Arxiv:0902.1137V1 [Astro-Ph.GA] 6 Feb 2009 02Frareview)

The Origin and Shaping of Planetary Nebulae: Putting the Binary Hypothesis to the Test Orsola De Marco Astronomy Department, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024 [email protected] ABSTRACT Planetary nebulae (PNe) are circumstellar gas ejected during an intense mass-losing phase in the the lives of asymptotic giant branch stars. PNe have a stunning variety of shapes, most of which are not spherically symmetric. The debate over what makes and shapes the circumstellar gas of these evolved, intermediate mass stars has raged for two decades. Today the community is reaching a consensus that single stars cannot trivially manufacture PNe and impart to them non spherical shapes and that a binary companion, possibly even a sub-stellar one, might be needed in a majority of cases. This theoretical conjecture has however not been tested observationally. In this review we discuss the problem both from the theoretical and observational standpoints, explaining the obstacles that stand in the way of a clean observational test and ways to ameliorate the situation. We also discuss indirect tests of this hypothesis and its implications for stellar and galactic astrophysics. Subject headings: planetary nebulae: general – binaries: general – stars: evolution – stars: AGB and post-AGB – white dwarfs 1. Introduction bated whether stellar rotation and global magnetic fields can be sustained in single AGB stars and In the current paradigm a planetary nebula thus confer non-spherical morphologies to PNe (PN) is produced by a mass-losing asymptotic (e.g., Soker & Livio 1989; Soker 1997; De Marco giant branch (AGB) star and later ionized by 2006; Zijlstra 2007, but see also Bond et al. 1978). the AGB star core, on its way to becoming a Recently, the debate has been rekindled (Soker white dwarf (WD). The great majority of PNe 2006b; Nordhaus et al. 2007) by the argument are not spherical. They display axi- and point- that in a large majority of cases, single AGB stars symmetries, sometime with the addition of jet-like are unlikely be able to sustain large scale magnetic arXiv:0902.1137v1 [astro-ph.GA] 6 Feb 2009 structures. These shapes have been attributed fields for long enough to affect shaping, because to the action of stellar rotation and/or mag- the field drains the star of angular momentum on netic fields (e.g., Garc´ıa-Segura et al. 1999, 2005), short time scales and quenches itself. As the mod- which result in an equatorially-concentrated AGB els of, e.g., Garcia-Segura and collaborators have mass-loss. When the post-AGB star heats up, shown, magnetic fields can be an effective ingre- it blows a fast but tenuous wind, which is con- dient in shaping many PNe, but in those models strained at the equator, resulting in an elliptical the magnetic field strength was assumed constant or bipolar PN. In a minority of cases, the action and was not coupled to the negative feedback ac- of a companion is thought to be required in order tion of the stellar envelope. Without the action to produce jets, point symmetries, or to explain of an angular momentum source, the field would off-center central stars (CSPN; see Balick & Frank vanish. Such an angular momentum source could 2002 for a review). effectively be provided by a stellar or sub-stellar For the last two decades the community de- companion. If this is what actually happens, then 1 PNe would be, by and large, a binary-interaction two paradigms is more correct. The obstacles to phenomenon. detecting binary CSPNe, in particular for peri- In addition to the problem of understanding ods longer than a few weeks, are substantial. As how PN symmetries diverge from spherical, we a result, the CSPN binary fraction is not well also need to explain why they form in the first known. Planets and brown dwarfs have never been place. Stars approaching the final phases of their detected around CSPNe and it is unlikely that AGB life transit to a high mass-loss mode, ef- many will be detected in the near future around fectively ejecting the remaining envelope in the these generally distant targets. In addition, the space of a few hundred to a few thousand years. overall number of confirmed binary CSPNe that This heavy mass-loss, dubbed the “super-wind”, could be used to relate binarity and PN morphol- is observed in end-of-AGB stars and explains PN ogy is rather small. Finally, it is already clear masses and their density structures. Although that many nebulae we call today PNe are more several ideas have been presented in the litera- related to other phenomena. These PN mimics ture (e.g., Lagadec & Zijlstra 2008), we still do not (e.g., Miszalski et al. 2009; Frew 2008) can compli- know what triggers the