DOCSLIB.ORG

Comparative Karyotype Analysis of Delphinium Malabaricum Var

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

© 2012 The Japan Mendel Society Cytologia 77(1): 113–119 Comparative Karyotype Analysis of Delphinium malabaricum var. malabaricum (Huth) Munz. and Delphinium malabaricum var. ghaticum Billore. Firdose R. Kolar*, Kumar Vinod Chhotupuri Gosavi, Arun Nivrutti Chandore, Shrirang Ramchandra Yadav and Ghansham Balbhima Dixit Department of Botany, Shivaji University, Kolhapur-416004 (M.S.), India Received August 25, 2011; accepted February 1, 2012 Summary Delphinium malabaricum (Huth) Munz. and its variety D. malabaricum var. ghaticum Billore (Ranunculaceae) were cytologically examined. Both taxa were found to possess 2n=16 dip- loid chromosome number. The 8 pairs of homologous chromosomes were characterized into 1 meta- centric, 1 submetacentric and 6 subtelocentric chromosomes. The total length of diploid comple- ments and range of chromosome length were more or less the same in the species and its variety. The length of metaphase chromosomes ranged from 1.42 to 5.35 μm in D. malabaricum var. malabaricum and from 1.77 to 5.30 μm in D. malabaricum var. ghaticum with an average length of 2.88 μm and 2.92 μm, respectively. The total chromosome length (TCL) of the former was 23.05 μm and that of the latter was 23.38 μm. The prevalence of chromosomes with subtelocentric centromeres indicated a tendency towards asymmetric karyotype, which revealed an advanced feature. Hence both the taxa belong to Stebbinsʼs 2B type karyotypic symmetry class. The r esults revealed that D. malabaricum var. malabaricum and D. malabaricum var. ghaticum have a similar karyotype pattern, despite differing morphologically. Thus, it may be concluded that the external morphological varia- tion occurred independently of the chromosomal variation, which may have played a prominent role in the intraspecific differentiation of D. malabaricum. Key words Delphinium malabaricum, Ranunculaceae, Endemic, Karyotype symmetry, Western Ghats, India. The genus Delphinium is one of the most important genera of the family Ranunculaceae, which represents a group of very beautiful annuals, rarely biennials and perennial plants, com- monly called Larkspurs. The diversity of colors and shape of their flowers bestows this genus a very interesting ornamental potential. The genus has about 370 species distributed throughout the north temperate regions of the world (Blanché 1991). According to Rau (1993) Delphinium L. is represented in India by 24 species, almost all confined to Himalayan regions except D. malabaricum, which is an endemic perennial herb restricted to only a few locations in Western Ghats of India and is considered as a rare species (Billore 1973). This is the only species of the genus growing naturally in Western India. It is represented by its 1 species and 1 variety D. malabaricum var. malabaricum (Figs. 1a, 1c) and D. malabaricum var. ghaticum (Figs. 1b, 1d). D. malabaricum var. malabaricum is stated vulnerable and D. malabaricum var. ghaticum as critically endangered due to its small fragmented population and distribution (Mishra and Singh 2001). The existence of previous chromosome counts for the studied species of the genus Delphinium has been checked in the indices of plant chromosome numbers (Mehra and Ramanandan 1972, Langlet 1927, Lewitzky 1931, Lawrence 1936, Gregory 1941, Lewis et al. 1951, Al-Kelidar and Richards 1981, Love 1981, 1984, and Subramanian 1985) and revealed the presence of diploid * Corresponding author, e-mail: fi[email protected] 114 F. Kolar et al. Cytologia 77(1) Fig. 1. Delphinium malabaricum var. malabaricum (Huth) Munz.: a: Infloresence, c: Side view of flower showing spur, e: Meocyte showing haploid chromosome number n=8, g: Somatic chromosome number 2n=16, i: Karyogram and Delphinium malabaricum var. ghaticum Billore.: b: Infloresence, d: Side view of flower showing spur, f: Meocyte showing haploid chromosome number n=8, h: Somatic chromosome number, 2n=16, j: Karyogram. (2n=16), triploid (2n=24), tetraploid (2n=32) and hexaploid (2n=48) levels for the genus (Table 1). The basic chromosome number of the genus is reported to be x=8 (Darlington and Janaki-Ammal 1945). Cytological data is of great importance for systematic and evolutionary studies of plants and have been widely used to elucidate intraspecific and/or interspecific relationships and delimit spe- cific or generic circumscriptions (Stebbins 1971, Raven 1975, Hong 1990). D. malabaricum var. malabaricum has been previously investigated cytologically in which 2n=16 chromosome number was reported (Pai et al. 2007). However, D. malabaricum var. ghaticum has not been explored cy- tologically. The present study is intended to re-examine the chromosome numbers and karyomor- 2012 Karyotype Comparison in 2 Varieties of Delphinium malabaricum (Huth) Munz. 115 Table 1. Previous reports of somatic chromosome number in Delphinium species Chromosome number Taxa Author and year n 2n D. ajacis L. 8 16 Langlet 1927, Gregory 1941 D. andersoni Gray 8 16 Lewis et al. 1951 D. altissimum Wallich. 