The Organisation of Polydomous Nesting in Wood Ant Colonies: Behaviour, Networks, Foraging and Resource Redistribution

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Organisation of Polydomous Nesting in Wood Ant Colonies: Behaviour, Networks, Foraging and Resource Redistribution The organisation of polydomous nesting in wood ant colonies: behaviour, networks, foraging and resource redistribution. Samuel Ellis PhD University of York Biology April 2015 Abstract Social behaviours are an important component of evolutionary success. This is perhaps most evident in the societies of social insects: the interactions between individuals underlie the organisation of their highly complex, and highly successful, societies. An important socially organised determinant of ecological success for social insects is nesting strategy. Many ant species can have a polydomous nesting strategy: a polydomous colony inhabits several spatially separated, but socially connected, nests. How this complex nesting strategy is organised is largely unknown. I undertook a series of studies to investigate how polydomous colonies of the ecologically important red wood ant Formica lugubris are organised at the individual, nest and colony levels. I found that resources are redistributed locally, between nests, within polydomous wood ant colonies. Further investigation showed that this local resource redistribution is mediated by individual workers treating other nests of the colony as food sources. I also investigated the role that nests which do not appear to be foraging are playing in polydomous wood ant colonies. I found that these non-foraging nests, rather than having a specialised role, are part of the colony expansion process. I explored the importance of resource acquisition to individual nests by investigating the effect that position in the colony nest-network has on the survival, reproduction and growth of nests within a polydomous colony. I found that position within a dynamic nest-network was an important determinant of life-history success for individual nests in wood ant colonies. My results suggest that little behavioural innovation is needed for a colony to become polydomous, and indicate benefits a polydomous nesting strategy may provide a colony. These results highlight how understanding the proximate mechanism and development of a social behaviour, can give important insights into the ultimate function and evolution of a life-history strategy. ii Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................................................. ii Contents ................................................................................................................................................ iii List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................ vi Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. vii Author Declaration ............................................................................................................................ viii Chapter 1: Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 General Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Polydomy ................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 The Formica rufa group ........................................................................................... 5 1.4 The Longshaw Estate ............................................................................................... 7 1.5 Thesis outline ........................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 2: Polydomy in Red Wood Ants .......................................................................................... 11 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 12 2.2 The relationship between polydomy and polygyny ............................................... 15 2.3 Ecological advantages of polydomy ...................................................................... 18 2.4 Consequences of polydomy for red wood ant colonies ......................................... 24 2.5 Future Directions ................................................................................................... 26 2.6 Conclusions ............................................................................................................ 27 Chapter 3: Resource redistribution in polydomous ant nest-networks: local or global? ............. 29 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 30 3.2 Methods.................................................................................................................. 31 3.3 Results .................................................................................................................... 37 3.4 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 40 Chapter 4: Inter-nest food sharing within wood ant colonies: a simple behavioural mechanism promotes nesting strategy plasticity .............................................................................. 45 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 46 4.2 Methods.................................................................................................................. 46 4.3 Results .................................................................................................................... 51 4.4 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 56 Chapter 5: The role of non-foraging nests in polydomous wood ant colonies ............................... 62 5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 63 5.2 Methods.................................................................................................................. 66 5.3 Results and Discussion .......................................................................................... 71 5.4 General Discussion ................................................................................................ 