DOCSLIB.ORG

Case 1:14-Cv-02811-JMF Document 252 Filed 11/24/14 Page 1 of 146

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Case 1:14-Cv-02811-JMF Document 252 Filed 11/24/14 Page 1 of 146 Case 1:14-cv-02811-JMF Document 252 Filed 11/24/14 Page 1 of 146 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x CITY OF PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND, : Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-02811-JMF PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS : (Consolidated) NATIONAL PENSION FUND, : EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF : CLASS ACTION THE GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN : ISLANDS, STATE-BOSTON RETIREMENT : SECOND CONSOLIDATED AMENDED SYSTEM, AND FÖRSTA AP-FONDEN : COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE Individually and on Behalf of All Others : FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS Similarly Situated, : : Plaintiffs, : : DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL vs. : : BATS GLOBAL MARKETS, INC., : CHICAGO STOCK EXCHANGE, INC., : DIRECT EDGE ECN, LLC, THE NASDAQ : STOCK MARKET LLC, NASDAQ OMX BX, x INC., NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, LLC, NYSE ARCA, INC., BARCLAYS PLC, BARCLAYS CAPITAL, INC., Defendants. Case 1:14-cv-02811-JMF Document 252 Filed 11/24/14 Page 2 of 146 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS ..................................................................................................1 Defendants’ Scheme and Wrongful Course of Business .........................................................4 JURISDICTION AND VENUE ......................................................................................................8 PARTIES .........................................................................................................................................8 Plaintiffs ...................................................................................................................................8 The Exchange Defendants .....................................................................................................10 The Dark Pool Defendants .....................................................................................................13 CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS ..............................................................................................14 FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS ........................................................................................................16 The Recent Evolution of U.S.-Based Public Stock Markets..................................................16 The Proliferation of Dark Pools .............................................................................................22 The Rise of High Frequency Trading ....................................................................................24 Plaintiffs and the Class Justifiably Relied on the Fairness and Integrity of the Exchanges as Markets ............................................................................................................33 The Exchanges’ Manipulative Scheme to Defraud................................................................37 The Exchanges Mislead Investors to Induce Them to Trade Against HFT ...................37 NASDAQ ...............................................................................................................37 NYSE .....................................................................................................................39 BATS ......................................................................................................................41 Direct Edge .............................................................................................................43 CHX .......................................................................................................................45 The Exchanges Reap Massive Profits by Providing Co-Location and Low- Latency Enhanced Data Feed Services to HFT Firms ...................................................48 Co-Location ............................................................................................................49 - i - Case 1:14-cv-02811-JMF Document 252 Filed 11/24/14 Page 3 of 146 Page Direct and Enhanced Feeds ....................................................................................57 The Exchanges’ Discriminatory Fee Structure ......................................................64 The Exchanges Create Complex Order Types Designed for HFT Firms to Prey on Investor Orders .........................................................................................67 “Hide and Light” Orders ................................................................................74 Direct Edge: Hide Not Slide (+ ALO) ...................................................77 NASDAQ: Price to Comply and Post Only + “Automatic Re- Entry” .....................................................................................................80 BATS: BATS Only Post Only ...............................................................83 ARCA: Post No Preference ALO Blind (“ALO PNP B”) .....................85 CHX .......................................................................................................86 Intermarket Sweep Order Types ....................................................................88 The Day ISO Order Type ...............................................................................88 The Post-Only ISO Order Type .....................................................................91 BATS (BYX/BZX) ................................................................................96 Direct Edge (EDGX/EDGA) ..................................................................98 CHX .......................................................................................................99 