DOCSLIB.ORG

UNT-0020-0177.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TxD Y200.6 J826 95/09 i1OCUMEN!TSW0 :VTRV 95-28JAN0. i9; Texas Youth Commission September 1995, Fall Issue 4900 N. Lamar, Austin, TX 78765 News and Information from throughout the Agency Lindgren resigns; Briscoe named acting de puty director In this issue: ay Lindgren, Deputy Executive Direc- Lindgren's duties in Rhode Island will tor of the Youth Ccommission since include responsibility for youth correction Marlin 'Reception January 15, 1988, as resigned to ac- juvenile probation, pretrial detention, men- cept the position of Director of the Rhode tal health services for children, and child Center' opens Island Department of Children, Youth and protective services. His appointment was Story on page 7. Families, effective August 15. made by Rhode Island Governor Lincoln Executive Director Steve Robinson ap- Almond. pointed Judy Briscoe, TYC's Director of "It has been an honor to serve on what Outstanding 1995 Delinquency Prevention, as acting deputy I am certain is the best juvenile corrections director. Employees Honored (rontinuedd o"rpage ) Stories and photospages 11-16. IN THIS ISSUE Legislation.................................. 3 Annual Workshop.........................11 Construction Contract .................. 15 RIF Policy......................................23 New Administrators.................23 m SanctionSancion Unit......25nit.................................2 Former TYC Board Member Lary York, center was honored when the TYC halfway house in Corpus Christi was renamed York House. Also pictured are current Board Chairman Gary D. Project RIO....................................26 Compton ofAmarillo, left, and State Senator John Montford ofLubbock; keynote speaker SECTIONS Halfway house renamed to Around TYC ............................... 3 honor former Board Member Volunteers ............. 18 e Corpus Christi halfway house, formerly called Nueces House for the county in Youth g ......................... 20 Which it is located, was renamed "York House" on May 18, 1995, in honor of former Human Resources.................22 TYCBoard Member Larry York of Austin. Cultural Events......................... 24 Ceremonies were held to mark the occasion, during which Senator John Montford Programs ...................................... 25 of Lubbock made the keynote remarks. (continued on page 8) i OF NT DEP. L ~rUA'ES 76203 2 JOURNAL 2 TYCTVC JOURNAL The former state ide reception center in Brownwood is beir ng renovated to house a new sanction unit for youth who violate parole. The 128-bed program will be a 60- From the day program. We have had you th in two conserva- Executive tion camps this summier as pilot programs, the CT-11, an80-foot minesweeper, and the Gulf Coast Trades Ceriter camp. Kids live in Director tents with wood floo rs at the Gulf Coast camp. Both require ve ry hard work and our youth have responded very well, so we will be continuing these t two programs. TfC has been Our specialized'g ang intervention' pro- gram at Gainesville State School is being 'changing course' continued, with emphasis on controlling for several months... gang activity, while c ontinuing to encour- age and assist youth to give up their gang Now we've "Come About!" Steve Robinson, Executive Director affiliations. For the last year, the Youth Commis- I am extremely optimistic about our new I do understand that the "Sixteen-Hour programs to place youth in jobs: through sion has been 'changing course' in Day" challenges staff a lot more, but I've Project RIO (see article on page 26) in co- the way we provide services to youth- also heard positive comments about shifts operation with the Texas Workforce Com- ful offenders. And numerous other "moving more quickly." mission; and through a construction skills changes are in the works. Most of those 16 hours are scheduled pre-apprenticeship pr gram at Giddings, in I believe we are currently at the point with meals, chores, exercise, academic cooperation with Ho me Builders Institute, where we can say we've "Come About!" classes, counseling and resocialization which was kicked off September 1, 1995. We are rapidly opening new programs, re- "groups." Additionally, youth will be ex- The first 15 youth will receive 750 hours structuring old programs, and going about pected to do community service projects of training and 90 percent will be placed in the job of putting a new system into place on campus, as well as in the community career-type employee nt. The Institute will which is capable of responding to the in- (under strict supervision), and some youth place a full-time job p lacement coordinator ternal needs of the agency and the external will be doing paid jobs on campus. Half- at Giddings. I welco me this excellent op- needs of the public. way house residents are also continuing portunity to develop this alliance with the As we go to press, we are beginning to be heavily involved in volunteer work community. the task of reorganizing our administration. in their communities, and many will hold We are restructuringng our parole services, Our new "reception center" is now fully down paying jobs in