DOCSLIB.ORG

Kotel Conflict 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kotel Conflict 2021 Kotel Conflict 2021 19 July, 2021 On Tisha B’Av 2021, the day in the Jewish calendar that commemorates the destruction of both Temples in Jerusalem, a group of Orthodox protestors disrupted prayer services being conducted by non-Orthodox worshippers at the site dedicated for egalitarian prayer at the Western Wall (the Kotel) – Judaism’s holiest site. During the disturbances, Orthodox protestors attempted to create a forced separation between male and female worshippers, while yelling, cursing and interrupting the egalitarian prayer service. The protestors were widely criticized by Israel’s leaders, including President Isaac Herzog, Foreign Minister Yair Lapid and Diaspora Affairs Minister Nahman Shai. Background The Kotel has been a site for Jewish prayer for hundreds of years, and is considered the holiest site in Judaism, after the Temple Mount itself. Traditionally, worshippers who frequented the site followed Orthodox rites, but no permanent separation between men and women was established until after 1967, when the Kotel came under Israeli sovereignty following the Six Day War. The Western Wall Heritage Foundation, controlled by Orthodox bodies and today led by an Orthodox rabbi, was granted control over the entire Kotel precinct, and has jurisdiction to create rules and establish infrastructure in the area. Over the years, the Foundation has ensured that only Orthodox prayer services are permitted in the area, and has created many rules to enforce that goal. These rules include bans on women wearing a tallit or tfillin, women carrying a Torah Scroll, women using a microphone, and holding either mixed (or women-only) organized prayer services. The Foundation, and many Orthodox Jews, have argued that these rules maintain the traditions and customs of the site, and serve the vast majority of worshippers at the Kotel, including hundreds who pray there every day, who are almost exclusively Orthodox. Opposing the Orthodox Monopoly However, as non-Orthodox streams of Judaism began to grow in Israel, many became frustrated by the monopoly that Orthodox groups held at the site. Similarly, non-Orthodox Jews from around the world were left feeling out of place when they visited Israel and the Kotel, and were essentially banned from practicing their own form of Judaism, at their holiest site. Many were astounded to understand that they were restricted from practicing Judaism as they wanted to, in, of all places, the Jewish state. In 1988 a multi-denominational group known as the Women of the Wall began holding regular egalitarian services at the Kotel, often in defiance of the rules governing the area. Over many years, a series of Supreme Court decisions, government enquiries, and attempts at Knesset legislation have gone back and forth, at times expanding the rights of non-Orthodox prayer, and at other times further restricting it. For many years, Women of the Wall have held large egalitarian services at the Kotel each Rosh Chodesh (marking the new Jewish month). These services have often resulted in scuffles with Orthodox protestors, as well as arrests on both sides. 1 Robinson’s Arch In a 2003 decision, the Supreme Court proposed the establishment of an area dedicated to non-Orthodox prayer at an area known as Robinson’s Arch. Robinson’s Arch’s is historically and religiously part of the Kotel, but is cut off from the main Western Wall plaza by a large bridge used by those ascending to the Temple Mount. The area was also difficult to access and served mainly as an archeological site. There was no infrastructure for prayer services. In addition, the entrance to the area is not located in the main Kotel area, and the site does not have the “feel” of being part of the Kotel. “Ezrat Yisrael” As pressure from global Jewry increased to find a fair solution, in 2012, then Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu tasked then-Jewish Agency Chair Natan Sharansky to convene discussions with all parties to find a compromise on the issue. Sharansky indicated early on that he saw the best solution as building a permanent structure at Robinson’s Arch that would satisfy all sides. While discussions continued, then-Jerusalem Affairs Minister Naftali Bennett ordered a prayer platform be built at Robinson’s Arch to provide some immediate relief. The new, small platform, known as Ezrat Yisrael, would be dedicated to non-Orthodox prayer service, and is currently administered by the Conservative (Masorti) Movement in Israel. The platform provides considerably greater accessibility to the site, but leaves numerous challenges in place. Disabled access to the platform is problematic, and the entrance to the area is not within the traditional Kotel Plaza, meaning that Ezrat Yisrael still feels “disconnected” from the rest of the Kotel. The Kotel Compromise Sharansky led a process of intense negotiations on a compromise deal, where The Jewish Federations of North America played a leading role. JFNA representatives formed part of the