Rockcliffe-Smythe Residents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rockcliffe-Smythe Residents West Toronto Local Collaborative Priority Area: Rockcliffe Smythe – Focus on Chronic Diseases and Access to Primary Care May 26, 2017 Contents 1. Rockcliffe Smythe background and methodology/considerations/limitations of this deep dive analysis 2. Overall Emergency Department and Acute Inpatient Utilization for Selected Chronic Conditions for Rockcliffe-Smythe residents 3. ED and Acute Inpatient Utilization for Individual Selected Chronic Conditions for Rockcliffe-Smythe residents 4. Patient Journey for Residents with ED Visits, Health Links and Home Care Referrals and Use 5. Primary Care Attachment, Access and Continuity for Rockcliffe-Smythe Residents 6. Community providers serving Rockcliffe-Smythe residents (CBI) 7. Appendix a) Diagnostic codes for the selected chronic conditions 2 West Toronto Sub-Region – Rockcliffe-Smythe Neighbourhood 3 Rockcliffe-Smythe – Background information on chronic conditions identified through previous data review and consultations Previous analyses showed that Rockcliffe-Smythe: Was one of the 4 neighborhoods in the northwest corner with a high prevalence of chronic diseases (Diabetes, Asthma, high blood pressure and COPD) Had high rate of seniors (ages 65+) living alone (36.8%), High Proportion of immigrants (51.0%) High rate of individuals with no knowledge of English or French (6.3%), Second highest marginalization rate in the West sub-regions and a high rate of persons living below low income measure (after-tax) (23.1%), It is a City of Toronto designated Neighborhood Improvement Areas (NIA) Discussions with working group requested information on ED visits, admissions, primary care attachment data and information on high needs Toronto Community Housing buildings. Comments from Providers Could tailor a strategy similar to that being done in Mount Dennis There is a need for communicating the availability of services, particularly for new Canadians and immigrants that don’t speak English or French Encouraging more coordination with preventative efforts linked to the social determinants of health Coordination of services are needed for vulnerable populations, including housing and transportation There should be more engagement of community members and patients in future planning discussions. 4 Methodology and Limitations of Analysis Several Data Sources were used for this analysis: 1. Toronto Central LHIN utilization data on emergency department visits (NACRS) and acute inpatient discharges (DAD) with a focus on chronic conditions. This data was based on identifying the number of ED visits and discharges for the postal codes in the neighborhood. • 10 chronic conditions (Arthritis, Asthma, CHF, COPD, Diabetes, Hypertension, IHD, Stroke, Mental Health and Addictions) that had been identified by the Ministry as relevant for Health Links. See ICD codes for ED visits and Inpatient hospitalizations in Appendix. For inpatient analysis, MH and addictions were excluded. • Analysis for the chronic conditions focused on adults 20+ as these conditions are more prevalent in adults, with the exception of COPD where we used population 35 years and over. • Data are broken down by age groups and sexwhere possible 2. Attachment and continuity data was also included from Ontario Community Health Profiles Partnership 3. Integrated Decision Support (IDS) data was used to explore the patient journey for Rockcliffe-Smythe residents with ED visits due to chronic conditions who were were Health Links patients, and those with CCAC referrals in 2015/16. 