Bike Sharing – Nový Fenomén V Cyklodopravě

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bike Sharing – Nový Fenomén V Cyklodopravě ČESKÉ VYSOKÉ UČENÍ TECHNICKÉ V PRAZE FAKULTA DOPRAVNÍ Bc. Jan Včala, DiS Bike sharing – nový fenomén v cyklodopravě Diplomová práce 2015 ČESKÉ VYSOKÉ UČENÍ TECHNICKÉ V PRAZE Bike sharing – nový fenomén v cyklodopravě Prohlášení Prohlašuji, že jsem předloženou práci vypracoval samostatně a že jsem uvedl veškeré použité informační zdroje v souladu s Metodickým pokynem o etické přípravě vysokoškolských závěrečných prací. Nemám závažný důvod proti užívání tohoto školního díla ve smyslu § 60 Zákona č. 121/2000 Sb., o právu autorském, o právech souvisejících s právem autorským a o změně některých zákonů (autorský zákon). V Praze dne 25. května 2015 ………………………. podpis 3 ČESKÉ VYSOKÉ UČENÍ TECHNICKÉ V PRAZE Bike sharing – nový fenomén v cyklodopravě Poděkování Zde bych rád poděkoval všem, kteří mi byli nápomocni během zpracovávání této práce. Obzvláště děkuji Ing. Tichému, Ph.D. za odborné vedení a za rady, které mi poskytoval nejen během psaní této DP, ale po celou dobu mého studia. Rovněž bych chtěl poděkovat pracovníkům systému HOMEPORT a projektu Rekola za poskytnutí mnoha důležitých informací a materiálů, bez nichž by vznik této práce nebyl možný. V neposlední řadě bych pak chtěl vyjádřit své nejhlubší díky mé rodině, přátelům a známým za trpělivost a podporu, které se mi dostávalo po celou dobu studia. 4 ČESKÉ VYSOKÉ UČENÍ TECHNICKÉ V PRAZE Bike sharing – nový fenomén v cyklodopravě ABSTRAKT Název práce: Bike sharing - nový fenomén v cyklodopravě Autor: Bc. Jan Včala, DiS. Ústav: Ústav logistiky a managementu dopravy (K617) Vedoucí práce: Ing. Jan Tichý, Ph.D. Rok: 2015 Předmětem této práce je provést rozbor a analýzu několika největších a nejúspěšnějších systémů sdílení kol z celého světa, společně se stanovením potenciálu pro budoucí rozvoj cyklodopravy na území hlavního města Prahy, a na základě těchto dat navrhnout a ekonomicky zhodnotit vlastní veřejný systém sdílení jízdních kol v ČR. KLÍČOVÁ SLOVA Bike sharing, sdílení kol, cyklistika, Praha, jízdní kolo, bicykl, udržitelná doprava ABSTRACT Title: Bike-sharing - The New Phenomenon in Cycling Author: Bc. Jan Včala, DiS. Department: Department of Logistics and Transport Management (K617) Supervisor: Ing. Jan Tichý, Ph.D. Year: 2015 The subject of this thesis is to analyze some of the biggest and most successful bike sharing systems in the world, alongside with the potential for the future development of transport cycling in the capital city of Prague, and to design and economically assess (on the basis of these data) own public bike sharing system in the Czech Republic. KEY WORDS Bike-sharing, Cycling, Prague, Bicycle, sustainable transport 5 ČESKÉ VYSOKÉ UČENÍ TECHNICKÉ V PRAZE Bike sharing – nový fenomén v cyklodopravě Obsah Obsah .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Seznam použitých zkratek ........................................................................................................ 8 1 Úvod do problematiky .................................................................................................... 9 2 Vývoj cyklodopravy a bike sharingu ........................................................................... 11 2.1 Vývoj cyklistiky a cyklodopravy .................................................................................... 11 2.1.1 Vznik a vývoj bicyklu ............................................................................................. 11 2.1.2 Postavení jízdních kol v moderní společnosti ....................................................... 14 2.2 Vznik a vývoj bike sharingu ......................................................................................... 15 2.2.1 Vývojové fáze bike sharingu ................................................................................. 16 3 Bike sharing ve světě ................................................................................................... 20 3.1 Evropa .......................................................................................................................... 26 3.1.1 Francie .................................................................................................................. 26 3.1.2 Velká Británie ........................................................................................................ 30 3.1.3 Španělsko ............................................................................................................. 32 3.1.4 Německo ............................................................................................................... 35 3.2 Asie + Oceánie ............................................................................................................ 38 3.2.1 Čína....................................................................................................................... 38 3.3 Severní Amerika .......................................................................................................... 40 3.3.1 USA ....................................................................................................................... 41 3.4 Jižní Amerika ............................................................................................................... 43 3.4.1 Brazílie .................................................................................................................. 43 3.5 Afrika + Střední východ ................................................................................................ 44 3.5.1 Izrael ..................................................................................................................... 44 4 Cyklodoprava a bike sharing v ČR .............................................................................. 