DOCSLIB.ORG

Crafting Donor Agreements That Withstand the Test of Time

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Crafting Donor Agreements That Withstand the Test of Time CRAFTING DONOR AGREEMENTS THAT WITHSTAND THE TEST OF TIME ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. • What We Will Cover Today: • Problems that Arise - Case Examples • The Law • What To Include in an Agreement • How to Resolve Issues that Do Arise ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 1 CASE LAW EXAMPLES ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 2 Ebenezer's Old People's Home of Evangelical Ass'n of Ebenezer, N.Y. • "In the event there is an institution in the City of South Bend at the time of my death or within two years after the time of my death, which has for its purpose of its existence the maintenance of a home for old people irrespective of their religious beliefs upon at least a partial charitable basis then I desire and direct my said executor to turn all the rest and residue of the property of which I may die seized to said institution." • Ebenezer's Old People's Home of Evangelical Ass'n of Ebenezer, N.Y. v. South Bend Old People's Home, Inc., 48 N.E.2d 851, 854, 48 N.E. 2d 851 (1943) ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 3 Ebenezer's Old People's Home of Evangelical Ass'n of Ebenezer, N.Y. • If no such institution exists in South Bend at my death or two years later, the residue is to be distributed between two homes for senior citizens and an orphanage, all identified by name, as takers in default. • After a hearing, the South Bend Old People’s Home, Inc. was selected as the recipient of the gift. ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 4 Ebenezer's Old People's Home of Evangelical Ass'n of Ebenezer, N.Y. • The South Bend Old People’s Home, Inc. never incorporated and never acquired other assets. • Default takers filed suit to have the assets transferred to them. ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 5 Ebenezer's Old People's Home of Evangelical Ass'n of Ebenezer, N.Y. • Court Holding: • The Gift was Outright and Fully Vested • It was "nothing more than a gift to a charitable institution in whose purposes and objects he was sympathetic." ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 6 Ebenezer's Old People's Home of Evangelical Ass'n of Ebenezer, N.Y. • Court Holding: • “The true rule is that--'conditions subsequent, having the effect in case of a breach to defeat estates already vested, are not favored in law, and hence always receive a strict construction.' A condition subsequent will not be raised by implication from a mere declaration in the deed that the grant is made for a special purpose, without being qualified with words to make such a condition." ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 7 Matter of Booker • Leon C. Booker created a trust in 1969 with approximately $700,000. • Purpose: “[T]o construct, fully equip and furnish a forty (40) bed Rest Home in the City of Dayton, Columbia County, Washington . .” • To have 20 single patient rooms, 10 double patient rooms, each with private bath and bathtub. Several other specific requirements. • “To be constructed so that it is adjoining or attached to the Columbia County General Hospital . .” Matter of the Trust of Booker, 37 Wash. App. 708, 682 P.2d 320 (1984) ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 8 Matter of Booker • Contemplated accumulation of assets over time, that bids would be received, and when “reasonably certain” that the trust is sufficient, the hospital district is to be apprised to see if it will take on the project. • If the hospital district “does not desire the Rest Home, refuses to agree to construct, equip and furnish the Rest Home in the manner directed herein or at any time should the Trustee absolutely determine it is impossible to accomplish the Trust charitable residuary purpose,” the funds are to pass to the alternate beneficiary - St. Mary Community Hospital in Walla Walla. ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 9 Matter of Booker • Hospital district filed a petition seeking an interpretation of the terms of the trust. The alternate taker also filed a petition asking that the trust benefits be given to them if the district did not proceed as provided in the trust. • Lower Court: Allowed deviation from the terms to construct fewer units with fewer beds among other things. • Alternate taker appeals - on basis the trust has a specific intent that there be a gift over if the stated purpose is impossible to accomplish, including the accumulation of adequate funds to construct the home as specifically directed. ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 10 Matter of Booker • Court Holding: • The trust fund vested immediately on the death of Mr. Booker. The charitable purpose was to construct a rest home. That purpose can still be accomplished, so the trust does not fail. • Deviation was appropriate as it is reasonably necessary in effectuating the primary purpose of the trust. • “Noncompliance with detail provisions of a trust does not give rise to a transfer to the alternate beneficiary as such provisions are not of controlling importance. (Citing Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Quincy, 357 Mass. 521, 258 N.E. 2d 745, 753 (1970).) ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 11 Niemann v. Vaughn Community Church • In 1956, the Emmanuel Congregational Church of Vaughn deeded property to the Vaughn Community Church “with the stipulation that the property shall forever remain for the perpetual use of Protestant Evangelical Churches of the Community of Vaughn.” • The Church grew dramatically. In 1999, 79% of the congregation voted in favor of selling the property and using the proceeds to construct a new church on another parcel of property. • Suit was brought by Niemann, a parishioner at the Vaughn Community Church, to enjoin the church from selling the property. Niemann v. Vaughn Community Church, 154 Wn2d 365, 113 P.3d 463 (2005) ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 12 Niemann v. Vaughn Community Church • Trial Court Holding: • The deed created a charitable trust, with the Vaughn Community Church as the primary beneficiary. • Found the overriding and dominant intent in conveying the property was to “assist and ensure the continuation of the Protestant evangelical ministries of the Vaughn community through VCC, regardless of where they were specifically located . .” • Applied (without distinction) the doctrines of cy pres and equitable deviation to modify the deed to allow the sale and the use of proceeds to finance a new church. ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 13 Niemann v. Vaughn Community Church • Court of Appeals Holding: Affirmed ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 14 Niemann v. Vaughn Community Church • Supreme Court Holding: • The determination that the deed created a charitable trust was not appealed, so that ruling stands. • Applied the doctrine of equitable deviation and upheld the trial court’s modification of the deed. • NOTE: Justice Madsen’s concurring and dissenting opinion - the deed conveyed a fee simple absolute and no trust was created. ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 15 Matter of the 1934 Deed to Camp Kilworth • In 1934 land was deeded to the Boy Scouts of America on the “express conditions that [the Boy Scouts] shall never convey, lease or encumber said premises . and shall never allow the same to come into the possession of any other party.” • The deed provided that if the condition was violated, the property was to revert to the grantors or their heirs. Matter of the 1934 Deed to Camp Kilworth, 149 Wash. App. 82, 201 P.3d 416 (2009) ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 16 Matter of the 1934 Deed to Camp Kilworth • In 2006 the Boy Scouts petitioned to remove the reversionary clause and use the proceeds to fund other Boy Scout camps on the basis that this was a trust and the court could modify the trust under the doctrine of equitable deviation. • Trial Court Holding: The petition was granted and the reversionary clause was removed from the deed. ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 17 Matter of the 1934 Deed to Camp Kilworth • Court of Appeals Holding: • Trust relationship is created where one party grants, with inent, property to a second party, the trustee, for the benefit of a third party. • Granting a gift does not establish a trust relationship if there was no intention to do so. • An interest subject to a condition subsequent is not, because of the condition, held in trust. Restatement (Second) of Trusts §2 (1959) ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 18 Matter of the 1934 Deed to Camp Kilworth • Court of Appeals Holding: • Held - no trust was created. The deed was a conveyance subject to a condition and was not subject to revision. • COMPARE decision in Niemann v. Vaughn ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 19 WHAT IS THE LAW? ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 20 CY PRES ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 21 Cy Pres • Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 399 (1959) • If property is placed in trust for a particular charitable purpose, and it is or becomes impossible, impracticable or illegal to carry out the particular purpose, and if a more general charitable intention is also expressed, the court will direct the application of the property to some charitable purpose which falls within the general charitable intention of the settlor. ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 22 Cy Pres • Restatement (Third) of Trusts § 67 (2003) • Extends the doctrine to circumstances where it would be wasteful to carry out the particular stated purpose. ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 23 Cy Pres • Must find: • Specific purpose gift • It is now impossible, impracticable, illegal or wasteful to carry out the specific purpose • General charitable intent ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 24 Cy Pres • Traditionally cy pres only applies to charitable gifts in trust • Some courts now apply cy pres concepts to outright gifts and other charitable interests ©2014 Stokes Lawrence, P.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Personal Representative Handbook
    2410 W. Ray Rd., Suite 1 • Chandler, Arizona 85224 • 480-345-8845 • www.halaw.com Personal Representative Handbook The purpose of this handbook is to assist you in carrying out your case, whoever the decedent nominated to act as personal rep- duties as the Personal Representative (or Executor) of an estate of resentative in the Will has the right to serve. an Arizona decedent. This handbook is updated from time to time; Bear in mind, though, that just because you may have please contact us if you are not sure you have the latest version. been nominated to serve as personal representative in some- Also, please remember that this handbook is a guide; it is not in- one’s Will does not mean you have a duty to accept that nom- tended to answer every question that could come up in the admin- ination. You can always decline, in which case any alternate istration of a trust, and it is not intended to give you legal advice. candidate nominated in the Decedent’s Will would then have the opportunity to serve as personal representative. INTRODUCTION Conversely, if the Decedent died without a valid Will, the Decedent is said to have died intestate. In that case, state law What Is a Personal Representative? In Arizona, a personal (in Arizona, A.R.S. § 14-3203) controls who has the right to representative (known in many states as an executor) is the per- serve as personal representative. Roughly summarized, the son or entity appointed by the Court to administer the estate people having the right to serve as personal representative and assets of someone who has died (a decedent).
