THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Thesis/Dissertation Sheet

Surname or Family name: MOBBS

First name: RALPH Other name/s: JASPER

Abbreviation for degree: MASTER OF SURGERY

School: ANATOMY Faculty: SURGERY

Title: Peripheral Endoscopy: a cadaveric study.

Peripheral nerve problems are common and encompass a wide ~pectrum of diseases, traumatic injuries and mass lesions. There have been few major technical advances in peripheral nerve surgery over the last three decades with exception of endoscopic carpal tunnel release, intraoperative nerve action potential recording and nerve grafting. Certain in the upper and lower extremities are vulnerable to entrapment at specific anatomic locations by virtue of th ere being superficial, fixed in position, or coursing across a joint. Peripheral nerve surgeons often encounter patients who suffer fr :>m these entrapment syndromes, the most common being carpal tunnel syndrome, for which endoscopic techniques have been d;scussed in the Iiterature since the early 1980' s. Otherwise there have been few reports in the literature that discuss the utility of endoscopic surgery for the treatment of peripheral nerve problems. Endoscopy has however been alluded to as a possible future less invasive technique for the exploration and treatment of nerve pathologies.

The aim of this cadaveric study is to illustrate that using standard equipment available in most hospitals, and using principles of subcutaneous fascial dissection and expansion, that a select range of peripheral nerve problems can be dealt with using endoscopy. A study using both embalmed cadaveric specimens and fresh cadavers v.as used to evaluate potential endoscopic techniques. A set of rules was developed to decide if a nerve exposure was possible. '\Jerve pathology must be in expandable and "safe" planes. A safe plane is a plane that can be expanded using techniques described where there is little chance of damaging adjacent neurovascular structures. Nerves that are applicable to the technique include those that: can be reliably located via a minimal incision, the nerve trunk lies in an expandable and safe plane and are of a suitable dian1eter.

To develop the techniques to a suitable technical level may be ifficult with inadequate patient turnover. Also, the time and additional risk may sway the decision making for a surgeon to initially attempt these techniques. For the surgeon who develops a busy peripheral nerve practice and who is willing to learn these techniques, they may have a limited role for patients who request a more limited/ minimall y invasive approach to their peripheral nerve problem.

I hereby grant to the University of New South Wales or its agents the right to archive and to make available my thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in the University libraries in all forms of media, now or here after known, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. I retain all property rights, such as patent rights. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation.

I also authorise University Microfilms to use the 350 word abstract of my thesis in Dissertation Abstracts International (this is applicable to doctoral theses only) . .------,

Signature Witness Date

The University recognises that may be exceptional circumstances requiring restrictions on copying or conditions on use. Requests for restriction for a period cf up to 2 years must be made in writing to the Registrar. Requests for a longer period of restriction may be considered in exceptional circumstances if accompanied by a lette r of support from the Supervisor or Head of School. Such requests must be submitted with the thesis/dissertation.

~e of completion of requirements for ward:

THIS SHEET IS TO BE GLUED TO THE INSIDE FRONT COVER OF THE THESIS

ORIGINALITY STATEMENT

'I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge it contains no materials previously published or written by another person, or substantial proportions of material which have been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis. Any contribution made to the research by others, with whom I have worked at UNSW or elsewhere, is explicitly acknowledged in the thesis. I also declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work, except to the extent that assistance from others in the project's design and conception or in style, presentation and linguistic expression is acknowled11ed.' Peripheral Nerve Endoscopy:

a cadaveric study

Ralph Mobbs

A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the

requirements

for the degree of Master of Surgery

Faculty of

University of New South Wales

March 2004 •:""" , : ._,.. \''iJ r . 1 6 AU3 20G5 Field ofvie'll Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs _.._-,------~~~- ~:J Distal end Abstract

Peripheral nerve problems are common and encompass a wide spectrum of diseases, traumatic injuries and mass lesions. There have been fewmajortechnical advances in peripheral nerve surgery over the last three decades with exception of endoscopic carpal tunnel release, intraoperative nerve action potential recording and nerve

grafting. Certain nerves in the upper and lower extremities are vulnerable to entrapment at specific anatomic locations by virtue of there being superficial, fixed in

position, or coursing across a joint. Peripheral nerve surgeons often encounter patients who suffer from these entrapment syndromes, the most common being carpal tunnel syndrome, for which endoscopic techniques have been discussed in the

literature since the early 1980's. Otherwise there have been few reports in the

literature that discuss the utility of endoscopic surgery for the treatment of peripheral

nerve problems. Endoscopy has however been alluded to as a possible future less

invasive technique for the exploration and treatment of nerve pathologies.

Endoscopic surgery along subcutaneous and facial planes is not a new concept.

Balloon dissectors have been used to create an optical cavity by separating fascial

layers of a constant anatomic plane. This cavity can be maintained with either carbon

dioxide insufflation or manual retraction. These fascial planes can be accessed

quickly to facilitate endoscopic procedures such as bone grafting, mastectomy,

cosmetic procedures and tissue expansion for reconstructive surgery to name a few.

Although there have been few reports of endoscopic techniques for peripheral nerve

surgery, no attempt has been made to defme rules for or against an approach. The

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Abstract · Page ii Field of vir:II Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs " Angl~: of view

._____ =----'---' Axis._j . Di5t:al ~:nd research hypothesis of this cadaveric study is that using standard equipment available in most hospitals, and using principles of subcutaneous fascial dissection and expansion, that a select range of peripheral nerve problems can be dealt with using endoscopy.

A study using both embalmed cadaveric specimens and fresh cadavers was used to evaluate potential endoscopic techniques. From 15 potential cadavers, 12 were suitable for examination of these techniques. A set of rules was developed to decide if a nerve exposure was possible. Nerve pathology must be in expandable and "safe" planes. A safe plane is a plane that can be expanded using techniques described where there is little chance of damaging adjacent neurovascular structures. Example of a dangerous plane would include the endoscopic evaluation of the posterior

interosseous nerve. Along its path proximal to the arcade ofFrosche, many nerves

and vessels cross its path superficially and these would be at risk in this exposure.

Therefore, nerves that are applicable to the technique include those that: can be

reliably located via a minimal incision, the nerve trunk lies in an expandable and safe

plane and are of a suitable diameter.

To develop the techniques to a suitable technical level may be difficult with

inadequate patient turnover. Also, the time and additional risk may sway the decision

making for a surgeon to initially attempt these techniques. For these reasons, I cannot

see wide acceptance ofthe techniques detailed here. However, for the surgeon who

develops a busy peripheral nerve practice and who is willing to learn these techniques,

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Abstract Page iii FleiG! of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Drstalend they may have a limited role for patients who request a more limited/ minimally invasive approach to their peripheral nerve problem.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Abstract Page iv Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs ..., Angle" ofvie-.v ====:-====--l~i:J Distalent:l Acknowledgements

I am very grateful to Dr Bartek Szandera and Marcus Cremorsce for excellent assistance with schematic illustrations and the Medical Illustration Unit at the Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick. Line illustration production was also performed at

Medici Graphics, St Vincents Hospital, Sydney.

I thank Dr Charles Teo and the instrument company M.Stenning Australia for providing endoscopic and general theatre equipment that was used to establish an operating theatre environment in the morgue at the University ofNew South Wales.

This work was generously supported by a foundation scholarship from the Royal

Australasian College of Surgeons. Thank you to my supervisors Dr Peter Blum who initiated my interest in peripheral nerve surgery and Dr Dzung Vu who has a sincere interest in teaching and a passion for anatomy that is rarely seen.

Thanks to family and friends who have helped out during the production of this thesis.

Finally, a special thanks to Lisa, Redmond, Clementine and my parents Drs Gale and

Tony Mobbs.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Acknowledgements Pagev Flelel of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy .; Dr Ralph Mobbs ..., Angle ofvii:'N ----~ ;___;~~~~J Distal end Table of Contents

Abstract...... ii Acknowledgements ...... v Table of Contents ...... vi Table of Figures ...... ix Chapter 1: Introduction...... 1 Evolution ofNeuroendoscopy ...... 3 Equipment for neuroendoscopy ...... 8 Surgical methods to view anatomy ...... l6 Chapter 2: Equipment and new instrumentation ...... 19 Aims for instrumentation ...... 20 Equipment for this project ...... 21 Balloons used for dissections ...... 22 New Instrumentation ...... 23 Chapter 3: Technical considerations...... 26 Develop a plane of dissection ...... 28 Maintain the plane of dissection...... 29 Endoscopy ...... 31 Visualization/ inspection within the plane: discussion ...... 32 Chapter 4: Sciatic nerve endoscopy ...... 34 Surgical objectives ...... 36 Cadaveric Approach ...... 3 7 Technical Report ...... 40 Discussion ...... 4 7 Chapter 5: Suprascapular nerve endoscopy ...... 49 Technical Report ...... , ...... 51 Methods ...... 53 Operative technique ...... 54 Discussion...... 62

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Table of Contents Page vi Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs ..... Angle of vle-.v ..____ _-~ '--_!~i:J Di5tal end Chapter 6: Ulnar nerve endoscopy •••...•...... ••••...••••...... •••••.....•...... •.• 64 Single Portal Exposure ...... 66 Methods ...... :...... 66 Discussion ...... 69 Chapter 7: Sural nerve harvest via endoscopy...... •••...... •••••.....•.•••...... 70 Surgical anatomy ...... 71 Advantages of Technique ...... 72 Surgical approach ...... 74 Chapter 8: Tarsal tunnel endoscopy ..•••..••••...... ••••...... •••.....•....••.....••••...... ••..•..• 78 Tarsal tunnel syndrome ...... 80 Operative Technique ...... 81 Chapter 9: Other nerves attempted ...... 84 Median nerve ...... 85 Brachial plexus ...... 86 Posterior Interroseous Nerve ...... 87 Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve ...... 89 Peroneal ...... 95 Chapter 10: Feasibility ofthe minimally invasive technique ••....•••.•...•.••...... •••.• 96 Inspection of anatomy on predissected cadavers ...... 98 Attempting exposures on the fresh cadaver...... 101 Rules for suitability ...... 101 Chapter 11: Analysis of Clinical Application ...... •••...... •...... •.•...•••••....•...•••.. 103 What are the potential advantages of the technique? ...... 104 What are the disadvantages ofthe technique? ...... 104 What pathologies are suitable for the technique? ...... 105 Who should perform peripheral nerve endoscopy? ...... 105 Chapter 12: Conclusion ...... 106 Conclusion ...... 1 07 Where to from here? ...... 1 07 Will this change the future of peripheral nerve surgery? ...... 1 07

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Table of Contents Page vii Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy "' Dr Ralph Mobbs ..... Angle of vle-.v

------~-~,~=-LAxis '1 -----=-J Distal end Appendix ...... 108 Presentation at meetings ...... 108 Video footage on CD-ROM ...... ! 08 References ...... 109

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Table ofFigures Page viii Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs ' Ang lr: bf vie-.v ~-­"'------Distal end Table of Figures

Figure 1.1: Single portal endoscopic procedure (a) ...... 4

Figure 1.2: Single portal endoscopic procedure (b) ...... 5

Figure 1.3: Single portal endoscopic procedure (c) ...... 5

Figure 1.4: Single portal endoscopic procedure (d) ...... 5

Figure 1.5: Single portal endoscopic procedure (e) ...... 6

Figure 1.6: Single portal endoscopic procedure (f) ...... 6

Figure 1.7: Single portal endoscopic procedure (g) ...... 6

Figure 1.8: Surgical Setup ...... 7

Figure 1.9: Interoperative picture ...... 7

Figure 1.10: Rigid endoscope...... 10

Figure 1.11: Pen scope ...... 11

Figure 1.12: Light source ...... l2

Figure 1.13: Video printer...... 12

Figure 1.14: Television ...... 13

Figure 1.15: Video recorder ...... l4

Figure 1.16: Advantages and disadvantages of the four viewing methods ...... 17

Figure 1.17: Loupe magnification- Designs for vision: x2.5 with headlight ...... 18

Figure 1.18: Microscope- Carl Ziess v OPMI ...... l8

Figure 1.19: Endoscope-Karl Storz, 0 and 30 degree ...... 18

Figure 2.1: Endoscopic setup in the morgue at University ofNew South Wales ...... 21

Figure 2.2: Expanding planes along the ulnar nerve ...... 22

Figure 2.3: Preperitoneal structural balloon ...... 23

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Table ofFigures Pageix fill!.:! of v1r.w Peripheral nerve endoscopy ,; Dr Ralph Mobbs ..;,. Anglll Of vl~JW

--.----~61 ~-.._·----- ~ .. ______j Distalllnt:l Figure 2.4: Dual-Dissector instrument for endoscopic nerve surgery ...... 24

Figure 2.5: Proposed balloon that expands laterally to avoid damage ...... 25

Figure 3.1: Developing a plane of dissection ...... 28

Figure 3.2: Lateral dissecting balloons to dissect along subcutaneous planes ...... 28

Figure 3.3: Maintain the plane of dissection (a) ...... 29

Figure 3.4: Maintain the plane of dissection (b) ...... 29

Figure 3.5: Maintain the plane of dissection (c) ...... 30

Figure 3.6: Maintain the plane of dissection (d) ...... 30

Figure 3.7: Endoscopy (a) ..... :...... 31

Figure 3.8: Endoscopy (b) ...... 31

Figure 3.9: Endoscopy (c) ...... 31

Figure 4.1: Piriformis and the sciatic nerve emerging from its inferior angles ...... 38

Figure 4.2: View ofthe inferior gluteal neurovascular bundle ...... 38

Figure 4.3: Variation of the sciatic nerve ...... 39

Figure 4.4: Sciatic nerve lesion ...... 41

Figure 4.5: Incision lengthened at either pole to provide greater exposure ...... 42

Figure 4.6: Create the necessary working space ...... 43

Figure 4.7: The proximal segment of the sciatic nerve ...... 44

Figure 4.8: The sciatic nerve on view at the base of the exposure ...... 45

Figure 4.9: A distal view of the sciatic nerve ...... 46

Figure 5.1: Incision on cadaver ...... 55

Figure 5.2: Expanded endoscopic view of operative region ...... 56

Figure 5.3: Corresponding endoscopic view ofFigure 5.2...... 57

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Table ofFigures Pagex Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy "' Dr Ralph Mobbs -.. Angle ofvi~.v ------~---~=i Di5tal encl Figure 5.4: Division of the ligament with a micro scissor ...... 58

Figure 5.5: The divided ligament ...... 59

Figure 5.6: Where to cut the transverse scapular ligament ...... 60

Figure 5.7: Before more detailed dissection ...... 61

Figure 6.1: Exposure of the ulnar nerve at the elbow ...... 68

Figure 7.1: Sequence of sural graft harvest ...... 73

Figure 7.2: Incision posterior to the lateral malleolus and the sural nerve ...... 75

Figure 7.3: After the nerve dissection ...... 76

Figure 7.4: Four incisions extending from the ankle to the political fossa ...... 77

Figure 8.1: Endoscopic decompression of the tarsal tunnel: right foot ...... 81

Figure 8.2: Prosected specimen demonstrating the path of the posterior tibial nerve. 83

Figure 9.1: Proximal forearm, right side. Path ofPIN nerve ...... 88

Figure 9.2: Note the LFCN piercing the "leaves" of the inguinal ligament ...... 93

Figure 10.1: Median nerve at the elbow ...... 98

Figure 10.2: Suprascapular nerve at the suprascapular notch ...... 98

Figure 10.3: Gluteal specimen demonstrating piriformis muscle and sciatic nerve .... 99

Figure 10.4: Ulnar nerve at the elbow ...... 99

Figure 10.5: Radial, PIN and SSRN nerves ...... 100

Figure 10.6: List of nerve dissections attempted on the fresh cadaver ...... 102

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Table ofFigures Page xi Field ofvie-N Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs . -.. Angle of view ------~-~-~J::Axi~j Di5taltmcl Chapter 1: Introduction.

