DOCSLIB.ORG

WISCONSIN STANDARDS for Science

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WISCONSIN STANDARDS for Science WISCONSIN STANDARDS FOR Science WisconsinWisconsin Department Department ofof Public Public Instruction Instruction WISCONSIN STANDARDS FOR Science Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Carolyn Stanford Taylor, State Superintendent Madison, Wisconsin This publication is available from: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction 125 South Webster Street Madison, WI 53703 (608) 266-8960 http://dpi.wi.gov/science November 2017 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction The Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction does not discriminate on the basis of sex, race, color, religion, creed, age, national origin, ancestry, pregnancy, marital status or parental status, sexual orientation, or ability and provides equal access to the Boy Scouts of America and other designated youth groups. Wisconsin Standards for Science ii Table of Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... vi Section I: Wisconsin’s Approach to Academic Standards ........................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of the Document ...................................................................................................................................................................... 2 What Are Academic Standards? .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Relating the Academic Standards to All Students ......................................................................................................................... 4 Ensuring a Process for Student Success ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Section II: Wisconsin Standards for Science ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 What is Science Education? .................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Science Education in Wisconsin .......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Standards Structure ................................................................................................................................................................................ 10 Section III: Standards .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Crosscutting Concepts .......................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Science and Engineering Practices .................................................................................................................................................... 26 Disciplinary Core Idea: Life Science ................................................................................................................................................... 49 Disciplinary Core Idea: Physical Science .......................................................................................................................................... 63 Disciplinary Core Idea: Earth and Space Science .......................................................................................................................... 78 Disciplinary Core Idea: Engineering, Technology, and the Application of Science (ETS) ................................................ 89 Section IV: Disciplinary Literacy: Literacy for Learning in Science ............................................................................................................. 103 What is Disciplinary Literacy? .............................................................................................................................................................. 104 Why is Disciplinary Literacy Important? .......................................................................................................................................... 104 Wisconsin Foundations for Disciplinary Literacy ......................................................................................................................... 106 What Research and Resources Are Available? .............................................................................................................................. 117 Wisconsin Standards for Science iii Foreword On November 13, 2017, I formally adopted the Wisconsin Standards for Science. This revised set of academic standards provides a foundational framework that identifies what students should know and be able to do in science. The adoption of the Wisconsin Standards for Science was part of a concerted effort led by Wisconsin educators and stakeholders who shared their expertise in science and teaching from kindergarten through higher education. The public and legislature provided feedback for the writing committee to consider as part of Wisconsin’s Academic Standards review and revision process. Science is an essential part of a comprehensive PK-12 education for all students. The knowledge, techniques, and citizenry skills gained through science education in Wisconsin schools support the overall goal of helping all students become college and career ready. Scientific literacy is a critical element of being able to make sense of the world around us, including the abundant information shared in our ever-changing world. The knowledge and skills described provide a framework with actionable indicators for science classroom experiences. The key goal of the standards is for students make sense of phenomena and solve problems using scientific content understanding, practices, and ways of thinking. Teaching content for the purpose of “covering” a set range of topics is not the intent of these standards; instead, as research suggests, students should be learning scientific ideas through deeply exploring scientific phenomena and solving culturally relevant, local problems. The Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction will continue to build on this work to support implementation of the