Trumpeter Finches: New to Britain and Ireland D

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Trumpeter Finches: New to Britain and Ireland D British Birds VOLUME 70 NUMBER 2 FEBRUARY 1977 Trumpeter Finches: new to Britain and Ireland D. I. M. Wallace, F. K. Cobb and C. R. Tubbs here can be few European birds more associated with arid habitats and Thot climates than the Trumpeter Finch Rhodopechys githaginea. It had never been expected in Britain or Ireland and when, in late spring 1971, reports were heard of one in Suffolk and another in Sutherland, most listeners shared the initial incredulity of the observers: surely the birds had escaped from captivity ? The submission, however, of both records to the Rarities Committee and the Records Committee of the British Orni• thologists' Union encouraged research into the status of the Trumpeter Finch in Iberia and elsewhere. It became apparent that this species had successfully crossed the Mediterranean from northwest Africa and was showing signs of unusual dispersal. Eventually, in January 1974, it was accepted for category A of the British and Irish list. This paper publishes the details of the two British records and summarises the background to them. It also describes the first record for the Channel Islands in October !973- [Brit. Birds, 70: 45-49, February 1977] 45 46 Trumpeter Finches The British records in Suffolk and Sutherland At about 10.00 hours on 30th May 1971, FKC and Mrs A. E. Cobb were birdwatching among the sand dunes about i-J km south of Minsmere cliff, Suffolk. AEC spotted a small, dull passerine feeding on bare ground behind the dunes. When she drew FKC's attention to it, he recognised it immediately as a Trumpeter Finch, a species which he had previously seen in Morocco. Joined by Miss A. J. Towns, FKC and AEC observed the bird for four to five minutes, obtained brief notes on it and then watched it seemingly suddenly disappear, as the species so often does. Although FKC was not aware ot any caged Trumpeter Finches, the unlikelihood of a natural origin caused him to dismiss the bird as an escape. News of the record spread, discussion of the bird's origin waxed and interest grew dramatically when it reappeared on the sand dunes at Minsmere about ten days later. On 12th June, it was found there inde• pendently and closely observed by D. J. Holman and R. E. Turley. On 15th June it was rediscovered, on the cliff top to the north, by R. J. Johns and other observers. The following description of its habits and appearance is based on DJH's full notes of 12th June: Dumpy finch with heavy bill; large, round head and plump body; rather larger than accompanying Linnets Acanthis cannabina on the ground and recalling a Hawfinch Coccothraustes coccothraustes, both in flight silhouette and action; stance on ground upright; gait a rather springy, bouncing hop. Noticeably short, rounded wings and short tail, both contributing to the dumpy appearance. Plumage pale sandy-brown (but pinker to RET), except for duller, less sandy, plainer brown flight feathers and tail and noticeably bright pink rump, similar in tone to that of male Twite A. flavirostris. Underparts perhaps slightly greyer than upperparts. No sign of wear on wings or tail. Bill large and stumpy, with more gently rounded tip than that of Hawfinch, and strikingly bright pinkish-red; legs pale pink; eyes rather small and dark brown. Kept exclusively to bare, stony and sandy cliff top or shore path, ignoring nearby grass fields. Approachable to 10 m; escape flight sudden and high. Relating the brief notes by FKC and AJT to DJH's description is difficult. To FKC, the bird appeared generally 'pinkish-buff' and its bill (in a brief glimpse) 'yellowish'; to AJT, the chest was 'rosy-pink', this colour indicating a male. The most marked discrepancy is in bill colour and this has led FKC to suggest that there may have been two birds. DJH, however, feels that only one was involved in the various reports. The most economical explanation of the differences is that the bird was a male, probably in its first summer, and still in the process of developing its bare part colours. Just how long this Trumpeter Finch stayed at Minsmere is not known, but, though reports continued into July, the last confirmed sighting was by J. Docwra on 19th June. Meanwhile, 800 km to the northwest of Minsmere, a second bird ap• peared. At about 11.00 hours on 8th June, CRT and Mrs J. M. Tubbs found a dull, ground-feeding finch in an area of eroded shell-sand dune on Handa Island, Sutherland. They were unable to identify jt immediately, but, since it remained on the island until 18.00 hours on th'e 9th, they were able to write notes from which the following description is culled: Small, rather dumpy finch, with conically shaped bill and short tail, approximately size of accompanying Twite and with flight silhouette and action recalling Woodlark Trumpeter Finches 