DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction Singapore Is a Multiracial Society with Different Races Coexisting in Peace

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Social Security study guide SMC 2018: Multiculturalism SOCIAL SECURITY COUNCIL Learning Outcomes Students should be aware of the importance of multiculturalism in Singapore’s context and how care must be taken to preserve the social fabric. The discussion will centre on the need to protect Singapore’s social cohesion in the midst of heightened worldwide and regional tensions along racial and religious fault lines and increasing radicalism. [Topic 1: A discussion of the Reserved Presidential Election] Introduction Singapore is a multiracial society with different races coexisting in peace. Table 11 shows the make-up of ethnic groups in Singapore 1 "STATISTICS SINGAPORE - Population Trends 2017 - SingStat." Accessed February 11, 2018. http://www.singstat.gov.sg/docs/default-source/default-document- library/publications/publications_and_papers/population_and_population_structure/population2017.pdf. 1 Social Security study guide SMC 2018: Multiculturalism With such a diversity of races, the interests of minority and equal representation is paramount to ensure races can live in harmony.2 The President of Singapore is the Head of State and symbol of the nation. Tasked3 with representing all Singaporeans on the global stage and maintaining healthy bilateral relationships with other countries, the President is more than just a figurehead. The President also serves as the financial backbone of the country as he/she holds the key to the reserves of the country and the right to veto national reserves expenditure. For such an important job, Singapore needs to ensure the President elect is the most suitable for the job. Thus, certain qualifications have to be met before potential candidates can run for presidency. These guidelines ensure the candidates are experienced in dealing with large amount of reserves and ties in strongly with Singapore’s long-held belief in meritocracy. However, concerns of insufficient representation of minority groups due to the racial background of past Presidents led to the implementation of reserved presidency. As seen in the table below, Singapore has not elected a Malay President since 1971. 2 "To preserve social harmony, Singapore has racial requirements for its ...." Accessed February 11, 2018. https://qz.com/908967/to-preserve-social-harmony-singapore-has-racial-requirements-for-its-next- president/. 3 "Roles and Responsibilities | The Istana." Accessed February 11, 2018. http://www.istana.gov.sg/roles- and-responsibilities. 2 Social Security study guide SMC 2018: Multiculturalism Past Presidents’ Tenure 4 1971- 1981 Benjamin Henry Sheares Eurasian 1981-1985 Chengara Veetil Devan Nair Indian 1985-1993 Wee Kim Wee Indian 1993-1999 Ong Teng Cheong Chinese 1999-2011 Sellapan Ramanathan (S.R. Indian Nathan) 2011-2017 Tony Tan Keng Yam Chinese 2017-present Halimah Yacob Malay Oxford Research shows that racial minorities who remain politically inactive usually use controversial forms of political actions and show greater support for oppositions parties to promote their political interests.5 Thus, it is important to ensure that the minority races are politically active so as to maintain peace and stability in the country. Under the new system implemented 1 April 2017, the Presidential Election is reserved for a community in Singapore if no one from that community has been President for any of the five most recent terms of office of the President. There are 4 communities namely, Chinese, Malay, Indian, Other minority communities6. 4 "Past and present leaders of Singapore | Infopedia - NLB eResources." Accessed February 11, 2018. http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/infopedia/articles/SIP_139_2005-01-19.html. 5 "Race, Ethnicity, and Political Behavior - Oxford Research ...." Accessed February 11, 2018. http://politics.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e- 238. 6 "Singapore Elections Department - Presidential Elections." Accessed February 11, 2018. http://www.eld.gov.sg/elections_presidential.html. 3 Social Security study guide SMC 2018: Multiculturalism This move has sparked controversy and questions over its effect on racial harmony and meritocracy. Has the new system, which is aimed at ensuring multi-racial representation in the Presidency impinged on meritocracy? Does the new system promote racial harmony? Historical background Before Singapore gained independence from Malaysia, it had a Yang-di Pertuan Negara or Head of State. In 1965, after its separation from the Federation of Malaysia, the Republic of Singapore replaced the office of Yang-di Pertuan Negara with that of a President. The Constitution was amended and the title of the “Head of State” was changed to “President”. Before 1993, the President was elected by the Parliament. The President had limited powers, which allowed him/her to appoint the Prime Minister, Ministers and to dissolve the Parliament. From 1965 to 1993, Parliament sought ways to change the rules governing the powers of the President to suit the needs of a young, developing nation. The diversity of ethnicities in Singapore, the political leadership of Mr Lee Kuan Yew and the personalities of our Presidents during that period were some factors that shaped the evolution of the office of our President. 