Infanticide by an Eastern Phoebe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Infanticide by an Eastern Phoebe 620 THE WILSON JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY N Vol. 122, No. 3, September 2010 The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 122(3):620–622, 2010 Infanticide by an Eastern Phoebe Gary Ritchison1,2 and Brandon T. Ritchison1 ABSTRACT.—We videotaped an Eastern Phoebe infanticide by non-breeding males may enhance their (Sayornis phoebe) nest in central Kentucky on 22 June reproductive success if the resident female or a new 2008 and documented a case of infanticide. An adult female subsequently pairs with the male and initiates a male phoebe, likely the resident male, was captured at new nest. Received 11 January 2010. Accepted 24 the nest site on 21 June 2008. The resident female fed March 2010. nestlings (3, ,8 days of age) 69 times during a 4.1-hr taping session (0815–1221 hrs EDT) the next day, but the resident male was not observed at the nest. Infanticide has been reported in many species of Beginning at 0923 hrs, an intruding phoebe (likely a male) occasionally visited the nest, sometimes pecking birds, primarily in cooperative breeders, colonial at, but not feeding, the nestlings; this phoebe initiated a breeders, and polygamous species (Freed 1986). vigorous attack at 1151 hrs, pecking and pulling the Infanticide has been reported among socially head of one of the nestlings for 25 min before pulling it monogamous species of birds, but primarily species out of the nest. The intruding phoebe returned after a where breeding opportunities may be limited by short absence, just before the end of the videotape, and biased sex ratios or availability of needed resources began attacking another nestling. The nest was empty such as nest sites (Freed 1986; Robertson and when checked the next day. Suitable territories and nest sites may be limiting factors for Eastern Phoebes, and Stutchbury 1988; Møller 1988, 2004). Infanticide may be adaptive either by providing access to a 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Eastern Kentucky needed resource, such as a nest site (Robertson and University, Richmond, KY 40475, USA. Stutchbury 1988), or by shortening the time until a 2 Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected] new breeding attempt (Freed 1986). SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 621 Most reports of infanticide among socially behaving differently, was first observed at 0923 monogamous species have involved secondary hrs. Over the next 42 min, this phoebe hovered cavity-nesting species where availability of nest near the nest twice, briefly landed on the edge of sites may limit breeding opportunities (Freed the nest three times, and pecked the head of a 1986, Robertson and Stutchbury 1988, Kermott nestling during two of those nest visits. et al. 1991). We report a case of infanticide by an During the third hour of taping (1015–1115 Eastern Phoebe (Sayornis phoebe), a non-cavity- hrs), the resident female fed nestlings 16 times; nesting species with specific nest-site require- the other phoebe entered the shelter and perched ments that may limit breeding opportunities of on the camcorder four times, but did not visit the some individuals. nest. The resident female continued provisioning nestlings during the fourth hour of taping (1115– OBSERVATIONS 1215 hrs). The ‘intruding’ phoebe entered the We studied Eastern Phoebes at the Blue Grass shelter and perched on the camcorder 21 times Army Depot (BGAD) from mid-March to mid- from 1115 to 1145 hrs, uttering ‘bipeaked July 2008. The BGAD is in Madison County, vocalizations’ (Smith 1969) on multiple occasions Kentucky and encompasses 5,907 ha of pastures and ‘initial peaked vocalizations’ (Smith 1969) with trees and woodlands interspersed throughout. twice. The female visited the nest three times Concrete shelters (about 2.5 3 5 3 2.5 m; n 5 while the other phoebe was on the camcorder; the 54), each with two open doors (1 3 2m)at presence of the intruding phoebe had no apparent opposite corners occur throughout the depot to effect on the female’s behavior. provide depot personnel with protection in case of The intruding phoebe flew to the nest at 1151 emergencies. The shelters are rarely visited by hrs and began vigorously pecking and pulling Army personnel, but phoebes readily enter the one of the nestlings, focusing its attack on the shelters to nest. nestling’s head. This phoebe pecked or pulled at We located a phoebe nest on 21 June 2008 with the nestling about 1,250 times (,50 times/min) three nestlings ,8 days of age in a shelter that, for over the next 25 min. The resident female came security reasons, we visited infrequently. An adult to the nest ,5 sec after the attack was initiated, phoebe entering the shelter was captured in a mist hovered briefly at the edge, then landed with net on the same day and banded