Taxonomy of True Finches (Fringillidae, Passeriformes): a Review of Problems1 V

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Taxonomy of True Finches (Fringillidae, Passeriformes): a Review of Problems1 V ISSN 10623590, Biology Bulletin, 2015, Vol. 42, No. 8, pp. 713–723. © Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2015. Original Russian Text © V.A. Payevsky, 2015, published in Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 2015, Vol. 94, No. 2, pp. 221–232. Taxonomy of True Finches (Fringillidae, Passeriformes): a Review of Problems1 V. A. Payevsky Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, 199034 Russia email: [email protected] Received February 10, 2014 Abstract—A number of issues in phylogeny and classification of true finches is reviewed. Emphasis is made on poor knowledge of their relationships, in spite of intensive research. The main historic stages of develop ment of true finches classification are reviewed together with the results of molecular studies of their phylog eny. Most recent revisions at the level of subfamilies and genera of true finches are discussed. Keywords: birds, passerines, true finches, Fringillidae, taxonomy, phylogeny, classification DOI: 10.1134/S1062359015080051 1 Avian phylogeny and classification currently state that the limits of the true finch family are uncer remain hotly debated topics. This debate became tain, and that different and often strongly varying especially acute in conjunction with the advent of views on this topic exist (Sharpe, 1888; Sushkin, 1924; molecular methods in taxonomy. The recent reviews Dementiev, 1937; Tordoff, 1954; Stallcup, 1954; Wet of classification of passerines, Passeriformes (Sibley more, 1960; Kartashev, 1974; Sibley and Ahlquist, and Ahlquist, 1990; Koblik et al., 2014; Payevsky, 1990; Sibley and Monroe, 1990; Cramp and Perrins, 2014), which comprise ca. 60% of extant birds (Sibley 1994; Yuri and Mindell, 2002 etc.). In spite of varying and Monroe, 1990), highlighted ongoing difficulties opinions on individual genera and species, based on that taxonomists encounter in defining the family lim both morphological and molecular data, the main dis its in this order. agreements on the limits of taxa have been on the level The family of true finches (Fringillidae) tradition of subfamilies. During the entire history of taxonomy ally includes mainly birds with coneshaped bill, i.e. of true finches, different authors included into or typical seedeaters, with short and stout bill and nine excluded from this family such groups, in whole or functional primary feathers. Structure of palate sur partly, as buntings (Emberizidae), Darwin’s or Gal face with oblong crests, typical of conebilled birds, is apagos finches (Geospizidae), a number of weavers perfected in true finches. This form makes it possible (Ploceidae), in particular true sparrows (genera Passer to shell the seeds by longitudinal movements of sharp Briss., Petronia Kaup, Montifringilla Brehm), cardi mandible edges. True finches are distributed nearly nals (Cardinalidae, or Pyrrhuloxiidae), Hawaiian globally (Eurasia, Africa, North and South America), honeycreepers (Drepanididae), tanagers (Thraupi and their lifestyle is mainly connected with forest veg dae), icterids (Icteridae) and New World warblers etation and scrubland. However, desert and mountain (Parulidae). Consequently, the number of species in ous species also exist. the family could vary from 137 (e.g. Böhme and Flint, Some true finches are well familiar not only to biol 1994) to 993 (Sibley and Ahlquist, 1990). ogists, but to the general public as well. This family includes such species as chaffinches, goldfinches, The situation is further complicated by semantic siskins, bullfinches, crossbills, canaries etc. Many true ambiguities. The English word ‘finch’ and the German finches inhabit parks and gardens close to humans, word ‘Fink’ denote not only true finches, but is used have beautiful ornate plumage and superb vocal quali for more than one thousand species from other fami ties. It is thus somewhat puzzling that in spite of this lies: estrildid finches (Estrildidae), weavers, cardinals, popularity of true finches, their taxonomy and rela Darwin’s finches and some buntings. For this reason, tionships remain poorly studied and in a need of a the English vernacular name for Fringillidae is true revision. finches, and the German authors write of ‘eigentli Most handbooks on birds and taxonomic studies, chen Finken’, i.e. proper finches. At the same time, both from the 19th20th centuries and the recent ones, New World buntings (family Emberizidae) are called American sparrows, which sometimes leads to the 1 The article was translated by the author. ambiguous statement that sparrows are finches. 