DOCSLIB.ORG

The Darwin Conspiracy Origins of a Scientific Crime

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Darwin Conspiracy Origins of a Scientific Crime The Darwin Conspiracy Origins of a Scientific Crime ROY DAVIES 2008 Contents Preface xi Acknowledgements xiii Introduction xv The Story 1 Windfall 1 2 The man who stretched time 5 3 Formation of a naturalist 10 4 Emperor’s clothes 19 5 The chemist from Tooting 23 6 The sting 33 7 New kid with a net 39 8 A land bridge too far 51 9 New law from Sarawak 57 10 Silence gentlemen, please 64 11 Unwelcome discovery 66 12 Warning shots 70 13 Darwin without a compass 74 14 Wallace and divergence 78 15 A black box in Cambridge 85 16 Crossroads 88 17 Out of the blue 93 18 Changing course 98 19 Most unlucky man 100 20 The collector’s life 102 21 Land bridges connect 106 22 Enter a sceptic 113 23 An insurance policy 123 24 Evolution solved 129 25 Animal trails 135 26 Wallace’s first letter 139 27 A second letter 141 28 The third letter 145 29 Checkmate 149 30 End of a conspiracy 156 31 Aftermath 161 The Background Cast of characters 167 Glossary 170 Appendices and References Appendix 1: Darwin and Wallace: timeline of ideas, 1831–1862 173 Appendix 2: Southampton – Malay Archipelago Shipping Schedule 1857–1858 176 Appendix 3: Route map of mail steamers in the Dutch East Indies in the late 1850s 178 Appendix 4: On the Tendency of Varieties to depart indefinitely from the Original Type 179 Notes and sources Notes 189 Bibliography 195 Index 201 Preface DURING the 1980s, as Editor of the BBC history series Timewatch,I commissioned a documentary idea about Charles Darwin which had been brought to me by one of my producers. The film portrayed Darwin as a nervous man who concealed the secret of how species originate for more than twenty years, until he was forced to publish when he realised someone else might get there before him. The programme was called The Devil’s Chaplain. It was well made with high production values and reflected well on everyone involved. In 1996, having left the BBC, I was approached by an independent television producer who was convinced that I had told the wrong story: that there was a story not even hinted at in the Timewatch programme. Today, having researched the Darwin record for myself and having been utterly convinced by what I have learned, I believe that she was absolutely right and that the original programme (which went out under my name) left a great deal of new information about Darwin unmentioned. If I had known then what I know now, The Devil’s Chaplain would never have been made. What you are about to read is the story leading up to the discovery of the origin of species, which I would eagerly have transmitted in its place. Roy Davies London February 2008 Acknowledgments MY DEBT to Paul Hannon is not easily quantifiable – for his enthusiasm, generosity and his determination in the pursuit of evidence; also to Dilys Allam, then at the publishers Taylor & Francis, for her belief, commit- ment and energy at a crucial time; George Beccalonni for honest appraisal, constant interest and a shared belief in the importance and genius of Alfred Russel Wallace; Jim Moore for excellent advice offered despite obvious misgivings; Andrew Berry for recognising a gap in Darwin studies and for offering the encouragement and personal introduction which gave me the confidence to complete the work; Janet Browne for making time in a hectic relocation between London and Harvard to talk to me about ideas, Wallace and Edward Forbes; Harry Dean for his open- mindedness in changing from initial sceptic to enthusiast and for his continuing encouragement and advice throughout; Femme Gaastra whose knowledge and expertise has illuminated with absolute certainty the shipping schedules between the Malay Archipelago and England in the mid-nineteenth century; Matthew Davies and Eugene Weber whose comments and suggestions helped in so many ways; Elin Rhys of the Welsh television company Teledu Telesgop who with a mixture of encouragement, challenge and humour sustained the development of this book in the dark days when many were absorbed by the pitch but so few felt the need to make it visual; and finally my editor Rowan Davies who turned a difficult concept into an infinitely more accessible manuscript. I wish also to recognise the help given me by the late Colin Paterson of the Natural History Museum