    [Show full text]
  • The Personal Representative's Power to Sell Realty in Virginia
    William & Mary Law Review Volume 15 (1973-1974) Issue 4 Article 8 May 1974 The Personal Representative's Power to Sell Realty in Virginia Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr Part of the Estates and Trusts Commons Repository Citation The Personal Representative's Power to Sell Realty in Virginia, 15 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 949 (1974), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol15/iss4/8 Copyright c 1974 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr COMMENT THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S POWER TO SELL REALTY IN VIRGINIA At common law, tide to personal property passed to an executor or administrator upon the death of the owner, while tide to realty vested immediately in the decedent's heirs or devisees.' During the period of administration, the personal representative's control over personalty was, and under present law remains, analogous to that of a trustee, there being few restrictions upon the power to dispose of the property for the benefit of the estate. With respect to realty, however, a personal representative at common law had neither tide nor power to sell. Two general exceptions to the common law rules have evolved to expand the personal representative's power ovex realty. First, realty may be subjected by statute to the payment of debts of the estate when the personalty is insufficient for that purpose. Second, and more sig- nificantly, an executor may sell realty when vested with such power by the will.3 This Comment will examine the development and present status in Virginia of these exceptions to the general rule against sale 'of realty by a personal representative and will suggest statutory reforms designed to bring Virginia law more in line with that in other jurisdic- tions in reflecting modem conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Last-Will-And-Testament-Template.Pdf
    Last Will and Testament of ___________________________________ I, ________________________, resident in the City of ____________________, County of ____________________, State of ____________________, being of sound mind, not acting under duress or undue influence, and fully understanding the nature and extent of all my property and of this disposition thereof, do hereby make, publish, and declare this document to be my Last Will and Testament, and hereby revoke any and all other wills and codicils heretofore made by me. I. EXPENSES & TAXES I direct that all my debts, and expenses of my last illness, funeral, and burial, be paid as soon after my death as may be reasonably convenient, and I hereby authorize my Personal Representative, hereinafter appointed, to settle and discharge, in his or her absolute discretion, any claims made against my estate. I further direct that my Personal Representative shall pay out of my estate any and all estate and inheritance taxes payable by reason of my death in respect of all items included in the computation of such taxes, whether passing under this Will or otherwise. Said taxes shall be paid by my Personal Representative as if such taxes were my debts without recovery of any part of such tax payments from anyone who receives any item included in such computation. II. PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE I nominate and appoint ________________________, of ___________________________, County of ________________________, State of ______________________________ as Personal Representative of my estate and I request that (he/she) be appointed temporary Personal Representative if (he/she) applies. If my Personal Representative fails or ceases to so serve, then I nominate _____________________________of __________________________, County of ____________________________, State of ______________________ to serve.
