DOCSLIB.ORG

Moose Lake Community Settlement Agreement 2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Moose Lake Community Settlement Agreement 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. PREAMBLE ARTICLE 1 - AGREEMENT AND INTERPRETATION ..................................................... 4 1.1 AGREEMENT .................................................................................................................. 4 1.1.1 Contents .............................................................................................................. 4 1.1.2 Maps.................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 INTERPRETATION ........................................................................................................ 5 1.2.1 Definitions........................................................................................................... 5 1.2.2 Use of Definitions ............................................................................................. 11 1.2.3 Statutory References......................................................................................... 12 1.2.4 Legislation Speaks from Present....................................................................... 12 ARTICLE 2 - PAYMENT AND COSTS ................................................................................. 13 2.1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 13 2.1.1 Introduction....................................................................................................... 13 2.2 PAYMENT ......................................................................................................................13 2.2.1 Payment............................................................................................................. 13 2.2.2 Application of Payment..................................................................................... 13 2.2.3 No Per Capita Distribution................................................................................ 14 2.2.4 Interest on Late Payment................................................................................... 14 2.3 COSTS.............................................................................................................................. 14 2.3.1 Past Costs, Fees and Contingency Fees ............................................................ 14 2.3.2 Current Costs..................................................................................................... 14 2.3.3 Limitations ........................................................................................................ 14 ARTICLE 3 - EASEMENT LINES AND PROJECT EASEMENTS.................................... 15 3.1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 15 3.1.1 Introduction....................................................................................................... 15 3.2 EASEMENT LINES ....................................................................................................... 15 3.2.1 Establishment of Easement Lines.................................................................... 15 3.2.2 Methodology ..................................................................................................... 15 3.3 SURVEYS ........................................................................................................................ 16 3.3.1 Explanatory Plan of Easement Lines............................................................... 16 3.3.2 Demarcation of Easement Lines...................................................................... 16 3.4 PROJECT EASEMENTS .............................................................................................. 16 3.4.1 Form of Project Easement Agreement........................................................... 16 SCHEDULE 3.1 - PROJECT EASEMENT AGREEMENT ARTICLE 4 - COMMUNITY LANDS .................................................................................... 18 4.1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 18 4.1.1 Introduction....................................................................................................... 18 4.2 INDIVIDUAL SELECTIONS ....................................................................................... 18 4.2.1 Confirmation of Availability of Individual Selections in Part 2 of Schedule 4.1 ..................................................................................................... 18 4.2.2 Issuance of Land Use Permits......................................................................... 19 4.2.3 Use of Individual Selections ........................................................................... 19 4.2.4 Effect of Non-Conforming Use......................................................................... 19 4.2.5 Renewable......................................................................................................... 20 4.2.6 Fees ................................................................................................................... 20 4.2.7 Land Use Permits subject to Lawful Use by Hydro....................................... 20 4.2.8 Request for Transfer in Fee Simple .................................................................. 20 4.2.9 Individual Selection in Part 4 of Schedule 4.1 ................................................ 20 4.2.10 Condition of Land Use Permit ........................................................................ 