Mercury, Membrane Or Diaphragm Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mercury, Membrane Or Diaphragm Introduction Mercury, membrane or diaphragm Introduction The chloro-alkali industry is a major branch of the chemical industry. Its primary products are chlorine, sodium hydroxide and hydrogen which are produced from rock salt, a readily accessible raw material. This interactive teaching unit is concerned with the different manufacturing processes used to produce these materials. These involve electrochemical cells and, as such, this represents an exercise in applied electrochemistry. Throughout the unit you are required to operate in small groups acting as a design team and are asked to devise the optimum operational arrangement for a particular process. This will require an understanding of the basic electrochemical processes but, in addition, an awareness of economic and environmental issues will also be required. The top 10 chemicals production for the US for 1989 is shown in Table 1. Chlorine and sodium hydroxide were the 8th and 9th largest volume chemicals respectively for that year. Figure 1 shows the chlorine and sodium hydroxide production since 1960 and shows recent output to be roughly constant at ca. 10 million tons. Collectively these data show these materials to be in high demand and that the volumes involved are large. In fact the world-wide manufacturing capacity for each of these chemicals is approximately 40 million tonnes per year i.e. chloro- alkali production is big business. Table 1 US top 10 chemicals production (1989) 106 t 1. Sulfuric acid 39.4 2. Nitrogen 24.4 3. Oxygen 17.1 4. Ethylene 15.9 5. Ammonia 15.3 6. Lime 15.0 7. Phosphoric acid 10.5 8. Chlorine 10.8 9. Sodium 11.3 hydroxide 10 Propylene 9.2 . 14 12 10 8 t 6 10 6 Annual Chlorine Capacity 4 Caustic Soda 2 Production Chlorine Production 0 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 Year TASK 1 Given this large demand for chlorine, sodium hydroxide and hydrogen, what do you think are the market outlets for these bulk chemicals? Form into your sub-groups (e.g. A1, A2, A3, etc.) and together answer the following questions. 1. Describe the principal uses of chlorine, sodium hydroxide and hydrogen. 2. Chlorine is a highly corrosive gas that is difficult to handle. What would be the best way to supply chlorine to the market outlets you have identified in Question 1? Figure A Unit 2 Class Distrib Section Exercise LT (Whole cla 1. Introduction to class 2. Divide class into sub-groups and move to smaller A B C rooms ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ 3. Introduction to unit A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 C C 1 2 4. Background Information ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ 5. Design teams A1, A2, A3, B1, B2, etc. ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ 6. Design team technical presentations (speaker 1) A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 C C 1 2 7. Design team marketing presentations (speaker 2) A B 8. Sub-group discussion. Preparation of summary acetate (speaker 3) 9. Return to LT 10. Plenary session. Sub-group presentation (speaker LT 3) 11. Assessment Unit 2 Timetable Table A Time Section Exercise Duration (mins) 14.00 1 Introduction to class. Administration 10 14.10 Video 1 5 14.15 2 Divide class into sub-groups A, B, C and D and 5 move to smaller rooms 14.20 3 Introduction to unit Read 5 Task 1 5 Discuss 5 14.35 4 Background Information (green) Read 5 Tutor Summary 5 Group Discuss 5 14.50 5 Design Teams Task 2 Initial Information Read and Discuss 5 + 10 Further Information Read and Discuss 5 + 5 Complete Cell Diagrams Discuss 10 15.25 6 Design teams technical presentations 10 (speaker 1) 15.35 7 Design teams discussion. 10 Design teams marketing presentations 10 (speaker 2) 15.50 8 Sub-group discussion 10 Preparation of summary acetate Preferred choice of cell 16.00 9 Return to lecture theatre 5 16.05 10 Plenary session Sub-group presentation 5 Electrochemical cell performance 5 Video 2 5 Slides 5 Summary 10 16.35 11 Assessment 5 16.40 End BACKGROUND INFORMATION Chlorine consumption is a major indicator of industrial activity. It is used as a disinfectant, in water treatment and in processing pulp and paper. Large quantities of chlorine are needed for polyvinyl chloride (about 15 million tonnes per year in 1990), an important material in the building industry as well as for consumer goods. Chlorine is not readily transported or stored in quantity. In many processes, its production