Us Holocaust Museum

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Us Holocaust Museum U.S. HOLOCAUST MUSEUM: 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE WANNSEE CONFER- ENCE OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT OF THE COMMITTEE ON INTERIOR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SECOND CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON U.S. HOLOCAUST MUSEUM: 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE WANNSEE CONFERENCE HEARING HELD IN WASHINGTON, DC FEBRUARY 5, 1992 Serial No. 102-21 Printed for the use of the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 55-1991-- WASHINGTON : 1992 For sale bNh c U.S. (hicrnmcnt Printing )f ice Superinmclidcnt oIfDIIocuilni,. ('o1i 1ni'.\iiniI Sas Ollicc. \,',,,htlon. DC 204(2 ISBN 0-16-U38532-6 H44 1-5, COMMITTEE ON INTERIOR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES GEORGE MILLER, California, Chairman PHILIP R. SHARP, Indiana DON YOUNG, Alaska, EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts Ranking Republican Member AUSTIN J. MURPHY, Pennsylvania ROBERT J. LAGOMARSINO, California NICK JOE RAHALL II, West Virginia RON MARLENEE, Montana BRUCE F. VENTO, Minnesota JAMES V. HANSEN, Utah PAT WILLIAMS, Montana BARBARA F. VUCANOVICH, Nevada BEVERLY B. BYRON, Maryland BEN BLAZ, Guam RON DE LUGO, Virgin Islands JOHN J. RHODES III, Arizoni SAM GEJDENSON, Connecticut ELTON GALLEGLY, California PETER H. KOSTMAYER, Pennsylvania ROBERT F. SMITH, Oregon RICHARD H. LEHMAN, Cvlifornia - CRAIG THOMAS, Wyoming BILL RICHARDSON, New Mexico JOHN J. DUNCAN, JR., Tennessee GEORGE (BUDDY) DARDEN, Georgia RICHARD T. SCHULZE, Pennsylvania MEL LEVINE, Californiv JOEL HEFLEY, Colorado WAYNE OWENS, Utah CHARLES H. TAYLOR, North Carolina JOHN LEWIS, Georgia JOHN T. DOOLITTLE, California BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado WAYNE ALLARD, Colorado PETER A. DEFAZIO, Oregon RICHARD H. BAKER, Louisiana ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American Samoa TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York JIM JONTZ, Indiana PETER HOAGLAND, New England HARRY JOHNSTON, Florida LARRY LAROCCO, Idaho NEIL ABERCROMBIE, Hawaii CALVIN M. DOOLEY, California ANTONIO COLORADO, Puerto Rico DANIEL P. BEARD, Staff Director RICHARD MELTZER, General Counsel DAN VAL KISH, Republican Staff Director SUBCOMMIrrEE ON ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT PETER H. KOSTMAYER, Pennsylvania, Chairman PHILIP R. SHARP, Indiana JOHN J. RHODES III, Arizona EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts BEN GARRIDO BLAZ, Guam SAM GEJDENSON, Connecticut CRAIG THOMAS, Wyoming CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York JOEL HEFLEY, Colorado AUSTIN J. MURPHY, Pennsylvania CHARLES H. TAYLOR, North Carolina BILL RICHARDSON, New Mexico JOHN T. DOOLITTLE, California GEORGE (BUDDY) DARDEN, Georgia WAYNE ALLARD, Colorado JIM JONTZ, Indiana DON YOUNG, Alaska RICHARD H. LEHMAN, California WAYNE OWENS, Utah GEORGE MILLER, California DAVID WEIss, Staff Director EMILY GRAY, Clerk CHRISTOPHER B. KEARNEY, Minority Counsel on Energy and the Environment CONTENTS Page Hearing held: F ebruary 5, 1992 ....................................................................................................... 1 WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1992 Statements: Panel consisting of: Edith Millman, Holocaust survivor .............................................................. 3 Bjorn J. Gruenwald, Holocaust survivor ...................................................... 14 Panel from the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council consisting of: Sara J. Bloomfield, executive director .......................................................... 23 Sybil M ilton, resident historian ..................................................................... 46 Alvin Rosenfeld, research consultant ........................................................... 52 Panel consisting of: Ruth Laibson, executive director, Interfaith Council on the Holocaust 63 Reinhard Wiemer, 2nd Secretary, Cultural Department, German Em- b assy ................................................................................................................ 69 Panel consisting of: Richard Breitman, historian, American University ................. 88 Gerald Feldman, historian, University of California at Berkeley .......... 97 Charles W. Sydnor, Jr., historian, Central Virginia Educational Tele- com m unications Corporation ...................................................................... 