DOCSLIB.ORG

0825Bridgesdoc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
0825Bridgesdoc FC FI Suff GILLESVILLE HIGHWAY NORTH OCONEE RIVER 99.43749 GILLESVILLE HIGHWAY N OCONEE RIVER 99.43749 US 129 CHATT RIV (LAKE LANIER) 54.60872 SR 13 Alt‐McEVER RD BALUS CREEK 87.05132 CORNELIA ROAD SR 419 (I‐985 US 23) 88.8155 SR 52 FLAT CREEK 99.6205 McEVER RD, 13 ALT FLAT CREEK 96.217 ATHENS STREET SR 419 (I‐985 US 23) 79.04406 I‐985 SBL (US 23) SR 369 98 US 23 (NBL) SOUTHERN RAILROAD 93.89716 US 23 (SBL) SOUTHERN RAILROAD 93.89716 SR 52 CANDLER CREEK 46.81044 SR 52 NORTH OCONEE RIVER 89.44817 SR 284 CHATT RIV (LAKE LANIER) 39.88202 SR 52 EAST FORK LITTLE RIVER 91.87505 SR 52 WEST FORK LITTLE RIVER 56.62302 MUNDY MILL ROAD BALUS CREEK 98.47825 SR 53 SOUTHERN RAILROAD 75.77765 SR 53 CONNECTOR FLAT CREEK 98.33575 SR 53 CONNECTOR SOUTHERN RR‐ SAL RR 86.94993 HUBERT STEPHENS RD WAHOO CREEK 54.43301 BRITT WHITMIRE RD W FORK LITTLE RIV TRIB 92.24275 GREEN CIRCLE EAST FORK LITTLE RIVER 30.80495 WILD SMITH ROAD WEST FORK LITTLE RIVER 99.81998 ODUM SMALLWOOD RD W FORK LITTLE RIV TRIB 99.865 JESS HELTON ROAD WEST FORK LITTLE RIVER 92.25259 NOPONE ROAD EAST FORK LITTLE RIVER 90.72002 CLAUDE PECK ROD EAST FORK LITTLE RIVER 99.77497 BEN PARKS ROAD WAHOO CREEK 70.11501 GEORGE BARNES RD WAHOO CREEK 99.81998 ELACHEE ROAD SR 419 (I‐985 US 23) 44.80997 PLAINVIEW ROAD SR 419 (I‐985 US 23) 79.20419 SR 52 CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER 42.29323 US 129 EAST FORK LITTLE RIVER 57.04798 I‐985 SBL (US 23) SR 53 CONNECTOR 92.3939 OLD OAKWOOD RD BALUS CREEK TRIB. 98.16399 KENIMER ROAD WEST FORK LITTLE RIVER 80.31837 COBB STREET SOUTHERN RAILROAD 15.98 THOMPSON BR ROAD YELLOW CREEK 90.03492 SR 211 CANEY CREEK 98.74579 SR 211 WALNUT CREEK 59.67958 SR 254 FLAT CREEK TRIB. 90.83332 SR 283 EAST FORK LITTLE RIVER 92.35133 SR 283 FLAT CREEK 91.82076 SHOAL CREEK ROAD EUBANK CREEK 61.98923 JOE CHANDLER RD BUFFINGTON CREEK TRIB. 91.99104 I‐985 NBL (US 23) CR 719‐ CSX RAILROAD 79.78442 DORSEY STREET FLAT CREEK 92.21725 MEMORIAL PARK RD FLAT CREEK 99.76899 CR 487 BALUS CREEK 97.77265 MULBERRY STREET FLOWERY BRANCH 92.4755 CASH ROAD MULBERRY CREEK 98.81199 BLACK JACK ROAD MITCHELL CREEK 99.44497 OLIVER ROAD MULBERRY RIVER TRIB. 99.72993 E. REED ROAD CANEY CREEK 99.44497 PINE VALE ROAD CANEY CREEK 99.66699 BAKER ROAD ALLEN CREEK 99.90379 ROY PARKS ROAD ALLEN CREEK 98.37762 LAZY FALLS ROAD BUFFINGTON CREEK 98.90893 WHITEHALL ROAD NORTH OCONEE RIVER 99.964 GILSTRAP MILL RD WAHOO CREEK 99.91588 SR 53 (WBL) CHATT RIV (LAKE LANIER) 78.67796 LAKEVIEW PKWY DUNCAN MILL CREEK 87.39069 GILSTRAP MILL RD WAHOO CREEK TRIB 92.46977 F. GAILEY ROAD EAST FORK LITTLE RIVER 98.98482 HONEYSUCKLE ROAD E FORK LITTLE RIVER 99.72247 ATLANTA HIGHWAY BIG CREEK 91.60525 ATLANTA HIGHWAY SR 419 (I‐985 US 23) 78.34624 ATLANTA HIGHWAY SR 419 (I‐985 US 23) 77.42875 ATLANTA HIGHWAY FLAT CREEK 99.2485 SR 51 SOUTHERN RAILROAD 79.68887 I‐985 NBL (US 23) SR 53 CONNECTOR 92.87918 I‐985 NBL (US 23) S‐2920 SPOUT SPRINGS RD. 91.91719 I‐985 SBL (US 23) S‐2920 SPOUT