Five Forces Model Based Upon Michael E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Five Forces Model Based Upon Michael E Five Forces Model Based Upon Michael E. Porter’s Work Contents 1 Michael Porter 1 1.1 Early life .................................................. 1 1.2 Career ................................................... 1 1.2.1 Competition among nations .................................... 1 1.2.2 Healthcare ............................................ 2 1.2.3 Consulting ............................................. 2 1.2.4 Non-profit ............................................. 2 1.3 Honors and awards ............................................ 2 1.4 Criticisms ................................................. 2 1.5 Works ................................................... 2 1.6 See also .................................................. 3 1.7 References ................................................ 3 1.8 External links ............................................... 4 2 Porter five forces analysis 5 2.1 Five forces ................................................ 5 2.1.1 Threat of new entrants ...................................... 5 2.1.2 Threat of substitute products or services ............................. 6 2.1.3 Bargaining power of customers (buyers) ............................. 6 2.1.4 Bargaining power of suppliers .................................. 6 2.1.5 Intensity of competitive rivalry .................................. 7 2.2 Usage ................................................... 7 2.3 Criticisms ................................................. 7 2.4 See also .................................................. 7 2.5 References ................................................. 8 2.6 Further reading .............................................. 8 3 Porter’s generic strategies 9 3.1 Concept .................................................. 9 3.2 Origins ................................................... 10 i ii CONTENTS 3.3 Cost Leadership Strategy ......................................... 10 3.4 Differentiation Strategy .......................................... 11 3.4.1 Variants on the Differentiation Strategy .............................. 11 3.5 Focus strategies .............................................. 11 3.6 Recent developments ........................................... 12 3.7 Criticisms of generic strategies ...................................... 12 3.8 See also .................................................. 13 3.9 References ................................................. 13 4 Competitive advantage 14 4.1 Overview ................................................. 14 4.2 Generic competitive strategies ....................................... 14 4.2.1 Cost leadership strategy ...................................... 14 4.2.2 Differentiation strategy ...................................... 15 4.2.3 Innovation strategy ........................................ 15 4.2.4 Operational effectiveness strategy ................................. 15 4.3 See also .................................................. 15 4.4 References ................................................. 15 4.5 Further reading .............................................. 16 4.6 External links ............................................... 16 5 Value chain 17 5.1 Firm-level ................................................. 17 5.1.1 Primary activities ......................................... 18 5.1.2 Support activities ......................................... 18 5.1.3 Physical, virtual and combined value chain ............................ 18 5.2 Industry-level ............................................... 18 5.3 Global value chains (GVCs) ....................................... 19 5.3.1 Cross border / cross region value chains ............................. 19 5.3.2 Global value chains (GVCs) in development ........................... 19 5.4 Significance ................................................ 19 5.5 Use with other Analysis Tools ...................................... 20 5.6 SCOR ................................................... 20 5.7 Value Reference Model .......................................... 20 5.8 See also .................................................. 20 5.9 References ................................................. 21 5.10 Further reading .............................................. 21 5.11 External links ............................................... 21 5.12 Text and image sources, contributors, and licenses ............................ 22 CONTENTS iii 5.12.1 Text ................................................ 22 5.12.2 Images .............................................. 23 5.12.3 Content license .......................................... 23 Chapter 1 Michael Porter For the American wrestling ring announcer, see Michael inspired the Porter five forces analysis framework for ana- Porter (professional wrestling). For the Australian rules lyzing industries.