DOCSLIB.ORG

Energy Forum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Energy Forum ENERGY FORUM A QUARTERLY JOURNAL FOR DEBATING ENERGY ISSUES AND POLICIES CONTENTS Issue 75 November 2008 Middle East Political Stability Henry Siegman Lakhdar Brahimi In the Personal Commentary written for this issue by Andrew Gould Eric Rouleau the CEO of Schlumberger, the respective roles of services companies Walid Khadduri – page 3 and the international oil corporations are insightfully defined. Gould Whither OPEC? relates his analysis to Mark Moody-Stuart’s commentary published Robert Mabro in Forum 74 (August 2008) to which readers are referred for a fuller Bassam Fattouh – page 10 presentation of complementary views. He firmly believes that ‘the in- dustry can only satisfy society’s needs effectively when all the players Letters – page 16 clearly communicate their roles and relationships’. The contribution Personal Commentary of services companies is in technology and in the provision of first Andrew Gould – page 18 class skills that reflect the high quality of their staff. Trust between them and their customers is the most valuable asset; and this trust Asinus Muses – page 20 arises because competition is not involved in the relationship. The other articles in this issue are contributors all of whom have a long grouped under two themes. The first experience with, and often a direct which is covered by four contribu- involvement in, these matters. tions is the difficult subject of politi- I must add however that the stabil- cal stability in the Middle East. The ity issue involves other important importance of this topic for the oil elements from domestic political and gas industry is well recognised. conflicts, frustrations with the state At present a large share of world of economies and the lack of politi- production originates in this region; cal participation, resentment about and the huge reserves held by Mid- corruption, the impact of oil rev- dle East countries suggest that their enues on the distribution of income, role in supplying the world with oil to name but a few. Some of these and gas can only become more criti- may be addressed in future issues of cal in the long run. Forum. A host of factors are relevant to In a sharp analysis of the continual the stability problem. There are re- failure to solve the Arab–Israeli gional crises such as the Arab–Israeli problem, Henri Siegman points out conflict; international ones such that a country with the overwhelm- as the dispute over Iran’s nuclear ing advantages enjoyed by Israel ambitions; and internal instability rarely yields to the demands of a partly caused by foreign military very weak adversary. What is needed intervention in Iraq. These aspects is a powerful third party that can are addressed by distinguished restore the balance between Israel OXFORD ENERGY FORUM NOVEMBER 2008 and the Palestinians. The failure of many repeated Bassam Fattouh describes the relationship between attempts at ‘facilitation’ by the USA was not due OPEC and the world petroleum market result- to the lack of ideas but of a more critical lack of ing from the recent decision reducing production political will, in fact to cowardice. quotas as a dance in four stages or moves, some of which have already been made, and others are ex- The nuclear issue that has set the USA in associa- pected in the near future. He also points to cycles tion with other UN Security Council Members in the relationship with the market involving pas- plus Germany against Iran is analysed by Lakhdar sivity when prices are rising, except when political Brahimi, the veteran international mediator and pressure to intervene with production increases be- diplomat, and Eric Rouleau, the journalist and comes significant, and active responses when prices sometimes Ambassador who has followed the are too low or falling in a dangerous manner. Middle East for longer than five decades. Both Even then immediate success is a rare occurrence believe that the military option having been swept because of the initial scepticism of markets and the away by the problems in Iraq and Afghanistan long lags between the implementation of cuts and and the financial crisis is now leaving only the their impact at final destinations. ‘engagement’ policy as an option. Barack Obama’s election to the presidency (an event that occurred Forum is a debating journal. We welcome therefore after the articles were written) suggests that this letters to the Editor. We are publishing two letters option will indeed be pursued. This however here, and we encourage readers to write about the raises difficult questions about who will set the controversial issues addressed in this and other agenda of the negotiations, what the agenda will issues. consist of, and who will be involved other than the United States and Iran. My own question From time to time Asinus changes its identity and relates to the risk that Iran may read the US desire therefore its moods and style. A big thank you is to negotiate as a weakness and fail to make con- due to Robert (Bob) Sutcliffe who wrote the rubric cessions. What then? in a number of recent issues, and welcome to Paul Segal, an Asinus of a younger generation. Internal security in Iraq, a topic addressed by Wal- id Khadduri, is continually threatened by a long list of factors. The fundamental issue, however, is Contributors to this issue the failure to forge a social contract between the various population groups. Questions about the LAKHDAR BRAHIMI is a UN mediator and former future also arise – such as the role of the army, Foreign Minister of Algeria Iraq’s reaction to a worsening of the nuclear dis- pute over Iran and the regional policy of a future BASSAM FATTOUH is Reader in Finance at the Iraqi government. School of Oriental and