SPRINGS RD 90.85507 SR 332 WALNUT CREEK 50.36537 PEA RIDGE ROAD MUD CREEK 63.0478 SPOUT SPRINGS RD SHERWOOD CREEK 90.58274 LAWSON‐ROBINSON RD YELLOW CREEK TRIB. 97.86174 WHITE‐SULPHUR RD NORTH OCONEE RIVER 92.14977 OLD CORNELIA HWY NORTH OCONEE RIVER 49.88317 JOE CHANDLER RD NORTH OCONEE RIVER 56.64344 HIGHLAND TERRACE FLAT CREEK 99.778 JOE CHANDLER RD CEDAR CREEK 80.90695 I‐985 NBL (US 23) SR 53 62.7851 I‐985 SBL (US 23) CR 719‐ CSX RAILROAD 90.30486 SR 60 (SBL) CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER 92.9345 HILTON DRIVE FLAT CREEK 99.55598 H. WHITE ROAD WEST FORK LITTLE RIVER 99.865 CAGLE MILL ROAD NORTH OCONEE RIVER 98.90893 MANGRAM MILL RD POND FORK CREEK 38.72707 SR 53 (EBL) CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER 98.197 JIM HOOD ROAD WEST FORK LITTLE RIVER 84.32504 UNION CIRCLE MULBERRY CREEK 99.30475 FULLER ROAD ALLEN CREEK 99.72993 MANGRAM MILL RD POND FORK CREEK TRIB. 46.76564 GREGGS ROAD POND FORK CREEK 99.865 BARRETT ROAD POND FORK CREEK 98.60944 COKER ROAD EAST FORK POND CREEK 99.81998 US 129 POND FORK CREEK TRIB. 90.51367 UNION CHURCH RD MULBERRY RIVER TRIB. 90.72002 US 129 SOUTHERN RWY‐ SCL RR. 64.92112 GAINES FERRY RD SOUTHERN RAILROAD 89.24963 SIMPSON ROAD NORTH OCONEE RIVER 98.81784 SIMPSON ROAD N OCONEE RIVER TRIB. 92.35133 BRYANT QUARTERS RD CANDLER CREEK 99.961 GLADE FARM ROAD FLAT CREEK 62.68126 US 129 (NBL) SR 419 (I‐985 US 23) 76.01198 WHIPPOORWILL RD BUFFINGTON CREEK TRIB. 92.35133 BROOME ROAD NORTH OCONEE RIVER 99.81998 EAST HALL ROAD NORTH OCONEE RIVER 68.47893 DUNAGAN ROAD BUFFINGTON CREEK 98.86339 CEDAR CREEK RD CEDAR CREEK 99.81998 US 129 (SBL) SR 419 (I‐985 US 23) 77.0586 GAINES MILL ROAD N OCONEE RIVER TRIB. 96.88908 TANNER MILL CIR CANEY CREEK 98.88768 SR 283 WAHOO CR (LAKE LANIER) 75.91327 OCONEE CIRCLE NORTH OCONEE RIVER 99.77497 JAKE KEMP ROAD WAHOO CREEK 99.95199 CONNER DRIVE BULL CREEK TRIB. 91.4594 DIXIE DRIVE FLAT CREEK 99.66699 OLD FLOWERY BR RD FLAT CREEK 53.23573 BELTON BRIDGE RD CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER 86.47551 SR 60 (NBL) CHATT RIV (LAKE LANIER) 65.94 SR 13 Alt‐McEVER RD FLOWERY BRANCH (LAKE) 77.5347 BRYANT QUARTERS RD NORTH OCONEE RIVER 29.55167 BOWEN BRIDGE RD FLAT CREEK 99.68488 SPOUT SPRINGS RD LOLLIS CREEK 89.43258 RAMSEY ROAD SOUTHERN RAILROAD 93.94466 THOMPSON BR ROAD SQUIRREL CREEK 88.00929 I‐985 SBL (US 23) SR 53 73.7851 I‐985 NBL (US 23) SR 369 98 WADE ORR ROAD SR 419 (I‐985 US 23) 71.47163 US 129 LIMESTONE CREEK 94.89098 ATLANTA HIGHWAY SOUTHERN RAILROAD 97.82518 FRIENDSHIP ROAD SR 419 (I‐985 US 23) 100 BEVERLY ROAD LIMESTONE CREEK 99.406 STRINGER ROAD EUBANK CREEK 92.30196 SPOUT SPRINGS RD DUNCAN CREEK 97.55338 CENTENNIAL FLAT CREEK 99.55598 LANIER ISLANDS RD LAKE LANIER 75.51505 US 129 EAST FORK LITTLE RIVER 91.73193 SR 211 MULBERRY RIVER 98.65224 PINE VALLEY ROAD BRENAU CREEK 80.12109 FRIENDSHIP ROAD SOUTHERN RAILROAD 96.92509 ATLANTA HIGHWAY FLOWERY BRANCH 83.15376.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • List of TMDL Implementation Plans with Tmdls Organized by Basin