NASDAQ/NASDAQ BX .....................................................................104 Flash Orders .................................................................................................105 The Exchanges’ Manipulative Scheme Damaged Plaintiffs and the Class .........................108 Electronic Front-Running ............................................................................................109 Rebate Arbitrage ..........................................................................................................111 Latency Arbitrage ........................................................................................................113 Spoofing and Layering .................................................................................................113 - ii - Case 1:14-cv-02811-JMF Document 252 Filed 11/24/14 Page 4 of 146 Page Like the Exchanges, Barclays Also Engaged in a Manipulative Scheme to Defraud Through Its Dark Pool .........................................................................................................114 Barclays’s Dark Pool (Barclays LX) ...........................................................................116 Investors Justifiably Relied on the Fairness and Integrity of Barclays’s Dark Pool as a Market ...........................................................................................................118 The Regulatory Framework Governing Dark Pools Requires Fairness ...............118 Barclays’s Public Statements Failed to Dispel – and in Fact Encouraged – Investors’ Belief in the Fairness and Integrity of Barclays’s Dark Pool ..............122 In Furtherence of Its Manipulative Scheme, Barclays Operated Its Dark Pool for Its Own Benefit and that of HFT Firms at the Expense of Investors .....................125 Barclays’s “Liquidity Profiling” Does Not Protect Investors from Predatory HFT Trading Tactics ...........................................................................125 Rather than Protecting Investors from HFT Firms in Its Dark Pool, Barclays Actively Courted HFT Firms ................................................................126 Defendants’ Scheme and Fraudulent Course of Business Have Led to Governmental Investigations and Penalties .................................................................................................128 The Exchanges’ Conduct Is Not Shielded by SRO Immunity .............................................132 COUNT I Violation of §10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 Against All Defendants ...................................................................................................................................135 COUNT II Violation of §6(b) of the Exchange Act Against the Exchanges ..............................137 PRAYER FOR RELIEF ..............................................................................................................139 JURY DEMAND .........................................................................................................................140 - iii - Case 1:14-cv-02811-JMF Document 252 Filed 11/24/14 Page 5 of 146 SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS 1. This securities class action is brought on behalf of public investors who purchased and/or sold shares of stock in the United States between April 18, 2009 and the present (the “Class Period”) on a registered public stock exchange generated by defendants (collectively, the “Exchanges”)1 or on the alternative trading venue operated by Barclays PLC through its subsidiary Barclays Capital, Inc. (collectively, “Barclays”) identified herein (the Exchanges and Barclays, collectively, the “Defendants”), and were injured as a result of the misconduct detailed herein (the “Class”). 2. This case arises out of a scheme and wrongful course of business whereby the Exchanges and Barclays employed devices, contrivances, manipulations and artifices to defraud in a manner that was designed to and did manipulate the U.S. securities markets and the trading of equities on those markets, diverting billions of dollars annually from buyers and sellers
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ethics in Financial Markets
    Chapter Five Ethics in Financial Markets Anything that can be owned can be traded, and if trading in something is frequent, a market probably exists for that purpose. This holds true not only for commodities and valuable objects, such as pork bellies and French Impres- sionist paintings, but also for financial instruments of all kinds. However, unlike pork bellies, which can be carved up and packaged only in limited ways, financial instruments can take a wide variety of forms for trade in many dif- ferent markets. With puts and calls, swaps and strips, and a host of other colorfully named instruments, the possibilities for trading in financial markets are limited only by human inventiveness and the constraints of law—which may often be gotten around with even more inventiveness. The broad aim of financial market regulation is to secure “fair and orderly markets” or “just and equitable principles of trade.” These expressions, which are standard in securities law and market rules, combine the economic value of efficiency with an ethical concern for fairness or equity, thereby giving rise to the familiar equity/efficiency trade-off. When applied to markets, the concepts of fairness, justice, and equity (which are roughly synonyms) serve mainly to forbid fraud and manipulation, the violation of certain rights, and the exploitation of asymmetries in such matters as information and bargaining power. Prohibitions of unfair market practices are designed to protect both market participants and the integrity of markets themselves, which cannot function properly when they lack fairness. In addition to an examination of what constitutes fairness in markets, this chapter examines three specific areas where unfairness is often alleged.