7 After two White Papers, the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore (Amendment No 3) Bill to provide for an elected President was tabled in Parliament on 4 October 1990 and passed on 3rd January 1991. 8 7 Managing Political Change in Singapore: The Elected Presidency - pages 9 and 10 8 "White Paper on the Elected President scheme is ... - NLB eResources." Accessed December 26, 2017. http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/history/events/daaeb1c5-ce75-420f-a26c-37378bb70461. 4 Social Security study guide SMC 2018: Multiculturalism In 1991, the legislation for Elected Presidency was passed. The amended powers allowed the President to veto key civil appointments and the use of the country’s reserves. The powers of an Elected President was first exercised by the then President Wee Kim Wee. Our first Elected President was Mr Ong Teng Cheong, a former cabinet minister, who took office in 1993. 9 After the Elected Presidency policy, Singapore has passed the legislation for the Reserved Presidential Election. The Reserved Presidential Election is a step towards building a stronger multiracial society. When talking about his motivations for the Reserved Presidency, PM Lee Hsien Loong said that Singapore has "not yet arrived at an ideal state of accepting people of a different race" and cited recent surveys to show that "we are not completely colour-blind". He further commented that it would be harder for a candidate of minority race to win an open election against a Chinese candidate. He believes that "These are the realities we have to manage”.He acknowledges that while the Reserved Presidency would not be sufficient to bring about the change in society, it would most certainly be a step towards it and a good representation of our principles and strong will to build a multiracial society. 10 9 "Elected presidency | Infopedia - NLB eResources - National Library." Accessed December 26, 2017. http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/infopedia/articles/SIP_899_2004-12-24.html. 10 Yuen-C, Tham. "PM Lee spells out why he pushed for reserved election." The Straits Times. September 29, 2017. Accessed January 23, 2018. http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/pm-lee-spells- out-why-he-pushed-for-reserved-election. 5 Social Security study guide SMC 2018: Multiculturalism Current situation Most recently, on 9th November 2016, an amendment that affected Article 19 of the Constitution was passed. 11 The changes were made with regards to the qualifying criteria of the Presidential candidates. This included12: ❏ The candidate’s experience must meet the qualifying criteria within the 20 years immediately preceding the Nomination Day; and ❏ Specifying that candidates from the private sector must have served as the chief executive officer for a minimum of three years, of a company with at least S$500 million in shareholders’ equity; and ❏ Reserving elections for a candidate from a certain racial group should that group have not occupied the President’s office for 5 or more consecutive terms. In 2017, under the new system, Halimah Yacob became the President in a walkover election. This has, however, caused controversies and raised questions. This walkover happened in spite of 5 people applying for the certificate of eligibility 13. Three applied for Malay community certificate, one for Chinese community certificate and one person declared himself not a member of any of the communities. However, only Halimah Yacob qualified which led to her walkover victory. 11 "Elected presidency | Infopedia - NLB eResources - National Library." Accessed December 26, 2017. http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/infopedia/articles/SIP_899_2004-12-24.html. 12 "Elected presidency | Infopedia - NLB eResources - National Library." Accessed February 11, 2018. http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/infopedia/articles/SIP_899_2004-12-24.html. 13 "Presidential election 2017: Five people applied for certificate of ...." Accessed December 26, 2017. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/presidential-election-2017-five-people-applied-for- certificate-9184184. 6 Social Security study guide SMC 2018: Multiculturalism The elections was not without controversy as there were confusion over the official race of Halimah Yacob. Some believed that she was of Indian descent and thus should be considered Indian. However, she was quoted as saying
Recommended publications
  • ASA 36/07/94 Distr: UA/SC UA 256/94