in London who was prepared to listen when I needed it most, who read the earliest outline without hesitation though we had never previously met, and who liberated Dov Ospovat’s book from the Museum’s bookshop as he passed it a few moments before our first meeting, and to John Langdon Brooks, who also died during the research stage of this book, who criticised and helped after reading my initial attempts at a summary of this story and who gently warned of the obstacles I was likely to face further down the road. Others have been continually generous with their time, help and advice especially Gina Douglas and her colleague Lynda Brooks at the xiv The Darwin Conspiracy library of the Linnean Society and members of staff of the Zoological Library of the Natural History Museum. I am also indebted to the Cambridge University Press for permission to publish extracts from The Correspondence of Charles Darwin and to the Syndics of Cambridge University Library for their own permission to use extracts from their archive and for their timely decision to make Darwin’s correspondence accessible online. The Linnean Society generously gave permission to publish extracts from the journals and notebooks of Alfred Russel Wallace as did the American Philosophical Society regarding Darwin’s letters to Sir Charles Lyell. Finally I would like to thank the many other publishers who allowed extracts from their authors’ books to be used as material evidence in the structuring of this story. Introduction IN THE mid-nineteenth century, Great Britain boasted two scientists who were to change forever the way mankind viewed the world. Despite their individual gifts, they were as unlike as any two men of ideas could possibly be. One was rich, privileged, highly educated and connected to important families in Victorian society; the other worked for a living, had no significant social connections and left school at the age of fourteen. The first, after years of hunting and shooting, became conventional and dutiful, and bore the weight of expectation willingly; the other, self- taught, was instinctive, radical, free-thinking, open and unbound by convention throughout his life. The older figure, following a long voyage of wonder in his young manhood, married, bred a large family, inherited substantial wealth and invested wisely, but afterwards rarely travelled far from his home in rural Kent in the southeast of England. The younger, who had no thoughts of marriage, roamed, often alone, the rainforests of the Amazon basin and modern Malaysia and Indonesia. One was brought up to believe in and respect the Christian Church (and even, at one time, to consider it as a career), while the other had no time for its dogma and paralysing power over the minds of men. Of one, Charles Darwin, you will most certainly have heard. Of the other, Alfred Russel Wallace, you may well have heard nothing. One hundred and fifty years ago, after exhausting feats of research, observation and analysis, both men were acknowledged by their peers to be considered joint discoverers of the theory of evolution. At that time, the stranglehold of religion on Victorian society was such that only brave or foolish people rejected its teaching and its authority. Along with everyone else, both men were expected to accept without question that everything in the world was the work of a knowing, ever-present, all-powerful God. The Church told people how to act, what to think, when to work and when to rest. The influence of the Church had not always been this great. In former times, philosophers, artists and wise men, from Ancient Greece to Renais- sance Europe, had pondered how the incredible variety of forms of life they saw around them might have been produced. Some came within xvi The Darwin Conspiracy touching distance of what we now know as the theory of evolution. However, although many argued for the fact of evolution, none could indicate exactly how it happened. The theory of natural selection has been defined as ‘a bias acting within a species which promotes the survival of some variants and not others thus making for a change within the species’.1 The statement is lucid and simple, but the solution to the essential question – how does that initial bias become so magnified that it can cause change? – eluded many of the greatest thinkers for more than two thousand years. Ideas of causal factors swung between the