Law Commission – How We Consult

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Law Commission – How We Consult Making a will Consultation Paper 231 (Consultation Paper 231) Making a will © Crown Copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU or email [email protected]. This publication is available at www.lawcom.gov.uk. THE LAW COMMISSION – HOW WE CONSULT About the Law Commission: The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Rt Hon Lord Justice Bean, Chairman, Professor Nicholas Hopkins, Stephen Lewis, Professor David Ormerod QC and Nicholas Paines QC. The Chief Executive is Phillip Golding. Topic of this consultation: The law of wills. This consultation paper sets out options for reforming the law of wills and seeks consultees’ views on those options. The paper also asks consultees a number of open questions related to the law of wills. Geographical scope: This consultation paper applies to the law of England and Wales. Availability of materials: The consultation paper is available on our website at http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/wills/. Duration of the consultation: We invite responses from 13 July 2017 to 10 November 2017. Comments may be sent: By email to [email protected] OR By post to Damien Bruneau, Law Commission, 1st Floor, Tower, 52 Queen Anne’s Gate, London, SW1H 9AG. Tel: 020 3334 3100 / Fax: 020 3334 0201 If you send your comments by post, it would be helpful if, whenever possible, you could also send them electronically. After the consultation: In the light of the responses we receive, we will decide on our final recommendations and present them to Government. Consultation Principles: The Law Commission follows the Consultation Principles set out by the Cabinet Office, which provide guidance on type and scale of consultation, duration, timing, accessibility and transparency. The Principles are available on the Cabinet Office website at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/consultation-principles-guidance. Information provided to the Law Commission We may publish or disclose information you provide us in response to this consultation, including personal information. For example, we may publish an extract of your response in Law Commission publications, or publish the response in its entirety. We may also be required to disclose the information, such as in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 2000. If you want information that you provide to be treated as confidential please contact us first, but we cannot give an assurance that confidentiality can be maintained in all circumstances. An automatic disclaimer generated by your IT system will not be regarded as binding on the Law Commission. The Law Commission will process your personal data in accordance with the Data Protection Act 1998. i ii Contents PAGE GLOSSARY AND ABBREVIATIONS 1 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 5 The Law Commission’s review of the law of wills 5 History of the project 6 What is a will? 7 Testamentary freedom and the intestacy rules 8 Context 9 Probate and estate administration 9 Other ways in which property may pass from the deceased to others on death 10 Challenges to a will after the testator’s death 10 International law and the law of other jurisdictions 10 Reform 11 Scope 11 Objectives of reform 13 Beyond law reform 13 Impact 14 Structure of this consultation paper 15 Acknowledgements and thanks 17 The team working on the project 17 CHAPTER 2: CAPACITY 18 Introduction 18 The effect of incapacity 20 Causes of incapacity 21 The current test of testamentary capacity 22 Limb (1): nature and effect 23 Limb (2): extent of the estate 24 Limb (3): claims 24 Limb (4): disorder of the mind or delusions 24 Burden of proof 25 Problems with the Banks v Goodfellow test 26 Three or four limbs? 26 Does not reflect modern understandings of capacity 28 iii The relationship between Banks v Goodfellow and the Mental Capacity Act 2005 28 Reform 32 Adoption of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 test 34 Placing Banks v Goodfellow on a statutory footing 35 A statutory presumption of capacity 37 The rule in Parker v Felgate 38 Assessment of testamentary capacity: the golden rule 40 In what circumstances should a testator’s capacity be assessed? 42 Who should assess capacity? 43 Guidance on how capacity should be assessed 44 Supplementary approaches 45 A certificate of capacity 45 An accreditation scheme 47 CHAPTER 3: STATUTORY WILLS 49 The current law 49 The exercise of the court’s discretion 50 Procedure 51 The UN Disability Convention 53 Problems in law and practice 54 Critique of the rationale for statutory wills and the operation of best interests 54 Procedural concerns 56 Reform 57 CHAPTER 4: SUPPORTED WILL-MAKING 60 Introduction 60 Supported will-making and international law 60 The UN Disability Convention 61 Banks v Goodfellow 62 The Mental Capacity Act 2005 62 A scheme for supported will-making 64 Acting as a supporter 65 Appointing a supporter 65 Guidance on support 68 Safeguards 69 Providing for the scheme in law 70 iv CHAPTER 5: FORMALITIES 72 Introduction 72 The purpose of formalities 73 The current law of formalities 75 Presumption of due execution 75 The formalities required by section 9 76 Reform 83 The need for a will to be in writing 84 Signature of a will on behalf of the testator – a new restriction? 