African Studies and Senior Research Fellow at the OIES The second set of articles is about OPEC. This Organisation has come under fierce attack by lead- ANDREW GOU L D is Chairman and CEO of ers of OECD countries when oil prices rose during Schlumberger the first half of 2008. Some seem to have forgotten WA L ID KHADDURI is a consultant to the Middle that the reference prices of oil are determined in East Economic Survey the futures market, a financial institution, and not by OPEC. Robert Mabro shows that the ‘cartel’ RO B ERT MA B RO is Honorary President of label consistently and continually pinned on OIES OPEC is only applicable to certain short episodes. ERIC ROU L EAU is the former Middle East For a useful analysis of oil market’s behaviour it correspondent of Le Monde and French is important to understand correctly the role that ambassador to Tunisia OPEC plays in different times. The blanket use of the term cartel is an obstacle rather than a help to HENRY SIE G MAN is the director of the US/ understanding. Middle East Project in New York 2 OXFORD ENERGY FORUM NOVEMBER 2008 Middle East Political Stability Henry Siegman asks choices Palestinians have so often of that goal. That is something Israel made in pursuing their struggle for has refused to say to the Palestinians whether the next US statehood – from egregious failures and to the Syrians and that is why at institution-building, to murderous all previous negotiations have gotten President can rescue violence against innocent civilians, nowhere. a two-state solution to to the more recent fratricidal warfare between Fatah and Hamas for which the Israel–Palestine Fatah’s refusal to accept the demo- conflict cratic choice of the Palestinian people “The next occupant of the in the parliamentary elections of 2006 Oval Office will be the last deserves most of the blame. Rather, The next occupant of the Oval Office American president to be it is intended to say that the difficult will be the last American president to measures Palestinians must take to put able to save the two-state be able to save the two-state solution their house in order will remain be- to the Israel–Palestine conflict. If he solution to the Israel– yond their grasp unless they are given does not pursue and achieve this goal Palestine conflict” a credible and proximate commitment during the first year of his presidency, for a Palestinian state alongside of the two-state ‘horizon’ that President Israel that is ‘independent, viable George W. Bush pursued so ineffec- Of course, while in office, Olmert and sovereign’ as of right, not Israeli tively is likely to disappear for good. not only did nothing consistent with generosity. And because such a state But even a quick engagement by the this understanding, but until the very is indeed the right of the Palestinian new president will fare no better than last moment personally approved people, its acknowledgement must previous US peace initiatives – all of measures – such as authorising further precede, not follow, conditions that which have gotten nowhere – if he construction in the settlements and are set for its implementation. That and his advisors approach the task in East Jerusalem – that deepened such a clear commitment has not been believing that some more ‘peace the despair of Palestinians and made made to this day is far more revealing processing’ or ‘confidence-building a two-state solution an even more of Israeli intentions and US/European measures’ will achieve the goal that impossible dream. indifference than any number of eluded his predecessors. confidence-building measures that *** The Israel–Palestine conflict has defied have left entirely unchanged the US ‘facilitation’ over these many years Palestinians’ status as a people under The first and most decisive of the not because of procedural shortcom- the heel of a crushing and open-ended ignored fundamentals is the vast ings, nor because of a paucity of ideas.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gaza and the Palestinian Struggle for Statehood by Henry Siegman
    Expert Analysis August 2014 Gaza and the Palestinian Struggle for Statehood By Henry Siegman Executive summary The slaughter of Palestinian civilians and the Dresden-like reduction to rubble of large parts of Gaza by Israel’s military forces in the name of its own citizens’ security has exposed the hypocrisy at the heart of Israel’s dealings with the Palestinians. Israel’s claim to the right of self-defense in order to prevent its victims’ emergence from under its occupation is the ultimate definition of chutzpa. Without entering the debate over whether those rocket assaults were precipitated by Israel’s own violations of truces and cease-fire accords it negotiated with Hamas, as documented by various analysts (including Amira Hass, Peter Beinart, Nathan Thrall, Sara Roy and others), Israel’s claim to self-defense is based on a glaring falsehood. An occupying power is under obligation in international law to do two things: to end the occupa- tion, and until it does so, to protect the population under its occupation. Israel is in blatant violation of both of these obligations. The security threats to its own citizens it invokes to justify its assaults which regularly result in the killing of far more Palestinian non- combatants than militants are triggered by its occupation. An occupied people told by its occupiers its subjugation is permanent, and that they will never be allowed to exercise the right to national self-determination and sovereign existence on territories recognized by the interna- tional community as their rightful patrimony, has every right to resort to resistance, including violent resistance, to achieve its freedom, for they are reacting to the violence that is keeping them illegally under occupation.