8 16 Mehra and Kaur 1963 D. belladonna (hort) 16, 24 24, 48 Langlet 1927, Subramanian 1985 D. brunonianum Royle. 8, 16 16, 32 Lewitzky 1931, Al-Kelidar and Richards 1981 D. californicum T. & G. 8 16 Lewis et al. 1951 D. candelabrum Ostenf. var. monanthum 8 16 Yang and Wu 1993 D. cardeopetallum DC. 8 16 Lewitzky 1931 D. cardinale Hook. 8 16 Mehlquist et al. 1943 D. carolinianum Walt 16 32 Gregory 1941 D. cashmerianum Royle. 8, 16 16, 32 Love 1981, Al-Kelidar and Richards 1981 D. decorum Fisch. & Mey. ssp. tracyi Ewan 8 16 Lewis et al. 1951 D. denudatum Wallich. 8, 10, 16 16, 20, 32 Me hra and Ramanandan 1972, Sarkar et al. 1982, Al-Kelidar and Richards 1981 D. elatum L. 16 32 Lawrence 1936 D. formosum Boiss. & Huet 16 32 Gregory 1941 D. glaucum Wats. 8 16 Lewis et al. 1951 D. grandiflorum L. 8 16 Propach 1940 D. gypsophilum Ewan 8, 16 16, 32 Lewis et al. 1951 D. glaucum Wats. 8 16 Lewis et al. 1951 D. gracilentum Greene 8 16 Lewis et al. 1951 D. hanseni Greene 8, 16 16, 32 Lewis et al. 1951 D. hesperium Gray 8 16 Lewis et al. 1951 D. hesperium var. cuyamacae (Abrams) Jeps. 8 16 Le wis et al. 1951 D. malabaricum var. malabaricum (Huth) Munz. 8 16 Pai et al. 2007, present communication. D. malabaricum var. ghaticum Billore 8 16 present communication. D. nudicaule T. & G. 8 16 Gregory 1941 D. scabriflorum D. 8 16 Love 1984 D. variegatum T. & G. 8, 16 16, 32 Lewis et al. 1951 D. vestitum Wallich. 8 16 Mehra and Kaur 1963 phology of D. malabaricum var. malabaricum and compare it with the respective karyomorphology of D. malabaricum var. ghaticum, seeking chromosomal characters potentially important for under- standing the taxonomy of these varieties. Materials and methods In order to study the karyotypic characteristics, seeds of D. malabaricum var. malabaricum (Huth) Munz and D. malabaricum var. ghaticum Billore were collected from the localities Ajinkyatara in the Satara district and Harhargadh in the Nasik district of Maharashtra, respectively. The seeds were germinated on sterile moist filter paper in petri dishes at 25°C. The root tips were excised and pretreated with aqueous saturated solution of para-dichlorobenzene (pDB) for 4 h at 8–10°C. Then they were hydrolyzed with 1N HCl at 60°C and stained with 2% aceto-orcein. Slides were observed using a Carl Zeiss microscope and were randomly photographed (Nikon Coolpix 4500 digital camera) to obtain 10 appropriate metaphase plates. The plates were used for the analy- sis of chromosome complements. The lengths of long and short arms were measured and these measurements were used for further calculations of arm ratio, centromeric index and percentage of relative chromosomal length (RL%). The chromosomes were classified according to their arm ra- tios into metacentric, submetacentric and subtelocentric (Levan et al. 1964). For the estimation of 116 F. Kolar et al. Cytologia 77(1) karyotype asymmetry, 3 numerical parameters, namely intrachromosomal asymmetry index (A1), interchromosomal asymmetry index (A2) and asymmetry index (AI), were used (Romero Zarco, 1986 and Paszko, 2006). To analyze the variability of the karyotypes among these 2 taxa, the asym- metry index, mean RL% of haploid chromosomes and mean arm ratio were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Graphpad instat software. Chromosome pairing was also studied in pollen mother cells (PMCs) of D. malabaricum. Anthers were fixed in Carnoyʼs fluid, and after hydrolysis were stained with 2% aceto-orcein. The slides were examined under a Carl Zeiss microscope and Chromosome pairing was determined from cells at diakinesis or metaphase I. Results The present study demonstrated that D. malabaricum var. malabaricum and D. malabaricum var. ghaticum were diploids 2n=16 chromosome complement (Fig. 1g, 1h). The individual chromo- some length ranged from 1.42 μm to 5.35 μm in D. malabaricum var. malabaricum and from Table 2. Karyological features of Delphinium malabaricum var. malabaricum Chromosome Long arm Short arm Total length ʻdʼ value ʻrʼ value ʻiʼ value Relative Centromeric Type pair L (μm) S (μm) C=L+S (μm) L–S (μm) L/S (μm) S/CX100 length (%) position I 3.17∓0.21 2.18∓0.39 5.35∓0.57 0.99 1.45 40.75 23.24 m A II 2.93∓0.34 1.58∓0.21 4.52∓0.36 1.34 1.85 35.08 19.61 sm B III 2.26∓0.07 0.43∓0.93 2.69∓0.07 1.82 5.18 16.17 11.70 st C IV 1.98∓0.07 0.47∓0.07 2.46∓0.13 1.50 4.16 19.35 10.67 st C V 1.90∓1.57 0.39∓0.12 2.30∓0.15 1.50 4.80 17.24 09.98 st C VI 1.82∓0.07 0.39∓0.07 2.22∓0.13 1.42 4.60 17.85 09.63 st C VII 1.82∓0.07 0.23∓1.96 2.06∓0.23 1.58 7.66 11.53 08.94 st D VIII 1.19∓0.00 0.23∓1.43 1.42∓0.15 0.95 5.00 16.66 06.19 st E Trait TCL A1 A2 AI TF% L/S 23.05 0.69 0.46 20.96 25.82 3.76 TCL: Total haploid chromosome length, A1: intrachromosomal asymmetry index, A2: interchromosomal asymmetry index, AI: Asymmetry index, TF%: Total form percent, L/S: Longest chromosome/Shortest chromosome.
Recommended publications
  • Sunol Wildflower Guide