85 Reforms relating to witnesses 86 Privileged wills 92 A dispensing power 94 Registration of wills 102 CHAPTER 6: ELECTRONIC WILLS 105 Introduction 105 Potential advantages of the use of technology in will-making 106 The current law 107 Enabling electronic wills 111 Uncertainty in the current law 113 Electronic signatures: methods and challenges 113 Typed names and digital images of handwritten signatures 115 Passwords and PINs 117 Biometric signatures 119 Digital signatures 121 Conclusions 124 Storage of electronic wills 124 Video wills 125 The use of video evidence in relation to wills 128 Electronic wills and a dispensing power 129 CHAPTER 7: PROTECTING VULNERABLE TESTATORS: KNOWLEDGE AND APPROVAL AND UNDUE INFLUENCE 130 Introduction 130 Knowledge and approval 131 The meaning of knowledge and approval 131 Timing 132 Evidence and presumption 132 The two stage and one stage approaches to knowledge and approval 133 Mistakes 136 Undue influence 136 Equitable Undue Influence 137 Relationships of influence 138 v Calling for explanation 139 The presumption of undue influence 140 Testamentary undue influence 140 The approach to testamentary undue influence 141 Recent case law 142 Undue influence and fraudulent calumny 143 The relationship between knowledge and approval, undue influence and capacity 144 Knowledge and approval and capacity 144 Knowledge and approval and undue influence 146 Reform 149 Undue influence 149 Costs 158 The effect of reform 160 Knowledge and approval 161 CHAPTER 8: CHILDREN MAKING WILLS 163 Introduction 163 Does the current law cause inconvenience or injustice? 164 Comparison with other areas of law 166 Contract and gifts 166 The age of 16 as a threshold for decision making 167 Is an absolute rule necessary? 168 CHAPTER 9: INTERPRETATION AND RECTIFICATION 172 Introduction 173 The current law 173 Interpretation 173 Rectification 175 Relationship between rectification and interpretation 176 Reform 177 The order of interpretation and rectification 178 Interpretative provisions in the Wills Act 1837 180 New interpretative provisions 182 Widening the doctrine of rectification 184 Interaction with a dispensing power 185 vi CHAPTER 10: ADEMPTION 186 Introduction 186 Classification of gifts in a will 186 The law of ademption 187 The rationale for ademption 188 Reform 190 The respective position of attorneys and deputies 190 Incomplete transfers and options to purchase 194 Gifts of shares 197 Simultaneous death and destruction of property 198 Are wider reforms required? 199 Ademption by events beyond the control of the testator 199 Ademption where an interest in property is retained by the testator 201 CHAPTER 11: REVOCATION 202 Introduction 202 Another will or codicil 203 Express revocation 203 Implied revocation 203 Proof of revocation 204 Written intention to revoke 204 Destruction 205 Act of destruction 205 Intention to revoke 206 Reform 207 Marriage 209 Exceptions 210 Reform 211 CHAPTER 12: MUTUAL WILLS 216 Introduction 216 The Current Law 216 Execution of wills pursuant to an agreement 217 Agreement that the survivor shall be bound by the arrangement 217 The death of the first party 218 The effect of the mutual wills arrangement 218 Property subject to the trust 219 Problems in the law 220 Reform 221 Abolition 221 Placing mutual wills on a statutory footing 222 vii Changing the definition of net estate under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 222 CHAPTER 13: DONATIONES MORTIS CAUSA 226 Introduction 226 The current law 228 Contemplation of impending death 229 Gift conditional on death 230 Delivery of dominion 231 Effect of DMC 232 Problems with the law 234 Should DMC be abolished? 236 CHAPTER 14: OTHER THINGS A WILL COULD DO 238 Introduction 238 Digital assets 238 Burial and cremation 242 Guardianship 244 CHAPTER 15: CONSULTATION QUESTIONS 246 APPENDIX 1: PROVISIONS AUTHORISING MINORS TO MAKE WILLS 262 Succession Act 1981 (Queensland) 262 Wills Act 1997 (Victoria) 263 Succesion act 2006 (New South Wales) 264 Wills Act 1936 (South Australia) 265 APPENDIX 2: WILLS ACT 1837 – SECTIONS 23 TO 31 266 APPENDIX 3: DRAFT WILLS ACT 1994 (VICTORIA) 268 viii Glossary and abbreviations “Ademption”: where a gift in a will does not take effect at the testator’s death because the subject matter no longer exists or has fundamentally changed; for example because it has been given away or sold.