the community. and we're downsizin g staff as we step up operational at Marlin - with all youth com- Youth earning money for jobs will be contracting with juve nile probation depart- mitted to TYC (except for those from the required to pay restitu- tion, if the court ments for parole ser vices. We expect su- South Region) being transported to that has ordered it, and court- g pervision ofparolees, whetherby TYC Com- location by the committing counties. ordered child support munity Corrections Officers or by con- The Marlin program is being called the Our "look" has also tracted county probate ion officers, to be far "assessment and orientation" center, to re- 'Come About.' more intense than in the past. flect on the longer length of stay at the first Standardized clothing and In short, we have "Come About" after TYC placement before a permanent place- state-issued footwear is - carefully considering g how to go about ment is determined. Youth begin their ori- standard dress in insti- - X . "Changing Course." entation into the Youth Commission dur- tutions, no jewelry Asalways, Iwelco me your thoughts and ing a 60-day stay, and academic classes are (other than religious) is comments as we tu rn our attention to in- being conducted. permitted, and standard creasing our emp hasis on security, con- One of our most important new goals in haircuts are given on ar- trol and public safety. W EVERY program is to require kids to partici- rival. pate in structured activity during every Recreational televi- waking hour - what we're calling "the Six- sion is permitted only as teen-Hour Day." Instead of "free time" to a special privilege, and . watch TV, play games, and visit, youth are then onlyvat limited times -i now being required to focus on a specific We have begun sev- activity, such as reading, watching educa- eral new, specialized pro- tional videos, doing homework, or writing grams. letters. TYC JOURNAL 3 lYC JOURNAL 3 Legislation enacted Delinquent mentally retarded youth by 74th Legislature now come to juvenile correction system there was a prohibition on A call for juvenile justice re- Previously form in Texas by the Gover- flected in the omnibus juvenile jus- TYC from accepting a mentally retarded major change in philosophy is re- nor and legislative leaders tice law passed by the 74th Legis- youth, but that law was repealed. has resulted in many new lature: Mentally retarded youth are now Since the law went into effect May 31, laws which will impact the being committedto TYC, as ofMay 31, 1995. the agency has contracted with a private Texas Youth Commission. Prior law provided that a child in juve- provider to provide residential treatment Numerous bills were in- nile court who was believed to be mentally for 16 mentally retarded youth who are com- troduced during the 74th Legislature to retarded was first dealt with by TXMHIMR mitted to TYC. At least 24 youth commit- change the juvenile sentencing statute. and, only if released by that agency, would ted prior to that date, and already in TYC Many offenses have been added to the de- juvenile proceedings be resumed. placement, have been identified as eligible. terminate sentencing provisions, coupling them with statutory minimum length-of- stay requirements for administrative parole eligibility. The results were incorporated into an omnibus juvenile justice bill, House Bill 327. The major change included the addi- tion of "punishment" into the agency's purpose, and emphasizes the accountabil- AROUN D TYC ity and responsibility of both the parent and the child for the child's conduct. A parent, managing or possessory conservator of a child will be required to attend transfer, adjudication, disposition $250 million appropriated for next biennium and release hearings, and employers are rity fence. prohibited from firing employees who are Biennial operating funds of $250 The Jefferson County required to attend hearings. million have been appropriated for State School, Beaumont (scheduled The list of offenses for which a juve- the Texas Youth Commission for to open in August), would be expanded with the addition of nile may be given a specific sentence of fiscal years 1996 and 1997, following work three 48-bed dormitories as well as comple- commitment to TYC was expanded to in- by Legislative budget conferees. tion of the physical education/vocation clude indecency with a child, sexual as- An additional $55.5 million was appro- priated for construction, including conver- building. sault, aggravated assault; injury to a child, Also to be constructed are 48-bed elderly individual or disabled individual; sion of several adult facilities, and construc- dorms at both felony deadly conduct involving discharg- tion and renovation of TYC facilities. Brownwood and Giddings, and two 48-bed dorms at Crockett. Other ing a firearm; a criminal attempt to commit The funds will provide for a residential average daily population of 2,760 in FY 1996 construction includes perimeter fences at six of the offenses, criminal solicitation, Crockett and Corsicana, and a new admin- criminal solicitation of a minor; certain of- and 3,675 in FY 1997.
Recommended publications
  • SAP Crystal Reports