work of a Creator and nature’s inherent patterning. Empedocles, Aristotle, Epicurus, Lucretius, Gregory of Nyssa, St. Augustine, Avicenna and Leonardo da Vinci had all offered their thoughts before Francisco Suárez (1548–1617), a Spanish Jesuit priest writing after the Moors had been banished from Spain, attempted to put an end to secular speculation and declared that every form of life was created by God, and remained unchanged until it became extinct. He also insisted that no living organism could mutate into another form. Suarez’s doctrine became the official policy for the Christian Church, and was a direct cause of the strict orthodoxy that was still in place at the beginning of the nineteenth century. In the intervening centuries, Francis Bacon (1561–1626), René Descartes (1596–1650) and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646–1716) all favoured natural causes for species change, before Carl Linnaeus (1707– 1778) insisted that species are created by God, and are forever fixed and unchanging.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Edward Blyth
    2012 VOL 6 ISSUE 3 pre-independence Special section: mammalogists SUBSCRIBEcontents NOW! Annual subscription rates for Current Coservation are asphotofeature given. Please note that cheques and demand 19 ROBERT ARMITAGE STERNDALE drafts should be in favour of Dakshin Foundation. DEEPTHI CHIMALAKONDA 03 DESERT FOX Dakshin Foundation 20 THOMAS CAVERHILL JERDON A 001, Samvriddhi Gardenia Apartments ARJUN SRIVATHSA, JOHN MATHEW 88/3special Bytaranyapur section:a pre-inde- Near Sahakar Nagar A block 22 WILLIAM THOMAS BLANFORD Bangalorependence 560 092 mammalogists JOHN MATHEW India. Tel +91GUEST 80 11112 EDITORS: 34567 BHANU SRIDHARAN, AJITH 24 GEORGE EDWARD DOBSON KUMAR, JOHN MATHEW SUMAN JUMANI To suscribe online, visit our website www.currentconservation.or04 Introduction to earlyg mammalogists 26 ROBERT CHARLES WROUGHTON JOHN MATHEW VISHNUPRIYA S For any queries, write to [email protected] 28 REGINALD INNES POCOCK portraits SAPNA JAYARAMAN 09 THOMAS HORSFIELD 31 EDWARD PRITCHARD GEE AMOD ZAMBRE UDDIPANA KALITA SOUTH ASIA INDIVIDUAL12 BRIAN HOUGHTONRS. 200 HODGSON 32 STANLEY HENRY PRATER INSTITUTIONALSHASHANK DALVI RS. 500 VANJULAVALLI SRIDHAR AFRICA,15 THOMAS ASIA, LATIN HARDWICKE AMERICA INDIVIDUALASHWIN VISWANATHAN US $ 10 on book stands : INSTITUTIONAL US $ 25 16 EDWARD BLYTH 34 Major mammal book published AUSTRALIA,BHANU SRIDHARAN EUROPE, JAPAN, NORTH AMERICA J W DUCKWORTH INDIVIDUAL US $ 10 Cover illustration: William Thomas Blanford (1832-1905) INSTITUTIONAL US $ 25 The magazine is produced with support from: Current Conservation carries the latest in research news from natural and social science facets of conservation, such as conservation biology, environmental history, anthropology, sociology, ecological economics and landscape ecology. For more details, visit our website at www.currentconservation.org editor’s note Kartik Shanker South Asia photo feature Desert Fox Vulpes vulpes, Little Rann of Kutch 3 At first glance, an issue on pre-independence mammalogists seems neither current E U 2 1 ISS 20 6 L nor about conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Did Darwin Plagiarize His Evolution Theory? — Bergman
    Countering the critics Did Darwin plagiarize his evolution theory? — Bergman this book de Maillet Did Darwin suggested that fish were the precursors of birds, mammals, plagiarize his and men.7 Yet an- other pre-Darwin evolution theory? scientist was Pierre- Louis Maupertuis Jerry Bergman (1698–1759) who in 1751 concluded in his Some historians believe that all of the major contri- book that new species butions with which Darwin is credited in regard to may result from the Courtesy TFE Graphics Courtesy evolution theory, including natural selection, actually fortuitous recombin- were plagiarized from other scientists. Many, if not ing of different parts most, of Darwin’s major ideas are found in earlier of living animals. works, especially those by his grandfather Erasmus At about this Darwin. Charles Darwin rarely (if ever) gave due same time the French credit to the many persons from whom he liberally encyclopedist, Denis Erasmus Darwin (1731–1802) ‘borrowed’. This review looks at the evidence for Diderot (1713–1784), this position, concluding that much evidence exists taught that all animals evolved from one primeval organ- to support this controversial view. ism. This prototype organism was fashioned into all those types of animals alive today via natural selection. George Louis Buffon (1707–1788) even expounded the idea at length that ‘the ape and man had a common ancestry’ and, A common (but erroneous) conclusion is that Charles further, that all animals had a common ancestor.8 Macrone Darwin conceived modern biological evolution, including concluded that, although Darwin put evolution on a firmer natural selection.1 An example of statements commonly scientific basis found in the scientific literature indicating this would be the ‘ … he was hardly the first to propose it.