Recommended publications
  • Oxford Scholarship Online
    Uses, Wills, and Fiscal Feudalism University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship Online The Oxford History of the Laws of England: Volume VI 1483–1558 John Baker Print publication date: 2003 Print ISBN-13: 9780198258179 Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2012 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198258179.001.0001 Uses, Wills, and Fiscal Feudalism Sir John Baker DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198258179.003.0035 Abstract and Keywords This chapter examines property law related to uses, wills, and fiscal feudalism in England during the Tudor period. It discusses the conflict between landlords and tenants concerning land use, feoffment, and land revenue. The prevalence of uses therefore provoked a conflict of interests which could not be reduced to a simple question of revenue evasion. This was a major problem because during this period, the greater part of the land of England was in feoffments upon trust. Keywords: fiscal feudalism, land use, feoffments, property law, tenants, wills, landlords ANOTHER prolonged discussion, culminating in a more fundamental and far-reaching reform, concerned another class of tenant altogether, the tenant by knight-service. Here the debate concerned a different aspect of feudal tenure, the valuable ‘incidents’ which belonged to the lord on the descent of such a tenancy to an heir. The lord was entitled to Page 1 of 40 PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2014. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).
    [Show full text]
  • Rise and Fall of the Ultra Vires Doctrine in United States, United Kingdom, and Commonwealth Caribbean Corporate Common Law: a Triumph of Experience Over Logic
    DePaul Business and Commercial Law Journal Volume 5 Issue 1 Fall 2006 Article 4 Rise and Fall of the Ultra Vires Doctrine in United States, United Kingdom, and Commonwealth Caribbean Corporate Common Law: A Triumph of Experience Over Logic Stephen J. Leacock Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/bclj Recommended Citation Stephen J. Leacock, Rise and Fall of the Ultra Vires Doctrine in United States, United Kingdom, and Commonwealth Caribbean Corporate Common Law: A Triumph of Experience Over Logic, 5 DePaul Bus. & Com. L.J. 67 (2006) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/bclj/vol5/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Business and Commercial Law Journal by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Rise and Fall of the Ultra Vires Doctrine in United States, United Kingdom, and Commonwealth Caribbean Corporate Common Law: A Triumph of Experience Over Logic Stephen J.Leacock* "Pure logical thinking cannot yield us any knowledge of the empiri- cal world; all knowledge of reality starts from experience and ends in it."1 2 I. INTRODUCTION In free market3 economies, corporate laws change over time. More- over, experience has taught us that some legislative enactments, when * Professor of Law, Barry University School of Law. Barrister (Hons.) 1972, Middle Temple, London; LL.M. 1971, London University, King's College; M.A. (Bus. Law) CNAA 1971, City of London Polytechnic (now London Guildhall University), London; Grad.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Copyhold, Equity, and the Common Law by Charles
    BOOK REVIEWS Copyhold, Equity, and the Common Law. By Charles Montgomery Gray. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1963. Pp. 254. $6.50. Copyholds are not. and never have been a part of the American law of property.' Hence American lawyers-even those who specialize in the law of property-will not be immediately concerned with Professor Gray's monograph on Copyhold, Equity, and the Common Law. Nevertheless, American legal scholars, some of whom will surely be conveyancers, should be much interested in and perhaps even excited by Professor Gray's report. It is an extensive study of the numerous bills and other pleadings in the Court of Chancery, the Star Chamber, and the Court of Requests of the reign of Henry VIII, examined at the Public Records Office, and of the many unprinted reports of common law cases, princi- pally of the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, found in various collections of manuscripts in the British Museum. The appeal of the study for American lawyers will not depend upon the details of the law of copyholds which Professor Gray reports, but rather upon the development of remedies for the protection of copy- holders which he traces in careful detail. At the beginning of the period of the study, copyhold lands were "owned" by the lord of the manor in which they were situated. Though those lands had been used by the copyholders and their predecessors from time immemorial, the interest which they had was classified as a tenancy at the will of the lord of the manor in whom both the seisin and the freehold were vested.