    SAP Crystal Reports

    Texas PK-16 Public Education Information Resource Texas Public Prekindergarten Programs and Enrollment Ages 3 and 4 Public Prekindergarten Enrollment for 2015-16 School Year Public Prekindergarten Enrollment by Student Instruction Type and ADA Eligibility for 2015-16 School Year 220,640 190,848 (86%) 88,295 (40%) 2015-16 Student Total Students Enrolled Economically Limited English Total Enrolled ADA Eligible Not Eligible for ADA Instruction Ages 3 and 4 Disadvantaged Proficiency Type Students Percent Students Percent Students Percent Enrolled Enrolled Enrolled Enrolled Enrolled Enrolled 8,594 (4%) 6,611 (3%) 5,471 (2%) Age 3 Full-day 12,206 47% 11,616 47% 590 50% Special Education Military Children Homeless Half-day 13,573 53% 12,974 53% 599 50% Total 25,779 100% 24,590 100% 1,189 100% Age 4 Full-day 103,380 53% 96,791 53% 6,589 60% 1,695 (0.8%) 109,816 (50%) 110,824 (50%) Half-day 91,481 47% 87,071 47% 4,410 40% In Foster Care Females Males Total 194,861 100% 183,862 100% 10,999 100% Total Total 220,640 100% 208,452 100% 12,188 100% Public Prekindergarten Enrollment by Ethnicity for 2015-16 School Year Districts Providing Public Districts Providing Public Prekindergarten Prekindergarten for 2015-16 School Year for 2015-16 School Year by Instruction Type 64% 13% Hispanic/Latino Districts 30% White Not Full & Providing Half-day 40% Black or African PK Full-Day American Only Asian Two or more races Districts American Indian or Providing 15% 15% Alaska Nat Half-Day PK Native Hawaiian/Other Only Percentage of Students Enrolled Students of
  • Texas Youth Commission (TYC) and Transferred All Functions, Duties and Responsibilities of These Former Agencies to TJJD

    Texas Youth Commission (TYC) and Transferred All Functions, Duties and Responsibilities of These Former Agencies to TJJD

    Comprehensive Report Youth Reentry and Reintegration December 1, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................................... 1 ASSESSMENTS ............................................................................................................................ 1 PROGRAMS ................................................................................................................................ 2 NETWORK OF TRANSITION PROGRAMS .................................................................................... 5 IDENTIFICATION OF LOCAL PROVIDERS AND TRANSITIONAL SERVICES .................................... 7 Children’s Aftercare Reentry Experience (CARE) ................................................................ 9 Gang Intervention Treatment: Reentry Development for Youth (GitRedy) ....................... 9 SHARING OF INFORMATION .................................................................................................... 10 OUTCOMES ................................................................................................................................. 10 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................ 14 APPENDICES ..............................................................................................................................
  • The Texas Youth Commission