713 714 PAYEVSKY All that defines the aims of the current contribu anatomic studies in the 19th century, in particular the tion. They are to follow the controversial history of classic studies by E.H. Haeckel and T.H. Huxley, led to research into phylogeny and classification of true a significant progress in the field of avian systematics. finches and on the basis of recent molecular, morpho An important milestone was the Catalogue of Birds in logical, and biogeographic studies to define the main the British Museum by R.B. Sharpe, which diagnosed points of the current taxonomy of this group. families, subfamilies and genera. The first volume was published in 1874, and in the 12th volume (Sharpe, 1888) true finches included 97 genera and were MAIN STAGES OF HISTORY OF TRUE divided into three subfamilies: Fringillinae, Emberiz FINCHES CLASSIFICATION BEFORE inae and Coccothraustinae. However, the author THE PERIOD OF MOLECULAR STUDIES emphasized that no one had proposed a satisfactory In his classification of bird, Aristotle (4th century system of true finches. The subfamilies by Sharpe were B.C.) mentioned both insectivorous and herbivorous criticized by Ridgway (1901) as nonnatural groups. birds, and also true finches. Further attempts to con The latter author divided true finches into 18 groups: struct a system of birds, finches including, were based Fringillae, Loxiae, Pyrrhulae, Coccothrausteae etc. on external characters and similarities in body struc In the classic 19th century works on avian system ture, diet and behavior. They were made in publica atics by M. Fürbringer (1888) and H. Gadow (1893), tions of U. Aldrovandi, P. Belon, J. Ray, F. Willoughby, most passerines were considered closely related due to M. Brisson, G. Cuvier, B. Merrem, C.L. Nitzsch, their morphological similarity. Fürbringer lumped C.J. Temminck, J. Cabanis, C.L. Bonaparte, J.G. Gme them into just two families, but Gadow recognized lin, J.B. Lamarck, G.L. Buffon (the reviews: Karta among songbirds (Oscines) 28 families, true finches shev, 1974; Sibley and Ahlquist, 1990). A new era in among them. In his monograph on the birds of the systematics, based on binary taxonomy and hierarchi world, M. A. Menzbier (1909) considered true finches cal system of taxa, was started by the work of Carolus to be close to buntings, however mentioning signifi Linnaeus. In the 10th edition of his ‘Systema Naturae’ cant difference between these two families in jaw (Linnaeus, 1758) class birds and order passerines structure. Following Sharpe, Menzbier included all (Passeres) among species of the Old and the New true sparrows into true finches, but split hawfinches World include genus Fringilla L. with species like into a separate family Coccothraustidae, which also chaffinch, brambling, goldfinch, linnet, redpoll, siskin included greenfinches and cardinals. and serin, currently F. coelebs L., F. montifringilla L., A significant contribution to the systematics of true Carduelis carduelis (L.), Linaria cannabina (L.), finches was made by the studies of P.P. Sushkin. On the Acanthis flammea (L.), Spinus spinus (L.), Serinus basis of structure of syrinx, bony palate and external canaria (L.), respectively; and genus Loxia L. with morphology of horny palate Sushkin (1924, 1925) species crossbill, greenfinch, bullfinch, hawfinch and divided true finches into three large groups, Cardue pine grosbeak, currently L. curvirostra L., Chloris chlo line, Passerine and Emberizine. Cardueline consist of ris (L.), Pyrrhula pyrrhula (L.), Coccothraustes cocco three lineages with genera: 1—Fringilla L., 2—genera thraustes (L.), Pinicola enucleator (L.), respectively. of cardinals, 3—Carduelis Briss., Carpodacus Kaup After the introduction of a new taxon rank, family, and Coccothraustes Briss. Cardueline are closer related in the early 19th century, the name Fringillidae Leach to PloceoPasserine than to Emberizine, and Hawai 1820 starts to denote true finches. Different classifica ian honeycreepers are particularly close to Cardueline tions of North American birds in 1858–1872 included (Sushkin, 1929). As a result, Sushkin proposed the fol into this family true finches, American buntings lowing taxonomic decisions: superfamily Fringilloidei (= American sparrows), true sparrows and parrotbills consists of families Fringillidae (subfamilies Fringilli (Paradoxornis Gould). Species were distributed across nae, Carduelinae, Cardinalinae), Ploceidae (subfami subfamilies and cohorts mainly on the basis of their lies Passerinae, Viduinae, Ploceinae) and Drepanid external morphology: bill shape, tongue structure, idae, whereas superfamily Emberizoidei consists of number of primaries, form of wings, tail and legs families Icteridae, Coerebidae, Tanagridae and (Kartashev, 1974; Sibley and Ahlquist, 1990). At the Emberizidae. same time, the classification of oscine passerines by By the mid 20th century E. Stresemann (1959) Wallace (1874) was based solely on wing structure, believed that genuine phylogeny could never be stud with true finches