102 (1II) U.S. HOLOCAUST MUSEUM: 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE WANNSEE CONFERENCE WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1992 U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, COMMITTEE ON INTERIOR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS, Washington, DC. The subcommittee met at 1:30 p.m. in room 1324 of the Long- worth House Office Building, the Hon. Peter H. Kostmayer (chair- man of the subcommittee) presiding. Mr. KOSTMAYER. The subcommittee will come to order. On January 20, 1942, in a villa in Wannsee, a quiet suburb of Berlin, a conference of senior government officials of Nazi Germa- ny was held to discuss the implementation of the state-sponsored systematic murder of an estimated 11 million European Jews. The Nazis called it "the final solution to the Jewish question." We call it the Holocaust. Although the plan to murder the Jews of Europe had been previously decided and was, in fact, already underway on a vast scale, it was apparently necessary to hold what we might call a cabinet-level meeting to make sure that all the various de- partments of the government understood their role in this gigantic and unprecedented undertaking. The historical significance of the Wannsee Confei ence, as it came to be known, is not one of public drama and display. Quite the con- trary, despite the grim subject, the minutes of the meeting show a typical interagency group discussing resettlement, natural decline, and final solution, as euphemisms for deportation, death from forced labor and starvation, and genocide itself. The Wannsee participants were -men of experience, education, and culture. Eight held Ph.Ds. In 90 minutes over cognac and a warm fire, they outlined the implementation of the murder of mil- lions of people. Because of their efficiency, the world is a different place. Our understanding of the nature of man has been irrevoca- bly altered by the Holocaust. But what the Wannsee Conference demonstrates most clearly and most chillingly is the potential of government for evil. It shows how men and women, both in and out of government, can shape and approve or acquiesce to the kind of agenda forged at Wannsee 50 years ago. What happened at Wannsee calls out for the atten- tion of every citizen in a democracy to what appears to be the rou.- tine business of government and for the involvement of every citi- zen 's moral sense in the choices that are made in the voting booth and on the floors of our legislatures. (1) - The 15 Wannsee officials bear responsibility for genocide. But so do the thousands of civil servants and other functionaries who im- plemented their orders. And so do the millions of Germans and other Europeans who discovered their neighbors gone in the morn- ing, who heard the trains packed with Jews moving-through their stations and who smelled the smoke of the crematoria. Even our own country cannot escape blame. While America fought Hitler and fascism and paid for its bravery and idealism with the lives of thousands of its sons and daughters far away from the battlefield, the judgment of history is harsh. How many victims might have been saved had we protested more forcefully or opened our doors more widely? Some think such unspeakable deeds can never be repeated. The -partnership of indifference and intolerance are, of course, still here. In Germany, some have a desire to face the truth about Nazism. Some don't. A recent poll revealed that 42 percent of Ger- mans believe the Nazis had their good side, 36 percent believe Jews have too much influence in the world, 32 percent believe Jews are partly responsible if they are hated and persecuted, and 64 percent do not feel free that they can express their true opinions of Jews. And even in the freest and most democratic country of them all, our own, David Duke stirs the fires of human hatred. This subcommittee, with jurisdiction over the U.S. Holocaust Me- morial Council, holds this hearing commemorating the 50th anni- versary of the Wannsee Conference to remind ourselves of the re- sponsibilities of this institution and this country in recalling those dark days and the world's abandonment not only of the Jews, but of the handicapped, Gypsies, homosexuals, communists, trade unionists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and others who for one reason or another offended the Nazis. As an American, as a non-Jew, and as a Congressman, I recall with special shame the failure then of a Congress with very few Jews to do more. On February 19, 1939, Senator Robert Wagner of New York and Representative Edith Rogers of Massachusetts intro- duced a bill in the Congress to allow 10,000 Jewish refugees chil- dren under age 14, from Europe, into the United States in 1939 and 1940. The Daughters of the American Revolution and the American Legion testified against the bill, which failed to get enough votes to get out of the subcommittee. Here is what one of the witnesses said. "Mr. Chairman, I am the daughter of generations of patriots. My forefathers helped to found this Republic. These refugees have a heritage of hate. They could never become loyal Americans." Three months later, on May 27, 1939, the SS St. Louis, a ship carrying nearly 1,000 European Jews, lingered in Havana harbor until being turned away. A few days later, after wandering aim- lessly, the SS St. Louis anchored 4 miles from Miami. The next day, on June 6, the ship was turned away by the U.S. immigration
Recommended publications
  • Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File
    Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc.