20 4.2.11 Parcel not to be Transferred in Fee Simple....................................................... 20 4.2.12 Non-Approval of Individual Selection............................................................ 21 4.3 LAND USE PERMIT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SITE ...................... 21 4.3.1 Issuance of Land Use Permit........................................................................... 21 4.3.2 Renewable......................................................................................................... 21 4.3.3 Fees ................................................................................................................... 21 4.3.4 Land Use Permits Subject to Lawful Use of Lands by Hydro....................... 21 4.3.5 Request for Transfer in Fee Simple .................................................................. 21 4.4 SURVEYS AND PROCESS FOR TRANSFER........................................................... 22 4.4.1 Surveys.............................................................................................................. 22 4.4.2 Water Boundary of Parcels ............................................................................... 22 4.4.3 Water Boundary of Lands Subject to Project Easement................................. 23 4.4.4 Water Boundary of Lands not Subject to Project Easement............................. 23 4.4.5 Registration of Transfer of Title ....................................................................... 23 4.4.6 Reservations to Manitoba ................................................................................ 23 4.4.7 Costs of Surveys and Transfers......................................................................... 23 4.4.8 Costs Chargeable............................................................................................... 24 4.5 USE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SITE ...................................................... 24 4.5.1 Use of Community Development Site............................................................ 24 4.5.2 Application for Use by Individuals................................................................... 24 4.5.3 Content of Application...................................................................................... 24 4.5.4 Authorization of Use......................................................................................... 24 4.5.5 Cancellation of Authorized Use........................................................................ 24 4.5.6 Reversion .......................................................................................................... 25 SCHEDULE 4.1 - COMMUNITY LANDS SCHEDULE 4.2 - FORM OF LAND USE PERMIT SCHEDULE 4.3 - SURVEY INSTRUCTIONS SCHEDULE 4.4 - FORM OF COUNCIL RESOLUTION ARTICLE 5 - FOREBAY COMMUNITY SITE ..................................................................... 26 5.1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 26 5.1.1 Introduction....................................................................................................... 26 5.2 FOREBAY COMMUNITY SITE.................................................................................. 26 5.2.1 Description of Area........................................................................................... 26 5.2.2 Establishment of Residences and Infrastructure ............................................... 26 5.2.3 Forebay Community Site................................................................................ 26 5.2.4 Continued Use and Occupation of the Forebay Community Site .................. 26 5.2.5 Release by Mosakahiken of Claim to Forebay Community Site.................. 26 5.2.6 Indemnity .......................................................................................................... 27 SCHEDULE 5.1 - FOREBAY COMMUNITY SITE SCHEDULE 5.2 - PARAGRAPH 18.2.1(b) OF THE MOSAKAHIKEN COMPREHENSIVE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wallace Mining and Mineral Prospects in Northern
    r Geology V f .ibrary TN 27 7A3V/1 WALLACE MINING AND MINERAL PROSPECTS IN NORTHERN MANITOBA THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES University of British Columbia D. REED LIBRARY The RALPH o DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ,-XGELES, CALIF. Northern Manitoba Bulletins Mining and Mineral Prospects in Northern Manitoba BY R. C. WALLACE PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF GOVERNMENT OP MANITOBA OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER OF NORTHERN MANITOBA The Pas, Manitoba Northern Manitoba Bulletins Mining and Mineral Prospects in Northern Manitoba BY R. C. WALLACE PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF GOVERNMENT OF MANITOBA OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER OF NORTHERN MANITOBA The Pas, Manitoba CONTENTS Chapter Page I. Introductory 5 II. Geological features ... 7 III. History of Mining Development 12 IV. Metallic Deposits: (A) Mineral belt north of The Pas .... 20 (1) Flin Flon and Schist Lake Districts. .... ....20 (2) Athapapuskow Lake District ..... ....27 (3) Copper and Brunne Lake Districts .....30 (4) Herb and Little Herb Lake Districts .... .....31 (5) Pipe Lake, Wintering Lake and Hudson Bay Railway District... 37 (B) Other mineral areas .... .....37 V. Non-metallic Deposits 38 (a) Structural materials 38 (ft) Fuels 38 (c) Other deposits. 39 VI. The Economic Situatior 40 VII. Bibliography 42 Appendix: Synopsis of Regulations governing the granting of mineral rights.. ..44 NORTHERN MANITOBA NORTHERN MANITOBA Geology Library INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTORY Scope of Bulletin The purpose of this bulletin is to give a short description of the mineral deposits, in so far as they have been discovered and developed, in the territory which was added to the Province of Manitoba in the year 1912.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Geology Compilation Map Series: Grand Rapids NTS
