Exemplarity and Its Limits in the Hagiographical Corpus of Thomas of Cantimpré
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Exemplarity and its Limits in the Hagiographical Corpus of Thomas of Cantimpré The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Smith, Rachel. 2012. Exemplarity and its Limits in the Hagiographical Corpus of Thomas of Cantimpré. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:9385642 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA © Rachel Smith 2012 Prof. Amy Hollywood Rachel Smith Exemplarity and its Limits in Thomas of Cantimpré’s Hagiographical Corpus Abstract This dissertation examines the hagiographical corpus of the Dominican preacher Thomas of Cantimpré (c. 1201–1270), a critical early respondent to the burgeoning women’s religious movement in the Southern Low Countries. Writing at a time when both lay and religious spirituality were being radically refigured in light of new organizational structures and devotional practices, Thomas’s hagiographical corpus reflects the diversity of vocational possibilities available for women and men in this period at a time of great religious experimentation and innovation. Using historical, literary, and theological methods, the dissertation examines the ways in which Thomas’s vitae struggle with the question of how lay and religious, male and female readers might, in Thomas’s words, “take up” the different kinds of figures Thomas offers as models for practice and objects of devotion. Each of the vitae offer unique solutions to this question even as they represent different sorts of persons as exemplary. An important assumption governing the dissertation is that hagiography is a vital part of the spiritual and theological tradition of Christianity. Thomas’s vitae, I argue, attempt to articulate a theology of exemplarity in order to address the issue of what constitutes sanctity, who can become a saint, and by what means sanctity is attained. For Thomas, exemplarity is animated by theological notions of incarnation and scriptural revelation. Christ, as manifest in his life and in the words of scripture, is the great exemplum for embodied lives. For each of Thomas’s saints, Christ is both the singular figure who saves and the one in whom the saint participates, raising the question of how iii the individual human being embodies and exemplifies Christ’s singularity. Thomas’s Lives will be shown, in the course of their narratives, to illumine the tension between the singularity of Christ and its repetition in the saintly figures represented in the vitae and the readers of those vitae. Exploration of this tension reveals great richness in Thomas’s works, showing that Thomas’s narrative voice often speaks doubly within a single vita, thematizing the limits and possibilities of exemplarity and its hagiographical representation. iv Table of Contents Acknowledgements vii Chapter One Introduction I. Example and Incarnation 1 II. Thomas of Cantimpré: A Summary of his Life and Literary Activity 4 III. The Economic and Pastoral Context of Thomas’s Ministry 26 IV. The Medieval Exemplum 47 Chapter Two Wondrous Horror and the Didactic Exemplar I. Exemplary Unlikeness in the Vita Christinae Mirabilis 58 II. Dissimilar Similarities 72 III. Dissimilar Similarity and Sanctity 74 IV. Miracle as Mirror: Two readings of Dissimilar Image 90 V. Modeling the Impossible: Exemplarity, Astonishment and the Singular 104 VI. Gendering Particularity: A Comparison with The Life of Abbot John of Cantimpré 108 VII. Conclusion 121 Chapter Three A Question of Proof: Augustine and the Reading of Hagiography I. Introduction: Example, Relic, Text 126 II. Audience and Proof 138 III. The Crisis of Credulity in the Prologue to the Life of Lutgard of Aywières 141 v IV. Augustine’s De Doctrina Christiana 151 V. Desire, Interpretation, and Proof 169 VI. Conclusion 179 Chapter Four Language, Literacy, and the Saintly Body I. Introduction 181 II. Litteratus-illiteratus and the topos of the illiterate holy woman in the Middle Ages 191 III. “That what we read may be performed in us”: Reading in a Monastic Milieu 200 IV. William of Saint-Thierry and the Three States of Prayer 210 V. Plotting the VLA: Thomas of Cantimpré and the Monastic Model of Reading 220 VI. Illiteracy in the VLA 226 VII. Literacy in the VLA 235 VIII. Conclusion 241 Chapter Five The Uses of Astonishment: Apophasis, Exemplarity, and the Writing of Mystical Hagiography I. From Inexpressibility to Ineffability: The Wondrous and the Apophatic in the Life of Lutgard of Aywières 244 II. Thomas and the Male Search for Visionary Experience 268 III. Apophasis and Exemplarity 273 IV. Conclusion 279 Bibliography 282 vi Acknowledgements A number of people deserve special acknowledgement for assistance provided during the research and writing of this dissertation. Amy Hollywood offered expert advising, inexhaustible encouragement, and generous editorial help throughout the long process. Nicholas Watson read many early drafts and provided inspiring