating equitable access 12.00 - 5.00pm Clan Labs Workshop Risk Sciences Pty Ltd to NSW’s natural water resources – Sarah Flowers & 5.30 pm Welcome function 9.00 am • The problem with clandestine drug laboratories. A Nicole Power – Natural Resources Access Regulator Council’s Perspective – Sharon O’Regan, Wollondilly • Investigating oxidation reduction potential in public 7.00 pm Close Shire Council swimming pools - Nick Ives, Northern Sydney Local • Turning up the Heat on Clandestine Cooking – Juliet Health District Duffy, Regional EnviroScience Panel discussion Tuesday 20 August 2019 Panel discussion 10.30 am Morning Tea - Trade exhibition 8.30 am Registration and trade exhibition Turning up the Heat on..
    [Show full text]
  • Brockman 2 Detrital Iron Ore Mine Extension Phase 2B
    Brockman 2 Detrital Iron Ore Mine Extension Phase 2B Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd Report 1393 April 2011 Assessment on Proponent Information Environmental Impact Assessment Process Timelines Date Progress stages Time (weeks) 07/02/11 Level of assessment set 22/03/11 Proponent’s final API document received by EPA 6 19/04/11 Publication of EPA report (3 days after report to Minister) 4 03/05/11 Close of appeals period 2 Timelines for an assessment may vary according to the complexity of the project and are usually agreed with the proponent soon after the level of assessment is determined. In this case, the Environmental Protection Authority met its timeline objective in the completion of the assessment and provision of a report to the Minister. Dr Paul Vogel Chairman 19/4/11 ISSN 1836-0483 (Print) ISSN 1836-0491 (Online) Assessment No. 1865 Report 1393: Brockman 2 Detrital Iron Ore Mine Extension Phase 2B Contents Page 1. Introduction and background ...................................................................... 1 2. The proposal ................................................................................................. 1 3. Consultation .................................................................................................. 3 4. Key environmental factors ........................................................................... 3 4.1 Groundwater .......................................................................................... 3 4.2 Mine Closure and Rehabilitation .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing the Impact of Weirs on Aquatic Habitat
    REDUCING THE IMPACT OF WEIRS ON AQUATIC HABITAT NSW DETAILED WEIR REVIEW REPORT TO THE NEW SOUTH WALES ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST SYDNEY METROPOLITAN CMA REGION Published by NSW Department of Primary Industries. © State of New South Wales 2006. This publication is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in an unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal use or for non-commercial use within your organisation provided due credit is given to the author and publisher. To copy, adapt, publish, distribute or commercialise any of this publication you will need to seek permission from the Manager Publishing, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange, NSW. DISCLAIMER The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing (July 2006). However, because of advances in knowledge, users are reminded of the need to ensure that information upon which they rely is up to date and to check the currency of the information with the appropriate officer of NSW Department of Primary Industries or the user‘s independent adviser. This report should be cited as: NSW Department of Primary Industries (2006). Reducing the Impact of Weirs on Aquatic Habitat - New South Wales Detailed Weir Review. Sydney Metropolitan CMA region. Report to the New South Wales Environmental Trust. NSW Department of Primary Industries, Flemington, NSW. ISBN: 0 7347 1753 9 (New South Wales Detailed Weir Review) ISBN: 978 0 7347 1833 4 (Sydney Metropolitan CMA region) Cover photos: Cob-o-corn Weir, Cob-o-corn Creek, Northern Rivers CMA (upper left); Stroud Weir, Karuah River, Hunter/Central Rivers CMA (upper right); Mollee Weir, Namoi River, Namoi CMA (lower left); and Hartwood Weir, Billabong Creek, Murray CMA (lower right).