Outline of chapter:

El Evolution of neuroendoscopy.

El Equipment for neuroendoscopy. o Methods to view anatomy.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 1: Introduction. Page 1 Field of vit'N Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs " Angle of vle:w ~-~----• -=-~J~:j Di5tale:na Neuroendoscopy has developed into its own subspecialty in Neurosurgery over the last 10-15 years though the works of Hopf, 1 Pemesky, 1 Jones? Teo, 3 Fukushima,4

Jho5 and many others. The general goals of neuroendoscopy are to treat diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system with minimal trauma to normal tissues and planes of dissection and therefore reduce postoperative pain, scaring, morbidity and hospital stay. The delay in development of the technique was more a reflection on the technological limitations rather than interest. Endoscopy is now commonplace in the neurosurgeons armourmanterium for intracranial and spinal pathologies.

Surgery on the peripheral nervous system using the endoscopic technique has been largely overlooked except for a few procedures such as endoscopic carpal tunnel release and thoracoscopic sympathectomy.

The research hypothesis of this cadaveric study is that, by usage of standard equipment available in most hospitals, and using principles of subcutaneous fascial dissection and expansion, a select range of peripheral nerve problems can be dealt with using endoscopy.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 1: Introduction. Page2 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs "'Angleofvlcw

Di5tal eru:l Evolution of N euroendoscopy

The urologist L'Espinasse performed the first endoscopic procedure on the brain in

6 1910 • He placed a rigid endoscope into the dilated ventricular system of a hydrocephalic patient and attempted to remove the choroid plexus. Unfortunately the patient died soon after the procedure. The famous neurosurgeon Walter Dandy

7 performed a similar procedure on four infants of which one survived •

The technique did not develop for many decades due to the lack of suitable equipment available for safe navigation through the ventricular system. During the 1970's there were several major advancements to the technique. Griffith and Hopkins designed the first endoscope dedicated to neurosurgery and published on the definitive treatment of

8 hydrocephalus by choroid plexectomy • Fukushima attempted intraventricular biopsy

9 10 and endoscopic surgery of the subarachnoid space • • Although the concept of third

11 ventriculostomy was advocated in 1935 by Scarff , the procedure was popularized

12 by Vries in the 1970's • With the evolution of improved technology, intracranial endoscopy has become a mainstay of treatment of hydrocephalus and an important adjunct to treatment of tumours13 and vascular lesions to name a few indications.

Once a tumour is removed, the surgeon can use the endoscope to assess the degree of resection. Often, the same surgery can be carried out through a smaller craniotomy by using the endoscope, in keeping with the concept of minimally invasive, yet maximally effective surgery. 14

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 1: Introduction. Page3 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Di5tal ent.l Spinal endoscopy has received an ever-increasing presence in the scientific literature

15 with its genesis in the treatment oflumbar spine disc herniation • Endoscopic spinal techniques have the advantage of reducing the "approach-related trauma" that is problematic with spinal surgery. The indications have rapidly evolved to include both posterior and anterior approaches to the spine at all levels. Degenerative spinal disease and disc herniation are not the only pathologies treated with endoscopy with

16 malignant cord compression benefiting from endoscopic techniques •

Decompression of the cranio-cervical junction for a type 1 Chiari malformation has

17 also been attempted endoscopically •

Endoscopic carpal tunnel release is one of the few applications of endoscopic technology to surgery ofthe peripheral nervous system. Carpal tunnel syndrome was a term first used in the 1930' s to describe an entrapment neuropathy of the median nerve at the wrist. The first open carpal tunnel release was described in 194 7 with little change in the technique for 50 years until the advent ofthe endoscopic procedure

18 19 in 1990 • A summary of a single portal endoscopic procedure is included here

(Figures 1.1 - 1. 7):

Figure 1.1: Single portal endoscopic

procedure (a)

The single portal technique starts with a

small transverse incision proximal to the

palmer crease.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 1: Introduction. Page4 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs Angle 'of view

"::::::===~=- L..4.xl5 D i ~ l end Figure 1.2: Single portal endoscopic

procedure (b)

When the surgeon is confident that

instruments can be placed into the carpal

tunnel, a cannula (open on one side) is

placed into the carpal tunnel.

Figure 1.3: Single portal endoscopic

procedure {c)

The endoscope is placed into the cannula

to look at the undersurface of the

Transverse Carpal Ligament- to make

sure that nerves and arteries are safely out

of the way.

Figure 1.4: Single portal endoscopic

procedure (d)

Through the cannula a special knife is

inserted. This knife has a hook on the

end that cuts backwards as the knife is

pu lied back out of the cannula.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter I: Introduction. PageS Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Di5taleM Figure 1.5: Single portal endoscopic

procedure (e)

The slot in the cannula allows the hook to

cut only in the direction the slot is facing.

The nerves in the carpal tunnel are

protected by the tube.

Figure 1.6: Single portal endoscopic

procedure (f)

Once the knife is pulled all the way back,

the Transverse Carpal Ligament is

divided - without making an incision in

the palmar skin.

Figure 1.7: Single portal endoscopic

procedure (g)

Intraoperative picture of endoscopic

carpal tunnel release.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Page6 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs l Di5tal end Figure 1.8: Surgical Setup

Intraoperative setup for thoracoscopic

sympathectomy.

Advances in minimally invasive endoscopic techniques with significantly reduced morbidity and mortality rates has established thoracoscopic sympathectomy as a safe and effective treatment for palmer hyperhidrosis. The technique has its origins in the

20 1970's , and is now considered a standard procedure for this indication. High technical success and patient satisfaction rates have paralleled the increased

21 application of this procedure in the treatment of palmer hyperhidrosis • Although predominantly the domain of thoracic surgeons as the procedure involves thoracoscopy neurosurgeons are usually involved in the dissection and division of the sympathetic chain. Figure 1.8 summarizes the surgical setup for the procedure and

Figure 1.9 an intraoperative picture.

Figure 1.9: Interoperative picture

Intraoperative view of thoracic cavity

prior to sympathectomy.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Page7 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy ; Dr Ralph Mobbs . "'.Anglel:lfview ------~----=~~j Distal en.:! Equipment for neuroendoscopy

22 The focus for any surgeon is on the procedure rather than the equipment • The focus for the procedure begins with understanding the anatomy, and to appreciate the anatomy a clear view is essential. Thus the limitation for the endoscopic surgeon is not only the experience ofthe surgeon, but also his/her tools. Poor instrumentation will lead to poor visualization, which will lead to poor appreciation of the anatomy, which will ultimately lead to complications. Various studies have warned of the

23 dangers ofneuroendoscopy , so to minimize complications the neuroendoscopist must be well trained, understand the "chain" of equipment and have adequate resources backup support.

The medium and viewing cavity.

Although clear CSF and Ringer's irrigation is the ideal working medium for intraventricular surgery, no fluid is best for surgery involving other body cavities such as the thoracic and peritoneal cavity. Intermittent irrigation and suction is usually helpful to maintain a clear view while in other cavities such as the subarachnoid space, where blood products may contaminate the endoscope lens.

The viewing cavity may already be in existence such as ventricles of the brain, or be a potential space that can be enlarged with irrigation or insufflation. Other cavities may be created with the gradual removal or retraction of normal or pathological tissues.

For instance, with the removal of disc material during a percutaneous discectomy, the surgeons' working cavity is gradually enlarged as more disc material is removed.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Page 8 .- Field of v1~w Peripheral nerve endoscopy .. Dr Ralph Mobbs ..... Anale: ofvle".v ----~~~~~L~I:j

Distal en~ Rigid endoscopes.

The rigid endoscope with glass optics offers a superior view of the operative field with the benefit of additional channels to operate additional instruments. Rigid endoscope design includes (Figure 1.1 0):

1. Proximal end interface point with the eye or video equipment.

2. Distal end furthest point from the proximal end or users eye.

3. Insertion diameter- the diameter quoted as the actual diameter inserted into

the anatomy of an endoscope sheath.

4. Instrument axis- the axis of the instrument relative to the instrument axis.

5. Optical axis- the axis of the optical path which is displaced to the instrument

axis.

6. Angle of view- the angular value of displacement to the optical axis.

7. Optical field of view- the area which the conical system covers is as a cone.

8. Fibre illumination - the area which the fiber illumination covers as a cone and

is greater than the optical field ofview.

9. Working length- the actual length embodying the insertion diameter, which

can be applied.

10. Light post input - point ofthe illumination when connected to a light guide

and source.

11. Eye shield - used as a cup for the eye or a diameter for the attachment of video

camera equipment.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Page9 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Dl5tal end

,. 6 - 8 7 5 - . '

0 9

Axts o set

10

Figure 1.10: Rigid endoscope.

Flexible Endoscopes.

The advantages of the flexible endoscope include movement and navigation in body cavities that is not possible with the rigid endoscope. Disadvantages include the reduced optical resolution, with most scopes providing 10,000 pixels up to 30,000.

Also for the novice endoscopist, the difficulty to maintain orientation during a procedure remains a challenge.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Page 10 Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr RaJph Mobbs

Oi!ital end Pen scopes

The pen scope is Iigbtweight and easy to use. Shown here (Figure 1.11) is a Murphy

Scope - an endoscope designed specifically for visualization of small and difficult-to- access surgical compartments. It is a single-use, disposable product minimizes the risk of cross contamination and simplifies set-up time. The endoscope tip includes a non-traumatic rounded end to minimize trauma to surrounding tissue. The endoscopes are designed with 10,000 pixel fibers for a high-resolution image. The malleable tip of the bayonet and curved models can be reshaped per the surgeon's preference. An irrigation channel is included to maintain a clear field of view.

Figure 1.11 : Pen scope

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Page 11 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs "' I Angle kf view Dl5tal end Light source

A xenon light source (Figure 1.12) provides superior brightness, which is important as this affects the picture quality. Most units have an automatic iris that reduces output when the scope gets close to an object to minimise potential glare.

Figure 1.12: Light source

Video printer

Pictured is a Sony Colour Video Printer- Figure 1.13. They are full-featured small format printers designed for medical and scientific applications. They provide high- resolution prints in seconds and are ideal for image creation, patient record files and patient referring copies. High quality performance is possible from almost any standard video signal.

Figure 1.13: Video printer

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Page 12 Field ofvlew Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs Angle of view I Lllxi!i Distal end

Monitor

Designed specifically for use in medical applications, monitors must provide exceptional clarity and colour fidelity required for endoscopy, ultrasound, surgical and laboratory microscopy. Pictured is a medical monitor that offers a High

Resolution picture tube, in addition to compatibility with NTSC and PAL colour systems (Figure 1.14). The design incorporates knob controls, splash guards and on- screen menus and provides flexibility and easier access to monitor setup.

Figure 1.14: Television

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Page 13 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

D15t.al end Video recorder

The video recorder should be designed for medical applications with digital frame memory that provides a noiseless crystal clear "freeze" and fully compatibility with other S-VHS (or VHS) tape recordings (Figure 1.15). A compact design and optional control via RS-232C or 34-pin interface should provide convenient integration with ultrasound, endoscopy and pathology systems.

Figure 1.15: Video recorder

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Page 14 .-Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy ; Dr Ralph Mobbs ..., Angle of view ~:=====··:::·-::_-~-'-~Coc th<1:J Distal end

Equipment in Development

There are a variety of new instruments to assist the endoscopic surgeon. An endoscopic positioning stand that takes weight off a surgeon's hand, reduces operating room crowding, gives more precise control, and allows position locking is being trailed. Often when performing endoscopic surgery, the surgeon must maintain very demanding postures while holding various tools and graspers. The prototype passive assistive mechanism ("SFU Laparoscopic Stand") offers the surgeon a fixed structure for manipulating and holding tools in any desired configuration.

Stereotactic guidance systems for endoscopic surgeons are already in use that combines precise tool-position information from sensors. Developments in both flexible and rigid endoscopy have centred around reducing the diameter ofthe part of the endoscope that is inserted into the operative cavity. With flexible endoscopes, applications are being pursued to image the interiors of arteries for visualizing potential targets for laser angioplasty. Gradient-index objective lenses with diameters down to 0.25 mm are commercially available for these applications.

Larger diameter flexible fibre endoscopes are being replaced by solid-state video devices, which can provide excellent resolution in the same package size. These video chips provide colour imaging and can be made arbitrarily long. Ifthese video devices can be reduced in size to less than 3 mm, they could even be used in place of some rigid endoscope relay lens systems.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Page 15 Field of vie-.v Peripheral nerve endoscopy .. Dr Ralph Mobbs "" Angle of vi eoN .----~ --~ _J~i:j Distal end Surgical methods to view anatomy

Although anatomy does not change, the technique by which you view anatomy does

and this may provide alternative information from which the surgeon may alter his/her

approach to a procedure. The surgeon has at their disposal essentially four methods to

view anatomy (Figures 1.17-1.19):

i. Naked eye.

ii. Loupe magnification (x2.0 to x5.5)

iii. Operating microscope.