46 4.1 Rozvoj cyklodopravy v ČR ........................................................................................... 47 4.1.1 Cyklodoprava v Praze ........................................................................................... 50 4.2 BSS na území ČR ....................................................................................................... 54 4.2.1 Rekola ................................................................................................................... 54 4.2.2 Homeport .............................................................................................................. 62 4.2.3 Ostatní .................................................................................................................. 64 6 ČESKÉ VYSOKÉ UČENÍ TECHNICKÉ V PRAZE Bike sharing – nový fenomén v cyklodopravě 5 Návrh systému sdílení kol v ČR a jeho ekonomické posouzení .............................. 67 5.1 Obecná charakteristika projektu .................................................................................. 68 5.2 Vlastní návrh systému ................................................................................................. 69 5.2.1 Stanice .................................................................................................................. 70 5.2.2 Jízdní kola ............................................................................................................. 80 5.2.3 Software ................................................................................................................ 82 5.3 Ekonomické posouzení BSS ....................................................................................... 85 5.3.1 Náklady ................................................................................................................. 86 5.3.2 Výnosy .................................................................................................................. 95 5.3.3 Celkové vyhodnocení investice .......................................................................... 103 6 Závěr ............................................................................................................................. 107 Použité zdroje ........................................................................................................................ 109 Seznam obrázků .................................................................................................................... 115 Seznam tabulek ..................................................................................................................... 117 Seznam příloh ........................................................................................................................ 118 7 ČESKÉ VYSOKÉ UČENÍ TECHNICKÉ V PRAZE Bike sharing – nový fenomén v cyklodopravě Seznam použitých zkratek B+R Bike & Ride BSS Bike Sharing System Systém sdílení kol CPU Central Processing Unit Centrální procesorová jednotka ČD České Dráhy ČS Česká spořitelna DB Deutsche Bahn IAD Individuální automobilová doprava IRR Internal Rate of Return Vnitřní výnosové procento MFF Mezinárodní filmový festival NPV Net Present Value Čistá současná hodnota PP Payback Period Doba návratnosti RFID Radio Frequency Identification Identifikace pomocí rádiové frekvence ROI Return on Investment Návratnost Investic SFDI Státní fond dopravní infrastruktury SW Software 8 ČESKÉ VYSOKÉ UČENÍ TECHNICKÉ V PRAZE Bike sharing – nový fenomén v cyklodopravě 1 Úvod do problematiky Mobilita je jednou ze základních lidských potřeb, jež se postupem času stala rovněž velice důležitým faktorem z hlediska ekonomického rozvoje a blahobytu daného regionu. Avšak v moderní společnosti se pojem „mobilita“ stává pro obyvatele řady velkých měst doslova
Recommended publications
  • Accessibility and the Crowded Sidewalk: Micromobility’S Impact on Public Space CYNTHIA L
    Accessibility and The Crowded Sidewalk: Micromobility’s Impact on Public Space CYNTHIA L. BENNETT Carnegie Mellon University, [email protected] EMILY E. ACKERMAN Univerisity of Pittsburgh, [email protected] BONNIE FAN Carnegie Mellon University, [email protected] JEFFREY P. BIGHAM Carnegie Mellon University, [email protected] PATRICK CARRINGTON Carnegie Mellon University, [email protected] SARAH E. FOX Carnegie Mellon University, [email protected] Over the past several years, micromobility devices—small-scale, networked vehicles used to travel short distances—have begun to pervade cities, bringing promises of sustainable transportation and decreased congestion. Though proponents herald their role in offering lightweight solutions to disconnected transit, smart scooters and autonomous delivery robots increasingly occupy pedestrian pathways, reanimating tensions around the right to public space. Drawing on interviews with disabled activists, government officials, and commercial representatives, we chart how devices and policies co-evolve to fulfill municipal sustainability goals, while creating obstacles for people with disabilities whose activism has long resisted inaccessible infrastructure. We reflect on efforts to redistribute space, institute tech governance, and offer accountability to those who involuntarily encounter interventions on the ground. In studying micromobility within spatial and political context, we call for the HCI community to consider how innovation transforms as it moves out from centers of development toward peripheries of design consideration. CCS CONCEPTS • Human-centered computing~Accessibility~Empirical studies in accessibility Additional Keywords and Phrases: Micromobility, Accessibility, Activism, Governance, Public space ACM Reference Format: Cynthia L. Bennett, Emily E. Ackerman, Bonnie Fan, Jeffrey P. Bigham, Patrick Carrington, and Sarah E. Fox. 2021. Accessibility and The Crowded Sidewalk: Micromobility’s Impact on Public Space.