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook of Western Australian Aboriginal Languages South of the Kimberley Region
    PACIFIC LINGUISTICS Series C - 124 HANDBOOK OF WESTERN AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES SOUTH OF THE KIMBERLEY REGION Nicholas Thieberger Department of Linguistics Research School of Pacific Studies THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Thieberger, N. Handbook of Western Australian Aboriginal languages south of the Kimberley Region. C-124, viii + 416 pages. Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University, 1993. DOI:10.15144/PL-C124.cover ©1993 Pacific Linguistics and/or the author(s). Online edition licensed 2015 CC BY-SA 4.0, with permission of PL. A sealang.net/CRCL initiative. Pacific Linguistics is issued through the Linguistic Circle of Canberra and consists of four series: SERIES A: Occasional Papers SERIES c: Books SERIES B: Monographs SERIES D: Special Publications FOUNDING EDITOR: S.A. Wurm EDITORIAL BOARD: T.E. Dutton, A.K. Pawley, M.D. Ross, D.T. Tryon EDITORIAL ADVISERS: B.W.Bender KA. McElhanon University of Hawaii Summer Institute of Linguistics DavidBradley H.P. McKaughan La Trobe University University of Hawaii Michael G. Clyne P. Miihlhausler Monash University University of Adelaide S.H. Elbert G.N. O'Grady University of Hawaii University of Victoria, B.C. KJ. Franklin KL. Pike Summer Institute of Linguistics Summer Institute of Linguistics W.W.Glover E.C. Polome Summer Institute of Linguistics University of Texas G.W.Grace Gillian Sankoff University of Hawaii University of Pennsylvania M.A.K Halliday W.A.L. Stokhof University of Sydney University of Leiden E. Haugen B.K T' sou Harvard University City Polytechnic of Hong Kong A. Healey E.M. Uhlenbeck Summer Institute of Linguistics University of Leiden L.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft South District Plan
    Draft South District Plan co-creating a greater sydney November 2016 How to be involved This draft District Plan sets You can read the entire Before making a submission, out aspirations and proposals draft District Plan at please read our privacy for Greater Sydney’s South www.greater.sydney and send statement at District, which includes the feedback: www.greater.sydney/privacy local government areas of • via www.greater.sydney For more information Canterbury-Bankstown, visit www.greater.sydney Georges River and Sutherland. • by email: call us on 1800 617 681 It has been developed by the [email protected] Greater Sydney Commission. • by post: or email: Greater Sydney Commission [email protected] This draft District Plan is on Draft South District Plan formal public exhibition until PO Box 257, the end of March 2017, and will Parramatta NSW 2124 be finalised towards the end of 2017 to allow as many people as possible to provide input. This document was updated on 21 December 2016 to address typographical errors and production faults. A detailed list of the errata can be found at www.greater.sydney/content/publications Draft South District Plan Exhibition THIS SEPARATE DOCUMENT DOCUMENT Overview Draft District Maps Background Website Plan Material Dashboard Our vision — Towards our Greater Sydney 2056 Summary The requirements A compilation of Data and Reports How the A draft brochure of the legislative maps and spatial used to inform the draft District Plan is amendment to of the draft framework information used draft District Plan to be monitored update A Plan for District Plan to inform the draft Growing Sydney District Plan You can view these supporting components, as well as Our vision — Towards our Greater Sydney 2056, SOUTH DISTRICT our proposed 40-year vision for Greater Sydney, at www.greater.sydney.
    [Show full text]
  • Feature Feature Major Wa Mining Projects
    FEATURE FEATURE MINING OUTLOOK Construction workers needed for major Major WA mining projects MINING OUTLOOK 27,000 WA resources projects 2014-15 Source: Pitcrew Port Hedland Pardoo Rio Tinto rail MAJOR WA MINING PROJECTS Dampier Cape Lambert Iron Bridge Mt Dove Rio Tinto mine Completed in past year Balla Balla Abydos (Forge Resources) BHP rail Karara Mining Karara project $2.6bn Mid West Production ramp-up proceeding Sino Iron Wodgina Rio Tinto Hope Downs 4 mine $2.1bn Pilbara First production in H1 2013, ramping up to 15mtpa BHP mine Rio Tinto Marandoo mine expansion $1.1bn Pilbara Production will be sustained at 15mtpa for 16 further years Mt Webber McPhee Creek FMG rail Fortescue Metals Christmas Creek 2 expansion $US1.0bn Pilbara Completed in June 2013 quarter Fortescue Metals Port Hedland port expansion $US2.4bn Pilbara Fourth berth and support infrastructure opened in Aug 2013 Pannawonica FMG mine Atlas Iron Mt Dove mine development n/a Pilbara Production commenced in Dec 2012 Hancock proposed rail Atlas Iron Abydos mine development n/a Pilbara First haulage in Aug 2013, ramping up to 2-3mtpa Solomon Atlas Iron Utah Point 2 stockyard n/a Pilbara Largely complete and now ready to receive ore Hancock mine Hub Christmas Creek Rio Tinto Argyle Diamonds underground mine $US2.2bn Kimberley Production commenced in H1 2013 and is ramping up Buckland (Iron Ore Holdings) Cloudbreak Mineral Resources Sandfire Resources DeGrussa copper mine $US384m Mid West Ramp-up to nameplate production nearing completion Koodaideri Roy Hill Atlas Iron Construction
    [Show full text]
  • PROGRAM April– May – June 2021
