Parliamentary Research Digest

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parliamentary Research Digest PAKISTAN INSTITUTE FOR PARLIAMENTARY SERVICES DEDICATED TO PARLIAMENTARY EXCELLENCE ISSN # 2414-8040 Parliamentary Research Digest VOLUME 5,ISSUE 10 OCTOBER,2018 INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Editorial The International Democracy Day is celebrated on September 15 every year; PIPS held its 4th OPINION annual Seminar to commemorate the event with this year’s Inter Parliamentary Union (IPU) Pakistan under Grey List of Theme – What if Parliamentary Oversight did not Exist along with Inter University Quiz competition Financial Action Task Force on Know Your Parliament, pro-actively participated by 115 faculty and students lead by parliamen- (FATF) tary panel comprising Senator Faisal Javed and MNA Ms Shahida Akhter Ali. The Institute held Page 01 three orientation programmes and a budget round table in September for Members of the Parlia- ment. Honourable Chairman Senate of Pakistan Senate Sadiq Sanjrani took charge as the new President Board of Governors. This October 2018 Issue of PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest includes invaluable articles on ANALYSIS Pakistan and the FATF grey list; Turkey-US Relations at cross roads and an analysis of the Fi- Supplementary Finance Bill 2018: nance (Supplementary) Bill 2018-19 recently presented in the National Parliament. Like the last Summary and Salient Features couple of issue, we also present a run-down of History of Provincial Assembly of Punjab. Page 07 PIPS team continues to serve over 1254 individual MPs and committees at the Senate of Paki- stan, National Assembly, four provincial assemblies as well as legislative assemblies of Azad Jam- mu and Kashmir and Gilgit Baltistan with legislative, research, capacity building and outreach services. ANALYSIS Please feel free to contact PIPS for any research or briefing papers at [email protected]. Turkey US Relations at Cross- roads Muhammad Rashid Mafzool Zaka Page 13 D.G (Research and Legislation) PARLIAMENTARY HISTORY History of Provincial Assembly of Punjab Page 20 Editorial Board Editor: Muhammad Rashid Mafzool Zaka Sub Editor: Tehseen Khalid Members: Fakiha Mahmoo PIPS organizes New Members Orientation for the newly elected Members of National Assembly of Pakistan, September 26-28, 2018 Muhammad Rizwan Manzoor Provincial Assembly of Punjab (Pakistan) Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2018 OPINION Pakistan under Grey List of Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Maria Irfan PIPS Associate The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is an inter-governmental body established in 1989 by the Ministers of its Member jurisdictions. It was formed at G 7 summit meeting in Paris. The objectives of the FATF are to set standards and promote effective implementation of legal, regulatory and operational measures for combating money laundering, terrorist financing and other related threats to the integrity of the international financial system. 1 FATF issues series of recommendations that, when followed, may help curb terror financing through money laundering. The FATF monitors financial transactions of countries worldwide, reviewing if they have taken the required steps against curtailing the flow of funds to blacklisted organizations i.e. mafias, terrorist outfits, banned groups who face economic sanctions from UN-member countries. Based on these facts, FATF releases a list of countries after its review and sorts them according to their performance against activities they have deemed illegal.2 The FATF’s decision making body, the FATF plenary body, meets three times a year. History of Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Recognizing the threat posed to the banking system and to financial institutions in Paris (1989), the G-7 Heads of State or Government and President of the European Commission convened the Task Force from the G-7 member States, the European Commission and eight other countries. 3 The FATF currently comprises 35 member jurisdictions and 2 regional organizations including China, India, United States, United Kingdom, and Japan.4 The FATF grey list is a short description of the Financial Action Task Force list of Non-Cooperative Countries and Territories (NCCTs).5 This blacklist has been issued by Financial Action Task Force FATF since 2000 and it lists countries which it finds to be non-cooperative in the global fight against money laundering and terrorist financing, calling them non- cooperative countries or territories. FATF and other organizations take an indirect route to evaluate the sensitivity of a country to terror financing by tracking and evaluating their laws and their implementations. Some countries included in this list are; Ethiopia, Iraq, Yemen, Serbia, Syria, Srilanka, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia and Vanuatu.6 Pakistan is placed again in this list on 27 June, 2018. 