    [Show full text]
  • From Humiliation to Humanity Reconciling Helen Goldman’S Testimony with the Forensic Strictures of the Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial
    S: I. M. O. N. Vol. 8|2021|No.1 SHOAH: INTERVENTION. METHODS. DOCUMENTATION. Andrew Clark Wisely From Humiliation to Humanity Reconciling Helen Goldman’s Testimony with the Forensic Strictures of the Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial Abstract On 3 September 1964, during the Frankfurt Auschwitz trial, Helen Goldman accused SS camp doctor Franz Lucas of selecting her mother and siblings for the gas chamber when the family arrived at Birkenau in May 1944. Although she could identify Lucas, the court con- sidered her information under cross-examination too inconsistent to build a case against Lucas. To appreciate Goldman’s authority, we must remove her from the humiliation of the West German legal gaze and inquire instead how she is seen through the lens of witness hospitality (directly by Emmi Bonhoeffer) and psychiatric assessment (indirectly by Dr Walter von Baeyer). The appearance of Auschwitz survivor Helen (Kaufman) Goldman in the court- room of the Frankfurt Auschwitz trial on 3 September 1964 was hard to forget for all onlookers. Goldman accused the former SS camp doctor Dr Franz Lucas of se- lecting her mother and younger siblings for the gas chamber on the day the family arrived at Birkenau in May 1944.1 Lucas, considered the best behaved of the twenty defendants during the twenty-month-long trial, claimed not to recognise his accus- er, who after identifying him from a line-up became increasingly distraught under cross-examination. Ultimately, the court rejected Goldman’s accusations, choosing instead to believe survivors of Ravensbrück who recounted that Lucas had helped them survive the final months of the war.2 Goldman’s breakdown of credibility echoed the experience of many prosecution witnesses in West German postwar tri- als after 1949.
    [Show full text]
  • FRA Handbook for Teachers
    Excursion to the past – teaching for the future: Handbook for teachers 1 This Handbook covers most of the articles as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular those relating to Chapter I to IV - dignity, freedoms, equality, solidarity and citizens’ rights. Cover image: © Michael St. Maur Sheil/CORBIS October Auschwitz, Poland Michael St. Maur Sheil Encyclopedia FRA - European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights Schwarzenbergplatz 11 1040 - Wien Austria Tel.: +43 (0)1 580 30 - 0 Fax: +43 (0)1 580 30 - 691 E-Mail: [email protected] www.fra.europa.eu Excursion to the past – teaching for the future: Handbook for teachers FOREWORD Th e Holocaust has taught us that without respect and application of basic human rights the unspeakable can become a reality. Th ere is therefore a close connection between the Holocaust and subsequent human rights developments. Th e adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in , and later the adoption of European regional human rights instruments, was followed by a gradual coming to terms with the lessons of the Holocaust and its signifi cance for the values that strengthen the European Union today. Th e European Union recognises the Holocaust as a key and seminal event in European history and heritage. Th e values that underpin the European Union and are common to all its Member States have key aspects related directly to the experience of the Jewish populations during the period before, during and after the Second World War. Th e concepts of the universality and indivisibility of human rights become even more pronounced when we look back at the Holocaust and realise the need to remain vocal and vigilant on the question of human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Nachwort Zur Dritten Auflage
    Nachwort zur dritten Auflage Seit Erscheinen der Erstauflage dieses Buches im Jahre 1993 haben sich hinsicht- lich der Rezeption des Verfolgungsschicksals der Zeugen Jehovas im „Dritten Reich" eine Reihe gravierender Veränderungen vollzogen. Jahrzehntelang blieb den Zeugen Jehovas eine öffentliche Würdigung als Opfer- gruppe versagt. Auch in der Wissenschaft stieß ihre Geschichte im großen und ganzen auf kein Interesse. Dieses Los teilen die Zeugen Jehovas mit anderen Grup- pen von Nazi-Verfolgten, deren gesellschaftliche Marginalisierang auch nach 1945 fortdauerte, beispielsweise den Sinti und Roma. Im Osten Deutschlands, wo unter Verweis auf die revolutionäre Tradition der herrschenden Partei