    [Show full text]
  • Imposing Middle East Peace Forceful Outside Intervention Is the Only Alternative to an Unstable and Dangerous Status Quo
    18 The Nation. January 25, 2010 Imposing Middle East Peace Forceful outside intervention is the only alternative to an unstable and dangerous status quo. by HENRY SIEGMAN srael’s relentless drive to establish “facts Olmert was mistaken in one respect, for he on the ground” in the occupied West said Israel would turn into an apartheid state Bank, a drive that continues in violation when the Arab population in Greater Israel of even the limited settlement freeze outnumbers the Jewish population. But the to which Prime Minister Benjamin relative size of the populations is not the INeta nyahu committed himself, seems finally decisive factor in such a transition. Rather, to have succeeded in locking in the irrevers- the turning point comes when a state denies ibility of its colonial project. As a result of national self-determination to a part of its that “achievement,” one that successive population—even one that is in the minor- Israeli governments have long sought in ity—to which it has also denied the rights order to preclude the possibility of a two- of citizenship. state solution, Israel has crossed the thresh- When a state’s denial of the individual and PETER O. ZIERLEIN old from “the only democracy in the Middle national rights of a large part of its population East” to the only apartheid regime in the Western world. becomes permanent, it ceases to be a democracy. When the The inevitability of such a transformation has been held out reason for that double disenfranchisement is that population’s not by “Israel bashers” but by the country’s own leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations International Meeting in Support of Israeli-Palestinian Peace
    UNITED NATIONS INTERNATIONAL MEETING IN SUPPORT OF ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN PEACE The two-State solution: a key prerequisite for achieving peace and stability in the Middle East Moscow, 1 and 2 July 2015 ___________________________________________________________________________ CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY PLENARY III Efforts in the United Nations: the next steps Paper presented by Mr. Henry Siegman President U.S./Middle East Project New York CPR/IM/2015/15 2 The Two-State Solution is Dead. Long-live the Two-State Solution Anyone addressing a United Nations conference on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict at this time faces the difficult task of not allowing himself to be distracted by the many timely subjects that virtually cry out for comment—beginning with the report of the United Nations committee that investigated the Gaza war, the Israeli elections that resulted in an extreme right-wing, anti-democratic government, the Palestinian submission to the International Criminal Court, new initiatives for a Security Council peacemaking role, and the pathetic and chronic inability of Palestinian leadership to heal its internal divisions that constitute a gift to its enemies that keeps on giving. I will avoid these important subjects and limit my remarks to my assignment, defining the present situation and where we go from here. The two-state solution is dead. It did not die a natural death. It was strangulated as Jewish settlements in the West Bank were expanded and deepened by successive Israeli governments with the express purpose of preventing the emergence of a viable Palestinian state. The settlement project has achieved its intended irreversibility, not only because of its breadth and depth but also because of the dominant political clout of the settlers and their supporters within Israel who have both ideological and economic stakes in a Greater Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • No Peace Possible Between Israel and Palestinians Without Hamas
    Siegman- No Peace Possible without Hamas 1/4 Siegman: No Peace Possible Between Israel and Palestinians without Hamas - Es gibt keinen Frieden zwischen Israel und Palästinensern ohne Hamas Henry Siegman, Direktor des United States/Middle East Project, im Interview Im Folgenden dokumentieren wir ein Interview, das im März 2008 mit Henry Siegman, dem Di- rektor des United States/Middle East Project des Council on Foreign Relations gemacht wurde. Henry Siegman war früher Direktor des American Jewish Congress und gilt als einer der bes- ten Kenner des Nahost-Konflikts. Die Auffassungen, die Siegmann hier vertritt, decken sich weitgehend mit einem Artikel, den er am 10. April 2008 in der Süddeutschen Zeitung veröffentlichte: "Israels falsche Freunde". Siegman: No Peace Possible Between Israel and Palestinians without Hamas Interviewee: Henry Siegman, Director, United States/Middle East Project Interviewer: Bernard Gwertzman, Consulting Editor March 7, 2008 Henry