1 http://www.fatf-gafi.org/countries/#FATF browsed Sept 25, 2018 2 Aitzaz,Hassan. “What is FATF and What Does Pakistan’s Inclusion in Its Grey List Mean.” ProPakistani. Accessed July23,2018 https://propakistani.pk/2018/02/26/fatf-pakistans-inclusion-grey-list-list-mean/ 3 “History of the FATF”. Fatf-gafi. Accessed July24,2018 http://www.fatf-gafi.org/about/historyofthefatf/ 4“FATF Members and Observers”. Fatf-gafi. Accessed July23,2018 http://www.fatf- gafi.org/about/membersandobservers/ 5 “About FATF”. Faf-gafi Accessed July24,2018 http://www.fatf-gafi.org/about/ 6 Usman, Hayat. “Pakistan on FATF’s Grey List-What, Why and Why Now”. Dawn Accessed July24, 2018 https://www.dawn.com/news/1418143 PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 5, Issue: 10 Page 1 Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2018 Pakistan as Member of Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG) The purpose of the Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG) is to ensure the adoption, implementation and enforcement of internationally accepted anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing standards as set out in the FATF Forty Recommendations and FATF Eight Special Recommendations. 7The effort includes assisting countries and territories of the region in enacting laws to deal with the proceeds of crime, mutual legal assistance, confiscation, forfeiture and extradition; providing guidance in setting up systems for reporting and investigating suspicious transactions and helping in the establishment of financial intelligence units. The APG also enables regional factors to be taken into account in the implementation of anti-money laundering measures. Origins of the APG go back to "awareness raising" activities by the FATF in early 1990s as part of its strategy to encourage adoption of money laundering counter-measures throughout the world. In order to achieve more concrete results, Australia agreed to set up a Secretariat for the purpose of obtaining regional commitment and establishing a regional FATF-style body with practical objectives. Subsequently, an agreement was reached in Bangkok in 1997 which created the APG. The first meeting was held in Tokyo in 1998 and then annually thereafter. Following the events of 11 September 2001, the APG expanded its scope to include the countering of terrorist financing. The APG conducts mutual evaluations of its members and holds a periodic workshop on money laundering methods and trends. The APG is supported by a Secretariat, which serves as the focal point for its activities. The APG became an Associate Member of the FATF in 2006. Pakistan is one of the over 41 member countries and 8 observer nations in the APG. Pakistan and FATF Grey List, the History: Pakistan was on grey list previously in 2008 and for three years between 2012 and 2015 but due to its continuous efforts the Task Force removed Pakistan from the list in 2015 after the country agreed to take actions against Hafiz Saeed’s Jamaat-ud-Dawa (JuD), Falah-e- Insaniyat Foundation (FIF) and Lashkare Tayyba.8 Earlier in February 2018, some member countries including USA, UK joined by France and Germany nominated Pakistan to be placed in FATF Grey list during the International Country Risk Guide (ICRG) session which was held a day before the FATF plenary.9 Upon this the advisor to the then Prime Minister, Dr Miftah Ismail offered that Pakistan was ready to submit a report on their concerns and FATF should take their decision based on that. At that time Japan supported Pakistan. ICRG also agreed to that proposal that FATF should take decision based on those measures. China also advised Pakistan that it should sign an agreement with FATF based on its measures to be taken in upcoming three months. The pre plenary meeting ended positively and this resulted in the tweet from the then Defence Minister of Pakistan, Khawaja Asif in which he announced that FATF postponed the decision. However to the surprise of Pakistani authorities FATF decided to place Pakistan on 7 http://www.fatf-gafi.org/pages/members/asiapacificgrouponmoneylaunderingapg.html 8 Shahbaz,Rana. “Pakistan to Go on FATF Terror Financing List in June”. The Express Tribune. Accessed July27,2018 https://tribune.com.pk/story/1643185/1-pakistan-go-fatf-terror-financing-list-june/ 9 Ibid. PIPS Parliamentary Research Digest- Volume: 5, Issue: 10 Page 2 Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services 2018 the Grey list due to continuous pressure from USA and on June, 27 Pakistan was placed in this list due to “strategic deficiencies” in anti-money laundering and terrorism financing. 10 This decision was due to US allegations that Pakistan has not taken any actions against Hafiz Saeed, the mastermind behind Mumbai attacks and Pakistan’s lack of action against terrorist organizations likes Jamaat-ud-daawa, Jaish-e-Muhammad and other sectarian groups. The decision highlighted a weakness that Pakistani courts during conviction were not awarding penalties on charge of terrorism-financing also that Pakistan was unable to control cross border smuggling of cash. After the decision of placing Pakistan on the grey list in the first plenary meeting in February, Pakistan represented a 26 point action plan to FATF prepared by ICRG. After this negotiation Pakistan was formally placed on the grey list in June 2018. If failed to implement this plan, Pakistan would be placed on the “Blacklist.” This ranking in grey list is making the position of Pakistan worse in other indexes.