    [Show full text]
  • Asemattomien Kaupunkipyörien Ohjeistus Kunnille Sisällys
    Liikenneviraston tutkimuksia ja selvityksiä 27/2018 Asemattomien kaupunkipyörien ohjeistus kunnille Sisällys Tiivistelmä sivu 3 Esipuhe sivu 4 Ohjeistuksen tausta ja tavoitteet sivu 5 Terminologia sivu 6 1. Asemattomien kaupunkipyörien lyhyt historia sivut 7-11 Liikenneviraston tutkimuksia ja 2. Asemattomien kaupunkipyörien tunnuspiirteet sivut 12-18 selvityksiä 3. Osana liikennejärjestelmää ja matkaketjuja sivut 19-23 4. Palvelun laatu ja käyttäjäkokemus sivut 24-30 27/2018 5. Pyöräilyn ja kaupunkipyörien imago sivut 31-34 6. Ansaintalogiikka ja rahoitusmallit sivut 35-43 7. Asemattomien kaupunkipyörien nykytila maailmalla ja Suomessa sivut 44-55 Verkkojulkaisu pdf 8. Sähköavusteiset kaupunkipyörät sivut 56-64 (www.liikennevirasto.fi) ISSN-L 1798-6656 9. Lainsäädäntö ja sen tulkinta sivut 65-71 ISSN 1798-6664 10. Suositukset ja pelisäännöt sivut 72-84 ISBN 978-952-317-547-1 Esimerkkejä kaupunkikohtaisista pelisäännöistä ja ohjeista sivu 85 Lähteet sivu 86 Liite: Keskeisimmät lainkohdat sivut 87-95 Tiivistelmä Asemattomat kaupunkipyörät perustuvat digitalisaation Suoraan lainsäädännöstä kumpuavat kuntien keinot ohjata tuomiin mahdollisuuksiin, kuten älykkäisiin lukkojärjestelmiin asemattomien kaupunkipyöräjärjestelmien toimittajia ja ja niitä tukeviin älypuhelinsovelluksiin. Nämä mahdollistavat operaattoreita ennakoivasti ovat rajalliset. pyörän jakamisen usean käyttäjän kesken ilman tarvetta erillisiin asemiin. Pyörät voivat olla pysäköitynä vapaisiin Voidakseen ohjata prosessia kunnan kannattaa aktiivisesti pyörätelineisiin tai niille
    [Show full text]
  • Sustaining Dockless Bike-Sharing Based on Business Principles
    Copyright Warning & Restrictions The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a, user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use” that user may be liable for copyright infringement, This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. Please Note: The author retains the copyright while the New Jersey Institute of Technology reserves the right to distribute this thesis or dissertation Printing note: If you do not wish to print this page, then select “Pages from: first page # to: last page #” on the print dialog screen The Van Houten library has removed some of the personal information and all signatures from the approval page and biographical sketches of theses and dissertations in order to protect the identity of NJIT graduates and faculty. ABSTRACT SUSTAINING DOCKLESS BIKE-SHARING BASED ON BUSINESS PRINCIPLES by Neil Horowitz Currently in urban areas, the value of money and fuel is increasing because of urban traffic congestion. As an environmentally sustainable and short-distance travel mode, dockless bike-sharing not only assists in resolving the issue of urban traffic congestion, but additionally assists in minimizing pollution, satisfying the demand of the last mile problem, and improving societal health.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Bicycle Schemes
