DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of Event Data Recorders in Real World Crashes and Full-Scale Crash Tests" (2003)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of Event Data Recorders in Real World Crashes and Full-Scale Crash Tests Rowan University Rowan Digital Works Theses and Dissertations 11-30-2003 Evaluation of event data recorders in real world crashes and full- scale crash tests Lewis Thomas Clayton Jr. Rowan University Follow this and additional works at: https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd Part of the Mechanical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Clayton, Lewis Thomas Jr., "Evaluation of event data recorders in real world crashes and full-scale crash tests" (2003). Theses and Dissertations. 1273. https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/1273 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Rowan Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Rowan Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Evaluation of Event Data Recorders in Real World Crashes and Full-Scale Crash Tests Lewis Thomas Clayton Jr. A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE FACULTY OF ROWAN UNIVERSITY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE RECOMMENDED FOR ACCEPTANCE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING November 2003 Evaluation of Event Data Recorders in Real World Crashes and Full-Scale Crash Tests Prepared by: Lewis Thomas CytJr. Approved b Professor Hampton C. Gabler Rowan University Thesis Advisor Professor Jennifer A. Kadlowec Professoi . HrgZhang Rowan University Rohan Unikersity Thesis Reader Thesis Reader Professor John Chen Chai, Mechanical Engineering Rowan University ii © Copyright by Lewis Thomas Clayton Jr., 2003. All rights reserved. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank: * My family and friends for all their support throughout my schooling and career. * Dr. Hampton C. Gabler for affording me the opportunity to complete my thesis at Rowan University. * The National Academy of Science, Transportation Research Board, National Cooperative Highway Research Board, Project 17-24 for their sponsorship of the project that allowed me to complete this thesis. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS A C K N O W LED G EM EN T S........................................................................................... IV TA BLE O F C O N TEN TS ................................................................................................. V LIST O F FIGU R ES..................................................................................................... V III LIST O F TABLE S ............................................................................................................ X A BSTRA C T ....................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ........................................... 2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 2 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 3 SCOPE ............................................................................................................................. 4 A PPLICATIONS OF ED R s ................................................................................................... 4 CURRENT TECHNOLOGY ................................................................................................... 5 OriginalEquipment Manufacturer Technology (OEM)............................................. 6 Afterm arket Manufacturer Technology ....................................................................... 7 THESIS O RGANIZATION .................................................................................................... 8 CHAPTER 2 - EVALUATION OF EDRS IN CRASH TESTS ................................... 9 O BJECTIVE ........................................................................................................................ 9 DESCRIPTION OF N CA P TESTS ......................................................................................... 9 Test Configuration..................................................................................................... 10 Crash Test Dum m ies .................................................................................................. 11 Vehicle and BarrierInstrum entation ......................................................................... 14 NCAP TESTS: EDRs VS. NCAP LAB INSTRUMENTATION ............................................. 16 Comparison Methodology ..................................................................................... 17 Preparing the N CA P D ata ...................................................................................... 17 Preparing the G M SDM D ata ................................................................................ 18 Matching the GM SDM Data to the NCAP Data for Plotting ............................... 19 GM SDM vs. NCAP VELOCITY PROFILE COMPARISON ................................................ 20 NHTSA Test 3851 ..................................................................................................... 21 NH TSA Test 3952 ...................................................................................................... 23 N HTSA Test 4198 ...................................................................................................... 24 N HTSA Test 4244 ...................................................................................................... 26 NH TSA Test 4472 ...................................................................................................... 27 NH TSA Test 4487 ...................................................................................................... 29 NH TSA Test Comparison Sum m ary .......................................................................... 30 G M SD M vs. N CA P CRASH PARAM ETERS ................................................................... 31 GM SD M vs. N CAP Reported Seat Belt Usage ......................................................... 31 GM SDM vs. NCAP Reported Airbag Deployment Status ........................................ 32 GM SDM vs. N CAP Initial Velocity - Pre-CrashEvent ........................................... 32 V Presence of Non-Deploym ent Event .......................................................................... 33 SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 35 CHAPTER 3 - EVALUATION OF EDRS IN ACCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS....37 OBJECTIVE ...................................................................................................................... 37 COLLECTION OF CASE D ATA .......................................................................................... 38 NationalAutomotive Sampling System (NASS) ............................................... 