    ASA 36/07/94 Distr: UA/SC UA 256/94

    EXTERNAL (for general distribution) AI Index: ASA 36/07/94 Distr: UA/SC UA 256/94 Death Penalty 4 July 1994 SINGAPORE Jasbir SINGH, aged 30 Charanjit SINGH, age not known On 14 February 1994 the Court of Criminal Appeal rejected the appeal of Jasbir Singh and Charanjit Singh against their sentence of death for trafficking in 254.36 grams of diamorphine. Jasbir and Charanjit were arrested on 24 May 1988 on charges of drug trafficking. Jasbir had been staying at the flat of an acquaintance who was away on holiday. There he found a bag of powder and was arrested while trying to determine the nature of this powder. Jasbir had asked his friend Charanjit to accompany him. Both were tried and sentenced to death on 5 January 1993. They will now file an appeal for clemency with the President of Singapore, Ong Teng Cheong. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The death penalty was employed during the colonial period and was retained after Singapore became an independent republic in August 1965. Anyone found in possession of more than 15 grams of heroin, 30 grams of morphine, 30 grams of cocaine or 500 grams of cannabis is presumed guilty of drug trafficking and is liable to a mandatory death sentence. Amnesty International opposes the death penalty in all cases as a violation of the right to life and the right not to be subjected to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, as proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Please send telegrams/telexes/faxes/express and airmail letters either in English or in your own language: - expressing concern at the imposition of the death sentence on Jasbir Singh and Charanjit Singh; - stating Amnesty International's unconditional opposition to the death penalty.
  • Parliamentary Debates Singapore Official Report

    Parliamentary Debates Singapore Official Report

    Volume 94 Monday No 21 11 July 2016 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES SINGAPORE OFFICIAL REPORT CONTENTS Written Answers to Questions Page 1. Posting of Job Openings in Public Service on National Jobs Bank (Mr Patrick Tay Teck Guan) 1 2. Plans for Wider Use of Automated Vehicle Systems in Transport System (Dr Lim Wee Kiak) 1 3. Statistics on Malaysian Cars Entering and Leaving Singapore and Traffic Offences Committed (Mr Low Thia Khiang) 2 4. Erection of Noise Barriers between Chua Chu Kang and Bukit Gombak MRT Stations (Mr Zaqy Mohamad) 2 5. Need for Pram-friendly Buses (Mr Desmond Choo) 3 6. Review of Need for Inspection of New Cars from Third Year Onwards (Mr Ang Hin Kee) 3 7. Number of Female Bus Captains Employed by Public Bus Operators (Mr Melvin Yong Yik Chye) 4 8. Green-Man Plus Scheme at Pedestrian Crossing along Potong Pasir Avenue 1 (Mr Sitoh Yih Pin) 5 9. Determination of COE Quota for Category D Vehicles (Mr Thomas Chua Kee Seng) 5 10. Taxi Stand in Vicinity of Blocks 216 to 222 at Lorong 8 Toa Payoh (Mr Sitoh Yih Pin) 6 11. Cyber Security Measures in Place at Key Installations and Critical Infrastructures (Mr Darryl David) 6 12. Government Expenditure on Advertisements and Sponsored Posts on Online Media Platforms (Mr Dennis Tan Lip Fong) 7 13. Regulars, NSmen and NSFs Diagnosed with Mental Health Problems (Mr Dennis Tan Lip Fong) 7 14. Involvement of Phone Scam Suspects Arrested Overseas in Phone Scams in Singapore (Mr Gan Thiam Poh) 8 15. Deployment of Auxiliary Police Officers and CCTVs at Liquor Control Zone in Little India (Mr Melvin Yong Yik Chye) 9 16.
  • Full Version of Cv