    [Show full text]
  • I Mercati Veloci: Il Trading Ad Alta Frequenza
    Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Economia e Finanza (Ordinamento ex D.M. 270/2004) Tesi di Laurea Magistrale I Mercati veloci: il Trading ad Alta Frequenza Relatore Ch. Prof. Marcella LUCCHETTA Correlatore Ch. Prof. Antonio PARADISO Laureando Francesco CARUZZO Matricola 842173 Anno Accademico 2016 / 2017 INDICE INTRODUZIONE…………………………………………………………...…………………4 CAPITOLO I EVOLUZIONE DEL TRADING ELETTRONICO 1.1 Evoluzione storica ed informatizzazione del Trading…………………….……………6 1.2 Drivers dello sviluppo del AT/HFT………………………………………….…………...8 1.3 Flash Crash: 6 Maggio 2010………………………………………………...…………….12 CAPITOLO II HIGH FREQUENCY TRADING: DEFINIZIONI E CONCETTI CONNESSI 2.1 Trading algoritmico……………………………………………...………………………..14 2.2 High Frequency Trading………………………………………..………………………..16 2.3 Concetti connessi……………………………………………………….…………………20 2.2.1 Market making…………………………………………………..…………………20 2.2.2 Quantitative Portfolio Management (QPM)…………………………………….21 2.2.3 Smart Order Routing (SOR)………………………………………………………23 CAPITOLO III STRATEGIE HIGH FREQUENCY TRADING 3.1 Strategie passive……………………………………………………………….………….26 3.2 Strategie aggressive……………………………………………………………….………33 3.2.1 Politiche riguardanti le strategie HF aggressive……………………….……….38 2 CAPITOLO IV IMPATTI POSITIVI E POSSIBILI EFFETTI NEGATIVI DEL HIGH FREQUENCY TRADING 4.1 Impatti positivi del Trading ad Alta Frequenza…………………………….…………42 4.2 Impatti negativi del Trading ad Alta Frequenza………………………………………47 CAPITOLO V TREND E PROFITTABILITA’ DEL TRADING AD ALTA FREQUENZA 5.1 Order to Trade Ratio (OTR)…………………………………………………...…………57
    [Show full text]
  • December 15, 2020 Chairman Jay
    December 15, 2020 Chairman Jay Clayton U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street NE Washington, D.C. 20549-5990. Re: Request for Investigation of Senator Kelly Loeffler Dear Chairman Clayton, I respectfully request that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or the “Commission”) immediately investigate potential violations of federal securities law and SEC regulations by Senator Kelly Loeffler and notify the public of the investigation. Recent transaction reports and company statements demonstrate that United States Senator Kelly Loeffler may have used nonpublic information related to COVID-19 economic relief legislation for her own financial gain in violation of federal law. Under federal securities law, members of Congress owe a duty “arising from a relationship of trust . to the Congress, the United States Government, and the citizens of the United States,” with respect to material nonpublic information obtained through a Member’s public service.1 It is difficult to imagine a more profound violation of the public trust than the use of nonpublic information on Congress’s emergency response to a global pandemic in order to enhance a Senator’s own personal wealth. Senator Loeffler has been mired in allegations and investigations related to her and her husband’s extraordinarily well-timed financial investments at the start of the pandemic. While her constituents faced an unprecedented threat to their health and welfare, Senator Loeffler profited off the pandemic in the stock market. Recent reports and transactional analysis provide strong evidence to suggest that Senator Loeffler used nonpublic information acquired through her official Senate duties to inform financial security transactions that she personally benefited from.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Regulation in Shaping Equity Market Structure and Electronic Trading
    S. HRG. 113–478 THE ROLE OF REGULATION IN SHAPING EQUITY MARKET STRUCTURE AND ELECTRONIC TRADING HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON EXAMINING THE INFLUENCE OF REGULATION ON THE GROWTH OF MARKET STRUCTURE, THE SYSTEMS AND OPERATION OF MARKET PARTICIPANTS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS PRACTICES RE- LATED TO HIGH-FREQUENCY TRADING, ELECTRONIC MARKETS AND AUTOMATED TRADING JULY 8, 2014 Printed for the use of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs ( Available at: http://www.fdsys.gov/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 91–300 PDF WASHINGTON : 2015 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 11:05 Mar 18, 2015 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\DOCS\91300.TXT SHERYL BANKI-41578DSA with DISTILLER COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota, Chairman JACK REED, Rhode Island MIKE CRAPO, Idaho CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey BOB CORKER, Tennessee SHERROD BROWN, Ohio DAVID VITTER, Louisiana JON TESTER, Montana MIKE JOHANNS, Nebraska MARK R. WARNER, Virginia PATRICK J. TOOMEY, Pennsylvania JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon MARK KIRK, Illinois KAY HAGAN, North Carolina JERRY MORAN, Kansas JOE MANCHIN III, West Virginia TOM COBURN, Oklahoma ELIZABETH
