DOCSLIB.ORG

Fifty Years After the Twenty-Fifth Amendment: Recommendations for Improving the Presidential Succession System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fifty Years After the Twenty-Fifth Amendment: Recommendations for Improving the Presidential Succession System Fordham Law Review Volume 86 Issue 3 Article 3 2017 Fifty Years After the Twenty-Fifth Amendment: Recommendations for Improving the Presidential Succession System Second Fordham University School of Law Clinic on Presidential Succession Fordham University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Recommended Citation Second Fordham University School of Law Clinic on Presidential Succession, Fifty Years After the Twenty- Fifth Amendment: Recommendations for Improving the Presidential Succession System, 86 Fordham L. Rev. 917 (2017). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol86/iss3/3 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Fifty Years After the Twenty-Fifth Amendment: Recommendations for Improving the Presidential Succession System Erratum Law; Constitutional Law; Law and Politics; Law and Society; Legal History; President/Executive Department; Legislation This report is available in Fordham Law Review: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol86/iss3/3 REPORT FIFTY YEARS AFTER THE TWENTY-FIFTH AMENDMENT: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVING THE PRESIDENTIAL SUCCESSION SYSTEM Second Fordham University School of Law Clinic on Presidential Succession* ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................ 921 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 922 I. OVERVIEW OF THE PRESIDENTIAL SUCCESSION SYSTEM ..................... 925 A. The Twenty-Fifth Amendment ................................................... 925 B. Defining Inability in the Twenty-Fifth Amendment .................. 928 1. Inability in Section 3 .......................................................... 928 2. Inability in Section 4 .......................................................... 929 II. EXECUTIVE BRANCH CONTINGENCY PLANNING ................................. 929 A. Prospective Declarations .......................................................... 930 1. The Need for Prospective Declarations ............................. 931 2. Prospective Declarations as Part of White House Contingency Planning ....................................................... 933 3. How Prospective Declarations Would Work ..................... 934 4. Legal Basis for Prospective Declarations .......................... 935 B. Providing for Mental Healthcare in the White House .............. 937 * The Second Fordham University School of Law Clinic on Presidential Succession developed this seminal Report to continue the discussion around presidential disability and the Twenty-Fifth Amendment. The Clinic’s fourteen students developed this Report under the supervision of Dean John D. Feerick and Professor John G. Rogan. Professor Rogan edited the Report. The Clinic students are Naomi Babu, Jonathan Coppola, Timothy Deal, Morgan Green, Gareth Horell, Marcella Jayne, Nicole Manganiello, Edgar Mendoza, Nikole Devaris Morgulis, Alison Park, Bronwyn Roantree, Ryan Surujnath, Javed Yunus, and Kaitlyn Zacharias. The students presented the Clinic’s recommendations at the symposium entitled Continuity in the Presidency: Gaps and Solutions held at Fordham University School of Law on September 27, 2017. For an overview of the symposium, see Matthew Diller, Foreword: Continuity in the Presidency: Gaps and Solutions, 86 FORDHAM L. REV. 911 (2017). For a video recording of the panel, see Continuity in the Presidency: Gaps and Solutions—Building on the Legacy of the Twenty-Fifth Amendment, Part 2, FORDHAM L. ARCHIVE SCHOLARSHIP & HIST. (Sept. 27, 2017), http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/twentyfifth_amendment_photos/11/ [https://perma.cc/JR2C-W587]. 917 918 FORDHAM LAW REVIEW [Vol. 86 1. Mental Illnesses and Impairments in Presidents ................ 938 2. Monitoring and Treating Mental Illness in the White House ................................................................................ 940 3. Discussion of Recommendations ....................................... 943 III. THE LINE OF SUCCESSION .................................................................. 944 A. History and Current Line of Succession Statute ....................... 945 B. Problems with the Composition of the Line of Succession ....... 946 1. Problems Posed by Legislators in the Line of Succession . 946 a. Preparedness of Legislators ......................................... 946 b. Perverse Incentives ...................................................... 947 c. Party Continuity ........................................................... 