    Full Version of Cv

    Adrian David Cheok AM Phone: +61423977539 or +60128791271 19A Robe Terrace Email: [email protected] Medindie, 5081 Homepage: https://www.adriancheok.info Australia https://www.imagineeringinstitute.org Personal Date of Birth: December 18, 1971. Place of birth: Adelaide, Australia Australian Citizen. Summary of Career Adrian David Cheok AM is Director of the Imagineering Institute, Malaysia, Full Professor at i-University Tokyo, Visiting Professor at Raffles University, Malaysia, Visiting Professor at University of Novi Sad-Serbia, on Technical faculty \Mihailo Pupin", Serbia, Faculty of Ducere Business School, and CEO of Nikola Tesla Technologies Corporation. He is Founder and Director of the Mixed Reality Lab, Singapore. He was formerly Professor of Pervasive Computing, University of London, Full Professor and Executive Dean at Keio University, Graduate School of Media Design and Associate Professor in the National University of Singapore. He has previously worked in real-time systems, soft computing, and embedded computing in Mitsubishi Electric Research Labs, Japan. In 2019, The Governor General of Australia, Representative of Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth II, has awarded Australia's highest honour the Order of Australia to Adrian David Cheok for his contribution to international education and research. He has been working on research covering mixed reality, human-computer interfaces, wearable computers and ubiquitous computing, fuzzy systems, embedded systems, power electronics. He has successfully obtained approximately $130 million dollars in funding for externally funded projects in the area of wearable computers and mixed reality from Daiwa Foundation, Khazanah National (Malaysian Government), Media Development Authority, Nike, National Oilwell Varco, Defence Science Technology Agency, Ministry of Defence, Ministry of Communications and Arts, National Arts Council, Singapore Sci- ence Center, and Hougang Primary School.
  • Institutionalized Leadership: Resilient Hegemonic Party Autocracy in Singapore

    Institutionalized Leadership: Resilient Hegemonic Party Autocracy in Singapore

    Institutionalized Leadership: Resilient Hegemonic Party Autocracy in Singapore By Netina Tan PhD Candidate Political Science Department University of British Columbia Paper prepared for presentation at CPSA Conference, 28 May 2009 Ottawa, Ontario Work- in-progress, please do not cite without author’s permission. All comments welcomed, please contact author at [email protected] Abstract In the age of democracy, the resilience of Singapore’s hegemonic party autocracy is puzzling. The People’s Action Party (PAP) has defied the “third wave”, withstood economic crises and ruled uninterrupted for more than five decades. Will the PAP remain a deviant case and survive the passing of its founding leader, Lee Kuan Yew? Building on an emerging scholarship on electoral authoritarianism and the concept of institutionalization, this paper argues that the resilience of hegemonic party autocracy depends more on institutions than coercion, charisma or ideological commitment. Institutionalized parties in electoral autocracies have a greater chance of survival, just like those in electoral democracies. With an institutionalized leadership succession system to ensure self-renewal and elite cohesion, this paper contends that PAP will continue to rule Singapore in the post-Lee era. 2 “All parties must institutionalize to a certain extent in order to survive” Angelo Panebianco (1988, 54) Introduction In the age of democracy, the resilience of Singapore’s hegemonic party regime1 is puzzling (Haas 1999). A small island with less than 4.6 million population, Singapore is the wealthiest non-oil producing country in the world that is not a democracy.2 Despite its affluence and ideal socio- economic prerequisites for democracy, the country has been under the rule of one party, the People’s Action Party (PAP) for the last five decades.
  • OFFICIAL NAME: Republic of Singapore

    OFFICIAL NAME: Republic of Singapore

    OFFICIAL NAME: Republic of Singapore CAPITAL: Singapore SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT: Unitary Multiparty Republic AREA: 620 Sq Km (239 Sq Mi) ESTIMATED 2000 POPULATION: 3,109,000 LOCATION & GEOGRAPHY: Singapore is located on the Malay Peninsula in South East Asia. The territory consists of the island of Singapore and around 50 adjacent islands. The country is separated physically from Malaysia by the Johore Strait and from Indonesia by the Strait of Malacca as well as the Strait of Singapore. The islands are generally flat and low with a few small cliffs and shallow valleys to the southwest. The main island is drained by a number of short streams such as the Singapore, Jurong, Kalang, Kranji, Seletar and Serangoon. Land Use; forested 5%, pastures and agricultural-cultivated 1%, urban and other 94% (1993). CLIMATE: Singapore has a tropical climate characterized by hot and humid conditions. Rainfall is distributed evenly throughout the year with an average annual precipitation of 2,410 mm (95 inches). During the NE Monsoon, floods are common while the SW Monsoon usually brings violent wind squalls called Sumatras. Average temperature ranges are between 24 degrees Celsius (75 degrees Fahrenheit) to 32 degrees Celsius (90 degrees Fahrenheit) all year. PEOPLE: The Singaporeans are of three major ethnic groups. (1.) The Chinese who account for around 78% of the population, (2.) the Malays who account for 14% and (3.) the Indians who account for 7% of the population. DEMOGRAPHIC/VITAL STATISTICS: Density; 4,371 persons per sq km (11,329 persons per sq mi) (1991). Urban-Rural; 100.0% urban, 0.0% rural (1991).
  • One Party Dominance Survival: the Case of Singapore and Taiwan