    The Texas Youth Commission

    JOINT SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE TEXAS YOUTH COMMISSION PRELIMINARY REPORT OF INITIAL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A REPORT TO THE LT. GOVERNOR AND THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE 80TH TEXAS LEGISLATURE JOHN WHITMIRE JERRY MADDEN SENATE CO-CHAIRMAN HOUSE CO-CHAIRMAN Joint Select Committee on the Operation and Management of the Texas Youth Commission Preliminary Report of Initial Findings and Recommendations Table of Contents I. Executive Summary II. Preliminary Report III. Proclamation IV. Attachment One - Recommended Action Plan by Committee V. Attachment Two - Statistical Breakdown by TDCJ-OIG VI. Attachment Three - Filed Legislation VII. Attachment Four - State Auditor's Report 07-022 VIII. Attachment Five - McLennan County State Juvenile Correctional Facility - Case File Review EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background The Texas Youth Commission (TYC) is the state agency responsible for the care, custody and rehabilitation of the juvenile offenders who have been committed by the court. The ages of youth committed to TYC ranges from 10 to 17. The TYC can maintain custody of the youth until the age of twenty-one (21). Allegations of mistreatment, disturbances and abuse began to surface and the TYC came under federal scrutiny due to the riot at the Evins Regional Juvenile Center in Edinburg, Texas. The U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, began an investigation at the Evins facility in September 2006 and issued their report on March 15, 2007, stating "certain conditions at Evins violate the constitutional rights of the youth". The Senate Criminal Justice Committee, the House Corrections Committee and the Juvenile Justice and Family Issues Committee conducted separate public hearings allowing staff, youth, family members, child advocacy groups, the ACLU and other concerned citizens to be heard.
  • Texas Education Agency Overview

    Texas Education Agency Overview

    Texas Education Agency Overview 100 - Office of the Commissioner; Senior Policy Advisor The Commissioner's Office provides leadership to schools, manages the Texas Education Agency (TEA), and provides coordination with the state legislature and other branches of state government as well as the U. S. Department of Education. SBOE activities and rules, commissioner rules and regulations, commissioner hearing decisions, coordinates with state legislature, Commissioner’s Correspondence and Complaints Management. Number of FTEs: 6 Correspondence Management Function Description: This function serves to oversee, coordinate, and conduct activities associated with managing and responding to correspondence received by members of the public, local education agencies (LEAs), legislature, and other state agencies. This function operates under the authority of Agency OP 03-01, for which the Office of the Commissioner is the Primary Office of Responsibility (OPR). This function serves as a review and distribution center for correspondence assigned to other offices in coordination with Complaints Management and the Public Information Coordination Office. Complaints Management Function Description: This function serves to oversee, coordinate, and conduct activities associated with managing and responding to complaints received by members of the public. Through various activities, this function ensures that the operations of the Agency’s complaint system is compliant with applicable regulations and policy and effectively meets identified needs of the Agency. This function operates under the authority of Agency OP 04-01, for which the Office of the Commissioner is the Primary Office of Responsibility (OPR). This function mainly serves as a review and distribution center for complaints assigned to other offices in coordination with Correspondence Management and the Public Information Coordination Office.
  • Jerry Patterson, Commissioner Texas General Land Office General Land Office Texas STATE AGENCY PROPERTY RECOMMENDED TRANSACTIONS

    Jerry Patterson, Commissioner Texas General Land Office General Land Office Texas STATE AGENCY PROPERTY RECOMMENDED TRANSACTIONS