forms part of an integrated petrochemicals/plastics complex where it is used immediately on production. Sodium hydroxide has wide applications in mineral processing, the pulp/paper industry as well as textile and glass manufacturing. Hydrogen is used as a chemical feedstock or can be integrated with other hydrogen plants. Electrolytically produced hydrogen is very pure and can be compressed to around 200 atmospheres for transportation in cylinders for a variety of uses. Market Outlets for Sodium Hydroxide Chemicals Rayon Soap Alumina Neutralisation Pulp Paper Other 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Percentage of Production Market Oultets for Chlorine Vinylchloride Solvents Propylene Oxide Chloromethanes Inorganics Pulp Paper Other 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Percentage of Production Industrial processes in the past In 1870, there were two main manufacturing routes to chlorine. The Weldon process (1), involving the oxidation of hydrochloric acid with manganese dioxide, competed with the Deacon process (2) in which hydrochloric acid was oxidised by air over a copper based catalyst. 4HCl + MnO2 → MnCl2 + 2H2O + Cl2 (1) 4HCl + O2 Cu(cat) 2H2O + 2Cl2 (2) Early nineteenth century production of sodium hydroxide used the LeBlanc process. This amazing process involved burning coal, sodium sulfate (made from salt and sulfuric acid) and calcium carbonate together in the ratio 35:100:100, extracting the product and treating the black liquor with calcium hydroxide to form dilute sodium hydroxide solution. In 1861, the Solvay process was introduced to make sodium carbonate from sodium chloride and calcium carbonate by means of a multi-step synthesis. The sodium carbonate was then converted to sodium hydroxide by reaction with lime. This process competed with the Leblanc process until electrolytic routes became dominant in the 1930s. Modern production involves electrolytic routes only. Industrial processes today Sodium chloride, often referred to as rock salt, is the raw material required for electrolysis and occurs naturally in plentiful supplies. In the UK there are large deposits in Cheshire, where it is mined (see video 1). During the electrolysis of brine (sodium chloride solution), chlorine, hydrogen and sodium hydroxide are formed at the same time, the overall equation being: 2NaCl + 2H2O → Cl2(g) + 2NaOH(aq) + H2(g) This means that the three products are formed in a fixed ratio. Chlorine demand is traditionally the factor which governs the chlor-alkali industry. However, the amount of co-produced sodium hydroxide may or may not satisfy the demand. Thus, sodium hydroxide prices can vary greatly: a shortfall leads to higher prices while, with a production excess, prices move downwards. During the 1980s, the lowest price was $40 per tonne and the highest $500 per tonne. This range of prices illustrates one of the difficulties in managing the process in such a way that it is economic. The process of electrolysis When electrodes are inserted in a solution of electrolyte and a potential difference applied, chemical reactions can be observed at the electrodes. The anode is defined as the electrode at which oxidation occurs, while reduction occurs at the cathode. The two processes can be represented by the following equations: Reduction at the cathode Electron Flow C+ + e- → C Oxidation at the anode A- → A + e- The problem with electrolysis Cathode (-) Anode (+) In the process, three products are produced. It is vital that these are not allowed to mix. Thus, a requirement of a commercial cell for the electrolysis of brine is that it separates the three products effectively. Electrolysis in a simple vessel (described as a ‘one-pot’ vessel) leads to the reaction of chlorine with sodium hydroxide to C+ A- give unwanted sodium hypochlorite (NaClO), sodium chlorate (NaClO3) and oxygen by the following reactions: - - Cl2 + OH → Cl + HOCl HOCl → H+ + OCl- - - - + 2HOCl + OCl → ClO3 + 2Cl + 2H - - 4OH → O2 + 2H2O + 4e Thus, in a commercial cell, sodium hypochlorite, sodium chlorate and oxygen could be formed as bi-products. There are three main approaches in designing such a cell. Each seeks to produce the three products in such a way that reaction between them cannot occur. The three cell types are the mercury cell, the membrane cell and the diaphragm cell. Your Task Working in your design teams (e.g. A1), you will be given information on ONE of the cell types that might be used. Your task is to work out how the cell could work and to examine its strengths