    [Show full text]
  • The New York Probate Process
    THE NEW YORK PROBATE PROCESS – PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE BASICS “In Part I of this series we will discuss how a Personal Representative is appointed and take a broad look at what the position entails. In Part II, we will look as the steps you should take after being appointed the PR of an estate.” SAUL KOBRICK & ANTHONY MOCCIA NEW YORK ESTATE PLANNING ATTORNEYS SERVING NASSAU COUNTY, SUFFOLK COUNTY, AND WESTCHESTER COUNTY The death of a family member or loved one typically ushers in a period of heightened emotions and uncertainty for those impacted by the death. Regardless of how far in advance you are notified that death was inevitable, “preparing” to lose someone close to you is simply not really possible. As a result, a good deal of confusion also tends to follow a death. Adding to that confusion is the knowledge that someone must handle the legal ramifications of the decedent’s death. If a Last Will and Testament was executed by the decedent prior to death the individual appointed as Executor in the Will shall be responsible for overseeing the probate of the estate left behind by the decedent. If the decedent died intestate or without leaving behind a valid Will, the probate court will need to appoint someone to be the Personal Representative of the estate. The New York Probate Process – Personal Representative Basics www.kobricklaw.com 2 If you are appointed to be the Personal Representative, or PR, of the estate the first thing you should do is retain the services of an experienced New York estate planning attorney to provide you with advice and guidance throughout the probate process.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Representative for a Deceased Victim  Victim’S Death Certificate: an Original Or Certified Copy Is Required
    Documents Required When Claimant is not the Victim Documents Required by the VCF when the Claimant is not the Victim Only those authorized by law or court order may pursue a claim on behalf of another individual. In order to process a claim filed by someone other than the victim, the Special Master must first validate the individual’s authority to represent the victim for the VCF claim. Different types of documentation are required depending on the representative’s relationship to the victim. This document provides information on the types of representatives who may file a claim, and the required documents that must be submitted for the VCF to validate the individual as an authorized representative. Personal Representative for a Deceased Victim Victim’s Death Certificate: An original or certified copy is required. If possible, please submit the “long form” version of the death certificate, which lists the cause of death. Letters of Administration, Letters Testamentary, or other Court Order showing the appointment as the Personal Representative, Executor of Will, or Administrator of the Estate. A copy is sufficient for the VCF to validate the Personal Representative. An original or certified copy is required before payment can be issued. o Your court order may include limitations. Some limitations do not interfere with the VCF’s ability to validate the Personal Representative, while other limitations may impact the VCF’s ability to process the claim. See the Instructions for Letters of Administration with Limitations on the VCF website for more detailed information. o If you submit Letters of Administration, Letters Testamentary, or other Court Order that includes limitations that interfere with the VCF’s ability to process or pay your claim, you will be advised in writing and given time to obtain the appropriate documentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Filing for the Administration of a Decedent’S Estate (Adm) in the District of Columbia (Valued at More Than $40,000)
    FILING FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF A DECEDENT’S ESTATE (ADM) IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (VALUED AT MORE THAN $40,000) Office of the Register of Wills, Probate Division 515 5th Street, NW, Third Floor Washington, DC 20001 All attached forms and documents are available through the division’s website: http://www.dccourts.gov/dccourts/superior/probate/index.jsp May 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS General Information Forms Required to File an Estate a. Certificate of Filing Will b. Petition for Probate c. Abbreviated Probate Order d. Personal Identification Form (Form 26) e. Notice of Appointment, Notice to Creditors and Notice to Unknown Heirs f. Bond of Personal Representative Pursuant to D.C. Code, Section 20-502(a) g. Waiver of Personal Representative’s Bond h. Renunciation i. Consent to Appointment of Personal Representative Forms Required Shortly After Appointment a. General Information for Heirs, Legatees and Creditors b. Verification and Certificate of Notice General Information for Large Estates If a person died who lived in the District of Columbia, a large estate can be opened in the Probate Division of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia when the decedent owned real estate in the District of Columbia or other assets of any value or a lawsuit involving the decedent is open or needs to be opened. The assets must have been owned in just the decedent’s name; they must not have joint owners or designated beneficiaries. The forms that will be needed are located on the Probate Division website at http://www.dccourts.gov/internet/public/aud_probate/large.jsf.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Estate Planning Seminar
    WHO IS THE FIDUCIARY?1 © 2014 Anthony L. Barney, Ltd. All Rights Reserved. A. PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES, TRUSTEES, AND TRUST OFFICERS: POWERS AND DUTIES 1. Duties of a Personal Representative A personal representative is appointed by the court to care for the estate of the deceased. An individual can name a personal representative through a testamentary instrument; however, the personal representative has no powers prior to being appointed by the court.2 The statutory fiduciary duties of a personal representative include: (a) the duty to take possession of the estate and collect debts;3 (b) the duty to use reasonable diligence;4 (c) the duty to close the estate within eighteen (18) months;5 and (d) the duty to submit periodic accountings to the court.6 Additionally, a personal representative owes a general duty to the beneficiaries of the estate and the court may order the personal representative to perform other specific duties.7 The personal representative must be diligent in administering the estate. In some cases this may include pursuing an action against one or more of the beneficiaries. It is important that the personal representative understand what is expected in their role. The personal representative should also be aware of potential issues that will affect the distribution of the estate. For example, transfers are void if made as the product of duress or undue influence.8 There are a few situations where the transfer itself is sufficient to presume that it was the product of duress or undue influence. These situations include transfers to a caregiver or a person who paid for the transfer instrument.9 Absent a presumption, undue influence is shown when it appears that the influence destroyed the will of the testator.10 As part of the duty to use reasonable diligence the personal representative should be aware of the presumptions of undue influence and should, were applicable, be aware of the circumstances that give rise to such a claim.