    Latest 305(b)/303(d) List of Streams List of Stream Reaches With TMDLs and TMDL Implementation Plans - Updated June 2011 Total Maximum Daily Loadings TMDL TMDL PLAN DELIST BASIN NAME HUC10 REACH NAME LOCATION VIOLATIONS TMDL YEAR TMDL PLAN YEAR YEAR Altamaha 0307010601 Bullard Creek ~0.25 mi u/s Altamaha Road to Altamaha River Bio(sediment) TMDL 2007 09/30/2009 Altamaha 0307010601 Cobb Creek Oconee Creek to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Cobb Creek Oconee Creek to Altamaha River FC 2012 Altamaha 0307010601 Milligan Creek Uvalda to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 2006 Altamaha 0307010601 Milligan Creek Uvalda to Altamaha River FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Oconee Creek Headwaters to Cobb Creek DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Oconee Creek Headwaters to Cobb Creek FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010602 Ten Mile Creek Little Ten Mile Creek to Altamaha River Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010602 Ten Mile Creek Little Ten Mile Creek to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010603 Beards Creek Spring Branch to Altamaha River Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010603 Five Mile Creek Headwaters to Altamaha River Bio(sediment) TMDL 2007 09/30/2009 Altamaha 0307010603 Goose Creek U/S Rd. S1922(Walton Griffis Rd.) to Little Goose Creek FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010603 Mushmelon Creek Headwaters to Delbos Bay Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010604 Altamaha River Confluence of Oconee and Ocmulgee Rivers to ITT Rayonier
    [Show full text]
  • Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards ( 1) Purpose. The establishment of water quality standards. (2) W ate r Quality Enhancement: (a) The purposes and intent of the State in establishing Water Quality Standards are to provide enhancement of water quality and prevention of pollution; to protect the public health or welfare in accordance with the public interest for drinking water supplies, conservation of fish, wildlife and other beneficial aquatic life, and agricultural, industrial, recreational, and other reasonable and necessary uses and to maintain and improve the biological integrity of the waters of the State. ( b) The following paragraphs describe the three tiers of the State's waters. (i) Tier 1 - Existing instream water uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing uses shall be maintained and protected. (ii) Tier 2 - Where the quality of the waters exceed levels necessary to support propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife and recreation in and on the water, that quality shall be maintained and protected unless the division finds, after full satisfaction of the intergovernmental coordination and public participation provisions of the division's continuing planning process, that allowing lower water quality is necessary to accommodate important economic or social development in the area in which the waters are located.