    Manitoba Industry, Trade and Mines Geological Survey MARGINAL NOTES B.G.C.M. Series Grand Rapids, NTS 63G, 1:250 000 The Grand Rapids map sheet (NTS 63G) is underlain by Paleozoic carbonate formations, with the QUATERNARY exception of minor Precambrian bedrock exposures in the northeast corner. The Paleozoic strata Pervasive glacial erosion carved the Grand Rapids area into an outcrop-dominated landscape. Sediment O O represent a portion of the northeastern flank of the Williston Basin and dip gently to the southwest. Recent 100 0 O 98 0 4 000 ’ 0 ’ 0 5 000 cover is restricted to the south along The Pas Moraine and, most likely, to the area north of Lake 50 30 99 0 30 50 glaciation has modified the exposed Paleozoic bedrock. The rocks outcrop in a region known as the O O Interlake, and the Grand Rapids area is where many of Manitoba's caves and karst features are located. Winnipeg, where peatlands dominate. No information is available within the area regarding preLate 54 0 54 0 LEGEND ISOPACH MAPS STRUCTURE CONTOUR MAPS SML Wisconsinan glaciation, although multiple glacial striations and discontinuous older sediments may be SA N The map sheet is blanketed by up to 60 m of glacial till, lake sediments and glacial outwash deposits (see SA present. SA 'Surficial Geology' and 'Overburden Thickness' inset maps). The north basin of Lake Winnipeg occupies N Little Playgreen WESTERN CANADA SEDIMENTARY BASIN McMartin (2000) documented two late Wisconsinan glacial advances in the Flin Flon area, first towards SML Lake a significant portion of the sheet.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Diefenbaker: the Prairie Jewel
    Journal of Great Lakes Research 41 Supplement 2 (2015) 1–7 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Great Lakes Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jglr Lake Diefenbaker: The prairie jewel Introduction with intakes that are 34 m below FSL. The proportion of inflowing water that flows out of Gardiner Dam varies from ~70% in low flow years (e.g., 2001 average flow was 84 m3 s−1)toover97%inhigh fl 3 −1 Fighting drought with a dam: Lake Diefenbaker, the reservoir of ow years (e.g., 2005; 374 m s ; Hudson and Vandergucht, 2015) fl life-giving water.CBC's Norman DePoe. with a median proportional out ow of ~94%. Additional water losses in- clude net evaporation, which can represent over 10% in dry years, irriga- On the broad expanse of flat land of the northern Great Plains of tion, and direct use from the reservoir. From the Qu'Appelle Dam, Lake Canada lies a large, narrow, river-valley reservoir, Lake Diefenbaker. Diefenbaker water is transferred out of the natural catchment and re- The reservoir was developed for multiple benefits including the irriga- leased down the Qu'Appelle River to supply southern regions of the tion of ~2000 km2 of land in Central Saskatchewan, the generation of province. With a mean depth of 22 m, the water residence time, though hydroelectricity, a source of drinking water, flood control, water for in- variable, is typically just over a year (Donald et al., 2015; Hudson and dustry and livestock, and recreation. This semi-arid region has an aver- Vandergucht, 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright © November 2018 Erin Yaremko
    Failed Partnership to Future Partnership: An Examination of Social Impacts Moving from Institutional Failure to Partner with Indigenous Communities to a New Model of Partnership A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba In partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of History University of Manitoba Winnipeg Copyright © November 2018 Erin Yaremko 0 Acknowledgement of Treaty Territory and Positionality I acknowledge that I reside and work on treaty 1 and treaty 5 territory, the traditional territories of the Anishinaabeg (Ojibway), Muskeko-ininiwak (Cree), Dakota and Nakota peoples, and the homeland of the Red River Métis Nation. As a settler descendant I acknowledge the continuation of modern colonial barriers First Nations continue to face, and am consciously aware of the white privilege I carry. I commit myself to building reciprocal partnerships and alliances to further the growth of the Indigenous perspective in historical source. I come to this research and work with anticolonial, anti-racist world views and commit myself to furthering my own personal growth and understanding of Indigenous methodology and world views through continual alliance with each Nation I am fortunate to partner with. My early upbringing through inner city volunteer positions and further work in areas of social justice facilitated the growth of my passion for social justice-based research and work in partnership with other cultural groups. Past work in partnership with the Japanese Canadian based project Landscapes of Injustice helped foster my understanding of large social justice- based research projects. Work in partnership with the Japanese Manitoban and Japanese Saskatchewan communities furthered my understanding of colonization in Canada and the trauma caused by western society.