team tackling the problem, and often served as a bridge between different parties who did not always communicate directly. Taking part (sometimes indirectly) in the negotiations alongside JFNA and the Reform and Conservative movements in Israel, were the Israeli government, the Jewish Agency for Israel, Women of the Wall, Israeli political parties, and the (ultra-Orthodox) Chief Rabbi of the Western Wall. At the end of the process, a deal emerged that would see the Robinson’s Arch area turned into a permanent structure for non-Orthodox prayer whose entrance would be located after the security barrier for the main Kotel plaza. The area would be administered by a board chaired by the Jewish Agency and also comprising of the non- Orthodox streams. In a historic move, all sides agreed to the compromise, which was adopted as a government resolution in 2016. (Fuller details of the agreement can be seen in this article as well as here). However, following an outcry over the deal in the ultra-Orthodox media, haredi politicians back-tracked their support for the deal, and convinced the government to freeze its implementation. It has been reported in the media that the new government, sworn in during July 2021, is committed to unfreezing and implementing the deal, and a number of ministers have publicly backed doing so. See here for further details. While political machinations have continued since 2017, the Ezrat Yisrael platform continues to operate as a site – if somewhat imperfect – for non-Orthodox prayer services. During 2020-21, with significantly fewer visitors to Israel from abroad due to the COVID pandemic, the platform has seen less use than normal, and a number of Orthodox groups have begun praying at the site, and in doing so, have attempted to establish an Orthodox presence there. 2 Tisha B’Av 2021 On Saturday night, July 17, 2021, a non-Orthodox group of worshipers came to Ezrat Yisrael for a prayer service to mark Tisha B’Av, the saddest day in the Jewish calendar. Shortly after prayers began, a large group from an organization calling itself the Joint Committee for Preserving the Holiness of the Western Wall entered the area and began to set up a “mechitza” (a physical separation between men and women). Members of the group, mainly teenagers, also began to yell and hurl insults at the non-Orthodox group, severely interrupting their prayer service. Following the incident, President Isaac Herzog said that he was very saddened to see what had occurred at the plaza. “There is no reason to interrupt prayers at that plaza,” he said. Foreign Minister Yair Lapid said, “On the day we commemorate the destruction of the Temple, a group of extremists decided to desecrate the holiness of the day and the holiness of the place and start a violent struggle at the Kotel. That’s the baseless hatred that led to the destruction of the Temple and our exile.” See more on the incident here and here. The Modern Orthodox Rabbi Yuval Cherlow, a prominent spiritual leader of the Israeli “National Religious” movement has changed his position on the Kotel Compromise as a result of recent unrest at the site. Rabbi Cherlow was originally opposed to the Compromise, but following the events of Tisha B’Av has said that for the sake of unity, he now believes it is the best way forward. Diaspora Affairs Minister Nachman Shai said that it was wrong to increase “wickedness and hatred” on Tisha Be’av. “We have not learned anything from history, and I am angry and disappointed about that. There is no reason why a group that is trying with full force to steal from what little the Reform and Conservative movements have should receive their little part of the southern section of the Western Wall.” (See below for the full press release from the Ministry of Diaspora Affairs). In reaction to the incident, Blue and White MK Alon Tal, himself a member of an Israeli Conservative (Masorti) congregation, submitted a bill to the Knesset that would make the Kotel Compromise law. See here. JFNA has issued a statement on the Tisha B’Av protest that can be seen here. JFNA’s iRep — the Israel Religious Expression Platform — offers Federations a platform to work together to influence a range of issues to promote meaningful change to the religion-state status quo and advance religious freedom. iRep supports grassroots Israeli-based organizations and Reform, Conservative, and Modern Orthodox programs that tackle critical topics, such as expanding the range of marriage options, backing egalitarian prayer at the Western Wall, and encouraging equal status of open conversion initiatives. iRep’s Giving Guide can be seen here. As always, JFNA’s Israel office is keeping a close watch on developments and will update Federations as needed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Views Or Conclusions