Recommended publications
  • Houbara Bustard and Saker Falcon Surveys In
    WILDLIFE SCIENCE AND CONSERVATION CENTER OF MONGOLIA Public Disclosure Authorized Houbara Bustard and Saker Falcon surveys in Galba Gobi IBA, southern Mongolia Preliminary technical report to the World Bank and BirdLife International Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Nyambayar Batbayar, Bayarjargal Batsukh Wildlife Science and Conservation Center of Mongolia Jonathan Stacey Birdlife International and Axel Bräunlich consultant Public Disclosure Authorized 11/09/2009 Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia 1 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Biodiversity issues in Mongolia’s South Gobi region .................................................................................. 3 Two globally threatened species under focus ............................................................................................... 4 Project aim .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Outputs .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Schedule of activities .................................................................................................................................... 6 Basic outline of Methods .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal 2017-C-15 Below)
    AOS Classification Committee – North and Middle America Proposal Set 2017-C 15 March 2017 No. Page Title 01 02 Revise the linear sequence of genera in Fringillidae, and transfer Serinus mozambicus to Crithagra 02 09 Split Brown Creeper (Certhia americana) into two species 03 16 Transfer Violet-bellied Hummingbird from Damophila to Juliamyia 04 18 Elevate Colaptes auratus mexicanoides to species rank 05 23 Split Nashville Warbler (Oreothlypis ruficapilla) into two species 06 26 Adopt new English names for Melozone biarcuata and Melozone cabanisi 07 29 Lump Thayer’s Gull (Larus thayeri) with Iceland Gull (Larus glaucoides) 08 43 Change the spelling of the English names of Le Conte’s Thrasher (Toxostoma lecontei) and Le Conte’s Sparrow (Ammodramus leconteii) 09 46 Add Common Scoter (Melanitta nigra) to the Main List 10 49 Add Blyth’s Reed Warbler (Acrocephalus dumetorum) to the Main List 11 52 Add Chatham Albatross (Thalassarche eremita) to the Main List 12 55 Add Red-legged Honeycreeper (Cyanerpes cyaneus) to the U.S. list 13 57 Add nine species recorded from Greenland to the Main List 14 68 Split Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii) into two species 1 2017-C-1 N&MA Classification Committee pp. 658-679 Revise the linear sequence of genera in Fringillidae, and transfer Serinus mozambicus to Crithagra Background: In the past decade, several phylogenetic papers have elucidated relationships within the Fringillidae (Arnaiz-Villena et al. 2007, 2008, Nguembock et al. 2009, Lerner et al. 2011, Zuccon et al. 2012). NACC already has taken a series of actions (reviewed below) based on this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Birding Eastern Anatolia Th Th 10 June to 20 June 2021 (11 Days)
    Turkey Birding Eastern Anatolia th th 10 June to 20 June 2021 (11 days) Caspian Snowcock by Alihan Vergiliel Turkey, a country the size of Texas, is a spectacular avian and cultural crossroads. This fascinating nation boasts an ancient history, from even before centuries of Greek Roman and Byzantine domination, through the 500-year Ottoman Empire and into the modern era. Needless to say, with such a pedigree the country holds some very impressive archaeological and cultural sites. Our tour of Eastern Turkey starts in the eastern city of Van, formerly known as Tuspa and 3,000 years ago the capital city of the Urartians. Today there are historical structures from the Seljuk and Ottoman periods, and Urartian artifacts can be seen at its archaeological museum. RBL Turkey Itinerary 2 However, it is the birds that are of primary interest to us as here, at the eastern limits of the Western Palearctic, we expect to find some very special and seldom-seen species, including Mountain ‘Caucasian’ Chiffchaff, Green Warbler, Mongolian Finch and Grey-headed Bunting. Around the shores of Lake Van we will seek out Moustached and Paddyfield Warblers in the dense reed beds, while on the lake itself, our targets include Marbled Teal, the threatened White-headed Duck, Dalmatian Pelican, Pygmy Cormorant and Armenian Gull, plus a selection of waders that may include Terek and Broad-billed Sandpiper. As we move further north-east into the steppe and semi desert areas, we will attempt to find Great Bustards and Demoiselle Cranes, with a potential supporting cast of Montagu’s Harrier, Steppe Eagle, the exquisite Citrine Wagtail and Twite, to name but a few.
