DOCSLIB.ORG

“Druzhba” Pipeline) • Restrictions in Turkish and Dutch Straits Limit Growth of Exports Source: Petroleum Agrus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“Druzhba” Pipeline) • Restrictions in Turkish and Dutch Straits Limit Growth of Exports Source: Petroleum Agrus Russian Oil and Gas: Business Opportunities The LUKOIL Vision September 2003 Russia’s Crude Oil Reserves Still Underestimated Russia’s Proved Reserves Russia’s Share in Global 145 Proved Oil Reserves 125 Russia 6% Saudi 105 Arabia bbl 25% n 85 150 bl 2002 65 Others 76 69% 45 60 48 67%Russia 25 18% 2001(A) 2002(A) 2002(B) 2010-2015E 2002(A) – Western estimates of Russia’s total proved oil reserves (Sources: BP Statistics) 2002(B) – Internationally audited oil reserves of Russia’s ten leading oil 2010-15E and gas companies (Sources: Miller&Lents, DeGolyer and Others Saudi MacNaughton, Company data) 59% Arabia 2010-15E – Expected increase in proved oil reserves due to development of 23% new regions, including Timan-Pechora, Caspian Sea region, Eastern Siberia, Arctic shelf and Sakhalin 1 Just Getting Back the Historical Volumes Russia Russia Russia Russia 8% 11% 19% 15% Rest of Rest of the Rest of 1987 Rest of 1998 2002 the 2012 world the the world 81% world 85% world 89% 92% Crude oil production in Russia 600 12 500 10 400 8 300 6 200 mln bpd mln tonnes pa 4 100 2 0 0 * 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 1985 2012E * On 8 month basis, annualized. 2003E 2 Russia — a Future Oil Supplier to the U.S. US crude oil suppliers Canada Arab 15% OPEC USA 28% Mexico 15% 2002 North Sea 6% Others Other 13% OPEC 23% Canada 14% Arab OPEC 23% Mexico As export infrastructure in Russia 14% 2010E expands, Russian oil companies North Sea will be able to supply at least 2% Other OPEC 13% of total oil imports to the Others 20% United States 13% Russia 14% Source: US Energy Department, IEA, WOOD MACKENZIE, LUKOIL. 3 Pipelines Capacities Grow Slower Than Production 450 Deficit of export capacities 400 Alternative export options Дефицит 350 Murmansk Pipeline System Angarsk — China 300 Odessa — Brody pipeline s ICIT 250 DEF reverse nne o t Adria pipeline reverse n l 200 m CPC-Transneft connector 150 Venspils terminal 100 Varandei terminal 50 BPS (2nd and 3rd stages) 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Current capacities 4 Alternative Export Options Export alternatives to Transneft pipeline system are railroads, river transport and commercial pipelines Export transportation costs for The companies have to boost their railroads and river transport are exports via railroads and river tankers significantly higher comparing to that increase ecological risks pipelines: • Transneft — $10-12/tonne • Murmansk pipeline — $20-24/tonne • River transport — $35-40/tonne • Railroad — 45-60$/tonne Fire on river tanker in Samara (September, 2003) 5 Russia — A New Source of Crude For the U.S. Gulf of Mexico Crude Production 1.0 ¾ Russia’s oil industry is expected to grow at a 4-6% average annual rate over the 0.8 next decade d 0.6 n b/ l m 0.4 ¾ Russian crude oil production is projected to increase to 11 mbpd by 2010, a 45% 0.2 increase from 2002 0.0 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006E 2010E North Sea Crude Production ¾ Terminals capable of handling 8 supertankers will open the US market to Russian crude oil 6 d / b 4 n As a new source of crude, Russia can ml ¾ 2 help ensure US energy stability, replacing a portion of declining North Sea and Gulf 0 of Mexico oil production 1998 2000 2002 2004E 2006E 2008E 2010E Norway United Kingdom Denmark Other Source: WOOD MACKENZIE. 