DOCSLIB.ORG

Consultation on the Railways and Other Guided Transport Systems (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Consultation on the Railways and Other Guided Transport Systems (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations July 2012 Contents Foreword 4 Executive summary 5 1. Introduction 7 Implementation of the revised Railway Safety Directive 7 The first stage of implementation 7 The second stage of implementation 7 The consultation 8 2. Background to the revised Railway Safety Directive 9 European Common Transport Policy 9 Purpose of the revised Railway Safety Directive 9 Desired outcome of implementing the revised Railway Safety Directive 10 Scope of the revised Railway Safety Directive 10 Overview of proposals for the United Kingdom 10 3. Certification of entities in charge of maintenance of freight wagons 12 ECM certificate 12 ECM Accreditation Scheme 12 Certification body 13 Assessment of applications for ECM certificates 14 4. Proposals for Regulations giving effect to the ECM Regulation 15 Introduction 15 Citation, commencement and interpretation 15 Amendments to the Health and Safety (Enforcing Authority for Railways and Other Guided Transport Systems) Regulations 2006 15 Amendments to the Railways and Other Guided Transport Systems (Safety) Regulations 2006 (“ROGS”) 16 Amendments to the Train Driving Licences and Certificates Regulations 2010 25 Statutory review of EARR and TDLCR 25 5. Impact assessment 26 6. Summary of questions 27 7. How to respond 28 The consultation 28 Office of Rail Regulation | October 2012 | Consultation on the Miscellaneous Amendments Regulations 2 1475740 Responses 28 Next steps 28 8. List of those consulted 29 9. Glossary of terms 39 Annex A: ECM Regulation 445/2011 Annex B: Draft Regulations Annex C: ROGS consolidated with proposed amendments Annex D: European Directive 2008/110/EC Annex E: List of exclusions from the mainline railway Annex F: Application for removal from scope Annex G: Impact assessment Annex H: Government Code of Practice Office of Rail Regulation | October 2012 | Consultation on the Miscellaneous Amendments Regulations 3 1475740 Foreword The Office of Rail Regulation (“ORR”) has a duty to the Secretary of State under paragraph 2(5) of Schedule 3 of the Railways Act 2005 to submit from time to time such proposals, as ORR considers appropriate, for the making of Regulations for railway safety purposes. The Secretary of State has agreed a protocol between the Department for Transport and ORR with a view to ORR preparing draft Regulations for these purposes, which are then submitted to the Secretary of State for approval and making. This consultation proposes draft Regulations that give effect in Great Britain to Commission Regulation 445/2011 in Great Britain. The Commission Regulation sets out a system of certification of entities in charge of maintenance of freight wagons. As well as giving effect to the Commission Regulation, ORR has taken the opportunity to propose some better regulation amendments to the existing safety regime and clarify some of the definitions used in the Railways and Other Guided Transport Systems (Safety) Regulations 2006. The proposed draft Regulations aim to bring the certification regime for entities in charge of maintenance within the scope of ORR’s existing enforcement remit, remove some regulatory overlap and reduce administrative burdens on some duty holders. I hope that all interested parties will contribute their views on these proposals over the coming months. We look forward to hearing from you. Ian Prosser, Director of Railway Safety 30 July 2012 Office of Rail Regulation | October 2012 | Consultation on the Miscellaneous Amendments Regulations 4 1475740 Executive summary Certification of entities in charge of maintenance of freight wagons This consultation document sets out proposals for introducing the certification regime for entities in charge of maintenance (“ECMs”) of freight wagons required under European Directive 2008/110/EC (“the revised Railway Safety Directive”) in Great Britain. The revised Railway Safety Directive, which amends the Railway Safety Directive (2004/49/EC), requires that an ECM for freight wagons obtains a certificate from a certification body to show that it has a satisfactory system of maintenance. The Office of Rail Regulation (“ORR”) will initially be a certification body for ECMs. An ECM certificate will provide assurance to railway undertakings that an ECM is able to safely maintain the freight wagons for which it has responsibility. The European Commission adopted Regulation 445/2011 on a system of certification of ECMs for freight wagons (“the ECM Regulation”) on 10 May 2011 (Annex A) and ORR has developed draft regulations (Annex B) to give effect to the ECM Regulation in Great Britain and bring the enforcement of it in line with ORR’s existing enforcement remit. The draft Regulations include amendments to the Railways