948 d. Democratic Legitimacy ................................................ 948 e. Questionable Constitutionality ..................................... 949 f. The Bumping Provision ................................................. 949 2. Qualifications of Cabinet Members in the Line of Succession ......................................................................... 950 3. Geographic Vulnerability ................................................... 951 C. Recommended Composition of the Line of Succession ............. 952 1. Standing Successors ........................................................... 952 2. Alternatives to Removing Legislators ................................ 954 a. Remove Legislators from the Line of Succession in Cases of Temporary Disability or Removal from Office .......................................................................... 954 b. Reorder Legislators to the End of the Line of Succession ................................................................... 954 c. Remove the Bumping Provision ................................... 954 D. Other Line of Succession Reforms ............................................ 954 1. Statutory Ambiguity About Acting Secretaries ................. 954 2. Inauguration Day Vulnerability ......................................... 956 3. Preparing for Succession .................................................... 958 IV. DUAL AND VICE PRESIDENTIAL INABILITY........................................ 958 A. Proposed Statute for Dual Inability .......................................... 959 B. Constitutional and Practical Justification for Dual Inability Statute ..................................................................................... 962 1. Constitutional Basis ........................................................... 962 a. The Succession Clause ................................................. 962 b. The Necessary and Proper Clause ............................... 963 2. Practical Basis: The Contingent Grant-of-Power Theory and the Twenty-Fifth Amendment .................................... 963 C. Proposed Statute for Vice Presidential Inability ...................... 964 1. Constitutional Basis ........................................................... 966 a. The Succession Clause ................................................. 966 b. Executive Continuity Principle .................................... 966 2017] IMPROVING PRESIDENTIAL SUCCESSION 919 c. Necessary and Proper Clause ...................................... 967 2. Precedential Authority ....................................................... 968 3. Alternatives ........................................................................ 968 a. Prospective Declarations of Inability and Resignation ................................................................. 969 b. Impeachment ................................................................ 969 c. Alternative Parties ........................................................ 970 V. CONGRESS’S ROLE UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE TWENTY-FIFTH AMENDMENT .................................................................................. 971 A. Guiding Principles .................................................................... 972 1. Informed Deliberations ...................................................... 972 2. Urgency and Efficiency ..................................................... 972 3. Democratic and Procedural Legitimacy ............................. 973 4. Fairness to the President .................................................... 973 5. “Constitutional Morality” and Deterring Partisanship ....... 973 B. Recommendation for a Congressional Procedure Under Section 4 .................................................................................. 974 1. Format of the Proceedings ................................................. 974 a. Proposal for a Joint Committee ................................... 974 b. Justifications for a Bipartisan Joint Committee Established from the Senate Rules and House Judiciary Committees ................................................. 975 2. Expedited Procedures for the Committee’s Work and for Consideration in Both Houses ........................................... 977 3. Subpoena Powers ............................................................... 978 4. Due Process to the President .............................................. 979 5. Information and Publicity .................................................. 979 C. Legal Issues .............................................................................. 981 1. Privileges ........................................................................... 981 a. Overriding Executive Privilege