with a USGS beak agape and moved to within ,2 cm of the aluminum band and a unique combination of three attacker for ,3 sec. The female then flew from colored-plastic bands. The phoebe was identified the nest, returning 5 sec later and again briefly as a male based on the presence of a cloacal hovered near the nest. As the attack continued, protuberance. Standard measurements were taken the female left and re-entered the shelter and and the male, in apparently good condition, was perched on the camcorder three times (but released. uttered no calls), and flew to the nest and The nest was videotaped from 0815 to 1221 hrs provisioned nestlings five times, uttering no EDT on 22 June 2008 with a camcorder placed vocalizations and not interacting with the 2 m from the nest. The camcorder was protected attacking phoebe. The intruding phoebe pulled from the elements in the shelter so we did not the apparently dead nestling out of the nest at the retrieve the videotape until the next day (23 Jun conclusion of the 25-min attack, and returned to 2008). We subsequently reviewed the tape and the nest ,4.5 min later and began attacking a noted all visits to the nest by adult phoebes as well second nestling. The videotape ended 40 sec as any other recorded behaviors or vocalizations. after this second attack began. An unbanded Eastern Phoebe, apparently the The nest was empty when visited the next day resident female, provisioned nestlings at a rate of with no sign of adult or nestling phoebes in the 16.8 visits/hr during the 4.1-hr videotape; the shelter. We re-visited the shelter 12 days later; the phoebe banded the previous day (assumed to be nest was still empty and we observed no adult the resident male) was not observed at the nest. phoebes in or near the shelter. The female phoebe visited the nest and provi- sioned nestlings 35 times from 0815 to 1015 hrs, DISCUSSION and always exhibited the same behavior, landing Male Eastern Phoebes typically provision at the edge of the nest and quickly feeding a nestlings and defend nest sites and territories nestling. Another phoebe, also unbanded, but from conspecifics (Weeks 1994). Thus, the 622 THE WILSON JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY N Vol. 122, No. 3, September 2010 absence of the male at our focal nest plus the rarely initiated after late June (GR, pers. obs.). presence of the intruding phoebe suggests the A male phoebe acquiring a territory with 8-day- resident male was not present. The male we old nestlings on 22 or 23 June, as in our study, banded at the nest site, likely the resident male, would likely have no opportunity to breed appeared to be in good condition when released. during the current breeding season if those The reason for the male’s absence is unknown, but nestlings developed normally and fledged (gen- could have been due either to abandonment of the erally when 16–18 days of age; Weeks 1994). territory (e.g., as a result of being captured in a Infanticide could potentially provide a male mist net) or predation. phoebe with a breeding opportunity. However, Our observations indicate adult Eastern Phoe- the nest in our study was empty when checked bes at times engage in infanticide. Beheler et al. 12 days later and we observed no phoebes in or (2003:996) also noted instances of infanticide near the shelter, indicating the infanticidal male (‘probably by nonparental adults’) by Eastern phoebe in our study did not subsequently breed Phoebes, and Weeks (1994) reported that infan- in that shelter. ticide at times occurred after a territorial male phoebe disappeared. Phoebes are sexually mono- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS morphic and both males and females utter We thank the U.S. Army for allowing us to conduct ‘bipeaked’ and ‘initial peaked’ vocalizations research at their facility, the EKU Research Committee for (Smith 1969). Thus, we cannot be certain the financial support, and C. E. Braun, H. P. Weeks Jr., and an intruding phoebe in our study was a male. anonymous reviewer for helpful comments. A short video However, the absence of the resident male clip of the infanticidal phoebe attacking and removing the suggests the infanticidal phoebe was a male. nestling is posted at http://www.youtube.com/watch?- Infanticide by male phoebes may enhance repro- v54mVQMpyqlrs. ductive success if the resident female or a new female subsequently pairs with the infanticidal LITERATURE CITED male and initiates another nest. This behavior has BEHELER, A. S., O. E. RHODES JR., AND H. P. WEEKS JR. 2003. been reported in other species of songbirds, Breeding site and mate fidelity in Eastern Phoebes including House Wrens (Troglodytes aedon; (Sayornis phoebe) in Indiana. Auk 120:990–999. Freed 1986, Kermott et al. 1991), Tree Swallows FREED, L. A. 1986. Territory takeover and sexually selected (Tachycineta bicolor; Robertson and Stutchbury infanticide in tropical House Wrens.