82 iii Chapter 6: Survival, reproduction and growth: how position in a dynamic network impacts life-history .............................................................................................................................. 84 6.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 85 6.2 Methods.................................................................................................................. 85 6.3 Results .................................................................................................................... 94 6.4 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 98 Chapter 7: Discussion ....................................................................................................................... 101 7.1 Thesis Overview .................................................................................................. 101 7.2 Polydomy in red wood ants .................................................................................. 101 7.3 Limitations and future work ................................................................................. 104 7.4 General Discussion .............................................................................................. 108 Appendices ......................................................................................................................................... 111 Notes on the Appendices ................................................................................................. 111 Appendix A: Colony Maps .............................................................................................. 112 Appendix B: Nest properties vs. Network Properties ...................................................... 125 Appendix C: Assortativity by colony............................................................................... 126 Appendix D: Trail Strength vs. Trail Betweenness ......................................................... 127 Appendix E: Trail Type vs. Trail Betweenness ............................................................... 128 Appendix F: Chapter 4 GLMM details ............................................................................ 129 Appendix G: Chapter 5 GLMM details ........................................................................... 130 Appendix H: Chapter 6 GLMM details ........................................................................... 131 References .......................................................................................................................................... 132 iv List of Figures Figure 1.1 Traits associated with polydomous nesting in ants. ............................................... 3 Figure 1.2 The distribution of the F. rufa group in
Recommended publications
  • Killarney, Barraduff & Gneeveguilla Wwtp Discharges Natura Impact Statement
    KERRY COUNTY COUNCIL COMHAIRLE CONTAE CHIARRAÍ KILLARNEY, BARRADUFF & GNEEVEGUILLA WWTP DISCHARGES NATURA IMPACT STATEMENT For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. JANUARY 2010 CONSULTING ENGINEERS Sherwood House, Sherwood Avenue, Taylor’s Hill, Galway Suite D4, The Cubes Offices, Beacon South Quarter, Sandyford Dublin 18 EPA Export 04-11-2011:03:50:18 Quality Control CLIENT Kerry County Council PROJECT NO 2178 PROJECT TITLE KILLARNEY, BARRADUFF & GNEEVEGUILLA WWTP DISCHARGES REPORT TITLE NATURA IMPACT STATEMENT Rev. Status Author(s) Reviewed By Approved By Issue Date 1 ISSUE GH MJ MJ 04.03.2011 For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. Natura Impact Statement Page 2 EPA Export 04-11-2011:03:50:18 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 4 1.1 BACKGROUND.....................................................................................................................4 1.2 APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT – LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT...............................................5 1.3 NATURA 2000 SITES ...........................................................................................................7 1.4 SCHEME LOCATIONS..........................................................................................................8 2 METHODOLOGY.......................................................................................... 11 2.1 DESK STUDY......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Foraging and the Information Theory of Gambling 2 Roland J
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/497198; this version posted June 25, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Optimal foraging and the information theory of gambling 2 Roland J. Baddeley1, Nigel R. Franks2, Edmund R. Hunt2,3 3 1School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, 12a Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TU, UK 4 2School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, 5 UK 6 3School of Computer Science, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Engineering Mathematics, Merchant 7 Venturers Building, 75 Woodland Road, Bristol, BS8 1UB, UK 8 ORCIDS: RJB, 0000-0002-7431-6580; NRF, 0000-0001-8139-9604; ERH, 0000-0002-9647-124X 9 Authors for correspondence: email: [email protected], [email protected] 10 Abstract 11 At a macroscopic level, part of the ant colony life-cycle is simple: a colony collects resources; these 12 resources are converted into more ants, and these ants in turn collect more resources. Because 13 more ants collect more resources, this is a multiplicative process, and the expected logarithm of the 14 amount of resources determines how successful the colony will be in the long run. Over 60 years 15 ago, Kelly showed, using information theoretic techniques, that the rate of growth of resources for 16 such a situation is optimised by a strategy of betting in proportion to the probability of payoff. Thus, 17 in the case of ants the fraction of the colony foraging at a given location should be proportional to 18 the probability that resources will be found there, a result widely applied in the mathematics of 19 gambling.