    The American Public and Israel in the Twenty-First Century Eytan Gilboa Mideast Security and Policy Studies No. 181 THE BEGIN-SADAT CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY Mideast Security and Policy Studies No. 181 The American Public and Israel in the Twenty-First Century Eytan Gilboa The American Public and Israel in the Twenty-First Century Eytan Gilboa © The Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies Bar-Ilan University Ramat Gan 5290002 Israel Tel. 972-3-5318959 Fax. 972-3-5359195 [email protected] www.besacenter.org ISSN 0793-1042 October 2020 Cover image: Sheri Hooley via Unsplash The Begin-Sadat (BESA) Center for Strategic Studies The Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies is an independent, non-partisan think tank conducting policy-relevant research on Middle Eastern and global strategic affairs, particularly as they relate to the national security and foreign policy of Israel and regional peace and stability. It is named in memory of Menachem Begin and Anwar Sadat, whose efforts in pursuing peace laid the cornerstone for conflict resolution in the Middle East. Mideast Security and Policy Studies serve as a forum for publication or re-publication of research conducted by BESA associates. Publication of a work by BESA signifies that it is deemed worthy of public consideration but does not imply endorsement of the author’s views or conclusions. Colloquia on Strategy and Diplomacy summarize the papers delivered at conferences and seminars held by the Center for the academic, military, official and general publics. In sponsoring these discussions, the BESA Center aims to stimulate public debate on, and consideration of, contending approaches to problems of peace and war in the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • Mancom Israel Centre
    MANCOM OCTOBER ISRAEL CENTRE ()*+ Members of Knesset visit A delegation of Members of Knesset had an official visit (August) to South Africa. Organized jointly by the Knesset and The Jewish Agency in partnership with the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the South African Jewish community, the trip included high-level meetings with leaders from throughout South African society, as well as a series of meetings and visits aimed at deepening the Israeli lawmakers’ familiarity with South African Jewry. During their time in South Africa, the five Members of Knesset— representing both the coalition and the opposition—met with senior political figures from across the political spectrum. While in Johannesburg, the lawmakers met with the leaders of the local Jewish community and with Jewish Agency representatives, as well as with families who are about to immigrate to Israel. They also KDL and met with Jewish students, youth movement leaders, and alumni of Masa Israel Journey. In Cape Town, the MKs visited the South African Jewish Museum, the Holocaust Centre, and the local Herzlia School, and celebrated Shabbat at the Cape Town Hebrew Congregation (Gardens Shul). Throughout their time in South Africa, the delegates were accompanied by representatives of the South African Jewish Board of Deputies, the South African Zionist Federation, IUA-UCF (Keren Hayesod), and the Embassy of Israel in Pretoria, who helped organize the visit. Member of Knesset Dr. Nachman Shai (Zionist Union), who co-chairs the Knesset Caucus for Strengthening the Jewish World and led the delegation, said: “The delegation’s visit and meetings with the Jewish community dealt with the ties that bind the Jewish people worldwide, including Israel and the South African Jewish community.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Democracy: Fighting for the Ground Rules
    Project Democracy: Fighting for the Ground Rules Chapter 4: Freedom of Speech, Dissent, and Political Activity Freedom of speech is a basic human right and an essential component of any democracy. It is this freedom that enables citizens to exchange views and information, to protest against injustice, to influence the public discourse, and to criticize the actions of the government. As such, freedom of speech represents a necessary condition for the informed and effective political participation of a country's citizenry. Restrictions on free speech cause harm to democratic life and stands in contradiction to the fundamental principles of democracy – that government should impose no more than the necessary minimum of restrictions on individuals, especially regarding their basic rights. The safeguarding of free speech is especially critical for defending the rights of minority groups. Minorities often suffer from limited political influence and limited access to the corridors of power, and so the arena of public expression is where they are best able to give voice to their positions, to protest, and to influence public opinion. In numerous and unrelenting rulings and legal decisions, Israel's Supreme Court has defended freedom of speech, calling it “the lifeline of democracy.” In these principled rulings, time after time the justices have affirmed that the true test of freedom of speech is not the defense of commonly accepted statements – which no one seeks to limit anyway – but of statements considered irritating, extreme, and unexceptional. Over the last two years, we have witnessed increasing threats in Israel to freedom of speech and those freedoms which derive from it: The right to demonstrate, freedom of the press, academic freedom and freedom of political activity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contemporary Jewish Legal Treatment of Depressive Disorders in Conflict with Halakha