6 Russian Oil Exports — Unsecured Storms in the Black Sea in Russian Domestic Crude Price Dynamics December 2002 forced the 18 terminal in Novorossiysk to stop 16 14 the operations almost for a month Historical 12 minimum l 10 bb Gulf of Finland (the Baltic $/ 8 6 Sea) has been frozen in 4 December, 2002 — January, 2003 2 resulting in 20% of working time 0 3 3 2 3 02 03 03 0 0 0 0 loss 02 - - - - - - l l r p- p- n Ju Ju Ja Se Se Nov Ma May Total exports — 197 mln The problems with sea terminals tonnes (2002) in December, 2002 — January, 2003 caused the dramatic fall of domestic crude oil price Russian oil exports are unsecured: • Strong dependence from consumers in Eastern Europe (“Druzhba” pipeline) • Restrictions in Turkish and Dutch straits limit growth of exports Source: Petroleum Agrus. • Russian sea terminals strongly depend on weather conditions 7 Caspian Oil Will Intensify Competition at the Traditional Markets for Russian Oil Companies 8 «Buyer's Market» in Eastern Europe Will Strengthen (“Druzhba” Pipeline) Urals/Brent Discount Dynamics (Russian average): •Historical Discount (20 years) — $0.7-0.8/bbl • 2001-2003 — $1.3-1.5/bbl Urals/Brent Discount ("Druzhba" pipeline) 40 Dated Brent (NWE) $3.6/bbl ) 35 Urals ("Druzhba") bbl / 30 $ ( $2.2/bbl e c i 25 pr e 20 d u r C 15 10 2 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 0 0 - - - - - - - l l v r- r- y y p- n n Ju Ju Ja Ja Se No Ma Ma Ma Ma 9 Low Diversification Causes Losses Monopoly of “Druzhba” pipeline crude oil consumers and limitation of other export directions causes export revenues losses of up to $2.3 bln pa (comparing to export through Novorossiysk) 24 0.50 1.85 2.45 4.81 7.48 22 20 l* b 18 22.55 22.05 $/b 16 20.70 20.10 17.74 14 15.07 12 FOB Novorossiysk Litva (FIT "Druzhba" - "Druzhba" - Ukraine (DAF Belorussia (FIT Mazeikiu) south direction north direction Krasny Yar) Mozyr) * Real prices in the middle of 2002. Sources: Petroleum Argus, Ministry of Energy of Russia. 10 The Murmansk Project Gives an Opportunity to Export Oil to the USA Exports of Russian oil to the USA has not been profitable so far • Unavailability of deep-water export terminals has not allowed for 270 thousand tons (2 million barrels) and bigger shipments. In this case savings on freight makes it possible to reach efficiency comparable with traditional supplies to the European market. The Murmansk project provides for an opportunity to profitably export oil to the USA and has advantages over other routes • Murmansk is the only ice-free Russian port with a closed deep-water harbor allowing a year-round shipments of oil in tankers having 300 thousand tons (2.2 million barrels) deadweight and bigger • The project’s costs match any other projects with regard to the total transportation costs to the customer • The project is expected to cover all of forecasted export capacity deficit in Russia 11 Comparison of the Different Routes to Carry Oil to the U.S. 12 Murmansk Pipeline Will Improve Russia’ Export Exposure Route Western Siberia — Usa region — Murmansk Pipeline capacity — 70 mln tones pa Pipeline length — 2,717 km Pipeline diameter— 1,220 mm Capital expenditures — $5,165 mln Tariff at pay-off period— $20.0 per tonne Route Western Siberia — Ukhta — Murmansk Pipeline capacity — 70 mln tones pa Pipeline length — 3,241 km* Pipeline diameter — 1,220 mm Capital expenditures — $5,744* mln Tariff at pay-off period— $24.4 per tonne * Taking into account distance and capital expenditures for Usa — Ukhta pipeline construction. 13 Murmansk Pipeline System Implementation Plan PROJECT PARTICIPANTS PROJECT SCHEDULE Commissioning Construction Capital costs and construction feasibility study, executive documents Elaboration of the pre-project documentation 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 14 LUKOIL Today Today LUKOIL is: 1.3% of global oil reserves and 2% of global oil production. 20% of total Russian oil production and 18% of total Russian oil refining. The only private Russian oil company whose share capital is dominated by minority stakeholders The 2nd largest private oil company worldwide by proven reserves. The 6th largest private oil company worldwide by production. The leading Russian oil business group with annual turnover of over $15 bln. The most liquid among Central and Eastern European stocks on the London Stock Exchange (LSE). The most liquid oil stock and second most liquid stock overall on the Russian Trading System (RTS). A leader among Russian oil companies for openness and transparency. The first Russian company to be listed on the London Stock Exchange. Sources: Energy Intelligence Group, Petroleum Intelligence Weekly, International Energy Agency, OPEC, US Energy Department, Russian Ministry of Energy, RTS, LSE, LUKOIL. 