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jesus in China—Evan Osnos on an Upcoming Frontline Documentary
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln The hinC a Beat Blog Archive 2008-2012 China Beat Archive 6-22-2008 Jesus in China—Evan Osnos on an Upcoming Frontline Documentary Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/chinabeatarchive Part of the Asian History Commons, Asian Studies Commons, Chinese Studies Commons, and the International Relations Commons "Jesus in China—Evan Osnos on an Upcoming Frontline Documentary" (2008). The China Beat Blog Archive 2008-2012. 205. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/chinabeatarchive/205 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the China Beat Archive at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in The hinC a Beat Blog Archive 2008-2012 by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Jesus in China—Evan Osnos on an Upcoming Frontline Documentary June 22, 2008 in Watching the China Watchers by The China Beat | No comments The Public Broadcasting Corporation’s Frontline series has a long tradition of airing documentaries on China. Carma Hinton and Richard Gordon’s prize-winning look at 1989, “The Gate of Heavenly Peace,” was shown as part of the series, for example, as was a later Tiananmen documentary, “The Tank Man.” And thanks to the online extras, from guides to further reading to lesson plans for teachers, the PBS Frontline site has become a valuable resource for those who offer classes or simply want to learn about the PRC. Still, it is rare (probably unprecedented) for two China shows to run back-to-back on Frontline.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Use This Guide
    How to Use this Guide The New-York Historical Society, one of America’s pre-eminent cultural institutions, is dedicated to fostering research, presenting history and art exhibitions, and public programs that reveal the dynamism of history and its influence on the world of today. Founded in 1804, New-York Historical has a mission to explore the richly layered political, cultural and social history of New York City and State and the nation, and to serve as a national forum for the discussion of issues surrounding the making and meaning of history. Student Historians are high school interns at New-York Historical who explore our museum and library collection and conduct research using the resources available to them within a museum setting. Their project this academic year was to create a guide for fellow high school students preparing for U.S. History Exams, particularly the U.S. History & Government Regents Exam. Each Student Historian chose a piece from our collection that represents a historical event or theme often tested on the exam, collected and organized their research, and wrote about their piece within its historic context. The intent is that this catalog will provide a valuable supplemental review material for high school students preparing for U.S. History Exams. The following summative essays are all researched and written by the 2015-16 Student Historians, compiled in chronological order, and organized by unit. Each essay includes an image of the object or artwork from the N-YHS collection that serves as the foundation for the U.S. History content reviewed. Additional educational supplementary materials include a glossary of frequently used terms, review activities including a crossword puzzle as well as questions and answers taken from past U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History Interview – 2/10/2003 Administrative Information
    Sid Davis Oral History Interview – 2/10/2003 Administrative Information Creator: Sid Davis Interviewer: Vicki Daitch Date of Interview: February 10, 2003 Place of Interview: Washington D.C. Length: 76 pages Biographical Note Davis was a journalist, a White House correspondent (1959-1968) and Washington News Bureau chief (1968-1977) for the Westinghouse Broadcasting; director (1977-1979), bureau chief (1979-1980), and vice president and bureau chief (1980-1982) for NBC News; and a senior Washington correspondent (1982-1987) and director of office programs for the Voice of America (1987-1994). In this interview, he discusses the 1960 presidential campaign, John F. Kennedy’s assassination and Lyndon B. Johnson’s swearing in, and the press coverage of the White House, among other issues. Access Open. Usage Restrictions According to the deed of gift signed on April 5, 2004, copyright of these materials has been assigned to the United States Government. Users of these materials are advised to determine the copyright status of any document from which they wish to publish. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excesses of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Branch