    [Show full text]
  • Streamflow Maps of Georgia's Major Rivers
    GEORGIA STATE DIVISION OF CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY GARLAND PEYTON, Director THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Information Circular 21 STREAMFLOW MAPS OF GEORGIA'S MAJOR RIVERS by M. T. Thomson United States Geological Survey Prepared cooperatively by the Geological Survey, United States Department of the Interior, Washington, D. C. ATLANTA 1960 STREAMFLOW MAPS OF GEORGIA'S MAJOR RIVERS by M. T. Thomson Maps are commonly used to show the approximate rates of flow at all localities along the river systems. In addition to average flow, this collection of streamflow maps of Georgia's major rivers shows features such as low flows, flood flows, storage requirements, water power, the effects of storage reservoirs and power operations, and some comparisons of streamflows in different parts of the State. Most of the information shown on the streamflow maps was taken from "The Availability and use of Water in Georgia" by M. T. Thomson, S. M. Herrick, Eugene Brown, and others pub­ lished as Bulletin No. 65 in December 1956 by the Georgia Department of Mines, Mining and Geo­ logy. The average flows reported in that publication and sho\vn on these maps were for the years 1937-1955. That publication should be consulted for detailed information. More recent streamflow information may be obtained from the Atlanta District Office of the Surface Water Branch, Water Resources Division, U. S. Geological Survey, 805 Peachtree Street, N.E., Room 609, Atlanta 8, Georgia. In order to show the streamflows and other features clearly, the river locations are distorted slightly, their lengths are not to scale, and some features are shown by block-like patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Maximum Daily Load Evaluation for Seventy-Two Stream Segments
    Total Maximum Daily Load Evaluation for Seventy-Two Stream Segments in the Oconee River Basin for Fecal Coliform Submitted to: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia Submitted by: The Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Atlanta, Georgia January 2007 Total Maximum Daily Load Evaluation January 2007 Oconee River Basin (Fecal Coliform) Table of Contents Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Watershed Description......................................................................................................1 1.3 Water Quality Standard.....................................................................................................5 2.0 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................... 15 3.0 SOURCE ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................... 16 3.1 Point Source Assessment ............................................................................................... 16 3.2 Nonpoint Source Assessment........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hendricks, A.S. 2000. the Conservation and Restoration of the Robust Redhorse, Moxostoma Robustum, Volume 2. Report
    The Conservation and Restoration of the Robust Redhorse Moxostoma robustum Volume 2 April 2000 prepared for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426 prepared by A.S. Hendricks Georgia Power Company Environmental Laboratory Smyrna, Georgia ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was based on the work of many individuals and organizations that form the Robust Redhorse Conservation Committee. The author has attempted to identify cooperating organizations, but not necessarily individuals, where appropriate within the body of this report. Special thanks are due to the hatchery managers and personnel that contributed to the successful culture of robust redhorse, and also to the organizations that provided funding, services, and materials. The author also thanks the individuals that provided helpful comments and suggestions on a draft of this report. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION……………………………………………... 4 1.1 Sinclair Project…………………………………………….. 4 1.2 Robust Redhorse (Moxostoma robustum)……………….. 5 2. ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES……………………….. 7 2.1 Robust Redhorse Conservation Committee……………… 7 · MOU Renewal……………………………………………… 7 · Elections…………………………………………………….. 8 · Technical Advisory Group (TAG)………………………… 8 · Development of Culture Protocols………………………… 10 · Conservation Strategy……………………………………… 10 · Conservation Agreement…………………………………… 11 · Robust Redhorse Aquarium Exhibit……..……………….. 12 · Robust Redhorse Symposia……………………………….. 12 2.2 Flow Advisory Team for the Oconee River……………… 13 · Negotiated Flow Agreement………………………………. 13 · Flow Suitability…………………………………………….. 14 3. CONSERVATION STATUS AND ACTIONS………… 16 3.1 Status of the Oconee River Population…………………….. 16 3.2 Surveys for Additional Populations………………………... 17 · Savannah River, GA/SC…………………………………….. 17 · Ocmulgee River, GA………………………………………… 20 · Ogeechee River, GA…………………………………………. 20 · Pee Dee, River, NC/SC………………………………………. 20 · Broad River, SC……………………………………………… 21 3.3 Research Summary…..……………………………………… 21 · Effects of Temperature and Flow………………………..….