15 Part of the World Premier League 2002 Reserves 2002 Production ExxonMobil 21.0 Shell 4.3 ЛУКОЙЛ** 19.7* ExxonMobil 4.2 Shell 19.0 BP 3.5 BP 17.3 ChevronTexaco 2.6 ЮКОС 15.0 TotalFinaElf 2.4 ChevronTexaco 11.9 LUKOIL 1.6 TotalFinaElf 11.2 Yukos 1.4 ConocoPhillips 7.7 ENI 1.4 ENI 6.9 ConocoPhillips 1.0 RepsolYPF 5.1 RepsolYPF 0.4 0 5 10 15 20 25 012345 Reserves (bln boe) Production (mln boe/day) * Taking into account acquisitions in early 2003. Crude oil and natural gas liquids Natural gas Source: company’s annual reports 16 LUKOIL’s Global Operations Baltic States Byelorussia Poland Ukraine Cyprus Czech Republic Azerbaijan USA Bulgaria Romania Kazakhstan Turkey Uzbekistan Colombia Georgia Iran Egypt Iraq 17 International Upstream Activities International Strategy: • proximity to consumer markets • low-cost production • favorable taxation Region Status CIS (Caspian region) Middle East Latin America Under development, new Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan Egypt, Iran, Iraq Colombia opportunities Algeria, Libya, Kuwait, Ecuador, Brazil, New opportunities Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan UAE, Oman Venezuela 18 International Upstream Activities Strategy: increasing share of natural gas LUKOIL international activities will help to meet a key target of the Company’s development strategy, which is to increase the share of gas revenues to 30- 40% in the medium term.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • China's Dependence Upon Oil Supply: Part 1
    PART 1 1 CHINA’S DEPENDENCE UPON OIL SUPPLY PART 1 of 3 SERIALIZED STUDY BY – CAPT David L.O. Hayward Australian Army Reserve (Retd.) First published as an RUSI Defence Research Paper & republished as a SAGE International Special Study with the kind permission of CAPT David L.O. Hayward 2012 PART 1 2 “War which has undergone the changes of modern technology and the market system will be launched even more in atypical forms. In other words, while we are seeing a relative reduction in military violence, at the same time we definitely are seeing an increase in political, economic, and technological violence. However, regardless of the form the violence takes, war is war, and a change in the external appearance does not keep any war from abiding by the principles of war.” The above quote is from the book Unrestricted Warfare jointly written by two People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Colonels, namely Qaio Liang and Wang Xiangsui. The book was published in Beijing in early 1999. In the twelve years since it was unveiled to the West, the work has largely been dismissed as unlikely wishful thinking on the part of the authors. The book is not representative of PLA military philosophy or official policy. As recently as 2008, discussions held at the Pentagon in strategic-level war games were dismissive of Chinese capability and intent in the cyber realm. Source: US Navy Institute Blog, Annapolis, Maryland: March 2010 2012 PART 1 3 UNCLASSIFIED CHINA’S DEPENDENCE UPON OIL SUPPLY” By CAPT David L.O. Hayward (Rtd), former IT consultant in the oil industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Kerjasama Rusia - Arab Saudi Di Bidang Energi Minyak
    eJournal Ilmu Hubungan Internasional, 2017, 5 (3) 965-978 ISSN 2477-2623 (online), ISSN 2477-2615 (print), ejournal.hi.fisip-unmul.ac.id © Copyright 2016 KERJASAMA RUSIA - ARAB SAUDI DI BIDANG ENERGI MINYAK Achmad Salim1 Nim. 1002045113 Abstract The Freezing Oil program is an effort between Russia and Saudi Arabia to stabilize oil prices in the global market through a process of production restrictions in order to stabilize oil prices in the market. This research aims to explain the cooperation of Russia and Saudi Arabia in the field of energy oil based on the Joint Statement on Oil Market Cooperation 2016. The results of the research show that the implementation of the Freezing Oil program through a production restriction process undertaken by Russia and Saudi Arabia is both countries agreed to both limit production, it proved successful can increase the price of oil in the global market with the results of stable oil prices In the range of US $ 50 barrels. Type of research used is descriptive, The