    [Show full text]
  • MINOX - He São Tomé Grosbeak Neospiza the Link to Amblyospiza in 1962
    NEWS & VIEWS the grosbeak weighs twice as much as its suspected that it would be 101 years be- Martim captured another three individu- closest relative, further emphasising the fore it was rediscovered in August 1991 als near where Sinclair and Sargeant re- the world’s extent of its gigantism. by a group of birdwatchers that included discovered the species. The two sister species apparently di- Dave Sargeant and Ian Sinclair. During the past decade an increas- verged within the past million years, ing number of visits by birdwatchers THE grosbeak WEIGHS when São Tomé was experiencing signifi- have led to additional sightings, almost cant volcanic activity. The evolution of TWICE as MUCH as Its all in the same areas where the captures largest the grosbeak’s extreme phenotype in such CLosest RELatIVE, FUrtHER were made. Concerted survey efforts, a relatively short time span suggests that EMPHasISING THE EXTENT OF led by Ricardo Lima and BirdLife Inter- strong natural selection drove the mor- Its GIGANTISM national, have resulted in a better un- phological divergence of the two species, derstanding of the species’ distribution canary presumably to allow their co-existence by The fact that two of the three specimens on the island (https://doi.org/10.1017/ targeting different food items, and hence collected by Newton were lost in the 1978 S0959270916000241). SÃO TOMÉ GROSBEAK reduce interspecific competition. Selec- fire that destroyed the Natural History The grosbeak is without doubt the most tion appears to have been most marked Museum in Lisbon served to deepen the difficult-to-observe bird on São Tomé and on the proto-grosbeak population, as the aura of mystery surrounding this spe- although it is clear that it depends on pri- seedeaters on São Tomé differ little from cies, long thought to be extinct and now mary forest, no clear pattern of habitat those found on Príncipe and Boné de classified as Critically Endangered.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeography of Finches and Sparrows
    In: Animal Genetics ISBN: 978-1-60741-844-3 Editor: Leopold J. Rechi © 2009 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chapter 1 PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF FINCHES AND SPARROWS Antonio Arnaiz-Villena*, Pablo Gomez-Prieto and Valentin Ruiz-del-Valle Department of Immunology, University Complutense, The Madrid Regional Blood Center, Madrid, Spain. ABSTRACT Fringillidae finches form a subfamily of songbirds (Passeriformes), which are presently distributed around the world. This subfamily includes canaries, goldfinches, greenfinches, rosefinches, and grosbeaks, among others. Molecular phylogenies obtained with mitochondrial DNA sequences show that these groups of finches are put together, but with some polytomies that have apparently evolved or radiated in parallel. The time of appearance on Earth of all studied groups is suggested to start after Middle Miocene Epoch, around 10 million years ago. Greenfinches (genus Carduelis) may have originated at Eurasian desert margins coming from Rhodopechys obsoleta (dessert finch) or an extinct pale plumage ancestor; it later acquired green plumage suitable for the greenfinch ecological niche, i.e.: woods. Multicolored Eurasian goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis) has a genetic extant ancestor, the green-feathered Carduelis citrinella (citril finch); this was thought to be a canary on phonotypical bases, but it is now included within goldfinches by our molecular genetics phylograms. Speciation events between citril finch and Eurasian goldfinch are related with the Mediterranean Messinian salinity crisis (5 million years ago). Linurgus olivaceus (oriole finch) is presently thriving in Equatorial Africa and was included in a separate genus (Linurgus) by itself on phenotypical bases. Our phylograms demonstrate that it is and old canary. Proposed genus Acanthis does not exist. Twite and linnet form a separate radiation from redpolls.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa: Magoebaskloof and Kruger National Park Custom Tour Trip Report