    t HaRofei LeShvurei Leiv: The Contemporary Jewish Legal Treatment of Depressive Disorders in Conflict with Halakha Senior Honors Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Undergraduate Program in Near Eastern and Judaic Studies Prof. Reuven Kimelman, Advisor Prof. Zvi Zohar, Advisor In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts by Ezra Cohen December 2018 Accepted with Highest Honors Copyright by Ezra Cohen Committee Members Name: Prof. Reuven Kimelman Signature: ______________________ Name: Prof. Lynn Kaye Signature: ______________________ Name: Prof. Zvi Zohar Signature: ______________________ Table of Contents A Brief Word & Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………... iii Chapter I: Setting the Stage………………………………………………………………………. 1 a. Why This Thesis is Important Right Now………………………………………... 1 b. Defining Key Terms……………………………………………………………… 4 i. Defining Depression……………………………………………………… 5 ii. Defining Halakha…………………………………………………………. 9 c. A Short History of Depression in Halakhic Literature …………………………. 12 Chapter II: The Contemporary Legal Treatment of Depressive Disorders in Conflict with Halakha…………………………………………………………………………………………. 19 d. Depression & Music Therapy…………………………………………………… 19 e. Depression & Shabbat/Holidays………………………………………………… 28 f. Depression & Abortion…………………………………………………………. 38 g. Depression & Contraception……………………………………………………. 47 h. Depression & Romantic Relationships…………………………………………. 56 i. Depression & Prayer……………………………………………………………. 70 j. Depression &
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As Of, January 27, 2015) Elections • in Israel, Elections for the Knesset A
    Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As of, January 27, 2015) Elections In Israel, elections for the Knesset are held at least every four years. As is frequently the case, the outgoing government coalition collapsed due to disagreements between the parties. As a result, the Knesset fell significantly short of seeing out its full four year term. Knesset elections in Israel will now be held on March 17, 2015, slightly over two years since the last time that this occurred. The Basics of the Israeli Electoral System All Israeli citizens above the age of 18 and currently in the country are eligible to vote. Voters simply select one political party. Votes are tallied and each party is then basically awarded the same percentage of Knesset seats as the percentage of votes that it received. So a party that wins 10% of total votes, receives 10% of the seats in the Knesset (In other words, they would win 12, out of a total of 120 seats). To discourage small parties, the law was recently amended and now the votes of any party that does not win at least 3.25% of the total (probably around 130,000 votes) are completely discarded and that party will not receive any seats. (Until recently, the “electoral threshold,” as it is known, was only 2%). For the upcoming elections, by January 29, each party must submit a numbered list of its candidates, which cannot later be altered. So a party that receives 10 seats will send to the Knesset the top 10 people listed on its pre-submitted list.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bennett-Lapid ‘Change Government’
    BICOM Briefing The Bennett-Lapid ‘Change Government’ June 2021 The Bennett-Lapid ‘Change Government’ On Wednesday evening, 2 June, Yesh Atid leader Yair Lapid informed President Rivlin that he had succeeded in forming a coalition government, adding that it would “work for all the citizens of Israel, those that voted for it and those that didn’t. It will do everything to unite Israeli society”. Swearing the new government into office, which only requires only a relative majority, will take place within the next 11 days. Yamina’s Naftali Bennett will serve as Prime Minister for the first two years, followed by Lapid. Maariv 1 June, Bennett and Lapid stare lovingly at eachother as the sun – with the face of Netan- yahu sets The Change Government How did we get here? The elections for the 24th Knesset which took place on 23 March 2021 gave neither the pro-Netanyahu bloc nor the anti-Netanyahu bloc a clear majority of 61 seats. Following the results, two parties who defined themselves as unaligned were considered to be key to both sides - Naftali Bennett of Yamina (7 seats) and Mansour Abbas of Raam (4 seats). Bennett emphasised his preference for a right-wing and ultra- Orthodox coalition. When Likud sources sent out feelers to Raam to support the government from outside 2 the coalition, that move was opposed by Bezalel Smotrich and his Religious Zionist party. With Saar unwilling to sit with Netanyahu, and Smotrich unwilling to countenance outside support from Raam, the pro-Netanyahu right-wing/ultra-Orthodox coalition could only muster 59 seats.