SiegmanHenry Siegman, an expert on Middle East negotiations, says that no peace will be possible between Israel and Palestinians unless Hamas is brought into the process. “The notion that the Israeli government leaders and our own government have that it is possible to exclude Hamas from peace talks and have a successful result from those talks is a fantasy,” he says. “It’s not going to happen.” Because of President Bush’s refusal to deal with Hamas, he says, it is unlikely that any pro- gress can be made until there is a new president in the White House. There’s a bit of a lull right now in the fighting between Hamas and Israel, which has led to over one hundred Palestinians dead and a few Israelis in the past couple of weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Transitional Justice and Post-Conflict Israel/Palestine: Assessing the Applicability of the Truth Commission Paradigm, 38 Case W
    Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 38 Issue 2 2006-2007 2007 Transitional Justice and Post-Conflict Israel/ Palestine: Assessing the Applicability of the Truth Commission Paradigm Ariel Meyerstein Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Ariel Meyerstein, Transitional Justice and Post-Conflict Israel/Palestine: Assessing the Applicability of the Truth Commission Paradigm, 38 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 281 (2007) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol38/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE AND POST-CONFLICT ISRAEL/PALESTINE: ASSESSING THE APPLICABILITY OF THE TRUTH COMMISSION PARADIGM Ariel Meyerstein * Redemption lies in remembering. The Baal Shem Tov I. INTRODU CTION .....................................................................................282 II. UNDERSTANDING THE REALITY OF INTERCONNECTIVITY ...................285 A. Interconnectivity and the "Peace& ProsperityParadigm .........285 B. The CurrentMoment: Paralysis.................................................... 291 C. The Conflict Culture, Victim Ideologies, and the Needfor Critical H istory ..............................................................................297
    [Show full text]
  • Hamas: Background and Issues for Congress
    Hamas: Background and Issues for Congress Jim Zanotti Analyst in Middle Eastern Affairs December 2, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41514 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Hamas: Background and Issues for Congress Summary This report and its appendixes provide background information on Hamas, or the Islamic Resistance Movement, and U.S. policy towards it. It also includes information and analysis on (1) the threats Hamas currently poses to U.S. interests, (2) how Hamas compares with other Middle East terrorist groups, (3) Hamas’s ideology and policies (both generally and on discrete issues), (4) its leadership and organization, and (5) its sources of assistance. Finally, the report raises and discusses various legislative and oversight options related to foreign aid strategies, financial sanctions, and regional and international political approaches. In evaluating these options, Congress can assess how Hamas has emerged and adapted over time, and also scrutinize the track record of U.S., Israeli, and international policy to counter Hamas. Hamas is a Palestinian Islamist military and sociopolitical movement that grew out of the Muslim Brotherhood. The United States, Israel, the European Union, and Canada consider Hamas a terrorist organization because of (1) its violent resistance to what it deems Israeli occupation of historic Palestine (constituting present-day Israel, West Bank, and Gaza Strip), and (2) its rejection of the off-and-on peace process involving Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) since the early 1990s. Since Hamas’s inception in 1987, it has maintained its primary base of political support and its military command in the Gaza Strip—a territory it has controlled since June 2007—while also having a significant presence in the West Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming the Palestinian Authority: an Update
    REFORMING THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY: AN UPDATE April 2004 Report by the INDEPENDENT TASK FORCE ON STRENGTHENING PALESTINIAN PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS Michel Rocard, Chair Henry Siegman, Director Yezid Sayigh and Khalil Shikaki, Principal Authors For further information about this Independent Task Force report, please contact Henry Siegman, U.S./Middle East Project, Council on Foreign Relations, 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021, telephone (212) 434-9658, fax (212) 434-9894, or email [email protected]. Copyright © 2004 by the Independent Task Force on Strengthening Palestinian Public Institutions. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. This report may be quoted or reproduced, provided the appropriate credit is given to the Independent Task Force on Strengthening Palestinian Public Institutions. 2 CONTENTS Preface 4 Introduction 5 I. The Palestinian Authority Reform Process A. Background 6 B. The Abu Mazen Government (March 2003 – September 2003) 7 C. The Abu Ala’ Government (September 2003 – Present) 8 II. The Impact of Israeli Unilateral Withdrawal from Gaza A. General Prognosis 10 B. Anticipating the Gaza Withdrawal 13 C. Israel’s Role 14 III. The International Community’s Role A. PA Reform 16 B. Israeli Withdrawal from Gaza 17 IV. Appendices 18 3 PREFACE In 1998, the Independent Task Force on Strengthening Palestinian Public Institutions was commissioned by the European Commission and the Government of Norway to undertake a comprehensive study of Palestinian institution building – in the words of the report it issued in 1999, “to determine what is right, what is wrong, and how to fix it.” The report, Strengthening Palestinian Public Institutions, published in both English and Arabic, remains the most detailed and authoritative guide on the subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Transatlantic Dialogue on Middle East Policy’
    Conference Report ‘Transatlantic Dialogue on Middle East Policy’ The Hague, Friday 5th March 2004 International meeting of experts organised by the Clingendael Institute (The Hague) In collaboration with the Council on Foreign Relations (New York) June 2004 Desk top publishing: Cheryna Abdoel Wahid Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’ Clingendael 7 2597 VH The Hague Telephone: xx-31-70-3245384 Telefax: xx-31-70-3746667 P.O. Box 93080 2509 AB The Hague E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.clingendael.nl © Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyrightholders. Clingendael Institute, P.O. Box 93080, 2509 AB The Hague, The Netherlands © The Clingendael Institute 3 Contents Foreword Dalia Dassa Kaye, Alfred Pijpers 5 Programme of the Conference 7 Words of Welcome Alfred van Staden 9 Introductory Session – Europe and the US in the Middle East. Past, Present and Future Robert Malley 11 William Wallace 17 Debate 23 Session: Gulf Policy Gregory Gause 27 Volker Perthes 33 Jon Alterman 37 Debate 41 Session: The Future of the Middle East Peace Process Henry Siegman 49 Steven Everts 53 Stefano Silvestri 59 Debate 63 Session: Weapons of Mass Destruction and Terrorism Jonathan Stevenson 73 Peter van Ham 81 Mark Heller 85 Debate 87 Conclusion Jim Goldgeier 91 Epilogue Dalia Dassa Kaye 93 List of Participants 97 © The Clingendael Institute 5 Foreword The idea for this seminar emerged before the rift in transatlantic relations occasioned by the Iraq war in 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relevance of Reconciliation Actions in the Breakdown of Israeli–Palestinian Negotiations, 20001 by Louis Kriesberg
    The Relevance of Reconciliation Actions in the Breakdown of Israeli–Palestinian Negotiations, 20001 by Louis Kriesberg The breakdown of Israeli–Palestinian negotiations toward a final status agreement and the subsequent eruption of violence stunned many partisans of the conflict as well as intermediaries and observers. Although some partisans on each side had argued from the outset that successful negotiations were impossible, leaders of the Palestinians and the Israelis had negotiated directly for several years as if they were possible. The Israeli–Palestinian conflict had become partially transformed but perhaps insufficiently so to support a negotiated agreement acceptable to both sides. The possible role of what might be regarded as reconciliation actions in that partial transformation of the conflict is examined here. The negotiation and mediation processes prior to the breakdown are reviewed, and then different views of the impact of reconciliation actions, or their absence, are assessed. For a decade, beginning with the Madrid Peace Conference in October 1991, Israeli–Palestinian peace negotiations have taken place. The course of the negotiations has been torturous, with steps of progress marked by recurrent stumbles, backsliding, noncompliance with agreements, and deadly violence. Explanations for the difficulties abound, and observers as well as partisans dispute the correct explanation. I examine here the possible effects of recon- ciliation moves, or the lack of them, in explaining the collapse of the negotia- tions and the subsequent violence beginning in September 2000.2 Reconciliation often is considered to be what happens after a conflict is over. An outcome may be unilaterally imposed, and then reconciliation may follow, as was the case between Germany and the victorious countries of World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • THE OCCUPATION of the AMERICAN MIND Israel’S Public Relations War in the U.S