47 Lullula arborea; gait hopping; habitual posture a crouch. Plumage unstreaked sandy buff, paler below, with dusky-brown around bill base and eye (visible only at close range) and dark (perhaps black) primaries and tail feathers; some secondaries also showing black with pale edges. Bill pinky-orange; legs flesh. Approachable to 5-10 m. Silent. The problems of the reviewing committees did not stem from the process of identification. Descriptions of uniformly coloured birds are necessarily brief, but there was no doubt about either of the birds. What had to be explained was their origin. As is usual in these cases, M. D. England pur• sued the question of escapes and concluded that, as the only three known captives in Britain were secure in their cages, the two records should be regarded as referring to wild birds. His expert opinion satisfied most committee members, but it was felt necessary to explore the status of Trumpeter Finches in southern Europe in the hope of finding other records indicative of northward vagrancy. The invasion into Spain Vagrant Trumpeter Finches are known to have been reaching southern Spain since the end of the 19th century and, in April 1961, April 1964 and November 1964, single ones appeared in the vicinity of San Lucar de Barrameda and La Talona, in the province of Cadiz (Hidalgo 1961, 1965). Meanwhile, there had been a single observation in the province of Almeria in 1963, and in that area records then mounted rapidly from 1968. In February 1969, no less than 60 were netted from a flock at a drinking pool at La Canada (Cano 1968) and, following exploration in the same year of the whole wasteland between the city of Almeria, Sierra Alhamilla and Cabo de Gata, Cano (1971) concluded that the species was abundant there. These birds had also become a prime target for trappers. Breeding was first presumed in 1968 (George 1969), such comment being repeated in 1969 and 1970 (Dorka, Pfau and Spaeter 1970, Cano 1971) and finally proved in 1971, the year of the British records (Cano and Konig 1971, Rodriguez 1972); the last reference includes photographic proof of a nest with five chicks. The province of Almeria contains much desolate and arid terrain, with rock slopes and ravines interspersed with scrub- covered or bare levels, and offers the Trumpeter Finch a biotope virtually identical to that occupied by it in parts of North Africa (George 1969). There is no doubt that by 1971 the Trumpeter Finch had become a potentially numerous breeding resident in southeast Spain. It is sad that it was greeted by large-scale trapping. The race involved is presumed to be zedlitzi (northwest Africa and the Sahara), to which the one caught in April 1961 was ascribed by the British Museum (Natural History) (Hidalgo 1961). Other records relevant to vagrancy In addition to the mounting records for mainland Spain, others have been found in Mallorca, again significantly in spring 1971 (per P. J. Grant), but details are lacking. Even so, there was no indication of any further striking northward movements over western Europe until 1973, when on 48 Trumpeter Finches 29th October one was discovered by M. J. Lee on Alderney, Channel Islands, feeding in open fields with House Sparrows Passer domesticus and three other finch species. The details of this record follow: Short, stubby finch, with bill like that of Bullfinch Pyrrhula pyrrhula; about the size of accompanying House Sparrows. Plumage generally pink-buff, with pinkish-red face mask like that of a Goldfinch Carduelis carduelis, slightly darker crown, grey nape and wings, paler rump and pale cream undertail-coverts; primaries darker grey than rest of wing; outer tail feathers pale. Bill thick and heavy, pinkish-red; legs as bill. Approachable to under 20 m; when flushed in alarm, perched high. Silent. Once again, no doubt arises about the identification of this bird (it was clearly a male), which provides a connecting link with the two British records. Biology of the species The Trumpeter Finch, first described from upper Egypt in 1823, is the commonest and most widespread of four species in the genus Rhodopechys, which Vaurie (1959) placed after Leucosticte (rosy finches), between Acanthis (linnets) and Carpodacus (rosefinches). In addition to the nominate form from Egypt and Sudan, there are three others: amantum, an island race from the Canaries; zedlitzi, a mainland race discontinuous in northwest Africa and the central and southern Sahara; and crassirostris, another mainland race widespread in southwest Asia, from Sinai to Sind. The Trumpeter Finch is everywhere essentially a resident species, but the up• land populations of the Asian form move down to nearby plains in winter. Clearly, the northwest African form has recently exhibited a pronounced pattern of northward movement, but whether this is in response to climatic change, population pressure or some other cause is not known.