    [Show full text]
  • NOR-MAN Regional Health Authority 2009/2010 Community Health Assessment Report
    NOR-MAN Regional Health Authority Community Health Assessment Report April 2010 Principal Authors: Catherine Hynes, Regional Manager Decision Support Susan Lockhart, Executive Director of Planning, Research & Development Jamie Simard, Decision Support - Administrative Data Entry / Programmer Dr. Lawrence Elliott, Medical Officer of Health NOR-MAN Regional Health Authority 84 Church Street Flin Flon, Manitoba R8A 1L8 Telephone: (204) 687-1338 Fax: (204) 687-6405 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.norman-rha.mb.ca A Message from Vivian McKenzie Board Vice-Chair A Message to the Region In accordance with Section 23(2B) of the Regional Health Authorities Consequential Amendment Act, I am pleased to present, on behalf of the Board of Directors of the NOR-MAN Regional Health Authority, a copy of NOR-MAN Regional Health Authority’s 2009/2010 Community Health Assessment. Over one year ago, the NOR-MAN Regional Health Authority Board of Directors appointed the NRHA Community Health Assessment Advisory Committee to complete a comprehensive Community Health Assessment for the region. Building on the work that has been done since the RHA’s inception in 1997 and NRHA’s second comprehensive Community Health Assessment completed in 2004, the goal of the project was to provide a solid base of facts and data to guide future decision-making in the region. Both the Community Health Assessment process and report will assist the NOR-MAN Regional Health Authority’s planning process and form the basis for the development of our NRHA’s 2011 - 2016 Strategic Plan. We hope you find the information useful and we encourage our community partners to use the information for your own planning purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Manitoba, Canada
    2019 REGIONAL TRAVEL GUIDE NORTH MB Manitoba, Canada north.travelmanitoba.com Digital. Agile. Transformative. Our people leverage data and technology to solve problems and build a better tomorrow. Vale.com NORTHERN MANITOBA It is a region of the province that is vast and Going back thousands of years, Indigenous mostly untouched, where the waterways have people thrived off this land – its fauna and flora carved their place through the rocks and providing the necessities for survival. With arrival the forests provide refuge to an abundance of the Europeans in 1612 and the development of wildlife. But for those who seek a deeper of the fur trade, Manitoba’s North and its connection, they’ll find the land holds Indigenous people paved the way for a thriving the stories of Indigenous people and the enterprise in commerce that would influence communities here shine with the legends the entire history of the province. The next wave of the past and the potential of the future. of explorers to hit the North were prospectors, Northern Manitoba is a region that stretches as this ancient landscape held treasures from the 53rd parallel to the northern border beneath its surface. Towns were established with Nunavut and the shores of Hudson Bay. and populations grew as mining was a top The landscape here shifts from the coniferous industry for decades. Today, the communities forests of the Canadian Shield, to muskeg – have diversified and are welcoming visitors to boggy land characterized by surface water discover their unique charms and proximity to and slowly decomposing plants – to tundra, incredible wilderness and natural settings.