and weaknesses in the production of pure products. The mercury cell – Initial information You are a team of chemists asked to study an industrial electrochemical process. A cell has been proposed that will convert brine (sodium chloride solution) into chlorine, hydrogen and sodium hydroxide as separate products. Given the following chemical equations and materials suggest how such a cell could be used to produce the desired products. The relevant equations are: - - 2Cl → Cl2 + 2e Na+ + e- → Na Na + Hg → Na/Hg (sodium amalgam, a dense liquid) 2Na/Hg + 2H2O → 2NaOH + H2(g) + 2Hg (slow reaction) The appropriate chemicals and equipment: Aqueous sodium chloride, mercury, water, coated titanium electrode, a supply of electricity and an electrochemical reactor of the following general design: The main vessel is equipped with inlet 2 and outlet 2 for liquid at the bottom. It is also equipped with inlet 1 and outlet 1 at a higher level.
Recommended publications
  • History of the Chlor-Alkali Industry
    2 History of the Chlor-Alkali Industry During the last half of the 19th century, chlorine, used almost exclusively in the textile and paper industry, was made [1] by reacting manganese dioxide with hydrochloric acid 100–110◦C MnO2 + 4HCl −−−−−−→ MnCl2 + Cl2 + 2H2O (1) Recycling of manganese improved the overall process economics, and the process became known as the Weldon process [2]. In the 1860s, the Deacon process, which generated chlorine by direct catalytic oxidation of hydrochloric acid with air according to Eq. (2) was developed [3]. ◦ 450–460 C;CuCl2 cat. 4HCl + O2(air) −−−−−−−−−−−−−−→ 2Cl2 + 2H2O(2) The HCl required for reactions (1) and (2) was available from the manufacture of soda ash by the LeBlanc process [4,5]. H2SO4 + 2NaCl → Na2SO4 + 2HCl (3) Na2SO4 + CaCO3 + 2C → Na2CO3 + CaS + 2CO2 (4) Utilization of HCl from reaction (3) eliminated the major water and air pollution problems of the LeBlanc process and allowed the generation of chlorine. By 1900, the Weldon and Deacon processes generated enough chlorine for the production of about 150,000 tons per year of bleaching powder in England alone [6]. An important discovery during this period was the fact that steel is immune to attack by dry chlorine [7]. This permitted the first commercial production and distribu- tion of dry liquid chlorine by Badische Anilin-und-Soda Fabrik (BASF) of Germany in 1888 [8,9]. This technology, using H2SO4 for drying followed by compression of the gas and condensation by cooling, is much the same as is currently practiced. 17 “chap02” — 2005/5/2 — 09Brie:49 — page 17 — #1 18 CHAPTER 2 In the latter part of the 19th century, the Solvay process for caustic soda began to replace the LeBlanc process.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Chlor-Alkali Manufacturing Industry December 2001
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Chlor-Alkali Manufacturing industry December 2001 Executive summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This reference document on best available techniques in the chlor-alkali industry reflects an information exchange carried out according to Article 16(2) of Council Directive 96/61/EC. The document has to be seen in the light of the preface which describes the objectives of the document and its use. The chlor-alkali industry The chlor-alkali industry is the industry that produces chlorine (Cl2) and alkali, sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or potassium hydroxide (KOH), by electrolysis of a salt solution. The main technologies applied for chlor-alkali production are mercury, diaphragm and membrane cell electrolysis, mainly using sodium chloride (NaCl) as feed or to a lesser extent using potassium chloride (KCl) for the production of potassium hydroxide. The diaphragm cell process (Griesheim cell, 1885) and the mercury cell process (Castner- Kellner cell, 1892) were both introduced in the late 1800s. The membrane cell process was developed much more recently (1970). Each of these processes represents a different method of keeping the chlorine produced at the anode separate from the caustic soda and hydrogen produced, directly or indirectly, at the cathode. Currently, 95% of world chlorine production is obtained by the chlor-alkali process. The geographic distribution of chlor-alkali processes world-wide differs appreciably (production capacity of chlorine): - western Europe, predominance of mercury cell process (June 2000): 55% - United States, predominance of diaphragm cell process: 75% - Japan, predominance of membrane cell process: >90% The remaining chlorine production capacity in western Europe consists of (June 2000) diaphragm cell process 22%, membrane cell process 20% and other processes 3%.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Protection Agency