1v. Endoscope (0, 30 and 70 degree).

24 Surgeons have long recognized the value of magnification and illumination •

Neurosurgery was revolutionised with the introduction of the operating microscope by

Yasargil.25 With the superior magnification of deep structures, the indications for

neurosurgery were broadened and the specialty became safer. Many authors state the

introduction of the endoscope will have a similar effect in the specialty of

neurosurgery.

The author conducted a study of 17 surgeons who use Ioupe magnification,

microscope and endoscopy to review the potential benefits of the microscope and

26 endoscope as compared with Ioupe magnification and naked eye vision • The

superior illumination and variable magnification ofthe endoscope and microscope

was seen as a major benefit. As a teaching tool, the ~icroscope was seen as

considerable benefit over loupes and the endoscope was again seen as a benefit over

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Page 16 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy ~ Dr Ralph Mobbs ...., .Angle: bfvlew "'-·------· ~----"''--~~j Di5tale:nd the microscope as the assistant is involved in the procedure to either manipulate the endoscope or endoscopic instruments. See Figure 1.16 to summarize the advantages and disadvantages of the four viewing methods.

Figure 1.16: Advantages and disadvantages of the four viewing methods

Naked eye Loupes Microscope Endoscope Magnification Nil Fixed Variable Variable Illumination Nil+/- head Nil+/- head Superior Superior lamp lamp Incision Big patient= Big patient= Optics Potentially big incision. big incision. determine size minimal of incision incision Surgeon neck Yes Yes Reduced Minimal fatigue Look "around No No No Yes (30 and 70 corners" degree scope) Teaching Assistant Assistant Assistant Assistant excluded excluded included integral to procedure Infection risk Increased with Increased with Potentially Reduced due to larger incision surgeons reduced limited incision bumping heads. and minimal tissue trauma. Cost Nil Minimal Moderate Moderate Time to setup Nil Minimal Moderate Moderate

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Page 17 1 Field ofvlew Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Figure 1.17: Loupe magnification- Designs for vision: x2.5 with headlight

Figure 1.18: Microscope- Carl Ziess v OPMI

Figure 1.19: Endoscope- Karl Storz. 0 and 30 degree

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Page 18 Field ofvl~.v Peripheral nerve endoscopy ; Dr Ralph Mobbs .... Angleafv1e.v <------'---c;=-=--'''--'-~i:J Distal end Chapter 2: Equipment and new instrumentation

Outline of chapter:

o Aims for instrumentation.

o Equipment for this project.

o Balloons used for dissection.

o New instrumentation.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 2: Equipment and new instrumentation Page 19 Field ofvie-.v Peripheral nerve endoscopy , Dr Ralph Mobbs ~ Analeofvlew "'-..______----=-l~i:J Distalel1d As carpenters rely on their tools, so do surgeons rely on their instruments. Evolution of neurosurgery as a specialty in the last 50 years can be partly attributed to advancements in magnification and illumination. Pioneers such as Y asargil during the 1970's further refined the surgical adjuncts available with advances such as a

balanced microscope stand, mouthpiece and hand controls. Along with naked eye

vision, the modalities for illumination and magnification at the neurosurgeons

disposal now include the Ioupe/ headlight combination, the microscope and the

endoscope. Combinations of these tools have been reported and their combined use

will likely increase in the future. With new operative techniques, it follows that new

instrumentation will be necessary to aid the proposed technical advances. New

instrumentation will either help with the initial exposure or dissection during the

operation.27

Aims for instrumentation

1. Development of instruments that reduce the number oftimes that instruments

change hands between the surgeon and scrub nurse. Advantages include

minimization oftime as considerable time is lost with slow or inaccurate

instrument transfer in the OR and reduction of infection as increased

instrument handling increases infection.

2. Develop tools that aid in the initial exposure of the operative field in a safe

and technically easy manner.

3. Minimize the time a surgeon has to remove his/her vision from the video

screen28 and thus time reduction with refocus on the screen and insertion of

new instruments.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 2: Equipment and new instrumentation Page 20 Field of vfew Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Di5tal end Equipment for this project

Laboratory

The cadaveric work was perfonned in the mortuary located at the University ofNew

South Wales, School of Anatomy (Figure 2.1). The fresh cadavers were paid for by a grant from the Royal Australian College of Surgeons.

Figure 2.1: Endoscopic setup in the morgue at University ofNew South Wales

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 2: Equipment and new instrumentation Page 21 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs Angle of view r .Axie

Dl5tal end Endoscopic equipment

Endoscopes, light source, leads and video camera equipment was provided by

N.Stenning Australia (174 Parramatta Rd Camperdown, Australia) and Dr C. Teo

(Director Centre for Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery Randwick, Australia).

Balloons used for dissections.

1. Standard catheter balloons were used for subcutaneous tissue expansion as

they are cheap and easy to use (Figure 2.2). A standard 5cc urine catheter

used to expand planes along the ulnar nerve.

Figure 2.2: Expanding planes along the ulnar nerve

2. Structural balloons (Figure 2.3) used for abdominal surgery were initially tried

however damage to neurovascular structures with the initial insertion rendered

the use of this device as unsafe and was discontinued early in the study.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 2: Equipment and new instrumentation Page 22 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Di5talend

Figure 2.3: Preperitoneal structural balloon

New Instrumentation

Dissector I Hook

The role of a blunt nerve hook in peripheral nerve surgery (PNS) is indispensable.

The addition of a blunt dissector at one pole of an instrument and a blunt nerve hook at the other pole is a valuable addition that gives the operating endoscopic surgeon additional dissecting power without the change of instruments.

Dual Blunt Dissector I Sharp Dissector

The "Dual-Dissector' :

If the surgeon can blunt dissect in one direction (say distal to the operator), then sharp dissect in the reverse direction (say towards the operator), this will be a major advantage in PNS as entrapment neuropathies usually require the blunt dissection of the pathology prior to division ofthe constricting band or point of entrapment (Figure

2.4).

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 2: Equipment and new instrumentation Page 23 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs Angle of view I "& .1 Di§tal cnd

dissector

Figure 2.4: Dual-Dissector instrument for endoscopic nerve surgery

Enables the surgeon to blunt dissect away from the endoscope and sharp dissect towards the instrument. Designed by Dr RJ Mobbs, made by Eve instrument makers,

Randwick, Australia.

Structural Balloon

A standard structural dissecting balloon will expand in all planes. A pre peritoneal balloon will expand in a longitudinal plane to develop the pre peritoneal plane. These balloons have been used in a variety of subcutaneous tissue expansion studies (plastic/ axillary space dissection).29

The goal of a structural balloon for EPNS (endoscopic peripheral nerve surgery) is to develop a plane while limiting the pressure exerted on the nerve.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 2: Equipment and new instrumentation Page 24 Fle!el ofvie·.v Peripheral nerve endoscopy "' Dr Ralph Mobbs ""' A11gle afvlew

'--'"'------~~ c- cc._!_~~ Distalenel I propose a new type of balloon (Figure 2.5) that will inflate sideways, so that minimal pressure is exerted on the nerve.

Figure 2.5: Proposed balloon that expands laterally to avoid damage

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 2: Equipment and new instrumentation Page 25 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Di5tal end Chapter 3: Technical considerations.

Outline of chapter:

E7 Develop a plane of dissection.

E7 Maintain the plane of dissection.

E7 Visualization/ inspection within the plane: discussion.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 3: Technical considerations. Page26 Field of vit:'N Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs " Arrgle ofvlew

Di5talencl If initial consideration of anatomy on the prosected specimen deems a nerve suitable for the endoscopic technique, technical details must be considered. For each nerve the initial exposure is detailed and a plane of dissection developed. A variety of techniques were used in an attempt to maintain a subcutaneous plane. Difficulties encountered were mainly due to availability of an assistant. Endoscopes of different angulations were trailed to review which scope was most appropriate for each indication.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 3: Technical considerations. Page 27 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Di!lt.al end Develop a plane of dissection.

Once a nerve has been located via a minimally invasive exposure, developing a plane is performed using balloon dissection (Figures 3.1 and 3.2). Urinary catheter balloons were u ed for this purpose with 5 I 0 and 20m I capacity balloons.

Figure 3.1: Developing a plane of dissection

Figure 3.2: Lateral dissecting balloons to dissect along subcutaneous planes

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Yu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 3: Technical considerations. Page 28 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs Angle Of view ..Me

Dleu.l end The author is developing a range of dissecting baBoons to dissect along subcutaneous planes. As the Line drawing demonstrates (Figure 3.2), the balloon should preferentially dissect longitudinally to avoid pressure on the nerve.

Maintain the plane of dissection.

Figure 3.3: Maintain the plane of dissection @} Using an airtight portal, gas insufflation can be used to elevate a plane. The difficulty with this approach is the high risk of damaging the nerve when inserting the port "blind". This approach was abandoned after several failed attempts.

Figure 3.4: Maintain the plane of dissection Dll Suture elevation can be helpful when the surgeon has no assistant! The difficulty with this technique is that once a suture is elevating a plane, to make minor adjustments may take time and slow a procedure down.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 3: Technical considerations. Page 29 j Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs J "

DI!Stal end Figure 3.5: Maintain the plane of dissection (f.) Retractors are readily available in a variety of sizes as blade lengths. Depending upon the skiiUpatience of the surgeons' assistant, the retractor can prove to be the most useful instrument to elevate planes of dissection.

Figure 3.6: Maintain the plane of dissection @ "Span" Elevators: a novel invention ofthe author. To maintain a maximal elevation of a subcutaneous plane, a disposable device that expands on application was devised. Unfortunately noinsbRunentcornpany was interested in development of the concept at this stage.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 3: Technical considerations. Page 30 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs Angle Of view

Distal end Endoscopy

Figure 3.7: Endoscopy @} The 0 degree endoscope is useful for straight ahead or "line of sight'' view. Most useful when looking directly down on an object (suprascapular nerve). Not useful when looking along the shaft of a nerve.

Figure 3.8: Endoscopy ® The 30 degree endoscope is the most useful scope for a variety of applications. The slight angulation of the viewing angle lends it self to vision along the path of a nerve trunk.

Figure 3.9: Endoscopy (£} The 70 degree scope has little to offer in endoscopy of the subcutaneous planes. Although it is maximally of use when "looking around a comer", it was not routinely used in this study due to difficulty of appreciating anatomy at such a sharp angle.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 3: Technical considerations. Page 31 Fie:ld of vie·.v Peripheral nerve endoscopy " Dr Ralph Mobbs "" Anale of view ~.4.-----·~~"--·-~:J Distal end Visualization/ inspection within the plane: discussion

The purpose of reviewing the technical details was to discuss the minimally invasive endoscopic techniques used and how performed. An attempt to use carbon dioxide gas insufflation to perform nerve exposures within the subcutaneous and fascial tissue

30 planes was performed, based on the previous work of aesthetic plastic surgeons , however the risk was considered too high for damage to a nerve trunk with the initial use of a blunt trocar introducer.

Specific instrumentation was gradually adapted to the techniques discussed, more out of need than for any other reason (Figures 3.1 - 3 .9). A standard setup was utilized to dissect within the subcutaneous and fascial planes of the cadaver. An ultrasonic

scalpel would improve visualization by avoiding electrocautery smoke, however it was not available for this study.

Numerous problems encountered from a technical perspective include:

1. Creation of a tent-shaped cavity with the use of mechanical retractors.

2. One of the hands of the surgeon is necessary for retraction if an assistant is not

available

3. Instrument crowding

4. External supporting devices may be necessary if no assistant available

5. The skin's intrinsic elasticity may be lost if the cadaver is too old

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 3: Technical considerations. Page 32 Field of vie'N Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Distal end 6. Carbon dioxide insufflation may have numerous advantages but was too

difficult to use and the risk too great in the opinion of the author.

Similar approaches to facial plane surgery are being used by a variety of other specialties:

1. Cardiothoracic,31

2. Plastic/aesthetic,32

3. Head and neck, 33

4. General.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 3: Technical considerations. Page 33 FJeld of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy ,. Dr Ralph Mobbs , ""Ang!~:bfvi~ ~:.-=--=--=--=--=--=--=--:.; ~--J~~~j Distal end Chapter 4: Sciatic nerve endoscopy

Outline of chapter:

D Surgical objectives.

D Cadaveric approach. o Technical report based on an operative case. o Discussion oftechnical report.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 4: Sciatic nerve endoscopy Page 34 Field ofvi~N Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs . '- Angle Of view ~q:,.====· ~~-c:o.-::0':1 Distal end A sciatic nerve lesion is uncommon. In this chapter we review the approach used for endoscopy on the sciatic nerve on the cadaver, then report the utility of the endoscope in an 18-year-old female with multiple lesions ofher sciatic nerve. We describe a simple technique of endoscopic exploration of the sciatic nerve to assist intraoperative decision making. The case report is based on cadaveric work on sciatic nerve endoscopy, which is discussed.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 4: Sciatic nerve endoscopy Page 35 Field of vie·.v Peripheral nerve endoscopy , Dr Ralph Mobbs 'A11gle ofotie".v ...______-- -' .!=-~~ Di5talen.:l Surgical objectives

Injuries to the sciatic nerve cause neurologic deficit to the peroneal and tibial nerve distributions, with more severe deficits to the peroneal division compared to the tibial.

The long course of the sciatic nerve leaves it vulnerable to nerve injury from a variety of causes including misguided injection, hip arthroplasty, fracture or dislocation, and from prolonged compression, such as during coma. Sciatic nerve neuropathies caused

34 35 by mass lesions or by the piriformis muscle are rare. ,

Surgical approaches to the sciatic nerve for exploration involve long incisions and extensive dissection to visualize an appropriate length ofnerve.36 Long incisions with substantial dissection result in more pain and prolonged postoperative recovery. If the gluteus maximus muscle bulk is divided to expose the superior aspect of the nerve adjacent to the sciatic notch or piriformis muscle, this results in significant postoperative morbidity. There is little information in the literature that reviews approaches to the sciatic nerve for exploration. For proximal sciatic nerve tumour and trauma however, wide exposure for adequate visuali~ation may be necessary?7

An alternative novel minimally invasive approach that may be used for sciatic nerve inspection and exploration was developed.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 4: Sciatic nerve endoscopy Page36 Field ofvie'N Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Di5tal end Cadaveric Approach

The sciatic nerve is potentially a useful nerve for endoscopy due to the favourable anatomy of this structure at the inferior border of the gluteus maximus. Based on the cadaveric dissections, the nerve is located with relative ease between the biceps femoris and semi memb/tendinosus muscle groups. If there was a high content of adipose tissue in the cadaver, this could make the depth of dissection very deep and render the technique impossible.

