American Women in Science Before the Civil War

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

American Women in Science Before the Civil War AMERICAN WOMEN IN SCIENCE BEFORE THE CIVIL WAR Elizabeth Wagner Reed, Ph. D. University of Minnesota 400 Church Street S. E. Minneapolis 55455 Copyright 1992, Elizabeth Wagner Reed, Ph. D. 2 The first physics laboratory in a women's college was established by Professor Sarah Frances Whiting at Wellesley College, 1878. In this photograph, astronomer Annie Jump Cannon is the third student from the left. Her career was largely inspired by Prof. Whiting who, Cannon wrote, wanted her students ''to become not only good scholars, but women of influence in their communities." The only other physics lab at an undergraduate college before this was at MIT, where Prof. Whiting visited, finding it "nerveracking to be in places where women were really not expected to be, and to do things which women had not done before." 1 Table of Contents Preface, 3-4. Acknowledgements, 5. Part I. The activities of women as members of scientific societies, donors of money and of specimens to museums; collectors, teachers and artists; volunteer data collectors, 6-25. Part II. Twenty-two women who published in science before 1861 with brief life histories and an analysis of their publications. Introduction, 28-39. Agassiz, Elizabeth Cary. 1822-1907. "Valuable contributions to diverse branches of natural science," 28-39. Beecher, Catharine Esther. 1800-1887. "Arithmetic simplified," 40-48. Colden, Jane. 1724-1766. "First American woman to be distinguished as a botanist," 49-52. Cutter, Eunice Newton. 1819-1882. Writer on physiology and anatomy for children, 54-56. Dix, Dorothea Lynde. 1802-1887. Butterflies, flowers and "common things," 57-63. Foote, Eunice Newton. 1819-1888. Experimenter on gases, 64-68. Fowler, Lydia Folger, M.D. 1823-1878. Anatomy and physiology for women, 69-74 Herrick, Sophie Bledsoe. 1837-ca. 1900. Microscopist and writer, 75-85. Jacobi, Mary Putnam, 1842-1906. Physician, wife and mother, 86-104. Johnson, Laura H. ca. 1798-ca. 1870. "Lady Professor" of botany, 105-109. McDougall, Frances Green. 1805-1878."Renders science attractive without diluting it," 110-113. Mitchell, Maria. 1818-1889. Astronomer, mathematician and college professor, 114-124. Morris, Margaretta Hare. 1797-1867. "Une entomologiste," 125-135. Peterson, Hannah Bouvier. 1811-1870. "A complete treatise on astronomy," 136-139. Phelps, Almira Lincoln. 1793-1884. Influential teacher and writer in science, 140-152. Swift, Mary A. ca. 1800-ca. 1870. Her elementary physics book was translated into Burmese, 2 153-157. Taylor, Charlotte de Bernier. 1806-1861. Microscopist, entomologist and artist, 158-166. Taylor, Jane. ca. 1800-ca. 1870. "Physiology for Children," 167-170. Townsend, Mary. ca. 1790-1851. Entomologist, "treat them [insects] with kindness," 171-174. Tupper, Ellen Smith. 1822-1888. "Queen Bee of Iowa" - apiarist, 175-182. Welsh, Jane Kilby. 1790 ca. 1850. "Catechism of Botany," 183-188. Willard, Emma Hart. 1787-1870. Influential teacher and writer on science, 189-198. Summary, 199-204. Biography of Elizabeth W. Reed and Afterword by Catherine C. Reed, 205. 3 Preface In the last few years there have been quite a few scholarly publications on the roles of women in literature, art, social reform and politics. Many heretofore unknown women finally have been credited with important contributions to society. Missing from this array have been the similarly undocumented but substantial contributions of early American women to science. It is hoped that this review will induce others to undertake further research in this field. Much remains to be learned. The period chosen for this survey is the time from Colonial America to the onset of the Civil War. There was something of a hiatus during this war, when at least one scientific organization, the American Association for the Advancement of Science stopped meeting. After the war there was a rapid increase in women's participation in science as academic opportunities developed and some professional occupations became available to them. The term active in science is here used in its broad sense to include any promotion of science. This can come in many forms, experimental data, textbooks, teaching, donations of money, time and collections to institutions, and memberships in scientific societies. The actual designation as scientist is not used. It is an indefinable one at best, varying with the times, and sometimes related to the bias of the writer and the professional status of the individual under consideration. As in any other activity there is a hierarchy of status which this writer does not undertake to evaluate. Considering the handicaps under which many of these women labored, often denied entry to colleges and unable to attain professional status, one wonders why they continued to pursue this sort of work at all. It is a testimony to the interest that these women had