    EXECUTIVE BRANCH THE PRESIDENT BARACK H. OBAMA, Senator from Illinois and 44th President of the United States; born in Honolulu, Hawaii, August 4, 1961; received a B.A. in 1983 from Columbia University, New York City; worked as a community organizer in Chicago, IL; studied law at Harvard University, where he became the first African American president of the Harvard Law Review, and received a J.D. in 1991; practiced law in Chicago, IL; lecturer on constitutional law, University of Chicago; member, Illinois State Senate, 1997–2004; elected as a Democrat to the U.S. Senate in 2004; and served from January 3, 2005, to November 16, 2008, when he resigned from office, having been elected President; family: married to Michelle; two children: Malia and Sasha; elected as President of the United States on November 4, 2008, and took the oath of office on January 20, 2009. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 20500 Eisenhower Executive Office Building (EEOB), 17th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 20500, phone (202) 456–1414, http://www.whitehouse.gov The President of the United States.—Barack H. Obama. Special Assistant to the President and Personal Aide to the President.— Anita Decker Breckenridge. Director of Oval Office Operations.—Brian Mosteller. OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT phone (202) 456–1414 The Vice President.—Joseph R. Biden, Jr. Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff to the Vice President.—Bruce Reed, EEOB, room 276, 456–9000. Deputy Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff to Dr. Jill Biden.—Sheila Nix, EEOB, room 200, 456–7458.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion Film File Title Listing
    Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum (714) 983 9120 ◦ http://www.nixonlibrary.gov ◦ [email protected] MOTION FILM FILE ● MFF-001 "On Guard for America: Nixon for U.S. Senator TV Spot #1" (1950) One of a series of six: On Guard for America", TV Campaign spots. Features Richard M. Nixon speaking from his office" Participants: Richard M. Nixon Original Format: 16mm film Film. Original source type: MPPCA. Cross Reference: MVF 47 (two versions: 15 min and 30 min);. DVD reference copy available ● MFF-002 "On Guard For America: Nixon for U.S. Senator TV Spot #2" (1950) One of a series of six "On Guard for America", TV campaign spots. Features Richard Nixon speaking from his office Participants: Richard M. Nixon Original Format: 16mm film Film. Original source type: MPPCA. DVD reference copy available ● MFF-003 "On Guard For America: Nixon for U.S. Senator TV Spot #3" (1950) One of a series of six "On Guard for America", TV campaign spots. Features Richard Nixon speaking from his office. Participants: Richard M. Nixon Original Format: 16mm film Film. Original source type: MPPCA. DVD reference copy available Monday, August 06, 2018 Page 1 of 202 Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum (714) 983 9120 ◦ http://www.nixonlibrary.gov ◦ [email protected] MOTION FILM FILE ● MFF-004 "On Guard For America: Nixon for U.S. Senator TV Spot #4" (1950) One of a series of six "On Guard for America", TV campaign spots. Features Richard Nixon speaking from his office. Participants: Richard M. Nixon Original Format: 16mm film Film. Original source type: MPPCA.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.22: What Kind of Day Has It Been
    The West Wing Weekly 1.22: What Kind of Day Has It Been [Intro Music] HRISHI: You’re listening the The West Wing Weekly, I’m Hrishikesh Hirway JOSH: ..and I’m Joshua Malina HRISHI: Today, we’re talking about the finale of season one JOSH: Woo! HRISHI: It’s episode 22, and it’s called ‘What kind of day has it been’. JOSH: It was written by Aaron Sorkin, it was directed by Tommy Schlamme, and it originally aired on May 17th, in the year 2000. HRISHI: Here’s a synopsis.. JOSH: A hrynopsis? HRISHI: [laughs] Sure.. JOSH: I just wanted to make sure because, you know, it’s an important distinction. HRISHI: An American fighter jet goes down in Iraq, and a rescue mission ensues to find the pilot. But, it’s a covert operation, so CJ has to mislead the press. Toby’s brother is onboard the space shuttle Columbia, but it’s having mechanical difficulties and can’t land. Plus, Josh has to meet with the Vice President to bring him around to the Bartlet administration's plans for campaign finance. President Bartlet travels to Rosalind, Virginia, to speak at the Newseum and give a live town hall meeting. But as they’re exiting, S#&* goes down and shots ring out. JOSH: Well done HRISHI: Before we even get into the episode though, Josh, I want to ask you about the title. ‘What kind of day has it been’ is a very Sorkin title, it’s been the finale for lots of things that he’s done before.