    [Show full text]
  • Rags to Riches”
    “RAGS TO RICHES” Leo Pettipas Manitoba Archaeological Society At the height of the last Ice Age around 18,000 years ago, all of Manitoba was covered by an ice cap some 1,200 metres thick. The weight of this massive burden pushed the underlying land surface downward, in much the same way that the surface of a cushion will sink when someone sits on it. Eventually, the ice sheet began to melt, and by about 7,500 years ago, it had all but disappeared from Manitoba. At first, the melting was especially rapid around the southern margins of the glacier; the last area to become ice-free was the North country around Hudson Bay. In other words, the southern portions of the province became ice-free first, and more and more of the land was released from the pressure of the ice as its edge melted ever northward and the glacier got smaller and smaller over time. The disappearance of the ice sheet gave rise to a process that scientists refer to as “crustal rebound.” Ever since it became free of its glacial burden, the surface of the earth’s crust in the North has been “rebounding” upward toward its original, pre-glacial elevation – just as the cushion will rise upward to its original height after the person gets up off it. Crustal rebound had a strong influence on the natural and human history of the major lakes and rivers that inherited the region from the now-extinct Lake Agassiz. For example, after that great lake disappeared, the Saskatchewan River flowed into Cedar Lake, just as it does now.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Economic Risk Assessment of the Presence of Zebra Mussel in Lake Winnipeg, Red River, Nelson River and Cedar Lake
    ___ Socio-Economic Risk Assessment of the Presence of Zebra Mussel in Lake Winnipeg, Red River, Nelson River and Cedar Lake FINAL REPORT Policy and Economics Central and Arctic Region April 28, 2017 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Objectives of the Study ............................................................................................................................. 2 Organization of the Study ......................................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 1: A Brief Overview of the Study Area ............................................................................................ 4 Socio-Demographic Profile ....................................................................................................................... 4 A Brief Overview of Lake Winnipeg .......................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 2: Methodology Adopted ................................................................................................................ 7 Data Sources ............................................................................................................................................. 8 Scope of the Study ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Bar L. Hereford Ranch Moose Creek, MB November 22, 1961
    7 Bar L. Hereford Ranch Moose Creek, MB November 22, 1961 I am more or less forced to write a story for our 25 grandchildren who keep me busy answering questions all day long. Riding down the river in the Skippy L, sitting up front on the barge watching the river go by, or just sitting out in the alfalfa fields watching a bunch of calves lying down with a couple of nurse cows looking after them. These kids just keep on asking questions. They are as bad as our own boys and girls for wanting to know about long ago. Why they called that long point Graves Point, who named Shoulder Blade Island, and why they call the lake across the portage Traders’ Lake. Jennie and I are not going away for a trip this winter they way we generally do, so I will start this story. Our ranch house here is very warm and comfortable. Old Henry Campbell, a good Indian that never went to school, has been the ranch manager for many years. I don’t know where he got the name Campbell. Some Hudson Bay clerk long ago might be able to tell us. We have official word from the Hydro Board to vacate here by 1963. The Grand Rapids dam will put six feet of water over all our alfalfa, brome, and clover fields. We have some 1500 acres in tame hay and thousands of acres of lovely pasture fields. Our trading post is three miles away. Moose Creek that runs out of Moose Lake is open all winter, making a good dividing line for our cattle.