    PROGRAM April– May – June 2021 Lilo Heathcote NP Feb 2021 PO BOX 250 SUTHERLAND NSW 1499 ABN 28 780 135 294 http://www.sutherlandbushwalkers.org.au INTRODUCTION Sutherland Bushwalkers Club provides opportunities for safe bush sports activities. Membership is open to all 18 years of age and over and currently stands at approx. 300 members. The club meets on the last Wednesday of each month (except Jan and Dec) at the Sutherland Council Stapleton Avenue Community Centre, cnr. Stapleton Ave & Belmont St, Sutherland at 7.00 pm. For membership enquiries and/or further information, see the club’s website or email us at [email protected] BOOKINGS It is imperative that bookings are made directly with the Activity Organiser. At least 4 days’ notice for one-day activities and 10 days for o/night activities should be given if you wish to participate. Frequently there is a limit on the number of people, so it is best to book early. Visitors are welcome on activities if the Activity Organiser agrees. MEETING AND DEPARTURE TIMES The time and conditions for meeting and departing cannot be extended to wait for those who are late. If you find that you are not able to attend, please advise the Activity Organiser immediately. This may allow another person to attend when numbers are limited. TRANSPORT Car pooling is an option and the costs are shared between the passengers. The following formula is suggested: calculate contribution of each person by doubling the cost of fuel and dividing by the number of occupants, including the driver, and share equally any additional costs, eg entrance fees, road tolls etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamersley HMS Pty Limited Baby Hope Mine Closure Plan
    Hamersley HMS Pty Limited Baby Hope Mine Closure Plan Mineral Field 47 – West Pilbara FDMS No. RTIO-HSE-0245210 17 August 2015 Contact details: Kirsty Beckett Hamersley HMS Pty Limited 152 – 158 St Georges Terrace, Perth GPO Box A42, Perth, WA 6837 T: +61 8 6213 0468 [email protected] http://www.riotinto.com Baby Hope Mine Closure Plan August 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Overview Hope Downs 1 South West Marra Mamba deposit (Baby Hope) comprises a series of open cut iron ore pits located immediately to the south of the existing Hope Downs 1 mining operations (HD1). The deposit is located in the eastern Pilbara region of Western Australia, approximately 75 km north-west of Newman and will be developed using conventional drill-and-blast and load-and-haul mining methods. Ore will be processed at HD1. HD1 and Baby Hope are managed by Hamersley HMS Pty Limited (Hamersley HMS), which is a member of the Rio Tinto group (Rio Tinto). Scope This closure plan has been prepared to support the Baby Hope Area referral under Part IV of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (EP Act). This closure plan is designed to address the closure requirements for the Baby Hope deposit and associated infrastructure. Closure is assumed to include progressive rehabilitation that will occur throughout the life of the mine. The goal of mine closure is to relinquish the site to the Government. This closure plan has been developed to meet the requirements of the joint Office of the Environmental Protection Authority / Department of Mines and Petroleum Guidelines for Preparing Mine Closure Plans (2015) 1 (Closure Guidelines).
    [Show full text]
  • Other Land Users
    25 YEARS OF NATIVE TITLE RECOGNITION Contents Overview 1 Argyle, Western Australia 2 Burrup Ancient Art 2 Rio Tinto agreements with 3 traditional owners Facilitating engagement on 3 cultural heritage Landmark High Court 3 decision: native title rights not extinguished by Mining Leases Native title railway 4 agreement to protect rock Bendigo Mining Agreement, signed in 2000 art Historic agreement: Pilbara 4 OTHER LAND USERS traditional owners and Rio Tinto Iron Ore The introduction of the Native Title Act 1993(Cth) had a profound effect on other land users, including the resource sector, pastoralists and graziers, Agreement to protect 5 fishers and local government. For the first time there was a legal requirement Gnulli heritage to take into account the native title rights and interests of Indigenous people The development of 6 when developing land. The initial response was one of fear and uncertainty; Australian Indigenous rights however, these sectors soon adapted to the new processes and became and Rio Tinto’s Indigenous regular participants in the native title process. involvement Watch: Ms Joanne Farrell, Managing Director Australia, Rio Tinto provide a perspective from the resource sector. OTHER LAND USERS Argyle, Western Australia Rio Tinto’s Argyle mine has a Participation Agreement in place with the Traditional Owners of the Argyle land to ensure that they benefit directly from the mine’s operations, now and for generations to come. This agreement —built on the principles of co-commitment, partnership and mutual trust—encompasses land rights, income generation, employment and contracting opportunities, land management and Indigenous site protection. A Traditional Owner relationship committee meets regularly to oversee the implementation of the agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Assessment of the North-West Hamersley Range
    Securing Western Australia’s water future Groundwater assessment of the north-west Hamersley Range Hydrogeological record series Report no. HG62 August 2016 Groundwater assessment of the north-west Hamersley Range Securing Western Australia’s water future Department of Water Hydrogeological record series Report no. HG62 August 2016 Department of Water 168 St Georges Terrace Perth Western Australia 6000 Telephone +61 8 6364 7600 Facsimile +61 8 6364 7601 National Relay Service 13 36 77 www.water.wa.gov.au © Government of Western Australia August 2016 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Department of Water. ISBN [978-1-925387-82-7] (print) ISBN [978-1-925387-83-4] (online) Acknowledgements The Department of Water thanks the following for their contribution to this publication. This summary document was prepared by Seth Johnson of HydroConcept Pty Ltd, based on a more comprehensive, technical report. Review and editing was undertaken by James Milne, Sandie McHugh, Gary Humphreys, Kevin Hopkinson and Alex Waterhouse. This project is made possible by the State Government’s Royalties for Regions program. For more information, visit http://www.drd.wa.gov.au. For more information about this report, contact Manager Water Resource Assessment Branch. Cover photograph: Riverine pool within Robe River Disclaimer This document has been published by the Department of Water.
    [Show full text]