    Division 44 Water, Energy and Transport Recommended Reading and Links on Public Bicycle Schemes September 2010 Reading List on Public Bicycle Schemes Preface Various cities around the world are trying methods to encourage bicycling as a sustainable transport mode. Among those methods in encouraging cycling implementing public bicycle schemes is one. The public bicycle schemes are also known as bicycle sharing systems, community bicycling schemes etc., The main idea of a public bicycle system is that the user need not own a bicycle but still gain the advantages of bicycling by renting a bicycle provided by the scheme for a nominal fee or for free of charge (as in some cities). Most of these schemes enable people to realize one way trips, because the users needn’t to return the bicycles to the origin, which will avoid unnecessary travel. Public bicycle schemes provide not only convenience for trips in the communities, they can also be a good addition to the public transport system. Encouraging public bike systems have shown that there can be numerous short that could be made by a bicycle instead of using motorised modes. Public bike schemes also encourage creative designs in bikes and also in the operational mechanisms. The current document is one of the several efforts of GTZ-Sustainable Urban Transport Project to bring to the policymakers an easy to access list of available material on Public Bike Schemes (PBS) which can be used in their everyday work. The document aims to list out some influential and informative resources that highlight the importance of PBS in cities and how the existing situation could be improved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bike- Share Planning Guide
    THE BIKE- SHARE PLANNING GUIDE Introduction Sub 1 Introduction Sub 2 THE BIKE- SHARE PLANNING GUIDE Introduction Sub 3 The Bike-share Planning Guide Cover Photo: Mexico City's Ecobici has helped to increase cycling mode share in Mexico City. Cover Photo By: Udayalaksmanakartiyasa Halim 9 East 19th Street, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10003 tel +1 212 629 8001 www.itdp.org Introduction Sub 4 Authors and Acknowledgements The writing of this report was a collaborative effort across ITDP and our partners. Contributing authors include: Aimee Gauthier, Colin Hughes, Christopher Kost, Shanshan Li, Clarisse Linke, Stephanie Lotshaw, Jacob Mason, Carlosfelipe Pardo, Clara Rasore, Bradley Schroeder, and Xavier Treviño. The authors would also like to thank Christopher Van Eyken, Jemilah Magnusson, and Gabriel Lewenstein for their support in the creation of the guide. ITDP is especially grateful to the following people for providing comments on and contributions to sections of this report: Alison Cohen, Director of Bike Share Services, Toole Design Group (with many thanks to Shomik Mehndiratta and the World Bank for their support of Ms. Cohen’s research) Dani Simons, Director of Marketing, NYC Bike Share Matteo Martignoni, International Human Powered Vehicle Association and former ITDP board member Jeff Olson, Alta Planning and Design Chris Holben, former Project Manager for Capital Bikeshare District Department of Transportation. Introduction Sub 5 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 8 1.1 The Benefits of Bike-share 14 1.2 History of Bike-share 19 1.3 New Developments and Trends 25 1.4 Building Political Will 26 1.5 Elements of Bike-share 27 2 THE PLANNING PROCESS 28 AND FEASIBILITY STUDY 2.1 Overview of Planning Process 30 2.2 Feasibility Study 32 2.3 Bike-Share Metrics 40 2.3.1 Basic Context Data and System Metrics 40 2.3.2 Performance Metrics 41 2.4 Coverage Area 43 2.5 System Sizing: Three Basic 44 Planning Parameters 2.6 Financial Analysis 48 3 DETAILED PLANNING AND DESIGN 52 3.1 Station Location 57 3.2 Station Sizing 63 3.3 Station Type and Design 64 3.3.1 Manual vs.