4. Community Business Intelligence (CBI) data was used to identify a small group of top HSPs in the neighborhood. A list of top HSPs that serve 50% of the clients Rockcliffe Smythe neighbourhood is provided (this gives the top 4 to 6 CMHA HSPs and the top 1 or 2 CSS HSPs). However, it should be noted that most HSPs are serving small numbers in each neighbourhood, so this is just a fraction5 of the total HSPs involved in the neighbourhood. Key Highlights and Summary of All Findings Overall, Emergency Department Utilization for Selected Chronic Conditions, FY 2015/16: • Of the total 9,886 ED visits by Rockcliffe-Smythe residents, 1,489 were for the 10 selected chronic conditions for target population of 20 years and older (35+ for COPD). This represented 1,066 unique visitors. High rate of multi-morbidity: • 51 (5%) individuals had more than one chronic condition • 460 (43%) individuals who had a visit for a chronic condition also had a visit for a non-chronic conditions • Arthritis was the most common condition (671 ED visits) followed by mental health (261) and Addictions (140). IHD had the lowest number of visits (34). • The majority of ED visits for the select chronic diseases were severe (CTAS 2 & 3) with Ischemic Heart Disease and Congestive Heart failure having the highest proportion of CTAS 2 • CHF, cancer and stroke had the highest proportion of admitted visits. • Arthritis, addictions, asthma and hypertension had the highest proportion of visits discharged home without supports • Proportion of those reporting having a primary care provider varied from 65% for Addictions related ED visits to 92% for Diabetes related ED visits • Majority of the patients visited St. Joseph’s Health Centre (35%), followed by Humber River Regional Hospital – Church Street Site (18%) and Humber River Hospital – Wilson Site (14%) . Overall, Acute Inpatient Utilization for Selected Chronic Conditions, FY 2015/16: • Of the 2,049 acute inpatient discharges for Rockcliffe-Smythe residents, 433 were due to the 8 selected chronic conditions as the most responsible diagnosis, representing 336 unique individuals. High rate of multi-morbidity: • 17 (5%) individuals had more than one chronic condition • 79 (24%)individuals who had a discharge for a chronic condition also had a discharge for one or more non-chronic conditions • Cancer had the highest number of discharges (63) followed by Arthritis (53). Hypertension had the lowest (5). • Discharges due to cancer had the longest length of stay (LOS) ( 9.3 days) while asthma had the shortest (2.8 days) • Cancer had the longest ALC LOS with an average stay of 8 days. 6 Key Highlights and Summary of all Findings continued Characteristics for Selected Conditions Arthritis- Age groups 40-64 and 20-39 had highest number of ED visits, mainly males. Highest proportion (28%) of CTAS 4 and 5 among the conditions. Acute inpatient discharges were more among older female adults and seniors. 13% of patients had repeat ED visits while only 1% of those discharged had a repeat admission. Mental Health – Adults 20-39 years, mainly males, had highest number of ED visit. 55% of visits were CTAS 3. 18% had repeat ED visits Addictions – ED visits most prevalent among males 20-39 and females 40-64. Only 10% of ED visits were CTAS 4 and 5. Relatively high rate of repeat ED visits (17%). Cancer – higher number of ED visits in 40-64 and 75+ age group, mainly males. Nearly Two-thirds of visits were CTAS 3. Cancer had the highest number of admissions among the selected conditions, with the same age groups having the highest numbers of discharges.14% of patients with repeat ED had repeat visits and 19% of those admitted having repeat admissions. Heart Disease- ED visits more prevalent in older females 75+. Majority of ED visits for CHF are for CTAS 2 and 17% of patients had 2 or more visits due to CHF. Diabetes- Adults 20-64, mainly males , had the highest proportion of ED visits and acute admissions. .Majority of ED visits are CTAS 3. Lower proportion have repeat ED visits (7%). COPD – Mainly in males 75+. 