    [Show full text]
  • Agrarian Reform in Eighteenth -Century Denmark
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers from the University Studies series (The University of Nebraska) University Studies of the University of Nebraska 1977 Agrarian Reform in Eighteenth -Century Denmark Lawrence J. Baack Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/univstudiespapers Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University Studies of the University of Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers from the University Studies series (The University of Nebraska) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. new senes no. 56 University of Nebraska Studies 1977 Agrarian Reform in Eighteenth-Century Denmark The University of Nebraska The Board of Regents JAMES H. MOYLAN ROBERT L. RAUN chairman EDWARD SCHWARTZKOPF CHRISTINE L. BAKER STEVEN E. SHOVERS KERMIT HANSEN ROBERT G. SIMMONS, JR. ROBERT R. KOEFOOT, M.D. KERMIT WAGNER WILLIAM J. MUELLER WILLIAM F. SWANSON ROBERT J. PROKOP, M.D. corporation secretary The President RONALD W. ROSKENS The Chancellor, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Roy A. YOUNG Committee on Scholarly Publications GERALD THOMPSON DAVID H. GILBERT chairman executive secretary JAMES HASSLER KENNETH PREUSS HENRY F. HOLTZCLAW ROYCE RONNING ROBERT KNOLL Lawrence J. Baack Agrarian Reform in Eighteenth-Century Denmark university of nebraska studies : new series no. 56 published by the university at lincoln: 1977 For my mother. Frieda Baack Copyright © 1977 by the Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 77-78548 UN ISSN 0077-6386 Manufactured in the United States of America Contents Preface vii Agrarian Reform in Eighteenth-Century Denmark 1 Notes 29 Acknowledgments 45 Preface AGRARIAN REFORM can be one of the most complex tasks of gov­ ernment.
    [Show full text]
  • Land and Feudalism in Medieval England
    Land and Feudalism in Medieval England by Magistra Rosemounde of Mercia Most people know that the feudal system controlled property ownership in England after the Norman conquest of 1066, but without a real understanding of what that means. Feudalism (the term was not actually used until the 17th century) was a social as well as an economic system. It combined elements of Germanic tradition with both Roman and Church law. It is a law of conquerors. The basis of English feudalism was that every person's position in society was defined through a relationship with land, because land was the major source of revenue and the real source of power. Prior to the Conquest, two types of land holdings were known in England: the Celtic, and later, the Germanic or Saxon. Under Celtic custom, all land was held by the sword. There were no legal institutions to protect ownership, only the owner's ability to hold it. Under the Saxon system, land ownership was tied to families. Land was not held of any superior and was not allowed to leave family possession. This form of holding was called folk-land. Folk-land was measured by dividing it into large counties that were then subdivided into hundreds. Later, as Saxon law was influenced by Roman law and the Christian Church, two other holdings developed: book-land, land that was a gift from a superior, and laen-land, land that was loaned to someone outside the family unit in exchange for something. This changed with the Norman conquest. William the Conqueror and his successors, claimed ownership of all the land in England, and everyone else held their land either directly or indirectly from the King.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Lancashire Manorial Records Final
    Lancashire Archives A Guide to Manorial Records Sarah Rose, Eleanor Straughton and Angus Winchester Lancashire Archives Lancaster University 2012 Lancashire Archives: A Guide to Manorial Records Text copyright © S. Rose, E. Straughton and A. Winchester LANCASTER U N I V E R S I T Y Lancashire Archives Lancashire Record Office Bow Lane Preston PR1 2RE 01772 533039 [email protected] www.archives.lancashire.gov.uk Lancashire Archives: A Guide to Manorial Records Contents Introduction 2 What are Manorial Records? 2 What is a Manor? 2 Manor courts 3 Subjects of Court Jurisdiction and Enquiry Manorial Tenants Manorial Rights Manorial Records 7 Interpreting the Record of a Manor Court 9 Locating Manorial Records 10 Manorial Documents Register Record Office Lists and Catalogues Major Collections of Lancashire Manorial Records Superior Lordships in Lancashire 11 Manorial Records for Local and Family History 13 Sources for Family History Sources for the History of the Community Sources for Property History Sources for the History of the Local Environment Further Reading 16 Glossary 19 Examples 24 1 Introduction This guide has been produced on behalf of Lancashire Archives as part of a collaborative project, run by The National Archives and Lancaster University, to digitise the Manorial Documents Register for Lancashire. The aim of this project is to raise awareness and encourage the use of manorial records. Parts of this guide have been reproduced from the Cumbrian Manorial Records website, which was created as part of the Cumbrian MDR project in 2006. http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/projects/manorialrecords/index.htm All the examples in this guide relate to the records of Lancashire manors held in collections at Lancashire Archives.