    STATE AGENCY PROPERTY RECOMMENDED TRANSACTIONS Report to the Governor October 2009 Jerry Patterson, Commissioner Texas General Land Office General Land Office Texas STATE AGENCY PROPERTY RECOMMENDED TRANSACTIONS REPORT TO THE GOVERNOR OCTOBER 2009 TEXAS GENERAL LAND OFFICE JERRY PATTERSON, COMMISSIONER INTRODUCTION SB 1262 Summary Texas Natural Resources Code, Chapter 31, Subchapter E, [Senate Bill 1262, 74th Texas Legislature, 1995] amended two years of previous law related to the reporting and disposition of state agency land. The amendments established a more streamlined process for disposing of unused or underused agency land by defining a reporting and review sequence between the Land Commissioner and the Governor. Under this process, the Asset Management Division of the General Land Office provides the Governor with a list of state agency properties that have been identified as unused or underused and a set of recommended real estate transactions. The Governor has 90 days to approve or disapprove the recommendations, after which time the Land Commissioner is authorized to conduct the approved transactions. The statute freezes the ability of land-owning state agencies to change the use or dispose of properties that have recommended transactions, from the time the list is provided to the Governor to a date two years after the recommendation is approved by the Governor. Agencies have the opportunity to submit to the Governor development plans for the future use of the property within 60 days of the listing date, for the purpose of providing information on which to base a decision regarding the recommendations. The General Land Office may deduct expenses from transaction proceeds.
  • Criminal Justice Uniform Cost Report (January 2011)

    Criminal Justice Uniform Cost Report (January 2011)

    Criminal Justice Uniform Cost Report Fiscal Years 2008 – 2010 SUBMITTED TO THE 82ND TEXAS LEGISLATURE JANUARY 2011 LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF CRIMINAL JUSTICE UNIFORM COST REPORT FISCAL YEARS 2008–2010 LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD JANUARY 2011 COVER PHOTO COURTESY OF HOUSE PHOTOGRAPHY CRIMINAL JUSTICE DATA ANALYSIS TEAM Michele Connolly, Manager Jamie Gardner, Analyst Adriana Marin, Analyst Laurie Molina, Analyst Ed Sinclair, Analyst PUBLIC SAFETY AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE TEAM John Newton, Manager Angela Isaack, Analyst David Repp, Analyst Melissa Wurzer, Analyst CRIMINAL JUSTICE UNIFORM COST REpORT FISCAL YEARS 2008-2010 January 2011 One responsibility of the Criminal Justice Data Analysis Team of the Legislative Budget Board is to calculate cost per day information for various adult and juvenile correctional populations for use in funding determinations and to provide a basis of comparison between correctional programs and previously published cost figures. This report summarizes uniform cost information for programs, services, and facilities operated or contracted by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), the Texas Youth Commission (TYC), and the Texas Juvenile Probation Commission (JPC). The appendices detail the methodology used for data collection and cost per day calculations, provide an overview of each agency's operations and programs, and provide comparisons to other cost per Director Legislative Budget Board ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The LBB staff would like to thank the adult and juvenile criminal justice agencies and their staff
  • Juveniles in the Adult Criminal Justice System in Texas

    Juveniles in the Adult Criminal Justice System in Texas

    JuvenilesJuveniles inin thethe AdultAdult CriminalCriminal JusticeJustice SystemSystem inin TexasTexas by Michele Deitch Special Project Report Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs The University of Texas at Austin Juveniles in the Adult Criminal Justice System in Texas By Project Director Michele Deitch, J.D., M.Sc., Senior Lecturer LBJ School of Public Affairs Student Participants Emily Ling, LBJ School of Public Affairs Emma Quintero, University of Texas School of Law Suggested citation for this report: Michele Deitch (2011). Juveniles in the Adult Criminal Justice System in Texas, Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin, LBJ School of Public Affairs A Special Project Report from the Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs The University of Texas at Austin Applied Research in Juvenile and Criminal Justice—Fall Semester 2010 March 2011 © 2011 by The University of Texas at Austin All rights reserved. Cover design by Doug Marshall, LBJ School Communications Office Cover photo by Steve Liss/The AmericanPoverty.org Campaign TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables and Figures v Acknowledgements vii Executive Summary x Part I: Introduction 1 A. Purpose of Report 1 B. Methodology 2 C. Structure of Report 2 Part II: Overview 3 A. Historical Background 3 B. Sentencing and Transfer Options for Serious Juvenile Offenders Under Texas Law 4 C. Problems with Confining Juveniles in Adult Prisons and Jails 6 Part III: Findings 9 A. Numbers of adult certification cases vs. juvenile determinate sentencing 9 B. Characteristics of certified and determinate sentence populations 10 (1) Demographics 10 Age 10 Gender 11 Ethnicity 12 County of Conviction 12 (2) Criminal Offense 13 (3) Criminal History 16 Prior Referrals to Juvenile Court 17 Prior Referrals to Juvenile Court for Violent Offenses 17 Prior TYC Commitments 18 C.
  • Senate Committee on Criminal Justice Interim Report To