data presented is secondary data. The theory used is International Cooperation. Keywords : energy cooperation, Joint Statement on Oil Market Cooperation 2016, Russia, Saudi Arabia. Pendahuluan Rusia merupakan salah satu negara yang memiliki sumber daya alam berupa minyak dan gas bumi yang cukup besar. Menurut data Rosneft, pada September 2014, cadangan minyak Rusia mencapai 130m3 juta ton dan gas mencapai 396m3 juta (https://www.rosneft.com). Selain itu, pada tahun 2015, produk hasil olahan minyak dan gas Rusia menyumbang 63% dari total komoditas yang diekspornya. Bahkan di tahun yang sama, Rusia menempati peringkat ke-2 negara penghasil minyak dunia dengan persentasi sekitar 11% produksi minyak dunia dengan devisa sekitar US $86.2 juta dibawah Arab Saudi dengan 16% produksi minyak mentah dunia (http://www.worldstopexports.com) Hal ini membuktikan bahwa Rusia sangat bergantung pada komoditas minyak dan gas sebagai penghasil devisa negaranya.
    [Show full text]
  • The Energy Dimension in Russian Global Strategy
    THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY OF RICE UNIVERSITY THE ENERGY DIMENSION IN RUSSIAN GLOBAL STRATEGY RUSSIA AND REGIONAL ENERGY LINKS IN NORTHEAST ASIA DR. VLADIMIR I. IVANOV SENIOR ECONOMIST AND DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH, ECONOMIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR NORTHEAST ASIA (ERINA), NIIGATA, JAPAN PREPARED IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN ENERGY STUDY SPONSORED BY THE PETROLEUM ENERGY CENTER OF JAPAN AND THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RICE UNIVERSITY - OCTOBER 2004 THESE PAPERS WERE WRITTEN BY A RESEARCHER (OR RESEARCHERS) WHO PARTICIPATED IN A BAKER INSTITUTE RESEARCH PROJECT. WHEREVER FEASIBLE, THESE PAPERS ARE REVIEWED BY OUTSIDE EXPERTS BEFORE THEY ARE RELEASED. HOWEVER, THE RESEARCH AND VIEWS EXPRESSED IN THESE PAPERS ARE THOSE OF THE INDIVIDUAL RESEARCHER(S), AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY. © 2004 BY THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY OF RICE UNIVERSITY THIS MATERIAL MAY BE QUOTED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION, PROVIDED APPROPRIATE CREDIT IS GIVEN TO THE AUTHOR AND THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY. THIS STUDY WAS MADE POSSIBLE THROUGH THE GENEROUS SUPPORT OF THE PETROLEUM ENERGY CENTER OF JAPAN RENAISSANCE CAPITAL BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. LEHMAN BROTHERS BAKER INSTITUTE ENERGY FORUM ANADARKO PETROLEUM THE HONORABLE HUSHANG ANSARY AND MRS. ANSARY APACHE CORPORATION ARAMCO SERVICES BAKER BOTTS LLP BAKER HUGHES BP CHEVRONTEXACO CONOCOPHILLIPS EXXONMOBIL HALLIBURTON KUWAIT PETROLEUM MARATHON OIL CORPORATION MISSION RESOURCES NOBLE CORPORATION PETROLEUM ENERGY CENTER OF JAPAN QATAR PETROLEUM SCHLUMBERGER SHELL SHELL EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION CO. SIMMONS & COMPANY INTERNATIONAL TOTAL E&P USA, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazprom SE Print.Indd
    Factbook “Gazprom in Figures 2010–2014” The Power of Growth Factbook “Gazprom in Figures 2010–2014” Preface Gazprom in Figures 2010–2014 Factbook contains information and statistics prepared for the annual General Shareholders Meeting of OAO Gazprom in 2015. The Factbook is based on OAO Gazprom's corporate reports and information derived from Russian and foreign information publications. The term “OAO Gazprom” as used in this Factbook refers to the parent company of Gazprom Group, i.e. to Open Joint Stock Company Gazprom. The terms “Gazprom Group”, “the Group” or “Gazprom” imply OAO Gazprom and its subsidiaries taken as a whole. Similarly, the terms “Gazprom neft Group” and “Gazprom neft” refer to OAO Gazprom neft and its subsidiaries, “Gazprom energoholding” refers to OOO Gazprom energoholding and its subsidiaries, “Gazprom neftekhim Salavat” refers to OAO Gazprom neftekhim Salavat and its subsidiaries. In this Factbook, “companies investments into which are classifi ed as joint operations” defi ne OAO Tomskneft VNC and Salym Petroleum Development N.V. Gazprom's overall results as stated in the Factbook are recorded in compliance with the principles for preparing Gazprom Group's consolidated fi nancial (accounting) statements in accordance with the requirements of the Russian legislation (hereafter, the “RAS consolidated fi nancial (accounting) statements”) / Gazprom Group's consolidated fi nancial statements prepared under IFRS (hereafter, the “IFRS consolidated fi nancial statements”) and/or for the whole of Gazprom Group companies included for the purposes of Gazprom Group's RAS consolidated fi nancial (accounting) statements / IFRS consolidated fi nancial statements. Some fi gures of OAO Gazprom and its subsidiaries were derived from management accounts.