Developing a plane superficial to the sciatic nerve in the cadaver was performed with ease. Even in the thin specimen, there was a well-defined fat plane around the nerve that could be developed with blunt ended dissecting scissors. Elevating the planes that had been developed either in a proximal or distal direction was performed with a hand held retractor and a good assistant! A 30 degree endoscope was of most benefit as the operator can visualize along the path of the nerve and then rotate the scope 180 degrees to visualize the superficial tissues (Figures 4.1 and 4.2). As the anatomy of the sciatic nerve is variable (Figure 4.3), a potential additional use of the technique could be for inspection of the nerve prior to lengthening the incision.

The light source from the 30-degree endoscope highlights the region of the piriformis muscle and the sciatic nerve emerging from its inferior edge. The gluteus muscle has been deflected to demonstrate the anatomy (Figure 4.1 ).

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 4: Sciatic nerve endoscopy Page37 Fieki ofvfew Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Di5tal end

Figure 4.1: Piriformis and the sciatic nerve emerging from its inferior angles

The endoscope has now been rotated 180 degrees. The operator would now have a view of the inferior gluteal neurovascular bundle not of the sciatic nerve. The 30 degree endoscope can therefore be used to give the operator a greater appreciation of the anatomy than a "straight shot' 0 degree endoscope (Figure 4.2).

Figure 4.2: View of the inferior gluteal neurovascular bundle

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervi ors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 4: ciatic nerve endoscopy Page 38 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Di5tal end

\, : .l\

Figure 4.3: Variation of the sciatic nerve

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supe.rvisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 4: Sciatic nerve endoscopy Page 39 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs "' Angle of view

Distal end Technical Report

An 18 year old female presented with pain on the posterior aspect of her thigh, leg

and the base of her foot. She also had moderate weakness of ankle dorsi flexion with

disturbance of gait. Lumbar spine imaging was negative, however pelvic/thigh MR

demonstrated multiple lesions of her right sciatic nerve (Figure 4.4). A decision to

explore the sciatic nerve was made to remove a lesion that presented to the surface of

the nerve for biopsy.

The patient was placed in the prone position on a Wilson frame in a similar posture

for spinal surgery. A limited incision was made to locate the sciatic nerve just inferior

to the gluteus maximus muscle bulk (Figure 4.5). The sciatic nerve was located

between the lateral biceps and medial semi-tendinosus muscle bulk by finger

palpation. A long blade retractor (Figure 4.6) was used to 'lift' the gluteus muscle

bulk so that an endoscope could be introduced for visualizing the proximal section of

the sciatic nerve (Figure 4.7). The plane of dissection for introduction ofthe retractor

blade is made easily as the nerve is enveloped in a fat along a fascial plane. The plane

can be created with either finger dissection or blunt dissection using the scissors

superficial to the nerve. The retractor creates a working space for the endoscope and

instruments. A view as far as the piriformis muscle was possible using a 30-degree

endoscope with detailed observation of the nerve lesions. Although the nerve was in

view at the base of the wound, the endoscope was used to document a single snapshot

of the nerve for later study (Figure 4.8). The distal aspect of the nerve could also be

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 4: Sciatic nerve endoscopy Page40 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs Angle of view .N

(Figure 4.9).

A single lesion was taken for biopsy following exploration of the nerve.

Histopathology revealed schwannoma of the nerve.

The arrow points toward the sciatic nerve lesion. Note the marked wasting of the gluteal muscles, likely due to entrapment ofthe gluteal neurovascular bundle by a lesion.

Figure 4.4: Sciatic nerve lesion

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 4: Sciatic nerve endoscopy Page 41 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy ; Dr Ralph Mobbs 1\ngle of view L Axl6

Dl~ l end The incision can be lengthened at either pole to provide greater exposure if necessary.

Figure 4.5: Incision lengthened at either pole to provide greater exposure

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 4: Sciatic nerve endoscopy Page42 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy I ; Dr Ralph Mobbs

D15talend Retractors are used to access areas to create the necessary working space.

Figure 4.6: Create the necessary working space

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 4: Sciatic nerve endoscopy Page43 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Dls"tal end The proximal segment of the sciatic nerve is clearly visible using the endoscope.

Note the retractor blade in the superior aspect of the picture lifting the gluteal bulk so as to create a working space. The white arrows outline the inferior aspect of the piriformis muscle. The black arrows demonstrate the medial aspect of the nerve. The two-tone arrow points toward a nerve tumour presenting to the surface.

Figure 4.7: The proximal segment of the sciatic nerve

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 4: Sciatic nerve endoscopy Page44 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs Angle ofvtew lhle

Dhltal end The black arrow points superiorly toward the piriformis muscle, the white arrow inferiorly. Note the incision in the inferior aspect of the nerve from where a large encapsulated tumour was removed.

Figure 4.8: The sciatic nerve on view at the base of the exposure

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 4: Sciatic nerve endoscopy Page 45 Fleta of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Di5UI end The black arrow points toward another Lesion. The white arrow is the border of the semitendinosus muscle.

Figure 4.9: A distal view of the sciatic nerve

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 4: Sciatic nerve endoscopy Page46 Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Di5tal c:!UI Discussion

The presented case demonstrates that endoscopic techniques may reduce the need for extensive open surgical dissections, as discussed by previous authors.38 Although the schwannoma was removed from the sciatic nerve at the base of our exposure using loupe magnification, the endoscope added value to the procedure by documenting the gross appearance of the nerve and aiding in decision making for the most appropriate lesion to remove. The trend in neurosurgery of treating disease with minimally invasive techniques to reduce approach related trauma is also applicable to peripheral nerve surgery.

Issues of safety require discussion. Ifthe operator is not confident of the anatomy or pathology, then a more open exposure is necessary as damage to the sciatic nerve can leave the patient with markedly reduced function of the lower limb. The incision that we propose is for proximal sciatic nerve pathology only. In addition, our approach enables the surgeon to lengthen the incision in both directions to expose a greater length of nerve ifthe need arises. Following exploration, the surgeon may need to extend only one pole ofthe incision, thereby reducing the amount of approach related trauma. The issues of safety will be answered by a prospective clinical series.

Body habitus is a major factor that may render the technique impossible. If the patient has a high degree of adiposity, the sciatic nerve may be very deep and difficult to find in a limited exposure. The angle of approach made by the endoscope into the wound (Figure 4.5) may be difficult if the distance between the skin surface and the

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 4: Sciatic nerve endoscopy Page47 Fie!d of v1~w Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs ' Angle ofview

Di5tal end nerve is too long. The length of the endoscope would be a factor as a short shaft may not reach the depth of the wound. The type of endoscope (i.e.: 0, 30 or 70 degree) is a factor as the endoscope shaft is not able to be introduced in parallel with the nerve, and thus a 30 or 70 degree endoscope may be necessary to "look around the corner'l of the subcutaneous retracted edge to visualize the nerve. Retraction of the subcutaneous tissues to create a working space is also challenging if these tissues have a high adipose content and the retractor blade is very deep, or the assistant is incapable of the necessary retraction. Fixed retractor blades similar to cranial endoscopl9 is not an option, as the limb cannot be "fixed in space" as with the cranial vault with 3-point pin fixation.

Each surgeon must decide if they will accept a new technique given the limitations on the learning curve involved. The author believes however that the techniques outlined in this chapter are not difficult to conceptualise or perform, and that morbidity would be minimal.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 4: Sciatic nerve endoscopy Page48 Fie!&! ofvie·.v Peripheral nerve endoscopy , Dr Ralph Mobbs " Angle of view ------L-=--e-~~':J Di!>talend Chapter 5: Suprascapular nerve endoscopy

Outline of chapter: o Technical report based on an operative case. oMethods. o Operative technique. o Discussion.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 5: Suprascapular nerve endoscopy Page 49 Flelc! of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy "' Dr Ralph Mobbs "'Angleofview I . , ·~------·- ~··"'=~t~j

The suprascapular nerve (SScN) is derived from the upper trunk of the brachial plexus from C5,6. The nerve traverses the floor of the posterior triangle and passes beneath

40 the superior transverse scapular ligament • The function of this ligament in the human is uncertain.41 The nerve then supplies supraspinatus, infraspinatus and the posterior aspect of the capsule of the shoulder joint. The nerve has also been

42 described to have cutaneous branches •

Suprascapular neuropathy is an uncommon cause of shoulder pain and weakness and

43 therefore may be overlooked as an etiologic factor • Entrapment of the SScN was first reported in the literature in 1932.44 Interestingly, humans are not the only mammals that are affected by this entrapment neuropathy,45 with the canine entrapment syndrome treated by partial osteotomy of the notch.46 The diagnosis of suprascapular neuropathy is based on clinical fmdings and abnormal electrodiagnostic test results, however magnetic resonance imaging can reach a positive, topographic and etiologic diagnosis ofSScN entrapment.47 The suprascapular nerve is susceptible to compression at the suprascapular notch, and more rarely at the spinoglenoid notch.

Causes of suprascapular neuropathy include traction injury at the level ofthe superior transverse scapular ligament or the spinoglenoid ligament, ganglion cysts, nerve

48 49 tumours , ligamentous calcification and direct trauma to the nerve.

The syndrome often afflicts athletes, particularly those in basketball, volleyball, weight lifting, and gymnastics. The chief complaint is the insidious onset of a deep, dull aching pain in the posterior part of the shoulder and upper periscapular region.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 5: Suprascapular nerve endoscopy Page 50 Field ofvie·.v Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs ... Anal~: Ofvit:W

..._____ ------'-.llxis_J i Distalent:l The pain is noncircumscribed and does not involve the neck or radiate down the arm.

Weakness is confined to the supraspinatus (i.e., in the initiation of shoulder abduction) and to the infraspinatus, the only muscle responsible for external rotation of the humerus. Atrophy ofthese muscles causes hollowing ofthe infraspinous fossa and prominence of the scapular spine. (Atrophy of the supraspinatus is not obvious due to the overlying trapezius.) Deep pressure over the midpoint of the superior scapular border may produce discomfort.

Operations for decompression of the suprascapular notch have been described from the anterior and posterior aspect. Advantage of the anterior approach includes identification of the superior trunk of the brachial plexus and subsequent accurate localization of the suprascapular nerve, which can then be followed to the scapular notch. The posterior approach is a more direct route to the notch, however the difficulty is that the depth of the exposure makes operating around the suprascapular artery and nerve challenging. 5°

Technical Report

A 41-year-old healthy female presented with a 14-month history of left shoulder weakness following a low speed motorbike accident. There was no associated pain.

Shoulder external rotation was weak at 3 out of 5. The weakness resulted in significant morbidity with daily duties. Investigations included somatosensory evoked potentials of the SScN and demonstrated response differences consistent with

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 5: Suprascapular nerve endoscopy Page 51 Ffe!d of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy "' Dr Ralph Mobbs "" Angle of view "'------~ ~-~ -'~':1 neuropathy at the level of the superior transverse scapular ligament. MRI was unhelpful.

The author has trailed various endoscopic techniques on the cadaveric model including anterior and posterior approaches to the suprascapular notch. A posterior approach is described here as this was considered the most safe. Following general anaesthesia, the patient was positioned supine with a large sandbag under the ipsilateral shoulder. A 3cm incision was made medial to the suprascapular notch

(Figure 5.1) and blunt dissection performed until the superior border of the scapulae was reached. To avoid damaging the suprascapular artery, the initial approach was

purposely made medial to this structure. After the superior border of the scapula is reached, dissection is performed laterally along the superior border until the palpating

finger could feel the superior transverse scapular ligament. At this stage the

endoscope was inserted and the superior transverse scapular ligament visualized

(Figures 5.2 and 5.3). A dissector was used to delineate the full extent of the

ligament. A nerve stimulator was used at this point to verify the SScN.

Following clear visualization of the boundaries of the ligament, a straight micro -

scissor was used to divide the ligament under direct vision (Figure 5.4). After

division of the ligament (Figure 5.5), the nerve is inspected with a blunt nerve hook to

verify that no further compressive elements are present. The patient was discharged

within 24 hours of surgery. At 12 months follow-up, her shoulder pain has settled and

external rotation power is now 4+/5. Restoration of muscle wasting is incomplete,

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 5: Suprascapular nerve endoscopy Page 52 Field ofvie-N Peripheral nerve endoscopy .; Dr Ralph Mobbs .... Angle bfvlew ---,~------~-- ~=-l"-_~i~J Distal en::l however previous authors have commented on this finding following SScN decompression. 51

Methods

Of 15 cadavers operated on, 12 were suitable for examination. On the first cadaver, the incision and approach was made directly over the suprascapular notch, and as a consequence the suprascapular artery was damaged with the approach. On the living patient, this complication would be disastrous, as the operative field would be blocked out with arterial blood. In addition the two ends of the artery may retract proving haemostasis very difficult. A further two cadavers had calcified superior transverse

scapular ligaments that were unable to be divided and the procedure abandoned.

These two patients would have either a type V or VI suprascapular notch as based on the classification ofRengachary et al.52

Retraction down the narrow corridor can be prepared with either a nasal speculum or

versa-trak™ system. The retraction also aids in haemostasis as the muscle bulk is

placed under stretch. Haemostasis is also aided by initial infiltration with a

vasoconstricting agent.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 5: Suprascapular nerve endoscopy Page 53 Field of vie.v Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs ..._ Angle" bfview ,: I " ---~~------~ ~'"~ .c~-~~~J Di!'ital end Operative technique

General anaesthesia with the patient positioned supine. A large sandbag should be placed under the midscapular region to lift the superior scapula region into view.

A linear incision is made medial to the notch. Image-intensification may be used to check that the approach is medial to the notch. This is an important point, as you do not want to approach the notch from directly above, and risk damaging the artery, which lies superior to the transverse scapular ligament.

Blunt dissection through the muscle bulk of trapezius and supraspinatus until the

superior border of the scapular is reached.

An appropriate retractor system is used to create the corridor necessary to introduce

instruments.

With endoscopic view, blunt dissect in a lateral direction along the superior border of the scapular until the medial insertion of the ligament is reached.