    [Show full text]
  • Wills Act 1837 (UK) Imperial Act 26 Date of Assent 3 July 1837
    Wills Act 1837 (UK) Imperial Act 26 Date of assent 3 July 1837 Contents Page Title 2 1 Interpretation 2 3 All property may be disposed of by will 3 6 Devolution of estates pur autre vie not disposed of by will 4 9 Formal requirements of will 5 10 Execution and validity of appointments by will 5 13 Publication of will not requisite 6 14 Will not to be void on account of incompetency of 6 attesting witness 15 Gifts to an attesting witness, or his or her wife, husband, 6 civil union partner, or de facto partner, to be void 16 Creditor attesting a will charging estate with debts to be 7 admitted a witness 17 Executor to be admitted a witness 7 18 Revocation of wills by marriage 7 19 No will to be revoked by presumption from altered 8 circumstances 20 Manner of revocation of will 8 21 Alteration in a will after execution, except in certain cases, 8 to have no effect unless executed as a will 22 Revoked will not to be revived otherwise than by 8 re­execution or a codicil 23 Subsequent conveyance or other act not to prevent 9 operation of will 24 Wills to be construed to speak from death of testator 9 25 Residuary devises to include estates comprised in lapsed 9 and void devises 26 General devise of land to include copyhold and leasehold 9 as well as freehold land 27 General gift of realty or personalty to include property 10 over which testator has a general power of appointment Note This Act is administered as to New Zealand by the Ministry of Justice 1 Reprinted as at Wills Act 1837 (UK) 3 September 2007 28 Devise of real estate without any
    [Show full text]
  • Book XVII License and the Law Editor: Ramon F
    8 88 8 8nd 8 8888on.com 8888 Basic Photography in 180 Days Book XVII License and the Law Editor: Ramon F. aeroramon.com Contents 1 Day 1 1 1.1 Photography and the law ....................................... 1 1.1.1 United Kingdom ....................................... 2 1.1.2 United States ......................................... 6 1.1.3 Hong Kong .......................................... 8 1.1.4 Hungary ............................................ 8 1.1.5 Macau ............................................. 8 1.1.6 South Africa ......................................... 8 1.1.7 Sudan and South Sudan .................................... 9 1.1.8 India .............................................. 10 1.1.9 Iceland ............................................ 10 1.1.10 Spain ............................................. 10 1.1.11 Mexico ............................................ 10 1.1.12 See also ............................................ 10 1.1.13 Notes ............................................. 10 1.1.14 References .......................................... 10 1.1.15 External links ......................................... 12 2 Day 2 13 2.1 Observation .............................................. 13 2.1.1 Observation in science .................................... 14 2.1.2 Observational paradoxes ................................... 14 2.1.3 Biases ............................................. 15 2.1.4 Observations in philosophy .................................. 16 2.1.5 See also ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall Ofthe Ultra Vires Rule in Corporate Law
    Mountbatten Journal ofLegal Studies The Rise and Fall ofthe Ultra Vires Rule in Corporate Law Stephen Griffin The purpose of this paper is to examine the historical development ofthe law in relation to its regulation of a registered company's capacity to enter into contractual relationships. The paper's focal point of discussion will be concerned with the applicability ofthe ultra vires rule; a rule which when it was originally conceived sought to restrict contractual capacity to specifIed objects contained within the company's memorandum of association. Accordingly, the paper will discuss the justification for the application ofthe ultra vires rule to incorporated companies, the subsequent judicial curtailment ofthe rule and f"mally, the eventual statutory abrogation ofthe rule in relation to a company's contractual dealings with third parties. The Ultra Vires Rule Prior to legislative reforms, culminating in those contained within the Companies Act 1989, the ultra vires rule was a regulatory device which sought to prevent a registered company from entering into any type of transaction which exceeded the scope ofthe company's contractual capacity; contractual capacity being determined by the contents of a company's object clause. I Where a transaction was ultra vires and void not even the unanimous consent of all shareholders would be able to reverse the effect of the transaction's invalidity. The application ofthe ultra vires rule to corporations was first evident in the form of contractual restraints placed upon statutory companies which had been formed in the nineteenth century in the wake of an expansion in economic activity.2 Statutory companies, formed primarily in connection with the utility industries were created by individual Acts of Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Quia Emptores, Subinfeudation, and the Decline of Feudalism In