standards with resources for the field. I am excited to share the Wisconsin Standards for Science, which aim to build science skills, knowledge, ways of thinking, and engagement opportunities for all Wisconsin students. Tony Evers, PhD State Superintendent Wisconsin Standards for Science iv Acknowledgements The Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (DPI) wishes to acknowledge the ongoing work, commitment, and various contributions of individuals to revise our state’s academic standards for science. Thank you to the State Superintendent’s Standards Review Council for their work and guidance through the standards process. A special thanks to the Science Writing Committee for taking on this important project that will shape the classrooms of today and tomorrow. Thanks to the many staff members across the division and other teams at DPI who have contributed their time and talent to this project. Finally, a special thanks to Wisconsin educators, businesspeople, parents, and citizens who provided comment and feedback to drafts of these standards. Wisconsin Standards for Science Writing Team Co-Chairs: Eric Brunsell, Associate Professor, UW–Oshkosh; Chief Operations Officer, WI Society of Science Teachers Christine Pratt, Coordinator of Science, Kenosha Unified SD DPI Liaison: Kevin J. B. Anderson, Science Education Consultant, Teaching and Learning Sarah Adumat Becca Franzen Karen Mesmer Patti Schaefer Oshkosh Area SD UW-Stevens Point Independent Consultant Madison Metropolitan SD David Bergerson Jay Garvey Shah Emily Miller Hope Schultz WI Rapids Public Schools Sun Prairie SD UW–Madison Promega Tony Borden Adam Keeton Kevin Niemi Robert Shannon Lakeland Union HS Eau Claire Area SD UW–Madison and WSST Edgewood HS Juan Botella Ryan King Dennis Rohr Jennifer Wilfrid Monona Grove HS Waunakee Area SD Seymour SD and WESTA WCER and WIDA Kathy Cady Annie Kotenberg Rochelle Sandrin Winneconne HS Oshkosh Corporation Milwaukee Public Schools Faith Fitzpatrick Mike LeDocq Kaleb Santy USGS Water Sciences Western Technical College Pulaski SD Wisconsin Standards for Science v Department of Public Instruction, Academic Standards • John W. Johnson, Director, Literacy and Mathematics, and Director for Academic Standards • Meri Annin, Lead Visual Communications Designer • Marci Glaus, Strategic Communications Consultant • David McHugh, Strategic Planning and Professional Learning Consultant Department of Public Instruction Leaders • Sheila Briggs, Assistant State Superintendent, Division of Academic Excellence • Emilie Amundson, Chief of Staff, Office of the State Superintendent • Scott Jones, Special Assistant, Office of the State
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Science Standards
    SCIENCE It is the policy of the Oklahoma State Department of Education (OSDE) not to discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, gender, national origin, age, or disability in its programs or employment practices as required by Title VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Civil rights compliance inquiries related to the OSDE may be directed to the Affirmative Action Officer, Room 111, 2500 North Lincoln Boulevard, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105-4599, telephone number (405) 522-4930; or, the United States Department of Education’s Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights. Inquires or concerns regarding compliance with Title IX by local school districts should be presented to the local school district Title IX coordinator. This publication, printed by the State Department of Education Printing Services, is issued by the Oklahoma State Department of Education as authorized by 70 O.S. § 3-104. Five hundred copies have been prepared using Title I, Part A, School Improvement funds at a cost of $.15 per copy. Copies have been deposited with the Publications Clearinghouse of the Oklahoma Department of Libraries. DECEMBER 2013. SCIENCE Table of Contents 5-8 Introduction 9 K-5 Overview 10-18 ■ KINDERGARTEN 19-28 ■ 1ST GRADE 29-39 ■ 2ND GRADE 40-54 ■ 3RD GRADE 55-68 ■ 4TH GRADE 69-82 ■ 5TH GRADE 83 6-12 Overview 84-101 ■ 6TH GRADE 102-119 ■ 7TH GRADE 120-137 ■ 8TH GRADE 138-152 ■ PHYSICAL SCIENCE 153-165 ■ CHEMISTRY 166-181 ■ PHYSICS 182-203 ■ BIOLOGY I 204-219 ■ EARTH & SPACE SCIENCE 220-235 ■ ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE Introduction Science uses observation and experimentation to explain natural phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Framework to Reinforce Evidence Synthesis Features in Cloud-Based Systematic Review Tools
    applied sciences Article A Comprehensive Framework to Reinforce Evidence Synthesis Features in Cloud-Based Systematic Review Tools Tatiana Person 1,* , Iván Ruiz-Rube 1 , José Miguel Mota 1 , Manuel Jesús Cobo 1 , Alexey Tselykh 2 and Juan Manuel Dodero 1 1 Department of Informatics Engineering, University of Cadiz, 11519 Puerto Real, Spain; [email protected] (I.R.-R.); [email protected] (J.M.M.); [email protected] (M.J.C.); [email protected] (J.M.D.) 2 Department of Information and Analytical Security Systems, Institute of Computer Technologies and Information Security, Southern Federal University, 347922 Taganrog, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Systematic reviews are powerful methods used to determine the state-of-the-art in a given field from existing studies and literature. They are critical but time-consuming in research and decision making for various disciplines. When conducting a review, a large volume of data is usually generated from relevant studies. Computer-based tools are often used to manage such data and to support the systematic review process. This paper describes a comprehensive analysis to gather the required features of a systematic review tool, in order to support the complete evidence synthesis process. We propose a framework, elaborated by consulting experts in different knowledge areas, to evaluate significant features and thus reinforce existing tool capabilities. The framework will be used to enhance the currently available functionality of CloudSERA, a cloud-based systematic review Citation: Person, T.; Ruiz-Rube, I.; Mota, J.M.; Cobo, M.J.; Tselykh, A.; tool focused on Computer Science, to implement evidence-based systematic review processes in Dodero, J.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Mothers in Science