    [Show full text]
  • 3-808. Individual Liability of Personal Representative
    MRS Title 18-C, §3-808. INDIVIDUAL LIABILITY OF PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE §3-808. Individual liability of personal representative 1. Contractual liability. Unless otherwise provided in the contract, a personal representative is not individually liable on a contract properly entered into in a fiduciary capacity in the course of administration of the estate unless the personal representative fails to reveal the representative capacity and identify the estate in the contract. [PL 2017, c. 402, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); PL 2019, c. 417, Pt. B, §14 (AFF).] 2. Liability for ownership or control of property; torts. A personal representative is individually liable for obligations arising from ownership or control of the estate or for torts committed in the course of administration of the estate only if the personal representative is personally at fault. [PL 2017, c. 402, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); PL 2019, c. 417, Pt. B, §14 (AFF).] 3. Proceedings against personal representative in fiduciary capacity. Claims based on contracts entered into by a personal representative in a fiduciary capacity, on obligations arising from ownership or control of the estate or on torts committed in the course of estate administration may be asserted against the estate by proceeding against the personal representative in a fiduciary capacity, whether or not the personal representative is individually liable. [PL 2017, c. 402, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); PL 2019, c. 417, Pt. B, §14 (AFF).] 4. Allocating liability between estate and personal representative. Issues of liability as between the estate and the personal representative individually may be determined in a proceeding for accounting, surcharge or indemnification or other appropriate proceeding.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple-State Estates Under the Uniform Probate Code, 27 Wash
    Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 27 | Issue 1 Article 5 Spring 3-1-1970 Multiple-State Estates Under The niU form Probate Code Allan D. Vestal Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr Part of the Estates and Trusts Commons Recommended Citation Allan D. Vestal, Multiple-State Estates Under The Uniform Probate Code, 27 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 70 (1970), https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol27/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington and Lee Law Review at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington and Lee Law Review by an authorized editor of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 70 WASHINGTON AND LEE LAW REVIEW [Vol. XXVII MULTIPLE-STATE ESTATES UNDER THE UNIFORM PROBATE CODE ALLAN D. VESTAL* I. THE UNIFORM PROBATE CODE On August 7, 1969, the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws adopted by a vote of the states the Uniform Pro- bate Code. The following week the House of Delegates of the American Bar Association approved the Code.' In these actions a giant step forward was taken toward uniformity in probate law in the United States. Although no state has had the opportunity to consider and adopt the Uniform Code, there is reason to believe that a number of states will give serious consideration to the Code in the near future. For some time in the post World War II period various segments of the legal profession and the lay public had been dissatisfied with the methods of passing property from one generation to another.2 This had resulted in a number of probate revisions which have taken place or which have been urged.3 In the decade of the sixties impetus for re- *John F.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Statutes 1975 Supplement