Using a blunt hook, palpate around the ligament and identify the nerve. From the

cadaveric experience, the nerve is located laterally in the suprascapular notch and

therefore the operator should divide the ligament as medial as possible.

To confirm the suprascapular nerve, a nerve stimulator can be used.

Haemostasis can be achieved with bipolar cautery and care should be taken when

removing the retractor to localize any bleeding points.

Normal arm movement should commence the following day from surgery to help

minimize scar entrapment of the nerve.

Discharge could be either the same day or the next day depending on patient co

morbidities.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 5: Suprascapular nerve endoscopy Page 54 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

The incision is made medial to a vertical line made by the coracoid process.

Figure 5.1: Incision on cadaver

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 5: Suprascapular nerve endoscopy Page 55 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs l "'- Angle Of view L ~===~~~'-- I Axle..l

, ' ' ' ' ' \ ' ' \ ' ' I ' ,/ ~ ' \ ,I \ I ' \ I \ ,I

Figure 5.2: Expanded endoscopic view of operative region

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 5: Suprascapular nerve endoscopy Page 56 Field of vtew Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Di5tal end The black arrows (x4) outline the superior transverse scapula ligament. The white arrows (x2) outline the suprascapular nerve. Note that to the left of the white arrows the artery can be seen passing superficial to the ligament.

Figure 5.3 : Corresponding endoscopic view of Figure 5.2

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 5: Suprascapular nerve endoscopy Page 57 Reid of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs I Angle of view Distal end Note that the endoscope was retracted from the operative field to make the introduction of the sharp scissor safer.

Figure 5.4: Division of the ligament with a micro scissor

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Yu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 5: Suprascapular nerve endoscopy Page 58 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs Angle Of view

~====;::~=~ 1 -Me Distal end The divided ligament (black arrows) and the released nerve (white arrows). Note the indentation of the suprascapular nerve due to the compressing ligament.

Figure 5.5: The divided ligament

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 5: Suprascapular nerve endoscopy Page 59 Field of vfew Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs Angle bfvlew

Dl5talend Following the dissection of multiple cadavers, the suprascapular nerve was consistently seen to be running in the lateral aspect of the notch (star). The arrows point to the medial aspect of the notch where the ligament has a broad attachment

(Figure 5.6). The Hgament can be safely divided in this location.

Figure 5.6: Where to cut the transverse scapular ligament

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 5: Suprascapular nerve endoscopy Page 60 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Distal end The Figure 5.7 demonstrates the Figure 5.6 before more detailed dissection. The white arrows delineate the notch. The black arrow points toward the suprascapular nerve.

Figure 5.7: Before more detailed dissection

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 5: Suprascapular nerve endoscopy Page 61 Fie!d ofvie-N Peripheral nerve endoscopy ; Dr Ralph Mobbs ' Angle of view "'-.._' -----~-=~~i~j Distal end Discussion

Neuroendoscopy follows a general trend in neurosurgery of treating disease with minimally invasive techniques to reduce approach related trauma of normal tissues and to improve visualization of intraoperative pathology. Although peripheral nerve surgery does not lend itself well to minimally invasive techniques, authors have proposed that "improved imaging combined with evolving endoscopic techniques may reduce the need for extensive open surgical dissections" .53 A standard approach and exposure of the SScN involves extensive muscle dissection and therefore results in a painful incision and prolonged postoperative recovery. The endoscope allows superior illumination and magnification at depth making possible a narrow corridor to the pathology. This narrow corridor can be made with minimal muscle dissection and maintained with adequate retraction.

The issue of safety is paramount. With all new proposed approaches, the operator must be comfortable with the anatomy and the equipment, in this case the endoscopy set-up. In our study there was one unintentional nerve division during the approach/exposure (1/15 = 6. 7%). In this case, while attempting to locate the ligament, vigorous dissection was performed with a scissor rather than the safer option of the surgeons' finger. Over time, issues of safety will be answered by a prospective clinical series. Randomised Control Trials will not be possible due to the small number of these entrapment lesions that present to the peripheral nerve surgeon.

To reach an adequate number of patients would require too lengthy a study. In

conclusion, each surgeon must decide if they will accept a new technique given the

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 5: Suprascapular nerve endoscopy Page 62 Fl~ld of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs ..., Al7eleofvlew ------~ ----~0 ~:_0i~j Di5tal end limitations of the learning curve. Compressive lesions attributable to suprascapular

54 notch entrapment had the best improvement with surgical decompression •

Endoscopy provides the venue for these improvements to be performed in a less invasive manner.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 5: Suprascapular nerve endoscopy Page 63 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs "' .Anele of view

Di5talend Chapter 6: Ulnar nerve endoscopy

Outline of chapter:

o Single Portal Exposure.

oMethods.

o Discussion.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 6: Ulnar nerve endoscopy Page 64 field ofvit:'N Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Distal end Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) is the second most common entrapment neuropathy of the upper limb, next to carpal tunnel syndrome. Most frequently, UNE occurs in the region of the retroepicondylar (ulnar) groove due to various pathological

5 processes. 5 In 23% of cases in one study, no specific cause could be identified. 56 The remainder can be attributed a variety of aetiologies including: external pressure, intragroove pressure due to repetitive flexion, chronic stretch associated with valgus deformity, tight anatomical confines within the cubital canal, bony/scar impingement,

57 58 anomalous muscles/bands and mass lesions. ,

The clearest way of classifying UNE is anatomically. Entrapment can occur at four locations about the elbow joint. From proximal to distal these are 1. The medial

intramuscular septum/Arcade of Struthers, 2. The retroepicondylar groove, 3. The humeroulnar arcade (true cubital tunnel syndrome), 4. The exit point from the flexor

carpi ulnaris through the deep flexor pronator aponet]Josis.59 Traditionally, diagnosis

ofUNE has relied primarily on clinical and electrophysiologic evaluation with

60 61 occasion use of roentgenography and thermography. • Magnetic Resonance

Imaging (MRI) is emerging as a potential addition to the assessment ofUNE,

allowing more precise anatomicallocalisation.62 To the author's knowledge there

63 64 65 have been three other studies reporting the utility ofMRI for UNE. • •

In addition to MRI for assessment ofUNE, the role of endoscopy has been discussed

in the literature. Although not a major focus in this study, the author has attempted

endoscopy on this nerve with potential benefits to the standard exposure.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 6: Ulnar nerve endoscopy Page 65 Field of vir:N Peripheral nerve endoscopy ., Dr Ralph Mobbs "" A11gie ofvieo.v L_&· ', '-..._-----~-~-=- ·- _l:j Dlstale11d Single Portal Exposure

Endoscopy as a new technique for endoscopic release of the ulnar nerve at the elbow

has been designed for cubital tunnel syndrome and discussed by some authors.66 One

group makes a series ofthree 5 mm incisions along the line of the ulnar nerve with the

skin and subcutaneous tissue lifted to produce a provisional space. As discussed in

Chapter 3, this would produce a ''tenf' shaped cavity. An endoscope was inserted

through the one incision, and the constricting ligaments and fascia were released

using a retrograde knife inserted through the other incision under endoscopic vision.

This group has treated eight patients and successful results were achieved. Potential

benefits include an earlier return to work and daily activity due to early healing of

incisions and minimal post-operative pain.

The author has been attempting a "single portal" exposure to achieve the same goals

on the cadaver.

Methods

The anatomy of the ulnar nerve at the region of the elbow lends it self to a minimally

invasive exposure due to its relative superficial course and proximity to easily found

structures, such as the medial epicondyle. Locating the nerve proximal to the

epicondyle results in the most rapid and safe exposure, as the nerve is unlikely to be

affected by pathologies at this level, as it is proximal to the cubital tunnel. After the

nerve has been identified, dissection in a proximal and distal direction is usually not

difficult due to the fat planes around the nerve (Figure 6.1).

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 6: Ulnar nerve endoscopy Page 66 flel&l of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy "' Dr Ralph Mobbs ... Angle: afviel'l --- --=-~~1~~1 Distal en.:!

After visualization of the nerve and adequate retraction to create a working space, the nerve can easily be dissected free using the endoscope in one hand and dissecting

scissors in the other hand. From commencing the dissection proximal to the

epicondyle, the nerve can be dissected until it reaches the level of the flexor carpi

ulnaris (FCU), which is the endpoint of exposure in a standard dissection. Figure 6.1

represents a "standard" exposure of the ulnar nerve for surgery on an entrapment

neuropathy. Using endoscopic inspection, the author believes this incision can be

limited to one third ofthe incision shown.

This exposure of the ulnar nerve at the elbow demonstrates the usual site of

entrapment at the cubital tunnel. To endoscopically expose the nerve, the nerve can

be initially located proximal to the elbow (gray arrows) or distal (white arrows). The

author initially exposed the nerve proximally, however due to technical difficulties

now exposes the nerve at the region of the FCU (white arrows) and endoscopically

dissects proximally.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 6: Ulnar nerve endoscopy Page 67 Fle!a of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Di5tal end

Figure 6.1: Exposure of the ulnar nerve at the elbow

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 6: Ulnar nerve endoscopy Page 68 Field ofvie-N Peripheral nerve endoscopy ; Dr Ralph Mobbs ... Anglcofvlcw ~------~---=-=-l~i~J

D~5tal end Discussion

The difficulties of utilizing this approach for patients however include:

The ulnar nerve in the region of the entrapment may well be scarred to surrounding tissues, such as the fibres than comprise the cubital tunnel. This could potentially make the exposure dangerous if the operator could not appreciate the anatomy of the nerve endoscopically.

If you dissect in a proximal to distal direction, you therefore have to introduce

instruments from an axilla to hand direction. On the operating table, in practical

terms, this requires the operator to be standing/sitting at the axilla of the patient and to

be directing the instruments in an un-ergonomical direction with "crowding".

For the reasons outlined above, it may well be easier to expose the nerve distal to the

epicondyle and dissect in a proximal direction. This certainly makes the procedure

easier for the surgeon who can now stand/sit in a more comfortable position and

introduce instruments in an "uncrowded" fashion.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 6: Ulnar nerve endoscopy Page 69 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Di!>tal end Chapter 7: Sural nerve harvest via endoscopy

Outline of chapter: o Surgical anatomy.

E7 Advantages of minimally invasive harvest of sural nerve. o Technique: Surgical approach.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 7: Sural nerve harvest via endoscopy Page 70 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Distal end Surgical anatomy

The sural nerve passes down the posterolateral side of leg and onto dorsal aspect of lateral side of foot, giving rise to lateral calcaneal branches (the medial branch supplied by tibial nerve). Its terminal branches consist oflateral dorsal cutaneous nerve and the lateral calcaneal braches. The sural nerve, which lies superficial to the deep fascia below lmee, is used as guide to the tibial nerve as one can follow the sural nerve upwards to pierce deep fascia and lead to the tibial nerve which is its parent trunk.

Except for unmyelinated autonomic fibres, the sural is entirely sensory. It innervates lateral & posterior third of leg and lateral aspect of foot and heel & lateral portion of the ankle.

The main role of this nerve to the peripheral nerve surgeon is to provide cable grafts.

Up to 25 em of nerve graft may be harvested and used as a cable graft. The blood supply to the sural nerve usually comes thru the muscular perforating branches of the posterior tibial artery or cutaneous branches of the peroneal artery.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 7: Sural nerve harvest via endoscopy Page 71 Fiela of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy , Dr Ralph Mobbs ..;, Angle afvitwt ----~·-~=~l~i~j

Advantages of Technique

The usual procedure to harvest a sural nerve graft requires a long incision that is essentially the same length as the length of graft that is required. Thus, if the surgeon requires a 20 em graft to reconstruct a nerve, the incision will be at least 20cm. For many patients, a long incision simply adds to the overall trauma of the surgery which

usually will have two or more incisions depending on the nerve reconstruction procedure.

There have been several reports in the literature outlining minimally invasive

approaches to harvest the sural nerve. A recent report details the use of a vein harvesting technique using a sharp, round vein "stripper" to harvest the nerve. A

problem with this technique is that the surgeon does not visualize the procedure and

haemostasis is not secured at the time of harvest. The technique outlined by the

author gives the operator the option of using bipolar diathermy during the harvest for

haemostasis (Figure 7.1 ).

An additional long leg incision has many disadvantages:

1. Cosmetically poor, especially for young women.

2. Potentially a slow healing incision for patients with diabetes.

3. Patients will not mobilize in the postoperative period as rapidly with a long

and potentially painful incision. This has follow-on effects with an increased

risk of chest and DVT risk.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 7: Sural nerve harvest via endoscopy Page 72 Fie!.:! of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs ... Angle of vle:w

Di5tal end 4. Psychologically a patient feels not as "damaged" by the surgery if a minimalist

approach is adopted.

I, I

Figure 7.1: Sequence of sural graft harvest

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 7: Sural nerve harvest via endoscopy Page 73 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs ' Angle i:ri'vlew ----~ ~~···~~'~J

Surgical approach

The above Figure 7.1 summarises the surgical approach to a minimally invasive harvest of the sural nerve:

1. Part 1 demonstrates the outline of the sural nerve. It is essential that the

surgeon has landmarks for the nerve and mark out on the skin this outline.

The most reliable location to fmd the nerve however is at the classic spot for a

"sural nerve biopsy", being posterior to the lateral malleolus approximately

halfway between the malleolus and the tendo-achilles (Figure 7.2-7.3).

2. Part 2 shows the introduction of an endoscope at the starting point. The

surgeon has a variety of ways of dissecting the nerve. These include, but are

not limited to, balloon dissection or simply using a dissecting scissor under

endoscopic guidance, which is the preferred method of the author. When the

length of the endoscope has been reached with the dissection, the surgeon has

to make a further incision so that the process can be repeated again (Figure

7.4).