Recommended publications
  • Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with Birds Observed Off-Campus During BIOL3400 Field Course
    Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with birds observed off-campus during BIOL3400 Field course Photo Credit: Talton Cooper Species Descriptions and Photos by students of BIOL3400 Edited by Troy A. Ladine Photo Credit: Kenneth Anding Links to Tables, Figures, and Species accounts for birds observed during May-term course or winter bird counts. Figure 1. Location of Environmental Studies Area Table. 1. Number of species and number of days observing birds during the field course from 2005 to 2016 and annual statistics. Table 2. Compilation of species observed during May 2005 - 2016 on campus and off-campus. Table 3. Number of days, by year, species have been observed on the campus of ETBU. Table 4. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during the off-campus trips. Table 5. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during a winter count of birds on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Table 6. Species observed from 1 September to 1 October 2009 on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Alphabetical Listing of Birds with authors of accounts and photographers . A Acadian Flycatcher B Anhinga B Belted Kingfisher Alder Flycatcher Bald Eagle Travis W. Sammons American Bittern Shane Kelehan Bewick's Wren Lynlea Hansen Rusty Collier Black Phoebe American Coot Leslie Fletcher Black-throated Blue Warbler Jordan Bartlett Jovana Nieto Jacob Stone American Crow Baltimore Oriole Black Vulture Zane Gruznina Pete Fitzsimmons Jeremy Alexander Darius Roberts George Plumlee Blair Brown Rachel Hastie Janae Wineland Brent Lewis American Goldfinch Barn Swallow Keely Schlabs Kathleen Santanello Katy Gifford Black-and-white Warbler Matthew Armendarez Jordan Brewer Sheridan A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status and Occurrence of Black Phoebe (Sayornis Nigricans) in British Columbia
    The Status and Occurrence of Black Phoebe (Sayornis nigricans) in British Columbia. By Rick Toochin. Introduction and Distribution The Black Phoebe (Sayornis nigricans) is a small passerine belonging to the tyrant-flycatcher family. The Black Phoebe occurs as a year-round resident throughout most of its range; however, its northern populations are partially migratory (Wahl et al. 2005). It is a species found throughout the year from southwestern Oregon south, through California including the Baja Peninsula (excluding the central regions of the Peninsula), east through Arizona, New Mexico, southern Colorado, west Texas, south through Mexico, Central America to Panama (excluding El Salvador) and in South America from the coastal mountains of Venezuela, through Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru, to western Bolivia and northwestern Argentina (Sibley 2000, Howell and Webb 2010, Hoyo et al. 2006). In the past couple of decades the Black Phoebe has been slowly expanding its known range northward into northern Oregon and southern Washington where it is still considered a very rare visitor, but with records increasing every year (Wahl et al. 2005, WBRC 2012). The Black Phoebe has been recorded from Idaho, Nevada, Utah, southern Oklahoma and Florida (Sibley 2000). The Black Phoebe is an accidental visitor to south-central Alaska (Gibson et al. 2013). In British Columbia this species is considered a casual visitor but Provincial records, like those of Washington State, are on the rise and the status of this species in British Columbia could change in the near future. Identification and Similar Species The Black Phoebe has a huge range that encompasses two continents.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird List of San Bernardino Ranch in Agua Prieta, Sonora, Mexico