    The aim of this book is to illustrate, graphically, that it is perfectly possible to combine a successful and fulfilling career in research science with motherhood, and that there are no rules about how to do this. On each page you will find a timeline showing on one side, the career path of a research group leader in academic science, and on the other side, important events in her family life. Each contributor has also provided a brief text about their research and about how they have combined their career and family commitments. This project was funded by a Rosalind Franklin Award from the Royal Society 1 Foreword It is well known that women are under-represented in careers in These rules are part of a much wider mythology among scientists of science. In academia, considerable attention has been focused on the both genders at the PhD and post-doctoral stages in their careers. paucity of women at lecturer level, and the even more lamentable The myths bubble up from the combination of two aspects of the state of affairs at more senior levels. The academic career path has academic science environment. First, a quick look at the numbers a long apprenticeship. Typically there is an undergraduate degree, immediately shows that there are far fewer lectureship positions followed by a PhD, then some post-doctoral research contracts and than qualified candidates to fill them. Second, the mentors of early research fellowships, and then finally a more stable lectureship or career researchers are academic scientists who have successfully permanent research leader position, with promotion on up the made the transition to lectureships and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • How Science Works
    PB 1 How science works The Scientific Method is traditionally presented in the first chapter of science text- books as a simple recipe for performing scientific investigations. Though many use- ful points are embodied in this method, it can easily be misinterpreted as linear and “cookbook”: pull a problem off the shelf, throw in an observation, mix in a few ques- tions, sprinkle on a hypothesis, put the whole mixture into a 350° experiment—and voila, 50 minutes later you’ll be pulling a conclusion out of the oven! That might work if science were like Hamburger Helper®, but science is complex and cannot be re- duced to a single, prepackaged recipe. The linear, stepwise representation of the process of science is simplified, but it does get at least one thing right. It captures the core logic of science: testing ideas with evidence. However, this version of the scientific method is so simplified and rigid that it fails to accurately portray how real science works. It more accurately describes how science is summarized after the fact—in textbooks and journal articles—than how sci- ence is actually done. The simplified, linear scientific method implies that scientific studies follow an unvarying, linear recipe. But in reality, in their work, scientists engage in many different activities in many different sequences. Scientific investigations often involve repeating the same steps many times to account for new information and ideas. The simplified, linear scientific method implies that science is done by individual scientists working through these steps in isolation. But in reality, science depends on interactions within the scientific community.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Science Reading List
    Philosophy of Science Area Comprehensive Exam Reading List Revised September 2011 Exam Format: Students will have four hours to write answers to four questions, chosen from a list of approximately 20-30 questions organized according to topic: I. General Philosophy of Science II. History of Philosophy of Science III. Special Topics a. Philosophy of Physics b. Philosophy of Biology c. Philosophy of Mind / Cognitive Science d. Logic and Foundations of Mathematics Students are required to answer a total of three questions from sections I and II (at least one from each section), and one question from section III. For each section, we have provided a list of core readings—mostly journal articles and book chapters—that are representative of the material with which we expect you to be familiar. Many of these readings will already be familiar to you from your coursework and other reading. Use this as a guide to filling in areas in which you are less well- prepared. Please note, however, that these readings do not constitute necessary or sufficient background to pass the comp. The Philosophy of Science area committee assumes that anyone who plans to write this exam has a good general background in the area acquired through previous coursework and independent reading. Some anthologies There are several good anthologies of Philosophy of Science that will be useful for further background (many of the articles listed below are anthologized; references included in the list below). Richard Boyd, Philip Gasper, and J.D. Trout, eds., The Philosophy of Science (MIT Press, 991). Martin Curd and J.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download Starting with Science Strategies for Introducing Young Children to Inquiry 1St Edition Ebook