3. Part 3 shows that 3 mini-incisions are usually all that is required to harvest a

long length of nerve, say greater than 20 em in length that would be suitable

for most reconstructive procedures. Brachial plexus reconstruction may

require longer grafts and it is commonplace to harvest 2 sural nerves. In this

case the procedure could be repeated on the contra lateral leg. The incisions

are quick to close and the usual pressure bandage that is used for a long

incision may not be necessary.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 7: Sural nerve harvest via endoscopy Page 74 Fiel.t:l of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Figure 7.2: Incision posterior to the lateral malleolus and the sural nerve

A 1.5cm incision has been made posterior to the lateral malleolus and the sural nerve identified in a standard fashion. A Mollison retractor has been used to keep the exposure open. The direction that the endoscope is angled is demonstrated. If an assistant were present, a fixed blade type retractor would be inserted to create space for additional instruments.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 7: Sural nerve harvest via endoscopy Page 75 field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Di5tal end

Figure 7.3: After the nerve dissection

This figure demonstrates that after the nerve has been dissected for as long as possible given the length of the endoscope, a new incision can now be made using the light of the endoscope as a guide. Even if the cadaver has a relatively high level of adiposity, the intense light from the endoscope can still be seen through the skin to guide an incision. Most standard endoscopes have a length of 12-15 em therefore to harvest a length of nerve of20-25cm, three incisions is enough.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 7: Sural nerve harvest via endoscopy Page 76 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs Angle Of view

"5

0151"411end

Figure 7.4: Four incisions extending from the ankle to the political fossa

There are 4 incisions extending from the ankle to the political fossa. The distal three incisions would be adequate for most reconstructive procedures and the total length of the incision would be under Scm rather than 25+cm. The main difficulties encountered include the division of side branches and maintenance ofhaemostasis during the procedure. Issues of haemostasis were not a problem with the cadavers however! Another technical consideration is that the patient would have to be positioned prone for the nerve harvest as the supine position makes the procedure very difficult.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 7: Sural nerve harvest via endoscopy Page 77 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy .. Dr Ralph Mobbs ... Angle of view _ J Axisi ---~~-- ____ J Distal end Chapter 8: Tarsal tunnel endoscopy

Outline of chapter:

El Tarsal tunnel syndrome.

El Operative technique.

ElFigures.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 8: Tarsal tunnel endoscopy Page 78 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy "' Dr Ralph Mobbs "' Anglehfvlew

·~-'<------~~'"-~"_!0<':J

Tarsal tunnel syndrome (TIS) is defined as an extrinsic or intrinsic compression

67 neuropathy of the posterior tibial nerve or one of its branches , first described in

68 1962 • Although far less common, TIS is analogous to the carpal tunnel syndrome

69 at the wrist • Symptoms consist oflongitudinal arch pain, plantar anaesthesia

70 or paraesthesia, exacerbated with activity or after prolonged ambulation •

The roof of the tarsal tunnel is the flexor retinaculum and is formed by the deep fascia

71 of the leg and the deep transverse fascia • The proximal and distal borders ofthe tunnel are formed by the inferior and superior margins of the flexor retinaculum. As the tibial nerve passes behind the medial malleolus and through the tarsal tunnel it proceeds to bifurcate into cutaneous branches, articular branches and vascular branches. The main divisions of the posterior tibial nerve include the calcaneal,

72 medial plantar nerve and lateral plantar nerve branches •

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 8: Tarsal tunnel endoscopy Page 79 Fie!.:! ofvie'N Peripheral nerve endoscopy "' Dr Ralph Mobbs " Angle of view --====""'-:__~-'=-'~:j DistZll end Tarsal tunnel syndrome

There is a large range of aetiologies that have been associated with the TIS, including idiopathic, post-traumatic, neoplastic, inflammatory factors, varicosities,

73 4 5 6 tenosynovitis, cysts and neurilemmoma / / / • In addition there have been 7 reports in the literature ofTIS related to an anomalous muscle.

77 Although electrodiagnostic studies are not an absolute diagnostic measure , radiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging have been

successfully used to determine any bony or soft tissue aetiologies for TIS.

Comparison to carpal tunnel syndrome can be made. Anomalous structures around the wrist have been documented as a possible causative factor for carpal tunnel

78 syndrome , so it is no surprise that anomalous structures adjacent to the ankle have

been documented.

Cadaveric studies have investigated tibial nerve tension as a potential causative factor

for TIS and concluded that tibial nerve tension increases within a surgically created

79 cadaveric pes planus foot •

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 8: Tarsal tunnel endoscopy Page 80 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Dl!!tal end Operative Technique

Figure 8.1: Endoscopic decompression of the tarsal tunnel: right foot

The operative sequence of endoscopic decompression of the tarsal tunnel: right foot exposure is demonstrated in Figure 8.1.

The aim of endoscopic division of the flexor retinaculum begins with the initial identification of the tibial nerve. lfthe nerve is always in the vision ofthe surgeon, the risk of damaging the nerve is reduced. The surgeon must initially position the patient so that the ankle landmarks can be appreciated and the path of the nerve (and its branches the medial plantar nerve, lateral plantar nerve and medial calcaneal nerve marked out on the skin. The initial incision involves a linear cut approximately Scm superior to the medial malleolus in a line that is bisected by the medial malleolus and tendo-ach i lies.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 8: Tarsal tunnel endoscopy Page 81 Fle!d of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy ; Dr Ralph Mobbs ... ,Angle ofvi~r.v

O\.._ ....______--- __c;J~~~~.~ Di!>talend Following identification of the neurovascular bundle, the nerve can be further

identified by the use of a nerve stimulator to visualize the flexion of the plantar

muscles of the foot that are supplied by the branches of the tibial nerve. Using blunt

dissecting scissors, a plane of dissection can be initiated superficial to the nerve and the plane maintained by fixed blade retractors. The endoscope can be inserted to

visualize the nerve and sequentially divide the fibres ofthe flexor retinaculum that are

superficial to the nerve. If the tarsal tunnel is very "tight" and the constricting bands

of the retinaculum are difficult to elevate from the tibial nerve, a blunt dissector

should be first introduced to create a plane between the nerve and retinaculum prior to

division of the retinacular fibres.

The extent of the decompression distally is not an exact science. The surgeon should

evaluate how tight the tunnel created by the retinaculum is at each stage of division of

this structure. If an anomalous muscle or a nerve sheath tumour is encountered, the

surgeon should abandon the endoscopic technique and adopt an open approach and

lengthen the incision to visualize the full extent ofthe pathology.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 8: Tarsal tunnel endoscopy Page 82 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs "' Angle Of view ~===~~.,.....;: LAxia l

Figure 8.2: Prosected specimen demonstrating the path of the posterior tibial nerve

In Figure 8.2, the proximal blunt probe is well above the ''tarsal tunnel" and may serve as an initial site for identifying the nerve. The middle probe is inserted within the tunnel, which has been partially opened proximal to the middle probe. The distal probe demonstrates the medial plantar nerve, well beyond the tarsal tunnel.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 8: Tarsal tunnel endoscopy Page 83 Field of vie-.v Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs ----~===-~~~-0" !:!'X'~J Di£-tal end Chapter 9: Other nerves attempted

Outline of chapter:

o Median nerve at elbow.

o Brachial plexus.

o Posterior Interroseous Nerve.

o Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve.

!C?Peroneal.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 9: Other nerves attempted Page 84 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs "" Angle ofvlew

D1stal en.:! Median nerve

Problems affecting the median nerve at the level of the elbow include the pathologies: supracondylar spurs & ligaments (Struthers), fractures of the humerus (supracondylar)

in children, elbow dislocation, injection injury and the pronator teres syndrome. Pain

in the volar forearm exacerbated by repeated pronation is a classic sign, with little weakness or sensory loss.

The author initially considered that the median nerve at the elbow would offer itself to

an endoscopic exposure due to the relative superficial course and the flexibility of the

superficial structures such as the skin and subcutaneous fat planes. Using the biceps tendon at the elbow as a landmark, a small incision was made proximal to the elbow

crease and the median nerve located with little effort.

Although technically possible, the procedure was abandoned for several reasons:

1. An entrapment at this location is very rare. For a surgeon to become

comfortable with a new technique, there must be a minimum limit to the

number of procedures performed to upkeep a particular skill. This nerve at

this location would not support such numbers.

2. To reach the Anterior Interosseous Nerve would require elevation of planes

that would not readily accept elevation, such at the flexor digitorum

superficialis.

3. The brachial artery; the potential to damage this large vessel makes the

procedure unappealing.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 9: Other nerves attempted Page 85 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs ..., OAngle of view ..______-~ -~ ~':J DiGtalend Brachial plexus

Exposures for brachial plexus surgery are usually extensive. A minimally invasive approach to the brachial plexus for pathologies such as cervical band/rib or reconstruction would be most welcomed. Unfortunately the complexity of anatomy in this region renders this an unworkable option. The complexity of the facial planes, branching patterns from the trunks and cords, vascular structures, bony structures and thoracic duct make any minimalist approach to this region far to dangerous. Although anatomy was reviewed on the cadavers, any serious attempt to explore this structure endoscopically was abandoned.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 9: Other nerves attempted Page 86 Field of vie-.v Peripheral nerve endoscopy ; Dr Ralph Mobbs .., Angle: of view

' ·I I ------_-__-_ ~ -~~~=~ ~~~j Difital end Posterior Interroseous Nerve

The posterior interroseous nerve (PIN) is the deep motor branch of radial nerve and

supplies all of the extrinsic wrist extensors except for the extensor carpi radialis

longus. The PIN passes through the supinator muscle in its course from anterior to the posterior surface of the forearm. The most common site for entrapment of the

nerve is the arcade ofFroche, this arcade being absent in full term foetuses but is

present in 30% of adults and may develop in response to repeated rotary movement of

forearm. Inciting causes for dysfunction of this nerve include; radiocapitellar joint

80 81 ganglions and synovitis and congenital tightness of ligamentous arcade ofFrohse. ,

The technique for decompression of the PIN involves two approaches: Anterior and

Posterior. The anterior approach is more advantageous since is allows decompression

of all points of compression including fibrous bands, radial recurrent vessels, the

arcade ofFrohse and distal edge ofthe supinator at its exit. The posterior approach

only allows decompression at the proximal and distal aspects of the supinator muscle.

A proposed incision on the anterolateral aspect of the arm just proximal to elbow

flexion crease. Dissection was performed between brachialis & brachioradialis to

locate the radial nerve in the distal aspect of the arm, just proximal to elbow flexion

crease. The radial nerve was traced from proximal to distal. Difficulties were

encountered however.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 9: Other nerves attempted Page 87 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Di5tal end To elevate the muscle bulk that overlies the PIN was difficult. In addition there were numerous vessels encountered that were at a high risk of being damaged with the exposure (Figure 9.1). This approach was therefore abandoned.

Figure 9.1: Proximal forearm, right side. Path ofPIN nerve

This specimen demonstrates the radial nerve dividing into the PIN and the SSRN.

The probe is inserted into the arcade of Froche. If a surgeon attempts to identify the

radial nerve at the elbow level, elevating the muscle/fat/skin planes would be too

dangerous with potential to damage recurrent radial vessels and more superficial

cutaneous nerves.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 9: Other nerves attempted Page 88 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy "' Dr Ralph Mobbs .... Angle.ofvle~l ·-~,======'···~-~~-LA:

Meralgia paresthetica (MP) is a syndrome of pain, an isolated disturbance of sensation, or both in the distribution of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN). It usually starts with numbness or a tingling, burning pain and evolves into hypaesthesia,

82 which is painful in the anterolateral thigh • The male to female ratio is 2.8:1 and the involved side is split evenly between the right- 36% and the left 38%. The remaining

22% of cases present with bilateral symptoms. The majority of patients experience a

decrease of touch, pain and temperature but preserved pressure sensation in the LFCN

distribution. There are multiple aetiologies for this condition but obesity is an

important factor with 90.7% of patients being overweight(> 79.5 kg). A recent

weight gain of 6.8 to 9 kg has been reported in up to 8% of patients with this

83 condition. Operative treatment is by either neurolysis or transection • The question

of the superior technique is unsettled, because no critical analysis comparing results of

both techniques is available.

Werner Hager, a German surgeon gave the first description of an injury to the LFCN

84 in 1885 • His patient complained of thigh pain following a hip trauma on the dance

85 floor! The name "meralgia parasthetica" was given 10 years later by Roth • The

vunerability ofthe nerve has been investigated by many authors and a reflection of the

unique course of the nerve.

The preferred surgical treatment for MP after more conservative management has

failed remains controversial. In theory, the release ofthe presumed entrapment in the

region of the anterosuperior spine of ileum should work and neurolysis, if properly

86 performed, should relieve symptoms more often than it does • The high rate of

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 9: Other nerves attempted Page 89 Field ofvi.~.v Peripheral nerve endoscopy " Dr Ralph Mobbs ' Angle: bf view

-----~-...______-~~-----'- 1005:1-1 Dl5t:al end success of conservative treatment should be borne in mind when deciding whether to

87 operate. In a study of21 patients , neurolysis was successful in 3 out of 10 patients and transection in 9 out of 11. The authors concluded that neurolysis yielded a nonsignificant improvement, in comparison with previous conservative treatment, and transection resulted in a significant improvement.

Surgical Anatomy:

Pelvis

The LFCN has its origin in the lumbar plexus from the 2nd and 3rd lumbar segments.

As its name suggests, it is purely a sensory nerve. The nerve travels downward lateral

to the psoas muscle and crosses the iliacus muscle (deep to the iliac fascia- a dense

layer of fascia). The deep circumflex iliac vessels which course parallel to the

inguinal ligament beneath the iliac fascia, traverse the nerve, as it exists the abdomen.

Thigh

The LFCN then passes either through or underneath the lateral aspect of the inguinal

ligament (Figure 9 .2), and fmally travels to innervate the lateral thigh. It divides into

an anterior and posterior branch and supplies skin on lateral aspect of thigh.

Variations

The anatomy of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve was investigated through

88 dissection of 104 human anatomic specimens by Aszmann et al • The variability of

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 9: Other nerves attempted Page 90 Fi~:l!.l ofvie'N Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs -.. Anglebfvltwt"

..______~_' < =-l::AJ

1. type A, posterior to the anterior superior iliac spine, across the iliac crest (4

percent); ii. type B, anterior to the anterior superior iliac spine and superficial to the origin

of the sartorius muscle but within the substance of the inguinal ligament (27

percent); iii. type C, medial to the anterior superior iliac spine, ensheathed in the tendinous

origin of the sartorius muscle (23 percent); iv. typeD, medial to the origin of the sartorius muscle located in an interval

between the tendon of the sartorius muscle and thick fascia of the iliopsoas

muscle deep to the inguinal ligament (26 percent); v. type E, most medial and embedded in loose connective tissue, deep to the

inguinal ligament, overlying the thin fascia ofthe iliopsoas muscle, and

contributing the femoral branch of the genitofemoral nerve (20 percent).