    One Party Dominance Survival: the Case of Singapore and Taiwan

    One Party Dominance Survival: The Case of Singapore and Taiwan DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Lan Hu Graduate Program in Political Science The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Professor R. William Liddle Professor Jeremy Wallace Professor Marcus Kurtz Copyrighted by Lan Hu 2011 Abstract Can a one-party-dominant authoritarian regime survive in a modernized society? Why is it that some survive while others fail? Singapore and Taiwan provide comparable cases to partially explain this puzzle. Both countries share many similar cultural and developmental backgrounds. One-party dominance in Taiwan failed in the 1980s when Taiwan became modern. But in Singapore, the one-party regime survived the opposition’s challenges in the 1960s and has remained stable since then. There are few comparative studies of these two countries. Through empirical studies of the two cases, I conclude that regime structure, i.e., clientelistic versus professional structure, affects the chances of authoritarian survival after the society becomes modern. This conclusion is derived from a two-country comparative study. Further research is necessary to test if the same conclusion can be applied to other cases. This research contributes to the understanding of one-party-dominant regimes in modernizing societies. ii Dedication Dedicated to the Lord, Jesus Christ. “Counsel and sound judgment are mine; I have insight, I have power. By Me kings reign and rulers issue decrees that are just; by Me princes govern, and nobles—all who rule on earth.” Proverbs 8:14-16 iii Acknowledgments I thank my committee members Professor R.
  • Parliament Sitting Date: 17 Aug 1999 ISSUES RAISED by PRESIDENT

    Parliament Sitting Date: 17 Aug 1999 ISSUES RAISED by PRESIDENT

    Parliament Sitting Date: 17 Aug 1999 ISSUES RAISED BY PRESIDENT ONG TENG CHEONG AT HIS PRESS CONFERENCE ON 16TH JULY 1999 (Parliamentary Q&As) Mr Jeyaretnam: May I ask the Prime Minister a question or two? I understood him to say that the Cabinet would have been happier if the President had decided to seek re-election. But the Cabinet was concerned whether he was medically capable. But the President had said in his statement that his doctors had given him a clean bill, that his cancer was in complete remission and the President clearly indicated that his health would not stand in the way of his becoming President. May I ask the Prime Minister to explain to this House on what basis or information did the Cabinet conclude that he would not be capable of discharging his duties? Mr Goh Chok Tong: Mr Speaker, Sir, yes, the President had told the public at his press conference regarding his present health situation. But the Cabinet had two medical reports, one from the President's doctor in the United States, Dr Saul Rosenberg, and the other from his physician in Singapore. We studied the reports and it was quite clear from the reports that if you should focus or project the President's health condition into the future, there was a very strong likelihood that he would not be able to perform his duties normally. In a sense, it is like looking at a glass of water, whether it is one-third full or two-thirds empty. The Cabinet had to take the advice of the doctor and take a very careful view of what the President's future condition would be like.
  • Cultural Policy in Singapore: Negotiating Economic and Socio-Cultural Agendas1

