Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism arXiv:2108.10088
Thi Nhung Dao1 , Margarete Muhlleitner¨ 2 , Anh Vu Phan1,3,4
1Institute For Interdisciplinary Research in Science and Education, ICISE, 590000, Quy Nhon, Vietnam.
2Institute for Theoretical Physics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Wolfgang-Gaede-Str. 1, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
3University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
4Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
SUSY 2021, 24 Aug 2021
Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 1 / 28 Content
1 Motivation
2 Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (NMSSM) with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism
3 Calculation of the Neutral Higgs Boson Masses
4 Constraints
5 Numerical Analysis
6 Conclusions
Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 2 / 28 Motivation
Higgs boson • Hierarchy problem of the Higgs mass and its quantum corrections
2 2 2 ∼ Λ ∼ Mpl mh.
• In SM, Higgs mass is a free parameter
Neutrino experiments Experiments suggest a 3 X 0 < mνi < 0.12 eV me . i=1
aNuFIT 5.0, JHEP 09 (2020) 178, arXiv:2007.14792; Planck 2018, A&A 641, A6 (2020), arXiv:1807.06209.
Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) Fine-tuning µ-problem
Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 3 / 28 Content
1 Motivation
2 Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (NMSSM) with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism
3 Calculation of the Neutral Higgs Boson Masses
4 Constraints
5 Numerical Analysis
6 Conclusions
Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 4 / 28 NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism
resolves problems with Higgs boson
Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism (NMSSM) no µ-problem explains neutrino masses
We further impose R-parity symmetry + Z3 symmetry .
1 Z3 charge assignment determines how neutrino masses are generated . neutrino singlets ˆ ˆ c ˆ c ˆ ˆ c ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ c ˆ Qi Ui Di Li Ei Hu Hd S Ni Xi SU(2)L 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 U(1)Y 1/3 -4/3 2/3 -1 2 1 -1 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 Z3 1 ω ω 1 ω ω ω ω ω ω L 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 0 -1 1
1I. Gogoladze, et al., Phys.Lett.B 672 (2009) 235-239; I. Gogoladze, et al., Phys.Lett.B 718 (2013) 1008-1013 Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 5 / 28 NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism
Inverse Seesaw Mechanism in NMSSM ˆ a ˆb ˆ c ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ c WNMSSM ⊃ −yν abHu L N + λX SXX + µX XN .
c In the basis (νL, N , X), the mass matrix is hH0i hH0i 0 MD 0 u u ν T MISS = MD 0 µX , T 0 µX MX ν c X N c ν with L N X L 0 T MD = hHu iyν , MX = hSi (λX + λX ).
λX violates lepton number, µX is the only hSi dimensionful parameter, and µX ∼ TeV.
Mass matrix for light neutrinos
T −1 −1 T Mlight ≈ MD (µX ) MX µX MD .
Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 6 / 28 NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism
Superpotential
ˆ a ˆ b ˆ c ˆ a ˆ b ˆ c ˆ a ˆb ˆ c WMSSM = −ab yuHu Q U − yd Hd Q D − ye Hd L E , 1 W = W − λSˆHˆ aHˆ b + κSˆ3 − y Hˆ aLˆbNˆ c + λ SˆXˆ Xˆ + µ Xˆ Nˆ c . NMSSM MSSM ab d u 3 ν ab u X X
Soft SUSY breaking terms
soft 2 2 2 2 2 ˜ 2 2 2 2 ˜ 2 2 ˜ 2 2 2 LMSSM = −m˜ Hd |Hd | − m˜ Hu |Hu| − m˜ Q |Q| − m˜ U |u˜R | − m˜ D |dR | − m˜ L|L| − m˜ E |˜eR | a ˜ b ∗ a ˜ b ˜∗ a ˜ b ∗ + ab(yuAuHu Q u˜R − yd Ad Hd Q dR − ye Ae Hd Q ˜eR + h.c.) 1 − (M B˜B˜ + M W˜ W˜ + M G˜G˜ + h.c) . 2 1 2 i i 3 1 Lsoft = Lsoft − m˜ 2 |S|2 + ( A λSHaHb − A κS3 + y A HaL˜bN˜ ∗ NMSSM MSSM S ab λ d u 3 κ ab ν ν u ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ∗ 2 ˜ 2 2 ˜ 2 + λX AX SXX + µX BµX XN + h.c.) − m˜ X X − m˜ N N ,
We obtain 5 neutral Higgs bosons, 9 neutrinos, and 18 sneutrinos.
Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 7 / 28 NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism
Literature review: Impact of (s)neutrino sectors on SM-like Higgs mass in NMSSM arXiv:1209.5984 with inverse seesaw using an approximate one-loop correction
One-loop correction solely from the (s)neutrino sector to SM-like arXiv:1303.6465 Higgs mass in NMSSM extended by 1 neutrino superfield
Full one-loop correction to neutral Higgs boson masses in µνSSM arXiv:1906.06173
One-loop + dominant two-loop corrections to Higgs boson masses arXiv:1007.5512 in MSSM with type I seesaw arXiv:1304.6103
One-loop corrections of (s)neutrinos in MSSM with inverse seesaw arXiv:1311.3497 using the one-loop effective potential approach arXiv:1405.5478
Our work: Computation of the complete one-loop and incorporation with dominant two-loop 2 corrections of O(αs αt + αt ) to Higgs boson masses, investigation of the impact of the (s)neutrino sector taking into account important constraints.
Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 8 / 28 Content
1 Motivation
2 Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (NMSSM) with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism
3 Calculation of the Neutral Higgs Boson Masses
4 Constraints
5 Numerical Analysis
6 Conclusions
Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 9 / 28 Calculation of the Neutral Higgs Boson Masses
Loop-corrected neutral Higgs mass matrix
2 ˆ 2 Mhi hj = mhi δhi hj − Σhi hj (p ), i, j = 1, ..., 5,
ˆ 2 with tree-level Higgs masses mhi , renormalized self-energies Σhi hj (p ). ˆ 2 2 1 2h † T i Σhi hj (p ) = Σhi hj (p ) + p R δZhh + δZhh R 2 ij
1 h † T i h T i − R δZhhMhh + MhhδZhh R − RδMhh(R) , 2 ij ij 2 with unrenormalized self-energies Σhi hj (p ), Higgs mass matrix Mhh, its counterterm δMhh, orthogonal matrix R diagonalizing Mhh, wave-function renormalization matrix δZhh; everything in basis with Goldstone boson singled out.
2 Mhi hj is diagonalized applying iterative method , using a mixed DR-OS renormalization scheme.
2arXiv:1111.4952, arXiv:1306.3926, arXiv:1903.11358, arXiv:1206.6806 Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 10 / 28 →
Calculation of the Neutral Higgs Boson Masses
2 Σhi hj (p ) includes complete one-loop corrections given by generic diagrams
x xk x xl hj
hi hj hi hj hi hj hi xk x = G, G−,H− x = h, n,˜ e˜γ , u˜γ , d˜γ x = Z,W − x = n, χ˜0
xl x xl x hj hj hj hj h h h h i i x i i xk xk x − − − γ γ ˜γ x = e, u, d, χ˜ x = H , G x = h, n,˜ e˜ , u˜ , d x = ηZ , η+, η−
Z W − W − x hj hj hj hj
hi hi hi hi x x x x − − − − − x = G, hk x = H , G x = H , G x = Z,W
and dominant two-loop contributions of order O(αs αt ) from M. Muhlleitner,¨ et al. 13’, 2 and O(αt ) from T.N.Dao, et al. 19’.
Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 11 / 28
1 Calculation of the Neutral Higgs Boson Masses
Calculation of the loop-corrected Higgs boson masses in NMSSM with inverse seesaw mechanism implemented in the code NMSSMCALC-nuSS.
Download from the url: https://www.itp.kit.edu/∼maggie/NMSSMCALC-nuSS/
Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 12 / 28 Content
1 Motivation
2 Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (NMSSM) with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism
3 Calculation of the Neutral Higgs Boson Masses
4 Constraints
5 Numerical Analysis
6 Conclusions
Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 13 / 28 Constraints
We take into account the following constraints in our study • Higgs data • active neutrino data • oblique parameters
• radiative l1 → l2 + γ decays
Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 14 / 28 Constraints
Higgs data Active neutrino data Oblique parameters Radiative l1 → l2 + γ decays
• Constraints from Higgs data and Higgs searches taken into account through HiggsSignals-2.5.13 within 2σ and HiggsBound-54. • SM-like Higgs boson mass required in the range [122,128] GeV.
3P. Bechtle, et al., Eur.Phys.J. C74 (2014) 2711, arXiv:1305.1933 4P. Bechtle, et al., Eur.Phys.J.C 80 (2020) 12, 1211, arXiv:2006.06007 Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 15 / 28 Constraints
Higgs data Active neutrino data Oblique parameters Radiative l1 → l2 + γ decays
7 Masses mνi (i = 1, 2, 3), mixing angles θ12, θ23, θ13 of light neutrinos, 9 × 9 neutrino mixing matrix Uν , and Neutrino oscillations 2 −5 2 2 2 2 ∆m21 ∈ [6.82, 8.04] × 10 eV , ∆m = m − m , cij = cos θij , sij = sin θij . ij νi νj 2 s12 ∈ [0.269, 0.343]. 5 Planck 2018 results For normal ordering 3 2 −3 2 X ∆m31 ∈ [2.435, 2.598] × 10 eV , mνi < 0.12 eV. 2 i=1 s23 ∈ [0.415, 0.616], 6 2 Deviation from unitarity s13 ∈ [0.02032, 0.02410], ν Nij = U , i, j = 1, 2, 3 ij δCP ∈ [120, 369]. 3 3 X ∗ X ∗ For inverted ordering 1 − Nek N < 0.07, Nek N < 0.03, ek µk 2 −3 2 k=1 k=1 ∆m23 ∈ [2.414, 2.581] × 10 eV , 3 2 X ∗ s23 ∈ [0.419, 0.617], 1 − Nµk N < 0.07. µk 2 k=1 s13 ∈ [0.02052, 0.02428],
δCP ∈ [193, 352].