    STARTING WITH SCIENCE STRATEGIES FOR INTRODUCING YOUNG CHILDREN TO INQUIRY 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Marcia Talhelm Edson | 9781571108074 | | | | | Starting with Science Strategies for Introducing Young Children to Inquiry 1st edition PDF Book The presentation of the material is as good as the material utilizing star trek analogies, ancient wisdom and literature and so much more. Using Multivariate Statistics. Michael Gramling examines the impact of policy on practice in early childhood education. Part of a series on. Schauble and colleagues , for example, found that fifth grade students designed better experiments after instruction about the purpose of experimentation. For example, some suggest that learning about NoS enables children to understand the tentative and developmental NoS and science as a human activity, which makes science more interesting for children to learn Abd-El-Khalick a ; Driver et al. Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. The authors begin with theory in a cultural context as a foundation. What makes professional development effective? Frequently, the term NoS is utilised when considering matters about science. This book is a documentary account of a young intern who worked in the Reggio system in Italy and how she brought this pedagogy home to her school in St. Taking Science to School answers such questions as:. The content of the inquiries in science in the professional development programme was based on the different strands of the primary science curriculum, namely Living Things, Energy and Forces, Materials and Environmental Awareness and Care DES Exit interview. Begin to address the necessity of understanding other usually peer positions before they can discuss or comment on those positions.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Science and History of Technology (Class Q, R, S, T, and Applicable Z)
    LIBRARY OF CONGRESS COLLECTIONS POLICY STATEMENTS History of Science and History of Technology (Class Q, R, S, T, and applicable Z) Contents I. Scope II. Research strengths III. General collecting policy IV. Best editions and preferred formats V. Acquisitions sources: current and future VI. Collecting levels I. Scope This Collections Policy Statement covers all of the subclasses of Science and Technology and treats the history of these disciplines together. In a certain sense, most of the materials in Q, R, S, and T are part of the history of science and technology. The Library has extensive resources in the history of medicine and agriculture, but many years ago a decision was made that the Library should not intensively collect materials in clinical medicine and technical agriculture, as they are subject specialties of the National Library of Medicine and the National Agricultural Library, respectively. In addition, some of the numerous abstracting and indexing services, catalogs of other scientific and technical collections and libraries, specialized bibliographies, and finding aids for the history of science and technology are maintained in class Z. See the list of finding aids online: http://findingaids.loc.gov/. II. Research strengths 1. General The Library’s collections are robust in both the history of science and the history of technology. Both collections comprise two major elements: the seminal works of science and technology themselves, and historiographies on notable scientific and technological works. The former comprise the original classic works of science and technology as they were composed by the men and women who ushered in the era of modern science and invention.
    [Show full text]
  • Multidisciplinary Design Project Engineering Dictionary Version 0.0.2
    Multidisciplinary Design Project Engineering Dictionary Version 0.0.2 February 15, 2006 . DRAFT Cambridge-MIT Institute Multidisciplinary Design Project This Dictionary/Glossary of Engineering terms has been compiled to compliment the work developed as part of the Multi-disciplinary Design Project (MDP), which is a programme to develop teaching material and kits to aid the running of mechtronics projects in Universities and Schools. The project is being carried out with support from the Cambridge-MIT Institute undergraduate teaching programe. For more information about the project please visit the MDP website at http://www-mdp.eng.cam.ac.uk or contact Dr. Peter Long Prof. Alex Slocum Cambridge University Engineering Department Massachusetts Institute of Technology Trumpington Street, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Cambridge. Cambridge MA 02139-4307 CB2 1PZ. USA e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] tel: +44 (0) 1223 332779 tel: +1 617 253 0012 For information about the CMI initiative please see Cambridge-MIT Institute website :- http://www.cambridge-mit.org CMI CMI, University of Cambridge Massachusetts Institute of Technology 10 Miller’s Yard, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Mill Lane, Cambridge MA 02139-4307 Cambridge. CB2 1RQ. USA tel: +44 (0) 1223 327207 tel. +1 617 253 7732 fax: +44 (0) 1223 765891 fax. +1 617 258 8539 . DRAFT 2 CMI-MDP Programme 1 Introduction This dictionary/glossary has not been developed as a definative work but as a useful reference book for engi- neering students to search when looking for the meaning of a word/phrase. It has been compiled from a number of existing glossaries together with a number of local additions.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Academic Standards Over the Course of the Cyclical Review Process and Their Efforts and Input Are Appreciated