und die im eigenen Land angeblich erfolgte Einlösung des antifaschistischen Vermächtnisses die Bevölkerung von der Verantwortung für die Vergangenheit freigesprochen bzw. exkulpiert wurde, waren die Zeugen Jehovas, die nach ihrem Verbot in der DDR im August 1950 erneuter Verfolgung ausgesetzt waren, allenfalls ein Thema für die Staatssicherheit. Sie wurden feindlicher Nach- richtentätigkeit und staatsfeindliche Handlungen bezichtigt. Um den für die DDR mißlichen Umstand, daß es sich bei den Zeugen Jehovas um Nazi-Verfolgte han- delte, zu begegnen, wurde vor keiner Diffamierung zurückgeschreckt: Bei der Füh- rung der Zeugen Jehovas habe es sich um „vom Großkapital gekaufte", „faschi- stisch kompromittierte religiös-politische Abenteurer" gehandelt, die um die „Gunst der Nazis" geworben und sich später zum „massenweisen Verrat der eigenen Glau- bensbrüder an die Gestapo" bereit erklärt hätten1. Im Westen Deutschlands, wo in den ersten beiden Nachkriegsjahrzehnten Erin- nerungsverweigerung und Schuldabwehr in der Bevölkerung vorherrschten und der Reintegration der Verantwortlichen aus Verwaltung, Kriegswirtschaft und Wehrmacht weit mehr Aufmerksamkeit geschenkt wurde als der Rehabilitation der Nazi-Verfolgten, beschränkte sich lange Zeit die Beschäftigung mit „Verfolgung und Widerstand" im wesentlichen auf den 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Title the Lagermuseum Creative Manuscript and 'Encountering Auschwitz: Touring the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum' C
    Thesis Title The Lagermuseum Creative Manuscript and ‘Encountering Auschwitz: Touring the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum’ Critical Thesis Author Dr Claire Griffiths, BA (Hons), MA, PhD Qualification Creative and Critical Writing PhD Institution University of East Anglia, Norwich School of Literature, Drama and Creative Writing Date January 2015 Word Count 91,102 (excluding appendices) This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution. Abstract The Lagermuseum My creative manuscript – an extract of a longer novel – seeks to illuminate a little- known aspect of the history of the Auschwitz concentration and death camp complex, namely the trade and display of prisoner artworks. However, it is also concerned with exposing the governing paradigms inherent to contemporary encounters with the Holocaust, calling attention to the curatorial processes present in all interrogations of this most contentious historical subject. Questions relating to ownership, display and representational hierarchies permeate the text, characterised by a shape-shifting curator figure and artworks which refuse to adhere to the canon he creates for them. The Lagermuseum is thus in constant dialogue with my critical thesis, examining the fictional devices which often remain unacknowledged within established
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Preparation, Consultation, and Coordination
    Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement Chapter 5 Preparation, Consultation, and Coordination Contents Project Management Team....................................................................................................................... 2 EIS Team Members .................................................................................................................................... 3 Administrative Support ............................................................................................................................ 6 Document Production............................................................................................................................... 6 Communications Team ............................................................................................................................. 6 GIS/Spatial Analysis Team ......................................................................................................................... 7 Science Advisory Group ............................................................................................................................ 7 Other Contributors ................................................................................................................................... 9 Agencies and Organizations Contacted ................................................................................................ 14 Chapter 5: Consultation and Coordination List of Preparers This
    [Show full text]
  • 2 •.' .{:~Usj$);' Aqri.Cu: ;~; :L:.'Tii~:L:;:~)~~! ~W}.J' ~I~."