The results of this study suggest that the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve is most susceptible to mechanical trauma when the nerve is type A, B, or C. In another study

89 by Hospodar , the course of the nerve was variable, but was most commonly found at

10-15 mm :from the ASIS and as far medially as 46 mm :from the ASIS. In no

prosection did the nerve pass lateral to the ASIS (even though historically the nerve is thought to pass lateral to the ASIS in 10% of population).

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 9: Other nerves attempted Page 91 Fielt:! of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy ,. Dr Ralph Mobbs ".Angle of view ------__ ~-~ ~Is': ..______. -- ~--~--" --1

Two types of exposures of the LFCN have been described. In the first type, the incision for the infrainguinal approach is made 3 em below and parallel to the inguinal ligament down to the fascia lata, which is incised in the same direction. The LFCN is exposed medially to the sartorius muscle by blunt dissection of the fascia lata. The nerve is then followed proximally toward the inguinal ligament. In the second type, the incision for the suprainguinal exposure runs 1 em above and parallel to the inguinal ligament. The fascia is incised, and subsequently, the peritoneum is encountered by a muscle-splitting incision. The suprainguinal approach allows accurate identification of the LFCN in its intrapelvic retroperitoneal course. The nerve is followed distally to the inguinal ligament. Either type ofexposure is suitable for neurolysis.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 9: Other nerves attempted Page 92 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs N!gleofvtew

Sites of entrapment:

Figure 9.2: Note the LFCN piercing the ' leaves" of the inguinal ligament

Decision making re suitability:

The question that first needs to be asked: is anatomy reliable enough to expose nerve with a minimally invasive exposure? As can be appreciated from the marked variability ofthis nerve in the thigh, we do not believe that the LFCN offers itself to a minimally invasive exposure and therefore not suitable for endoscopic techniques.

The option of making an incision superior to the inguinal ligament, and then attempting to expose the nerve in a preperitoneal fashion was considered. The problem however is that if the operator uses a pre-peritoneal structural balloon (e.g.:

EPS-400 SpaceSEAL® I 0/11 mm - Extraperitoneal Proximal Separator) to expose the iliac fascia , the surgeon must be comfortable in intrabdominal surgery in addition to nerve surgery.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 9: Other nerves attempted Page 93 Fiela of vie.v Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs ...._ Angle of view ""------"--~o~~~~~J Di~talend Recommendations for clinical application

At this point in time, I do not recommend an endoscopic visualization of the LFCN via either an abdominal or thigh based approach for the treatment of meralgia paresthetica for the following reasons:

1. Size of the nerve. As the nerve is a sensory nerve only, it has a small diameter

and therefore can be very difficult to locate in a minimalist incision.

2. Variation of the anatomy of the nerve.

3. Inconsistent opinions in the literature in regards to the most suitable approach

for this problem.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 9: Other nerves attempted Page 94 flelt! of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs '"' Angle ·of view ..______--~ ----- __ ._l_Axis-----t ': . Distal end Peroneal

The common peroneal nerve is derived from L4-S2 as a part ofthe sciatic nerve.

Entrapment of this nerve usually results in the clinical syndrome of"foot drop".

Operative treatment involves external neurolysis of the common peroneal nerve at the level of the fibular head. The nerve is usually entrapped by thick fibrous bands which arch over the nerve as it crosses the fibular neck. The standard approach for

decompression of this nerve requires a fairly small incision, so a decision was made

early to abandon an endoscopic approach, as there was little to be gained in terms of

limitation of incision and dissection.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 9: Other nerves attempted Page 95 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Distal end Chapter 10: Feasibility of the minimally invasive technique

Outline of chapter:

o Inspection of anatomy on predissected cadavers.

o Attempting exposures on the fresh cadaver.

o "Rules" for suitability.

o List of nerve dissections attempted on the fresh cadaver.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 10: Feasibility of the minimally invasive technique Page 96 _ ..... Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs " Angle of view ------~<=~:!~i~j Distalencl Initial consideration must be given to whether a particular nerve is suitable for the endoscopic technique. Anatomy was first reviewed on prosected specimens with emphasis on potential expandable planes superficial to the nerve trunk. If a nerve was deemed suitable for the technique, an exposure was attempted on the fresh cadaver.

This was important as the fresh cadaver retains some degree oftissue flexibility early after death. During this process, a set of rules was established to divide those nerves that are suitable and those that are not. Clinical application thus far has been attempted on a variety of nerves such as the suprascapular, sciatic and ulnar nerves.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 10: Feasibility ofthe minimally invasive technique Page 97 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

0151:81end Inspection of anatomy on predissected cadavers

Some examples of inspection of anatomy on prosected specimens.

Figure 10.1: Median nerve at the elbow

Figure 10.2: Suprascapular nerve at the suprascapular notch

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 10: Feasibility ofthe minimally invasive technique Page 98 Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Dl5tal end

Figure 10.3: Gluteal specimen demonstrating piriformis muscle and sciatic nerve

Figure I 0.4: Ulnar nerve at the elbow

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 10: Feasibility ofthe minimally invasive technique Page 99 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy , Dr Ralph Mobbs Angle of view

Distal end

Figure 10.5: Radial, PIN and SSRN nerves

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 10: Feasibility ofthe minimally invasive technique Page 100 Fie!d of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy .,. Dr Ralph Mobbs ..... Angle Of vle-.v -----, -~~~=:!~Axi:j Di5tal end Attempting exposures on the fresh cadaver

Performing standard exposures of peripheral nerves on the cadaver is identical to exposing nerves on the living patient in the operating theatre. Most of the cadavers were "fresh" and therefore skin incisions and the use of retractor systems were very similar to normal conditions (Figure 10.1 - 10.5). After a standard incision was performed, an incision that exposed the nerve with as little tissue trauma was undertaken. The incision would also have to be an adequate size to introduce instruments.

Rules for suitability

1. Does the incision conform with a Line of Tension?

2. Does the nerve have reproducable anatomy at a specific location to permit a

minimally invasive exposure.

3. Is patient to fat?

4. Is potential incision directly over a joint?

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 10: Feasibility ofthe minimally invasive technique Page 101 fiela of Vie'N Peripheral nerve endoscopy " Dr Ralph Mobbs "' Angle ofvie-.v ----~ ~=""~~~L~i:j

Figure 10.6: List of nerve dissections attempted on the fresh cadaver

List of nerves examined on each of the 15 cadavers, including initial suitability of the t echn. 1que. Cadaver Was IfNot-why Brachial Ulnar/ Median/ PIN/ SScN/ SScN/ Sciatic Tibial! Sural/ No. cadaver not. Plexus AEL AEL AEL STSL ITSL TTL graft suitable? 1 y B u u u 2 y B u u u u 3 N Excessively fat- initial exposure impossible. 4 N u B u 5 N Cadaver ''too old"-no elasticity of subcutaneous planes. 6 y u B u 7 y u u u 8 y u u u u u 9 y B u u B u u 10 y u u u B u 11 N Excessively fat - initial exposure impossible. 12 y u 13 y u u u u u u 14 y u u u u u 15 y u B

PIN = posterior insteroseous nerve

SScN = suprascapular nerve

STSL = superior transverse scapular ligament. ITSL = inferior transverse scapular ligament. AEL = at elbow level.

TTL = tarsal tunnel level U = Unilateral exposure of nerve.

B = Bilateral exposure of nerve.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 10: Feasibility ofthe minimally invasive technique Page 102 Field ofvieN Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs .., Angl~:ofvle.v" ----_. _ ! .Axis'; ...______---·~ ·~.----.1

Chapter 11: Analysis of Clinical Application

Outline of chapter:

El What are the potential advantages of the technique?

El What are the disadvantages of the technique?

El What pathologies are suitable for the technique?

El Who should perform peripheral nerve endoscopy?

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 11: Analysis of Clinical Application Page 103 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs ... Angle ofvl~1

Di5talend What are the potential advantages of the technique?

The advantages include:

1. Limitation of wound incision size.90

2. Minimization of postoperative scar formation and complications such as

progressive scar entrapment of peripheral nerves and scar contracture over

joints.91

3. Cosmesis.92

4. Reduction ofpostoperative pain due to minimization of skin and subcutaneous

tissue dissection.93

5. Early return to work.94

What are the disadvantages of the technique?

Disadvantages can be summarized under the two headings of safety and time constraints. If a surgeon suggests a new technique for an already established and safe procedure, they must be able to provide evidence that the new procedure is at least as safe as the previous. The issue of time constrains in the hospital system is an important one. There is no doubt the techniques discussed in this report would lengthen the time of any given procedure. The addition time and expense of setting up for endoscopy should be factored into the decision making process. Also, the surgeon would take longer using the endoscopic technique than an open and many surgeons would fmd the "fiddle factor" too annoying and revert to the open procedure.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 11: Analysis of Clinical Application Page 104 --F!e!d of vie.v Peripheral nerve endoscopy " Dr Ralph Mobbs ' Angle Dfvle:-.v ,----~ ---"'=~J-~~j Distal end What pathologies are suitable for the technique?

Nerve entrapment syndromes lend themselves to the technique as a decompressive procedure is usually simple and can be performed using endoscopic guidance. Nerve tumours may be suitable for inspection, however the author is not recommending endoscopy for removal of nerve sheath tumours at this stage. Trauma is an absolute contraindication to nerve endoscopy as the peripheral nerve is usually buried in scar tissue. Development of planes of dissection is difficult and not possible using the endoscopic approach as detailed here. Harvest of sural nerve graft however is a very promising advancement as these patients are usually left with long and painful scars.

Who should perform peripheral nerve endoscopy?

Surgeons who attempt peripheral nerve endoscopy should have at least the following credentials:

1. Well established in peripheral nerve surgery.

2. Can perform an open technique on a particular peripheral nerve with safety

prior to attempting an endoscopic approach.

3. Have some background knowledge of endoscopy (IE: 2D vs. 3D).95

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 11: Analysis of Clinical Application Page 105 F!e!t! of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs .... Angle of view -~------~=~-J~~:J Dif'tal end Chapter 12: Conclusion

Outline of chapter:

o Conclusion.

o Where to from here?

lC7 Will this change the future of peripheral nerve surgery?

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 12: Conclusion Page 106 Field ofvie-N Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs ' Angle ofvlew Lhis: . ----1 Distal end

Conclusion

The aim of the study was to determine whether peripheral nerve exposure can be achieved using minimally invasive endoscopy equipment available in most hospitals.

The study has demonstrated that selective nerve exposures and pathologies are suitable for the novel minimally invasive techniques developed by the author.

Where to from here?

Any new technique should be tested by the rigors of a prospective clinical trial and time. The techniques proposed here are no different and the author is commencing a prospective series to examine the questions of suitability and safety.

Will this change the future of peripheral nerve surgery?

The author will continue to perform the conventional "open" procedures for most patients. In the prospective series, patients will be given the option ofhaving an endoscopic procedure performed. An appropriate consent process will also be required as safety issues are not yet established.

The techniques developed have specialist application and the use would be indicated by patient interest following appropriate consultation and consent.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Chapter 12: Conclusion Page 107 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs -.. Angle Of view

""-----:._~=~ =-!~~i~J Distal end Appendix

Presentation at meetings

Presentations of the techniques described herein have been presented at:

1. The Neurosurgical Society of Australia Annual Meeting (Oct 2002).

2. The Australasian College of Surgeons (May 2003).

3. The Neurosurgical Society of Australia Annual Meeting (Oct 2003).

Video footage on CD-ROM

The attached CD ROM has two videos:

1. Intraoperative suprascapular nerve decompression.

2. Cadaveric peripheral nerve exposures.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum Appendix Page 108 Field ·of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs " Angle of view ~------~ .. ~~~L~~j Distalencl References

1HopfNJ, Grunert P, Fries G, Resch KD, Pemeczky A. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: outcome analysis of 100 consecutive procedures. Neurosurgery. 1999 Apr;44(4):795-804; discussion 804-6. 2 Jones RF, Kwok BC, Stening WA, Vonau M. Third ventriculostomy for hydrocephalus associated with spinal dysraphism: indications and contraindications. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1996 Dec;6 Suppl 1:5-6. 3 Teo C, Jones R. Complications of endoscopic neurosurgery. Childs Nerv Syst. 1996 May; 12(5):248-53; discussion 253. 4 Fukushima T. Endoscopy of Meckel's cave, cisterna magna, and cerebellopontine angle. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 1978 Feb;48(2):302-6. 5 Jho HD, Carrau RL.Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: experience with 50 patients. J Neurosurg. 1997 Jul;87(1):44-51. 6 L'Espinasse VL. Neurological Surgery 2nd Ed. Philladelphia. Lea and Ferbiger: 1943,442. 7 Dandy WE. An operative procedure for hydrocephalus. Bull Johns Hopkins Hospital1922; 33:189-190. 8 Griffith HB. Technique of fontanelle and presutural ventriculoscopy and endoscopic ventricular surgery in infants. Child Brain 1975; 1:359. 9 Fukushima T, Ishijima B, Hirakawa K, Nakamura N, Sano K. Ventriculofiberscope: a new technique for endoscopic diagnosis and operation. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1973 Feb;38(2):251-6. 1°Fukushima T. Endoscopic biopsy of intraventricular tumors with the use of a ventriculofiberscope. Neurosurgery. 1978 Mar-Apr;2(2):110-3.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum References Page 109 Field of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy

Dr Ralph Mobbs " Angle of vlew ' I ..._____ .· --- -.: .l~l~j Distal end

II Scarff JE. Treatment ofhydrocephalus. An historical and critical review of methods and results. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1963; 26: 1. 2 I Vries J. An endoscopic technique for third ventriculostomy. Surg Neurol. 1978 Mar;9(3):165-8. 13 Teo C, Nakaji P, Mobbs RJ. Endoscopic tumour assisted surgery. AANS Absract. 2002 4 I Pemeczky A, Muller-Forell W, van Lindert E, Fries G. Keyhole Concept in Neurosurgery. Thieme, Stuttgart, Germany, 1999

IS Kambin P. Arthroscopic microdiskectomy. Mt Sinai J Med. 1991 Mar;58(2):159- 64. 6 I Mobbs RJ, Nakaji P, Teo C. Endoscopic assisted posterior decompression for spinal metastatic disease. J Clin Neurosci. 2002 Jul 9(4): 13-17. 7 I Mobbs RJ, Teo C. Endoscopic assisted posterior fossa decompression. J Clin Neurosci. 2001 Jul;8(4):343-4.