    [Show full text]
  • The Saskatchewan River Delta Project
    PRELIMINARY SOIL SURVEY OF THE SASKATCHEWAN RIVER DELTA PROJECT 10. ""4 .._ "'41 HUOIOH. _. REGINA. ..." un", 00" ". ...... 4"1~ 101... SASKATCHEWAN INSTITUTE OF PEDOLOGV UNIVERSITV OF SASKATCHEWAN, SASKATOON AND GOVERNMENT OF SASKATCHEWAN DEPARTM£NT OF AGRICULTURE CONIERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 'RANCH RUINA Preliminary Soil Survey of the Saskatchewan River Delta Project Saskatchewan Institute of Pedology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, and the Conservation and Development Branch, Saskatchewan Department of Agriculture, Regina. 1967 Saskatchewan Institute of Pedology Publication SPl 1967 Preliminary Soil Survey of the Saskatchewan River Delta Project By J.G. Ellisl and D. Graveland2 assisted in the Field Work By (D.F. Acton, K. Ayres, A. Barth, R. Button, L. Crosson, J.L. Henry, K. Head, J.A. Shields and H.B. Stonehouse)l Laboratory Work By p.C. Chang3 with Cartography By D.F. Actonl and K. Ayresl Distributed by the Conservation and Development Branch, Saskatchewan Department of Agriculture, Regina. 1 Saskatchewan Institute of Pedology, Saskatoon. 2Conservation and Development Branch, Regina. 3 Canada Department of Agriculture, Vauxhall, Alberta. Table of Contents Page Soil Surveys of the Delta Area 1950-1963 ................ 1 Method of Survey .. ........ 4 General Description of the Area . 0 .0.... 5 Physiography . ...0 00 ...0 00...... 6 Climate ...0 08 0. 0 00 00.. 8.'" 9 Vegetation 0.. ... "00" ... "'0"00"08 80080" 800 8. "00" 13 Peat ..080080 0 O. 80 80 0 08 O. 0 80. 15 Soils ... .00 0..00'.00.. 0 ..0 00 80 O' 15 Soils of the Lowlands ... 0... .0 00 ... 000...0.... 16 Soils on the Levees 0 0..0..00.
    [Show full text]
  • Ondatra Zibethicus) in Response to Water Level Management at the Summerberry Marsh Complex, the Ap S, Manitoba, Canada Michael David Ervin Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2011 Population characteristics and habitat selection of muskrats (Ondatra zibethicus) in response to water level management at the Summerberry Marsh Complex, The aP s, Manitoba, Canada Michael David Ervin Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Ervin, Michael David, "Population characteristics and habitat selection of muskrats (Ondatra zibethicus) in response to water level management at the Summerberry Marsh Complex, The as,P Manitoba, Canada" (2011). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 11970. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/11970 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Population characteristics and habitat selection of muskrats (Ondatra zibethicus) in response to water level management at the Summerberry Marsh Complex, The Pas, Manitoba, Canada By Michael Ervin A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Program of Study Committee: William R. Clark, Major Professor David Otis Steven Jungst Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2011 Copyright © Michael Ervin, 2011. All rights reserved. ii Table of Contents: LIST OF TABLES v LIST OF FIGURES viii CHAPTER 1: GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1 Introduction 1 Thesis Organization 15 References 16 CHAPTER 2: POPULATION TRENDS AND PHYSIOLOGICAL 22 RESPONSES OF MUSKRATS (Ondatra zibethicus) TO WATER LEVEL MANIPULATION AT THE SUMMERBERRY MARSH COMPLEX, THE PAS, MANITOBA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Saskatchewan River Basin, Canada
    THE SASKATCHEWAN RIVER BASIN, CANADA: A GEOGRAPHICAL APPRAISAL OP THE WATER RESOURCES DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By CRAIG DUNCAN, BS A., M. A. The Ohio State University 1955 Frontispiece The mountains: Peyto Lake and the Mistaya Valley, North Saskatchewan Basin PREFACE The economic potentialities of semiarid regions are considerably enhanced if the meager supply of precipitation is supplemented by water from other sources. The writer obtained an appreciation of both the possibilities and the problems associated with surface water use as a result of a study of Irrigation farming in the rain shadow area of southern New Zealand. In 1951 his interest in the use of the water resource was further stimulated after traveling across the rain shadow area of the Prairie Provinces, Canada* The three major cities through which he passed are located on important tributaries of the Saskatchewan River. Dams across the upper Bow River provide both storage and head for hydroelectric generation. An area of intensive farming, centering on Lethbridge, Alberta, contrasts with the grazing lands of the high plains and the dry-farmed cropland of the western lowlands. Irrigation ditches parallel the fences in the area between Lethbridge and Taber. Beyond, the land is sterile. A few beef cattle are grazed on vast expanses of steppe grassland. At Medicine Hat the author learned of plans to bring water from the west to serve these dry lands* Many of the problems of the Prairie Provinces are associated with the lack of water.
    [Show full text]