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Blyth, Charles Darwin, and the Animal Trade in Nineteenth-Century India and Britain
    Journal of the History of Biology 30: 145±178, 1997. 145 c 1997 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Edward Blyth, Charles Darwin, and the Animal Trade in Nineteenth-Century India and Britain CHRISTINE BRANDON-JONES 11 York Road London SW11 3PX England Introduction Early professionals in the natural sciences found great dif®culty in establish- ing their social level and a steady income.1 The pursuit of science ± unlike other professions, such as law or medicine ± did not overcome low status, nor did it confer high status. Naturalists also differed from other professionals in that their profession did not usually generate income through fees: they required salaried employment, which in itself diminished their social standing. There was still the assumption that scientists were gentlemen of independent income. This resulted in the pitiful salaries that forced practitioners to take on more than one position, or to accept socially degrading side employment. Many naturalists, such as William Swainson, Alfred Russel Wallace, Henry Bates, John Gould, and Edward Blyth, found it necessary to supplement a scanty income with mercantile activities. Victorian society generally frowned on such activities and they could be easily held against a social marginal scien- tist on his uppers. This state of affairs led Edward Forbes to complain bitterly: ªPeople without independence have no business to meddle with science. It should never be linked with lucre.º2 This paper will illustrate the problems faced by early professional natural- ists, and the way in which they were forced to make a living, by examining the animal trading of the zoologist Edward Blyth, curator of the museum of 1 David Elliston Allen, ªThe Early Professionals in British Natural History,º in From Lin- naeus to Darwin: Commentaries on the History of Biology and Geology, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Darwinian Revolution: Rethinking Its Meaning and Significance
    The Darwinian revolution: Rethinking its meaning and significance Michael Ruse1 Department of Philosophy, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306 The Darwinian revolution is generally taken to be one of the key (a perhaps undeserved) reputation of a 3-h sermon by a Pres- events in the history of Western science. In recent years, however, byterian minister on a wet Sunday in Scotland. the very notion of a scientific revolution has come under attack, Against this, however, one can point out that the history of and in the specific case of Charles Darwin and his Origin of Species science as a professional discipline is little more than 50 years old there are serious questions about the nature of the change (if there and that you have to start somewhere. In the case of Darwin, was such) and the specifically Darwinian input. This article consid- even 30 years ago there was no real synthesis. The tragedy would ers these issues by addressing these questions: Was there a have been if historians of science had stopped there and gone no Darwinian revolution? That is, was there a revolution at all? Was further. But this is clearly not true. In the past 30 years or more, there a Darwinian revolution? That is, what was the specific staying just with the history of evolutionary thinking, there has contribution of Charles Darwin? Was there a Darwinian revolu- been a huge amount of work on people before and after Darwin, tion? That is, what was the conceptual nature of what occurred on and on his contemporaries like Thomas Henry Huxley [for and around the publication of the Origin? I argue that there was instance, Desmond (4)].