    [Show full text]
  • High-Frequency Trading and the Flash Crash: Structural Weaknesses in the Securities Markets and Proposed Regulatory Responses Ian Poirier
    Hastings Business Law Journal Volume 8 Article 5 Number 2 Summer 2012 Summer 1-1-2012 High-Frequency Trading and the Flash Crash: Structural Weaknesses in the Securities Markets and Proposed Regulatory Responses Ian Poirier Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_business_law_journal Part of the Business Organizations Law Commons Recommended Citation Ian Poirier, High-Frequency Trading and the Flash Crash: Structural Weaknesses in the Securities Markets and Proposed Regulatory Responses, 8 Hastings Bus. L.J. 445 (2012). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_business_law_journal/vol8/iss2/5 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Business Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. High-Frequency Trading and the Flash Crash: Structural Weaknesses in the Securities Markets and Proposed Regulatory Responses Ian Poirier* I. INTRODUCTION On May 6th, 2010, a single trader in Kansas City was either lazy or sloppy in executing a large trade on the E-Mini futures market.1 Twenty minutes later, the broad U.S. securities markets were down almost a trillion dollars, losing at their lowest point more than nine percent of their value.2 Certain stocks lost nearly all of their value from just minutes before.3 Faced with the blistering pace of the decline, many market participants opted to cease trading entirely, including both human traders and High Frequency Trading (“HFT”) programs.4 This withdrawal of liquidity5 accelerated the crash, as fewer buyers were able to absorb the rapid-fire selling pressure of the HFT programs.6 Within two hours, prices were back * J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Flash Crash of May 2010: Accident Or Market Manipulation? Chris Rose, Capella University, USA
    Journal of Business & Economics Research – January, 2011 Volume 9, Number 1 The Flash Crash Of May 2010: Accident Or Market Manipulation? Chris Rose, Capella University, USA ABSTRACT On May 6th., 2010, the Dow fell about a thousand points in a half hour and Wall Street lost $800 billion of value. Some claim that it was just an isolated incident and there was nothing nefarious but with the majority of trading being done by electronic exchanges and with the increase in High Frequency Trading, evidence is emerging that the crash just might have been a case of deliberate manipulations of the market. Keywords: Flash crash; market manipulation; SEC; NYSE BACKGOUND tock markets today are very different from the first organized stock exchange, which was created in 1792 at Wall Street, New York. There a small group of financial leaders signed an agreement on fees, rules and S regulations that would apply in transactions. Every day securities were auctioned and the seller paid a commission on each stock or bond sold. These trades took place in a free and open market where willing buyers and sellers assembled and freely exchanged goods, services and information. Since 1998, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) authorized the formation of electronic exchanges, so that anyone with a computer can compete within established markets such as the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). About 97% of NYSE trades today are executed by computers on electronic communication networks (ECNs) which in the last decade have quickly replaced traders, trading on floors as the main global venue for buying and selling every asset, derivative, and contract (Stokes, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT of NEW YORK X CITY of PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND, Individually and on Behalf of Al