Recommended publications
  • Crimson-Winged Finch Miracle Tour
    Birdwatching Holidays in Spain, Morocco & more… BOLETAS Birdwatching centre 22192 Loporzano (Huesca) – Spain tel/fax 00 34 974 262027 or 01162 889318 e.mail: [email protected] // www.boletas.org Esther Diago Millán - NIF 38493051K “Crimson-winged Finch Miracle Tour” After almost all morning walking in the High Atlas searching for the finches without success, a single beautiful male was “feeding” on the snow in a miraculous encounter. We all were shocked. TOUR DATES Morocco 11 March to 21st March 09 Party: Simon Scarth , Janette Scarth , Peter Thompson , Geraldine Thompson Mick Daubney , Ann Daubney, Anders Arnell , Stephen Charles Penn , Steve Wilce , Susan Wilce Tour Leader : Josele J. Saiz Total Number of Species : 172 Weather & Sites: Day 1 – Sunny and Nice Marrakesh, Oued Souss , Agadir Day 2 – Sunny and a bit hot Sous Massa – Sous Massa Plains – Oued Souss Day 3 – Sunny and misty Agadir – Tamri – Paradise Valley – Souss River Bank - Tadourant Day 4 – Sunny and pleasant with some sowers Tadourant – Souss River in Aoulouz – Tamsint – Ouazarzate Reservoir Day 5 – Sunny and cold Tagdilt Track – – Boulmane Dades Day 6 – Sunny and cold Tagdilt Track – Todra Gorge – Merzouga Oasis Day 7 – Sunny and nice Merzouga Desert – Merzouga Lake Day 8 – Sunny and nice Merzouga Oasis – Risanni – Boulmane Dades – Ouazarzate Reservoir Day 9 - Sunny and cold Dar Daif – Ait Benhadou – Tizi´n Tichka Pass- Arbalou – Boletas Raptor Watch Point Day 10- Sunny and pleasant Okaimenden – Atlas Mountains Money for conservation has gone to : Bald Ibis Project in Morocco run by SEO-Birdilfe Favourite bird of the tour Ander Arnell - Thick-billed Lark Peter Thomson - Lanner Geraldine Thomson - Bald Ibis Steve Wilce - Cream-coloured Courser Susan Wilce - Cream-coloured Courser Janet Scarth - Desert Sparrow Simon Scarth - Cream-coloured Courser Mick Daubney - Hoopoe Lark Ann Daubney - Hoopoe Lark Stephen Penn - Lanner Josele J.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeography of Finches and Sparrows
    In: Animal Genetics ISBN: 978-1-60741-844-3 Editor: Leopold J. Rechi © 2009 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chapter 1 PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF FINCHES AND SPARROWS Antonio Arnaiz-Villena*, Pablo Gomez-Prieto and Valentin Ruiz-del-Valle Department of Immunology, University Complutense, The Madrid Regional Blood Center, Madrid, Spain. ABSTRACT Fringillidae finches form a subfamily of songbirds (Passeriformes), which are presently distributed around the world. This subfamily includes canaries, goldfinches, greenfinches, rosefinches, and grosbeaks, among others. Molecular phylogenies obtained with mitochondrial DNA sequences show that these groups of finches are put together, but with some polytomies that have apparently evolved or radiated in parallel. The time of appearance on Earth of all studied groups is suggested to start after Middle Miocene Epoch, around 10 million years ago. Greenfinches (genus Carduelis) may have originated at Eurasian desert margins coming from Rhodopechys obsoleta (dessert finch) or an extinct pale plumage ancestor; it later acquired green plumage suitable for the greenfinch ecological niche, i.e.: woods. Multicolored Eurasian goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis) has a genetic extant ancestor, the green-feathered Carduelis citrinella (citril finch); this was thought to be a canary on phonotypical bases, but it is now included within goldfinches by our molecular genetics phylograms. Speciation events between citril finch and Eurasian goldfinch are related with the Mediterranean Messinian salinity crisis (5 million years ago). Linurgus olivaceus (oriole finch) is presently thriving in Equatorial Africa and was included in a separate genus (Linurgus) by itself on phenotypical bases. Our phylograms demonstrate that it is and old canary. Proposed genus Acanthis does not exist. Twite and linnet form a separate radiation from redpolls.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention
    Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention: the role of the Convention on Wetlands in the Conservation and Wise Use of Biodiversity edited by A. J. Hails Ramsar Convention Bureau Ministry of Environment and Forest, India 1996 [1997] Published by the Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland, with the support of: • the General Directorate of Natural Resources and Environment, Ministry of the Walloon Region, Belgium • the Royal Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark • the National Forest and Nature Agency, Ministry of the Environment and Energy, Denmark • the Ministry of Environment and Forests, India • the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Sweden Copyright © Ramsar Convention Bureau, 1997. Reproduction of this publication for educational and other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior perinission from the copyright holder, providing that full acknowledgement is given. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. The views of the authors expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect those of the Ramsar Convention Bureau or of the Ministry of the Environment of India. Note: the designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Ranasar Convention Bureau concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Citation: Halls, A.J. (ed.), 1997. Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention: The Role of the Convention on Wetlands in the Conservation and Wise Use of Biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • European Red List of Birds
    European Red List of Birds Compiled by BirdLife International Published by the European Commission. opinion whatsoever on the part of the European Commission or BirdLife International concerning the legal status of any country, Citation: Publications of the European Communities. Design and layout by: Imre Sebestyén jr. / UNITgraphics.com Printed by: Pannónia Nyomda Picture credits on cover page: Fratercula arctica to continue into the future. © Ondrej Pelánek All photographs used in this publication remain the property of the original copyright holder (see individual captions for details). Photographs should not be reproduced or used in other contexts without written permission from the copyright holder. Available from: to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed Published by the European Commission. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. ISBN: 978-92-79-47450-7 DOI: 10.2779/975810 © European Union, 2015 Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Printed in Hungary. European Red List of Birds Consortium iii Table of contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................................1 Executive summary ...................................................................................................................................................5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan
    NEPA Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan An Output of the National Capacity Needs Self-Assessment for Global Environment Management (NCSA) for Afghanistan June 2008 United Nations Environment Programme Post-Conflict and Disaster Management Branch First published in Kabul in 2008 by the United Nations Environment Programme. Copyright © 2008, United Nations Environment Programme. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. United Nations Environment Programme Darulaman Kabul, Afghanistan Tel: +93 (0)799 382 571 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.unep.org DISCLAIMER The contents of this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of UNEP, or contributory organizations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Unless otherwise credited, all the photos in this publication have been taken by the UNEP staff. Design and Layout: Rachel Dolores
    [Show full text]
  • The Phylogenetic Relationships and Generic Limits of Finches
