Exploring Moral Injury: Theory, Measurement, and Applications
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Military Behavioral Health ISSN: 2163-5781 (Print) 2163-5803 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/umbh20 Exploring Moral Injury: Theory, Measurement, and Applications Hazel R. Atuel, Ryan Chesnut, Cameron Richardson, Daniel F. Perkins & Carl A. Castro To cite this article: Hazel R. Atuel, Ryan Chesnut, Cameron Richardson, Daniel F. Perkins & Carl A. Castro (2020): Exploring Moral Injury: Theory, Measurement, and Applications, Military Behavioral Health, DOI: 10.1080/21635781.2020.1753604 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/21635781.2020.1753604 Published online: 17 Apr 2020. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=umbh20 MILITARY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH https://doi.org/10.1080/21635781.2020.1753604 RESEARCH ARTICLE Exploring Moral Injury: Theory, Measurement, and Applications Hazel R. Atuela, Ryan Chesnutb, Cameron Richardsonb, Daniel F. Perkinsb, and Carl A. Castroc aCenter for Innovation and Research on Veterans & Military Families, University of Southern California (USC), Center for Innovation and Research on Veterans & Military Families, Los Angeles, California; bClearinghouse for Military Family Readiness, The Pennsylvania State University (PSU), Clearinghouse for Military Family Readiness, University Park, Pennsylvania; cSchool of Social Work and Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California ABSTRACT KEYWORDS This research brief summarizes and highlights presentations on moral injury related to the- Moral injury; theory; ory, measurement, and applications. The overall was to identify current gaps and propose measurement; applica- next steps to advance the science of moral injury. tions; research During the writing of this research brief (late March event or series of events that have moral implications. 2020), our world is facing a new normal. On a global Whether or not this outbreak, particularly focusing on level, the coronavirus outbreak has disrupted how we the human factors at work (e.g., decisions made at work, interact with each other, engage in mundane various levels, rhetoric used to frame the event), will activities, and participate in community life. Our daily eventually fall under the rubric of moral injury will be lives had to change. And, in a relatively short period a topic of later discussions. For now, we would like to of time, we were compelled and propelled to accom- acknowledge and note that these historic events might modate alternative ways of living to survive. We had force us to reconsider our current knowledge of moral to change. As we explore new ways or continue old injury in the foreseeable future. Stated differently, ways of thriving in newly defined individual and what we are going through is perhaps an invitation to social spaces, one thing is clear: the experience of move us beyond what we already know and have change is both personal and communal. Personal applied to a subset of the population to a more because each of us had unique ways of readjusting expanded understanding that will have wider implica- and communal because this pivoting is a shared tions to the varieties of human experience. experience with others who are proximal and distal to With that said, let us now turn to what we initially us. Ultimately, this experience has changed both our set out to do. personal stories and community histories. What does this reflection on the coronavirus pan- Toward a science of moral injury demic have to do with a research brief on moral injury? Because as social scientists, we simply could In the Fall of 2019, we at the University of Southern not help ourselves but think, try to make sense of, or California’s Center for Innovation and Research on even go as far as to find purpose in this chaos. We Veterans & Military Families (USC) and the could conceive of this unprecedented worldwide event Pennsylvania State University’s Clearinghouse for as a real-world experiment on our response to the suf- Military Family Readiness (PSU) were in the planning fering or death we read in our news feeds, or possibly stages of a military research summit to be held in know of directly or indirectly. How are we changed early February 2020. What emerged from our conver- by the knowledge or experience of our own or others’ sations was that we were leaning toward building a suffering as well as the death of others? We are raising science of moral injury. Admittedly a very ambitious this critical question upfront because some of the research agenda, that prompted us to ask each other, issues at the heart of moral injury speak to the human “where do we even start?”. We chose to answer three capacity and ability to respond to an adverse singular basic questions: (1) what do we already know, (2) CONTACT Hazel R. Atuel [email protected] Center for Innovation and Research on Veterans & Military Families, University of Southern California (USC), Center for Innovation and Research on Veterans & Military Families, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0001, USA. ß 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2 H. R. ATUEL ET AL. what else do we need to know, and (3) what are the importance of the relational component of moral scientific building-blocks needed to move the field injury. As she explained, a person suffering from forward? Guided by these queries and reined in by moral injury has a broken relationship with self, with what can be done in a one-day summit, we decided to another person, and/or with a higher being or power. focus on identifying gaps in and advancements for the When spirituality or religiosity is salient, there is the current knowledge base in terms of theory, measure- possibility of receiving treatments other than or above ment, and applications. We do not need to belabor and beyond the traditional offerings made available at you, the reader, on the importance of theory and Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, specifically measurement in laying the conceptual foundation of a Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT; Resick et al., particular field, coupled with the critical role of appli- 2017) and Prolonged Exposure Therapy (PE; Foa cations in empirically demonstrating the robustness et al., 2007). Second, developed in conjunction with and utility of a particular construct. What was import- chaplains, spiritually integrated treatments focus on ant for us was to set the conceptual and empirical moral injury dimensions (e.g., shame, moral concerns, footings as parallel tracks within this budding scien- religious struggles, loss of faith) that are not part of tific field. secular treatment modules. When tailored this way, Considering that the majority of research has healing is postulated to occur at the level of the soul focused on the clinical correlates of moral injury (see and involves engaging in traditional spiritual or reli- Griffin et al., 2019 for the most recent review), we gious acts such as lament, repentance, confession, decided to convene researchers and practitioners who and atonement. offered alternative explanations or presented on rela- Dr. Hazel Atuel (USC) presented on a virtue-based tively new findings that had direct consequences to definition of moral injury (Atuel & Castro, 2019; theory, measurement, or practice (in terms of preven- Atuel, Jones, Greenberg, Williamson, Barr, Vermetten tion and intervention). Our deliberate choice to hear et al., in preparation) that borrows from moral phil- divergent perspectives was driven by a desire to pro- osophy (e.g., Nichomacean Ethics; trans. 2006), moral mote conversations that would forge new ways of psychology (e.g., Strohminger et al., 2017), character conceptualizing and measuring moral injury, as well psychology (e.g., Lapsley & Stey, 2014), and social as its cross-cultural applications. Hence, on February psychology (e.g., Brewer, 1991). This multidisciplinary 11, 2020, USC and PSU hosted the joint research framework advances a broader theoretical foundation summit titled, “Exploring Moral Injury: Theory, that is not defined by and does not necessarily reflect Measurement, and Applications” in Los Angeles, clinical impairments. This framework provides a char- California. What follows are summaries and highlights acter pathway that is differentiated from the trad- of the different presentations shared at the summit. itional clinical pathway by defining moral injury as a psychological state that arises in the aftermath of Theoretical frameworks on moral injury moral failure. To have an effect on an individual’s Dr. Donna Ames (University of California, Los character and identity, the moral failure experience Angeles and the Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical has to be of significance, often involving suffering or Center) presented on the spiritual dimension of moral death. The definition of suffering, however, is not lim- injury – ranging from measurement (Koenig et al., ited to traumatic events (e.g., war trauma, sexual 2018) to spiritually integrated treatments (Pearce assault). Rather, suffering is argued to stem from a et al., 2018). This work is in collaboration with Dr. wider range of behaviors or interactions reflecting the Harold Koenig whose work on moral injury is based lack of human goodness (or human excellence in on the intersection of spirituality, theology, and terms of the Aristotelian moral virtues), with simple health. First, based on the validation studies of the acts (e.g., apathy or meanness toward another person) Moral Injury