    [Show full text]
  • Asymmetric Ommatidia Count and Behavioural Lateralization in the Ant Temnothorax Albipennis
    Hunt, E. R. , Dornan, C., Sendova-Franks, A. B., & Franks, N. R. (2018). Asymmetric ommatidia count and behavioural lateralization in the ant Temnothorax albipennis. Scientific Reports, 8(1), [5825]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23652-4, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23652-4 Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record License (if available): CC BY Link to published version (if available): 10.1038/s41598-018-23652-4 10.1038/s41598-018-23652-4 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Nature at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23652-4 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Asymmetric ommatidia count and behavioural lateralization in the ant Temnothorax albipennis Received: 19 January 2018 Edmund R. Hunt 1, Ciara Dornan1, Ana B. Sendova-Franks 2 & Nigel R. Franks 1 Accepted: 15 March 2018 Workers of the house-hunting ant Temnothorax albipennis rely on visual edge following and landmark Published: xx xx xxxx recognition to navigate their rocky environment, and they also exhibit a leftward turning bias when exploring unknown nest sites. We used electron microscopy to count the number of ommatidia composing the compound eyes of workers, males and queens, to make an approximate assessment of their relative sampling resolution; and to establish whether there is an asymmetry in the number of ommatidia composing the workers’ eyes, which might provide an observable, mechanistic explanation for the turning bias.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bayesian Superorganism III: Externalised Memories Facilitate Distributed 2 Sampling 3 Edmund R
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/504241; this version posted December 21, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 The Bayesian Superorganism III: externalised memories facilitate distributed 2 sampling 3 Edmund R. Hunt1, Nigel R. Franks1, Roland J. Baddeley2 4 1School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, 5 BS8 1TQ, UK 6 2School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, 12a Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TU, UK 7 ORCIDS: ERH, 0000-0002-9647-124X; NRF, 0000-0001-8139-9604; RJB, 0000-0002-7431-6580 8 Authors for correspondence: email: [email protected], [email protected] 9 10 Abstract 11 A key challenge for any animal is to avoid wasting time by searching for resources in places it has 12 already found to be unprofitable. This challenge is particularly strong when the organism is a central 13 place forager – returning to a nest between foraging bouts – because it is destined repeatedly to 14 cover much the same ground. Furthermore, this problem will reach its zenith if many individuals 15 forage from the same central place, as in social insects. Foraging performance may be greatly 16 enhanced by coordinating movement trajectories such that each ant visits separate parts of the 17 surrounding (unknown) space. In this third of three papers, we find experimental evidence for an 18 externalised spatial memory in Temnothorax albipennis ants: chemical markers (either pheromones 19 or other cues such as cuticular hydrocarbon footprints) that are used by nestmates to mark explored 20 space.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Term Response of Ants to the Removal of Ground Cover in Organic Olive Orchards
    Eur. J. Entomol. 108: 417–423, 2011 http://www.eje.cz/scripts/viewabstract.php?abstract=1632 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Short term response of ants to the removal of ground cover in organic olive orchards MERCEDES CAMPOS1, LUISA FERNÁNDEZ1, FRANCISCA RUANO3, BELÉN COTES1, MANUEL CÁRDENAS1 and JUAN CASTRO2 1Department of Environmental Protection, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, (CSIC) C/Profesor Albareda n° 1, 18008 – Granada, Spain; e-mail: [email protected] 2IFAPA Centro Camino de Purchil, CAP (Junta de Andalucia), P.O. Box 2027, 18080 – Granada, Spain 3Department of Animal Biology, University of Granada, 18071 – Granada, Spain Key words. Hymenoptera, Formicidae, disturbance, biodiversity, soil management Abstract. Ants are the most abundant group of soil arthropods in olive groves where they are involved in various trophic relation- ships of great importance for crops. The system of soil management is one agricultural practice that has a great effect on ants, so the objective of this study was to compare ant populations in organic olive orchards with a ground cover of natural vegetation and others where this natural vegetation is mechanically removed at the beginning of June. Ants were sampled using pitfall traps at 14, 30, 70 and 90 days after the removal of the ground vegetation. Overall, ant biodiversity did not change. However, changes were observed in the abundance of ant species, in particular, in those species that build shallow nests in the soil, both between the rows of trees and under the canopy of olive trees. In contrast, deep nesting species, such as Messor barbarus, were not affected.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Collection by Cataglyphis Iberica (EM.) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)