38 Crashw orthiness D ata System (CD S) .................................................................... 39 General Estim ates System (GES) .......................................................................... 40 Special Crash Investigations (SCI)............................................................................ 40 Crash Injury Research & EngineeringNetwork (CIREN) ........................................ 41 DESCRIPTION OF THE ROWAN UNIVERSITY GM SDM DATABASE ................................. 42 DatabaseFormat ....................................................................................................... 43 Quality Issues ............................................................................................................ 44 DESCRIPTION OF THE GM SDM CASES .......................................................................... 45 Event Storage............................................................................................................. 45 Computing GM SDM Delta-V ................................................................................... 48 Characterizationof the GM SDM Dataset................................................................ 49 Availability of GM SDM Delta-V Data ................................................ 54 Delta-V Distribution.............. .................................. 5 7 W INSMASH VS. GM SDM DELTA-V .............................................................................. 61 Objective .................................................................................................................... 62 Availability.................................................................................................................62 Delta-V Comparison.................................................................................................. 63 DESCRIPTION OF THE ROWAN UNIVERSITY FORD RCM DATABASE ............................... 66 DatabaseForm at ....................................................................................................... 67 Quality Issues ............................................................................................................ 68 DESCRIPTION OF THE FORD RCM CASES ....................................................................... 68 Event Storage and Delta- V Records .......................................................................... 69 Storing Multiple Crash Events .................................................................................. 71 Computing FordRCM Delta-V ............................................................................... 73 Characterizationof the Ford RCM Dataset.............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Task Order 7 of the Commercial Motor Vehicle Technology Diagnostics and Performance Enhancement Program Foreword
    Task Order 7 of the Commercial Motor Vehicle Technology Diagnostics and Performance Enhancement Program Foreword This project is one of several performed under the provisions of Section 5117 of the Transportation Equity Act of the 21st Century (TEA-21). The primary objective of this project was to explore the potential for the development of cost-effective vehicle data recorder (VDR) solutions tailored to varied applications or market segments. Through a combination of technical research and analysis, including business-related cost-benefit assessment, potential VDR configurations ranging from fundamental to comprehensive were explored. The work performed under the project included: • Capturing the available results of this research and synthesizing information from the commercial vehicle user, original equipment manufacturer (OEM), equipment supplier, and recorder manufacturer communities. • Profiling high-level functional requirements of VDRs, which were extracted from industry and government findings (NHTSA, FHWA, TRB, ATA/TMC), as well as surveying and interviewing key industry stakeholders, and assessing end-user needs and expectations regarding VDR capabilities and required data parameters. • Developing several VDR concepts with different levels of VDR sophistication. VDR concepts were formulated and targeted for the following end-use applications: − Accident reconstruction and crash causation − Operational efficiency − Driver monitoring • Profiling and analyzing advanced VDR technologies that could be added to any of the concepts developed. • Identifying and estimating the costs and benefits for each of the VDR concepts developed. The results from this project can be used by motor carriers in helping evaluate vehicle data recorder applications, costs, and potential benefit scenarios. Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeffrey A. Suway, P.E. Accident Reconstruction and Human Factors Expert
    2292 Faraday Avenue, #100 Carlsbad California, 92008 [email protected] 619‐625‐6800 Curriculum Vitae Jeffrey A. Suway, P.E. Accident Reconstruction and Human Factors Expert OVERVIEW Mr. Suway is a licensed Professional Mechanical Engineer, an ACTAR accredited accident reconstructionist and human factors expert and has been working in these fields since 2008. Mr. Suway holds a Master of Science degree in Civil Engineering with a specialty in Transportation Safety from the George Washington University through the National Crash Analysis Center (NCAC), and he holds a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Bucknell University. He has testified as an expert in Accident Reconstruction and Human Factors, including complex visibility and conspicuity analyses. He has extensive experience conducting complex 3-dimensional accident reconstructions and simulations. He performs mechanical inspections for component failure and driveability issues in light-duty passenger vehicles, heavy trucks, buses, and other equipment. Mr. Suway is qualified to download and analyze all types of Event Data Recorders and is certified in the download and analysis of Bosch Crash Data Retrieval (CDR) data. Mr. Suway conducts and analyzes complex visibility and conspicuity issues and recreations. These recreations allow for analysis of when or if pedestrians, vehicles, or other objects are visible. Additionally, Mr. Suway creates forensically accurate photographs and videos for demonstrative evidence. Mr. Suway researches and analyzes human factors issues, such as perception-response times, typical human behavior, object detection, human perception, and product warnings and signage. He has extensive involvement in research and has numerous peer reviewed publications and presentations through the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), Transportation Research Board (TRB), Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (HFES), and Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV).