    [Show full text]
  • Stream-Temperature Charcteristics in Georgia
    STREAM-TEMPERATURE CHARACTERISTICS IN GEORGIA U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Prepared in cooperation with the GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4203 STREAM-TEMPERATURE CHARACTERISTICS IN GEORGIA By T.R. Dyar and S.J. Alhadeff ______________________________________________________________________________ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4203 Prepared in cooperation with GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION Atlanta, Georgia 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 3039 Amwiler Road, Suite 130 Denver Federal Center Peachtree Business Center Box 25286 Atlanta, GA 30360-2824 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Page Abstract . 1 Introduction . 1 Purpose and scope . 2 Previous investigations. 2 Station-identification system . 3 Stream-temperature data . 3 Long-term stream-temperature characteristics. 6 Natural stream-temperature characteristics . 7 Regression analysis . 7 Harmonic mean coefficient . 7 Amplitude coefficient. 10 Phase coefficient . 13 Statewide harmonic equation . 13 Examples of estimating natural stream-temperature characteristics . 15 Panther Creek . 15 West Armuchee Creek . 15 Alcovy River . 18 Altamaha River . 18 Summary of stream-temperature characteristics by river basin . 19 Savannah River basin . 19 Ogeechee River basin. 25 Altamaha River basin. 25 Satilla-St Marys River basins. 26 Suwannee-Ochlockonee River basins . 27 Chattahoochee River basin. 27 Flint River basin. 28 Coosa River basin. 29 Tennessee River basin . 31 Selected references. 31 Tabular data . 33 Graphs showing harmonic stream-temperature curves of observed data and statewide harmonic equation for selected stations, figures 14-211 .
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Integrated 305(B)/303(D) List
    2020 Integrated 305(b)/303(d) List - Streams Reach Name/ID Reach Location/County River Basin/ Assessment/ Cause/ Size/Unit Category/ Notes Use Data Provider Source Priority Alex Creek Mason Cowpen Branch to Altamaha Not Supporting DO 3 4a TMDL completed DO 2002. Altamaha River GAR030701060503 Wayne Fishing 1,55,10 NP Miles Altamaha River Confluence of Oconee and Altamaha Supporting 72 1 TMDL completed Fish Tissue (Mercury) 2002. Ocmulgee Rivers to ITT Rayonier GAR030701060401 Appling, Wayne, Jeff Davis Fishing 1,55 Miles Altamaha River ITT Rayonier to Altamaha Assessment 20 3 TMDL completed Fish Tissue (Mercury) 2002. More Penholoway Creek Pending data need to be collected and evaluated before it GAR030701060402 Wayne Fishing 10,55 Miles can be determined whether the designated use of Fishing is being met. Altamaha River Penholoway Creek to Altamaha Supporting 27 1 Butler River GAR030701060501 Wayne, Glynn, McIntosh Fishing 1,55 Miles Beards Creek Chapel Creek to Spring Altamaha Not Supporting Bio F 7 4a TMDL completed Bio F 2017. Branch GAR030701060308 Tattnall, Long Fishing 4 NP Miles Beards Creek Spring Branch to Altamaha Not Supporting Bio F 11 4a TMDL completed Bio F in 2012. Altamaha River GAR030701060301 Tattnall Fishing 1,55,10,4 NP, UR Miles Big Cedar Creek Griffith Branch to Little Altamaha Assessment 5 3 This site has a narrative rank of fair for Cedar Creek Pending macroinvertebrates. Waters with a narrative rank GAR030701070108 Washington Fishing 59 Miles of fair will remain in Category 3 until EPD completes the reevaluation of the metrics used to assess macroinvertebrate data. Big Cedar Creek Little Cedar Creek (at Altamaha Not Supporting FC 6 5 EPD needs to determine the "natural DO" for the Donovan Hwy) to Little area before a use assessment is made.