    Friday, December 19, 2003 Part II Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 63 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Mercury Emissions from Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Plants; Final Rule VerDate jul<14>2003 15:14 Dec 18, 2003 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\19DER2.SGM 19DER2 70904 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 244 / Friday, December 19, 2003 / Rules and Regulations ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION types of sources (usually in the Information or other information whose AGENCY elemental or inorganic forms) transports disclosure is restricted by statute. through the atmosphere and eventually The official public docket is the 40 CFR Part 63 deposits onto land or water bodies. collection of materials that is available [OAR–2002–0017; FRL–7551–5] When mercury is deposited to surface for public viewing. The EPA Docket waters, natural processes (bacterial) can RIN 2060–AE85 Center Public Reading Room is open transform some of the mercury into from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday methylmercury that accumulates in fish. through Friday, excluding legal National Emission Standards for Ingestion is the primary exposure route Hazardous Air Pollutants: Mercury holidays. The telephone number for the of interest for methylmercury. The Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and Emissions From Mercury Cell Chlor- health effect of greatest concern due to Alkali Plants the telephone number for the Air Docket methylmercury is neurotoxicity, is (202) 566–1742. AGENCY: Environmental Protection particularly with respect to fetuses and Agency (EPA). young children. Electronic Docket Access. You may access the final rule electronically ACTION: Final rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimization of Electrolysis Parameters for Green Sanitation Chemicals Production Using Response Surface Methodology
    processes Article Optimization of Electrolysis Parameters for Green Sanitation Chemicals Production Using Response Surface Methodology Nurul Izzah Khalid 1 , Nurul Shaqirah Sulaiman 1 , Norashikin Ab Aziz 1,2,* , Farah Saleena Taip 1, Shafreeza Sobri 3 and Nor-Khaizura Mahmud Ab Rashid 4 1 Department of Process and Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; [email protected] (N.I.K.); [email protected] (N.S.S.); [email protected] (F.S.T.) 2 Halal Products Research Institute, University Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang 43300, Selangor, Malaysia 3 Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; [email protected] 4 Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +603-9769-4302 Received: 22 May 2020; Accepted: 10 June 2020; Published: 6 July 2020 Abstract: Electrolyzed water (EW) shows great potential as a green and economical sanitation solution for the food industry. However, only limited studies have investigated the optimum electrolysis parameters and the bactericidal effect of acidic electrolyzed water (AcEW) and alkaline electrolyzed water (AlEW). Here, the Box–Behnken experimental design was used to identify the optimum parameters. The tests were conducted with different types of electrodes, electrical voltages, electrolysis times, and NaCl concentrations. There were no obvious differences observed in the physico-chemical properties of EW when different electrodes were used. However, stainless steel was chosen as it meets most of the selection criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Chlor-Alkali Manufact
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Chlor-Alkali Manufacturing Industry December 2001 i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This reference document on best available techniques in the chlor-alkali industry reflects an information exchange carried out according to Article 16(2) of Council Directive 96/61/EC. The document has to be seen in the light of the preface which describes the objectives of the document and its use. The chlor-alkali industry The chlor-alkali industry is the industry that produces chlorine (Cl2) and alkali, sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or potassium hydroxide (KOH), by electrolysis of a salt solution. The main technologies applied for