Recommended publications
  • Senate of Pakistan.CDR
    Role, Functions & Procedures SENATE OF PAKISTAN A Publication of the Senate Secretariat Parliament House Islamabad First Published :2003 Second Edition :2006 Third Edition : 2009 Fourth Edition : 2012 This document has been published with the assistance of SDPD, the Parliamentary Development Program of UNDP. CONTENTS Preface to the Fourth Edition i Parliamentary Terms iii Chapter I INTRODUCTION 01 Chapter II HOUSE AND ITS MEMBERSHIP 07 Chapter III HOUSE PROCEDURE 13 Chapter IV LEGISLATION 19 Chapter V COMMITTEES 39 Chapter VI AMENITIES TO MEMBERS 45 Chapter VII LIBRARY, RESEARCH AND AUTOMATION 51 Chapter VIII THE SECRETARIAT 57 Chapter IX PARLIAMENT BUILDING AND FACILITIES 69 Chapter X INTER PARLIAMENTARY RELATIONS 77 Chapter XI PRESS AND PUBLIC RELATIONS 87 APPENDICES I Parliamentary Customs 93 II Excerpts from the Constitution 97 III Constitutional History of Pakistan 120 IV Heads of State, Government and Legislatures 128 V Federal and Concurrent Legislative Lists Constitution of Pakistan Fourth Schedule 136 VI The Members of Pakistan (Salaries and Allowance) Act, 1974 144 PREFACE The manual, containing information about the relevant Constitutional Provisions, Rules of Procedure and various Statues as well as an overview of structure and functions of the Senate Secretariat has proved to be useful document for understanding the working of the Senate. The utility of manual has increased manifold due to sizeable increase in the total membership of Senate including seventeen reserved seat of lady senators, especially when half of the total membership is elected afresh after every three years. The primary objective of the manual is to compile frequently used parliamentary terms and related information in one document for the benefit of present and new members of the Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • Election of the President of the Inter-Parliamentary Union
    206th session of the Governing Council (Virtual meeting) 1–4 November 2020 Governing Council 9 July 2020 Election of the President of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (Article 19 of the Statutes and Rules 6, 7 and 8 of the Rules of the Governing Council) Candidature of Mr. Muhammad Sadiq Sanjrani (Pakistan) On 9 July 2020, the Secretary General received a communication from the Speaker of the National Assembly of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, submitting the candidature of Mr. Muhammad Sadiq Sanjrani for the office of President of the Inter-Parliamentary Union, which is to be filled at the 206th session of the Governing Council. The text of this communication and the curriculum vitae of Mr. M. Sadiq Sanjrani are to be found in Annexes I and II. E #IPU134 - 2 - ANNEX I Original: English COMMUNICATION ADDRESSED TO THE SECRETARY GENERAL BY THE SPEAKER OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN Islamabad, 9 July 2020 Dear Mr. Secretary General, I am writing to you with reference to the forthcoming election of the President of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) at the 206th session of the Governing Council (virtual meeting) scheduled to be held from 1 to 4 November 2020. On behalf of the Parliament of Pakistan, I am pleased to put forward the candidature of Senator Muhammad Sadiq Sanjrani, Chairman, Senate of Pakistan (Tenure as Member, Senate of Pakistan, from March 2018 to March 2024) for the forthcoming election of the President of the IPU from the Asia-Pacific Group. The portfolio of IPU President is the highest position in the largest and oldest forum of parliaments in the comity of nations.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Bicameralism As a Viable Legislative
    AN ANALYSIS OF BICAMERALISM AS A VIABLE LEGISLATIVE SYSTEM IN PAKISTAN Aminah Gilani Abstract: As a common perception, bicameralism is considered mandatory asset to Federal form of government, while contrary to this perception, the data from April 2014 shows that approximately 41.5% of legislatures around the world practice bicameral legislatures, whereas in Europe alone 64.58% have been noted as unicameral legislatures. In this paper, the researcher reviews and analyzes many of the arguments made on behalf of bicameralism using the data accessible through secondary sources. In, Pakistan bicameralism has become a traditional practice endorsed and legitimized by the constitution of 1973, however, the evolutionary forces of political