    [Show full text]
  • Inside the World of Event Data Recorders
    JCFR-July-August 2013.qxp 8/6/13 3:31 PM Page 11 A NEW DIRECTION IN AUTO CLAIMS Inside the World of developed them because it needed not only to make a Event Data Recorders safer automobile, but to defend itself in cases of "he said/she said" litigation. By Lou Stanley If a car hits a tree, the standard EDR data will The initial EDR technology reflect the exact speed of the car/tree impact, accelerated into the public Fraud fighters are constantly looking for the acceleration or deceleration for a number eye during the years of new approaches to old problems and old of seconds before and just after impact, if the phantom acceleration approaches to new problems. Within the foot was on the brake or still on the gas, and claims against Toyota and realm of automobile claims, a sister industry many other items of fact. Imagine a very pre- has progressed since has developed and implemented a tool that cise, multi-second, looping device that that time. may have a huge impact on the future of records and saves data at each and every trig- insurance claims handling. gering incident. It's just that simple. Now, with the technology exactly as it is, an EDR read- The Crash Data Retrieval (CDR Tool) is a Using this real world data, government can out will provide technical combination of hardware and software that develop more effective occupant protection vehicle and occupant infor- The inner workings of an Airbag Control Module reads the crash data found in a vehicles’ and motor vehicle safety programs and man- mation for a short amount of Event Data Recorder (EDR).
    [Show full text]
  • The Forensics Aspects of Event Data Recorders
    Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law Volume 3 Number 3 Article 2 2008 The Forensics Aspects of Event Data Recorders Jeremy S. Daily University of Tulsa Nathan Singleton University of Tulsa Elizabeth Downing Digital Forensics Professionals, Inc. Gavin W. Manes Digital Forensics Professionals, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/jdfsl Part of the Computer Engineering Commons, Computer Law Commons, Electrical and Computer Engineering Commons, Forensic Science and Technology Commons, and the Information Security Commons Recommended Citation Daily, Jeremy S.; Singleton, Nathan; Downing, Elizabeth; and Manes, Gavin W. (2008) "The Forensics Aspects of Event Data Recorders," Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law: Vol. 3 : No. 3 , Article 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15394/jdfsl.2008.1044 Available at: https://commons.erau.edu/jdfsl/vol3/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law by an authorized administrator of (c)ADFSL Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, Vol. 3(3) The Forensics Aspects of Event Data Recorders Jeremy S. Daily University of Tulsa 600 S. College Ave. Tulsa, OK 74104 918-631-3056 [email protected] Nathan Singleton University of Tulsa 600 S. College Ave. Tulsa, OK 74104 918-631-3056 [email protected] Elizabeth Downing Digital Forensics Professionals, Inc. 401 S. Boston Ave. Ste. 1701 Tulsa, OK 74103 918-856-5337 [email protected] Gavin W.
    [Show full text]
  • “Black Boxes” in Passenger Vehicles: Policy Issues
    “Black Boxes” in Passenger Vehicles: Policy Issues Bill Canis Specialist in Industrial Organization and Business David Randall Peterman Analyst in Transportation Policy July 21, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R43651 “Black Boxes” in Passenger Vehicles: Policy Issues Summary An event data recorder (EDR) is an electronic sensor installed in a motor vehicle that records certain technical information about a vehicle’s operational performance for a few seconds immediately prior to and during a crash. Although over 90% of all new cars and light trucks sold in the United States are equipped with them, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is proposing that all new light vehicles have EDRs installed in the future. Under previously adopted NHTSA rules, these devices have to capture at least 15 types of information related to the vehicle’s performance in the few seconds just before and immediately after a crash serious enough to result in deployment of airbags. EDRs have the potential to make a significant contribution to highway safety. For example, EDR data showed that in several cases a Chevrolet Cobalt’s ignition switch turned the engine off while the car was still moving, causing the car to lose power steering and crash; the data directly contributed to the manufacturer’s decision to recall 2.6 million vehicles. EDR data could also be used, sometimes in conjunction with other vehicle technologies, to record in the few seconds before an accident such data as driver steering input, seat occupant size and position, and sound within a car. The privacy of information collected by EDRs is a matter of state law, except that federal law bars NHTSA from disclosing personally identifiable information.