[3] footballer, see Michael Porter (footballer). For the English footballer, see Mick Porter. Michael Eugene Porter (born May 23, 1947)[2] is the 1.2 Career Bishop William Lawrence University Professor at The Insti- tute for Strategy and Competitiveness, based at the Harvard Business School. He is a leading authority on competitive Michael Porter is the author of 18 books and numerous strategy and the competitiveness and economic develop- articles including Competitive Strategy, Competitive Advan- ment of nations, states, and regions. Michael Porter’s work tage, Competitive Advantage of Nations, and On Competi- is recognized in many governments, corporations and aca- tion. A six-time winner of the McKinsey Award for the demic circles globally. He chairs Harvard Business School’s best Harvard Business Review article of the year, Professor [4] program dedicated for newly appointed CEOs of very large Porter is the most cited author in business and economics. corporations. Porter stated in a 2010 interview: “What I've come to see as probably my greatest gift is the ability to take an extraordi- narily complex, integrated, multidimensional problem and 1.1 Early life get arms around it conceptually in a way that helps, that in- forms and empowers practitioners to actually do things.”[3] Michael Eugene Porter received a BSE with high honors in aerospace and mechanical engineering from Princeton Uni- versity in 1969, where he graduated first in his class and was elected to Phi Beta Kappa and Tau Beta Pi. He received an 1.2.1 Competition among nations MBA with high distinction in 1971 from Harvard Business School, where he was a George F. Baker Scholar, and a PhD Porter wrote “The Competitive Advantage of Nations” in in business economics from Harvard University in 1973. 1990. The book is based on studies of ten nations and ar- gues that a key to national wealth and advantage was the Porter said in an interview that he first became interested in productivity of firms and workers collectively, and that the competition through sports. He was on the NCAA cham- national and regional environment supports that productiv- pionship golf squad at Princeton and also played football, [3] ity. He proposed the “diamond” framework, a mutually- baseball and basketball growing up. reinforcing system of four factors that determine national Porter credits Harvard professor Roland “Chris” Chris- advantage: factor conditions; demand conditions; related tensen with inspiring him and encouraging him to speak up or supporting industries; and firm strategy, structure and ri- during class, hand-writing Porter a note that began: “Mr. valry. Information, incentives, and infrastructure were also Porter, you have a lot to contribute in class and I hope you key to that productivity.[5] will.” Porter reached the top of the class by the second year [3] During April 2014, Porter discussed how the United States at Harvard Business School. ranks relative to other countries on a comprehensive score- At Harvard, Porter took classes in industrial organization card called “The Social Progress Index”, an effort which he economics, which attempts to model the effect of compet- co-authored.[6] This scorecard rated the U.S. on a compre- itive forces on industries and their profitability. This study hensive set of metrics; overall, the U.S. placed 16th.[7] 1 2 CHAPTER 1. MICHAEL PORTER 1.2.2 Healthcare foundations in the area of creating social value. He also currently serves on the Board of Trustees of Princeton Uni- Porter has devoted considerable attention to understanding versity. and addressing the pressing problems in health care delivery in the United States and other countries. His book, Redefin- ing Health Care (written with Elizabeth Teisberg), devel- 1.3 Honors and awards ops a new strategic framework for transforming the value delivered by the health care system, with implications for In 2000, Michael Porter was appointed a Harvard Univer- providers, health plans, employers, and government, among sity Professor, the highest professional recognition that can other actors. The book received the James A. Hamilton be awarded to a Harvard faculty member.[10] In 2009, he award of the American College of Healthcare Executives was awarded an honorary degree from McGill University. in 2007 for book of the year. His New England Journal of Medicine research article, “A Strategy for Health Care Reform—Toward a Value-Based System” (July 2009), lays out a health reform strategy for the U.S. His work on health 1.4 Criticisms care is being extended to address the problems of health care delivery in developing countries, in collaboration with Porter has been criticized by some academics for incon- Dr. Jim Yong
Recommended publications
  • "Repeatability" by Chris Zook and James Allen