    POLSKA AKADEMIA NAUK INSTYTUT ZOOLOGII ANNALES ZOOLOGICI Tom 41 Warszawa, 30 V 1988 Nr 18 Xim Cerd A Food collection byCałaglyphis iberica (Em.) (Hyrnenoptera, Formicidae) [With 3 figures and 3 tables im the text] A bstract. CataglypMs iberica is an ant that lives in hot dry places and forages individually. Its staple food are arthropods, mainly insects. The range of food items taken by the workers was determined using two methods: the analysis of the remains found in the middens of the nests and that of the prey brought by the foragers. Even though the main groups that make up the diet are the same in both cases (ants, Coleoptera, Hemiptera), there are some differences because the soft prey (Orthoptera, Diptera, larvae) is more scarce in the middens. INTRODUCTION CataglypMs iberica (Emery , 1906) is an endemic species of the Iberian Peninsula and its distribution area is limited to Spain and Portugal (C olling - wood and Y arrow 1969). So far studies have been carried out on the forag­ ing activity (de H aro 1982, 1983, C erda 1986) and on the social carrying between nests (de H aro 1981, 1983, de H aro and C erda 1984, C erda 1986). As a new step to the understanding of the ecology of this species, the present work deals with the dietary spectrum. CataglypMs iberica nests in very dry locations, characteristically very sunny and with scant vegetation. Usually the societies are monogynic and polycalic (with several nests related by social carrying and only one of wich has a queen) (de H aro and C erda 1984).
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Wood Ants of the UK
    Guide to the Wood Ants of the UK and related species © Stewart Taylor © Stewart Taylor Wood Ants of the UK This guide is aimed at anyone who wants to learn more about mound-building woodland ants in the UK and how to identify the three ‘true’ Wood Ant species: Southern Red Wood Ant, Scottish Wood Ant and Hairy Wood Ant. The Blood-red Ant and Narrow-headed Ant (which overlap with the Wood Ants in their appearance, habitat and range) are also included here. The Shining Guest Ant is dependent on Wood Ants for survival so is included in this guide to raise awareness of this tiny and overlooked species. A further related species, Formica pratensis is not included in this guide. It has been considered extinct on mainland Britain since 2005 and is now only found on Jersey and Guernsey in the British Isles. Funding by CLIF, National Parks Protectors Published by the Cairngorms National Park Authority © CNPA 2021. All rights reserved. Contents What are Wood Ants? 02 Why are they important? 04 The Wood Ant calendar 05 Colony establishment and life cycle 06 Scottish Wood Ant 08 Hairy Wood Ant 09 Southern Red Wood Ant 10 Blood-red Ant 11 Narrow-headed Ant 12 Shining Guest Ant 13 Comparison between Shining Guest Ant and Slender Ant 14 Where to find Wood Ants 15 Nest mounds 18 Species distributions 19 Managing habitat for wood ants 22 Survey techniques and monitoring 25 Recording Wood Ants 26 Conservation status of Wood Ants 27 Further information 28 01 What are Wood Ants? Wood Ants are large, red and brown-black ants and in Europe most species live in woodland habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Actes Des Colloques Insectes Sociaux
    U 2 I 0 E 0 I 2 S ACTES DES COLLOQUES INSECTES SOCIAUX Edité par l'Union Internationale pour l’Etude des Insectes Sociaux - Section française (sous la direction de François-Xavier DECHAUME MONCHARMONT et Minh-Hà PHAM-DELEGUE) VOL. 15 (2002) – COMPTE RENDU DU COLLOQUE ANNUEL 50e anniversaire - Versailles - 16-18 septembre 2002 ACTES DES COLLOQUES INSECTES SOCIAUX Edité par l'Union Internationale pour l’Etude des Insectes Sociaux - Section française (sous la direction de François-Xavier DECHAUME MONCHARMONT et Minh-Hà PHAM-DELEGUE) VOL. 15 (2002) – COMPTE RENDU DU COLLOQUE ANNUEL 50e anniversaire - Versailles - 16-18 septembre 2002 ISSN n° 0265-0076 ISBN n° 2-905272-14-7 Composé au Laboratoire de Neurobiologie Comparée des Invertébrés (INRA, Bures-sur-Yvette) Publié on-line sur le site des Insectes Sociaux : : http://www.univ-tours.fr/desco/UIEIS/UIEIS.htm Comité Scientifique : Martin GIURFA Université