    [Show full text]
  • False Dichotomy Between Growth and Clean Water? the Harpeth River Experience with Citizen Suits and Beyond
    River Management Society Supporting Professionals Who Study, Protect, and Manage RMS SPRING 2017 VOLUME 30, NO. 1 North America’s Rivers Southeast Focus RMS Pro-Purchase News..................... 4 Virginia’s Scenic Rivers ........................ 6 Restoring the Mulberry River ................ 8 Tennessee Wildlife Federation Gift ....... 9 The Obion Basin Fight ........................ 10 Family Fun on the Pascagoula ........... 13 Tennessee River Basin Network......... 14 Conservation Easements - A Tool ....... 15 Bama’s Bone Dry ................................ 16 Wonks, Water, Walls, and... .............. 18 Georgia Water Trails ........................... 21 San Antonio River Authority ................ 24 RMS Chapter Updates ....................... 27 Innovative Tennessee River Project ... 28 Google Earth aerial image of the Franklin sewer plant and Harpeth River. False Dichotomy Between Growth and Clean Water? The Harpeth River Experience with Citizen Suits and Beyond by James M. Redwine The State Scenic Harpeth River, Greater Founded in 1999, the Harpeth River So often, the choice is portrayed to be Nashville, and the Harpeth River Watershed Association is a 501(c)(3) between clean water and growth, with Watershed Association not-for-profit, science-based conservation clean water inevitably the loser. The organization dedicated to protecting the Harpeth River Watershed Association The Harpeth River is among the State Scenic Harpeth River and clean (HRWA) does not believe that this always unique freshwater river systems of the water in Tennessee. To protect the river has to be the case. Rather, HRWA’s recent Southeast. These systems contain some and effect change, HRWA collaborates experience with a citizen suit under the of the greatest variety of aquatic life with landowners, businesses, community, federal Clean Water Act (CWA) (and its in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Appendix
    Technical Appendix Question 64.a – Water– Water Quality Quality and and Quantity Quantity Protection Protection - Location- Location A. The project is located in a Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 12 watershed identified by the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (GAEPD) as a priority watershed for water quality purposes. Resource: Map and list of priority watersheds (Attachment 1). If the project falls into a purple area on the map, then it meets this category. Additional Information: Current Approved Georgia Nonpoint Source Management Plan. https://epd.georgia.gov/nonpoint-source-program Contact Person: Joy Hinkle, EPD Watershed Protection Branch Grants Unit Manager, (404) 651-8532 or [email protected]. B. The project is located in a HUC-12 or equivalent size area identified as impacted by or sensitive to hydrologic alteration. Resource: The Capacity Use Areas and Restricted Use Areas identified by GAEPD in the 2006 Flint River Basin Plan (https://epd.georgia.gov/georgia-flint-river-basin-plan), or a similar document. Please refer to pages 23-29 of the Flint River Basin Plan. If the project is located in one of the yellow or pink areas in Figures 0.2 – 0.5, then it meets this category. See Attachment 2 for excerpted Figures from this Plan. Contact Person: Jennifer Welte, EPD Watershed Protection Branch, (404) 463-1694 or [email protected]. C. The project is located in a HUC-12watershed identified by GAEPD as a healthy watershed. Resource: The most recent approved Georgia 305(b)/303(d) list, as provided on this page: https://epd.georgia.gov/water-quality-georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Integrated 305(B)