16% of patients had 2 or more ED visits due to COPD Patient Journey for those with Chronic Conditions, FY2015-16 • Of the total 6,582 ED visits for Rockcliffe-Smythe residents captured in IDS, 7% (488) were for identified Health Links clients. • As expected there was a higher proportion of Health Links clients among the group with chronic conditions (251 or 23%) compared to the 4% in the group without chronic conditions 7 Key Highlights and Summary of all Findings continued Access to Primary Care and Continuity for Rockcliffe-Smyth Residents • West Toronto has the lowest number and per capita rate of primary care providers among the 5 sub-regions • Rockcliffe-Smythe has 10 primary care physicians located in the neighborhood, the majority of whom are in fee-for- service practices • The physicians are organized in 6 practices with one being a CHC • Rockcliffe-Smythe was among the top 3 neighborhoods with the lowest levels of primary care continuity (i.e. highest proportion of low continuity) in West Toronto sub-region (together with Mount Dennis and New Toronto) in 2013/14- 14/15. Distribution of High needs population in Rockcliffe-Smythe • The western part of Rockcliffe-Smythe neighborhood has among the highest concentration of high heathcare cost users in FY2013/14 – FY2014-15. • Nearly all of Rockcliffe-Smythe neighborhood has among the highest concentration of SAMI scores indicating an expected number of primary care visits that is higher than normal . 8 Overall Emergency Department and Acute Inpatient Utilization for Selected Chronic Conditions for Rockcliffe-Smythe residents National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS), FY2015-16 Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) –FY2015-16 9 Emergency Department Visits for Rockcliffe-Smythe Residents, 2015/16 • During 2015/16, there were 9,886 visits to the Emergency Department (ED) by residents of Rockliffe-Smythe • 145 visits did not have a valid health card number • 7,772 were for individuals 20 years and
Recommended publications
  • Progress on the Rexdale – Casino Woodbine Community Benefits
    Attachment 9: Employment and Labour Market Advisory Working GroupEX11.1 Terms of 2 Reference Preamble Ontario Gaming GTA LP (OGGLP or "the Partnership") is committed to ensuring the Woodbine renewal is a force for positive change in the GTA – particularly for nearby neighbourhoods and for residents who are at a social or economic disadvantage. To this end, the Partnership has designed a 20-year Employment and Labour Market Plan that will align with the City’s ongoing work and exceed the Partnership’s already-strong practices across Canada to create thousands of high-quality jobs, establish valuable skills training programs, and facilitate equitable access to the unique opportunity afforded by redevelopment. Based on extensive discussions with City Staff and other stakeholders, the core of the Partnership’s Employment and Labour Market Plan is a collaborative approach to strengthening the employment pathway for local residents and equity-seeking groups. The Partnership’s core strength as a private sector job creator is hiring, training, and upskilling team members, with redevelopment and enhanced operations leading to increased labour market demand. Meanwhile, a strong cluster of City and social sector organizations are primarily focused on identifying, strengthening, and supporting a pool of candidates, with a focus on local residents, youth, and disadvantaged groups. When each player in this employment ecosystem is helping to build and strengthen program alignment, this plan will help to ensure that supply and demand connect. Through the Employment and Labour Market Advisory Working Group, OGGLP will work with the City of Toronto and key stakeholders in order to monitor inputs and outcomes and receive feedback that will allow its plans to be measured and strengthened.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbourhood Equity Scores for Toronto Neighbourhoods and Recommended Neighbourhood Improvement Areas