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Darwin's Debt to Malthus and Edward Blyth JOEL S
    Charles Darwin's Debt to Malthus and Edward Blyth JOEL S. SCHWARTZ Department of Biological Sciences Staten lsland Community College of the Oty University of New York Staten Island, New York INTRODUCTION The traditional view of Darwin's development of the theory of natural selection is that Darwin was inspired to formulate his theory by reading Mathus' Essay on Population. 1 According to a different notion, Darwin overemphasized his debt to Mathus regarding natural selection in order to hide the impact of other writers, in particular Edward Blyth, on his own thinking. 2 The purpose of this paper is to examine these conflicting ideas about the history of Darwin's thinking in the development of the theory of natural selection. By focusing on three basic questions, I will attempt to determine the relative merit of both positions. Was Edward Blyth's work an important prelude to Darwin's theory of natural selec- tion? Was Darwin aware of Blyth's work before he read Malthus? How strongly was Darwin influenced by Mathus? EDWARD BLYTH Edward Blyth (1810-1873) was an extraordinary naturalist, a per- sistent observer of nature, and a reader of books about zoology.3 He was neither wealthy nor particularly healthy and in 1841 left England for the more salubrious climate of India, where he was offered the position of Curator of the Museum of the Royal Society of Bengal. Although Blyth continued his activity there and became recognized as the founder of zoology in India, what is relevant to this paper is the 1. Charles C. Gillispie, The Edge of Objectivity: An Essay in the History of Scientific ldeas (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1960); Marius J.
    [Show full text]
  • Letters to Charles Darwin from Edward Blyth at Calcutta- a Study in the Process of Discovery
    "Notes for Mr. Darwin": Letters to Charles Darwin from Edward Blyth at Calcutta- A Study in the Process of Discovery BARBARA G. BEDDALL 2502 Bronson Road Fairfwld, Connecticut I What think you of Wallace's paper in the Ann. N. Hist? . Has it at all unsettled your ideas regarding the persistence of species .... Edward Blyth to Charles Darwin, 8 December 1855 x Edward Blyth, curator of the museum of the Asiatic Society of Bengal in Calcutta, had been corresponding with Charles Darwin in England for upwards of a year when he hurriedly wrote out for Darwin a lengthy commentary on a paper that had recently come to his attention. Little did he know that this same paper, "On the Law Which Has Regulated the Introduc- tion of New Species," written by his fellow Englishman, Alfred Russel Wallace, and published in September of 1855, marked a milestone not only for Wallace himself, but for Darwin and for Sir Charles Lyell as well. ~ From a series of propositions relating to geological and geographical distributions, Wallace had deduced that "every species has come into existence coincident both in space and time with a pre-existing closely allied species." z Evolution was clearly implied, although Wallace had not yet worked out a mechanism. Both Blyth and Lyell called Darwin's attention to the paper, and it was at this time that Darwin revealed his theory of natural selection to Lyell, who urged him to publish it. But Darwin, reluctant to put out a brief and unsupported 1. Barbara G. Beddall, "Wallace, Darwin, and Edward Blyth: Further Notes on the Development of Evolution Theory," J.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2020
    Contents Monthly Bulletin, DeCeMBeR 2020 FromtheDeskoftheGeneralSecretary 3 TulikaSen(08May1926-18October2020) 4 Rumjhum Ray Chaudhuri Bird’s-eyeviewofanArtistandArtHistorian 6 Isha Mahammad and Somnath Mukherjee SirWilliamJonesontheStudyofBirds 10 Arun Bandopadhyay BirdsandtheirConnoisseurs,asRevealedintheAnnalsofthe Journal of The Asiatic Society of Bengal (1832 -1843) 13 Tapati Mukherjee EdwardBlyth:TheUnrivalledOrnithologistandCuratorofTheAsiaticSociety 18 Nibedita Ganguly PreviewofArticlesPublishedonOrnithologicalStudiesinthe Journal of The Asiatic Society of Bengal from1870to1879 21 Basabdutta Chanda îûyöì?w¡y¡!ôöìeîûþ›y!‡îû?ˆê/ !î!