    REPEATABILITY Build Enduring Businesses for a World of Constant Change CHRIS ZOOK and JAMES ALLEN CHRIS ZOOK is a partner at Bain & Company and cohead of Bain’s Strategy practice. He specializes in helping companies find their next wave of profitable growth and has experience in the information, health-care, computer and venture capital industries. He is coauthor of Profit from the Core, Beyond the Core and Unstoppable as well as a number of articles in the business press. He is a graduate of Williams College, Oxford University and Harvard University. JAMES ALLEN is also a partner at Bain & Company’s London office and cohead of Bain’s Strategy practice. He has worked extensively in consumer products, oil and gas, technology and telecommunications and healthcare. He was coauthor of Profit from the Core and is a frequent keynote speaker. He is a graduate of Harvard Business School. The Web site for this book is at www.repeatability.com. ISBN 978-1-77544-730-6 SUMMARIES.COM is a concentrated business information service. Every week, subscribers are e-mailed a concise summary of a different business book. Each summary is about 8 pages long and contains the stripped-down essential ideas from the entire book in a time-saving format. By investing less than one hour per week in these summaries, subscribers gain a working knowledge of the top business titles. Subscriptions are available on a monthly or yearly basis. Further information is available at www.summaries.com. Repeatability - Page 1 MAIN IDEA Everyone wants to grow their revenues and yet when the results are analyzed, the companies which end up achieving growth don’t generally chase hot markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding a Position for a Firm to Succeed in the Seed Industry
    FINDING A POSITION FOR A FIRM TO SUCCEED IN THE SEED INDUSTRY by THOMAS R. CARLSON B.S., Saint Cloud State University, 1977 A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF AGRIBUSINESS Department of Agricultural Economics College of Agriculture KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2007 Approved by: Major Professor Dr. Arlo Biere ABSTRACT The investors I am representing would like to know if they can be successful in the seed industry. They have certain skills and abilities along with industry experience that provides them with certain advantages that would allow them to succeed in the industry. The thesis or study will provide them with a detailed study of the possibilities and the challenges that are before them. To gain insight into positioning a firm in the industry, one must find a tool to help us to discover the answers to the question. I will use “Strategic Visioning in Cascade ®“, this model outlines area of interest such as; a strategic overview, a value proposition, a market analysis, a functional analysis, financial projection and exit strategy in its total. The focus of the study will provide insight into the value proposition and market analysis. The value proposition will follow Michael Porter’s Competitive Strategy analogy of cost leadership, differentiation and focus strategies. The market analysis will follow Thompson and Strickland’s seven questions that lead to understanding of the selected industry. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • What Role for Strategic Management Expertise?
    PANEL II: TOPICS IN ANTITRUST TO WHICH PROFESSOR BRODLEY CONTRIBUTED ANTITRUST – WHAT ROLE FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT EXPERTISE? FELIX OBERHOLZER-GEE & DENNIS A. YAO∗ INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1457 I. WHAT IS STRATEGY? ........................................................................ 1458 II. HOW DOES STRATEGY DIFFER FROM ECONOMICS? .......................... 1461 III. ANTITRUST LAW AND ECONOMICS (AND STRATEGY) ....................... 1464 IV. THE (NON) INFLUENCE OF STRATEGY SCHOLARSHIP ON ANTITRUST LAW – A ROUGH CUT .................................................... 1469 V. WHY HAS STRATEGY HAD LITTLE INFLUENCE IN THE AREA OF ANTITRUST? ...................................................................................... 1475 INTRODUCTION The purpose of antitrust law is to promote competition and protect consumers from anticompetitive business practices. Enforcing antitrust rules thus requires an understanding of what constitutes an anticompetitive business practice; an understanding influenced by both legal precedent and broader knowledge of markets, companies, and competition. This Essay traces the influence of two academic fields – economics and strategic management – on antitrust law. Both fields are natural candidates to influence courts, government competition authorities, and legal scholars, but, as we will document, strategic management appears to have had little influence to date. We begin with a brief description of strategic management
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Porter: What Is Strategy?