compulsions require a more experimental approach towards legislative practices in Pakistan. The theoretical model provided by Path-Dependency facilitates this research in understanding the dynamics that obstructs the way of deviation from traditional approach and legislative efficiency in Pakistan. This study is aimed at provoking a debate on more diverse and solution-based ideas towards governance in Pakistan, concluding that it is not the structure of a legislature that decides the prosperity of a state but its efficiency. Keywords: Bicameralism, Upper house, Parliament, Election, National Assembly, Federalism Introduction Senate- usually referred to as the upper house of the legislature is widely regarded as the fundamental pillar of the modern democratic political system. It is also the permanent house; therefore it maintains the continuity of the political process of the state. It is proclaimed as thesymbol of harmony and unanimity, because it is formed on the basis of uniform representation from the respective federating units in the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional & Parliamentary Information
    UNION INTERPARLEMENTAIRE INTER-PARLIAMENTARY UNION CCoonnssttiittuuttiioonnaall && PPaarrlliiaammeennttaarryy IInnffoorrmmaattiioonn Half-yearly Review of the Association of Secretaries General of Parliaments Preparations in Parliament for Climate Change Conference 22 in Marrakech (Abdelouahed KHOUJA, Morocco) National Assembly organizations for legislative support and strengthening the expertise of their staff members (WOO Yoon-keun, Republic of Korea) The role of Parliamentary Committee on Government Assurances in making the executive accountable (Shumsher SHERIFF, India) The role of the House Steering Committee in managing the Order of Business in sittings of the Indonesian House of Representatives (Dr Winantuningtyastiti SWASANANY, Indonesia) Constitutional reform and Parliament in Algeria (Bachir SLIMANI, Algeria) The 2016 impeachment of the Brazilian President (Luiz Fernando BANDEIRA DE MELLO, Brazil) Supporting an inclusive Parliament (Eric JANSE, Canada) The role of Parliament in international negotiations (General debate) The Lok Sabha secretariat and its journey towards a paperless office (Anoop MISHRA, India) The experience of the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies on Open Parliament (Antonio CARVALHO E SILVA NETO) Web TV – improving the score on Parliamentary transparency (José Manuel ARAÚJO, Portugal) Deepening democracy through public participation: an overview of the South African Parliament’s public participation model (Gengezi MGIDLANA, South Africa) The failed coup attempt in Turkey on 15 July 2016 (Mehmet Ali KUMBUZOGLU)
    [Show full text]
  • FWU Journal of Social Sciences, Special Issue, No.4, Winter 2017, 1-11
    FWU Journal of Social Sciences, Special Issue, No.4, Winter 2017, 1-11 Empowering Ethnoregional Minorities and the Federal Bicameralism:Examining the Role of Senate in Pakistan Muhammad Mushtaq University of Gujrat Federations establish power-sharing instituions at the federal level to empower the minority groups. Federal bicameralism is a part of power-sharing mechanisms that promote the shared-rule through allocating equal represention to the minority groups/provinces in the Second Chamber of the Parliament. Though, the federal bicameralism has now become a norm in the contemporary federal experiences, its strength varies across cases. The Pakistani Federation had adopted bicameral legislature in the 1973 Constituion but owing to the parliamentary nature of system, the directly elected Lower House has played an unparalleled role in the legislative and oversight business of the Parliament. However, despite of its lesser role in the polity, the minority groups envision the Senate as a forum that empowers them at the federal level. What the findings about oversight functions of the Senate illustrate is that the Senators belonging to smaller provinces are more vigorous than the Punjabi Senators, by submitting more questions, adjournment motions and call attention motions in the house, which in many ways reflect a more nuanced territorial role of the Senate. Conversely, the voting patterns and party discipline in the House lessen the territorial role of the Senate. But, as the smaller units have a larger voice in the House and the Senate is asserting for greater role, it is more likely that it would dispense more meaningful role in the years ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan's Institutions