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 62 (2012) 581–596 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev The phylogenetic relationships and generic limits of finches (Fringillidae) ⇑ Dario Zuccon a, , Robert Pryˆs-Jones b, Pamela C. Rasmussen c, Per G.P. Ericson d a Molecular Systematics Laboratory, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden b Bird Group, Department of Zoology, Natural History Museum, Akeman St., Tring, Herts HP23 6AP, UK c Department of Zoology and MSU Museum, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA d Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden article info abstract Article history: Phylogenetic relationships among the true finches (Fringillidae) have been confounded by the recurrence Received 30 June 2011 of similar plumage patterns and use of similar feeding niches. Using a dense taxon sampling and a com- Revised 27 September 2011 bination of nuclear and mitochondrial sequences we reconstructed a well resolved and strongly sup- Accepted 3 October 2011 ported phylogenetic hypothesis for this family. We identified three well supported, subfamily level Available online 17 October 2011 clades: the Holoarctic genus Fringilla (subfamly Fringillinae), the Neotropical Euphonia and Chlorophonia (subfamily Euphoniinae), and the more widespread subfamily Carduelinae for the remaining taxa. Keywords: Although usually separated in a different
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN BIRDS of CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, Trends and National Responsibilities
    EUROPEAN BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, trends and national responsibilities COMPILED BY ANNA STANEVA AND IAN BURFIELD WITH SPONSORSHIP FROM CONTENTS Introduction 4 86 ITALY References 9 89 KOSOVO ALBANIA 10 92 LATVIA ANDORRA 14 95 LIECHTENSTEIN ARMENIA 16 97 LITHUANIA AUSTRIA 19 100 LUXEMBOURG AZERBAIJAN 22 102 MACEDONIA BELARUS 26 105 MALTA BELGIUM 29 107 MOLDOVA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 32 110 MONTENEGRO BULGARIA 35 113 NETHERLANDS CROATIA 39 116 NORWAY CYPRUS 42 119 POLAND CZECH REPUBLIC 45 122 PORTUGAL DENMARK 48 125 ROMANIA ESTONIA 51 128 RUSSIA BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is a partnership of 48 national conservation organisations and a leader in bird conservation. Our unique local to global FAROE ISLANDS DENMARK 54 132 SERBIA approach enables us to deliver high impact and long term conservation for the beneit of nature and people. BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is one of FINLAND 56 135 SLOVAKIA the six regional secretariats that compose BirdLife International. Based in Brus- sels, it supports the European and Central Asian Partnership and is present FRANCE 60 138 SLOVENIA in 47 countries including all EU Member States. With more than 4,100 staf in Europe, two million members and tens of thousands of skilled volunteers, GEORGIA 64 141 SPAIN BirdLife Europe and Central Asia, together with its national partners, owns or manages more than 6,000 nature sites totaling 320,000 hectares. GERMANY 67 145 SWEDEN GIBRALTAR UNITED KINGDOM 71 148 SWITZERLAND GREECE 72 151 TURKEY GREENLAND DENMARK 76 155 UKRAINE HUNGARY 78 159 UNITED KINGDOM ICELAND 81 162 European population sizes and trends STICHTING BIRDLIFE EUROPE GRATEFULLY ACKNOWLEDGES FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of Those Ar- Dana L Moseley Ticles Using Packages Tm and Topicmodels in R to Ex- Graham E Derryberry Tract Common Words and Trends
    ABSTRACT BOOK Listed alphabetically by last name of presenting author Oral Presentations . 2 Lightning Talks . 161 Posters . 166 AOS 2018 Meeting 9-14 April 2018 ORAL PRESENTATIONS Combining citizen science with targeted monitoring we argue how the framework allows for effective large- for Gulf of Mexico tidal marsh birds scale inference and integration of multiple monitoring efforts. Scientists and decision-makers are interested Evan M Adams in a range of outcomes at the regional scale, includ- Mark S Woodrey ing estimates of population size and population trend Scott A Rush to answering questions about how management actions Robert J Cooper or ecological questions influence bird populations. The SDM framework supports these inferences in several In 2010, the Deepwater Horizon oil spill affected many ways by: (1) monitoring projects with synergistic ac- marsh birds in the Gulf of Mexico; yet, a lack of prior tivities ranging from using approved standardized pro- monitoring data made assessing impacts to these the tocols, flexible data sharing policies, and leveraging population impacts difficult. As a result, the Gulf of multiple project partners; (2) rigorous data collection Mexico Avian Monitoring Network (GoMAMN) was that make it possible to integrate multiple monitoring established, with one of its objectives being to max- projects; and (3) monitoring efforts that cover multiple imize the value of avian monitoring projects across priorities such that projects designed for status assess- the region. However, large scale assessments of these ment can also be useful for learning or describing re- species are often limited, tidal marsh habitat in this re- sponses to management activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Important Bird Areas (Iba)