    Appendix B Neighbourhood Equity Scores for Toronto Neighbourhoods and Recommended Neighbourhood Improvement Areas All Scores are out of a maximum 100 points: the lower the Score, the higher the level of total overall inequities faced by the neighbourhood. Neighbourhoods with Scores lower than the Neighbourhood Equity Benchmark of 42.89 face serious inequities that require immediate action. Neighbourhoods marked with "*" in the Rank column were designated by Council as Priority Neighbourhood Areas for Investment (PNIs) under the 2005 Strategy. For neighbourhoods marked with a "+" in the Rank column, a smaller portion of the neighbourhood was included in a larger Priority Neighbourhood Areas for Investment designated by Council under the 2005 Strategy. Neighbourhood Recommended Rank Neighbourhood Number and Name Equity Score as NIA 1* 24 Black Creek 21.38 Y 2* 25 Glenfield-Jane Heights 24.39 Y 3* 115 Mount Dennis 26.39 Y 4 112 Beechborough-Greenbrook 26.54 Y 5 121 Oakridge 28.57 Y 6* 2 Mount Olive-Silverstone-Jamestown 29.29 Y 7 5 Elms-Old Rexdale 29.54 Y 8 72 Regent Park 29.81 Y 9 55 Thorncliffe Park 33.09 Y 10 85 South Parkdale 33.10 Y 11* 61 Crescent Town 33.21 Y 12 111 Rockcliffe-Smythe 33.86 Y 13* 139 Scarborough Village 33.94 Y 14* 21 Humber Summit 34.30 Y 15 28 Rustic 35.40 Y 16 125 Ionview 35.73 Y 17* 44 Flemingdon Park 35.81 Y 18* 113 Weston 35.99 Y 19* 22 Humbermede 36.09 Y 20* 138 Eglinton East 36.28 Y 21 135 Morningside 36.89 Y Staff report for action on the Toronto Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy 2020 1 Neighbourhood Recommended
    [Show full text]
  • Vertical Files
    Bloor/Gladstone Branch Local History Collection Vertical File Subject Headings Architecture Biography - General Biography - Denison Family Biography - Givins Family Biography - Neilson Family Biography - Shaw Family Brandon-Primrose Area Brockton Churches - Alphabetical Churches - General Churches - St. Anne's City Planning - Bloor/Dufferin City Planning - Brock Planning District City Planning - Dovercourt Park Area City Planning - Dufferin Grove Area City Planning - Dundas/Dufferin City Planning - Lionstar (1970 proposed development) City Planning - Wallace Emerson Crime Dovercourt Village Dufferin Mall Dufferin Race Track Elections - General Family Life Festivals Galleries & Museums Garrison Creek Geological Features Gore Vale Hotels & Taverns Houses - by Street Name Housing Industry - Pollution Industry & Commerce Libraries - Bloor/Gladstone Library Libraries - College/Shaw, Runnymede, Dufferin/St. Clair Maps - 1979 -- Maps - Electoral Divisions Oral History - No File (Bloor/Dufferin interviews transferred to TPL Archives) Parkdale Parks Parks - Dufferin Grove Park Police Politics & Government Population Population - Black Community Population - Italian Community Population - Jewish Community Population - Multiculturalism Population - Portuguese Community Postal Service Protestant Orphans' Home Schools - General Information Schools - Bishop Marrocco Schools - Bloor Collegiate Schools - Brock Ave School Schools - Brockton High School Schools - Central Commerce High School Schools - Christie Public School Schools - Dewson Public School
    [Show full text]
  • City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average Price by Percentage Increase: January to June 2016