    Cultural Policy in Singapore: Negotiating Economic and Socio-Cultural Agendas1

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarBank@NUS CULTURAL POLICY IN SINGAPORE: NEGOTIATING ECONOMIC AND SOCIO-CULTURAL AGENDAS1 Lily Kong Associate Professor Department of Geography National University of Singapore Kent Ridge Singapore 119260 Email: [email protected] Fax: 65-7773091 Revised manuscript submitted to Geoforum For Special Issue on “Culture, Economy, Policy” July 1999 Post-print version Published as: Kong, L., (2000) "Cultural policy in Singapore: Negotiating economic and socio-cultural agendas". Geoforum, 31, no. 4 (Special Issue on Culture Industries and Cultural Policy): 409-424. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718500000063 1 This paper was written while I was Visiting Fellow at the Institute of Oriental Culture, Tokyo University. I would like to record thanks to Assoc Prof Tong Chee Kiong for facilitating my attachment at the Institute of Oriental Culture. I am also grateful to Professor Takeshi Hamashita for taking time off his extremely busy schedule to extend hospitality. Thanks are also due to the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for financing the fellowship and the National University of Singapore (NUS) for the travel grant. 1 CULTURAL POLICY IN SINGAPORE: NEGOTIATING ECONOMIC AND SOCIO-CULTURAL AGENDAS INTRODUCTION At the opening of a local conference titled “Art versus Art: Conflict and Convergence” in 1993, Ho Kwon Ping, Chairman of the Practice Performing Arts Centre, a private arts school, made the following observation about the increased attention paid to the arts in Singapore in the late 1980s and 1990s: We are moving so very rapidly in a national effort to change this underdeveloped state in the Arts.
  • Engaging Religion with Pragmatism

    Engaging Religion with Pragmatism

    The RSIS Working Paper series presents papers in a preliminary form and serves to stimulate comment and discussion. The views expressed in this publication are entirely those of the author(s), and do not represent the official position of RSIS. This publication may be reproduced electronically or in print with prior written permission obtained from RSIS and due credit given to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email [email protected] for further editorial queries. NO. 305 ENGAGING RELIGION WITH PRAGMATISM THE SINGAPORE STATE’S MANAGEMENT OF SOCIAL ISSUES AND RELIGIOUS TENSIONS IN THE 1980s MOHAMMAD ALAMI MUSA S. RAJARATNAM SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES SINGAPORE 21 AUGUST 2017 About the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies The S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS) was established in January 2007 as an autonomous school within the Nanyang Technological University. Known earlier as the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies when it was established in July 1996, RSIS’ mission is to be a leading research and graduate teaching institution in strategic and international affairs in the Asia Pacific. To accomplish this mission, it will: Provide a rigorous professional graduate education with a strong practical emphasis Conduct policy-relevant research in defence, national security, international relations, strategic studies and diplomacy Foster a global network of like-minded professional schools Graduate Programmes RSIS offers a challenging graduate education in international affairs, taught by an international faculty of leading thinkers and practitioners. The Master of Science degree programmes in Strategic Studies, International Relations, Asian Studies, and International Political Economy are distinguished by their focus on the Asia Pacific, the professional practice of international affairs, and the cultivation of academic depth.
  • Votes and Proceedings of the Thirteenth Parliament of Singapore

    Votes and Proceedings of the Thirteenth Parliament of Singapore

    VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTEENTH PARLIAMENT OF SINGAPORE Second Session WEDNESDAY, 25 MARCH 2020 No. 127 1.30 pm 1 PRESENT: Mr SPEAKER (Mr Tan Chuan-Jin (Marine Parade)). Mr AMRIN AMIN (Sembawang), Senior Parliamentary Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and Ministry of Health. Mr ANG HIN KEE (Ang Mo Kio). Mr ANG WEI NENG (Jurong). Mr BAEY YAM KENG (Tampines), Senior Parliamentary Secretary, Ministry of Transport and Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth. Miss CHERYL CHAN WEI LING (Fengshan). Mr CHAN CHUN SING (Tanjong Pagar), Minister for Trade and Industry. Mr CHEE HONG TAT (Bishan-Toa Payoh), Senior Minister of State, Ministry of Trade and Industry and Ministry of Education. Miss CHENG LI HUI (Tampines). Dr CHIA SHI-LU (Tanjong Pagar). Mr CHONG KEE HIONG (Bishan-Toa Payoh). Mr DESMOND CHOO (Tampines). Mr DARRYL DAVID (Ang Mo Kio). Mr CHRISTOPHER DE SOUZA (Holland-Bukit Timah). Mr ARASU DURAISAMY (Nominated Member). Mr CEDRIC FOO CHEE KENG (Pioneer). Mr DOUGLAS FOO (Nominated Member). Ms FOO MEE HAR (West Coast). No. 127 25 MARCH 2020 2 Ms GRACE FU HAI YIEN (Yuhua), Minister for Culture, Community and Youth and Leader of the House. Mr GAN KIM YONG (Chua Chu Kang), Minister for Health. Mr GAN THIAM POH (Ang Mo Kio). Mr GOH CHOK TONG (Marine Parade). Mr HENG CHEE HOW (Jalan Besar), Senior Minister of State, Ministry of Defence. Mr HENG SWEE KEAT (Tampines), Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance. Mr TERENCE HO WEE SAN (Nominated Member). Ms INDRANEE RAJAH (Tanjong Pagar), Minister, Prime Minister's Office, Second Minister for Finance and Second Minister for Education.
  • UA/SC UA 336/93 Death Penalty 22 September 1993 SINGAPORE