    1 IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS (IBA) PROGRAMME SUB THEMATIC REWIEW NOTE FOR THE NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY AND ACTION PLAN Supriya Jhunjhunwala IBA Ornithology Officer Bombay Natural History Society Hornbill House, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Road Mumbai 400023 1. Introduction Important Bird Areas and Biodiversity Conservation India ranks amongst the most biodiverse countries in the world. Currently 1220 species of breeding, staging and wintering birds, occupying a wide array of natural, semi natural and urban habitats are known from India (Manakadan & Pittie 2001). Notwithstanding the deep rooted traditional conservation of natural resources that still exist in India, growth of human population result in agricultural intensification, expansion in industrial capacity, increased levels of wetland drainage, pollution, deforestation for fuel wood and timber, coastal land reclamation and desertification. Changes in land use patterns have had a detrimental impact on habitats, which have been fragmented and reduced in extent and diversity. This has resulted in a marked reduction in abundance and range of several bird species. Seventy-nine Indian bird species are globally threatened with extinction of these 9 are listed as Critical, 10 species as Endangered, 57 are Vulnerable, 2 are conservation dependent and 1 is data deficient. A further 52 are classified as Near Threatened (BirdLife International 2000). Large proportions of the rest of the bird species in India is rapidly declining and are in urgent need of conservation action. Approaches to biodiversity conservation The conservation of biodiversity and natural resources including birds can generally be approached in the following ways: • Protection of species from direct threats like hunting is done through legislation and direct persecution.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Data Book of European Vertebrates : a Contribution to Action Theme N° 11 of the Pan-European Biological and Landscape Diversity Strategy, Final Draft
    Strasbourg, 5 July 2001 T-PVS (2001) 31 [Bern\T-PVS 2001\tpvs31e_2001] English only CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS Standing Committee Preliminary European Red List of Vertebrates Draft for comments - Volume 1 - Joint project between the Council of Europe and the European Environment Agency, based on WCMC draft from 1998. Co-ordinated by the European Topic Centre/Nature Conservation – Paris This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. T-PVS (2001) 31 - II - Comments should be sent to: European Topic Centre for Nature Protection and Biodiversity MNHN 57 rue Cuvier 75231 PARIS Cedex, France [email protected] - III - T-PVS (2001) 31 About this draft Red List This document is the result of a joint project between the European Environment Agency and the Council of Europe to develop a preliminary European Red List of Vertebrates. It is based on a first draft by WCMC in 1998. Except for Birds (Birdlife International, 1994), no assessment is yet available on the conservation status of Vertebrate species at European level, while Red Books exist at national level in almost all European countries. On the other hand, a global list of threatened species is published and maintained up-dated by IUCN according to well defined criteria (IUCN, 2000). The present assessment is a first attempt to identify the most threatened Vertebrates species at European level, building upon a first analysis of the list of globally threatened species present in Europe (WCMC, 1998) and taking into account the most recent available overviews on European species distribution provided by the various European atlas committees (European Bird Census Council; Societas Europaea Herpetologica, Societas Europea Mammalogica).