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Energy Markets, the World Energy Markets and Russian Place in the World Energy Trade
    Russia and the World Energy Markets: Long-term Scenarios Sergey Paltseva, John Reillya, and Natalia Tourdyevab aMassachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, USA bCenter for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR), Moscow, Russia Abstract: The paper focuses on energy markets in Russia. First, we look at the recent developments in the world energy markets and in Russian natural gas, oil, and electricity sectors. Then we consider different scenarios for a potential development of energy markets, both in Russia and in Russian trading partners. Using the MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model, which is a general equilibrium model of the world economy, we consider different energy scenarios for the next 20-40 years. Our projections show energy use in Russia growing from 775 mtoe in 2005 to 1200 mtoe in 2050 in primary energy equivalence, while electricity use nearly doubles from about 1000 TWh in 2005 to 1900 TWh in 2050 in our reference projections. The energy system continues to rely heavily on traditional fossil energy. Our long-run reference projection for oil price is a continuous increase from $55/barrel in 2010 to $155/barrel in 2050 and for natural gas from $220/tcm in 2010 to $380/tcm in 2050. The model is not able to capture the volatility in energy prices that is commonly observed. The price projections should be seen as a long run trend around which there will likely continue to be volatility driven by short term events. Achieving the G8 goal of 50% greenhouse gas emissions reduction significantly changes our projections, reducing Russia’s fossil fuel production and domestic fuel and electricity use from the projected levels without such a policy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Oil Production in Russia: Life Under Sanctions
    The Future Of Oil Production In Russia: Life Under Sanctions THE AUTHORS Tatiana Mitrova Director, SKOLKOVO Energy Centre, Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO Ekaterina Grushevenko Senior analyst in the oil and gas sector, SKOLKOVO Energy Centre, Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO Artyom Malov Senior analyst in the oil and gas sector, SKOLKOVO Energy Centre, Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO The authors are grateful to the following experts for their valuable assistance in the collection and analysis of data, for verifying the logic of the study, editing and consulting support: x Sergey Vakulenko (Head of Strategy and Innovation Department at Gazprom Neft) x Valery Nesterov (Analytic at Sberbank SIB) x Dmitriy Grushevenko (Research associate at ERI RAS) 2 March 2018 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: “COMPOUND INTEREST RATE” EFFECT .........................................4 SANCTIONS AGAINST RUSSIA AFFECTING THE OIL INDUSTRY ...............................................6 US sectoral sanctions imposed in 2014 .......................................................................................6 EU sectoral sanctions imposed in 2014 ....................................................................................... 7 US sanctions imposed in 2017 .....................................................................................................9 Source: Energy Centre SKOLKOVO Business School............................................................... 11 THE REACTION OF THE RUSSIAN OIL INDUSTRY TO THE SANCTIONS ............................