    [Show full text]
  • BICYCLE SHARING in CHINA: PAST, PRESENT, and FUTURE Naidong Zhao Beijing Institute of Fashion Technology, [email protected]
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) SAIS 2018 Proceedings Southern (SAIS) Spring 3-23-2018 BICYCLE SHARING IN CHINA: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE Naidong Zhao Beijing Institute of Fashion Technology, [email protected] Xihui Zhang University of North Alabama, [email protected] M. Shane Banks University of North Alabama, [email protected] Mingke Xiong Beijing Normal University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/sais2018 Recommended Citation Zhao, Naidong; Zhang, Xihui; Banks, M. Shane; and Xiong, Mingke, "BICYCLE SHARING IN CHINA: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE" (2018). SAIS 2018 Proceedings. 11. https://aisel.aisnet.org/sais2018/11 This material is brought to you by the Southern (SAIS) at AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). It has been accepted for inclusion in SAIS 2018 Proceedings by an authorized administrator of AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). For more information, please contact [email protected]. Zhao et al. Bicycle Sharing in China: Past, Present, and Future BICYCLE SHARING IN CHINA: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE Naidong Zhao Xihui Zhang Beijing Institute of Fashion Technology University of North Alabama [email protected] [email protected] M. Shane Banks Mingke Xiong University of North Alabama Beijing Normal University [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper systematically explicates the historical developmental stages of China’s bicycle sharing economy including current and future business models. This paper also identifies problems that exist in the evolution of China’s bicycle sharing and provides potential solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Guideline for Bike Rental Transdanube.Pearls Final Draft
    Transdanube.Pearls - Network for Sustainable Mobility along the Danube http://www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls Guideline for bike rental Transdanube.Pearls Final Draft WP/Action 3.1 Author: Inštitút priestorového plánovania Version/Date 3.0, 23.11.2017 Document Revision/Approval Version Date Status Date Status 3.0 23/11/2017 Final draft xx.xx.xxxx final Contacts Coordinator: Bratislava Self-governing Region Sabinovská 16, P.O. Box 106 820 05 Bratislava web: www.region-bsk.sk Author: Inštitút priestorového plánovania Ľubľanská 1 831 02 Bratislava web: http://ipp.szm.com More information about Transdanube.Pearls project are available at www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls Page 2 of 41 www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls Abbreviations BSS Bike Sharing Scheme ECF European Cyclists´ Federation POI Point of Interest PT Public Transport Page 3 of 41 www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls Table of content Contacts ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Bike Rental ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Execuive summary ................................................................................................................................................. 5 1. Best practice examples from across
    [Show full text]
  • Public Bicycles
    New Seamless Mobility Services Public Bicycles 4 PolicyPliocyoeslli y notes t NICHES is a Coordination Action funded by the European Commission under the Sixth Framework Programme for R&D, Priority 6.2 Sustainable Surface Transport What is it about? Characteristics Public Bicycles: • are innovative schemes of rental or free bicycles in urban areas; Example: Vélo’v in Lyon • can be used for daily mobility as one-way-use is possible and they can be seen as part of the public How did the French City of Lyon transport system; encourage thousands of people to • differ from traditional, mostly leisure-oriented bicycle use the bicycle as urban transport rental services as they provide fast and easy access; mode within a few months? • have diversifi ed in organisational layout, the business A big part of this success story is models and the applied technology towards “smart bikes” due to the introduction of the (rental process via smart card or mobile phone). Public Bicycle scheme vélo’v. Each of the 2,000 bicycles available The transferability of Public Bicycle schemes to cities at racks throughout the city centre with appropriate framework conditions for cycling has is used on average 16 times on a been proven in many cases (e.g. in France, Germany, typical summer day. Within the Scandinavia and Spain). fi rst six months after its introduction, 2 Million trips were made with the Public Bicycles, Key benefi ts replacing around 150,000 car trips. In combination with the The implementation of a Public Bicycle scheme... increased use of private bicycles, • provides a fast, convenient and fl exible inner urban the scheme helped to increase the transport option; bicycle share in the modal split.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Bicycle Schemes: Applying The
    Division 44 Water, Energy, Transport Public Bicycle Schemes: Applying the Concept in Developing Cities Examples from India Sustainable Urban Transport Technical Document # 3 By Chhavi Dhingra and Santhosh Kodukula About the authors Chhavi Dhingra is a civil engineer and has a of articles in reputed journals, newspapers Master’s Degree in transportation engineer- and magazines and contributed to numerous ing from the Asian Institute of Technology, research and policy documents. She is currently Thailand. For the last six years, she has been a part of GTZ’s Sustainable Urban Transport researching on issues related to sustainable Project (SUTP) team. transport and urban development policy and Santhosh Kodukula has a Master’s Degree in planning, in the developing country context. Environmental Management from Mahidol As a part of her research activities, she has University, Thailand, where he specialised in conducted detailed mobility assessments in Urban and Regional Planning with focus on