    MICHAEL PORTER: WHAT IS STRATEGY? Thinker 028 » INTRODUCTION Porter has generally been viewed as being at the leading edge of strategic thinking since his first major publication, Competitive Strategy (1980), which was a great success and became a corporate bible for many in the early 1980s. A second major publication Competitive Advantage (1985) introduced the now familiar concepts of competitive advantage and the value chain. His five forces model has been widely taught and his ideas have been hugely influential for organisations and governments on a global scale. Although he has always had his critics, Porter’s reputation has taken a particularly serious dent in recent years with the bankruptcy of his strategy consulting firm Monitor and its subsequent acquisition by Deloitte; as well as robust challenges being made to some of his key ideas. » LIFE AND CAREER Born in 1947, Porter completed a degree in aeronautical engineering at Princeton in 1969 and took an economics doctorate at Harvard, joining the faculty there as a tenured professor at the age of 26. He has acted as consultant to companies and to governments and, like many academics, set up a consulting company, Monitor, in 1983. Porter is currently the Bishop William Lawrence University Professor at The Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness, Harvard Business School. » KEY THEORIES Porter's Thinking Porter’s thinking on strategy has been supported by precision research into industries and companies, and has remained consistent as well as developmental. He has concentrated on different aspects at different times, spinning the threads together with a logic that seemed irrefutable.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Competitive Advantage of the United States of America in Commercial Human Orbital Spaceflight Markets
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Management Papers Wharton Faculty Research 2014 An Analysis of the Competitive Advantage of the United States of America in Commercial Human Orbital Spaceflight Markets Greg Autry Laura Hhuang Jeff Foust Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/mgmt_papers Part of the Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods Commons Recommended Citation Autry, G., Hhuang, L., & Foust, J. (2014). An Analysis of the Competitive Advantage of the United States of America in Commercial Human Orbital Spaceflight Markets. Futron Corporation, Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/mgmt_papers/222 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/mgmt_papers/222 For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Analysis of the Competitive Advantage of the United States of America in Commercial Human Orbital Spaceflight Markets Abstract The “Public/Private Human Access to Space” / Human Orbital Markets (HOM) study group of the International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) has established a framework for the identification and analysis of relevant factors and structures that support a global human orbital spaceflight market. The HOM study group has called for analysis at the national level to be incorporated in their global study. This report, commissioned by the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transport, provides a review of demonstrated and potential Human Orbital Markets and an analysis of the U.S. industrial supply chain supporting commercial human orbital spaceflight. eW utilize a multi‐method, holistic approach incorporating primarily qualitative methodologies that also incorporates relevant statistical data. Our methodology parallels the National Competitive Advantage diamond model pioneered by economist Michael Porter. The study reveals that while the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look Into the World of Monitor Deloitte Future Confident
    A look into the world of Monitor Deloitte Future confident About Deloitte 4 About Monitor Deloitte 7 You are the strategy talent we need 17 Our recruitment process 21 03 About Deloitte Being part of a global network, Deloitte professionals have the opportunity to work on challenging projects across the globe. = Global = Belgium Revenue Headcount New Hires $47.6B €607M 334,800 4,577 88,820 1,131 (+5.5%) (+7.4%) (+7.3%) (+4.0%) (27% of total Headcount) Countries and territories 150+ FY20 figures Deloitte professionals who Social impact contributions attended Deloitte University “US $265M (in donations and 114,000 volunteering or pro bono hours)” 04 Analyst Recognitions Deloitte ranked No. 1 consulting service provider worldwide by revenue according to Gartner Deloitte named the undisputed global leader in Business Transformation consulting based on strategy and current offering by Forrester Deloitte is ranked in the top five of Universum’s “World’s Most Attractive Employer" Deloitte has again been recognized as one of the Top Companies for Executive Women by the National Association for Female Executives (NAFE). 05 At Deloitte, we empower our people to make an impact that matters... for our clients, teams and their own development 06 About Monitor Deloitte The global strategy practice of Deloitte Monitor Deloitte aspiration To be the leading Global Strategy Practice ... by serving as trusted advisors cross industry… … by owning the CxO agenda at the most influential private and public companies... … by advising our clients on navigating
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Business and Human Rights Workshop