in science that they continued to study, work and participate in science. Perhaps Ellen Tupper, an expert on the physiology and behavior of bees put it most clearly when she wrote in one of her columns on bee keeping that her reason for studying bees was that there was always something to think 4 about,some experiment to try, something to investigate. In short, she wrote, she had an intellectual as well as a physical employment. Perhaps she speaks for all these women (Part II, Tupper, 1:101). An incentive to do this work was provided by Mozans' 1913 book, Woman in Science (1), Hanaford's Centennial volume Daughters of America (2) and Meisel's Bibliography of American Natural History (3). The varied activities and range of interests of these early women are well described in Kohlstedt's article in Signs (4). Warner reviews the early educational opportunities for women in her paper in Isis (5) and Woody's two-volume history of women's education in the United States provides a comprehensive view of the subject (6). Rossiter's book describes the academic and social milieu in which these women worked (7). The contributions of these women before the Civil War range from writers on scientific subjects through volunteer collectors of weather data for the Smithsonian Institution to a girl's botany class which furnished a list of spring flowers for a museum. From this distance in time the contributions of these women are as difficult to measure as the women are to classify, but any contribution can favor an increase in knowledge for subsequent workers in the field. The following material is divided into two parts. Part I is a report on the activities of women who were engaged in scientific pursuits but left no written records of any work in science. These are the women who were members of and donors to scientific societies, the collectors, the teachers, the artists. Part II includes biographical and bibliographical data on 21 women who had some published writings in science before the Civil War. Some of course continued publishing after that date. Their later work is included. It is important in establishing the credibility of these women's achievements to have as complete a bibliography of their publications as possible and to have an evaluation of these writings from the standpoint of a scientist. The evaluation is included in the write up. The list of sources searched for the above information is in the appendix. 5 Acknowledgements It is impossible to list all the librarians and archivists who helped in searches, answered letters and gave encouragement for the project. Special acknowledgement must be made of the invaluable, personal assistance and helpful advice of Dr. Beatrice Smith, a longtime friend and colleague. The expert and cheerfu1 assistance of Bertha Storts was indispensable to the completion of this project as was also the advice and help of Sally Hogan in preparing the illustrations and help with the bibliography from my daughter, Catherine Reed. 6 Part 1 MEMBERSHIPS A survey of the membership lists and secretaries' reports in the transactions, journals, and proceedings of scientific societies shows a substantial amount of participation by women. Two years after the American Association for the Advancement of Science was organized in 1848, Maria Mitchell and Margaretta Morris became members. In 1856 the name of Bernice D. Ames was added and in 1859 Almira Lincoln Phelps joined. This organization did not meet during the years 1861-1866. Women members rapidly increased until by 1875 there were 80 (8). (Membership lists must be taken as approximate since they depend on the accuracy of the secretary's records. Women's names, however, were almost invariably preceded by Miss or Mrs. in the early records so the identification of sex was generally possible.) Scientific organizations recognized women for their achievements also. The American Academy of Arts and Sciences made Maria Mitchell an associate fellow in 1848, apparently in recognition of her achievement in astronomy, the first discovery of a telescopic comet (Memoirs, Vol. IX pt. 2 p xii 1848, p. 52). The Philadelphia Academy of Natural Science elected its first woman member, Lucy Say, in 1841. Mrs. Say illustrated her husband's volume on shells and gave a large collection of his materials including books and the original plates to this organization. The second member elected to this prestigious group was Margaretta Morris, an internationally known entomologist, in 1859 (See Part II for Morris). By 1875 there were 26 female members a1though only the two named were members before 1861 (9). A list of members of the Essex Institute showed the names of five women in the first group of 84 members in 1834. This Natural History Society was organized in 1833 to promote the study of natural history in Essex County and to procure a library and a cabinet of specimens (10). In 1847 this organization was joined to the Essex Historical Society and was renamed the Essex Institute.