    Bird List of San Bernardino Ranch in Agua Prieta, Sonora, Mexico Melinda Cárdenas-García and Mónica C. Olguín-Villa Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico Abstract—Interest and investigation of birds has been increasing over the last decades due to the loss of their habitats, and declination and fragmentation of their populations. San Bernardino Ranch is located in the desert grassland region of northeastern Sonora, México. Over the last decade, restoration efforts have tried to address the effects of long deteriorating economic activities, like agriculture and livestock, that used to take place there. The generation of annual lists of the wildlife (flora and fauna) will be important information as we monitor the progress of restoration of this area. As part of our professional training, during the summer and winter (2011-2012) a taxonomic list of bird species of the ranch was made. During this season, a total of 85 species and 65 genera, distributed over 30 families were found. We found that five species are on a risk category in NOM-059-ECOL-2010 and 76 species are included in the Red List of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). It will be important to continue this type of study in places that are at- tempting restoration and conservation techniques. We have observed a huge change, because of restoration activities, in the lands in the San Bernardino Ranch. Introduction migratory (Villaseñor-Gómez et al., 2010). Twenty-eight of those species are considered at risk on a global scale, and are included in Birds represent one of the most remarkable elements of our en- the Red List of the International Union for Conservation of Nature vironment, because they’re easy to observe and it’s possible to find (IUCN).
    [Show full text]
  • An Apparent Hybrid Black × Eastern Phoebe from Colorado Nathan D
    AN APPARENT HYBRID BLACK × EASTERN PHOEBE FROM COLORADO NATHAN D. PIEPLOW, University of Colorado, 317 UCB, Boulder, Colorado 80309; [email protected] TONY LEUKERING, P. O. Box 660, Brighton, Colorado 80601 ELAINE COLEY, 290 Riker Court, Loveland, Colorado 80537 ABSTRACT: From 21 April to 11 May 2007 an apparent hybrid male Black × Eastern Phoebe (Sayornis nigricans × S. phoebe) was observed in Loveland, Larimer County, Colorado. The bird’s plumage was intermediate between the species, with paler upperparts, darker flanks, and a less distinct border between dark and white on the breast than expected on the Black Phoebe and darker upperparts, less head/back contrast, and a darker and more sharply demarcated upper breast than expected on the Eastern. Sonograms of the bird’s territorial song show numerous characteristics intermediate between the typical songs of the two species. Although the Colorado bird provides the first strong evidence of hybridization in Sayornis, other sightings suggest the Black and Eastern Phoebes may have hybridized on other recent occa- sions. Range expansions of both species may increase the frequency of hybridization in the future. The Black (Sayornis nigricans) and Eastern (S. phoebe) Phoebes are similar medium-sized flycatchers that historically occupied allopatric breed- ing ranges. The Eastern Phoebe is a common breeding species of mixed woodlands, riparian gallery forest, and human-altered habitats, nesting on cliffs, banks, and man-made structures in the eastern two-thirds of the lower 48 states and in Canada from Nova Scotia west and north to southwestern Nunavut and northeastern British Columbia (Weeks 1994). The Great Plains were probably a barrier to the species’ range expansion until channelization and stabilization of river banks encouraged the growth of extensive gallery forests along east-flowing rivers, particularly the South Platte andA rkansas (Knopf 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Learn About Texas Birds Activity Book
    Learn about . A Learning and Activity Book Color your own guide to the birds that wing their way across the plains, hills, forests, deserts and mountains of Texas. Text Mark W. Lockwood Conservation Biologist, Natural Resource Program Editorial Direction Georg Zappler Art Director Elena T. Ivy Educational Consultants Juliann Pool Beverly Morrell © 1997 Texas Parks and Wildlife 4200 Smith School Road Austin, Texas 78744 PWD BK P4000-038 10/97 All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means – graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or information storage and retrieval systems – without written permission of