    112!/19/ 92 18 : 4d This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas 2 SENATE~ 313162648446;# 2 SENT av: : 10-1~-9http://dolearchives.ku.edu2:26PM ; KEMPTHORNE fOLITICAL NOTgS l. The Democrat running for this Senate seat is the incumbent Congresaman in Idaho House District 2, Richard Stallings. He was on the ·House Ag committee and has given a good "appearance .. to aq groups over the years. This is the case even thouqh this is generally Republican territory. His voting record does have some flaws as noted on ~he :. ; e~c . ;Lpse~ ; 1 t>-eet. 2 •.' .{ :~usj$);' aqri.cu: ; ~; :l: .'tii~:l:;:~)~ ~ !~~w}.J' ~i~ ." . :.: · ~ ·J.~• " ,:, NAF,~A; .. -.:.. ~ .·. ~ ! !t ~~.r~l); ~.:*9 \:•ugar beet ·g:rowing area .., Sta.1J.. 1,ngs vot~fi : ~I ., · ~t , ~ f'{.. ~ ti : :t:J.~r ~ .: and ie against NAFTA. The . .. , sugar.: indust.~i : otftn. Wi$i(!i:Hi•i.a&a:1 l't·· NAFTA. Kempthorna has, to this point, stayed with the "I am reviewing the detail~ to see what it will do for Idaho." Several of the ag commodity groups are getting concerned about what it will do either directly with their commodity or indirectly by displacing the 200,000 acres of sugar beets to another crop. Also, the wheat and barley producers feel there were issues such as product transparency and tr~naportation subsidies that were left unresolved in CFTA and have been left out of NAFTA and GATT. B. Drought - what that means and what amounts will be available through the disaster programs. The Democrat has made a point of when the President made available the disaster money and how little that is compared to the naed nationally.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Delegation
    CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION Boise Depot Tower Photo courtesy of: Boise Convention & Visitors Bureau CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION 39 Congressional Districts 40 IDAHO BLUE BOOK Congressional Qualifi cations Method of Offi cer Selection Qualifi cation Term of Offi ce United Elected by greatest 30 years of age, US Six years States number of votes in citizen for at least 9 Senator general election years and an Idaho resident United Elected by greatest 25 years of age, US Two years States number of votes in citizen for at least 7 Congressman general election years and an Idaho resident Article I of the U.S. Constitution states that Congress will consist of two separate houses. A lawmaking body with two houses is called a bicameral legislature. The two houses that make up the U.S. Congress are the House of Representatives and the Senate. Congress is the primary lawmaking body in the U.S. government. To solve problems, Members of Congress introduce legislative proposals called bills or resolutions. After considering these proposals, Members vote to adopt or to reject them. Members of Congress also review the work of executive agencies to determine if they are following government policy, and may introduce new legislation based on what they discover. Bills accepted by both houses of Congress and by the President become law. When the President vetoes a bill and returns it to Congress, Congress reviews the reasons for the rejection but may still act to pass the bill. The U.S. Constitution allows Congress to override the President’s veto with a two-thirds majority vote of both the House and the Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 108 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 108 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 150 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, APRIL 22, 2004 No. 53 House of Representatives The House met at 9 a.m. I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the we look forward to this opportunity The Reverend Ronald J. Nuzzi, Direc- United States of America, and to the Repub- every year when we have this chance to tor, ACE Leadership Program, Univer- lic for which it stands, one nation under God, visit with you and catch up on each sity of Notre Dame, offered the fol- indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. other’s lives. lowing prayer: f Every one of you has spent precious In every age, O Lord, You have been WARM WELCOME FOR THE years of your life, some of the best our refuge. So we seek Your wisdom REVEREND RONALD J. NUZZI years of your life, working to represent that justice may flow from our deeds. (Mr. RYAN of Ohio asked and was the needs and concerns of the Amer- Bless the work of our hands this day. ican people right here in this Chamber. By the power of Your outstretched given permission to address the House arm, open our eyes to see the needs of for 1 minute and to revise and extend Your commitment to your Nation did all who suffer, our ears to hear the cry his remarks.) not end when you left the halls of Con- of the poor, our hearts to feel the an- Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Delegation
    CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION McGowan Peak in the Sawtooth Mountain Range, part of the Sawtooth National Recreation Area established by Congress in 1972. Congressional Qualifications Method of Officer Selection Qualification Term of Office United States Elected by 30 years of age, Six years Senator greatest number U.S. citizen for at of votes in least 9 years and general election an Idaho resident. United States Elected by 25 years of age, Two years Congressman greatest number U.S. citizen for at of votes in least 7 years and general election an Idaho resident. 36 IDAHO BLUE BOOK Congressional Districts CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION 37 United States Senator Larry E. Craig Senator Craig was born on the family ranch near Midvale, Idaho, which was homesteaded in 1899 by his grandfather. He later served as the Idaho State President and National Vice-President of the Future Farmers of America. After graduating from the University of Idaho where he served as Student Body President and was a member of the Delta Chi fraternity, he pursued graduate studies before returning to the family ranching business in 1971. In 1974, the people of Payette and Washington counties sent him to the Idaho State Senate, where he served three terms before winning the 1980 race for Idaho’s 1st District Congressional Seat. He was re-elected four times before winning the U.S. Senate election in 1990 and was re-elected to the Senate in 1996 and 2002. He served as chairman of the Steering Committee, a legislative “think tank” and action group for Senate conservatives. He was the youngest senator ever elected to that position.