super-wind. A companion cate the task of an observational test PN origin. interacting with the expanding AGB star could act Yet, this issue needs to be tackled observation- 1 as such trigger. ally : we need to obtain a statistical sample of bi- In this paper we review the problems of PN for- nary CSPNe free from PN mimics and study these mation (triggering of the super-wind) and shaping binaries in relation to their PNe. We also need to (making the super-wind diverge from a spherical develop techniques to detect substellar compan- distribution) in the context of binarity. We dwell ions and to identify past mergers indirectly. more on the shaping part of the problem, while In this paper we review the PN Binary Hy- leaving a review of the possible physical connec- pothesis, starting with its theoretical basis (§ 2). tions between binarity and super-wind trigger to We then review (§ 3) what is currently known future papers. We call the hypothesis that com- about CSPNe in binary systems. In § 4 we re- panions are the main cause of PN formation and view direct and indirect predictions and tests of shaping, the Binary Hypothesis. the PN Binary Hypothesis. In § 5 we cast the PN In the Binary Hypothesis, PNe form more read- population in the context of its progenitors (the ily around binaries, where by binary we intend a AGB and post-AGB stars) as well as progeny (the star accompanied by another star, a brown dwarf WDs), highlighting how the binary characteristics or even a planetary system. If this were the case, of these two populations enlighten and complicate the CSPN population would derive primarily from the Binary Hypothesis for PNe. In § 6 we bring those main sequence stars that have such com- related binary classes, such as cataclysmic vari- panions, and would have a relatively higher multi- ables, to bear on the Binary Hypothesis. We then plicity fraction or be often the product of mergers (§ 7) report a few additional challenges facing any (although some PNe could still derive from single paradigm for the formation of PNe. We conclude stars). in § 8. Throughout this review, we have made ex- tensive use of Bruce Balick’s Osterbrock PN Im- By contrast, we shall refer to the current model age Catalogue2, to which we refer the reader for for the formation and shaping of PNe as the Sin- images of the many PNe discussed. gle Star Paradigm. We stress that in the Single Star Paradigm, PN origin and shaping can be in- 1 To tackle this problem a collaboration, dubbed PlaN-B¨ for fluenced by binarity, but binarity is not a favored Planetary Nebula Binaries, was forged at the Asymmetric channel and any other mechanisms are as likely to PN IV meeting, that took place in La Palma, Spain, in form and shape PN as binary interactions. Hence June 2007 – www.wiyn.org/planb/. 2 in the Single Star Paradigm, PNe are formed and http://www.astro.washington.edu/balick/PNIC/ shaped by single stars as well as binaries, but in different proportions compared with the Binary Hypothesis. Observations cannot yet discern which of the 2 2. Considerations on the mass-loss would not be enough to explain them. need for a companion Sahai & Trauger (1998) demonstrated that only if the post-AGB mass-loss is heavily collimated In this Section we will review the debate over these shapes could be explained (see Fig. 1). Once what are the actual causes that shape PNe into again, these collimated outflows were assumed. axi-symmetric, point-symmetric and asymmetric Finally, Bujarrabal et al. (2001) determined that geometries and why a companion might be called most pre-PNe (nebulae that are not yet photo- for (see also Balick & Frank 2002 and Soker 1997). ionized and shine by starlight reflection or shock- ionization) have outflow linear momenta much in 2.1. From AGB to PN: the super-wind excess of what could be driven by radiation pres- and the mass-loss geometry sure from single stars. Stars between ∼1 and 10 M⊙ undergo two We can all agree, that a complete model for the phases of expansion, one after core hydrogen runs evolution and shaping of PNe, needs to explain out, called the red giant branch (RGB) and one the surge in mass-loss rate called the super-wind, following core helium burning, called the AGB and the origin of AGB and post-AGB mass-loss (e.g., Vassiliadis & Wood 1994; Herwig 2000; Iben geometries, rather than assume them. 1995). At the end of the AGB phase the stellar 2.2. “Derived” shaping agents: Stellar ro- wind (speeds of 10-15 km s−1, mass-loss rates tation and magnetic fields −7 −1 ∼10 M⊙ yr ) unexpectedly increases in in- Non-spherical AGB mass-loss geometries have tensity with mass-loss rates surging to as much −4 −1 been traditionally ascribed to “stellar rotation, as 10 M⊙ yr (Delfosse et al.

Load more