    SOUTH CAROLINA ACADEMIC STANDARDS AND PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR SCIENCE Mick Zais, Ph.D. State Superintendent of Education South Carolina Department of Education Columbia, South Carolina This document approved by Education Oversight Committee and State Board of Education Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ iii Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 Academic Standards and Performance Indicators for Science Kindergarten .................................................................................................................................... 5 Grade 1 .......................................................................................................................................... 11 Grade 2 .......................................................................................................................................... 18 Grade 3 .......................................................................................................................................... 25 Grade 4 .......................................................................................................................................... 32 Grade 5 .......................................................................................................................................... 39 Grade 6 .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pincelli M. Hull [email protected] (203) 823-7985
    Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics PO Box 208109 New Haven, CT 06520-8109 Pincelli M. Hull [email protected] (203) 823-7985 http://earth.geology.yale.edu/~ph269/ PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS Assistant Professor, Yale University, Department of Geology & Geophysics July 2013 EDUCATION Yale University, Department of Geology & Geophysics April 2010 – June 2013 ! Post Doctoral Associate [mentor: Derek E. G. Briggs] Universität Konstanz, Department of Biology Oct 2010 – Aug 2011 ! Visiting Postdoctoral Researcher [mentor: Axel Meyer] Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UCSD June 2004 – April 2010 ! PhD, Dissertation Title: Macroevolutionary patterns in planktonic foraminifera and the recovery of pelagic ecosystems from the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction ! Advisors: Richard D. Norris and Mark D. Ohman ! Committee: Peter J.S. Franks, Jeremy B.C. Jackson, Lawrence Saul, George Sugihara ! Curriculum: Biological Oceanography and Center for Marine Biodiversity and Conservation [IGERT Associate, Interdisciplinary Graduate Education Research and Training, NSF] Duke University Sept 1999 – June 2003 ! B.S. Biology, B.S. Earth and Ocean Sciences, German Minor Sea Education Association Spring 1999 ! College semester at sea: oceanography, nautical science, maritime history [C-163] RESEARCH INTERESTS Evolution of Oceans and Life [Paleontology, Paleoceanography, and Global Change] ! Ecological and evolutionary response of marine ecosystems to past global change ! Paleoceanographic and planktonic foraminiferal evolution in the early
    [Show full text]
  • 041-2011-Abstracts-BOE-III-Crete.Pdf
    Boreskov Institute of Catalysis of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia Borissiak Paleontological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia III International Conference “Biosphere Origin and Evolution” RETHYMNO, CRETE, GREECE OCTOBER 16-20, 2011 ABSTRACTS Novosibirsk, 2011 © Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, 2011 INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Alexei Rozanov, Borissiak Paleontological Institute RAS, Moscow, Russia Co‐Chairman Georgii Zavarzin, Institute of Microbiology RAS, Moscow, Russia Co‐Chairman Vadim Agol Moscow State University, Russia Yury Chernov Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Moscow, Russia Institute of Protein Research RAS, Pushchino, Moscow region, Alexander Chetverin Russia David Deamer Biomolecular Engineering, School of Engineering, Santa Cruz, USA V.S. Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy SB RAS, Nikolay Dobretsov Novosibirsk, Russia Mikhail Fedonkin Geological Institute RAS, Moscow, Russia Siegfried Franck Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany V.I. Vernadskii Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry Eric Galimov RAS, Moscow, Russia Mikhail Grachev Limnological Institute SB RAS, Irkutsk, Russia Richard Hoover Nasa Marshall Space Flight Ctr., Huntsville, USA North‐Western Scientific Center RAS, St. Petersburg State Sergey Inge‐Vechtomov University, Russia Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum‐Gas Geology and Geophysics Alexander Kanygin SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia Astrospace Centre of Lebedev Physical Institute RAS, Moscow, Nikolay Kardashev Russia Józef Kaźmierczak Institute of Paleobiology PAN, Warsaw, Poland Nikolay Kolchanov Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum‐Gas Geology and Geophysics Alexei Kontorovich SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library Eugene V.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology Curricula at Universities
    Biology curricula at universities European Communities Biologists Association ECBA publication No 1 Biology curricula at universities Report of a Workshop organized by the European Communities Biologists Association Index 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2. OBJECTIVES OF THE WORKSHOP......................................................................................................... 5 3. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................................................................. 6 4. THE BASIC TRAINING BIOLOGISTS PRIOR TO SPECIALIZATION .................................................. 8 4.1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 8 4.2. TOPICS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE CENTRAL CORE-PROGRAM................................................................... 8 4.3. SKILLS AND ATTITUDES....................................................................................................................... 10 5. THE PHASE OF SPECIALIZATION (INTO PROFESSION)................................................................... 12 5.1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................... 12 5.2. FURTHER TRAINING IN RESEARCH ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]