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x CITY OF PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND, : Civil Action No. Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly: Situated, : CLASS ACTION : Plaintiff, : COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE : FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS vs. : : BATS GLOBAL MARKETS, INC., BOX : OPTIONS EXCHANGE LLC, CHICAGO : BOARD OPTIONS EXCHANGE, INC., : CHICAGO STOCK EXCHANGE, INC., C2 : OPTIONS EXCHANGE, INC., DIRECT EDGE : ECN, LLC, INTERNATIONAL SECURITIES : EXCHANGE HOLDINGS, INC., THE NASDAQ : STOCK MARKET LLC, NASDAQ OMX BX, : INC., NASDAQ OMX PHLX, LLC, NATIONAL : STOCK EXCHANGE, INC., NEW YORK : STOCK EXCHANGE, LLC, NYSE ARCA, : INC., ONECHICAGO, LLC, BANK OF : AMERICA CORPORATION, BARCLAYS PLC, : CITIGROUP INC., CREDIT SUISSE GROUP : AG, DEUTSCHE BANK AG, THE GOLDMAN : SACHS GROUP, INC., JPMORGAN CHASE & : CO., MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC, UBS : AG, THE CHARLES SCHWAB : CORPORATION, E*TRADE FINANCIAL : CORPORATION, FMR, LLC, FIDELITY : BROKERAGE SERVICES, LLC, SCOTTRADE : FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., TD : AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION, : CITADEL LLC, DRW HOLDINGS, LLC, GTS : SECURITIES, LLC, HUDSON RIVER : TRADING LLC, JUMP TRADING, LLC, KCG : HOLDINGS, INC., QUANTLAB FINANCIAL : LLC, TOWER RESEARCH CAPITAL LLC, : TRADEBOT SYSTEMS, INC., TRADEWORX : INC., VIRTU FINANCIAL INC. and CHOPPER : TRADING, LLC, : : Defendants. : x DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL SUMMARY OF THE COMPLAINT 1. This securities class action is brought on behalf of public investors who purchased and/or sold shares of stock in the United States between April 18, 2009 and the present (the “Class Period”) on a registered public stock exchange (the “Exchange Defendants”) or a United States- based alternate trading venue and were injured as a result of the misconduct detailed herein (the “Plaintiff Class”). 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Pools and High Frequency Trading for Dummies
    Dark Pools & High Frequency Trading by Jay Vaananen Dark Pools & High Frequency Trading For Dummies® Published by: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, www.wiley.com This edition first published 2015 © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, West Sussex. Registered office John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or trans- mitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. Wiley publishes in a variety of print and electronic formats and by print-on-demand. Some material included with standard print versions of this book may not be included in e-books or in print-on-demand. If this book refers to media such as a CD or DVD that is not included in the version you purchased, you may download this material at http://booksupport.wiley.com. For more information about Wiley products, visit www.wiley.com. Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor men- tioned in this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling and Mitigation of Flash Crashes
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Modelling and mitigation of Flash Crashes Fry, John and Serbera, Jean-Philippe School of Computing Mathematics and Digital Technology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Sheffield Business School, Sheffield Hallam University 12 September 2017 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/82457/ MPRA Paper No. 82457, posted 08 Nov 2017 22:35 UTC Modelling and mitigation of Flash Crashes September 2017 Abstract The algorithmic trading revolution has had a dramatic effect upon markets. Trading has become faster, and in some ways more efficient, though potentially at the cost higher volatility and increased uncertainty. Stories of predatory trading and flash crashes constitute a new financial reality. Worryingly, highly capitalised stocks may be particularly vulnerable to flash crashes. Amid fears of high-risk technology failures in the global financial system we develop a model for flash crashes. Though associated with extreme forms of illiquidity and market concentration flash crashes appear to be unpredictable in advance. Several measures may mitigate flash crash risk such as reducing the market impact of individual trades and limiting the profitability of high-frequency and predatory trading strategies. JEL Classification: C1 F3 G1 K2 Keywords: Flash Crashes; Flash Rallies; Econophysics; Regulation 1 Introduction Algorithmic Trading (AT) incorporates a range of high speed and predatory strategies termed Flash Trading Strategies by Lewis (2014) in recognition of the sheer speed involved – orders of magnitude faster than the blink of a human eye. Searching for a competitive edge the need for speed even led to the construction of new optic fibre tunnels to shorten the network distance between New York and Chicago to save crucial milliseconds.