î™yíÅ ¤‚@ýÌ¥é 27 ߺþ›lî¤% ForgottenIndianOrnithologist–Dr.SatyaCharanLaw 32 Asok Kanti Sanyal BirdsinIndianArt:AntiquityandImportance 34 Keka Adhikari Banerjee OrnithologicalRepresentationsinIndianArchaeology:ABriefOutline 38 Anuja Bose TheMindofBirds 43 Debashis Banerjee and Anindita Banerjee পাখির দেশে 47 অ쇁ণ 嗁মার চক্রব쇍釀 PreservingAvifaunalDiversityinSantragachiJheel,Howrah,WestBengal,India 50 Advay Mishra BirdsofEastCalcuttaWetlandsandErstwhileMarshySaltLakes 54 Asok Kanti Sanyal BirdsCapturedthroughLensfromSaltLake(Banabitan) 56 Soumitra Chakraborty ReportonReleaseofanAlbumofBirdsintheCollectionofTheAsiaticSociety 60 Sagarika Sur BirdsfromtheArtists’Gallery 63 Anuradha Bysack / Kanchan Pathak / Sagarika Sur / Sneha Agarwal / Rajkumar Mukherjee / Rekha Chakraborty / Arun Kumar Chakraborty BooksfromReader’sChoice 67 সুজা쇍া খমশ্র/ Basabdutta Chanda RareBooksonBirdsintheCollectionofTheAsiaticSociety(ArrangedinChronologicalOrder)
    [Show full text]
  • Darwin. a Reader's Guide
    OCCASIONAL PAPERS OF THE CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES No. 155 February 12, 2009 DARWIN A READER’S GUIDE Michael T. Ghiselin DARWIN: A READER’S GUIDE Michael T. Ghiselin California Academy of Sciences California Academy of Sciences San Francisco, California, USA 2009 SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Alan E. Leviton, Ph.D., Editor Hallie Brignall, M.A., Managing Editor Gary C. Williams, Ph.D., Associate Editor Michael T. Ghiselin, Ph.D., Associate Editor Michele L. Aldrich, Ph.D., Consulting Editor Copyright © 2009 by the California Academy of Sciences, 55 Music Concourse Drive, San Francisco, California 94118 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. ISSN 0068-5461 Printed in the United States of America Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas 66044 Table of Contents Preface and acknowledgments . .5 Introduction . .7 Darwin’s Life and Works . .9 Journal of Researches (1839) . .11 Geological Observations on South America (1846) . .13 The Structure and Distribution of Coral Reefs (1842) . .14 Geological Observations on the Volcanic Islands…. (1844) . .14 A Monograph on the Sub-Class Cirripedia, With Figures of All the Species…. (1852-1855) . .15 On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (1859) . .16 On the Various Contrivances by which British and Foreign Orchids are Fertilised by Insects, and on the Good Effects of Intercrossing (1863) . .23 The Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species (1877) .
    [Show full text]
  • List of Biologists
    Scientist Birth-Death Country Humayun Abdulali (1914–2001), Indian ornithologist Aziz Ab'Saber (1924–2012), Brazilian geographer, geologist and ecologist Erik Acharius (1757–1819), Swedish botanist Johann Friedrich Adam (18th century–1806), Russian botanist Arthur Adams (1820–1878), English physician and naturalist Henry Adams (1813–1877), English naturalist and conchologist William Adamson (1731–1793), Scottish botanist (abbr. in botany: Aiton) Michel Adanson (1727–1806), French naturalist (abbr. in botany: Adans.) Monique Adolphe ( born 1932), French cell biologist Edgar Douglas Adrian (1889–1977), British electrophysiologist, winner of the 1932 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his research on neurons Adam Afzelius (1750–1837), Swedish botanist Carl Adolph Agardh (1785–1859), Swedish botanist Jacob Georg Agardh (1813–1901), Swedish botanist Louis Agassiz (1807–1873), Swiss zoologist Alexander Agassiz (1835–1910), American zoologist, son of Louis Agassiz Nikolaus Ager (1568–1634), French botanist Pedro Alberch i Vié (1954–1998), Spanish naturalist Bruce Alberts ( born 1938), American biochemist, former President of the United States National Academy of Sciences Nora Lilian Alcock (1874–1972), British pioneer in plant pathology Boyd Alexander (1873–1910), English ornithologist Horace Alexander (1889–1989), English ornithologist Richard D. Alexander ( born 1930), American evolutionary biologist Wilfred Backhouse Alexander (1885–1965), English ornithologist Alfred William Alcock (1859–1933), British naturalist Salim Ali (1896–1987),
    [Show full text]
  • THE RISE of the EVOLUTION FRAUD (An Exposure of the Conspiracy) by Malcolm Bowden (Second Enlarged Edition)