Recommended publications
  • University of Oklahoma Graduate College
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE SCIENCE IN THE AMERICAN STYLE, 1700 – 1800 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By ROBYN DAVIS M CMILLIN Norman, Oklahoma 2009 SCIENCE IN THE AMERICAN STYLE, 1700 – 1800 A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BY ________________________ Prof. Paul A. Gilje, Chair ________________________ Prof. Catherine E. Kelly ________________________ Prof. Judith S. Lewis ________________________ Prof. Joshua A. Piker ________________________ Prof. R. Richard Hamerla © Copyright by ROBYN DAVIS M CMILLIN 2009 All Rights Reserved. To my excellent and generous teacher, Paul A. Gilje. Thank you. Acknowledgements The only thing greater than the many obligations I incurred during the research and writing of this work is the pleasure that I take in acknowledging those debts. It would have been impossible for me to undertake, much less complete, this project without the support of the institutions and people who helped me along the way. Archival research is the sine qua non of history; mine was funded by numerous grants supporting work in repositories from California to Massachusetts. A Friends Fellowship from the McNeil Center for Early American Studies supported my first year of research in the Philadelphia archives and also immersed me in the intellectual ferment and camaraderie for which the Center is justly renowned. A Dissertation Fellowship from the Gilder Lehrman Institute for American History provided months of support to work in the daunting Manuscript Division of the New York Public Library. The Chandis Securities Fellowship from the Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens brought me to San Marino and gave me entrée to an unequaled library of primary and secondary sources, in one of the most beautiful spots on Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nineteenth Amendment, Sex Equality, Federalism, and the Family
    VOLUME 115 FEBRUARY 2002 NUMBER 4 HARVARD LAW REVIEW ARTICLE SHE THE PEOPLE: THE NINETEENTH AMENDMENT, SEX EQUALITY, FEDERALISM, AND THE FAMILY Reva B. Siegel TABLE OF CONTENTS IN TRO D UCTIO N ............................................................................................................................... 948 I. THE SEX DISCRIMINATION PARADIGM ............................................................................... 953 II. TOWARD A SYNTHETIC READING OF THE FOURTEENTH AND NINETEENTH AMEND- MENTS: A NEW HISTORICAL FOUNDATION FOR SEX DISCRIMINATION DOCTRINE ....... 96o A. Frontiero's Use of History in Building the Race Analogy ................................................ 961 B. Analogical and Synthetic Interpretation:A New Role for History in Sex Discrim inationD octrine..................................................................................................... 965 C. HistoricalTies Between the Fourteenth and Nineteenth Amendments ......................... 968 D. Reading the Suffrage Debates: Some PreliminaryRemarks ........................................... 976 III. VOTING AND THE FAM ILY ...................................................................................................... 977 A. Virtual Representation:Male Household Headship in Public and Private Law .......... 981 B. "Self-Government": The Woman Suffrage Rejoinder....................................................... 987 C. The Surrejoinder:Marital Unity Arguments Against Woman Suffrage ......................... 993 IV. OF FAMILIES,
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecology, Behavior, and Biological Control Potential of Hymenopteran Parasitoids of Woodwasps (Hymenoptera: Siricidae) in North America
    REVIEW:BIOLOGICAL CONTROL-PARASITOIDS &PREDATORS The Ecology, Behavior, and Biological Control Potential of Hymenopteran Parasitoids of Woodwasps (Hymenoptera: Siricidae) in North America 1 DAVID R. COYLE AND KAMAL J. K. GANDHI Daniel B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 Environ. Entomol. 41(4): 731Ð749 (2012); DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/EN11280 ABSTRACT Native and exotic siricid wasps (Hymenoptera: Siricidae) can be ecologically and/or economically important woodboring insects in forests worldwide. In particular, Sirex noctilio (F.), a Eurasian species that recently has been introduced to North America, has caused pine tree (Pinus spp.) mortality in its non-native range in the southern hemisphere. Native siricid wasps are known to have a rich complex of hymenopteran parasitoids that may provide some biological control pressure on S. noctilio as it continues to expand its range in North America. We reviewed ecological information about the hymenopteran parasitoids of siricids in North America north of Mexico, including their distribution, life cycle, seasonal phenology, and impacts on native siricid hosts with some potential efÞcacy as biological control agents for S. noctilio. Literature review indicated that in the hymenop- teran families Stephanidae, Ibaliidae, and Ichneumonidae, there are Þve genera and 26 species and subspecies of native parasitoids documented from 16 native siricids reported from 110 tree host species. Among parasitoids that attack the siricid subfamily Siricinae, Ibalia leucospoides ensiger (Norton), Rhyssa persuasoria (L.), and Megarhyssa nortoni (Cresson) were associated with the greatest number of siricid and tree species. These three species, along with R. lineolata (Kirby), are the most widely distributed Siricinae parasitoid species in the eastern and western forests of North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Catharine Beecher, Domestic Economy, and Social Reform