    SOUTH AFRICA: MAGOEBASKLOOF AND KRUGER NATIONAL PARK CUSTOM TOUR TRIP REPORT 24 February – 2 March 2019 By Jason Boyce This Verreaux’s Eagle-Owl showed nicely one late afternoon, puffing up his throat and neck when calling www.birdingecotours.com [email protected] 2 | TRIP REPORT South Africa: Magoebaskloof and Kruger National Park February 2019 Overview It’s common knowledge that South Africa has very much to offer as a birding destination, and the memory of this trip echoes those sentiments. With an itinerary set in one of South Africa’s premier birding provinces, the Limpopo Province, we were getting ready for a birding extravaganza. The forests of Magoebaskloof would be our first stop, spending a day and a half in the area and targeting forest special after forest special as well as tricky range-restricted species such as Short-clawed Lark and Gurney’s Sugarbird. Afterwards we would descend the eastern escarpment and head into Kruger National Park, where we would make our way to the northern sections. These included Punda Maria, Pafuri, and the Makuleke Concession – a mouthwatering birding itinerary that was sure to deliver. A pair of Woodland Kingfishers in the fever tree forest along the Limpopo River Detailed Report Day 1, 24th February 2019 – Transfer to Magoebaskloof We set out from Johannesburg after breakfast on a clear Sunday morning. The drive to Polokwane took us just over three hours. A number of birds along the way started our trip list; these included Hadada Ibis, Yellow-billed Kite, Southern Black Flycatcher, Village Weaver, and a few brilliant European Bee-eaters.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinamiformes – Falconiformes
    LIST OF THE 2,008 BIRD SPECIES (WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ENGLISH NAMES) KNOWN FROM THE A.O.U. CHECK-LIST AREA. Notes: "(A)" = accidental/casualin A.O.U. area; "(H)" -- recordedin A.O.U. area only from Hawaii; "(I)" = introducedinto A.O.U. area; "(N)" = has not bred in A.O.U. area but occursregularly as nonbreedingvisitor; "?" precedingname = extinct. TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Tinamus major Great Tinamou. Nothocercusbonapartei Highland Tinamou. Crypturellus soui Little Tinamou. Crypturelluscinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou. Crypturellusboucardi Slaty-breastedTinamou. Crypturellus kerriae Choco Tinamou. GAVIIFORMES GAVIIDAE Gavia stellata Red-throated Loon. Gavia arctica Arctic Loon. Gavia pacifica Pacific Loon. Gavia immer Common Loon. Gavia adamsii Yellow-billed Loon. PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptusdominicus Least Grebe. Podilymbuspodiceps Pied-billed Grebe. ?Podilymbusgigas Atitlan Grebe. Podicepsauritus Horned Grebe. Podicepsgrisegena Red-neckedGrebe. Podicepsnigricollis Eared Grebe. Aechmophorusoccidentalis Western Grebe. Aechmophorusclarkii Clark's Grebe. PROCELLARIIFORMES DIOMEDEIDAE Thalassarchechlororhynchos Yellow-nosed Albatross. (A) Thalassarchecauta Shy Albatross.(A) Thalassarchemelanophris Black-browed Albatross. (A) Phoebetriapalpebrata Light-mantled Albatross. (A) Diomedea exulans WanderingAlbatross. (A) Phoebastriaimmutabilis Laysan Albatross. Phoebastrianigripes Black-lootedAlbatross. Phoebastriaalbatrus Short-tailedAlbatross. (N) PROCELLARIIDAE Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar. Pterodroma neglecta KermadecPetrel. (A) Pterodroma
    [Show full text]
  • Avibase Page 1Of 6