    [Show full text]
  • Chair Mary Jo White, April 10, 2013 to December 31, 2013
    Chair Mary Jo White Public Calendar April 10, 2013 to December 31, 2013 Wednesday, April 10 2013 9:00 am Oath of Office 10:00 am Open Commission Meeting 11:30 am Meeting with staff 12:30 pm Meeting with job applicant 1:30 pm Meeting with staff 2:30 pm Meeting with staff 3:30 pm Meeting with staff 4:00 pm Meeting with staff 4:30 pm Meeting with staff Thursday, April 11 2013 9:00 am Meeting with staff 9:30 am Meeting with staff 10:00 am Meeting with staff 11:30 am Meeting with Commissioner Parades 12:30 pm Meeting with Commissioner Gallagher 1:40 pm Meeting with staff 2:00 pm Closed Commission Meeting 3:30 pm Meeting with staff 4:00 pm Meeting with staff Friday, April 12 2013 9:00 am Meeting with staff 10:00 am Meeting with Commissioner Walter and staff 10:30 am Swearing‐in Ceremony 12:00 pm Meeting with Russell Golden, Chair, Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) 1:00 pm Meeting with staff Monday, April 15 2013 9:30 am Meeting with staff 10:30 am Meeting with staff 11:00 am Meeting with staff 1 11:15 am Phone call with staff 11:30 am Meeting with staff 12:00 pm Phone call with Jim Doty, Chairman, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) 12:45 pm Phone call with staff 1:00 pm Meeting with staff 2:00 pm Meeting with staff 3:00 pm Meeting with staff 4:00 pm Meeting with staff 4:30 pm Meeting with staff 5:00 pm Meeting with staff 5:05 pm Phone call with Gary Gensler, Chairman, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) 5:45 pm Phone call with Congressman Scott Garrett Tuesday, April 16 2013 9:00 am Meeting with staff 10:00
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Market Speculation in Rising Oil and Gas Prices: a Need to Put the Cop Back on the Beat
    1 109th Congress S. PRT. " ! 2nd Session SENATE 109–65 THE ROLE OF MARKET SPECULATION IN RISING OIL AND GAS PRICES: A NEED TO PUT THE COP BACK ON THE BEAT STAFF REPORT PREPARED BY THE PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE JUNE 27, 2006 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 28–640 WASHINGTON : 2006 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 09:54 Aug 01, 2006 Jkt 028640 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5012 Sfmt 5012 C:\DOCS\28640.TXT SAFFAIRS PsN: PAT congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS SUSAN M. COLLINS, Maine, Chairman TED STEVENS, Alaska JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio CARL LEVIN, Michigan NORM COLEMAN, Minnesota DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii TOM COBURN, Oklahoma THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware LINCOLN D. CHAFEE, Rhode Island MARK DAYTON, Minnesota ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah FRANK LAUTENBERG, New Jersey PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico MARK PRYOR, Arkansas JOHN W. WARNER, Virginia MICHAEL D. BOPP, Staff Director and Chief Counsel JOYCE A. RECHTSCHAFFEN, Minority Staff Director and Chief Counsel TRINA DRIESSNACK TYRER, Chief Clerk PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS NORM COLEMAN, Minnesota, Chairman TED STEVENS, Alaska CARL LEVIN, Michigan TOM COBURN, Oklahoma DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii LINCOLN D. CHAFEE, Rhode Island THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah MARK DAYTON, Minnesota PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico FRANK LAUTENBERG, New Jersey JOHN W.
    [Show full text]
  • O'brien Financial Advisors
    Del Principe | O’Brien Financial Advisors LLC Vol. VI No. III: X.MMXX ​ October 2020 Dear Fellow Investors, “Just keep in mind: the more we value things outside our control, the less control we have.” –Epictetus ​ In times like these, it’s easy to let volatility and uncertainty get the best of us. It’s tempting to look for ways to make short-term gains in order to take the sting out of previous losses. But this kind of thinking pulls us away from our value investing fundamentals and distracts us with shiny objects. What kind of shiny objects? How about the top 5 largest stocks in the S&P 500. The top 5 – Apple, Microsoft, Amazon.com, Alphabet (Google), and Facebook – account for ​ ​ ​ approximately 23% of the index’s market value. That leaves 495 or so other companies in the index, many of which are worthy of investment based not on their index position but on other analyzable criteria. Let’s not forget that the S&P is weighted by float-adjusted market capitalization, which is why the top 5 stocks affect the index so profoundly and are watched and talked about like they are the only players in the game. We value investors shouldn’t fall for the trap of index funds. We know to avoid the pitfall of correlating the weighted index position of a stock with the quality of the business behind it. We know that largest does not always mean strongest or best value. In this letter, you can read about companies in our portfolio that are demonstrating their strength and intrinsic value.
    [Show full text]