    Teaching Business and Human Rights Workshop Discussion Summary May 30-31st, 2013 Columbia Law School | Columbia University New York Contents OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................... 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................. 3 OPENING SESSION ..................................................................................................................... 4 FILM SCREENING AND DISCUSSION WITH THE DIRECTOR: “CORPORATE-COMMUNITY CONFLICTS, AN INTRODUCTION” ........................................................................................................................... 4 “TEACHING HUMAN RIGHTS IN A BUSINESS SCHOOL: A VIEW FROM THE INSIDE” ............................. 5 Discussion ............................................................................................................................ 6 I. CRAFTING A BUSINESS AND HUMAN RIGHTS COURSE .................................................. 8 PENNY COLLENETTE, “A NEW INTERNATIONAL REALITY – THE BUSINESS OF HUMAN RIGHTS,” UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA SCHOOL OF LAW (CANADA) .................................................................... 8 SHANE DARCY, “BUSINESS AND HUMAN RIGHTS,” NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND IN GALWAY .. 9 ANTONY CROCKETT, “LEGAL PRACTICE COURSE” (ADVOCATES FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT), CLIFFORD CHANCE (UK) .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Crux of Corporate Strategy Building an Advantaged Portfolio by MICHAEL ARMSTRONG, JONATHAN GOODMAN and GAVIN MCTAVISH
    The Crux of Corporate Strategy Building an Advantaged Portfolio BY MICHAEL ARMSTRONG, JONATHAN GOODMAN AND GAVIN MCTAVISH One of the central objectives of corporate strategy is Monitor Deloitte has found3 that the most successful for executive management to think holistically about portfolios exhibit three broad characteristics: They are a company’s portfolio of businesses—conceiving and strategically sound, value-creating and resilient. Perhaps spearheading ways to make the aggregate value of this seems obvious. But in our experience—maybe because a company’s holdings durable over time, and greater it requires consideration and testing across a wide range than the sum of its parts. This vital mission comprises of attributes—companies seldom apply this tripartite two central questions: In which businesses should we “Advantaged Portfolio” approach. participate? And, how do we create value within and across1 our businesses? In other words, where will we play and how will we win,2 at the portfolio level? In this white paper, we explore the characteristics of Executives, academics and consultants have devised an Advantaged Portfolio and the trio of attributes that numerous frameworks for building and sustaining the constitute each (figure 1). These attributes in aggregate optimal corporate portfolio. Our experience suggests that are needed to fully assess, assemble and maintain a any successful portfolio design framework (as distinct from top-performing corporate portfolio. A company may need the portfolio itself) has to have three important features. To to include additional company-specific criteria to meet its begin with, the portfolio framework must be specific goals and aspirations,4 and the specific weighting multi-dimensional in its criteria, because portfolio of attributes will vary by company.
    [Show full text]
  • The Porter Patterns Allan Kelly - 1 Abstract This Paper Describes Five Widely-Applicable Business Strategy Patterns
    Business Strategy Design Patterns 15-May-05 Business Strategy Design Patterns The Porter Patterns Allan Kelly - http://www.allankelly.net 1 Abstract This paper describes five widely-applicable business strategy patterns. The initiate patterns where inspired Michael Porter’s work on competitive strategy (1980). By applying the pattern form we are able to explore the strategies and consequences in a fresh light. The patterns form part of a larger endeavour to apply pattern thinking to the business domain. This endeavour seeks to map the business domain in patterns, this involves develop patterns, possibly based on existing literature, and mapping existing patterns into a coherent model of the business domain. If you find the paper interesting you might be interested in some more patterns that are currently (May 2005) in development. These describe in more detail how these strategies can be implemented: http://www.allankelly.net/patterns/FewMoreBusPatterns.pdf This paper is one of the most downloaded pieces on my website. I’d be interested to know more about who is downloading the paper, what use your making of it and any comments you have on it - [email protected]. 2 Pattern Thumbnails Cost Leadership Build an organization that can produce your chosen product more cheaply than anyone else. You can then choose to undercut the opposition (and sell more) or sell at the same price (and make more profit per unit.) Differentiated Build a product that fulfils the same functions as your Product competitors but is clearly different, e.g. it is better quality, novel design, or carries a brand name.
    [Show full text]
  • Havard Business Review 2007 April
    TOP-TEAM POLITICS WHEN YOUR CORE BUSINESS IS DYING M …page 90 …page 66 A WARDSCKINSEY PAGE 53 www.hbr.org April 2007 58 What Your Leader Expects of You Larry Bossidy 66 Finding Your Next Core Business Chris Zook 78 Promise-Based Management: The Essence of Execution Donald N. Sull and Charles Spinosa 90 The Leadership Team: Complementary Strengths or Conflicting Agendas? Stephen A. Miles and Michael D. Watkins 100 Avoiding Integrity Land Mines Ben W. Heineman, Jr. 20 FORETHOUGHT 33 HBR CASE STUDY Why Didn't We Know? Ralph Hasson 45 FIRST PERSON Preparing for the Perfect Product Launch James P. Hackett 111 TOOL KIT THOUSHALT The Process Audit Michael Hammer …page 58 124 BEST PRACTICE Human Due Diligence David Harding and Ted Rouse 138 EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES 144 PANEL DISCUSSION Ralph Lauren presents Purple Label Made to Measure The Ultimate Sartorial Tradition A legacy of rarefied elegance continues. In the spirit of Savile Row tailoring, Purple Label offers impeccably crafted suits, dress shirts, trousers, topcoats, sport coats and formalwear. Ralph Lauren has personally selected the world’s most luxurious fabrics —offered exclusively and in limited edition —and appointed some of the very few remaining artisans trained in the timeless art of hand craftsmanship. Experience an unparalleled dedication to excellence and service at the highest level. To schedule a private appointment please call or visit a Ralph Lauren store. NEW YORK BEVERLY HILLS CHICAGO BUENOS AIRES DUBAI TOKYO HONG KONG LONDON PARIS MILAN MOSCOW There are 193 countries in the world. None of them are energy independent. So who’s holding whom over a barrel? The fact is, the vast majority of countries rely on the few energy-producing nations that won the geological lottery, blessing them with abundant hydrocarbons.