chlor-alkali production are mercury, diaphragm and membrane cell electrolysis, mainly using sodium chloride (NaCl) as feed or to a lesser extent using potassium chloride (KCl) for the production of potassium hydroxide. The diaphragm cell process (Griesheim cell, 1885) and the mercury cell process (Castner- Kellner cell, 1892) were both introduced in the late 1800s. The membrane cell process was developed much more recently (1970). Each of these processes represents a different method of keeping the chlorine produced at the anode separate from the caustic soda and hydrogen produced, directly or indirectly, at the cathode. Currently, 95% of world chlorine production is obtained by the chlor-alkali process. The geographic distribution of chlor-alkali processes world-wide differs appreciably (production capacity of chlorine): - western Europe, predominance of mercury cell process (June 2000): 55% - United States, predominance of diaphragm cell process: 75% - Japan, predominance of membrane cell process: >90% The remaining chlorine production capacity in western Europe consists of (June 2000) diaphragm cell process 22%, membrane cell process 20% and other processes 3%.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury Fact Sheet
    National Mercury Testing Program The Rise of Mercury Pollution its way into our lakes and rivers. Once in the water, toxic mercury is absorbed through the fat and muscle tissue of There is growing concern and scientific evidence that many animals like fish. Americans are being exposed to harmful levels of mercury pollution. However, the Bush administration is failing to Most people are exposed to mercury by consuming the polluted protect Americans from this dangerous toxin. Instead, the fish. As a result, federal and state governments warn people to administration has proposed to delay for 10 to 20 years and limit the consumption of certain species of fish and fish caught weaken the first national law that would clean up mercury from in waters that are contaminated with mercury. power plants, the single largest source of mercury in the country. This is in stark contrast from what was originally People that work in industries that regularly handle mercury proposed and what is achievable now, even by the (dentistry, thermometer production) or deal with high level of Environmental Protection Agencys own previous analysis: a mercury emissions (electricity generation primarily through coal, chlorine production through chlor-akali facilities, 90 percent reduction in mercury pollution by 2008. insecticides, etc.) are also at an increased risk for exposure to mercury pollution. What is Mercury and Who is Affected by Mercury Pollution? The Food and Drug Administration is charged with the protection of the public from mercury in store-bought fish. Mercury is a neurotoxin that is most often seen as a by-product Unfortunately their recommendations are vague and provide from industrial processes like power plants, incinerators and insufficient information to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Eco Profile on Chlorine
    An Eco-profile and Environmental Product Declaration of the European Chlor-Alkali Industry Chlorine (The chlor-alkali process) Euro Chlor September 2013 - Synthesis 1 Introduction Allocation method Stoichiometric allocation for Salt, mass allocation for all other input This Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) is and emissions. Sensitivity analysis based upon life cycle inventory (LCI) data from for other allocation methods was performed. Euro Chlor’s member companies. It has been prepared according to the rules of Description of the Product and the PlasticsEurope’s LCI Methodology “Eco-profiles Production Process and Environmental Declarations” (version 2.0, This Eco-profile and EPD represents the European April 2011). EPDs provide environmental average industrial production of chlorine, sodium performance data, but no information on the hydroxide, hydrogen, and sodium hypochlorite by economic and social aspects, which would be chlor-alkali electrolysis from cradle to gate. necessary for a complete sustainability assessment. Further, they do not imply a value Production Process judgment between environmental criteria. Salt (NaCl) recovered from various sources (rock This EPD describes the production of chlorine by salt, solar salt, solution-mined brine, vacuum chlor-alkali electrolysis from cradle to gate (from salt) is dissolved in water and the resulting brine production of salt/brine to liquid chlorine, is purified and fed to the electrolysis unit where sodium hydroxide, and hypochlorite at plant). the brine is electrochemically decomposed into Please keep in mind that comparisons cannot chlorine, hydrogen, and sodium hydroxide. Three be made on the level of the chemicals alone: it different electrolysis techniques are applied: is necessary to consider the full life cycle of an mercury, diaphragm, and membrane cell application in order to compare the performance technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury Use: Chemical Manufacturers/Users