    THE OCCUPATION OF THE AMERICAN MIND Israel’s Public Relations War in the U.S. [Transcript] Introduction Text on screen: “It doesn't matter if justice is on your side. You have to depict your position as just.” – Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel Narrator: On July 8, 2014, Israel launched a devastating military attack on the Gaza Strip. Over the course of 51 days, the Israeli military dropped nearly 20,000 tons of explosives on Gaza, a densely populated area the size of Philadelphia, killing over 2,000 Palestinians and wounding tens of thousands more. The overwhelming majority of these casualties were civilians. Television news montage: This strip of land is being bombarded from the air, sea, and land… Israel launched at least 160 strikes on the Gaza strip… And there’s one less hospital in Gaza now. Israel today flattened Wafa Hospital. Narrator: The sheer scale of the attacks sparked outrage and condemnation around the world. News anchor: Israel’s month-long pounding of Gaza shocked many people around the world. Mass demonstrations have been held in many of the world’s major cities. Narrator: But in the United States, the story was different. Polls showed the American people holding firm in their support for Israel. Anderson Cooper, CNN anchor: This is the latest CNN-ORC poll of Americans – shows 57% of those polled say Israel’s action in Gaza is justified, 34% say unjustified. Narrator: These numbers were striking, but they weren’t new. Over the course of a conflict in which Palestinian casualties have far outnumbered Israeli casualties, the American people have consistently shown far more sympathy for Israelis than for Palestinians.
    [Show full text]
  • Imposing Middle East Peace
    No. 3 January 2010 Noref Report Imposing Middle East Peace Henry Siegman Summary Locked in The continued expansion of Israeli settlements in the Israel’s relentless drive to establish “facts on the ground” West Bank seems to have finally locked in the perma- in the occupied West Bank, a drive that continues in vi- nence of Israel’s colonial project. Israel has crossed olation of even the limited settlement freeze to which the threshold from the Middle East’s only democracy Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu committed him- to the only “apartheid regime” in the Western world. self, seems finally to have succeeded in locking in the But outside intervention may offer the last hope for a irreversibility of its colonial project. As a result of that reversal of the settlement enterprise and the achieve- “achievement,” one that successive Israeli governments ment of a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine have long sought in order to preclude the possibility of a conflict. Since the US is no longer the likely agent of two-state solution, Israel has crossed the threshold from that intervention, it is up to the Europeans and to the “the only democracy in the Middle East” to the only Palestinians themselves to fashion the path to self- apartheid regime in the Western world. determination in the occupied territories. Essential to the success of these efforts is setting aright the The inevitability of such a transformation has been held chronic imbalance of power between Israel and the out not by “Israel bashers” but by the country’s own lead- Palestinians.
    [Show full text]
  • Isreali and Palestinian Intellectuals Who Reject the Current Peace Process Justus R
    Cornell International Law Journal Volume 29 Article 3 Issue 2 1996 Peace and Its Discounts: Isreali and Palestinian Intellectuals Who Reject the Current Peace Process Justus R. Weiner Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Weiner, Justus R. (1996) "Peace and Its Discounts: Isreali and Palestinian Intellectuals Who Reject the Current Peace Process," Cornell International Law Journal: Vol. 29: Iss. 2, Article 3. Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj/vol29/iss2/3 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell International Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REVIEW ESSAY Peace and Its Discontents: Israeli and Palestinian Intellectuals Who Reject the Current Peace Process Justus R. Weiner* Peace and Its Discontents: Essays on Palestine in the Middle East Peace Process. By Edward W. Said. (Vintage Press, 1995); Crisis In: Israel-A Peace Plan to Resist. By Yechiel M. Leiter (SPI Books, 1994). 1 Introduction The title of Edward Said's book, Peace and Its Discontents,2 is, as he would readily acknowledge, in error. No "peace" currently exists between Israel and the Palestinians. The protracted process that began with secret meet- ings in Norway three years ago has thus far yielded five interim agree- ments,3 each of which advanced the process incrementally. The * The author is an international human rights lawyer and a member of the Israel and New York Bar Associations.
    [Show full text]