    Avibase Page 1of 6 Col Location Date Start time Duration Distance Avibase - Bird Checklists of the World 1 Country or region: Bwindi Impenetrable National Park 2 Number of species: 588 3 Number of endemics: 0 4 Number of breeding endemics: 0 5 Number of introduced species: 1 Recommended citation: Lepage, D. 2021. Checklist of the birds of Bwindi Impenetrable National Park. Avibase, the world bird database. Retrieved from .https://avibase.bsc- eoc.org/checklist.jsp?lang=EN&region=ug04uu01&list=howardmoore&format=2 [12/05/2021]. Make your observations count! Submit your data to ebird.org - Legend: [x] accidental [ex] extirpated [EX] extinct [EW] extinct in the wild [E] endemic [e] endemic (country/region) Egyptian Goose Tambourine Dove Black Cuckoo Hottentot Teal Namaqua Dove African Cuckoo African Black Duck Montane Nightjar African Crake Red-billed Teal Mottled Spinetailed Swift Black Crake Comb Duck Cassin's Spinetailed Swift White-spotted Flufftail Helmeted Guineafowl Scarce Swift Buff-spotted Flufftail Crested Guineafowl African Palm Swift Red-chested Flufftail Blue Quail Alpine Swift African Finfoot Scaly Francolin Mottled Swift Grey Crowned Crane Red-necked Spurfowl White-rumped Swift Great Blue Turaco Handsome Francolin Horus Swift Eastern Grey Plantain-eater Crested Francolin Little Swift Bare-faced Go-away-bird Ring-necked Francolin African Swift Ruwenzori Turaco Little Grebe Common Swift Black-billed Turaco Speckled Pigeon Blue-headed Coucal Ross's Turaco Afep Pigeon White-browed Coucal Marabou African Olive Pigeon African Black
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationships of the Hawaiian Honeycreepers (Drepaninini) As Indicated by Dna-Dna Hybridization
    THE RELATIONSHIPS OF THE HAWAIIAN HONEYCREEPERS (DREPANININI) AS INDICATED BY DNA-DNA HYBRIDIZATION CH^RrES G. SIBLEY AND Jo• E. AHLQUIST Departmentof Biologyand PeabodyMuseum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511 USA ABSTRACT.--Twenty-twospecies of Hawaiian honeycreepers(Fringillidae: Carduelinae: Drepaninini) are known. Their relationshipsto other groups of passefineswere examined by comparing the single-copyDNA sequencesof the Apapane (Himationesanguinea) with those of 5 speciesof carduelinefinches, 1 speciesof Fringilla, 15 speciesof New World nine- primaried oscines(Cardinalini, Emberizini, Thraupini, Parulini, Icterini), and members of 6 other families of oscines(Turdidae, Monarchidae, Dicaeidae, Sylviidae, Vireonidae, Cor- vidae). The DNA-DNA hybridization data support other evidence indicating that the Hawaiian honeycreepersshared a more recent common ancestorwith the cardue!ine finches than with any of the other groupsstudied and indicate that this divergenceoccurred in the mid-Miocene, 15-20 million yr ago. The colonizationof the Hawaiian Islandsby the ancestralspecies that radiated to produce the Hawaiian honeycreeperscould have occurredat any time between 20 and 5 million yr ago. Becausethe honeycreeperscaptured so many ecologicalniches, however, it seemslikely that their ancestor was the first passefine to become established in the islands and that it arrived there at the time of, or soon after, its separationfrom the carduelinelineage. If so, this colonist arrived before the present islands from Hawaii to French Frigate Shoal were formed by the volcanic"hot-spot" now under the island of Hawaii. Therefore,the ancestral drepaninine may have colonizedone or more of the older Hawaiian Islandsand/or Emperor Seamounts,which also were formed over the "hot-spot" and which reachedtheir present positions as the result of tectonic crustal movement.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Bibliographie Des Fringilles, Commentée Et Ponctuellement Mise À Jour. Index Des Noms Scientifiques, Français, Anglais