    [Show full text]
  • The US Tight Oil Revolution and Its Impact on the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: Beyond the Supply Shock
    October 2014 The US Tight Oil Revolution and Its Impact on the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: Beyond the Supply Shock OIES PAPER: WPM 54 Bassam Fattouh The contents of this paper are the authors’ sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members. Copyright © 2014 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN 978-1-78467-012-2 October 2014 – The US Tight Oil Revolution and Its Impact on the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries i Acknowledgements The author would like to thank Ali Aissaoui, Majid Al-Moneef, Giacomo Luciani and Christopher Allsopp for their useful comments on earlier drafts of this paper. Grateful thanks are also due to the Kuwait Fund for the Advancement of Sciences, which facilitated this research. October 2014 - The US Tight Oil Revolution and Its Impact on the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries ii Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1 2. The US tight oil revolution: the supply shock ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Analysis of Russian Oil and Gas Reserves
    International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy Vol. 2, No. 2, 2012, pp.82-91 ISSN: 2146-4553 www.econjournals.com The Analysis of Russian Oil and Gas Reserves Yulia Grama Department of Diplomacy, National Chenchi University, Taiwan. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: This paper devotes to the analysis of Russian oil and gas reserves. Currently, Russia holds world’s leading positions in oil and gas supply, but there is uncertainty for how long the country would be able to maintain it. After analyzing the situation in this industry, studying oil and gas fields and governmental policy towards hydro carbonates production and supply in Russia, the author will provide her projection about the future development of Russian oil and gas supplies to the global market. Keywords: Russia; Oil and gas reserves; Energy supply; Energy policy JEL Classifications: Q31; Q47; Q48 1. Introduction Energy is one of the most important factors for the survival of humanity. It provides heat, light and mobility, the fuel of the economy. This is why the possession of energy is a dominant issue in the politics of every country (Wirth et al., 2003). Matthews (2008) made a good description of the importance of energy in the world: “Energy is the lifeblood of economies around the world. Global economic growth depends on adequate, reliable and affordable supplies of energy. Key foreign policy objectives, including support for democracy, trade, sustainable economic development, poverty reduction and environmental protection rely on the provision of safe, reliable and affordable energy supplies”. There is no other substitute to oil and gas for energy production both now and in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazprom Group's Sustainability Report
    GAZPROM GROUP’S SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2017 KEEPING THE BALANCE GAZPROM GROUP’S SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2017 KEEPING THE BALANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS Message from Gazprom CEO ________________________________________________________________________________ 4 About the Report ___________________________________________________________________________________________ 8 Definition of Material Issues to Be Covered in the Report ____________________________________________________ 9 Stakeholder Engagement _______________________________________________________________________________ 14 About Gazprom Group _____________________________________________________________________________________ 17 Business Model _______________________________________________________________________________________ 18 Gazprom Group’s Strategy ______________________________________________________________________________ 27 Sustainability Management _____________________________________________________________________________ 29 Corporate Governance _________________________________________________________________________________ 31 Countering Corruption _________________________________________________________________________________ 35 Procurement Management _____________________________________________________________________________ 38 Risk Management _____________________________________________________________________________________ 40 1. Production: Gazprom’s Contribution to National Development _____________________________________________ 49 1.1. Gas Supplies
    [Show full text]
  • Gazprom in Figures 2005–2009 Oao Gazprom Gazprom in Figures 2005–2009