    City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average price by percentage increase: January to June 2016 C06 – $1,282,135 C14 – $2,018,060 1,624,017 C15 698,807 $1,649,510 972,204 869,656 754,043 630,542 672,659 1,968,769 1,821,777 781,811 816,344 3,412,579 763,874 $691,205 668,229 1,758,205 $1,698,897 812,608 *C02 $2,122,558 1,229,047 $890,879 1,149,451 1,408,198 *C01 1,085,243 1,262,133 1,116,339 $1,423,843 E06 788,941 803,251 Less than 10% 10% - 19.9% 20% & Above * 1,716,792 * 2,869,584 * 1,775,091 *W01 13.0% *C01 17.9% E01 12.9% W02 13.1% *C02 15.2% E02 20.0% W03 18.7% C03 13.6% E03 15.2% W04 19.9% C04 13.8% E04 13.5% W05 18.3% C06 26.9% E05 18.7% W06 11.1% C07 29.2% E06 8.9% W07 18.0% *C08 29.2% E07 10.4% W08 10.9% *C09 11.4% E08 7.7% W09 6.1% *C10 25.9% E09 16.2% W10 18.2% *C11 7.9% E10 20.1% C12 18.2% E11 12.4% C13 36.4% C14 26.4% C15 31.8% Compared to January to June 2015 Source: RE/MAX Hallmark, Toronto Real Estate Board Market Watch *Districts that recorded less than 100 sales were discounted to prevent the reporting of statistical anomalies R City of Toronto — Neighbourhoods by TREB District WEST W01 High Park, South Parkdale, Swansea, Roncesvalles Village W02 Bloor West Village, Baby Point, The Junction, High Park North W05 W03 Keelesdale, Eglinton West, Rockcliffe-Smythe, Weston-Pellam Park, Corso Italia W10 W04 York, Glen Park, Amesbury (Brookhaven), Pelmo Park – Humberlea, Weston, Fairbank (Briar Hill-Belgravia), Maple Leaf, Mount Dennis W05 Downsview, Humber Summit, Humbermede (Emery), Jane and Finch W09 W04 (Black Creek/Glenfield-Jane
    [Show full text]
  • Trailside Esterbrooke Kingslake Harringay
    MILLIKEN COMMUNITY TRAIL CONTINUES TRAIL CONTINUES CENTRE INTO VAUGHAN INTO MARKHAM Roxanne Enchanted Hills Codlin Anthia Scoville P Codlin Minglehaze THACKERAY PARK Cabana English Song Meadoway Glencoyne Frank Rivers Captains Way Goldhawk Wilderness MILLIKEN PARK - CEDARBRAE Murray Ross Festival Tanjoe Ashcott Cascaden Cathy Jean Flax Gardenway Gossamer Grove Kelvin Covewood Flatwoods Holmbush Redlea Duxbury Nipigon Holmbush Provence Nipigon Forest New GOLF & COUNTRY Anthia Huntsmill New Forest Shockley Carnival Greenwin Village Ivyway Inniscross Raynes Enchanted Hills CONCESSION Goodmark Alabast Beulah Alness Inniscross Hullmar Townsend Goldenwood Saddletree Franca Rockland Janus Hollyberry Manilow Port Royal Green Bush Aspenwood Chapel Park Founders Magnetic Sandyhook Irondale Klondike Roxanne Harrington Edgar Woods Fisherville Abitibi Goldwood Mintwood Hollyberry Canongate CLUB Cabernet Turbine 400 Crispin MILLIKENMILLIKEN Breanna Eagleview Pennmarric BLACK CREEK Carpenter Grove River BLACK CREEK West North Albany Tarbert Select Lillian Signal Hill Hill Signal Highbridge Arran Markbrook Barmac Wheelwright Cherrystone Birchway Yellow Strawberry Hills Strawberry Select Steinway Rossdean Bestview Freshmeadow Belinda Eagledance BordeauxBrunello Primula Garyray G. ROSS Fontainbleau Cherrystone Ockwell Manor Chianti Cabernet Laureleaf Shenstone Torresdale Athabaska Limestone Regis Robinter Lambeth Wintermute WOODLANDS PIONEER Russfax Creekside Michigan . Husband EAST Reesor Plowshare Ian MacDonald Nevada Grenbeck ROWNTREE MILLS PARK Blacksmith
    [Show full text]
  • D Dakota, the 225 Davenport Road Toronto Dearbourne Court 46 Dearbourne Blvd
    D Dakota, The 225 Davenport Road Toronto Dearbourne Court 46 Dearbourne Blvd. Brampton Discovery Place 1400 The Esplanade North Pickering Discovery Place 1890 Valley Farm Road Pickering Discovery Place II 1880 Valley Farm Road Pickering District Lofts 388 Richmond Street West Toronto Domus 3 McAlpine Street Toronto Dorchester, The 150 Farnham Avenue Toronto Dunhill Club, The 95 Prince Arthur Avenue Toronto Dynasty 20, 30, 40 Harding Blvd. Richmond Hill Dynasty Tower 5460 Yonge Street Toronto E East Hamptons 189-195 Lake Driveway West Ajax Eaton Valley 15 Martha Eaton Way Toronto Elegance 65 Skymark Drive Toronto Ellington, The 7 Carlton Street Toronto Emerald Place 1655, 1665 Pickering Pkwy. Pickering Emmett House 85 Emmett Avenue Toronto Empire Plaza 33 University Avenue Toronto Empress Plaza 35 Empress Avenue Toronto Empress Plaza II 18 Hillcrest Avenue Toronto Enfield Place 265, 285 Enfield Place Mississauga Esplanade, The 25 The Esplanade Toronto F Fairways, The 1400 Dixie Road Mississauga 5 Parkway Forest Towers 5 Parkway Forest Drive Toronto 43 Eglinton Ave. E. 43 Eglinton