    [Show full text]
  • What Do You Think Are the Important Jewish Issues That Could Be
    What do you think are the important Jewish issues that could be significantly influenced by philanthropic intervention if the Jewish community could devote sufficient resources on a large scale? What types of interventions would be most effective? Dr. Nachman Shai was elected to the 18th Knesset in February 2009. In his capacity as a Knesset Member on behalf of the Kadima party, he is a member of the Foreign Affairs and Defence Committee; the Economic Affairs Committee and the Committee on the Status of Women. Nachman also serves as the Chairman of the Knesset Delegation to the European Parliament and chairs the Israel-United Kingdom Parliamentary Friendship Group, the Israel-Taiwan Parliamentary Friendship Group, the Israel-Belgium Parliamentary Friendship Group and the Lobby for the Promotion of Israel's Public Diplomacy. Immediately prior to his entry into the world of politics, Nachman held the position of Senior Vice President and Director General, External Affairs of the United Jewish Communities (UJC), Israel . Nachman has held diverse positions in the military, the media, the diplomatic and the public arenas. These include: Director General of the Ministry of Science, Culture and Sport; Israel Defense Force Spokesperson, with the rank of Brigadier General; Communications Advisor to the Minister of Defense; Director General of the Second Television and Radio Authority; Chairman of the Board of Directors of Channel 2 News Company and Chairman of the Israel Broadcasting Authority (IBA). Israel is at a very important juncture regarding its internal affairs – namely, the struggle for democracy and the continually deepening social crisis. As for democracy, the general public's inclination toward the religious right has brought heavy pressure on democratic institutions - the Supreme Court, the Knesset, the Media to conform with the political majority, and in this way, to harm the democratic foundations of the State.
    [Show full text]
  • OF 17Th 2004 Gender Relationships in Marriage and Out.Pdf (1.542Mb)
    Gender Relationships In Marriage and Out Edited by Rivkah Blau Robert S. Hirt, Series Editor THE MICHAEL SCHARF PUBLICATION TRUST of the YESHIVA UNIVERSITY PRESs New York OF 17 r18 CS2ME draft 8 balancediii iii 9/2/2007 11:28:13 AM THE ORTHODOX FORUM The Orthodox Forum, initially convened by Dr. Norman Lamm, Chancellor of Yeshiva University, meets each year to consider major issues of concern to the Jewish community. Forum participants from throughout the world, including academicians in both Jewish and secular fields, rabbis,rashei yeshivah, Jewish educators, and Jewish communal professionals, gather in conference as a think tank to discuss and critique each other’s original papers, examining different aspects of a central theme. The purpose of the Forum is to create and disseminate a new and vibrant Torah literature addressing the critical issues facing Jewry today. The Orthodox Forum gratefully acknowledges the support of the Joseph J. and Bertha K. Green Memorial Fund at the Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary established by Morris L. Green, of blessed memory. The Orthodox Forum Series is a project of the Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary, an affiliate of Yeshiva University OF 17 r18 CS2ME draft 8 balancedii ii 9/2/2007 11:28:13 AM Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Orthodox Forum (17th : 2004 : New York, NY) Gender relationships in marriage and out / edited by Rivkah Blau. p. cm. – (Orthodox Forum series) ISBN 978-0-88125-971-1 1. Marriage. 2. Marriage – Religious aspects – Judaism. 3. Marriage (Jewish law) 4. Man-woman relationships – Religious aspects – Judaism. I.
    [Show full text]
  • NAFTALI BENNETT INAUGURATION SPEECH at the Knesset in Jerusalem, Israel by Luis B
    NAFTALI BENNETT INAUGURATION SPEECH At the Knesset in Jerusalem, Israel by Luis B. Vega [email protected] www.PostScritpts.org ‘When Sanballat, Tobiah, Geshem the Arab, and the rest of our Enemies heard that I had rebuilt the Wall and not a gap was left, though to that time I had not yet installed the Doors in the Gates, Sanballat and Geshem sent me this message: Come, let us meet together in one of the villages on the plain of Ono. But they were planning to harm me.’ -Nehemiah 6:1-2 The purpose of this study is to 1st provide the official released Inauguration Speech of Israel’s new Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett. The 2nd purposed is to analyze key prophetic inferences related to the Last Days that are pertinent from the speech in light of a Christian perspective and interpretation of world event and Israel’s coming 70th Week for Years. It is very interesting how when such national events occur and the occasion is for a Transition of Government, for example, that such People invoke the Name of GOD, in this case, the GOD of Israel, YHVH. Bennett ended his speech with a prayer to ‘Our Heavenly Father, the Rock and Redeemer of Israel’. It is very interesting as it echoes the Triune Nature of YHVH being, Father, Son and the Holy Spirit. If one knows and has read the Gospel accounts of Jesus, it is striking how at the account of the Resurrection of Jesus, Mary Magdalene sought to locate the body of Jesus. Why? She came to the Garden Tomb and found that the Stone that had sealed the Tomb was rolled away.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Religious Zionism in Crisis?