    210 DRAFT WISCONSIN MERCURY SOURCEBOOK: CHEMICAL ▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼ MERCURY USE: Table of Contents About This Handout ........................... 211 CHEMICAL Why Should I Be Concerned About Mercury? ............................................. 212 MANUFACTURERS/USERS Keeping Mercury Out of Wastewater . 214 Sewer Pipes ......................................... 214 Mercury compounds are used in a wide variety of settings by chemical Mercury-Containing Compounds ...... 214 Work by the MPCA ............................. 214 manufacturers. Chemical uses of mercury may occur in catalysts, Mercury-Containing Chemicals and cosmetics, explosives, fireworks, livestock and poultry remedies, Alternatives ......................................... 215 packaging, pharmaceuticals, pigments and dyes, poisons, preservatives, Work by The Massachusetts Water Resources Authority ............................ 215 and special paper coatings. Commonly used mercury compounds include Results from 75 Priority Samples ...... 216 mercuric oxide (cathode material in batteries), mercuric chloride Caustic Soda ....................................... 217 (pharmaceuticals), phenylmercuric acetate (used in paints and Case study: Potlatch Corporation ..... 219 pharmaceuticals) mercuric sulfide (used in red pigment and other Action Ideas to Consider .................... 220 pharmaceuticals), and thimerosal (contact lens solutions) [ross and Bibliography ....................................... 220 associates]. Most of the mercury- containing
    [Show full text]
  • 1.6-MB PDF File
    The Materials Flow of Mercury in the Economies of the United States and the World By John L. Sznopek and Thomas G. Goonan U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1197 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Bruce Babbitt, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director Version 1.0 This report is only available on line at http://greenwood. cr.usgs.gov/pub/circulars/c1197/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government . Published in the Central Region, Denver Colorado Manuscript approved for publication June 14, 2000 Edited by Lorna Carter Photo composition by William E. Sowers Graphics by William E. Sowers Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgments .............................................................................................................................. 3 Mercury Flow Analysis........................................................................................................................ 3 Domestic ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Emissions to the Environment ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The European Chlor-Alkali Industry: an Electricity Intensive Sector Exposed to Carbon Leakage
    Brussels, December 2010 The European Chlor-Alkali industry: an electricity intensive sector exposed to carbon leakage The revised EU ETS (Emission Trading Scheme) Directive 2009/29/EC will have financial consequences for all energy-intensive industries. The chlor-alkali industry is in particular exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage due to CO 2 costs passed through in the electricity prices. The Directive recognises the need to avoid carbon leakage whilst at the same time fulfilling the climate change objective of reducing CO 2 emissions and, consequently, it allows Member States to adopt financial measures to compensate energy-intensive sectors for the additional costs of carbon passed through in electricity prices. This document aims at explaining why and how the chlor-alkali industry is highly impacted by the EU Emission Trading Scheme. 