    Pakistan’s Institutions: Pakistan’s Pakistan’s Institutions: We Know They Matter, But How Can They We Know They Matter, But How Can They Work Better? Work They But How Can Matter, They Know We Work Better? Edited by Michael Kugelman and Ishrat Husain Pakistan’s Institutions: We Know They Matter, But How Can They Work Better? Edited by Michael Kugelman Ishrat Husain Pakistan’s Institutions: We Know They Matter, But How Can They Work Better? Essays by Madiha Afzal Ishrat Husain Waris Husain Adnan Q. Khan, Asim I. Khwaja, and Tiffany M. Simon Michael Kugelman Mehmood Mandviwalla Ahmed Bilal Mehboob Umar Saif Edited by Michael Kugelman Ishrat Husain ©2018 The Wilson Center www.wilsoncenter.org This publication marks a collaborative effort between the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars’ Asia Program and the Fellowship Fund for Pakistan. www.wilsoncenter.org/program/asia-program fffp.org.pk Asia Program Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20004-3027 Cover: Parliament House Islamic Republic of Pakistan, © danishkhan, iStock THE WILSON CENTER, chartered by Congress as the official memorial to President Woodrow Wilson, is the nation’s key nonpartisan policy forum for tackling global issues through independent research and open dialogue to inform actionable ideas for Congress, the Administration, and the broader policy community. Conclusions or opinions expressed in Center publications and programs are those of the authors and speakers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Center staff, fellows, trustees, advisory groups, or any individuals or organizations that provide financial support to the Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 4Th Parliamentary Year, 2016-17
    14th National Assembly of Pakistan Annual Report 4th Parliamentary Year, 2016-17 National Assembly of Islamic Republic of Pakistan The first and the foremost thing that I would like to emphasize is this --remember that you are now a Sovereign Legislative body and you have got all the powers. It, therefore, places on you the gravest responsibility as to how you should take your decisions. Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah (Presidential Address to the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan on 11th August, 1947.) IV Annual Report 2016-17 Annual Report 2016-17 V LIST OF ACRONYMS AJK Azad Jammu and Kashmir IPU Inter-Parliamentary Union APA Asian Parliamentary Assembly KESC Karachi Electric Supplier Company BOG Board of Governors KPIs Key Performance Indicators CANs Calling Attention Notices KPK Khyber Pakhtunkhwa CARs Central Asian Republics LDC Legislative Drafting Council CPA Commonwealth Parliamentary MLA Member of Legislative Assembly Association CPC Commonwealth Parliamentary MNA Member of National Assembly Conference CPEC China-Pakistan Economic Corridor NASP National Assembly Strategic Plan CSCR Center for Strategic and NESPAK National Engineering Services Contemporary Research Pakistan CSO Civil Society Organization NFC National Finance Commission CSPOC Conference of Speakers and Presiding NGO Non Governmental Organization Officers of the Commonwealth CSTO Collective Security Treaty NIM National Institute of Management Organization CWP Commonwealth Women NPMM National Parliamentary Meeting on Parliamentarians Malnutrition DRI Democracy Reporting
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Pages English
    Dedicated to Parliamentary Excellence SENATORS ORIENTATION HANDBOOK 2009 All rights reserved with Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services, PIPS About the Authors S.No Topic Authors 1. Parliamentary History …...………………………………Daud ur Rahim Malik 2. Constitutional Authority of Senate ……………………..Muhammad Rashid Mafzool Zaka 3. Parliamentarian as a Legislator…………………………Muhammad Rashid Mafzool Zaka 4. Business of the Senate…………………………………...Muhammad Rashid Mafzool Zaka 5. Legislative Calendar and Session……………………….Muhammad Rashid Mafzool Zaka 6. Budget in Pakistan – Parliament’s role…………………Aizaz Asif 7. Legislative Process in the Senate……………………… Muhammad Rashid Mafzool Zaka 8. Legislative Committees in Pakistan……………………Muhammad Rashid Mafzool Zaka 9. Committee Effectiveness……………………………….Aizaz Asif 10. Question Hour in Parliament ………………………...Muhammad Rashid Mafzool Zaka 11. Parliamentary Privilege……………………………….Nadia Batool 12. Executive Legislative Relations………………………Muhammad