    Is Religious Zionism in The Goal of Religious Zionism in Medinat Yisrael — Today By Rabbi Yaakov Filber Translated from Hebrew by Matis Greenblatt Medinat Yisrael, which came into being by miraculous us from our inception until now. In opposition stands means, presently stands at a crossroads. Secular Zionism Religious Zionism, which on the one hand is working to imagines that it has realized its goals and currently strives to preserve the Jewish character of Israeli society through its attain two objectives: (1) peace with its Arab neighbors, broad educational network, and on the other hand, is work- and (2) the continued formation of a Western state, made ing to establish settlements wherever possible to fight the up of Jews in the Middle East. In order to achieve these attempt to reduce the completeness of the Land. This twin goals it is prepared to pay a heavy price. In exchange for struggle carries a price: tension is created and deepens the peace, it advocates relinquishing sections of the birthplace gap between the various segments of Israeli society. But which were freed during the Six Day War; and on behalf of before discussing the state of Religious Zionism today, achieving a Western state, it is willing to become estranged Zionism in past generations will be described. from the unique Jewish way of life which has distinguished Since its birth 100 years ago, Zionism has brought about a revolution in the Jewish People which may be divided Rabbi Filber is one of the chief editors and expositors of Rav Koo k ’s into two periods: the first prior to the establishment of the wo r ks.
    [Show full text]
  • Rabbi Denise L. Eger's Sermon on Our 25Th Anniversary Shabbat Celebration
    Rabbi Denise L. Eger's sermon on our 25th Anniversary Shabbat Celebration Striking at Holy Rocks: On Chicago and Israel Rabbi Denise L. Eger Shabbat Shalom Tonight I had a different sermon. A sermon to celebrate our 25 years of our Congregation and to imagine together the next 25 years. But that will wait for another Shabbat because the events of the past week cry out to us. Affect us. Right in our kishkes—at our core. Two pivotal events one in Chicago and one in Israel speak to the nature of our communal identities and also to the core of what our congregation values are all about. For 25 years Kol Ami has given voice to values of inclusion and diversity. Long before it was fashionable. Before even Macy’s changed their logo for June to a rainbow. Long before any other synagogues marched in pride events, Kol Ami stood for LGBTQ Equality. Our original vision of our congregation was to be a place truly where gay and straight people together could create a dynamic Jewish home. 25 years ago most synagogues had no real place for Gay people –even Temple Israel up the street—wouldn’t let gay people have a commitment ceremony in their sanctuary. I know I officiated at the first one there for our temple members. Same thing at Steven S. Wise synagogue. I officiated there for two of our members. The rabbis didn’t or wouldn’t back then. Many day schools were not prepared to handle the children of Lesbian and Gay parents.
    [Show full text]
  • Meaning Making Under the Sacred Canopy: the Role of Orthodox Jewish Marriage Guidebooks
    ISSN 1556-3723 (print) Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion __________________________________________________________________ Volume 8 2012 Article 6 __________________________________________________________________ Meaning Making Under the Sacred Canopy: The Role of Orthodox Jewish Marriage Guidebooks Nurit Novis-Deutsch* Goldman Visiting Israeli Professor Berkeley Institute for Jewish Law and Israeli Law, Economy and Society University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Ari Engelberg Department of Sociology and Anthropology Hebrew University of Jerusalem Jerusalem, Israel * [email protected] Copyright © 2012 Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion is freely available on the World Wide Web at http://www.religjournal.com. Meaning Making Under the Sacred Canopy: The Role of Orthodox Jewish † Marriage Guidebooks Nurit Novis-Deutsch Goldman Visiting Israeli Professor Berkeley Institute for Jewish Law and Israeli Law, Economy and Society University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Ari Engelberg Department of Sociology and Anthropology Hebrew University of Jerusalem Jerusalem, Israel Abstract Marriage guidebooks for Orthodox Jews in Israel have become increasingly popular over the past few years. Previous research has shown that Jewish Orthodox Israelis are exposed to liberal Western ideals about romantic love and gender egalitarianism while continuing to uphold conservative family values. To gain insight into how leaders of Orthodox Jewish groups deal with these conflicting meaning systems, a representative sample of thirty guidebooks written for Re- ligious Zionist and Ultra-Orthodox Jews in Israel was analyzed by using a qualitative grounded theory analysis.
    [Show full text]