and Other Guided Transport Systems (Safety) Regulations 2006 (“ROGS”) (S.I. 2006/599) to require ECMs for freight wagons to obtain an ECM certificate from a certification body. They also provide an appeal mechanism if applicants for ECM certificates are unhappy about the decision of a certification body. ORR has also taken the opportunity to consider the current legislative framework in light of lessons learned from operating under the current regime and other changes in European provisions. Accordingly, the draft regulations also contain the following additional amendments: Changes to the Health and Safety (Enforcing Authority for Railways and Other Guided Transport Systems) Regulations 2006 (“EARR”) (S.I. 2006/557 as amended by S.I. 2008/2323) Extending the powers of ORR inspectors to give them jurisdiction to enter, and undertake enforcement in certain premises that are currently excluded from their remit (such as warehouses and factories). This amendment ensures that ORR inspectors have the necessary powers to inspect and enforce, on railway operational matters only, in premises where an ECM may have maintenance facilities. Changes to ROGS Removing the current requirement for mainline operators to carry out safety verification in light of the introduction of the common safety method (“CSM”) on risk evaluation and assessment (Commission Regulation 352/2009). This will avoid duplication by removing the need for mainline duty holders to carry out the existing safety verification requirements in ROGS as well as applying the CSM on risk evaluation and assessment. Office of Rail Regulation | October 2012 | Consultation on the Miscellaneous Amendments Regulations 5 1475740 Amending the definition of “mainline railway” in ROGS to clarify what systems are within scope and ensure that operators of heritage and light rail systems can be excluded from the requirements applicable to mainline operators where appropriate. ORR proposes to maintain an Approved List of exclusions (Annex E), which will be published on ORR’s website. Other proposed changes to ROGS include: • removing the requirement for non-mainline operators to send annual safety reports to ORR thereby reducing their administrative burden; • clarifying that controllers of ‘safety-critical work’ must have suitable and sufficient monitoring arrangements in place; • ensuring that the 28-day ‘affected parties’ consultation period runs concurrently with ORR’s four month processing time for applications for safety certificates and safety authorisations, thereby reducing the time taken for applicants to receive a safety certificate or safety authorisation; and • amending the definitions of “national safety rules” and “placed in service” to clarify their meaning. Changes to the Train Driving Licences and Certificates Regulations 2010 The draft Regulations also contain proposals to amend the Train Driving Licences and Certificates Regulations 2010 (“TDLCR”) (S.I. 2010/724) to clarify the meaning of “in code form” in relation to medical restrictions in train driving licences and reflect the changes made to the definition of “mainline railway” in ROGS. Office of Rail Regulation | October 2012 | Consultation on the Miscellaneous Amendments Regulations 6 1475740 1. Introduction Implementation of the revised Railway Safety Directive 1.1 This consultation document sets out proposals for introducing the certification regime for entities in charge of maintenance (“ECM”) of freight wagons required under European Directive 2008/110/EC (“the revised Railway Safety Directive”) in Great Britain. The revised Railway Safety Directive, which amends the Railway Safety Directive (2004/49/EC), requires that an ECM for freight wagons obtains a certificate from a certification body to show that it has a satisfactory system of maintenance. 1.2 The revised Railway Safety Directive aims to improve market opening and to develop and improve safety on the European Union’s railways. It requires that an ECM is assigned to a vehicle and registered in the National Vehicle Register (“NVR”) before the vehicle is placed in service or used on the network. These provisions are already in place but it is necessary to make further amendments to recognise the provisions of European Regulation 445/2011 (“the ECM Regulation”) (Annex A), which sets out a certification system for ECMs for freight wagons. 1.3 Since the ECM Regulation was only published in May 2011, it has been necessary for the UK to have a two-stage implementation plan to transpose the requirements of the revised Railway Safety Directive and give effect to the ECM Regulation. The approach, which is explained in more detail below, is in accordance with UK law-making practice and prevents subsidiarity issues by not sub-delegating
Recommended publications
  • Managing Online Communications and Feedback Relating to the Welsh Visitor Attraction Experience: Apathy and Inflexibility in Tourism Marketing Practice?