    Constructing the Past Volume 7 Issue 1 Article 5 2006 Architecture of the Millennium: Catharine Beecher, Domestic Economy, and Social Reform Erie M. Roberts Illinois Wesleyan University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/constructing Recommended Citation Roberts, Erie M. (2006) "Architecture of the Millennium: Catharine Beecher, Domestic Economy, and Social Reform," Constructing the Past: Vol. 7 : Iss. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/constructing/vol7/iss1/5 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Commons @ IWU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this material in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This material has been accepted for inclusion by editorial board of the Undergraduate Economic Review and the Economics Department at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. Architecture of the Millennium: Catharine Beecher, Domestic Economy, and Social Reform Abstract This article discusses Catherine Beecher's ideas about how women, as the Christian moral center and teachers, could reform American society. She put homemakers at a center of power, since she believed that they would be able to not only teach children to become true Christian citizens, but reform men as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Harriet Beecher Stowe Papers in the HBSC Collection
    Harriet Beecher Stowe Papers in the Harriet Beecher Stowe Center’s Collections Finding Aid To schedule a research appointment, please call the Collections Manager at 860.522.9258 ext. 313 or email [email protected] Harriet Beecher Stowe Papers in the Stowe Center's Collection Note: See end of document for manuscript type definitions. Manuscript type & Recipient Title Date Place length Collection Summary Other Information [Stowe's first known letter] Ten year-old Harriet Beecher writes to her older brother Edward attending Yale. She would like to see "my little sister Isabella". Foote family news. Talks of spending the Nutplains summer at Nutplains. Asks him to write back. Loose signatures of Beecher, Edward (1803-1895) 1822 March 14 [Guilford, CT] ALS, 1 pp. Acquisitions Lyman Beecher and HBS. Album which belonged to HBS; marbelized paper with red leather spine. First written page inscribed: Your Affectionate Father Lyman At end, 1 1/2-page mss of a 28 verse, seven Beecher Sufficient to the day is the evil thereof. Hartford Aug 24, stanza poem, composed by Mrs. Stowe, 1840". Pages 2 and 3 include a poem. There follow 65 mss entitled " Who shall not fear thee oh Lord". poems, original and quotes, and prose from relatives and friends, This poem seems never to have been Katharine S. including HBS's teacher at Miss Pierece's school in Litchfield, CT, published. [Pub. in The Hartford Courant Autograph Bound mss, 74 Day, Bound John Brace. Also two poems of Mrs. Hemans, copied in HBS's Sunday Magazine, Sept., 1960].Several album 1824-1844 Hartford, CT pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Harriet Beecher Stowe's Multifaceted Response to the Nineteenth
    Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Multifaceted Response to the Nineteenth-Century Woman Question amy easton-flake Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/tneq/article-pdf/86/1/29/1793865/tneq_a_00256.pdf by guest on 28 September 2021 N the decade following the American Civil War, the I renowned children of Lyman Beecher each took his or her own position along the broad spectrum of debate con- cerning woman suffrage. Henry Ward Beecher served as the first president of the American Woman Suffrage Association (estab. 1869); Isabella Beecher Hooker worked closely with Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony in the National Woman Suffrage Association (estab. 1869); Catharine Beecher helped found the first female-led antisuffrage association, the Anti-Sixteenth Amendment Society (estab. 1870); and Harriet Beecher Stowe, despite pressure from her siblings and other movement leaders and an obvious interest in the issue, re- mained aloof from all organized groups. In the absence of any definitive statement from her, each faction claimed her as an advocate. Between 1870 and 1871, for example, each organi- zation’s journal either listed Stowe as a contributor or quoted from her writings.1 In recent years, literary critics Josephine Donovan and Bar- bara A. White have investigated Stowe’s relation to suffrage 1Stanton listed both Isabella Beecher Hooker and Harriet Beecher Stowe as “prin- cipal contributors” (p. 397)inthe23 December 1869 Revolution, organ of the National Woman Suffrage Association, although Stowe never contributed a single piece of writ- ing to it. Stowe did contribute numerous pieces to the Woman’s Journal. For instance, she praised the Woman’s Journal for its “conservative religious tone” and for not fol- lowing George Sand and the French Woman’s movement (3 September 1870,p.273).