    OAO GAZPROM GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2005–2009 OAO GAZPROM GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2005–2009 CONTEST Gazprom in Russian and world energy industry ..............................................................................................................4 Macroeconomic data........................................................................................................................................................6 Market data ......................................................................................................................................................................8 Reserves ........................................................................................................................................................................10 Licenses ........................................................................................................................................................................18 Production......................................................................................................................................................................20 Geologic exploration, production drilling and production capacity................................................................................25 Major projects in the field of hydrocarbon search, exploration, and production in foreign countries ..........................28 Promising fields in Russia ............................................................................................................................................38
    [Show full text]
  • Global Markets
    GLOBAL MARKETS RUSSIA'S ROLE IN THE GLOBAL ENERGY MARKETS Ivan Aleshkovski and Yana Mishchenko In the globalizing world the situation in global energy markets changes rapidly and dynamically. Energy and energy security are becoming an essential part of the global agenda. This article contains the analysis of the amounts of proved reserves of various hydrocarbons in Russia in comparison with those in the leading countries of the world. Production levels and export capabilities of the Russian fuel and energy sector are examined. The prospects of the devel- opment of Russia's energy cooperation with different countries are also being analyzed. Keywords: Russia, globalization, international energy cooperation, global en- ergy markets, energy resources trade, global energy, oil, natural gas, coal. Due to favourable geographical and geological circumstances Russia is an energy re- sources-rich and abundant country. It possesses considerable reserves of coal, natural gas, oil and other sources of energy. According to BP statistical data, in 2015 Russia's proved reserves of oil were 102.4 thousand million barrels which account for 6 per cent of world total reserves; the proved reserves of gas were 32.3 trillion cubic metres that accounted for 17.3 per cent of world total and the proved reserves of coal were 157,010 million tonnes (17.6 per cent) of world total proved reserves. In 2013, Russia's total primary energy supply (TPES) was 731 million tonnes of oil equivalent (711 Mtoe in 2014), comprising natural gas (54 per cent; 52 per cent in 2014), crude oil and petroleum products (22 per cent; 23 per cent in 2014), coal (15 per cent) and others, including nuclear and hydro (9.2 per cent; 10 per cent in 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Russian Oil Shipments in the Baltic Sea: Strategic Decision Or Environmental Risk?
    LAPPEENRANTA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Northern Dimension Research Centre Publication 2 Edited by Kari Liuhto GROWING RUSSIAN OIL SHIPMENTS IN THE BALTIC SEA: STRATEGIC DECISION OR ENVIRONMENTAL RISK? Lappeenranta University of Technology Northern Dimension Research Centre P.O.Box 20, FIN-53851 Lappeenranta, Finland Telephone: +358-5-621 11 Telefax: +358-5-621 2644 URL: www.lut.fi/nordi Lappeenranta 2003 ISBN 951-764-806-5 ISSN 1459-6679 2 Elena G. Efimova, Liudmila V. Popova, Sergei F. Sutyrin*1 Maritime Oil Transportation in the Baltic Sea: A Russian Perspective Content: 1. Introduction 2. Location of Russian Oil Reserves 3. Oil refining and transport infrastructure in the Northwest Russia 4. Oil terminals on the Russian part of the Baltic Sea 5. Major Russian actors 6. Strategic interests of major actors 7. Comparative advantages and disadvantages of Russian Baltic harbours 8. Conclusion: future prospects of the Russian ports in the Baltic Sea 1.Introduction In the last years the Russia’s attitude towards promising directions of oil and petro- leum products exports has become more clearly specified. One of the purposes of the energy strategy adopted by the government is a redirection of export flows of Russian oil from the Baltic countries (i.e., the former Baltic republics of the USSR), as well as from Finland and Ukraine to the Russian ports. According to officially accepted data, the Russian companies exporting oil and petroleum products through Baltic ports outside Russia incur annual losses of about 1.5 bln. USD.1 Respectively, the Russian budget loses significant revenues going on payment for transit and port handling services of the Baltic states.
    [Show full text]