    Managing Online Communications and Feedback Relating to the Welsh Visitor Attraction Experience: Apathy and Inflexibility in Tourism Marketing Practice?

    Managing online communications and feedback relating to the Welsh visitor attraction experience: apathy and inflexibility in tourism marketing practice? David Huw Thomas, BA, PGCE, PGDIP, MPhil Supervised by: Prof Jill Venus, Dr Conny Matera-Rogers and Dr Nicola Palmer Submitted in partial fulfilment for the award of the degree of PhD University of Wales Trinity Saint David. 2018 i ii DECLARATION This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree. Signed (candidate) Date 15.02.2018 STATEMENT 1 This thesis is the result of my own investigations, except where otherwise stated. Where correction services have been used, the extent and nature of the correction is clearly marked in a footnote(s). Other sources are acknowledged by footnotes giving explicit references. A bibliography is appended. Signed (candidate) Date 15.02.2018 STATEMENT 2 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter- library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed (candidate) Date 15.02.2018 STATEMENT 3 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for deposit in the University’s digital repository. Signed (candidate) Date 15.02.2018 iii iv Abstract Understanding of what constitutes a tourism experience has been the focus of increasing attention in academic literature in recent years. For tourism businesses operating in an ever more competitive marketplace, identifying and responding to the needs and wants of their customers, and understanding how the product or consumer experience is created is arguably essential.
  • Bluebell Railway Education Department Along the Line

    Bluebell Railway Education Department Along the Line

    BLUEBELL RAILWAY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT ALONG THE LINE FOR SCHOOLS SHEFFIELD PARK STATION 1. Approaching the station buildings along the drive, the picnic area can be seen to the right, adjacent to the River Ouse, where lunch can be taken. The river is little more than a stream today but it was once navigable from the sea at Newhaven to just short of Balcombe Viaduct – on the London to Brighton main line between Haywards Heath and Balcombe. The 11 million bricks used to construct the viaduct were transported up river from Lewes by barge. 2. The station is built in the Queen Anne country architectural style, a style used at all stations on the line and is painted in the colours of the line's initial operators, the London Brighton and South Coast Railway. The year in which the line opened – 1892 -can be found in the decorative plasterwork on the front of the station building. Passengers enter the station via the booking hall and purchase their old fashioned Edmondson cardboard tickets from the booking office. The station was originally lit by oil lamps but is now lit by a mix of evocative gas lighting and more modern electric lights. It sits astride the Greenwich Meridian, the exact (Photo: Bluebell Archives) location being marked by a plaque at the north end of platform 1. 3. The Railway houses and maintains its fleet of mainly steam locomotives at the station - currently it has some thirty engines in stock although only ten or so are in service at any given time – they need a boiler inspection and a new certificate every ten years.
  • Derwent Valley Line

    Derwent Valley Line

    Prices correct at November 2018 November at correct Prices (Newark) – Nottingham – Derby – Matlock – Derby – Nottingham – (Newark) derbyshire.gov.uk/bline long as one end of your journey is in Derbyshire. in is journey your of end one as long © Matt Jones Matt © . Receive 25% off local train fares as as fares train local off 25% Receive 01629 533190 01629 Derbyshire Call Derbyshire b_line Card Holders Holders Card b_line Derbyshire This publication is available in other formats from from formats other in available is publication This most local bus services (Wayfarer cannot be purchased on the train). the on purchased be cannot (Wayfarer services bus local most eastmidlandstrains.co.uk/derwentvalleyline and other staffed stations, from Tourist Information Centres and on on and Centres Information Tourist from stations, staffed other and 01629 538062 538062 01629 for seniors or child. Tickets can be purchased at Derby, Long Eaton Eaton Long Derby, at purchased be can Tickets child. or seniors for Hall Matlock DE4 3AG. 3AG. DE4 Matlock Hall except on Sundays. Adult tickets £13.00 including one child, £6.50 £6.50 child, one including £13.00 tickets Adult Sundays. on except Council, Economy, Transport and Communities Department, County County Department, Communities and Transport Economy, Council, travel before 0900 Monday to Saturday or on the Transpeak bus bus Transpeak the on or Saturday to Monday 0900 before travel Derwent Valley Line Community Rail Partnership, Derbyshire County County Derbyshire Partnership, Rail Community Line Valley Derwent train services in Derbyshire and the Peak District. Not valid for rail rail for valid Not District. Peak the and Derbyshire in services train day rover tickets are valid on most bus and and bus most on valid are tickets rover day Derbyshire Wayfarer Derbyshire tourism and railway organisations.
  • Rails by the Sea.Pdf