IS Chow JL Y. Endoscopic release of the carpal ligament: a new technique for carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthroscopy 1989:5(4):19-24. 9 I Agee JM, McCarroll HR, NorthER. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release using the single proximal incision technique. Hand Clin. 1994 Nov;l0(4):647-59. Review. 2°Kux M. Thoracic endoscopic sympathectomy in palmar and axillary hyperhidrosis. Arch Surg 1978;113:264-6. 2 I Bonjer HJ, Hamming JF, duBois NAJJ, van Urk H. Advantages of limited thoracoscopic sympathectomy. Surg Endosc 1996;10:721-3. 22 Fraeze JG, Teo C. Neuroendoscopes and video imaging.Endoscopy of the central and periperal nervous system. W. King Ed. 1st Ed Thieme New York, 1998. 23 Teo C, Rahman S, Boop FA, Cherny B. Complications of endoscopic neurosurgery. Childs Nerv Syst. 1996 May;12(5):248-53; discussion 253. 24 McCulloch JA and Young PH. Essentials of spinal microsugery. Lipponcott. Philladelphia. 1998: 3.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum References Page 110 ...... ". · Fiel.:! of view Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs ".Angle of vit:W ~~J

25 Krayenbuhl H, Yasargil MG. Use of the microscope in surgery of the central nervous system. Praxis. 1968 Feb;57(7):214-7 26 Mobbs RJ. Comparison of the endoscope, microscope and Ioupe magnification to surgical access, surgeon comfort and teaching. Unpublished data, 2001. 27 Guber AE, Muslija A. Miniaturized instrument systems for minimally invasive diagnosis and therapy. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2002;47 Suppl1 Pt 1:198-201. 28 Melder PC, Mair EA. Endoscopic photography: d~gital or 35 mm? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 May;129(5):570-5. 29 Van Veelen MA, NederlofEA, Goossens RH, Schot CJ, Jakimowicz JJ. Ergonomic problems encountered by the medical team related to products used for minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc. 2003 May 6 30 Kronowitz SJ.Endoscopic subcutaneous surgery: a new surgical approach. Ann Plast Surg. 1999 Apr;42(4):357-64. 31 Connolly MW, Torrillo LD, Stauder MJ, Patel NU, McCabe JC, Loulmet DF, Subramanian VA. Endoscopic radial artery harvesting: results of first 300 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Aug;74(2):502-5 32 De Cordier BC, de la Torre JI, Al-Hakeem MS, Rosenberg LZ, Gardner PM, Costa­ Ferreira A, Fix RJ, Vasconez LO. Endoscopic forehead lift: review of technique, cases, and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Nov;l10(6):1558-68 33 Park YL, Han WK., Bae WG. 100 cases of endoscopic thyroidectomy: breast approach. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2003 Feb;13(1):20-5. 34 Yuen EC, So YT.Sciatic neuropathy. Neurol Clin 1999 Aug;17(3):617-31 35 Robert A. Beatty. The Piriformis Muscle Syndrome: A Simple Diagnostic Manoeuvre. Neurosurgery 1994, 34(3): 512 36 Kline DG, Kim D, Midha R, Harsh C, Tiel R. Management and results of sciatic nerve injuries: a 24-year experience. J Neurosurg. 1998 Jul;89(1 ): 13-23. 37 Kline DG, Hudson AR, Kim DH. Atlas of peripheral nerve surgery. WB Saunders1 8tEd: 121-127. 38 Grant GA, Goodkin R, Kliot M. Evaluation and surgical management of peripheral nerve problems. Neurosurgery. 1999 Apr;44(4):825-39

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum References Page 111 FJeld of vie·.v Peripheral nerve endoscopy " Dr Ralph Mobbs "' Angleofvii:'N ------__ ~-_LAxiEi I "------~-~0------.1 DIEitalend

39 Fries G, Pemeczky A. Endoscope-assisted brain surgery: part 2--analysis of380 procedures. Neurosurgery 1998 Feb;42(2):226-31 40 McMinn RHM. Last's Anatomy. 9th Ed. Churchill & Livingston, 1995:p123. 41 Rengachary SS, Burr D, Lucas S, Brackett CE.Suprascapular entrapment neuropathy: a clinical, anatomical, and comparative study. Part 3: comparative study. Neurosurgery 1979 Oct;5(4):452-5 42 Harbaugh KS, Swenson R, Saunders RL. Shoulder numbness in a patient with suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome: cutaneous branch of the suprascapular nerve: case report. Neurosurgery 2000 Dec;47(6):1452-5 43 Romeo AA, Rotenberg DD, Bach BR Jr.Suprascapular neuropathy. JAm Acad Orthop Surg 1999 Nov-Dec;7(6):358-67 44 Pecina M.Who really first described and explained the suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001 Aug;83-A(8):1273-4 45 Adams OR, Schneider RK, Bramlage LR, Easley KJ, Schneider JE. A surgical approach to treatment of suprascapular nerve injury in the horse. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1985 Nov 15;187(10):1016-8 46 Schneider JE, Adams OR, Easley KJ, Schneider RK, Bramlage LR, Peter J, Boero MJ .Scapular notch resection for suprascapular nerve decompression in 12 horses. J Am VetMedAssoc 1985 Nov 15;187(10):1019-20 47 Ludig T, Walter F, Chapuis D, Mole D, Roland J, Blum A. MR imaging evaluation of suprascapular nerve entrapment. Bur Radiol200 1; 11 (11 ):2161-9 48 Sharma RR, Pawar SJ, Netalkar AS. Schwannoma ofthe suprascapular nerve presenting with atypical neuralgia: case report and review of the literature. J Clin Neurosci 2001 Jan;8(1):60-3 49 Cohen SB, Dines DM, Moorman CT. Familial calcification ofthe superior transverse scapular ligament causing neuropathy. Clin Orthop 1997 Jan;(334): 131-5 50 Topper SM.The utility of spine surgery instrumentation in decompression ofthe suprascapular notch. Am J Orthop 1998 Feb;27(2):151-2 51 Romeo AA, Rotenberg DD, Bach BR Jr. Suprascapular neuropathy. JAm Acad Orthop Surg 1999 Nov-Dec;7(6):358-67

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum References Page 112 Fie!&! ofvie

52 Rengachary SS, Burr D, Lucas S, Hassanein KM, Mohn MP, Matzke H. Suprascapular entrapment neuropathy: a clinical, anatomical, and comparative study. Part 2: anatomical study. Neurosurgery 1979 Oct;5(4):447-51 53 Grant GA, Goodkin R, Kliot M.Evaluation and surgical management of peripheral nerve problems. Neurosurgery. 1999 Apr;44(4):825-39 54 Antoniou J, Tae SK, Williams GR, BirdS, Ramsey ML, Iannotti JP. Suprascapular neuropathy. Variability in the diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. Clin Orthop 2001 May;(386): 131-8 55 Dawson D, Hallett M, Wilbourne A. Entrapment Neuropathies. 3rd ed. Lipincott­ Raven, 1999: 123-142 56 Vanderpool DW, Chalmers J, Lamb DW, Whiston TB. Peripheral compression lesions of the ulnar nerve. J Bone Joint Surg 1968, 50B:792-802 57 MacNichol MF. The results of operation for ulnar . J Bone Joint Surg 1979, 61-B(2):159-64 58 Uchida Y, Sugioka Y. Peripheral nerve palsy associated with congenital constriction band syndrome. J Hand Surg [Br] 1991, 16(1):109-12 59 Jones NF, Smith AD, Hedrick MH. Congenital constriction band syndrome causing ulnar nerve palsy: Early diagnosis and surgical release with long-term follow­ up. J Hand Surg [Am] 2001, 26(3):467-73 6°Fahr LM, Sauser DD. Imaging of peripheral nerve lesions. Orthop Clin North Am 1988,19(1):27-41 61 Herrick RT, Herrick SK. Thermography in the detection of carpal tunnel syndrome and other compressive neuropathies. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1987, 12(5):943-9 62 Weinzweig N, Barr A. Radial, ulnar and median nerve palsies caused by a congenital constriction band ofthe arm: single stage correction. Plastic Reconstr Surg 1994, 94(6):872-6 63 Britz GW, Raynor DR, Kuntz C Ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow: correlation of magnetic resonance imaging, clinical, electrodiagnostic, and intraoperative fmdings. Neurosurgery. 1996, 38(3):458-65

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum References Page 113 .- Fie! aof view Peripheral nerve endoscopy " Dr Ralph Mobbs "' Angle 'of view ...______~~=-=!~~l Di5tal encl

64 Ruocco MJ, Walsh JJ, Jackson JP. MR imaging of ulnar nerve entrapment secondary to an anomalous wrist muscle. Skeletal Radiol1998, 27(4):218-21 65 Rosenberg ZS, Bencardino J, Beltran J. MR. features of nerve disorders at the elbow. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1997, 5(3):545-65 66 Nakao Y, Takayama S, Toyama Y.Cubital tunnel release with lift-type endoscopic surgery. Hand Surg. 2001 Dec;6(2):199-203 67 Frey, C. and Kerr, R. 1993. Magnetic resonance imaging and the evaluation of the tarsal tunnel syndrome. Foot and Ankle, 14, (3): 159-164. 68 Mahan, KT., Rock, JJ. and Hillstrom, HJ. 1996. Tarsal tunnel syndrome: A retrospective study. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 86, (2): 81-91. 69 Laing, P. 1995. The painful foot. In Merriman, LM. and Tollafield, DR. (Ed) Assessment ofthe lower limb. Churchill Livingstone, Melbourne: 367-391. 70 Belding, RH. 1993. Neurilemoma of the lateral plantar nerve producing tarsal tunnel syndrome case report. Foot and Ankle, 14, ( 5): 289-291. 71 Richli, WR., Roger, DJ., Carrasco, CH., Charnsangavej, C., Rosenthal, Dl. and Wallace, S. 1993. An anatomical study of the tarsal tunnel using low pressure compartmental infusion. Foot and Ankle, 14, (5): 257-260. 72 Holmes, G.B. 1994. Nerve compression syndromes ofthe foot and ankle. In Gould, JS. (Ed) Operative foot surgery. W.B Saunders Company, Sydney: 184- 191. 73 Boc, SF. and Hatef, J. 1995. Space occupying lesions as a cause of tarsal tunnel syndrome. Journal ofthe American Podiatric Medical Association, 85, (11): 713-715. 74 Jaffe, KA., Wade, JD., Chivers, S. and Siegal, GP. 1995. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma:an unusual presentation as tarsal tunnel syndrome. Foot and Ankle International, 16, (12): 796-799. 75 Stefko, RM. and Lauerman, WC. 1994. Tarsal tunnel syndrome caused by an unrecognized fracture of the posterior process of the talus ( cedell fracture). The Journal ofBone and Joint Surgery, 76-A, (1): 116-118.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum References Page 114 Field ofvie•.v Peripheral nerve endoscopy "' Dr Ralph Mobbs .... Angle ofvit:".v ---- -· -- .. - ~--:)~i~j Di5talend

76 Bailie, DS. and Kelikian, AS. 1998. Tarsal tunnel syndrome:Diagnosis, surgical technique, and functional outcome. Foot and Ankle International, 19, (2): 65-78. 77 Steinbock, G. 1990. Rearfoot Surgery. In Levy, LA, and Hetherington, VJ. (Ed) Principles and practice of podiatric medicine. Churchill Livingstone, Melbourne: 843- 891. 78 Mobbs RJ, Chandran KN. Variation of palmaris longus tendon. Aust N Z J Surg 2000 Jul;70(7):538 79 Daniels, TR., Lau, JT. and Hearn, TC. 1998. The effects of foot position and load on tibial nerve tension. Foot and Ankle International, 19, (2): 73-78. 80 RH Gelberman. JBJS. Vol75-A. 1993: 1854-1878. 81 Cravens-G. Kline-DO. Posterior Interosseous Nerve Palsies. Neurosurgery. 1990. 27. :397-402. 82 Ecker AD, Woltman HW: Meralgia Paraesthetica: A report of one hundred and fifty cases. JAMA. 110:1650-1652, 1938. 83 Williams PH, Trzil KP: Management of meralgia paresthetica. J Neurosurg. 74:76-80, 1991. 84 Hager W. Neuralgia Femoris. Resection des nerv. Cutan. Femoris anterior externus. Dtsch Med. Wochenschr 11; 1885: 218. 85 Roth VK. Meralgia Parasthetica. Med Obozr Med 43; 1895: 678. 86 Kline DG. Comment on "Operative Treatment of Meralgia Paresthetica: Transection versus Neurolysis" Neurosurgery 37(1); 1995: 63 87 van Eerten PV, Polder TW, Broere CAJ .Operative Treatment of Meralgia Paresthetica: Transection versus Neurolysis. Neurosurgery. 1995; 37(1):63 88 Aszmann OC, Dellon ES, Delion AL. Anatomical course of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve and its susceptibility to compression and injury. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997 Sep;100(3):600-4 89 Hospodar PP. Anatomic study of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve with respect to the ilioinguinal surgical dissection. Journal ofOrthop Trauma. 13(1); 1999: 17-19. 90 Munro MG. Laparoscopic access: complications, technologies, and techniques. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Aug;l4(4):365-74.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum References Page 115 Field of viett Peripheral nerve endoscopy Dr Ralph Mobbs

Distalent:l

91 Taylor CO, Green JG, Wise DP. Endoscopic forehead lift: technique and case presentations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996 May;54(5):569-77. 92 Kitamura K, Ishida M, Inoue H, Kinoshita J, Hashizume M, Sugimachi K.Early results of an endoscope-assisted subcutaneous mastectomy and reconstruction for breast cancer. Surgery. 2002 Jan;131(1 Suppl):S324-9. 93 Hindmarsh AC, Cheong E, Lewis MP, Rhodes M. Attendance at a pain clinic with severe chronic pain after open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs. Br J Surg. 2003 Sep;90(9):1152-4. 94 Wang AA, Hutchinson DT, Vanderhooft JE. Bilateral simultaneous open carpal tunnel release: a prospective study of postoperative activities of daily living and patient satisfaction. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2003 Sep;28(5):845-8. 95 Pietrabissa A, Scarcello E, Carobbi A, Mosca F. Three-dimensional versus two­ dimensional video system for the trained endoscopic surgeon and the beginner. Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1994 Dec;2(6):315-7.

Master of Surgery Thesis. Supervisors: Dr Dzung Vu and Dr Peter Blum References Page 116 ALLBOOK BINDERY 91 RYEOALE ROAD WEST RYDE 2114