    Sunol Wildflower Guide

    Sunol Wildflowers A photographic guide to showy wildflowers of Sunol Regional Wilderness Sorted by Flower Color Photographs by Wilde Legard Botanist, East Bay Regional Park District Revision: February 23, 2007 More than 2,000 species of native and naturalized plants grow wild in the San Francisco Bay Area. Most are very difficult to identify without the help of good illustrations. This is designed to be a simple, color photo guide to help you identify some of these plants. The selection of showy wildflowers displayed in this guide is by no means complete. The intent is to expand the quality and quantity of photos over time. The revision date is shown on the cover and on the header of each photo page. A comprehensive plant list for this area (including the many species not found in this publication) can be downloaded at the East Bay Regional Park District’s wild plant download page at: http://www.ebparks.org. This guide is published electronically in Adobe Acrobat® format to accommodate these planned updates. You have permission to freely download and distribute, and print this pdf for individual use. You are not allowed to sell the electronic or printed versions. In this version of the guide, only showy wildflowers are included. These wildflowers are sorted first by flower color, then by plant family (similar flower types), and finally by scientific name within each family. Under each photograph are four lines of information, based on the current standard wild plant reference for California: The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California, 1993. Common Name These non-standard names are based on Jepson and other local references.
  • Gymnaconitum, a New Genus of Ranunculaceae Endemic to the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau

    Gymnaconitum, a New Genus of Ranunculaceae Endemic to the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau

    TAXON 62 (4) • August 2013: 713–722 Wang & al. • Gymnaconitum, a new genus of Ranunculaceae Gymnaconitum, a new genus of Ranunculaceae endemic to the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Wei Wang,1 Yang Liu,2 Sheng-Xiang Yu,1 Tian-Gang Gao1 & Zhi-Duan Chen1 1 State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, P.R. China 2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-3043, U.S.A. Author for correspondence: Wei Wang, [email protected] Abstract The monophyly of traditional Aconitum remains unresolved, owing to the controversial systematic position and taxonomic treatment of the monotypic, Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau endemic A. subg. Gymnaconitum. In this study, we analyzed two datasets using maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference methods: (1) two markers (ITS, trnL-F) of 285 Delphinieae species, and (2) six markers (ITS, trnL-F, trnH-psbA, trnK-matK, trnS-trnG, rbcL) of 32 Delphinieae species. All our analyses show that traditional Aconitum is not monophyletic and that subgenus Gymnaconitum and a broadly defined Delphinium form a clade. The SOWH tests also reject the inclusion of subgenus Gymnaconitum in traditional Aconitum. Subgenus Gymnaconitum markedly differs from other species of Aconitum and other genera of tribe Delphinieae in many non-molecular characters. By integrating lines of evidence from molecular phylogeny, divergence times, morphology, and karyology, we raise the mono- typic A. subg. Gymnaconitum to generic status. Keywords Aconitum; Delphinieae; Gymnaconitum; monophyly; phylogeny; Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau; Ranunculaceae; SOWH test Supplementary Material The Electronic Supplement (Figs. S1–S8; Appendices S1, S2) and the alignment files are available in the Supplementary Data section of the online version of this article (http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/iapt/tax).
  • Species Status Assessment Report for the San Clemente Island Larkspur (Delphinium Variegatum Ssp

    Species Status Assessment Report for the San Clemente Island Larkspur (Delphinium Variegatum Ssp

    Species Status Assessment Report for the San Clemente Island larkspur (Delphinium variegatum ssp. kinkiense) Version 1.0 Image courtesy of US Navy March 2020 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Southwest Region Sacramento, CA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document was prepared by the Texas A&M Natural Resources Institute in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the United States Navy as part of the Service’s San Clemente Island Species Status Assessment Team. We would like to recognize and thank the following individuals who provided substantive information and/or insights for our SSA: Sula Vanderplank, Dawn Lawson, Jon Rebman, Kim O’Connor, Bryan Munson, and Melissa Booker. Additionally, valuable input into the analysis and reviews of a draft of this document were provided by Mitchell McGlaughlin and Andrea Williams. We appreciate their input and comments, which resulted in a more robust status assessment and final report. Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2020. Species status assessment report for the San Clemente Island larkspur (Delphinium variegatum ssp. kinkiense), Version 1.0. March 2020. Sacramento, CA. SSA Report – San Clemente Island larkspur ii March 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Species Status Assessment (SSA) provides an analysis of the overall species viability for the San Clemente Island larkspur (Delphinium variegatum ssp. kinkiense). To assess the viability of this subspecies, we, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, used the conservation biology principles of resiliency, redundancy, and representation (3 Rs). Specifically, we identified the subspecies’ ecological requirements and resources needed for individual survival and reproduction. We described the stressors (threats) influencing these resources and evaluated current levels of population resiliency and subspecies redundancy and representation using available metrics to forecast the ability of this subspecies to sustain populations into the future.
  • Genetic Diversity in Delphinium Variegatum (Ranunculaceae): a Comparison of Two Insular Endemic Subspecies and Their Widespread Mainland Relative1

    Genetic Diversity in Delphinium Variegatum (Ranunculaceae): a Comparison of Two Insular Endemic Subspecies and Their Widespread Mainland Relative1

    American Journal of Botany 89(4): 613–622. 2002. GENETIC DIVERSITY IN DELPHINIUM VARIEGATUM (RANUNCULACEAE): A COMPARISON OF TWO INSULAR ENDEMIC SUBSPECIES AND THEIR WIDESPREAD MAINLAND RELATIVE1 SHANA C. DODD2,4 AND KAIUS HELENURM3,5 2Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92182 USA; and 3Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota 57069 USA Delphinium variegatum is subdivided into three subspecies: D. v. variegatum is widespread in central and northern California, while D. v. kinkiense (an endangered taxon) and D. v. thornei are endemic to San Clemente Island off the coast of southern California. Electrophoretic data for 19 loci were collected from 7 populations of the mainland subspecies and all 24 known populations of the two insular endemic subspecies. Populations of the widespread mainland subspecies have more polymorphic loci (33.6% vs. 24.5%) and more alleles per polymorphic locus (2.61 vs. 2.15) than the insular endemic subspecies. However, observed heterozygosities are lower in the mainland subspecies (0.041 vs. 0.071), presumably due to lower levels of outcrossing (t ϭ 0.464 vs. 0.895). Expected heterozygosities are similar (0.064 vs. 0.074) due to lower alternative allele frequencies in populations of the mainland subspecies (mean q ϭ 0.075 vs. 0.190). Populations of the two insular subspecies are almost equivalent genetically (mean I ϭ 0.997) regardless of taxonomic designation or geographic location. In contrast, one of the mainland populations is genetically well differentiated from the others. If this exceptional population is excluded, the mainland subspecies partitions genetic diversity similarly to the island subspecies, with most variation being found within populations (GST ϭ 0.073 vs.
  • Thomas Coulter's Californian Exsiccata