    Rails by the Sea.Pdf

    1 RAILS BY THE SEA 2 RAILS BY THE SEA In what ways was the development of the seaside miniature railway influenced by the seaside spectacle and individual endeavour from 1900 until the present day? Dr. Marcus George Rooks, BDS (U. Wales). Primary FDSRCS(Eng) MA By Research and Independent Study. University of York Department of History September 2012 3 Abstract Little academic research has been undertaken concerning Seaside Miniature Railways as they fall outside more traditional subjects such as standard gauge and narrow gauge railway history and development. This dissertation is the first academic study on the subject and draws together aspects of miniature railways, fairground and leisure culture. It examines their history from their inception within the newly developing fairground culture of the United States towards the end of the 19th. century and their subsequent establishment and development within the UK. The development of the seaside and fairground spectacular were the catalysts for the establishment of the SMR in the UK. Their development was largely due to two individuals, W. Bassett-Lowke and Henry Greenly who realized their potential and the need to ally them with a suitable site such as the seaside resort. Without their input there is no doubt that SMRs would not have developed as they did. When they withdrew from the culture subsequent development was firmly in the hands of a number of individual entrepreneurs. Although embedded in the fairground culture they were not totally reliant on it which allowed them to flourish within the seaside resort even though the traditional fairground was in decline.
  • Railways List

    Railways List

    A guide and list to a collection of Historic Railway Documents www.railarchive.org.uk to e mail click here December 2017 1 Since July 1971, this private collection of printed railway documents from pre grouping and pre nationalisation railway companies based in the UK; has sought to expand it‟s collection with the aim of obtaining a printed sample from each independent railway company which operated (or obtained it‟s act of parliament and started construction). There were over 1,500 such companies and to date the Rail Archive has sourced samples from over 800 of these companies. Early in 2001 the collection needed to be assessed for insurance purposes to identify a suitable premium. The premium cost was significant enough to warrant a more secure and sustainable future for the collection. In 2002 The Rail Archive was set up with the following objectives: secure an on-going future for the collection in a public institution reduce the insurance premium continue to add to the collection add a private collection of railway photographs from 1970‟s onwards provide a public access facility promote the collection ensure that the collection remains together in perpetuity where practical ensure that sufficient finances were in place to achieve to above objectives The archive is now retained by The Bodleian Library in Oxford to deliver the above objectives. This guide which gives details of paperwork in the collection and a list of railway companies from which material is wanted. The aim is to collect an item of printed paperwork from each UK railway company ever opened.
  • List of Periodicals

    List of Periodicals

    Railway Studies Collection : list of periodicals The following is a list of periodicals and newsletters currently held in the Railway Studies Collection in Newton Abbot Library. A Archive * No 1, 1994 to date Association of Railway Preservation Societies Newsletters/Journals Nos 1-40,56-121, 123-155, 160-208, 212-225 Atlantic Coast Express* (see also Bideford & Instow Railway Group No 13, 21, 22, 40, 42-63, 65, 81 & 83 to date B Back Track * No 1, 1987 to date Barrowmore Model Railway Journal No 1 to date Beyer Peacock Quarterly Review 1927-32 Bideford & Instow Railway Group (continued as Atlantic Coast (to No. 21) Express) Big Four (Worcester Locomotive Society) Nos 35/38 Bishop’s Castle Railway Society Journal Nos 6-10, Black Eight (Stanier 8F Locomotive Society) Nos 3, 43-66, 68, 71,73,74,86, 90-92,95 Blastpipe (Scottish RPS) 1975 to 1980 – 2007 Bluebell News (Kent and East Sussex Railway) Summer 1979, 1980/81 & 1990 to date Bodmin and Wenford News (B & WRPS) No 13, 1990 to date Nos 103-201 & 203-205, 209 – 264 & 1972- Branch Line News 1975 to date Branch Line Review Mar, Jul 1964, Jan, Apr 1965 Autumn ’94, Jul, Oct ’94, Mar, Oct ’96. Mar, Bridgend Valleys Railway Society Newsletter Nov ‘97 The Brighton Circular (L.B.S.C.R.) 1975 to date British Railway Journal * No 1 1983 to date Apr 1993, May 1994, Dec 1995, Jun 1999, Jul British Railway Modelling 2001, Apr 2002, Oct 2005. British Railways Historical Study Group No 1 1977 to 1980 British Railways Illustrated * No 1 1991 to date British Railways Magazine Eastern Region – CD 1948 - 1963 British Railways Magazine Southern Region Feb - Jun 1963 British Railways Southern Region Magazine 1949, vol 2 no 12 1951, vol 5 no 7 1954 British Steam Railways Nos 7,9,10 2004, No 17 2005 1948-49, Nos 1,5 1953, 1957-58, 1959-60 vol.6 no.3 1955, vol.8 nos 1-12 1957, vol11 no B.
  • Lancashire and Cumbria Route Utilisation Strategy August 2008