    UA/SC UA 336/93 Death Penalty 22 September 1993 SINGAPORE

    EXTERNAL (for general distribution) AI Index: ASA 36/05/93 Distr: UA/SC UA 336/93 Death Penalty 22 September 1993 SINGAPORE: Yeo Poh Choon, aged 26 ) all Yeo Choon Chau, aged 22, brother of Yeo Poh Choon ) Malaysian Lai Kim Loy, aged 26 ) nationals Tee Seh Ping, aged 25 ) Amnesty International is concerned that the four people named above may soon be executed. In July 1993, Choon Chau, Lai Kim Loy, and Tee Seh Ping were sentenced to death for drug trafficking by the Singapore High Court. They were arrested on 13 May 1991 for reportedly trying to sell about 200 grams of heroin to an undercover agent of the Central Narcotics Bureau. The Court of Criminal Appeal dismissed their appeals against conviction on Monday 13 September 1993. In the original trial Yeo Poh Choon was acquitted as the judge found that there was no evidence linking him to the heroin. However, at the Court of Criminal Appeal, the Deputy Public Prosecutor argued that there is no requirement in law that every conspirator must personally check and confirm the subject matter of a deal. The Court of Criminal Appeal quashed Yeo Poh Choon's acquittal and sentenced him to death for conspiracy to traffic drugs. Their only hope for clemency now lies with President Ong Teng Cheong who has the power to commute these sentences. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Amnesty International opposes the death penalty in all cases as a violation of the right to life and the right not to be subjected to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, as proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
  • Chinese Linguistic Environment and Education in Singapore Context

    Chinese Linguistic Environment and Education in Singapore Context

    Journal of Education and Learning; Vol. 5, No. 4; 2016 ISSN 1927-5250 E-ISSN 1927-5269 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education A Standalone but not Lonely Language: Chinese Linguistic Environment and Education in Singapore Context Huang Min1 & Cheng Kangdi2 1 College of International Studies, Southwest University, Chongqing, China 2 School of Foreign Languages and Literature, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China Correspondence: Huang Min, College of International Studies, Southwest University, Chongqing, China. Tel: 86-023-6822-1690. E-mail: [email protected] Received: July 9, 2016 Accepted: August 16, 2016 Online Published: October 11, 2016 doi:10.5539/jel.v5n4p221 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n4p221 Abstract Bilingual education policy in Singapore permits the students learn both English as working language and mother tongues, such as Chinese, as L2 anchoring to culture heritage. Starting from historical and sociolinguistic reasons, this paper is intended to provide a panoramic view of Chinese education in Singapore, clarify and compare Chinese education syllabi on different levels from primary schools to pre-university schools, cover social movement support on promoting Chinese learning and use in this multilingual society. Meanwhile, Singapore’s success in bilingual education cannot hide its own problems. The status of Chinese dialects, the competitive role of English, the rational and practicality for proficient bilingual users, the choice of teaching methodologies between L1 and L2, are all remaining open to further discussing and probing for language policy making and modification in the future. Keywords: Chinese, linguistic environment, education, Bilingual education, Singapore 1. Introduction Singapore, a multicultural and multilingual society since its inception as an independent country, is comprised of three major ethnic groups in the following relatively stable proportions: 75% Chinese, 13.7% Malay, 8.7% India and 2.6% others (Department of Statistics, 2008).