    2018 Integrated 305(b)/303(d) List - Streams Reach Name/ID Reach Location/County River Basin/ Assessment/ Cause/ Size/Unit Category/ Notes Use Data Provider Source Priority Alex Creek Mason Cowpen Branch to Altamaha Not Supporting DO 3 4a TMDL completed DO 2002. Altamaha River GAR030701060503 Wayne Fishing 1,55,10 NP Miles Altamaha River Confluence of Oconee and Altamaha Supporting 72 1 TMDL completed TWR 2002. Ocmulgee Rivers to ITT Rayonier GAR030701060401 Appling, Wayne, Jeff Davis Fishing 1,55 Miles Altamaha River ITT Rayonier to Penholoway Altamaha Assessment 20 3 TMDL completed TWR 2002. More data need to Creek Pending be collected and evaluated before it can be determined whether the designated use of Fishing is being met. GAR030701060402 Wayne Fishing 10,55 Miles Altamaha River Penholoway Creek to Butler Altamaha Supporting 27 1 River GAR030701060501 Wayne, Glynn, McIntosh Fishing 1,55 Miles Beards Creek Chapel Creek to Spring Branch Altamaha Not Supporting Bio F 7 4a TMDL completed Bio F 2017. GAR030701060308 Tattnall, Long Fishing 4 NP Miles Beards Creek Spring Branch to Altamaha Altamaha Not Supporting Bio F 11 4a TMDL completed Bio F in 2012. River GAR030701060301 Tattnall Fishing 1,55,10,4 NP, UR Miles Big Cedar Creek Griffith Branch to Little Cedar Altamaha Assessment 5 3 This site has a narrative rank of fair for Creek Pending macroinvertebrates. Waters with a narrative rank of fair will remain in Category 3 until EPD completes the reevaluation of the metrics used to assess macroinvertebrate data. GAR030701070108 Washington Fishing 59 Miles Big Cedar Creek Little Cedar Creek to Ohoopee Altamaha Not Supporting DO, FC 3 4a TMDLs completed DO 2002 & FC (2002 & 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan for the Oconee River Robust Redhorse Population
    MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE OCONEE RIVER ROBUST REDHORSE POPULATION Photo courtesy of J. Evans, Georgia Department of Natural Resources Oconee River Technical Working Group October 2010 MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE OCONEE RIVER ROBUST REDHORSE POPULATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………….. 1 Background………………………………………………………………………………... 1 1.0 Management Goals…………...………………………………………………………. 3 2.0 Goal Attainment Criteria………………...…………………………………………... 3 3.0 Biology and Historic Status of Robust Redhorse in the Oconee River………...….. 3 4.0 Management Unit……………...……………………………………………………… 8 5.0 Management History………...……………………………………………………….. 11 6.0 Management Objectives to Date………...…………………………………………… 12 7.0 Future Management Objectives and Tasks………………...……………………….. 12 7.1 Improve knowledge of biological requirements………...………………………… 13 7.2 Monitor the status of the Oconee River population and compare with other populations…...……………………………………………………………………… 14 7.3 Conserve the status of the Oconee River population…...………………………… 15 7.4 Maintain refugial populations…………………..…………………………………. 17 7.5 Create a schedule for revisiting this Oconee River Management Plan……..…... 17 8.0 Literature Cited……………...………………………………………………………... 18 MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE OCONEE RIVER ROBUST REDHORSE POPULATION Executive Summary Since 1995, the Robust Redhorse Conservation Committee (RRCC) has been working to restore and conserve robust redhorse populations in their native Atlantic slope drainages in Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina. The RRCC
    [Show full text]
  • CSRA Regionally Important Resources Plan
    CENTRAL SAVANNAH RIVER AREA REGIONAL COMMISSION Regionally Important Resources Plan Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................4 Methodology .......................................................................................................................................4 Natural Resources ..............................................................................................................................7 Natural Resources: Parks & Forested Areas .............................................................................9 Magnolia Springs State Park ................................................................................................. 11 Elijah Clark State Park ............................................................................................................ 12 A.H. Stephens Memorial State Park ..................................................................................... 13 Hamburg State Park ................................................................................................................ 14 Mistletoe State Park ................................................................................................................ 15 Natural Resources: Wildlife Management Areas .................................................................. 17 Clarks Hill Wildlife Management Area ............................................................................... 18 Di-Lane
    [Show full text]