conversation throughout my time at Harvard. Kevin Madigan’s unflagging support, kindness, and intelligence were essential at every step of my doctoral work. Renata Kalnin’s research assistance was invaluable for this project. Thanks also to Fr. Maximos, Beverley Kienzle, Mark Jordan, Stephanie Paulsell, Natalie Polzer, Abbott Conway, and Kathleen Skerrett for being such wonderful teachers and readers of the pre-modern world. The community of friends and scholars at Harvard has been a great joy during my years in Cambridge. Thanks especially to Amelia Perkins, Natasha Bershadsky, Tamsin Jones, Charles Stang, Sarabinh Levy-Brightman, Mara Willard, Niki Clements, Maria Aguilar, Philip Francis, Jen De La Guardia, Bob Davis, Chip Lockwood, Mikael Haxby, Josh Schapiro, Bronwyn Roantree, Piotr Malysz, Margaret Healy-Varley, Brenna Moore, Mark McInroy, and to friends at home, Krista Muir, Jonathan Hayes, Jane Motz-Hayes, Heidi Willms, Sarah Fulford and Stephen Marche. My family—Sheila and Glen, Duff, Peter and Jen, and Sondra, grandma Dorothy and grandpa Arthur, Brenda and Malcolm—gave love, interest, and good humor throughout this process. Brett and Georgia made everything worthwhile. vii Introduction Incarnation and Example What does it mean to be a saint? Who can become one? By what means is sanctity attained? These questions were central to laypersons and religious leaders in the thirteenth-century Southern Low Countries who lived at a time of great religious innovation and experimentation. This dissertation will examine the ways in which key questions about the holy life—what constitutes it, how it should be represented, and how different audiences might act in light of the example of the saints—are addressed in the hagiographical corpus of the thirteenth-century Augustinian canon-turned-Dominican, Thomas of Cantimpré (c. 1200-c.1270). Thomas’s vitae, I argue, attempt to articulate a theology of exemplarity as an answer. Exemplarity is a quality of “being fit to serve as a model or pattern for imitation” or a “warning about what not to do.”1 For Thomas, exemplarity is animated by theological notions of incarnation and scriptural revelation. Christ, as manifest in his life and in the words of scripture, is the great exemplum for embodied lives. For each of Thomas’s saints, Christ is both the singular figure who saves and the one in whom the saint participates, raising the question of how the individual human being embodies and exemplifies Christ’s singularity. Thomas’s Lives will be shown, in the course of their narratives, to illumine the tension between the singularity of Christ and its repetition in the saintly figures represented in the vitae and in the readers of those vitae. Exploration of this tension reveals great richness in Thomas’s works, showing how Thomas’s narrative voice often speaks doubly within a single vita, 1 OED, vol. 5, p. 525, “exemplarity.” 1 thematizing the limits and possibilities of exemplarity and its representation within a hagiography. In Chapter two, I consider this tension as Thomas represents the body of Christina the Astonishing, whose imitation of Christ is so literal it encroaches on the dogmatically declared singularity of Christ, thereby making her a monstrous horror to spectators who are left uncertain about how to respond—an uncertainty that the narrative dramatizes and probes. In Chapter three, I again explore the problem of credibility, here asking how Thomas understands the status of hagiographical texts that portray the saint so assimilated to God that she becomes impossible to believe, even as her incredible deeds prove her sanctity. As a solution to this rhetorical conundrum, I argue that Thomas, employing a hermeneutical strategy derived from Augustine’s De Doctrina Christiana, asks readers to approach Lutgard’s vita as they would scriptural revelation. In Chapter four, I examine the devotional mode of reading the saint’s life articulated by Thomas as the means by which the reader might become the saint who has, already, become scripture. In Chapter five, I argue that Thomas treats his writing of the life of an ecstatic saint as a means of enabling his own ecstatic encounter with God. In each chapter, I will show the ways in which Thomas problematizes acts of mimesis, thematizing the limits and possibilities of the saint’s, reader’s, and author’s capacity to imitate the divine life, whether in word or deed. Thomas’s theology does not proceed by way of abstract questions and answers but adapts and reconstitutes older theological traditions of Augustine, Cassian, Bernard of Clairvaux, and William of Saint-Thierry within the particular historical narratives of contemporary lives. The saintly example embodies and recapitulates Christ’s example. The vitae, in turn, solicit the imitation (or, in the case of the exemplar-as-warning, a 2 change of behavior) of readers who are asked to respond by means of not only an intellectual assent but also an affective and bodily participation in the saint’s story.