Avenue East Toronto G Gallery, The 25 Grenville Street Toronto Gates of Guildwood 20 Guildwood Pkwy. Toronto Gates of Guildwood S 10 Guildwood Pkwy. Toronto Gazebo 8111 Yonge Street Markham Gibraltar 22 Clarissa Drive Richmond Hill Gibraltar II 32 Clarissa Drive Richmond Hill Gloucester Gates 30 Gloucester Street Toronto Gooderham Court 30 Church Street Toronto Gotham Lofts 781 King Streeet West Toronto Governor's Hill 3800 Yonge Street Toronto Granary, The 100 Lakeshore Road East Oakville Grand Harbour 2285, 2287, 2289 Lakeshore Blvd. West Toronto Granite Gates 1800 The Collegeway Mississauga Granite Place 61, 63 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Canopy Study 201
    IE11.1 - Attachment 2 Tree Canopy Study 201 Prepared by: KBM Resources Group Lallemand Inc./BioForest Dillon Consulting Limited 8 With Special Advisors Peter Duinker and James Steenberg, Dalhousie University 2018 Tree Canopy Study Consulting Team Lallemand Inc./BioForest Allison Craig, MFC John Barker, MFC KBM Resources Group Rike Burkhardt, MFC, RPF Ben Kuttner, PhD, RPF Arnold Rudy, MScF Dillon Consulting Limited David Restivo, HBSc, EP John Fairs, HBA Sarah Galloway, HBES Merrilees Willemse, HBA, MCIP, RPP Dalhousie University (Special Advisors) Peter Duinker, PhD James Steenberg, PhD Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the field crews, who recorded the i-Tree data used to generate many of the findings in this report: Lallemand Inc./BioForest: Ahmad Alamad, Laura Brodey, George Chen, Jessica Corrigan, Aurora Lavender, Julia Reale Dillon Consulting Ltd: Trevor Goulet Our thanks go to the City of Toronto Steering Committee members who provided valuable insight and expertise. Daniel Boven, Acting Manager Beth McEwen, Manager Forestry Policy and Planning Forest & Natural Area Management Connie Pinto, Program Standards & Carol Walker, Manager Development Officer Urban Forestry – EWMS Project Forestry Policy and Planning Raymond Vendrig, Manager Ryan Garnett, Manager Urban Forestry Renewal Geospatial Data Integration & Access Page i of 270 2018 Tree Canopy Study Our thanks go also to the key experts who provided input on the draft key findings. Amory Ngan, Project Manager, Tree Planting Strategy, Urban Forestry Andrew Pickett, Urban Forestry Coordinator (A), Urban Forestry Christine Speelman, Sr. Project Coordinator (A), Urban Forestry David Kellershohn, Manager, Stormwater Manager, Toronto Water Jane Welsh, Project Manager, Zoning Bylaw & Environmental Planning, City Planning Jane Weninger, Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Banks & Food Resources Near Thorncliffe Park & Flemingdon Park
    Updated April 8th, 2020 Food Banks & Food Resources Near Thorncliffe Park & Flemingdon Park Food Access / Name / Address Contact Info Note(s) Office Hours - Must call ahead Thorncliffe Park Food Bank Food Access: Tel: 647-428-9755 - Register online using this link for food 1 Leaside Park Drive, Unit 5B *Delivery Only* Website: https://icnareliefcanada.ca/covid19 baskets that are delivered. Click “Need Toronto, ON M4H 1R1 Food?” to register. Food Access: Tel: 416-422-4322 Flemingdon Park Food Bank Mon & Wed 10 Gateway Blvd (Basement) Email: [email protected] - Must call ahead (12:00 – 3:30pm) Toronto, ON M3C 3A1 *Must Call Agead* Website: https://www.fcfoodbank.com/ Maryam Ali Latif: Afghan Women’s [email protected] / 416-422-2225 - Must call and leave message for call-back Food Access: Organization Food Bank - Priority for seniors / single parent families Monday Mornings Ext 227 747 Don Mills Road, Unit 200 - Delivery may be possible for clients with *By Appointment Only* Toronto, ON, M3C 1T2 Nooria Amiri: [email protected] / mobility challenges 416-388-8323 Community Share Food Bank Tel: 416-441-3209 - Need proof of residence in catchment area 33 Overland Drive - Catchment: Highway 401 to Eglinton Ave Food Access: Email: [email protected] Toronto, M3C 2C3 (north side of street) and Bayview Ave (east *By Appointment Only* Website: (Church of the Ascension, rear side of street) to Victoria Park Ave (west side entrance) https://www.communitysharefoodbank.ca/ of street) Meal / Grocery Delivery in East York/North