    Thomas Coulter's Californian Exsiccata

    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 37 Issue 1 Issue 1–2 Article 2 2019 Plantae Coulterianae: Thomas Coulter’s Californian Exsiccata Gary D. Wallace California Botanic Garden, Claremont, CA Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Wallace, Gary D. (2020) "Plantae Coulterianae: Thomas Coulter’s Californian Exsiccata," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 37: Iss. 1, Article 2. Available at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol37/iss1/2 Aliso, 37(1–2), pp. 1–73 ISSN: 0065-6275 (print), 2327-2929 (online) PLANTAE COULTERIANAE: THOMAS COULTER’S CALIFORNIAN EXSICCATA Gary D. Wallace California Botanic Garden [formerly Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden], 1500 North College Avenue, Claremont, California 91711 ([email protected]) abstract An account of the extent, diversity, and importance of the Californian collections of Thomas Coulter in the herbarium (TCD) of Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland, is presented here. It is based on examination of collections in TCD, several other collections available online, and referenced literature. Additional infor- mation on historical context, content of herbarium labels and annotations is included. Coulter’s collections in TCD are less well known than partial duplicate sets at other herbaria. He was the first botanist to cross the desert of southern California to the Colorado River. Coulter’s collections in TCD include not only 60 vascular plant specimens previously unidentified as type material but also among the first moss andmarine algae specimens known to be collected in California. A list of taxa named for Thomas Coulter is included.
  • Walker Ridge and Bear Valley Area, Lake and Colusa Counties

    Walker Ridge and Bear Valley Area, Lake and Colusa Counties

    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 2018 Checklist of the Vascular Plants of the Walker Ridge and Bear Valley Area, Lake and Colusa Counties James P. Smith Jr. Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr., "Checklist of the Vascular Plants of the Walker Ridge and Bear Valley Area, Lake and Colusa Counties" (2018). Botanical Studies. 76. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/76 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE WALKER RIDGE - BEAR VALLEY AREA (LAKE AND COLUSA COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA) Compiled by James P. Smith, Jr. & John O. Sawyer, Jr. Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Tenth Edition: 01 July 2018 Chlorogalum pomeridianum var. pomeridianum • soaproot F E R N S Dichelostemma multiflorum • wild-hyacinth Dichelostemma volubile • snake-lily, twining brodiaea Dipterostemon capitatum ssp. capitatum • blue dicks Aspidotis densa • Indian's dream Hastingsia alba • white-flowered schoenolirion Equisetum arvense • field horsetail Triteleia hyacinthina • white brodiaea Equisetum laevigatum • smooth scouring-rush Triteleia laxa • Ithuriel's spear Pellaea andromedifolia var. pubescens • coffee fern Triteleia peduncularis • long-rayed triteleia Pellaea mucronata var.
  • Checklist of Vascular Plant Species Occurring Within the BCCER