    [Show full text]
  • American Government (POL SC 1100) Spring 2019 Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays, 2-2:50Pm 102 Naka Hall
    POL SC 1100-1-1-1-1 American Government (POL SC 1100) Spring 2019 Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays, 2-2:50pm 102 Naka Hall Jake Haselswerdt, PhD Assistant Professor Department of Political Science & Truman School of Public Affairs Office: 301 Professional Building Office hours: Tuesday, 2-4pm, and by appointment Email (preferred): [email protected] Phone: 573-882-7873 Syllabus updated February 15, 2019 Teaching Assistants Hyojong Ahn Dongjin Kwak Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Office: 315 Professional Building Office: 207 Professional Building Office hours: Monday, 10:30am-1:30pm; Office hours: Monday & Wednesday, Tuesday, 12:30pm-3:30pm 10am-1pm Course Overview & Goals This course offers an introduction to American politics and government from a political science perspective. While the course should increase your factual civic knowledge of American institutions, it is about more than that. Political science seeks to move beyond civic knowledge, to question and analyze the people, groups, events, institutions, policies, ideas, etc that we observe. Sometimes, our questions are empirical, meaning they deal with what is: Do Members of Congress support the policies their constituents want? Do political campaigns affect voters’ decisions? Sometimes, they are normative, meaning they deal with what should be: Is the U.S. Senate harmful to democracy because Wyoming has the same number of senators as California? Should the Constitution be amended so Supreme Court Justices no longer serve for life? In this course, we will consider both types of questions. 1 POL SC 1100-1-1-1-1 The success of democratic governments depends in part on the capacity of their citizens to hold them accountable.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Chairman Reince Priebus C/O Republican National Committee
    Chairman Reince Priebus C/O Republican National Committee 310 First Street, SE Washington, DC 20003 April 8, 2013 Dear Chairman Priebus, We write to express our great displeasure with the RNC commissioned report titled Growth and Opportunity Project. As individuals and organizations which represent millions of grassroots, faith-based voters who have supported (politically and financially) thousands of Republican candidates who share our values, we write to say: The Republican Party makes a huge historical mistake if it intends to dismantle this coalition by marginalizing social conservatives and avoiding the issues which attract and energize them by the millions. Unfortunately, the report dismisses the Reagan Coalition as a political relic of the past. It’s important to remember that from 1932-1980, the Republican Party was a permanent minority party. Political debate was confined to economic issues like the expansion of the Federal Government, taxes, and national security. It was not until 1980 with key changes in the GOP Platform and the nomination of Ronald Reagan that social conservatives were clearly invited to be an important addition to this coalition. Millions of “Reagan Democrats” voted not only for President Ronald Reagan, but became active in supporting other GOP candidates who shared their faith-based family values. That’s how Republicans achieved many successes since 1980 at every level of government. The report states on page seven that “America looks different.” It certainly does, but here are some facts about minority outreach…not opinions and theories from DC Consultants: 1 1. In 2004, President Bush carried Ohio because of the outreach to African-American pastors supporting a traditional marriage amendment on the ballot.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 8 FLORIDA Florida First Emerged on the Presidential
    CHAPTER 8 FLORIDA Florida first emerged on the presidential primary scene in 1988, when it was one of the southern states that participated in the first-ever Super Tuesday. Four years later, in 1992, Florida was propelled to the front rank of important primary states when the news media selected it for the final showdown between Governor Bill Clinton of Arkansas and former- U.S. Senator Paul Tsongas of Massachusetts. In the 1992 race for the Democratic nomination for president, Paul Tsongas got off to a fast start by winning the New Hampshire primary. Tsongas next won the Maryland primary, but that same day Bill Clinton swept to victory in the southern state of Georgia. The two candidates thus were running neck and neck when they faced off against one another in Florida on the second Tuesday in March. Although located in the South and one of the states that seceded from the Union during the American Civil War, Florida is not considered a typical southern state by voting-behavior analysts. The major reason for this is the large number of former northern voters who have moved to South Florida, either to retire or to enjoy the outdoor lifestyle of one of the fastest-growing states in the nation. These former northerners were viewed as ripe targets for the Paul Tsongas campaign. His heavy Massachusetts accent would not sound quite so strange to them, and his New Hampshire and Maryland primary victories already had demonstrated his strong appeal to people from the northern part of the nation. Furthermore, in the 1988 presidential elec- tion, Florida had voted for Democratic presidential candidate Michael Dukakis, like Tsongas a Greek from Massachusetts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nixon-Ford-Kissinger Years, 1969-1976