    [Show full text]
  • The Pioneering Efforts of Wise Women in Medicine and The
    THE PIONEERING EFFORTS OF WISE WOMEN IN MEDICINE AND THE MEDICAL SCIENCES EDITORS Gerald Friedland MD, FRCPE, FRCR Jennifer Tender, MD Leah Dickstein, MD Linda Shortliffe, MD 1 PREFACE A boy and his father are in a terrible car crash. The father is killed and the child suffers head trauma and is taken to the local emergency room for a neurosurgical procedure. The attending neurosurgeon walks into the emergency room and states “I cannot perform the surgery. This is my son.” Who is the neurosurgeon? Forty years ago, this riddle stumped elementary school students, but now children are perplexed by its simplicity and quickly respond “the doctor is his mother.” Although this new generation may not make presumptions about the gender of a physician or consider a woman neurosurgeon to be an anomaly, medicine still needs to undergo major changes before it can be truly egalitarian. When Dr. Gerald Friedland’s wife and daughter became physicians, he became more sensitive to the discrimination faced by women in medicine. He approached Linda Shortliffe, MD (Professor of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine) and asked whether she would be willing to hold the first reported conference to highlight Women in Medicine and the Sciences. She agreed. The conference was held in the Fairchild Auditorium at the Stanford University School of Medicine on March 10, 2000. In 2012 Leah Dickstein, MD contacted Gerald Friedland and informed him that she had a video of the conference. This video was transformed into the back-bone of this book. The chapters have been edited and updated and the lectures translated into written prose.
    [Show full text]
  • American Heritage Day
    American Heritage Day DEAR PARENTS, Each year the elementary school students at Valley Christian Academy prepare a speech depicting the life of a great American man or woman. The speech is written in the first person and should include the character’s birth, death, and major accomplishments. Parents should feel free to help their children write these speeches. A good way to write the speech is to find a child’s biography and follow the story line as you construct the speech. This will make for a more interesting speech rather than a mere recitation of facts from the encyclopedia. Students will be awarded extra points for including spiritual application in their speeches. Please adhere to the following time limits. K-1 Speeches must be 1-3 minutes in length with a minimum of 175 words. 2-3 Speeches must be 2-5 minutes in length with a minimum of 350 words. 4-6 Speeches must be 3-10 minutes in length with a minimum of 525 words. Students will give their speeches in class. They should be sure to have their speeches memorized well enough so they do not need any prompts. Please be aware that students who need frequent prompting will receive a low grade. Also, any student with a speech that doesn’t meet the minimum requirement will receive a “D” or “F.” Students must portray a different character each year. One of the goals of this assignment is to help our children learn about different men and women who have made America great. Help your child choose characters from whom they can learn much.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's History Is Everywhere: 10 Ideas for Celebrating in Communities
    Women’s History is Everywhere: 10 Ideas for Celebrating In Communities A How-To Community Handbook Prepared by The President’s Commission on the Celebration of Women in American History “Just think of the ideas, the inventions, the social movements that have so dramatically altered our society. Now, many of those movements and ideas we can trace to our own founding, our founding documents: the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. And we can then follow those ideas as they move toward Seneca Falls, where 150 years ago, women struggled to articulate what their rights should be. From women’s struggle to gain the right to vote to gaining the access that we needed in the halls of academia, to pursuing the jobs and business opportunities we were qualified for, to competing on the field of sports, we have seen many breathtaking changes. Whether we know the names of the women who have done these acts because they stand in history, or we see them in the television or the newspaper coverage, we know that for everyone whose name we know there are countless women who are engaged every day in the ordinary, but remarkable, acts of citizenship.” —- Hillary Rodham Clinton, March 15, 1999 Women’s History is Everywhere: 10 Ideas for Celebrating In Communities A How-To Community Handbook prepared by the President’s Commission on the Celebration of Women in American History Commission Co-Chairs: Ann Lewis and Beth Newburger Commission Members: Dr. Johnnetta B. Cole, J. Michael Cook, Dr. Barbara Goldsmith, LaDonna Harris, Gloria Johnson, Dr. Elaine Kim, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Figures in Social Studies Teks Draft – October 17, 2009