1. The chlor-alkali industry 1.1. The importance of the European chlor-alkali industry Chlorine and caustic soda are basic building blocks for thousands of useful substances and products. The chlor-alkali industry underpins about 55% of the European chemicals and pharmaceuticals industry which realised in 2009 a turnover of almost 660 billion euro. About 20 million tonnes of chlorine, caustic soda and hydrogen are produced each year at 76 manufacturing sites in 22 European countries. The chlor-alkali sector employs about 39,000 people. About two thirds of European chlorine production is used in engineering materials – polymers, resins and elastomers. The largest single end use (35%) is PVC plastic for primarily the construction, automotive, electronic and electrical industries. The manufacturing processes of many chemicals, plastics and medicines use chlorine, although the end product is chlorine-free, such as the plastics polyurethane and polycarbonate which have increasing numbers of applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Salt In, Salt Out
    chapter 2 Salt In, Salt Out Following their organizational meeting in November 1917, Yongli’s promoters began work on two Herculean tasks: searching for a plant design while raising the needed capital. In the process, problems of technology transfer, shifting government policy, and limitations of China’s capital market plagued them. Yongli’s challenge of Brunner, Mond’s formidable hold on the “well regulated” market and technology was both risky and difficult, which in turn made the task of raising the necessary capital even more daunting as it battled the Rev- enue Inspectorate over the gabelle waiver. Problems of Technology Transfer As Chen Diaofu and his colleagues demonstrated in Fan Xudong’s backyard, the chemistry behind the Solvay process was a public good. However, the engineering to make it work on an industrial scale was not.1 Sodium chloride (salt), one of the three main raw materials for the process, must be purified as a solution cleared of dirt, magnesium, and other impurities. The other essential chemical, ammonia, could be generated through burning coke, or added in liquid form. Reaction is then carried out by passing the concentrated and purified brine through the first of two absorption towers. Ammonia bubbles up to saturate the brine (NaCl + NH3, Step I). Separately, carbon dioxide is produced by heating limestone in a kiln at 950–1100°C. The calcium carbonate (CaCO3) in the limestone, the third main ingredient, is partially converted to quicklime (calcium oxide, CaO) and carbon dioxide: CaCO 3 → CO 2 + CaO ( Step II) The carbon dioxide and ammoniacal brine are then fed into a second tower for carbonation.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Is Life Disinfection Is Health the Disinfectant Our Product the Process the Preferred Application
    Being responsible is our foundation Thinking ahead makes it possible GRUNDFOS WATER TREATMENT Innovation is the essence Complete range of disinfectants from a single source Water is life Disinfection is health The disinfectant Our product The process The preferred application Chlorine gas Vaccuperm Vacuum chlorine gas Drinking water: VGA-111/-113/-117 dosing Independent water supply VGB-103 Waste water: Industrial waste water up to 10 kg/h Public swimming pools Vaccuperm Fully automatic Drinking water: Municipal waterworks VGS 140 vacuum chlorine gas Waste water: dosing up to 200 kg/h Municipal sewage purification plants Onsite generation of Selcoperm SES Electrolytic Drinking water: sodium hypochlorite chlorine production up to 2 kg/h Independent water supply Waste water: Industrial waste water higher capacities on request Public swimming pools Marine - application specific Chlorine dioxide Oxiperm Chlorite / hydrochloric Drinking water: Municipal waterworks OCD-164 acid (diluted or Food and drinks industry: OCC-164 concentrated) or Brewing water, bottle washing, CIP OCG-166 chlorite/chlorine systems, etc. up to 10 kg/h Cooling circuit water Oxiperm Chlorite / hydrochloric Drinking water: Hotels, hospitals, OCD-162 acid (diluted) retirement homes, protection against up to 60 g/h legionella Shower facilities in swimming pools Cooling circuit water ++++ chlorine ++++ chlorine electrolysis ++++ chlorine dioxide ++++ Commercial buildings 15.890006 96737386 www.grundfosalldos.com Chlorine gas Chlorine Chlorine dioxide Vaccuperm Selcoperm Oxiperm® Chlorine gas systems Onsite generation Chlorine dioxide systems - saves time and operating costs. Chlorine – the no. 1 disinfectant worldwide % HCIO % CI2, % CIO Electrolytic production and dosing of sodium The disinfectant is dosed from the buffer tank directly into Chlorine dioxide – effective even against biofilms the piping system with a dosing pump.
    [Show full text]