5Planck 2018, A&A 641, A6 (2020), arXiv:1807.06209 6S. Parke, et al., Phys. Rev. D 93, 113009 (2016), arXiv:1508.05095 7NuFIT 5.0, JHEP 09 (2020) 178, arXiv:2007.14792 Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 16 / 28 Constraints
Higgs data Active neutrino data Oblique parameters Radiative l1 → l2 + γ decays
Oblique parameters S, T , U8 new new 1 ΠWW (0) ΠZZ (0) T = 2 − 2 , α MW MZ 2 2 new 2 new 2 2 new 2 new 2 ! 4sW cW ΠZZ (MZ ) − ΠZZ (0) cW − sW ΠZγ (MZ ) Πγγ (MZ ) S = 2 − 2 − 2 , α MZ sW cW MZ MZ
2 new 2 new new 2 new 2 ! 4sW ΠWW (MW ) − ΠWW (0) cW ΠZγ (MZ ) Πγγ (MZ ) S + U = 2 − 2 − 2 . α MW sW MZ MZ Current best fit points with 1σ uncertainties T = 0.03 ± 0.12 S = −0.01 ± 0.10 U = 0.02 ± 0.11
8P. Zyla et al., Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2020 (2020) 8, 083C01 Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 17 / 28 Constraints
Higgs data Active neutrino data Oblique parameters Radiative l1 → l2 + γ decays
9 Current bounds on the decays l1 → l2 + γ at 90% confidence level BR(µ− → e−γ) < 4.2 × 10−13 bbbb BR(τ − → e−γ) < 3.3 × 10−8 BR(τ − → µ−γ) < 4.4 × 10−8
l2 l2 l2 n˜i nl nl
− − − χ˜k H G l1 l1 l1 − − − χ˜k H G γ γ γ
l2 l2 l2 nl nl nl
W − G− W − l1 l1 l1 G− W − W − γ γ γ
9P. Zyla et al., Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2020 (2020) 8, 083C01 Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 18 / 28
1 Content
1 Motivation
2 Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (NMSSM) with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism
3 Calculation of the Neutral Higgs Boson Masses
4 Constraints
5 Numerical Analysis
6 Conclusions
Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 19 / 28 Numerical Analysis
2 Impact of (s)neutrinos on loop-corrected Higgs boson masses Mi at O(αt αs + αt )
max hu : SM-like Higgs. Yν : max element of neutrino Yukawa matrix. gray: points satisfying constraints. no no (no) ∆i = |Mi − Mi |/Mi , with Mi : loop corrected Higgs mass (without) inverse seesaw.
Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 20 / 28 Numerical Analysis
2 Impact of (s)neutrinos on loop-corrected Higgs boson masses Mi at O(αt αs + αt )
gray traingles: points satisfying constraints
Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 21 / 28 Numerical Analysis
2 Impact of (s)neutrinos on loop-corrected Higgs boson masses Mi at O(αt αs + αt )
no no Color code indicates ∆i = Mi − Mi /Mi in %. MX = 2 hSi λX .
Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 22 / 28 Numerical Analysis
Impact of constraints: lepton-flavour violation (LFV), oblique parameters (STU), non-unitarity (NoU)
Only λX and µX vary. Other parameters fixed at our chosen parameter point.
Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 23 / 28 Content
1 Motivation
2 Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (NMSSM) with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism
3 Calculation of the Neutral Higgs Boson Masses
4 Constraints
5 Numerical Analysis
6 Conclusions
Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 24 / 28 Conclusions
• We computed the complete one-loop and incorporated the two-loop O(αt (αs + αt )) corrections to the Higgs boson masses implemented to a Fortran code NMSSMCALC-nuSS. • We imposed the constraints from Higgs data, neutrino oscillation data, oblique parameters S,T,U, and lepton flavor-violating decays li → lj + γ. • We found that the impact of (s)neutrinos is largest for the SM-like Higgs boson mass (10%) and can be significant for other Higgs bosons depending on their mixing with SM-like Higgs.
• We showed the importance of the S, T , U, and l1 → l2γ constraints on the validity of the parameter scenarios. Acknowledgments: The research of MM was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under grant 396021762 - TRR 257. T.N.D is funded by the Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under grant number 103.01-2020.17.
Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 25 / 28 Thank you for your listening
Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 26 / 28 Back-up slides
Analysis of the (s)neutrinos sector: Loop corrected branching ratio
Figure 2: Horizontal line: experimental upper limit on the branching ratio
Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 27 / 28 Back-up slides
Analysis of the (s)neutrinos sector: Loop corrected branching ratio
Vu (HCMUS,IFIRSE) Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism 28 / 28