    [Show full text]
  • Recording Automotive Crash Event Data
    Recording Automotive Crash Event Data Augustus "Chip" Chidester, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration John Hinch, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Thomas C. Mercer, General Motors Corporation Keith S. Schultz, General Motors Corporation Keywords: Highway/Automotive/Event/Recorder Introduction The National Transportation Safety Board has recommended that automobile manufacturers and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration work cooperatively to gather information on automotive crashes using on-board collision sensing and recording devices. Since 1974, General Motors' (GM) airbag equipped production vehicles have recorded airbag status and crash severity data for impacts that caused a deployment. Many of these systems also recorded data during “near-deployment” events, i.e., impacts that are not severe enough to deploy the airbag(s). GM design engineers have used this information to improve the performance of airbag sensing systems and NHTSA researchers have used it to help understand the field performance of alternative airbag system designs. Beginning with the 1999 model year, the capability to record pre-crash vehicle speed, engine RPM, throttle position, and brake switch on/off status has been added to some GM vehicles. This paper discusses the evolution and contents of the current GM event data recording capability, how other researchers working to develop a safer highway transportation system might acquire and utilize the information, and the status of the NHTSA Motor Vehicle Safety Research Advisory Committee’s Event Data Recorder Working Group effort to develop a uniform approach to recording such data. Evolution of GM Event Data Recording GM introduced the first regular production driver/passenger airbag systems as an option in selected 1974 production vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Event Data Recorder (EDR) Working Group
    Memorandum U.S. Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 'L-k,v,'3 3 SubJect Submittal of the Final Report of the NHTSA R&D Event Date 8/30/200 1 Data Recorder (EDR) Working Group to Docket TSA-99-5218 - dl Fr#rg&in&,-PheAssociate Administrator for Research and Development TO: The Docket THRU: John Womack Acting Chief Counsel Attached is the Final Report of the NHTSA Research and Development Event Data Recorder (EDR) Working Group. This report was circulated within NHTSA and has received concurrence for publication. Research and Development requests that this report be placed in the public docket. Attachment SAFETY BELTS SAVE LIVES AUTO SAFETY HOTLINE (800) 424-9393 EVENT DATA RECORDERS SUMMARY OF FINDINGS by the NHTSA EDR Working Group August 2001 Final Report This publication is distributed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, in the interests of information exchange. The opinions and findings expressed in this publication are those of the working group members and not necessarily those of the Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The United States Government assumes no liability for its content or use thereof. Trade and manufacturers’ name and products are mentioned because they are considered essential to the object of the publication and should not be construed as an endorsement. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. 11 Table of Contents ... Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Mississippi Bar Litigation Section E-Newsletter
    The Mississippi Bar Litigation Section E-Newsletter Fall 2015 SPECIAL 1 POINTS OF Message from the Chair – Meade Mitchell INTEREST: Dear Members of the Litigation Section of the Mississippi Bar, Depo Academy Nov. 12-13 I am honored to serve as the Section Chair for 2015-2016 and help continue our Section’s service to the state’s litigators. The Litigation Section, the largest in the Bar, is involved in a wide range of activities of MVLP Donation interest to the civil litigator, the general practitioner and the bench. Through newsletters, email services, and CLE seminars, the Section analyzes, discusses, and provides methods and services designed to The Future of promote justice in our courts. Along with the Mississippi College School Cars and Trucks of Law and the Mississippi Law Institute, the Section also periodically (Plus the Litiga- publishes the Mississippi Rules Annotated. tion to Follow) Under the leadership of Past Chair Rebecca Wiggs, we had a strong 2014-2015 year. The Section continued its support of state law students by awarding four law school scholarships at Scholarships Ole Miss and Mississippi College. Additionally, the Section provided a donation of $5000 to Awarded the Mississippi Volunteer Lawyers Project (MVLP), which has helped the needy of our state obtain legal services since 1982. The Section also hosted a CLE program at the Bar Lessons Learned Convention, which featured a discussion of the Bar’s new Professionalism Deposition from Pro Se Guidelines and an entertaining presentation by Will Manuel on dealing with generational Litigants differences within law firms. We also co-sponsored the Capital Area Bar Association’s diversity program and worked with Mississippi College to support its public program on grand juries.