    QUIA EMPTORES, SUBINFEUDATION, AND THE DECLINE OF FEUDALISM IN MEDIEVAL ENGLAND: FEUDALISM, IT IS YOUR COUNT THAT VOTES Michael D. Garofalo Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS August 2017 APPROVED: Christopher Fuhrmann, Committee Chair Laura Stern, Committee Member Mickey Abel, Minor Professor Harold Tanner, Chair of the Department of History David Holdeman, Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Victor Prybutok, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Garofalo, Michael D. Quia Emptores, Subinfeudation, and the Decline of Feudalism in Medieval England: Feudalism, it is Your Count that Votes. Master of Science (History), August 2017, 123 pp., bibliography, 121 titles. The focus of this thesis is threefold. First, Edward I enacted the Statute of Westminster III, Quia Emptores in 1290, at the insistence of his leading barons. Secondly, there were precedents for the king of England doing something against his will. Finally, there were unintended consequences once parliament passed this statute. The passage of the statute effectively outlawed subinfeudation in all fee simple estates. It also detailed how land was able to be transferred from one possessor to another. Prior to this statute being signed into law, a lord owed the King feudal incidences, which are fees or services of various types, paid by each property holder. In some cases, these fees were due in the form of knights and fighting soldiers along with the weapons and armor to support them. The number of these knights owed depended on the amount of land held. Lords in many cases would transfer land to another person and that person would now owe the feudal incidences to his new lord, not the original one.
    [Show full text]
  • Blackstone, the Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Blackstone, the Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law Citation for published version: Cairns, JW 1985, 'Blackstone, the Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law', Historical Journal, vol. 28, pp. 711-717. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X00003381 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X00003381 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Historical Journal Publisher Rights Statement: ©Cairns, J. (1985). Blackstone, the Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law. Historical Journal, 28, 711-17doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X00003381 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 27. Sep. 2021 The Historical Journal, 28, 3 (1985), pp. 711-717 Printed in Great Britain BLACKSTONE, THE ANCIENT CONSTITUTION AND THE FEUDAL LAW* JOHN CAIRNS University of Edinburgh
    [Show full text]
  • The Wills Aot 1934
    327 TASMANIA. THE WILLS AOT 1934, ANALYSIS. ,,1. Short title. No alteration in a will shall 2. Amendment of 4 Vict. No. 9. have any effect unless executed Title. as a will. Preamble. No will revoked to be revived Section 1. otherwise than by re-execution New section 2. or a codicil to revive it. Commencement. A devise not to he rendered in­ New section 3. operative by any subsequent Repeal. conveyance, &c. New section 4. A will shall be construed to Short title. speak from death of testator. New schedule. A residuary devise shall include Provisions adopted. estates comprised in lapsed Section 1. and void devises. " WilL" A general devise of the testator's " Real estate." land shall include copyhold " Personal p.state." and leasehold as well as free­ Allproperty may be disposed of hold lands. bv will. A general gift shall include Est~tes pur autre vie. estates over which the testator Contingent interests. has a general power of Rights of entry; and property appointment. acquired after execution of A devise without any words the will. of limitation shall be con­ E~tates pur autre vie. strued to pass the fee. No will of a person under age The words" die without issue" in valid ; or of a feme covert; or "die without leaving is­ except! &c. sue" shall be construed to Every wIll shall be in writing, mean die without issue living and signed by the testator in at the death. the presence of two witnesees No devise to trustees or exe­ at one time. cutors except fc)r a term, &c.
    [Show full text]