    HISTORICAL FIGURES IN SOCIAL STUDIES TEKS DRAFT – OCTOBER 17, 2009 FOLLOW THE WORD FOLLOW THE WORDS “SUCH GRADE OR INTRODUCTION “INCLUDING” (REQUIRED TO BE AS” (EXAMPLES OF WHAT MAY COURSE TAUGHT) BE TAUGHT) Kindergarten George Washington Stephen F. Austin No additional historical figures are George Washington listed. Grade 1 Abraham Lincoln Sam Houston Clara Harlow Barton (moved to Gr. 3) Martin Luther King, Jr. Alexander Graham Bell Abraham Lincoln Thomas Edison George Washington Nathan Hale (moved to Gr. 5) Sam Houston (moved to including) Frances Scott Key Martin Luther King, Jr.(to including) Abraham Lincoln (moved to including) Benjamin Franklin Garrett Morgan Eleanor Roosevelt Grade 2 No historical figures are listed. No specific historical figures are Abigail Adams required. George Washington Carver Amelia Earhart Robert Fulton Henrietta C. King (deleted) Thurgood Marshall Florence Nightingale (deleted) Irma Rangel Paul Revere (deleted) Theodore Roosevelt Sojourner Truth Women Airforce Service Pilots (WASP) of World War II Black = In Current TEKS and 10/17/09 Draft; Green = Recommended Additions; Red = Recommended Deletions 1 Historical figures listed alphabetically by last name HISTORICAL FIGURES IN SOCIAL STUDIES TEKS DRAFT – OCTOBER 17, 2009 FOLLOW THE WORD FOLLOW THE WORDS “SUCH GRADE OR INTRODUCTION “INCLUDING” (REQUIRED TO BE AS” (EXAMPLES OF WHAT MAY COURSE TAUGHT) BE TAUGHT) Grade 3 Paul Bunyan Benjamin Banneker Wallace Amos Clara Barton Mary Kay Ash Todd Beamer Jane Addams (moved to Gr. 5) Christopher Columbus Pecos Bill (deleted) Founding Fathers Daniel Boone (deleted) Henry Ford Paul Bunyan (deleted) Benjamin Franklin William Clark (moved to Gr. 5) Dr. Hector P. Garcia Christopher Columbus (to including) Dolores Huerta David Crockett (moved to Gr.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2020 Plant Protection & Conservation Programs
    Oregon Department of Agriculture Plant Protection & Conservation Programs ANNUAL REPORT 2020 www.oregon.gov/ODA Plant Protection & Conservation Programs Phone: 503-986-4636 Website: www.oregon.gov/ODA Find this report online: https://oda.direct/PlantAnnualReport Publication date: March 2021 Table Tableof Contents of Contents ADMINISTRATION—4 Director’s View . 4 Retirements: . 6 Plant Protection and Conservation Programs Staff . 9 NURSERY AND CHRISTMAS TREE—10 What Do We Do? . 10 Christmas Tree Shipping Season Summary . 16 Personnel Updates . .11 Program Overview . 16 2020: A Year of Challenge . .11 New Rule . 16 Hawaii . 17 COVID Response . 12 Mexico . 17 Funding Sources . 13 Nursery Research Assessment Fund . 14 IPPM-Nursery Surveys . 17 Phytophthora ramorum Nursery Program . 14 National Traceback Investigation: Ralstonia in Oregon Nurseries . 18 Western Horticultural Inspection Society (WHIS) Annual Meeting . 19 HEMP—20 2020 Program Highlights . 20 2020 Hemp Inspection Annual Report . 21 2020 Hemp Rule-making . 21 Table 1: ODA Hemp Violations . 23 Hemp Testing . .24 INSECT PEST PREVENTION & MANAGEMENT—25 A Year of Personnel Changes-Retirements-Promotions High-Tech Sites Survey . .33 . 26 Early Detection and Rapid Response for Exotic Bark Retirements . 27 and Ambrosia Beetles . 33 My Unexpected Career With ODA . .28 Xyleborus monographus Early Detection and Rapid Response (EDRR) Trapping . 34 2020 Program Notes . .29 Outreach and Education . 29 Granulate Ambrosia Beetle and Other Wood Boring Insects Associated with Creosoting Plants . 34 New Detections . .29 Japanese Beetle Program . .29 Apple Maggot Program . .35 Exotic Fruit Fly Survey . .35 2018 Program Highlights . .29 Japanese Beetle Eradication . .30 Grasshopper and Mormon Cricket Program . .35 Grasshopper Outbreak Response – Harney County .
    [Show full text]
  • Capitalism and Planetary Destruction: Activism for Climate Change Emergency
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
    [Show full text]