Toulouse Alain LENOIR Université Tours Christian PEETERS CNRS Paris 6 Minh-Hà PHAM-DELEGUE INRA Bures Comité d'Organisation : Evelyne GENECQUE F.X. DECHAUME MONCHARMONT Et toute l’équipe du LNCI (INRA Bures) Nous remercions sincèrement l’INRA et l’établissement THOMAS qui ont soutenu financièrement cette manifestation. Crédits Photographiques Couverture : 1. Abeille : Serge CARRE (INRA) 2. Fourmis : Photothèque CNRS 3. Termite : Alain ROBERT (Université de Bourgogne, Dijon) UIEIS Versailles Page 1 Programme UNION INTERNATIONALE POUR L’ETUDE DES INSECTES SOCIAUX UIEIS Section Française - 50ème Anniversaire Versailles 16-18 Septembre 2002 PROGRAMME Lundi 16 septembre 9 h ACCUEIL DES PARTICIPANTS - CAFE 10 h Présentation du Centre INRA de Versailles – Président du Centre Session Plasticité et Socialité- Modérateur Martin Giurfa 10 h 15 - Conférence Watching the bee brain when it learns – Randolf Menzel (Université Libre de Berlin) 11 h 15 Calcium responses to queen pheromones, social pheromones and plant odours in the antennal lobe of the honey bee drone Apis mellifera L.
    [Show full text]
  • Trees Increase Ant Species Richness and Change Community Composition in Iberian Oak Savannahs
    diversity Article Trees Increase Ant Species Richness and Change Community Composition in Iberian Oak Savannahs Álvaro Gaytán 1,* , José L. Bautista 2, Raúl Bonal 2,3 , Gerardo Moreno 2 and Guillermo González-Bornay 2 1 Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, 114-18 Stockholm, Sweden 2 Grupo de investigación Forestal, INDEHESA, University of Extremadura, 10600 Plasencia, Spain; [email protected] (J.L.B.); [email protected] (R.B.); [email protected] (G.M.); [email protected] (G.G.-B.) 3 Department of Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolution, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Iberian man-made oak savannahs (so called dehesas) are traditional silvopastoral systems with a high natural value. Scattered trees provide shelter and additional food to livestock (cattle in our study sites), which also makes possible for animals depending on trees in a grass-dominated landscape to be present. We compared dehesas with nearby treeless grasslands to assess the effects of oaks on ant communities. Formica subrufa, a species associated with decayed wood, was by far the most abundant species, especially in savannahs. Taxa specialized in warm habitats were the most common both in dehesas and grasslands, as expected in areas with a Mediterranean climate. Within dehesas, the number of species was higher below oak canopies than outside tree cover. Compared to treeless grasslands, the presence of oaks resulted in a higher species richness of aphid-herding and predator ants, probably because trees offer shelter and resources to predators. The presence Citation: Gaytán, Á.; Bautista, J.L.; of oaks changed also the species composition, which differed between grasslands and dehesas.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae): Distribution, Conservation and Functional Relationships
    Irish Ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae): Distribution, Conservation and Functional Relationships Submitted by: Dipl. Biol. Robin Niechoj Supervisor: Prof. John Breen Submitted in accordance with the academic requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy to the Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Limerick Limerick, April 2011 Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis and that it has not been submitted for any other academic award. References and acknowledgements have been made, where necessary, to the work of others. Signature: Date: Robin Niechoj Department of Life Sciences Faculty of Science and Engineering University of Limerick ii Acknowledgements/Danksagung I wish to thank: Dr. John Breen for his supervision, encouragement and patience throughout the past 5 years. His infectious positive attitude towards both work and life was and always will be appreciated. Dr. Kenneth Byrne and Dr. Mogens Nielsen for accepting to examine this thesis, all the CréBeo team for advice, corrections of the report and Dr. Olaf Schmidt (also) for verification of the earthworm identification, Dr. Siobhán Jordan and her team for elemental analyses, Maria Long and Emma Glanville (NPWS) for advice, Catherine Elder for all her support, including fieldwork and proof reading, Dr. Patricia O’Flaherty and John O’Donovan for help with the proof reading, Robert Hutchinson for his help with the freeze-drying, and last but not least all the staff and postgraduate students of the Department of Life Sciences for their contribution to my work. Ich möchte mich bedanken bei: Katrin Wagner für ihre Hilfe im Labor, sowie ihre Worte der Motivation.