    Senate Committee on Criminal Justice Interim Report To

    Senate Criminal Justice Committee Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 4 Interim Charge One ........................................................................................................ 13 Interim Charge Two ...................................................................................................... 20 Interim Charge Three..................................................................................................... 27 Interim Charge Four ...................................................................................................... 34 Interim Charge Five ....................................................................................................... 48 Interim Charge Six ......................................................................................................... 53 Interim Charge Seven ..................................................................................................... 69 Interim Charge Eight ..................................................................................................... 73 Interim Charge Nine ....................................................................................................... 81 Interim Charge Ten ........................................................................................................ 96 Interim Charge Eleven ..................................................................................................
  • Representing the Juvenile Delinquent: Reform, Social Science, and Teenage Troubles in Postwar Texas

    Representing the Juvenile Delinquent: Reform, Social Science, and Teenage Troubles in Postwar Texas

    Texas A&M University-San Antonio Digital Commons @ Texas A&M University-San Antonio History Faculty Publications College of Arts and Sciences 2004 Representing the Juvenile Delinquent: Reform, Social Science, and Teenage Troubles in Postwar Texas William S. Bush Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.tamusa.edu/hist_faculty Part of the American Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Copyright by William Sebastian Bush 2004 The Dissertation Committee for William Sebastian Bush Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Representing the Juvenile Delinquent: Reform, Social Science, and Teenage Troubles in Postwar Texas Committee: Mark C. Smith, Supervisor Janet Davis Julia Mickenberg King Davis Sheldon Ekland-Olson Representing the Juvenile Delinquent: Reform, Social Science, and Teenage Troubles in Postwar Texas by William Sebastian Bush, B.A., M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2004 Dedication For Mary and Alexander Acknowledgements Researching and writing a dissertation tests the emotions as well as the intellect. The two become so closely intertwined that scholarly advice invariably doubles as a salve for personal anxieties. Whether they knew it or not, practically everyone mentioned below bolstered my ever-flagging confidence even as they talked out ideas or problems that seemed bound within the more detached constraints of a dissertation project. Others just listened patiently to barely coherent thesis ideas, anxious brainstorming outbursts, and the usual angry tirades against academia.
  • Chapter 10. Texas Dispositional Alternatives Danny Pirtile Introduction Juvenile Judges and District Attorneys Play an Important

    Chapter 10. Texas Dispositional Alternatives Danny Pirtile Introduction Juvenile Judges and District Attorneys Play an Important

    Chapter 10. Texas Dispositional Alternatives Danny Pirtile Introduction Juvenile judges and district attorneys play an important role in determining appropriate and often-necessary sanctions for those youth deemed delinquent and incorrigible. In the late 1980s, there was a transitional period for the juvenile justice system, where state legislatures began to institute policies aimed at violent, serious, and chronic juvenile offenders (Snyder & Sickmund, 1995; TJPC, 2003). Texas was not immune to the dramatic policy shifts being initiated during the late 1980s and early 1990s that was due to an overwhelming increase in juvenile crime and public fear of habitual and violent youthful offenders. Cox, Conrad, Allen and Hanser (2007) present a plethora of programs and dispositional choices available to juvenile justice officials. This chapter presents dispositional programs available to Texas juvenile officials and the milieu of these dispositions. Texas lawmakers developed policies that sought to decrease the non-adversarial nature of the juvenile court and replace them with increased procedural similarities to the adult criminal justice system. These legislative changes resulted in the creation of laws that significantly altered dispositions or adjudicatory outcomes in the juvenile justice system. Juvenile judges and prosecutors received increased authority and were provided with a wide range of dispositional alternatives which included placing a youth on probation to transferring the case to the adult system. Thus, the new goal was to focus more on providing tougher, offense based sanctions, while still retaining some of the safeguards provided in the juvenile justice system, which ultimately rely on the parens patriae doctrine of rehabilitation and focus on the best interests of the child.
  • Understanding and Addressing Youth Violence in the Texas Juvenile Justice Department

