<<

PHYSICAL REVIEW D 74, 015003 (2006) Seesaw fermion masses in an SO(10) grand unified theory

Kaushik Bhattacharya* and Utpal Sarkar† Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad 380 009, India

C. R. Das‡ and G. Rajasekaranx Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai 600 113, India

Bipin R. Desai1,k 1Physics Department, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA (Received 28 January 2006; published 7 July 2006) In this work we study an SO(10) GUT model with minimum Higgs representations belonging only to the 210 and 16 dimensional representations of SO(10). We add a singlet fermion S in addition to the usual 16 dimensional representation containing and . There are no Higgs bi-doublets and so charged fermion masses come from one-loop corrections. Consequently all the fermion masses, Dirac and Majorana, are of the seesaw type. We minimize the Higgs potential and show how the left-right symmetry is broken in our model where it is assumed that a D-parity odd Higgs field gets a at the grand unification scale. From the group equations we infer that in our model unification happens at 1015 GeV and left-right symmetry can be extended up to some values just above 1011 GeV. The Yukawa sector of our model is completely different from most of the standard grand unified theories and we explicitly show how the Yukawa sector will look in the different phases and briefly comment on the running of the top- mass. We end with a brief analysis of number asymmetry generated from the interactions in our model.

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.015003 PACS numbers: 12.10.Dm, 11.10.Hi, 12.10.Kt, 12.15.Ff

of minimality or simplicity, where the main aim is to I. INTRODUCTION explain all experiments and have maximum predictability. The SO(10) grand unified theory has several interesting In the present article we shall study an SO(10) GUT, features [1–5]. It can accommodate left-right symmetry as which has the minimum dimensions of the Higgs scalars. one of the intermediate symmetries and hence provides an In any SO(10) GUT the minimal number of Higgs scalar explanation of parity violation [6]. B L is a generator includes an SU2L symmetry breaking Higgs scalar, of the group SO(10) and hence lepton number violation which can give masses to the fermions and some scalars takes place spontaneously. This explains the origin of that can break the B L symmetry along with the lepton number violation and Majorana mass natu- SU2R symmetry and can give Majorana masses to the rally. The smallness of neutrino masses is assured by the . In addition, there is one Higgs scalar which seesaw mechanism, so that by keeping the scale of B L breaks the group SO(10) GUT. One conventional model violation high the smallness of the neutrino mass is guar- includes a Higgs bi-doublet [a 10-plet of SO(10) Higgs anteed. Quarks and leptons are treated equally in SO(10) scalar, which is doublet under both the SU2L and SU2R grand unified theory (GUT). Gauge coupling unification is groups] and both SU2L and SU2R Higgs triplets. In consistent with all low energy results. such models with triplet Higgs scalars neutrinos acquire On the one hand there are many attractive features of the masses at the tree level. The SO(10) representation that SO(10) GUT, on the other the predictability becomes low. contains this Higgs scalar is of 126 dimensions. In another Depending on the symmetry breaking pattern and Higgs version of the model, one breaks the left-right symmetry scalar contents, the model can have widely differing pre- and the B L symmetry by doublets of SU2L and dictions. Attempts have been made to construct a minimal SU2R groups. This Higgs field belongs to a 16-plet model. In one approach the minimal model is constructed representation of SO(10). For symmetry breaking and giv- with minimum numbers of parameters, while in the other ing fermion masses another 10-plet Higgs scalar is intro- approach minimum numbers of Higgs scalars are included duced, which contains the bi-doublet Higgs and hence in the model. There are also models without any intention gives tree-level masses to the fermions and the neutrinos acquire only Dirac masses of the order of other fermion *Electronic address: [email protected] masses. There is no Majorana mass term for the neutrinos † Electronic address: [email protected] and hence a seesaw mechanism is not possible. However, ‡Electronic address: [email protected] xElectronic address: [email protected] there exist effective higher-dimensional operators, which kElectronic address: [email protected] can give correct Majorana masses to both the left-handed Electronic address: [email protected] and right-handed neutrinos.

1550-7998=2006=74(1)=015003(13) 015003-1 © 2006 The American Physical Society