    [Show full text]
  • City Planning Phone Directory
    City Planning 1 City Planning City Planning provides advice to City Council on building issues. The division undertakes complex research projects, which lead to policy development in land use, environmental sustainability, community development, urban design and transportation. City Planning reviews development applications and recommends actions on these matters to Community Councils and the Planning and Transportation Committee. The division administers the Committee of Adjustment and provides expert planning advice to four Committee panels. Toronto City Hall Director 12th fl. E., 100 Queen St. W. Neil Cresswell ....................................... 394-8211 Toronto ON M5H 2N2 Administrative Assistant Annette Sukhai ...................................... 394-8212 Facsimile - General ..................................... 392-8805 Central Section (Wards 1, 2, 4, 6 – East of Royal York) - Chief Planner’s Office .............. 392-8115 Manager Bill Kiru ................................................. 394-8216 Administrative Assistant Chief Planner & Executive Director Kelly Allen ............................................ 394-8234 Jennifer Keesmaat ................................. 392-8772 Senior Planner Administrative Assistant Carly Bowman ....................................... 394-8228 Helen Skouras ........................................ 392-8110 Kathryn Thom ....................................... 394-8214 Adriana Suyck ....................................... 392-5217 Planner Program Manager Ellen Standret .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Hidden Epidemic a Report on Child and Family Poverty in Toronto
    THE HIDDEN EPIDEMIC A Report on Child and Family Poverty in Toronto The hidden epidemic A Report on Child and Family Poverty in Toronto November 2014 1 Acknowledgements This report was researched and written by a working group consisting of: Michael Polanyi Children’s Aid Society of Toronto and Alliance for a Poverty-Free Toronto Lesley Johnston Social Planning Toronto Anita Khanna Family Service Toronto/Ontario Campaign 2000 Said Dirie Children’s Aid Society of Toronto and Alliance for a Poverty-Free Toronto michael kerr Colour of Poverty – Colour of Change and Alliance for a Poverty-Free Toronto Research and data analysis support provided by the City of Toronto is gratefully acknowledged. Financial support was provided by the Children’s Aid Society of Toronto and the Children’s Aid Foundation’s Community Initiatives Program. Editing and design support was provided by Tilman Lewis and Peter Grecco. We thank Ann Fitzpatrick, Christa Freiler, Skylar Maharaj, Laurel Rothman and Alex Tranmer for their review of and assistance with the paper. THE HIDDEN EPIDEMIC A Report on Child and Family Poverty in Toronto Contents Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction 3 2. Current Levels of Child and Family Poverty in Toronto and Beyond 6 3. Which Toronto Children Are Affected by Poverty? 9 Geography 9 Ethno-racial Background 12 Indigenous Communities 13 Immigration or Citizenship Status 13 Disability 13 Family Structure 13 4. Growing Up in poverty – Reality and impacts on children in Toronto 14 Access to Nutrition 14 Access to Housing 16 Access to Education 17 Access to Recreation 19 5. Underlying Causes of Family Poverty 20 Inadequate Employment Income 20 Inadequate Income Supports and Community Services 22 Lack of Access to Affordable Public Services 24 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Cycling Network Plan Implementation in Thorncliffe Park and Flemingdon Park