    THE RISE OF THE EVOLUTION FRAUD (An exposure of the conspiracy) by Malcolm Bowden (Second Enlarged Edition) SOVEREIG PUBLICATIOS, P.O. BOX 88 92 BROMLEY COMMO BROMLEY KET BR2 9PF i Copyright © M. Bowden 2008 Copyright Whilst copyright of the text and illustrations are retained by the author, short passages may be quoted and any of the illustrations may be copied without charge or obtaining permission, provided that for each item used the title and the author are acknowledged. As well as this book, this applies to all other works by this author, i.e Ape-men - Fact or Fallacy, Science vs. Evolution, True Science agrees with the Bible and the co-authored book Breakdowns are Good for you. Important ote For current information on the purchase of all books, postage etc. go to - www.mbowden.info. [email protected] ISB 0-9506042-7-5 EA 9780950604275 First Edition 1982 Second Enlarged Edition 2008 Published by Sovereign Publications, Box 88 92 Bromley Common, Bromley, Kent, BR2 9PF, UK Typeset using Greenstreet Publisher 4.01P UK Front cover designed using Xara Extreme Printed by Biddles DEDICATIO This second enlarged edition, is, like the first, dedicated to my wife - who bore the brunt. Acknowledgments I would here like to record my thanks to Dr. Stephen Hayes for proof reading this work, making several useful suggestions, and encouraging me to complete it. .................................. "Instead of a fact we have a speculative hypothesis that says that living species evolved from ancestors which cannot be identified, by some much-disputed mechanism which cannot be demonstrated, and in such a manner that few traces of the process were left in the fossil record - even though that record has been interpreted by persons strongly committed to proving evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Darwin, Edward Blyth, and the Theory of Natural Selection Author(S): Loren C
    Charles Darwin, Edward Blyth, and the Theory of Natural Selection Author(s): Loren C. Eiseley and A. Grote Source: Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 103, No. 1 (Feb. 28, 1959), pp. 94-158 Published by: American Philosophical Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/985383 . Accessed: 24/10/2013 12:44 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Philosophical Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 150.135.118.112 on Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:44:27 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions CHARLES DARWIN, EDWARD BLYTH, AND THE THEORY OF NATURAL SELECTION LOREN C. EISELEY Professorof Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania CONTENTS voyage of the Beagle. On her deck, impatient PAGE for the sight of home was a tall, spare young I. Introduction.............................. 94 man with the brooding eyes of a philosopher. II. Edward Blyth............................. 96 He had looked much upon savage men and III. Clues to Darwin's knowledge of Blyth........ 97 animals in remote uncharted lands. What he IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Nietzsche and Darwin Babette Babich Fordham University, [email protected]
    Fordham University Masthead Logo DigitalResearch@Fordham Hermeneutic and Phenomenological Philosophies Working Papers of Science 2013 Nietzsche and Darwin Babette Babich Fordham University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://fordham.bepress.com/phil_papers Part of the Evolution Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, Intellectual History Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons Recommended Citation Babich, Babette, "Nietzsche and Darwin" (2013). Working Papers. 4. https://fordham.bepress.com/phil_papers/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Hermeneutic and Phenomenological Philosophies of Science at DigitalResearch@Fordham. It has been accepted for inclusion in Working Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalResearch@Fordham. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nietzsche and Darwin Babette Babich As a natural scientist however, one should get out of one’s human corner. … in nature it is not distress which rules but abundance, squandering, indeed to the point of senselessness. The struggle for survival is only an exception, a temporary restriction of the will to life; the great and small battles turn around us on preponderance, on growth and expansion, on power, corresponding to that will to power that is indeed the will of life. — Nietzsche, The Gay Science, §349 At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break will then be rendered wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.
    [Show full text]