    MINNESOTA STATUTES 1975 SUPPLEMENT UNIFORM PROBATE CODE 524.1-102 CHAPTER 524. UNIFORM PROBATE CODE Sec. Sec. 524.1-102 Purposes; rule of construction. 524.3-401 Formal testacy proceedings; nature; 524.1-105 Repealed. when commenced. 524.1-107 Evidence as to death or status. 524.3-402 Formal testacy or appointment pro­ 524.1-108 Acts by holder of general power. ceedings; petition; contents. 524.1-201 General definitions. 524.3-403 Formal testacy proceeding; notice of 524.1-301 Territorial application. hearing on petition. 524.1-302 Subject matter jurisdiction. 524.3-406 Formal testacy proceedings; con­ 524.1-303 Venue; multiple proceedings; trans­ tested cases; testimony of attesting witnesses. fer. 524.3-409 Formal testacy proceedings; order; 524.1-304 Repealed. foreign will. 524.1-305 Repealed. 524.3-412 Formal testacy proceedings; effect of 524.1-307 Registrar; powers. order; vacation. 524.1-401 Notice; method and time of giving. 524.3-413 Formal testacy proceedings; vacation 524.1-403 Pleadings; when parties bound by of order for other cause and modification of others; notice. orders, judgments, and decrees. 524.2-110 Advancements. [New] 524.3-502 Supervised administration; petition; 524.2-501 Who may make a will. [New] order. 524.2-502 Execution. [New] 524.3-601 Qualification. 524.2-504 Self-proved will. [New] 524.3-602 Acceptance of appointment; consent 524.2-505 Who may witness. [New] to jurisdiction. 524.2-506 Choice of law as to execution. [New] 524.3-603 Bond not required without court or­ 524.2-507 Revocation by writing or by act.
    [Show full text]
  • ADMINISTRATION of INTESTATE ESTATES I. GENERAL Filed In
    ADMINISTRATION OF INTESTATE ESTATES I. GENERAL Filed in Probate Court § 43-2-1 All letters testamentary or of administration, general or special, and the bonds given by executors and administrators must be recorded by the Judge of Probate. II. PETITION FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION A. Place of filing § 43-2-40 1. County where decedent was an inhabitant at the time of death 2. County where non-resident decedent leaves assets 3. County where non-resident decedent’s assets are brought after death 4. Any county in Alabama where the decedent is a resident and leaves assets; if decedent leaves no assets in county of residence, then after 3 months from death B. Priority of Grant of Letters of Administration § 43-2-42 1. Spouse 2. Next of kin 3. Largest creditor 4. County or General Administrator - for those counties with population of 400,000 or more 5. Such person as Probate Judge appoints C. Disqualification of persons to serve as Administrator 1. Under the age of 19 2. Convicted of an infamous crime 3. Incompetent due to intemperance, improvidence or lack of understanding 4. Non-resident of the State of Alabama unless serving as administrator in another state, territory, or jurisdiction D. Time for Administration 1. Letters are not to be granted for 5 days after death § 43-2-45 2. The spouse, next of kin and largest creditor must file for letters within 40 days or they are deemed to waive their priority to administer estate. § 43- 2-43 3. In counties with County or General Administrators, a renunciation by the County or General Administrator may be required to be filed before letters will issue.
    [Show full text]
  • HB 2236 Title: an Act Relating to the Disposition of Certain Assets
    Washington State BILL House of Representatives ANALYSIS Office of Program Research Judiciary Committee HB 2236 Title: An act relating to the disposition of certain assets. Brief Description: Disposing of certain assets. Sponsors: Representatives Goodman and Lantz. Brief Summary of Bill • Adopts the 1991 version of the Uniform Simultaneous Death Act, including a 120 hour rule for determining survivorship under instruments or laws that transfer title to property based on priority of death. • Clarifies various definitions for purposes of probate and trust law, including that a child who was conceived before, but born after, the death of a parent is the surviving issue of the parent. • Makes various changes with respect to nonprobate assets, the use of separate lists of property in connection with revocable trusts, statutes of limitation in will challenges, and the award of attorney's fees in trust and estate disputes. Hearing Date: 2/26/07 Staff: Bill Perry (786-7123). Background: The probate and trust law affects the distribution of property through intestate succession or under various legal instruments such as wills or trusts. Uniform Simultaneous Death Act. The operation of various laws or legal instruments may depend on the order in which two or more people die. If the death of two or more such persons is apparently simultaneous, such as in an automobile accident, the Uniform Simultaneous Death Act (USDA) may apply. The USDA provides generally that if there is not sufficient evidence that the persons died other than This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations.
    [Show full text]