Rashid Mafzool Zaka 13. Research Support for MNAs…………………………Muhammad Rashid Mafzool Zaka 14. Glossary ………………………………………………Aizaz Asif and Daud ur Rahim Malik The Senate of Pakistan Parliamentary History After independence in August 1947, the first Constituent Assembly of Pakistan, which had been elected in December 1945 in undivided India, was assigned the task of framing the Constitution. This Assembly passed the Objectives Resolution on 12 March 1949, laying down principles which later became a substantive part of the Constitution. However, before it could accomplish the task, the Constituent Assembly was dissolved in October 1954. The second Constituent Assembly, which was convened in May 1955, framed and passed the first Constitution of Pakistan on 29 February 1956. That Constitution, promulgated on 23 March 1956, provided for a parliamentary form of government with a unicameral legislature. From 14 August 1947 to 1st March 1956 the Government of India Act 1935 was retained as the Constitution of Pakistan.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL ASSEMBLY SECRETARIAT $0Ii
    BYSPXCHiTHffiHH NATIONAL ASSEMBLY SECRETARIAT No.F.2( I )r019-PC wing Islamsba4 the 24d JunG,2O2l NOTICf, Secon4 in camere, meetin8 ofthe Porlirmentrry ComDi(.a otr Natiooal S€cufity will be held on TLurrdry, the l"r July, 2021 at 03i00 p.E. in Committe€ Room No. 2, First Floor, Parliarnent House, IslarDabad with tlre followirg agonda:- 1) Briefng on current isgue3 of Nrtionsl Security; .nd 2) Any other item with the permfusioD of tbe Chdr, 2- The Honourable Membe.s and Sp€cial Invitees 6re rcquesbd to kindly mske it convenient to atl€nd the me.ting and in case ofany coflsEaint, a Member may nominate any other Membff witi written audDrization foa the instant mecting. LODlrr) SpecialSecr€rary Tele: No.051-9103192 (l) Mr. Asad Qrber, Spe8k€r, Nrtionrl Assembly ofPrkb.rn Chalrmsr (2) Mian Mulamnad Shehbaz Sharit MNA, Leader of rhe Oppositios in rhe Nationrl Ass.iobly Memtrer (r) Maldrdoom Shah Mahmood HNsain Qureshi. MNA, Minista for Foreigtr A&irs Memb€r (4) S€nator A?rm Khan Swari, Minister for Railways Member (5) Chaudhrry Tariq Bashir Che€ma, MNA, Minister for Housing atrd Works M€mber (6) Sheikt Rastid Ahm€d. MNA, Minister for Interior Member (?) t lr. Bilawal Bhutlo Zadrri, MNA Memb€r (8) lv{r. Asad Mehnood, MNA Memb€r (e) Dr. Khalid Maqbool Siddiqui, MNA Memb€r (10) Mr. Khalid Hussain Magsi, MNA M€rbor (l t) Mr. Muhammad Akhtcr Mengal, MNA Member (12) Mr. Ghous Bux Khan Malar. MNA M€mbcr (13) Mr. Amir Haider Azarn Khan, MNA Melrbcr (14) Narxabzada Shazain Bugti, MNA M€mber (t5) Senator Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Context, Achievements and Challenges
    CONTEXT, ACHIEVEMENTS AND CHALLENGES Table of Contents Acronyms i Foreword v 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Centrality of Parliament in Democratic Governance 1 1.2. Parliaments Across Political Systems 2 1.3. Contextualizing the Decade of Democracy in Pakistan 3 (2008 2018) 1.4. Empowerment and Institutional Development of 9 Parliament 1.5. Report – Decade of Democracy in Pakistan (2008 - 2018) 11 2. How They Fared on Lawmaking? 15 2.1 Introduction 15 2.2 Legislation: Quantitative Dimension 16 2.3 Private Members’ Bills: Pakistan, India and UK 17 2.4 Constitutional Amendments: Revival of 1973 19 Constitution and Beyond 2.5 Gender-sensitive Legislation 23 2.6 Electoral Reform 25 2.7 Failure to Repeal NAB Ordinance 27 2.8 Terrorism 28 2.9 Lawmaking for Rights 30 2.10 Education 32 2.11 Documenting and Publishing Laws 32 2.12 Access to Information 33 2.13 Economy 33 2.14 Justice Sector Reforms 34 3. Parliamentary Oversight of Government 37 3.1. Introduction 37 3.2. Question Hour 37 3.3. Calling Attention Notices 41 3.4. Resolutions 43 3.5. Motions under Rule 259 in National Assembly 48 3.6. Motion under Rule 218 in Senate 49 3.7. Adjournment Motions 49 4. Functioning of Mini Legislature: Parliamentary 53 Committees 4.1. Introduction 53 4.2. Empowerment of Committees 53 4.3. Composition of Committees and Role of Opposition 54 4.4. Public Hearings and Public Petitions 56 4.5. Performance of Committees 57 5. Gender Representation and Parliamentary 65 Performance 5.1 Introduction 65 5.2 State of Women Representation Internationally 66 5.3 Women’s Legislative Representation in Pakistan 68 5.4 Legal Framework for Women’s Representation 69 5.5 Women’s Right to Vote 71 5.6 Women Legislators’ Performance in the National 73 Assembly 5.7.
