Cycling-Inclusive Policy Development: a Handbook April 2009
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
3E Car-Free Development
Division 44 Environment and Infrastructure Sector project "Transport Policy Advice" Sustainable Transport: A Sourcebook for Policy-makers in Developing Cities Module 3e Car-Free Development OVERVIEW OF THE SOURCEBOOK Sustainable Transport: A Sourcebook for Policy-Makers in Developing Cities What is the Sourcebook? Modules and contributors ThisSourcebook on Sustainable Urban Transport Sourcebook Overview and Cross-cutting Issues of addresses the key areas of a sustainable transport Urban Transport (GTZ) policy framework for a developing city. The Institutional and policy orientation Sourcebook consists of more than 20 modules. 1a. The Role of Transport in Urban Development Who is it for? Policy (Enrique Peñalosa) The Sourcebook is intended for policy-makers in 1b. Urban Transport Institutions (Richard Meakin) developing cities, and their advisors. This target 1c. Private Sector Participation in Transport Infra- audience is reflected in the content, which structure Provision provides policy tools appropriate for application (Christopher Zegras, MIT) in a range of developing cities. 1d. Economic Instruments How is it supposed to be used? (Manfred Breithaupt, GTZ) The Sourcebook can be used in a number of 1e. Raising Public Awareness about Sustainable ways. It should be kept in one location, and the Urban Transport (Karl Fjellstrom, GTZ) different modules provided to officials involved Land use planning and demand management in urban transport. The Sourcebook can be easily 2a. Land Use Planning and Urban Transport adapted to fit a formal short course training (Rudolf Petersen, Wuppertal Institute) event, or can serve as a guide for developing a 2b. Mobility Management (Todd Litman, VTPI) curriculum or other training program in the area of urban transport. -
Carbusters 31
How Do We Fix Our Cities? The Answer Is in the Right Questions alf of the world’s people now live in cities. To some, that is Today, cities are vile, dirty, dangerous places to live. Cars clog the Hdistressing news. Cities, after all, are crowded, noisy, crime- streets; their noise, fumes, and deadly mass fray nerves, choke the air, and ridden, and polluted. But many of those attributes of the urban run people under their wheels. But now citizens are taking action, experience can be attributed to the rampant proliferation of automobiles in demanding that cities be built for people, not cars. confined spaces better suited to people. We’re here to show you that And while it may seem an uphill battle, the answer to our cities’ woes another city is possible. might be as simple as asking the right questions. Two hundred years ago, cities were vile, dirty, dangerous places to live. Since the advent of the automobile, city planners, traffic engineers, and Features were open sewers and calls of Gardez-l’eau! from windows above, as government officials have been asking, “How do we keep the traffic buckets of excrement and slop were thrown down to the street. But then health flowing?” And by traffic, they meant cars. People sat idly by, stuck in jams, reformers dug sewer lines and after that indoor plumbing became standard. content to complain and leave the seeking of solutions to the experts. One hundred years ago, cities were vile, dirty, dangerous places to live. But now citizens and their representatives are waking up to the need for The industrial revolution packed cities tight with workers who came for jobs in new and more socially constructive questions: How do we create quality multiplying factories which belched unregulated filth into the air even as work public spaces? Where’s our public transportation? Why can’t we live, work, animals covered the streets with their own emissions. -
Open Letter to Siim Kallas, Transport Commissioner at the European Commission, and Matthias Ruete, Director-General of DG-MOVE
World Carfree Network, c/o Nadace Partneství, Krátká 26, 100 00 Praha 10, Czech Republic 7th. December 2012. Open letter to Siim Kallas, Transport Commissioner at the European Commission, and Matthias Ruete, Director-General of DG-MOVE Dear Mr. Kallas and Mr. Ruete, The World Carfree Network feels compelled to write to you with regard to the increasing number of cuts across the European railway system, and to international passenger routes in many parts of Europe in particular. Fewer, slower trains discourage rail use, especially when combined with the loss of network benefits such as through ticketing and good connections. The actions of one company can make many international journeys impractical to make by rail. These trends undermine the long-term EU policy aims of (i) supporting the single market by facilitating the seamless movement of goods and people, and (ii) promoting modal shift to rail for medium- and long-distance journeys. We ask you to act immediately to address the root causes of these problems at the strategic policy level, and by promoting cooperation and good practice dissemination. The EU must (i) increase the competitiveness of rail with other modes as an urgent priority, and (ii) review liberalisation and fragmentation policies that have led to ‘market failure’ and the consequent contraction of the international passenger train network. Rail is the safest mode of motorised surface transport in Europe, and also one of the least environmentally damaging. CO2 emissions per passenger km for rail are typically one quarter to one third of those of air and cars, and even less in countries with a greater proportion of electrified route kms and/or electricity generation from renewable sources.1 Railways connect wealth- generating city regions, expand labour markets, decongest the road network, facilitate sustainable tourism and can be major employers in their own right, while passengers can use travel time productively. -
IMPLEMENTING CSR: BEST PRACTICES by Smes and Bros
CSR_report_cover:Layout 1 8-06-2009 10:31 Pagina 1 This project is funded by the European Union IMPLEMENTING CSR: BEST PRACTICES BY SMEs AND BROs CNIPMMR BSP - IMPLEMENTING CSR: BEST PRACTICES BY SMEs BEST PRACTICES BSP - IMPLEMENTING CSR: AND BROs This programme is implemented by Confapi. This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. Business Support Programme for Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia and Turkey The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. 2008-2009 Business Support Programme for Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia and Turkey Promotion of Environmental Certifications and Corporate Social Responsibility towards EU legislation adoption and SMEs competitiveness Disclaimer: 1. Each author is responsible for the content of his/her own part 2. All information are updated until December 2008 Dissemination of Corporate Social Responsibility in new EU members and in candidate countries The EU enlargement process is also raising the issue of promoting CSR principles in the new member states and in candidate countries. This is actually the general objective of the European program “Business Support Programme – BSP”, leaded by Confapi and launched in the kick off conference in Rome on 6th February 2008. Since 2000 up to now the initiatives for CSR have highly increased: the progress Italy and other EU countries have made in these years are real. This process hasn’t been so easy and a long way remains towards the desired results. But, actually, a gap still exists in respect of new members and, even more, of candidate countries.