    [Show full text]
  • AN EXAMINATION of a MUSIC SCENE AS ECONOMIC CLUSTER Michael Seman, University of North Texas
    Artivate: A Journal of Entrepreneurship in the Arts Volume 4, Issue 2 http://artivate.org pp. 33-49 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ WHAT IF HEWLETT AND PACKARD HAD STARTED A BAND INSTEAD? AN EXAMINATION OF A MUSIC SCENE AS ECONOMIC CLUSTER Michael Seman, University of North Texas Abstract A growing area of discourse in urban economics is the value of artistic production and its role in economic development theory. One arts subsector that has received little attention is popular music. Prior research tangentially acknowledges that music scenes function as economic clusters, but little detailing of their dynamics as such exists. The bulk of attention is paid to how these scenes operate in the framework of the broader music industry, not how they contribute to their surrounding urban economic landscapes. This paper uses Michael Porter’s economic cluster theory to examine Denton, Texas’ music scene. Findings point to the scene operating as an economic cluster as defined by Porter in addition to catalyzing economic and community development. Results address the existing gap in research leaving the economic value of music scenes underexplored and help detail the necessary conditions for a music scene to develop. Keywords Urban, Economic, Cluster, Music, Scene, Entrepreneurship Introduction A growing area of discourse in urban economics is the value of artistic production and its role in current economic development theory (Currid, 2009). One arts subsector that has received little attention in this discourse is popular music. Of specific interest are music scenes – the spatially-based cultural agglomerations of human and physical capital that include musicians, consumers, entrepreneurs, technicians, venues, and studios all working together (often in a volunteer, “Do-It-Yourself” or “DIY” nature) to facilitate the creation and performance of music (Bennett & Peterson, 2004; Connell & Gibson, 2003; Florida & Jackson, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Michael Porter
    Copyright Copyright © 2012 Joan Magretta All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), without the prior permission of the publisher. Requests for permission should be directed to [email protected], or mailed to Permissions, Harvard Business School Publishing, 60 Harvard Way, Boston, Massachusetts 02163. ISBN: 978-1-4221-6059-6 By his example, Arthur Rosin, my uncle, taught me the pleasures of understanding and explaining. This book is dedicated to him, to Betty Rosin, and to my parents, Cyrille and Eugene Gorin. Contents Copyright Acknowledgments Introduction Part One: What Is Competition? 1. Competition: The Right Mind-Set 2. The Five Forces: Competing for Profits 3. Competitive Advantage: The Value Chain and Your P&L Part Two: What Is Strategy? 4. Creating Value: The Core 5. Trade-offs: The Linchpin 6. Fit: The Amplifier 7. Continuity: The Enabler Epilogue: A Short List of Implications FAQs: An Interview with Michael Porter A Porter Glossary: Key Concepts Chapter Notes and Sources About the Author Acknowledgments The Michael Porter I know is first and foremost a gifted teacher. If this book succeeds in helping readers understand Porter’s ideas in their full richness, it is thanks in large measure to his encouragement, his guidance, and his patience in explaining those ideas to me. As this book progressed, he carefully reviewed every chapter, giving generously both his time and his laser-sharp attention. The company examples I have used to illustrate Porter’s ideas draw not only on his work, but also on that of many researchers and business writers.
    [Show full text]