    [Show full text]
  • PAKISTAN an EXCERPT from the 2015 Global Climate Legislation Study a Review of Climate Change Legislation in 99 Countries
    CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATION IN PAKISTAN AN EXCERPT FROM The 2015 Global Climate Legislation Study A Review of Climate Change Legislation in 99 Countries Michal Nachmany, Sam Fankhauser, Jana Davidová, Nick Kingsmill, Tucker Landesman, Hitomi Roppongi, Philip Schleifer, Joana Setzer, Amelia Sharman, C. Stolle Singleton, Jayaraj Sundaresan and Terry Townshend www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/legislation/ Climate Change Legislation – Pakistan Pakistan Legislative Process The Democratic Islamic Federal Republic of Pakistan has a bicameral parliament. This is composed of the Senate or Upper House and the National Assembly or Lower House. The Senate has 104 seats and members are indirectly elected by provincial assemblies and the territories’ representatives in the National Assembly to serve six-year terms. One half of the representatives are elected every three years. The last Senate election was held in March 2012 and the next one is expected to take place in 2015. The National Assembly has 342 seats of which 272 members are elected for five-year terms by popular vote. There are 60 seats reserved for women and 10 seats for non-Muslims. The last election for the National Assembly was held in May 2013 and the next one is expected to be held in 2018. The President is elected by both Houses of Parliament and the Provincial Assemblies. The Prime Minister, who heads the Cabinet, belongs to the National Assembly. Members of the Cabinet are appointed by the President on the advice of the Prime Minister. Cabinet members are taken from the National Assembly (75%) and the Senate (25%). A bill relating to the Federal Legislative List can be originated in either House.
    [Show full text]
  • Previewing Pak 2018 Gen Elec SPECREP
    Previewing Pakistan’s 2018 General Election ! " Special Report 195 SPECIAL REPORT 195 Previewing Pakistan’s 2018 General Election Rana Banerji" Sushant Sareen" Dr TCA Raghavan" Dr Ashok K Behuria !1 Previewing Pakistan’s 2018 General Election ! " Special Report 195 Contents Synopsis 1" Role of the military and " foreign policy 2" Role of domestic factors 4" PTI’s prospects and the role of " opposition and regional parties 5" PML-N’s prospects and the role of " opposition and regional parties 6" Speakers’ Roundtable and Q&A 8" !2 Previewing Pakistan’s 2018 General Election ! " Special Report 195 Synopsis IPCS hosted a panel discussion on 12 July 2018 featuring four distinguished Pakistan experts—Rana Banerji, Sushant Sareen, Dr TCA Raghavan, and Dr Ashok Behuria—to deliberate the several factors likely to influence the trajectory of the Pakistani general election scheduled for 25 July 2018. This report contains short write-ups authored by the panelists based on their presentations at the discussion, followed by the Speakers' Roundtable and Q&A, both rapporteured by IPCS. !3 Previewing Pakistan’s 2018 General Election ! " Special Report 195 Will the military and foreign policy influence voting in the 2018 National Assembly Election? Why? Rana Banerji Member, IPCS Governing Council; former Special Secretary, Cabinet Secretariat, Government of India One must revisit the Pakistani military’s strategic culture to understand their approach to the democratic process and general elections in Pakistan. The army regards itself as the guardian or supreme defender of the country’s national interests and sovereignty; the only institution which has preserved the security and very survival of the nation against all odds.
    [Show full text]