    Lancashire and Cumbria Route Utilisation Strategy August 2008

    Lancashire and Cumbria Route Utilisation Strategy August 2008 Foreword I am delighted to present Network Rail’s Route There are currently aspirations for a service Utilisation Strategy (RUS) for Lancashire and between Southport, Preston and Ormskirk. Cumbria, which considers issues affecting This is partly facilitated by work to enhance the railway in this part of the country over the track and signalling between Preston and next decade and gives a view on longer-term Ormskirk, which will allow a standard hourly issues in the years beyond. service pattern with improved journey times but without the need for more rolling stock. Getting to this stage has involved following a now well-established process. However, there Services into Sellafield during peak hours are two key differences with this strategy. suffer from overcrowding, though Northern The first is that no part of the area it covers Rail’s anticipated service from December is the responsibility of either a Passenger 2008 will address that to a degree. It is Transport Executive or a regional body with important services on this route firstly cater public transport responsibilities. Secondly, for peak traffic at Sellafield and Barrow, with the challenge usually faced when producing services outside the peak being on as close a RUS, that of insufficient capacity to meet to an hourly pattern as possible. current or future demand, is not a major A number of consultation responses were problem here. As a result, this strategy received regarding a direct service between focuses on how to make the best use of Manchester and Burnley, including a report what is already available.
  • Visitor Attraction Trends England 2003 Presents the Findings of the Survey of Visits to Visitor Attractions Undertaken in England by Visitbritain

    Visitor Attraction Trends England 2003 Presents the Findings of the Survey of Visits to Visitor Attractions Undertaken in England by Visitbritain

    Visitor Attraction Trends England 2003 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VisitBritain would like to thank all representatives and operators in the attraction sector who provided information for the national survey on which this report is based. No part of this publication may be reproduced for commercial purp oses without previous written consent of VisitBritain. Extracts may be quoted if the source is acknowledged. Statistics in this report are given in good faith on the basis of information provided by proprietors of attractions. VisitBritain regrets it can not guarantee the accuracy of the information contained in this report nor accept responsibility for error or misrepresentation. Published by VisitBritain (incorporated under the 1969 Development of Tourism Act as the British Tourist Authority) © 2004 Bri tish Tourist Authority (trading as VisitBritain) Cover images © www.britainonview.com From left to right: Alnwick Castle, Legoland Windsor, Kent and East Sussex Railway, Royal Academy of Arts, Penshurst Place VisitBritain is grateful to English Heritage and the MLA for their financial support for the 2003 survey. ISBN 0 7095 8022 3 September 2004 VISITOR ATTR ACTION TRENDS ENGLAND 2003 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS A KEY FINDINGS 4 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 12 1.1 Research objectives 12 1.2 Survey method 13 1.3 Population, sample and response rate 13 1.4 Guide to the tables 15 2 ENGLAND VISIT TRENDS 2002 -2003 17 2.1 England visit trends 2002 -2003 by attraction category 17 2.2 England visit trends 2002 -2003 by admission type 18 2.3 England visit trends
  • Takabout Steam Trains

    Takabout Steam Trains

    TALKABOUT STEAM TRAINS Full steam ahead Long before railway innovation and effi ciency moved from Britain to Japan, France and China, speed records were set in the British countryside by trains with names such as Flying Scotsman. From the Midlands to Devon, steam train enthusiasts are trying to bring back those days of locomotive engineering grandeur. WORDS CHRIS WRIGHT Steam locomotive 38021, Llangollen Railway, Wales PHOTOGRAPHY: DAVID WILCOCK DAVID PHOTOGRAPHY: JUNE 2015 QANTAS 127 Launceston Steam Railway Severn Valley Railway on the River Severn Carrog Station, Llangollen Railway ON MODEST SECTIONS of reconditioned track in the British countryside, original stream engines and carriages chug between stations rebuilt with painstaking accuracy to refl ect the way they looked in the golden era of steam trains, the fi rst four decades of the 20th century. Most are staffed by volunteers, from engine drivers to ticket collectors to those who maintain stations and tracks. and whose staff are handing out minced pies and mulled wine. This devotion only adds to the appeal. And, mostly, any revenue is Llangollen is a town on the River Dee, a stone bridge built in 1345 ploughed back into preservation. spanning its torrents. The water is livid and foaming as it vaults a weir. Steam trains attract all ages, but there’s a certain dynamic seen A famous pub restaurant, the Corn Mill, is on the bank of the river time and again: those who can remember, keen to convey to their opposite the station, with a waterwheel spinning and some of the descendants the wonders of the steam age.
  • Heritage & Community Railways Unite to Encourage Day Trippers to Make A