    Checklist of Vascular Plant Species Occurring Within the BCCER

    Checklist of Vascular Plant Species Occurring Within the BCCER This checklist is under cont inual revision. Please send correct ions or addit ions t o: jmot t @csuchico.edu A "+" indicates non-native species SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Abies concolor White fir Acer macrophyllum Big-leaved maple Achnatherum lemmonii Lemmon's needlegrass Achyrachaena mollis Blow wives Adiantum capillus-veneris Southern maidenhair Adiantum jordanii California maidenhair Aegilops triuncialis + Barbed goatgrass Aesculus californica California buckeye Agoseris heterophylla Annual agoseris Agoseris retrorsa Spear-leafed agoseris Agrostis exarata Spiked bentgrass Aira caryophyllea + Silver European hairgrass Alisma plantago-aquatica Water-plantain Allium amplectens Clasping onion Allium cratericola Volcanic onion Allium membranaceum Papery onion Allium peninsulare var. peninsulare Mexican onion Allium sanbornii var sanbornii Sanborn's onion Alnus rhombifolia White alder Alopecurus pratensis + Meadow foxtail Amsinkia menziesii var. intermedia Common fiddleneck Amsinkia menziesii var. menziesii Menzie's fiddleneck Anagallis arvensis + Scarlet pimpernell Andropogon glomeratus var. scabriglumis Southwestern bushy bluestem Angelica californica California angelica Anthemis cotula + Mayweed Anthriscus caucalis + Bur-chervil Antirrhinum cornutum Spurred snapdragon Antirrhinum vexillo-calyculatum ssp intermedium Wiry Snapdragon Aphanes occidentalis Western lady's mantle Apocynum cannabinum Indian-hemp Aquilegia formosa var. truncata Crimson columbine Arabis breweri var.
  • Grey Pine Checklist-07Jun19

    Grey Pine Checklist-07Jun19

    Checklist1 of Vascular Flora of Grey Pine Trail, Santa Margarita Lake San Luis Obispo County, California (07 June 2019) David J. Keil Robert F. Hoover Herbarium Biological Sciences Department California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, California Scientific Name Common Name Family Rare n ❀ Acmispon americanus var. americanus Spanish-clover FABACEAE o n ❀ Acmispon glaber var. glaber common deerweed FABACEAE o n Acmispon parviflorus miniature deervetch FABACEAE o n ❀ Acourtia microcephala sacapelote ASTERACEAE o n Adiantum Jordanii California maidenhair fern PTERIDACEAE o n Agastache urticifolia nettle-leaved horsemint LAMIACEAE o n ❀ Agoseris grandiflora var. grandiflora large-flowered mountain- ASTERACEAE o dandelion n Amorpha californica var. californica false indigo-bush FABACEAE o n Amsinckia intermedia common fiddleneck BORAGINACEAE v 1 Please notify the author of additions or corrections to this list ([email protected]). ❀ — See Wildflowers of San Luis Obispo, California, second edition (2018) for photograph. Most are illustrated in the first edition as well; old names for some species in square brackets. n — California native i — exotic species, introduced to California, naturalized or waif. v — documented by one or more specimens (Consortium of California Herbaria record; specimen in OBI; or collection that has not yet been accessioned) o — observed during field surveys; no voucher specimen known Rare—California Rare Plant Rank Scientific Name Common Name Family Rare n Aphanes occidentalis western parsley-piert ROSACEAE
  • •Jepson Man Plnt List

    •Jepson Man Plnt List

    PLANT HABITATS & VEGETATION PLANTS FERNS & FERN ALLIES Azollaceae - Mosquito Fern Family Azolla filiculoides mosquito fern marshes Equisetaceae - Horsetail Family Equisetum hyemale ssp. affine rough horsetail marshes Isoetaceae - Quillwort Family Isoetes orcuttii Orcutt’s quillwort pools Marsileaceae - Marsilea Family Marsilea vestita ssp. v. water shamrock marshes Pilularia americana American pill-wort pools DICOTS Aizoaceae - Iceplant Family Sesuvium verrucosum western sea-purslane near marsh Amaranthaceae - Pigweed Family Amaranthus albus* tumbleweed amaranthus disturbed Amaranthus blitoides prostrate amaranthus disturbed Apiaceae - Carrot Family Anthriscus caucalis?* bur-chervil grassland Cicuta maculata var. bolanderi water hemlock marshes Eryngium aristulatum var. a. aristulate coyote-thistle playas Eryngium articulatum purple button-celery marshes Eryngium vaseyi Vasey’s coyote-thistle pools Foeniculum vulgare* fennel disturbed Hydrocotyle verticillata whorled marsh-pennywort intertidal Lilaeopsis masonii R (C2/CR/1b) Mason’s lilaeopsis intertidal Lomatium caruifolium var. denticulatum caraway-leaved lomatium grassland Lomatium utriculatum common lomatium grassland Oenanthe sarmentosa water-parsley marshes Sanicula bipinnatifida purple sanicle, snake-root grassland Torilis arvensis* common hedge-parsley disturbed Torilis nodosa* knotted hedge-parsley disturbed Apocynaceae - Dogbane Family Apocynum cannabinum Indian hemp near marsh Asclepiadaceae - Milkweed Family Asclepias fascicularis narrow-leaved milkweed near marsh Asteraceae