the publisher. Another "Learn about Texas" publication from TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE PRESS ISBN- 1-885696-17-5 Key to the Cover 4 8 1 2 5 9 3 6 7 14 16 10 13 20 19 15 11 12 17 18 19 21 24 23 20 22 26 28 31 25 29 27 30 ©TPWPress 1997 1 Great Kiskadee 16 Blue Jay 2 Carolina Wren 17 Pyrrhuloxia 3 Carolina Chickadee 18 Pyrrhuloxia 4 Altamira Oriole 19 Northern Cardinal 5 Black-capped Vireo 20 Ovenbird 6 Black-capped Vireo 21 Brown Thrasher 7Tufted Titmouse 22 Belted Kingfisher 8 Painted Bunting 23 Belted Kingfisher 9 Indigo Bunting 24 Scissor-tailed Flycatcher 10 Green Jay 25 Wood Thrush 11 Green Kingfisher 26 Ruddy Turnstone 12 Green Kingfisher 27 Long-billed Thrasher 13 Vermillion Flycatcher 28 Killdeer 14 Vermillion Flycatcher 29 Olive Sparrow 15 Blue Jay 30 Olive Sparrow 31 Great Horned Owl =female =male Texas Birds More kinds of birds have been found in Texas than any other state in the United States: just over 600 species.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Wood-Pewee,Contopus Virens
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Eastern Wood-pewee Contopus virens in Canada Photo: courtesy Carl Savignac SPECIAL CONCERN 2012 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2012. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Eastern Wood-pewee Contopus virens in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. x + 39 pp. (www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default_e.cfm). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Carl Savignac for writing the status report on the Eastern Wood- pewee, Contopus virens, in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. The report was overseen and edited by Jon McCracken, COSEWIC Birds Specialist Subcommittee Co-chair. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le Pioui de l’Est (Contopus virens) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Eastern Wood-pewee — Photo: courtesy Carl Savignac. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2013. Catalogue No. CW69-14/663-2013E-PDF ISBN 978-1-100-22136-6 Recycled paper COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – November 2012 Common name Eastern Wood-pewee Scientific name Contopus virens Status Special Concern Reason for designation This species is one of the most common and widespread songbirds associated with North America’s eastern forests.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bird's Eye View of the Forest
    A BIRD’S EYE VIEW OF THE FOREST: HOW DOES CANOPY OPENNESS AFFECT CANOPY SONGBIRDS? A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Felicity L. Newell Graduate Program in Natural Resources ***** The Ohio State University 2010 Master’s Committee: Dr. Amanda Rodewald, Advisor Dr. Roger Williams Dr. Paul Rodewald Copyright Felicity L. Newell 2010 ABSTRACT Today, the majority of eastern deciduous forests in North America are closed- canopy mature second-growth. In contrast, an open forest canopy is thought to have been important in presettlement forest ecosystems. Changes in forest structure are of special concern given that oaks ( Quercus spp.) cannot regenerate effectively in closed-canopy stands. Although oaks have historically dominated many eastern forests, forest composition is changing due to anthropogenic impacts on disturbance regimes. Consequently, many forest management efforts now aim to promote oak regeneration and restore forest structure, which ultimately will require a more complete understanding of the ecological processes associated with canopy disturbance. Partial harvesting (e.g. shelterwoods) provides one way to examine the importance of canopy openness. My research examined the link between canopy openness and birds that nest and forage in the forest canopy. Specifically I examined the extent to which (1) canopy songbirds select particular canopy features and (2) canopy structure affects reproductive success. I compared measures of preference (abundance, settlement patterns, site fidelity, and age distributions) and fitness (e.g. nesting success) between recent shelterwood harvests and unharvested second-growth stands in mixed-oak forests of southern Ohio.