    [Show full text]
  • University News, October 27 Students of Boise State University
    Boise State University ScholarWorks Student Newspapers (UP 4.15) University Documents 10-27-1982 University News, October 27 Students of Boise State University Although this file was scanned from the highest-quality microfilm held by Boise State University, it reveals the limitations of the source microfilm. It is possible to perform a text search of much of this material; however, there are sections where the source microfilm was too faint or unreadable to allow for text scanning. For assistance with this collection of student newspapers, please contact Special Collections and Archives at [email protected]. , ' ". ' . - ...._--- -' '---..- . - " . .,c-···~~·.'~~~.'!'~~~;~':~~'#~c".~.,:_~~¥.~:"-'..;~..,-,- ..•....::.-;;·:_._·~::-,,"c"C-.;"'·~~:_..:.j~,·,.~·io'6:~.~!:'.:~:~-'·:;!..:~:~:;,~:";;;;.-;,<~:~.:-;~;'=.:;;,;:;'~:~':~::,,,-,~~:_,;~.~;--;:':,:=" • ',-', • '.' • ' • '. "'0 ~,." ,.,.. " .. \ " • '. ,_, '- ! ,.. \ • " '" " , ,'" . , ~ , '. I, ',,' "- ,", '. CtoshA * ~ \ Hallow4ten \ ' ,.. 'f Patty! ""--- __ --.;..._~ __ LlI- __ .,.:-...::..:._.._*~----.J* VOLUMEIl • 1SSUE-M- OCTOBER 27-NOVEMBER 2. 1982 Craig and LaRocco: Battle forthe House nedy's Administration's budget, which HE 1982 HOUSEof Representa- Larry LaRocco said. Iri a news release the capital base and creating jobs. allowed about 52 percent for defense and tive race is the most 'important October 20 he stated that today's budget about 27 percent for human resources, to off-year election in fifty years, deficit is more than double that of the Defense Spending President Reagan's Administration, which " said Mark Green in a Sept. 18 Carter Administration and that the deficit spends about 27 percent on defense and issue 'of The Nation. Historically, the has grown from less than $50 billion in 1980 "Defense spending dead-ends in the' .about 52 percent on human resources. average number of congressional seats to about $122 billion for 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 110 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 110 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 154 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, APRIL 17, 2008 No. 61 House of Representatives The House met at 8:30 a.m. and was in the long watches of the night in honor on behalf of Speaker PELOSI, called to order by the Speaker pro tem- places far from home. Bring them sol- Leader BOEHNER and myself to wel- pore (Mr. HOYER). ace in times of deep loneliness and come not only former colleagues but f hope for a joyous homecoming. very good friends. I am particularly May we all know Your peace that pleased to recognize the former Speak- DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER passes understanding, Your hope that er of the House, Bob Michel. I know PRO TEMPORE sustains us in times of trial, and Your that’s technically not accurate. I tried The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- love that fills the deepest recesses of to get him the votes to get that office, fore the House the following commu- our hearts. but another person intervened. But we nication from the Speaker: We pray in the Name that is above are certainly pleased to recognize and every name. Amen. WASHINGTON, DC, welcome back the distinguished minor- April 17, 2008. f ity leader to the House, a good friend. I, of course, somewhat parochial, par- I hereby appoint the Honorable STENY H. THE JOURNAL HOYER to act as Speaker pro tempore on this ticularly want to recognize my good day.
    [Show full text]