    [Show full text]
  • Division of Labour Promotes the Spread of Information in Colony Emigrations by the Ant Temnothorax Rugatulus
    Division of labour promotes the spread royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rspb of information in colony emigrations by the ant Temnothorax rugatulus Gabriele Valentini1,2, Naoki Masuda7,8, Zachary Shaffer2, Jake R. Hanson1,3, Research Takao Sasaki9, Sara Imari Walker1,3,4, Theodore P. Pavlic2,3,4,5,6 Cite this article: Valentini G, Masuda N, and Stephen C. Pratt2 Shaffer Z, Hanson JR, Sasaki T, Walker SI, Pavlic 1School of Earth and Space Exploration, 2School of Life Sciences, 3Beyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in TP, Pratt SC. 2020 Division of labour promotes Science, 4ASU–SFI Center for Biosocial Complex Systems, 5School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision the spread of information in colony Systems Engineering, and 6School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA emigrations by the ant Temnothorax rugatulus. 7Department of Mathematics, and 8Computational and Data-Enabled Science and Engineering Program, Proc. R. Soc. B 287: 20192950. University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA 9Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.2950 GV, 0000-0002-8961-3211; TS, 0000-0001-7923-9855; SCP, 0000-0002-1086-4019 The fitness of group-living animals often depends on how well members Received: 19 December 2019 share information needed for collective decision-making. Theoretical studies have shown that collective choices can emerge in a homogeneous group of Accepted: 6 March 2020 individuals following identical rules, but real animals show much evidence for heterogeneity in the degree and nature of their contribution to group decisions. In social insects, for example, the transmission and processing of information is influenced by a well-organized division of labour.
    [Show full text]
  • Worker-Behavior and Behavior-Behavior Interaction
    ISSN 1997-3500 Myrmecological News myrmecologicalnews.org Myrmecol. News 31: 115-132 doi: 10.25849/myrmecol.news_031:115 14 April 2021 Original Article Worker-behavior and behavior-behavior interaction networks in the trap-jaw ant Odontomachus chelifer (Latreille, 1802) (Hymeno ptera: Formicidae) Felipe Marcel Neves, Marcelo Eduardo Borges & Marcio R. Pie Abstract Division of labor is among the main factors to explain the evolutionary success of social systems, from the origins of multi- cellularity to complex animal societies. The remarkable ecological success of social insects seems to have been largely driven by ergonomic advantages stemming from the behavioral specialization of workers. However, little is known about how individuals and their corresponding behavioral repertoires are related to each other within a division-of-labor context, particularly by viewing such relationships as complex networks. Applications of network theory to the study of social insects are almost exclusively used to analyze behavioral interactions between individuals rather than to the study of relations among individuals and behaviors. Here, we use an approach to the study of the organization of the behavioral repertoire of ant colonies that considers both individual-behavior interactions and behavior-behavior interactions, besides colony time budgets. Our study investigates the organization of division of labor in colonies of the trap-jaw ant Odontomachus chelifer (Latreille, 1802). All the behavioral acts (including inactivity) performed within three queenright colonies of different sizes (n = 7, 30, and 60 workers) were studied under controlled laboratory conditions. Each ant was individually marked and observed by scan sampling in 10 min intervals for 10 h each (n = 5919 behavioral acts).
    [Show full text]