    [Show full text]
  • Vermilion Flycatcher and Black Phoebe Feeding on Fish
    SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 377 in the field. K. Harms assisted in the collection of field data, and I? Grant, K. Harms, and H. Horn made helpful comments on early drafts of the manuscript. I also thank D. Lanning for comments on the manuscript, as well as A. Nores and M. Nores for allowing me to include unpublished data. LITERATURE CITED FORSHAW, J. M. 1989. Parrots of the world. 3rd edition. Lansdowne Editions, Sydney, Australia. HUMPHREY, I? S. AND R. T. PETERSON. 1978. Nesting behavior and affinities of Monk Par- akeets of southern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Wilson Bull. 90544-552. LANNING, D. V. 1991. Distribution and nest sites of the monk parakeet in Bolivia. Wilson Bull. 103:366-372. NORES, A. I. AND M. NORES. 1994. Nest building and nesting behavior of the Brown Cacholote. Wilson Bull. 106:106-120. JESSICA R. EBERHARD,Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton Univ., Princeton, New Jersey 08544-1003. Received 20 April 1995, accepted 15 Oct. 1995. Wilson Bull., 108(2), 1996, pp. 377-378 Vermilion Flycatcher and Black Phoebe feeding on fish.-We describe our observa- tions of two species of flycatchers, the Vermilion Flycatcher (Pyrocephalus rubinus) and the Black Phoebe (Sayomis nigricans) feeding on fish. Observations of Black Phoebes capturing fish have been noted as unusual (Bent 1942, Lawson 1975), and this is the first account of a Vermilion Flycatcher feeding on fish (Bent 1942, Terres 1980). We made these observations at the Hassayampa River Rest Area approximately 6 km southeast of Wickenburg, Maricopa County, Arizona. On 2 Dec. 1993, we observed an adult male Vermilion Flycatcher eating a small fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Abbreviations for Common Names of Birds M
    Standard abbreviations for common names of birds M. Kathleen Klirnkiewicz I and Chandler $. I•obbins 2 During the past two decadesbanders have taken The system we proposefollows five simple rules their work more seriouslyand have begun record- for abbreviating: ing more and more informationregarding the birds they are banding. To facilitate orderly record- 1. If the commonname is a singleword, use the keeping,bird observatories(especially Manomet first four letters,e.g., Canvasback, CANV. and Point Reyes)have developedstandard record- 2. If the common name consistsof two words, use ing forms that are now available to banders.These the first two lettersof the firstword, followed by forms are convenientfor recordingbanding data the first two letters of the last word, e.g., manually, and they are designed to facilitate Common Loon, COLO. automateddata processing. 3. If the common name consists of three words Because errors in species codes are frequently (with or without hyphens),use the first letter of detectedduring editing of bandingschedules, the the first word, the first letter of the secondword, Bird BandingOffices feel that bandersshould use and the first two lettersof the third word, e.g., speciesnames or abbreviationsthereof rather than Pied-billed Grebe, PBGR. only the AOU or speciescode numbers on their field sheets.Thus, it is essentialthat any recording 4. If the common name consists of four words form have provision for either common names, (with or without hypens), use the first letter of Latin names, or a suitable abbreviation. Most each word, •.g., Great Black-backed Gull, recordingforms presentlyin use have a 4-digit GBBG.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Occurrence of Vermilion Flycatcher (Pyrocephalus Rubinus) in British Columbia
    Status and Occurrence of Vermilion Flycatcher (Pyrocephalus rubinus) in British Columbia. By Rick Toochin and Don Cecile. Submitted: April 15, 2018. Introduction and Distribution The Vermillion Flycatcher (Pyrocephalus rubinus) is a spectacular plumaged passerine that is found from the arid deserts of the southern United States, throughout Central America, and throughout South America, including the Galapagos Islands (Fitzpatrick et al. 2004). This species breeds in Arid scrub, farmlands, parks, golf courses, desert, savannah, cultivated lands, and riparian woodland, and is usually found near water (Sutton 1967b, Oberholser 1974c).There are many recognized subspecies that could one day end up as separate species and it is recommended reading Clements et al. (2017) to find out all the various forms of this species. In this account, the focus will be on the more widespread North American subspecies. In North America, there are 2 subspecies of Vermilion Flycatcher (Clements et