  • Special-Status Plants Study Report Don Pedro Project Ferc No

    SPECIAL-STATUS PLANTS STUDY REPORT DON PEDRO PROJECT FERC NO. 2299 Prepared for: Turlock Irrigation District – Turlock, California Modesto Irrigation District – Modesto, California Prepared by: HDR Engineering, Inc. December 2013 Special-Status Plants Study Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Section No. Description Page No. 1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Relicensing Process ............................................................................................. 1-3 1.3 Study Plan ............................................................................................................ 1-4 2.0 STUDY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES .......................................................................... 2-1 3.0 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................................ 3-1 4.0 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................ 4-1 4.1 Gather Data and Prepare for Field Effort ............................................................. 4-1 4.2 Botanical Surveys ................................................................................................ 4-5 4.3 Consultation with Project O&M Staff ................................................................. 4-6 5.0 RESULTS ......................................................................................................................

  • Del Valle Plants

    Del Valle Plants A photographic guide to wild plants of Del Valle Regional Park Sorted by Scientific Name Photographs by Wilde Legard Botanist, East Bay Regional Park District Revision: February 23, 2007 More than 2,000 species of native and naturalized plants grow wild in the San Francisco Bay Area. Most are very difficult to identify without the help of good illustrations. This is designed to be a simple, color photo guide to help you identify some of these plants. The selection of plants displayed in this guide is by no means complete. The intent is to expand the quality and quantity of photos over time. The revision date is shown on the cover and on the header of each photo page. A comprehensive plant list for this area (including the many species not found in this publication) can be downloaded at the East Bay Regional Park District’s wild plant download page at: http://www.ebparks.org. This guide is published electronically in Adobe Acrobat® format to accommodate these planned updates. You have permission to freely download, distribute, and print this pdf for individual use. You are not allowed to sell the electronic or printed versions. In this version of the guide, the included plants are sorted alphabetically by scientific name. Under each photograph are four lines of information, based on upon the current standard wild plant reference for California: The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California, 1993. Scientific Name Scientific names revised since 1993 are NOT included in this edition. Common Name These non-standard names are based on Jepson and other local references.
  • Comparative Serology of the Order Nymphaeales. II. Relationships of Nymphaeaceae and Nelumbonaceae Jean-Pierre Simon Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden

    Comparative Serology of the Order Nymphaeales. II. Relationships of Nymphaeaceae and Nelumbonaceae Jean-Pierre Simon Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden

    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 7 | Issue 3 Article 5 1971 Comparative Serology of the Order Nymphaeales. II. Relationships of Nymphaeaceae and Nelumbonaceae Jean-Pierre Simon Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Simon, Jean-Pierre (1971) "Comparative Serology of the Order Nymphaeales. II. Relationships of Nymphaeaceae and Nelumbonaceae," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 7: Iss. 3, Article 5. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol7/iss3/5 ALISO VoL. 7, No. 3, pp. 325-350 APRIL 22, 1971 COMPARATIVE SEROLOGY OF THE ORDER NYMPHAEALES II. RELATIONSHIPS OF NYMPHAEACEAE AND NELUMBONACEAE. JEAN-PIERRE SIMON Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden Claremont, California 91711 INTRODUCTION In a continuing effort to elucidate the serological reiationships of taxa of the aquatic order Nymphaeales, I am reporting here additiona,l data ob­ ta,ined from cross-reactions with antiser-a produced against species of Nu­ phar, Nymphaea, Victoria and Euryale. An earlier study established that Nelumbo wias serologically isolated from the remaining species of the Order ( Simon, 1970). In addition, the data showed that N elumbo had serological affinities with members of the Magnolia.Jes, Ranuncu1ales and Papaverales which were of the same magnitude to those found between N elumbo and the remaining taxa of the Nymphaeales. MATERIALS AND METHODS Extracts of representative species of Nymphaeales, Magnoliales, Ranun­ cu1ales and other orders of Angiosperms, as listed in Tables 2 and 3 of Simon ( 1970), were inves•tigated. Seeds of additional species of these and other orders of Angiosperms have since been available for this study ( Table 3 and text).