    Understanding and Addressing Youth Violence in the Texas Juvenile Justice Department

    UNDERSTANDING AND ADDRESSING YOUTH VIOLENCE IN THE TEXAS JUVENILE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT Report to the Office of the Independent Ombudsman by Michele Deitch, J.D., M.Sc. Amy Madore Kate Vickery Alycia Welch SPECIAL PROJECT REPORT Understanding and Addressing Youth Violence in the Texas Juvenile Justice Department Report to the Office of the Independent Ombudsman by Project Director Michele Deitch, J.D., M.Sc. Senior Lecturer, LBJ School of Public Affairs LBJ School Student Participants Amy Madore Kate Vickery Alycia Welch Special Project Report Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs The University of Texas at Austin May 2013 ISBN: 978-89940-924-5 © 2013 by the University of Texas at Austin All rights reserved. Table of Contents Acknowledgements vii Executive Summmary ix List of Findings xix List of Tables and Figures xxv Chapter I: Introduction 1 A. Origins of the Report 1 B. Purpose of the Report 2 C. Methodology 2 D. Structure of the Report 4 Chapter II: Background 7 A. TYC Crisis of 2007 7 B. Reform Efforts Since 2007 8 (1) Senate Bill 103 8 (2) Reduction in Population and Closure of Facilities 9 (3) Shift Towards Treatment-Oriented Approach 10 C. Major Operational Changes and Challenges at TYC 11 (1) Use of Force and Use of Pepper Spray 11 (2) Staffing Shortages 11 (3) Sexual Assault Allegations 12 D. Creation of Texas Juvenile Justice Department (TJJD) 12 E. Recent Reports about Violence in TJJD 13 v Understanding and Addressing Youth Violence in the Texas Juvenile Justice Department Chapter III: A Profile of Violence in TJJD’s Secure Facilities 15 A.
  • Workers' Compensation Losses � 12

    Workers' Compensation Losses 12

    Texas Workers' Compensation Commission State Risk Management DATE DUE Interim Report April 1994 State Risk Management Interim Report Contents State Risk Management- Summary 1 Assistance to State Agencies 2 Sununary of Losses 4 Issues for Consideration 5 Appendix A - Texas State Agencies Participating in the State Risk Management Program 8 Appendix B - Analyses of Losses by Category of Loss 12 Workers' Compensation Losses 12 Liability Losses 15 Property Losses 18 Unemployment Compensation Losses 19 Appendix C - Texas Workers' Compensation Unit Statistical Report Summary 21 State Risk Management Brief Description Division Location and Function The State Risk Management Division works The State Risk Management Division is located with certain state agencies to identify workers' in the Texas Workers' Compensation Commission. compensation, property and liability risks' to reduce The Division's functions and duties are independent losses. The risk management process' saves the state and separate from all other functions and processes money by protecting state resources. These resources performed by the Commission to regulate the work- include 149,862 state employees, $2.5 billion in ers' compensation system in Texas. capital investments in buildings and $1.6 billion in fixed assets. Basic Duties and Responsibilities The Division collects information on state agency management of workers' compensation, prop- The Division is created by the Texas Workers' erty and liability risks. The Division tracks informa- Compensation Act, Chapter 412 of the Texas Labor tion on claims brought against the state, losses paid, Code Annotated. The Division Director serves as the and methods to reduce risks and losses. 'State Risk Manager' to accomplish the following: The Division reviews state agency risk man- • Identify and evaluate the workers' compensa- agement programs.