    PW28.13 REPORT FOR ACTION Cycling Network Plan Implementation in Thorncliffe Park and Flemingdon Park Date: March 26, 2018 To: Public Works and Infrastructure Committee From: General Manager, Transportation Services Wards: Ward 26 SUMMARY The Ten Year Cycling Network Plan, adopted by Council in June, 2016 identified the need for cycling facilities in the Thorncliffe Park and Flemingdon Park neighbourhoods. Both communities are designated as Neighbourhood Improvement Areas under the Toronto Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy 2020. The purpose of this report is to seek Council authority to install the following cycling infrastructure: • Thorncliffe Park Drive (bicycle lanes) • Gateway Boulevard (bicycle lanes and short section of parking-protected cycle track) • Grenoble Drive (bicycle lanes) • Deauville Lane (bicycle lanes) The changes proposed will improve safety and mobility options for residents, including children and youth, by providing cycling connections to the schools, daycares, library, mosques, churches, and businesses in Thorncliffe Park and Flemingdon Park. Subject to Council approval, Transportation Services proposes to install the above cycling facilities in 2018, as a project 50% funded by the Federal Public Transit Infrastructure Fund (PTIF) program. Cycling Network Plan: Thorncliffe Park and Flemingdon Park Page 1 of 7 RECOMMENDATIONS The General Manager, Transportation Services, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize the installation of bicycle lanes on the following sections of roadway, as described in Attachment 2 – Amendments to Bicycle Lane Designations: • Thorncliffe Park Drive (entire length) • Gateway Boulevard (except for 135m between 73 and 85 Gateway Boulevard) • Grenoble Drive (entire length) • Deauville Lane (entire length) 2. City Council authorize the installation of Cycle Tracks on the following section of roadway, as described in Attachment 3 – Amendments to Cycle Track Lane Designations: • Gateway Boulevard (for 135m between 73 and 85 Gateway Boulevard) 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Studying Personal Communities in East York
    STUDYING PERSONAL COMMUNITIES IN EAST YORK Barry Wellman Research Paper No. 128 Centre for Urban and Community Studies University of Toronto April, 1982 ISSN: 0316-0068 ISBN: 0-7727-1288-3 Reprinted July 1982 ABSTRACT Network analysis has contributed to the study of community through its focus on structured social relationships and its de-emphasis of local solidarities. Yet the initial surveys of community networks were limited in scope and findings. Our research group is now using network analysis as a comprehensive structural approach to studying the place of community networks within large-scale divisions of labour. This paper reports on the analytical concerns, research design and preliminary findings of our new East York study of "personal communities". - 11 - STUDYING PERSONAL COMMUNITIES IN EAST YORK 1 OLD AND NEW CAMPAIGNS Generals often want to refight their last war; academics often want to redo their last study. The reasons are the same. The passage of time has made them aware of mistakes in strategy, preparations and analysis. New concepts and tools have come along to make the job easier. Others looking at the same events now claim to know better. If only we could do the job again! With such thoughts in mind, I want to look at where network analyses of communities have come from and where they are likely to go. However, I propose to spend less time in refighting the past (in part, because the battles have been successful) than in proposing strategic objectives for the present and future. In this paper, I take stock of the current state of knowledge in three ways: First, I relate community network studies to fundamental concerns of both social network analysis and urban sociology.
    [Show full text]