al. 2017). The first subspecies of Vermilion Flycatcher is (Pyrocephalus rubinus flammeus) which is a localized subspecies found in the lowlands of south-central and southeastern California (Crouch 1959). Current breeding locations in California include San Bernardino, Riverside, San Diego, Los Angeles, Santa Barbara, and Ventura counties, north to Kern County (Rosenberg et al. 1991, Small 1994, Myers 2008). This subspecies also breeds in southern Nevada, where it is locally common, and is generally found north to 37°N (Ellison et al. 2009), with one nesting record north near Reno (Ryser 1985). The range of the Vermilion Flycatcher extends up into the extreme southwestern corner of Utah where it is rare (Behle et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimates of Avian Mortality Attributed to Vehicle Collisions in Canada
    Copyright © 2013 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance. Bishop, C. A., and J. M. Brogan. 2013. Estimates of avian mortality attributed to vehicle collisions in Canada. Avian Conservation and Ecology 8(2): 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ACE-00604-080202 Research Paper, part of a Special Feature on Quantifying Human-related Mortality of Birds in Canada Estimates of Avian Mortality Attributed to Vehicle Collisions in Canada Estimation de la mortalité aviaire attribuable aux collisions automobiles au Canada Christine A. Bishop 1 and Jason M. Brogan 2 ABSTRACT. Although mortality of birds from collisions with vehicles is estimated to be in the millions in the USA, Europe, and the UK, to date, no estimates exist for Canada. To address this, we calculated an estimate of annual avian mortality attributed to vehicular collisions during the breeding and fledging season, in Canadian ecozones, by applying North American literature values for avian mortality to Canadian road networks. Because owls are particularly susceptible to collisions with vehicles, we also estimated the number of roadkilled Barn owls (Tyto alba) in its last remaining range within Canada. (This species is on the IUCN red list and is also listed federally as threatened; Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada 2010, International Union for the Conservation of Nature 2012). Through seven Canadian studies in existence, 80 species and 2,834 specimens have been found dead on roads representing species from 14 orders of birds. On Canadian 1 and 2-lane paved roads outside of major urban centers, the unadjusted number of bird mortalities/yr during an estimated 4-mo (122-d) breeding and fledging season for most birds in Canada was 4,650,137 on roads traversing through deciduous, coniferous, cropland, wetlands and nonagricultural landscapes with less than 10% treed area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brown-Headed Cowbird: a Model Species for Testing Novel Research 9 Questions in Animal Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior
    The Brown-Headed Cowbird: A Model Species for Testing Novel Research 9 Questions in Animal Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior Brian D. Peer, James W. Rivers, Loren Merrill, Scott K. Robinson, and Stephen I. Rothstein Abstract Although the brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater) is the most intensively studied brood parasite in the world, much of the research on cowbirds has focused on the negative effects of parasitism. Here, we argue that negative attitudes toward the cowbird have overshadowed opportunities this species provides for advancing our understanding of social behavior, physiology, evolution, and ecology and conservation of birds. Cowbirds are widely distributed, amenable to captive study, and easy to study in areas where they are abundant. Cowbird nestlings must communicate to unrelated host parents, but unlike some parasitic nestlings, they have no specialized adaptations for doing so. In some areas they often share nests with relatives, which may influence the degree of virulence host experience. The generalist strategy of the cowbird can be used to answer questions about the impact of high reproductive output on female cowbirds, maternal allocation of resources into eggs, and the consequences of exposure to a range of pathogens while visiting host nests. Cowbirds and their hosts provide a contrast to cuckoo-host systems because they are at an earlier stage of B. D. Peer (*) Department of Biological Sciences, Western Illinois University, Moline, IL, USA e-mail: [email protected] J. W. Rivers Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA L. Merrill Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL, USA S.
    [Show full text]