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy of True Finches (Fringillidae, Passeriformes): a Review of Problems1 V
    ISSN 10623590, Biology Bulletin, 2015, Vol. 42, No. 8, pp. 713–723. © Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2015. Original Russian Text © V.A. Payevsky, 2015, published in Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 2015, Vol. 94, No. 2, pp. 221–232. Taxonomy of True Finches (Fringillidae, Passeriformes): a Review of Problems1 V. A. Payevsky Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, 199034 Russia email: [email protected] Received February 10, 2014 Abstract—A number of issues in phylogeny and classification of true finches is reviewed. Emphasis is made on poor knowledge of their relationships, in spite of intensive research. The main historic stages of develop ment of true finches classification are reviewed together with the results of molecular studies of their phylog eny. Most recent revisions at the level of subfamilies and genera of true finches are discussed. Keywords: birds, passerines, true finches, Fringillidae, taxonomy, phylogeny, classification DOI: 10.1134/S1062359015080051 1 Avian phylogeny and classification currently state that the limits of the true finch family are uncer remain hotly debated topics. This debate became tain, and that different and often strongly varying especially acute in conjunction with the advent of views on this topic exist (Sharpe, 1888; Sushkin, 1924; molecular methods in taxonomy. The recent reviews Dementiev, 1937; Tordoff, 1954; Stallcup, 1954; Wet of classification of passerines, Passeriformes (Sibley more, 1960; Kartashev, 1974; Sibley and Ahlquist, and Ahlquist, 1990; Koblik et al., 2014; Payevsky, 1990; Sibley and Monroe, 1990; Cramp and Perrins, 2014), which comprise ca. 60% of extant birds (Sibley 1994; Yuri and Mindell, 2002 etc.). In spite of varying and Monroe, 1990), highlighted ongoing difficulties opinions on individual genera and species, based on that taxonomists encounter in defining the family lim both morphological and molecular data, the main dis its in this order.
    [Show full text]
  • • the Following Pages Have Some Identification Markers for Each of the Finch Found in India • to Know More on These Birds Yo
    • The following pages have some identification markers for each of the Finch found in India • To know more on these birds you can visit http://ogaclicks.com/finch/ • If you are interested in Coming on any of my tours or workshops please share your email id. I will keep you updated • Mail me at [email protected] • You can also call me on (91)9840119078 , (91) 9445219078 (91) 6369815812 Finches of India Sno. Name Binomial Name Bull finches 1 Brown Bullfinch Pyrrhula nipalensis 2 Grey-headed Bullfinch Pyrrhula erythaca 3 Orange Bullfinch Pyrrhula aurantiaca 4 Red-headed Bullfinch Pyrrhula erythrocephala Miscll Finches 1 Brambling Fringilla montifringilla 2 Common chaffinch Fringilla coelebs 3 Crimson Winged Finch Rhodopechys sanguineus 4 Desert Finch Rhodospiza obsoleta 5 Desert Finch Rhodospiza obsoleta 6 Eurasian Siskin Carduelis spinus 7 European Goldfinch Carduelis carduelis 8 Golden-naped Finch Pyrrhoplectes epauletta 9 Hawfinch Coccothraustes coccothraustes 10 Mongolian Finch Eremopsaltria mongolica 11 Red Crossbill Loxia curvirostra 12 Red-fronted Serin Serinus pusillus 13 Spectacled Finch Callacanthis burtoni 14 Tibetan Serin Serinus thibetanus 15 Trumpeter Finch Bucanetes githagineus 16 Twite Carduelis flavirostris 17 Yellow-breasted Greenfinch Carduelis spinoides Finches of India Sno. Name Binomial Name Mountain Finches 1 Brandt's Mountain Finch Leucosticte brandti 2 Plain Mountain Finch Leucosticte nemoricola Rose Finches 1 Beautiful Rosefinch Carpodacus pulcherrimus 2 Blanford's Rosefinch Carpodacus rubescens 3 Common Rosefinch
    [Show full text]