Indian cities like Bangalore, Surat, Shillong Transport Planning and Management. For and Hyderabad, studied access issues for energy the last five years, Santhosh has been working services for the urban poor in Delhi, conducted training needs assessments for urban transport with the GTZ-Sustainable Urban Transport personnel in India, and developed a framework Project (SUTP) providing technical assistance for sustainable urban public transport provi- and implementing project activities in Asia and sion in Indian cities. She has also authored/ Pacific. He has been involved in the design and contributed to government reports on topics delivery of over 70 training courses on sustain- like impact assessment of rural road projects in able urban mobility and transport targeted at India, review of state transport plans, sustain- policy-makers and urban and transport planners ability reporting on the status of urban trans- in various countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Action Plan for Integration of LEZ Policies in the Mobility Planning in 11 2017 Turin’S FUA
    WPT1 SOLEZ Action Plans for an effective usage of LEZ and other access restriction schemes in project territories Activity A.T1.3 Elaboration of SOLEZ Action Plans in the 8 project target FUAs Deliverable D.T.1.3.6 Version 1 Action Plan for integration of LEZ policies in the mobility planning in 11 2017 Turin’s FUA Author: Municipality of Turin Version: Date of version: 1.0 30/11/2017 Project: SOLEZ Duration of the project: 36 Months Project coordination: Vicenza Municipality The sole responsibility for the content of this document lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union 2 A T 1.3 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ..................................................................................................4 Introduction ............................................................................................4 The context of the Functional Urban Area of Torino ............................................4 Current push measures at FUA level ...............................................................4 Current pull measures at FUA level ................................................................5 Future strategies at FUA level ......................................................................5 Future measures at FUA level .......................................................................6 1 Premessa .......................................................................................... 11 2 Lo scenario attuale nell’Area Urbana Funzionale di Torino ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Carpooling 64 5
    1 4° Rapporto nazionale sulla sharing mobility Il rapporto sulla sharing mobility è redatto dalla Sezione mobilità della Fondazione per lo sviluppo sostenibile con il coordinamento di Massimo Ciuffini. La banca dati con cui è possibile la redazione del Rapporto è popolata nel quadro dell’iniziativa dell’Osservatorio nazionale della sharing mobility, promosso da Ministero dell’Ambiente della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, dal Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei trasporti e dalla Fondazione per lo sviluppo sostenibile. Si ringraziano in particolare Gianfranco Romano del Ministero dell’Ambiente e Antonio Marasco del Ministero dei Trasporti, tutte le amministrazioni locali e gli operatori di servizi di sharing mobility che, come membri del network dell’Osservatorio, hanno condiviso i dati in loro possesso su base volontaria e con la consueta accuratezza. Un ringraziamento speciale va ad Amat Milano, Valentino Sevino e Adriano Loporcaro per la grande mole di dati raccolta e trasmessa all’Osservatorio e per l’iniziativa di questa primavera di pubblicare dei rapporti settimanali sulla mobilità milanese. Altro speciale ringraziamento va a SRM Bologna, a Tommaso Bonino e Cristina Baccellieri, per la grande completezza e accuratezza dei dati forniti per i servizi di sharing della città di Bologna. Autori: M. Ciuffini, S. Asperti, V. Gentili, R. Orsini, L. Refrigeri 2020 - Fondazione per lo sviluppo sostenibile ISBN: 979-12-80310-00-2 2 Indice 1. Carsharing 4 2. Micromobilità in sharing 14 3. FOCUS: I servizi di bikesharing in Italia: dati e assetti di governance 35 4. Carpooling 64 5. FOCUS: Il carpooling e la legge francese d'orientamento sulle mobilità (LOM, 2019) 70 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Bike Sharing, Analisi Dei Sistemi Italiani E Valutazione Della Propensione Turistica in Funzione Dell‘Offerta Integrata
    Corso di Laurea magistrale (ordinamento ex D.M. 270/2004) In Sviluppo Interculturale dei Sistemi Turistici Tesi di Laurea Bike sharing, analisi dei sistemi italiani e valutazione della propensione turistica in funzione dell‘offerta integrata Relatore Ch. Prof. Jan Van der Borg Laureando Giorgia Giubilato Matricola 819242 Anno Accademico 2012/2013 SOMMARIO INTRODUZIONE ................................................................................................ 8 1. IL BIKE SHARING, CONTESTO ED EVOLUZIONE STORICA ................... 11 1.1. Bike sharing ...................................................................................... 11 1.1.1. Definizione ................................................................................. 12 1.1.2. Efficacia e problematicità del bike sharing ................................. 15 1.2. Evoluzione nel tempo ....................................................................... 17 1.2.1. Prima generazione: Amsterdam ................................................ 17 1.2.2. Seconda generazione: sistema a deposito ................................ 18 1.2.3. Terza generazione: l‘uso della tecnologia .................................. 19 1.2.4. Quarta generazione: interazione utenza-sistema ...................... 22 1.3. Obiettivi e benefici dei sistemi di bike sharing ................................... 24 1.4. Diffusione .......................................................................................... 29 1.5. Domanda .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]