    [Show full text]
  • A Compendium of Passenger Vehicle Event Data Recorder Literature and Analysis of Validation Studies," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-1497, 2016, Doi:10.4271/2016-01-1497
    Downloaded from SAE International by William Bortles, Thursday, April 14, 2016 A Compendium of Passenger Vehicle Event Data Recorder 2016-01-1497 Literature and Analysis of Validation Studies Published 04/05/2016 William Bortles, Wayne Biever, Neal Carter, and Connor Smith Kineticorp LLC CITATION: Bortles, W., Biever, W., Carter, N., and Smith, C., "A Compendium of Passenger Vehicle Event Data Recorder Literature and Analysis of Validation Studies," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-1497, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-1497. Copyright © 2016 SAE International Abstract began to report Pre-Crash data. In 2003, the CDR system announced support of select Ford vehicles for 2001 model year and newer This paper presents a comprehensive literature review of original vehicles. In August of 2006, the National Highway Traffic Safety equipment event data recorders (EDR) installed in passenger Administration (NHTSA) issued rule 49 of the Code of Federal vehicles, as well as a summary of results from the instrumented Regulations (CFR) Part 563, pertaining to the standardization of data validation studies. The authors compiled 187 peer-reviewed studies, and data retrieval methods for vehicles with a gross vehicle weight textbooks, legal opinions, governmental rulemaking policies, industry rating (GVWR) of 8,500 pounds or less that were already voluntarily publications and presentations pertaining to event data recorders. Of recording time-series event data [2]. This prompted additional the 187 total references, there were 64 that contained testing data. automobile manufacturers to partner with the CDR system. The authors conducted a validation analysis using data from 27 papers that presented both the EDR and corresponding independent Beginning in 2007, a new release of the CDR system supported select instrumentation values for: 2005 model year and newer Chrysler vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Summary Crash Data Records
    Vehicle: 2015 Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class CLAIMS REPORT VIN: WDDLJ7GB7FA****** EXPOSURE, RISK & DECISION SUPPORT Report ID: #4 Generated: 2019-02-07 22:41:51 REPORT SUMMARY This section provides an overview of the predictive analytics used for the estimation of claim severity, exposure, and fraud risk for the most recent crash or event sequence. The market value range for the vehicle is CAD Repair / Loss Exposure $77,212.86 - 95,384.26. The vehicle is predicted to be repairable. 1st Party: Risk of Short-term Whiplash (75%). Risk of Long-term Whiplash (26%) Occupant Injury Risk 3rd Party (if any; for average car size): Risk of Short- term Whiplash (35%) Within the 5.0 seconds of recorded pre-impact data for the most recent crash, the recorded speed range on this Pre-Crash Vehicle Speed vehicle was 4 km/h to 84 km/h. The vehicle speed was 17 km/h at the moment of impact. Flags / Loss Indicators Low-Medium Risk (1 Alert): Panic Stop Expedite Settlement / Treatment. Compare pre-crash Recommended Action / Notes data to reported circumstances. CRASH DATA RECORDS This section lists crash data records stored on the vehicle's event data recorder. The date of crash data collection was 2019-02-07. Type / Sudden Force of Engine Recency / Crash Direction of Damage Speed Impact (g- Starts Since Sequence Severity Force Area Change Force) Event Moderate Rear-end 22.00 km/h 165 degrees Most Recent 8.49 g 18 Severity Collision (Increasing) (5 o'Clock) How To Interpret This Information The crash severity (acceleration / g-force) measured by the airbag module accelerometer reached a maximum value of 22.00 km/h within 100 milliseconds, which is considered "moderately severe" in terms of severity.