    Nixon, Kissinger and Vietnam, 1969-1973 The Limits of American Power Campaign ads, 1968 The Living Room Candidate - Commercials - 1968 - The First Civil Right Nixon – “a secret plan to end the war” An “honorable peace” Uniting the Nation Law and Order Broader Themes of the Nixon Years 1.) Transformation of the Cold War/ Ending the First Cold War? 2.) Loss of American Global Dominance – Politically, Economically, Militarily – Perceptions of American Decline 3.) Domestic Crisis of Legitimacy – Protests at Home, Watergate, Congress and the end of the Imperial Presidency 4.) New Centers of Power – Europe and Japan 5.) Soviet Expansionism – Successes in the Third World Richard Nixon Pre-Presidential Career 1.) Born in Yorba Linda, California, January 9, 1913 – Quaker parents 2.) Educated at Whittier College and Duke Law School – served in the Navy during World War II 3.) Elected to Congress in November 1946 – strong anti- communist platform 4.) Elected to Senate in 1950 – defeated Helen Gahagan Douglas 5.) Nominated for Vice president in 1952 – survived scandal with “Checkers speech” 6.) Active Vice President – widely traveled; Kitchen debate with Khrushchev, mob attack in Venezuela Career in the 1960s • 7.) Narrow loss to Kennedy in 1960 – 0.3% difference in popular vote • 8.) Lost Governor’s race in California in 1962 – anger at the media - You won’t have Nixon to kick around any more.” • 9.) Rehabilitation efforts 1962-1968 – endless campaigning; support for the war but criticism of tactics Nixon and Kissinger Kissinger’s Background
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and Sources for Evil Geniuses: the Unmaking of America: a Recent History
    Notes and Sources for Evil Geniuses: The Unmaking of America: A Recent History Introduction xiv “If infectious greed is the virus” Kurt Andersen, “City of Schemes,” The New York Times, Oct. 6, 2002. xvi “run of pedal-to-the-medal hypercapitalism” Kurt Andersen, “American Roulette,” New York, December 22, 2006. xx “People of the same trade” Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, ed. Andrew Skinner, 1776 (London: Penguin, 1999) Book I, Chapter X. Chapter 1 4 “The discovery of America offered” Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy In America, trans. Arthur Goldhammer (New York: Library of America, 2012), Book One, Introductory Chapter. 4 “A new science of politics” Tocqueville, Democracy In America, Book One, Introductory Chapter. 4 “The inhabitants of the United States” Tocqueville, Democracy In America, Book One, Chapter XVIII. 5 “there was virtually no economic growth” Robert J Gordon. “Is US economic growth over? Faltering innovation confronts the six headwinds.” Policy Insight No. 63. Centre for Economic Policy Research, September, 2012. --Thomas Piketty, “World Growth from the Antiquity (growth rate per period),” Quandl. 6 each citizen’s share of the economy Richard H. Steckel, “A History of the Standard of Living in the United States,” in EH.net (Economic History Association, 2020). --Andrew McAfee and Erik Brynjolfsson, The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies (New York: W.W. Norton, 2016), p. 98. 6 “Constant revolutionizing of production” Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx, Manifesto of the Communist Party (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1969), Chapter I. 7 from the early 1840s to 1860 Tomas Nonnenmacher, “History of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pulitzer Prizes 2020 Winne
    WINNERS AND FINALISTS 1917 TO PRESENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Excerpts from the Plan of Award ..............................................................2 PULITZER PRIZES IN JOURNALISM Public Service ...........................................................................................6 Reporting ...............................................................................................24 Local Reporting .....................................................................................27 Local Reporting, Edition Time ..............................................................32 Local General or Spot News Reporting ..................................................33 General News Reporting ........................................................................36 Spot News Reporting ............................................................................38 Breaking News Reporting .....................................................................39 Local Reporting, No Edition Time .......................................................45 Local Investigative or Specialized Reporting .........................................47 Investigative Reporting ..........................................................................50 Explanatory Journalism .........................................................................61 Explanatory Reporting ...........................................................................64 Specialized Reporting .............................................................................70
    [Show full text]