    BIBLIOGRAPHIE DES FRINGILLES, COMMENTÉE ET PONCTUELLEMENT MISE À JOUR. INDEX DES NOMS SCIENTIFIQUES, FRANÇAIS, ANGLAIS. I N D E X T H É M A T I Q U E INDEX OF SCIENTIFIC, FRENCH AND ENGLISH NAMES OF FINCHES T H E M E S’ I N D E X (126 different themes). INDEX DES NOMS D’AUTEURS (126 thèmes différents). A U T H O R’S I N D E X E S ====================================================== Elle comprend douze fichiers suivant détail ci-après / That bibliography includes twelve files devoted to the following genera: Becs-croisés du genre Loxia soit les Becs-croisés d’Ecosse, bifascié, d’Haïti, perroquet et des sapins ; (Crossbills of the genus Loxia ; les Bouvreuils du genre Pyrrhula (Bullfinches of the genus Pyrrhula) ; les Chardonnerets élégant et à tête grise du genre Carduelis, les Chardonnerets nord-américains, Black-headed and Grey-headed Goldfinches of the genus and species Carduelis carduelis as well as the Goldfinches of North America ; les Gros-becs du genre Coccothraustes (Hawfinches of the genus Coccothraustes, former genera Hesperiphona, Mycerobas,Eophona) ; toutes les espèces de Linottes (Linnets of the world) ; Les Pinsons bleu, des arbres et du Nord (All the species of Chaffinches of the genus Fringilla) ; Les Roselins des genres Carpodacus, Leucosticte, Urocynchramus (Rosyfinches of the genera Carpodacus, Leucosticte, Urocynchramus) ; Le Serin cini, les Serins africains et asiatiques du genre Serinus ; les Venturons montagnard et de Corse (The Serin and african, asiatic Serins of the Genera Serinus, Alario, Citril and Corsican
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Baseline Study of Avian Fauna of Sukkur Riverine Forests, Sindh, Pakistan
    Report on Baseline study of Avian Fauna of Sukkur Riverine Forests, Sindh, Pakistan Project title: Sustainable forest management to secure multiple benefits in Pakistan's high conservation value forests 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. CONTENTS PAGE # 2. List of Figures and Tables 02 3. Project Brief 03 4. Summary 07 5. Introduction 08 6. Methodology 10 7. Results & Discussion 12 8. Threats and Recommendation 15 9. References 16 List of Figures and Tables 1 Fig. 1. Map of Study Area 11 2 Fig. 2. Order Wise Species Richness Recorded From Study 13 Area 3 Fig. 3. Family Wise Species Richness Recorded From 14 Study Area 1 Table 1. Checklist of Avian Fauna Recorded From Study 18 Area 2 Project Brief Project Title: Sustainable forest management to secure multiple benefits in Pakistan's high conservation value forestss Duration: Five years (January 2017 to December 2021) Project Areas: i). Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (Temperate forest) ii). Sind (Riverine forest) iii. Punjab (Scrub forest and Riverine forest) Project objective: The objective of the proposed project is to promote sustainable forest management in Pakistan's Western Himalayan Temperate coniferous, Sub-tropical broadleaved evergreen thorn (Scrub) and Riverine forests for biodiversity conservation, mitigation of climate change and securing of forest ecosystem services. In particular, it aims at implementation of three inter-related and mutually complementary components that are focussed at addressing the barriers of inadequate planning, regulatory and institutional frameworks to integrated forest resource
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan
    NEPA Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan An Output of the National Capacity Needs Self-Assessment for Global Environment Management (NCSA) for Afghanistan June 2008 United Nations Environment Programme Post-Conflict and Disaster Management Branch First published in Kabul in 2008 by the United Nations Environment Programme. Copyright © 2008, United Nations Environment Programme. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. United Nations Environment Programme Darulaman Kabul, Afghanistan Tel: +93 (0)799 382 571 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.unep.org DISCLAIMER The contents of this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of UNEP, or contributory organizations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Unless otherwise credited, all the photos in this publication have been taken by the UNEP staff. Design and Layout: Rachel Dolores
    [Show full text]