    [Show full text]
  • Utilizing Data from Automotive Event Data Recorders
    UTILIZING DATA FROM AUTOMOTIVE des coussins gonflable et un besoin de mesurer et de EVENT DATA RECORDERS détecter la sévérité d’un impact par les manufacturiers automobiles. GM utilise un module de détection et de Joe T. Correia diagnostic « Sensing and Diagnostic Module (SDM) » Ken A. Iliadis pour mesurer la sévérité d’une collision depuis 1994 Ed S. McCarron et enregistre des données d’avant collision tel que, Mario A. Smolej vitesse du véhicule, révolution moteur, position de l’accélérateur et statu du frein sur certains modèles Hastings, Boulding, Correia 1999. Cet article revise l’évolution des dispositifs Consulting Engineers d’enregistrement automatique dans le transport, en autre le « Event Data Recorder (EDR) ». L’enregistrement et l’acquisition de données dans le Abstract système GM et Vetronix sont examinés avec une attention particulière sur les données utilisable pour In March 2000, Vetronix Corporation unveiled a fin de reconstruction d’accident. Douze essais à Crash Data Retrieval (CDR) system that allows users faible vitesse ont été effectués afin d’enquêter sur le to download data from certain GM vehicles subjected seuil et la sensibilité de l’enregistrement et cinq to a crash event involving the deployment or near études examinent l’utilité et les limites des données deployment of an airbag. The recording of crash enregistrées. event data is a by-product of the introduction of airbags and the need to measure or sense the severity of a crash by automobile manufacturers. GM has Evolution of Data Recorders been using a Sensing and Diagnostic Module (SDM) to measure crash severity since 1994 and started Event Data Recorders (EDRs), or automatic recording recording pre-crash data, such as vehicle speed, devices that can capture information regarding an engine RPM, throttle position, and brake status with event, have existed in the transportation industry for some 1999 model year vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Scaling Measures and Improvement of Data Collection
    Quality Criteria for the Safety Assessment of Cars Based on Real-World Crashes Scaling Measures and Improvement of Data Collection Report of Sub-Task 1.3/4.3 CEA/EC SARAC II QUALITY CRITERIA FOR THE SAFETY ASSESSME OF CARS BASED ON REAL-WORLD CRASHES Funded by the European Commission, Directorate General TREN SARAC II Quality Criteria for the Safety Assessment of Cars based on Real-World Crashes Project Number: SUB/B 27020B-E3.S0717321-2002 REPORT of Sub-task 1.3 Scaling Measures and Improvement of Data Collection Brian Fildes, Liam Fechner, and Astrid Linder Monash University Accident Research Centre Melbourne, Australia November 2005 CEA/EC SARAC II QUALITY CRITERIA FOR THE SAFETY ASSESSME OF CARS BASED ON REAL-WORLD CRASHES Funded by the European Commission, Directorate General TREN International Project Management Comité Européen des Assurances (CEA) Prof. Dr. Klaus Langwieder SARAC Members European Commission (EC) Comité Européen des Assurances (CEA) DG TREN 26 Boulevard Haussmann 28 Rue Demot FR-75009 Paris B-1040 Brussels Monash University Helsinki University of Technology Accident Research Centre (MUARC) Laboratory of Transportation Engineering Building 70, P.O. Box 2100 Clayton, 3800 Victoria, Australia FIN-02015 HUT, Finland BMW Group Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen Centro Zaragoza Vehicle Safety (BASt) Instituto de Investigación Sobre D-80788 München Brüderstraße 53 Reparación de Vehiculos, S.A. D-51427 Bergisch Gladbach Carretera Nacional 232, km 273 E-50690 Pedrola (Zaragoza) DaimlerChrysler AG Department for Transport FIA Foundation for the Automobile Zone 1/29a Great Minister House and Society D-71059 Sindelfingen 76 Marsham Street 8 Place de la Concorde London, SW1P 4DR United Kingdom Paris 75008 France Ministry of Transport and Finnish Motor Insurers’ Centre FOLKSAM Insurance Group Communications of Finland (VALT) Research/Traffic Safety P.O.
    [Show full text]