    Heritage & Community Railways Unite to Encourage Day Trippers to Make A

    Heritage & Community Railways unite to encourage day trippers to make a day of it – on the trains! August 27, 2021 The Heritage Railway Association (HRA) is backing Community Rail Network’s ‘Days Out by Rail’ campaign to encourage more day trippers to leave the car at home and take the train, well two trains in fact, for an educational and fun filled day out at one of the many Heritage Railways accessible from the main line. The idea, to use community railways to travel to one of the 32 heritage railway lines connected to the national network or have an interchange with it*, is part of a wider national awareness campaign to highlight green, scenic leisure travel by rail. The eight-week initiative being led by Community Rail Network’s tourism arm, Scenic Rail Britain, is raising awareness about rail as one of the greenest ways to travel – especially combined with walking, cycling and buses – avoiding traffic jams and parking and making the journey part of the experience. HRA CEO, Steve Oates said: “Days Out by Rail may sound familiar for those of us of a certain age who remember as a child setting off for a day out on the train with the family Rover Ticket or Away Day special on the Intercity 125. Updating the idea of Days Out by Rail not only encourages travel but, this time, sustainable travel. What better way to enjoy the UK rail network through the ages in one day, travelling from a local station on the national network to link up with a heritage line? “It is definitely much more relaxing that being behind the wheel in a traffic jam on your way to a tourist attraction.
  • Ferrymead Tram Tracts

    Ferrymead Tram Tracts

    Ferrymead Tram Tracts The Journal of the Tramway Historical Society Issue 45 – April 2020 Coronavirus Special Issue Members at work and at play during Lockdown Overseas Focus – United Kingdom Miscellany Where to for the Heritage Tramways Trust? (Re)Discovering a Sydney Bogie The Tramway Historical Society P. O. Box 1126, Christchurch 81401 - www.ferrymeadtramway.org.nz Ferrymead Tram Tracts April 2020 President’s Piece – Stephen Taylor And speaking of the Japan trip – it was interesting to Well, what a different a visit a country where public passenger rail month makes. Last month, transportation appeared to be done “properly”. We as reported in the March travelled on a few trains including the Tokyo – Ferrymead Tram Tracts, Hokkaido Shinkansen (bullet train) – all 17 carriages things were moving ahead of it. This took us from nice spring weather in Tokyo on a number of fronts. This where we had spent a few days (and experienced its month, as I write this at the multiple subway trains) to the freezing northern end of March, we are into Japanese island of Hokkaido (the temperature varied the first week of a country- only a couple of degrees either side of freezing for wide lockdown with the three days we were there), a journey of about everyone self-isolating at 1,000km in 4 hours. And the train arrived exactly on home, no public contacts, and as you are probably time! (The attached photo is actually the rear of the aware, the Ferrymead Tramway and our tramway train when travelling north, and the front when and trolley bus activities, along with our Social travelling south).
  • Preserved Coaching Stock of British Railways

    Preserved Coaching Stock of British Railways

    PRESERVED COACHING STOCK OF BRITISH RAILWAYS AMENDMENT SHEET NUMBER 23 December 1997/January 1998/February 1998 LOCOMOTIVE HAULED COACHING STOCK 1) Additions a) Southern Railway Stock B 210 083618 Isle of Wight Steam Railway PMV 1156 DS156 Ebberston Station near Pickering PMV 1193 DS166 Bluebell Railway PMV 1350 DS1385 Gloucestershire-Warwickshire Railway PMV 1626 DB975568 Bristol Industrial Museum CCT 2373 DS70239 Bluebell Railway b) British Rail Mark 1 Passenger Carrying Coaching Stock RB 1672 Gloucestershire-Warwickshire Railway BCK 21273 DB977384 South Yorkshire Railway SK 24157 DB975162 Kent & East Sussex Railway BSK 34136 DB975459 Battlefield Steam Railway BSK 34368 DB975476 Spa Valley Railway BSK 34414 DB975128 Severn Valley Railway BSK 34698 DB977383 Mid-Norfolk Railway c) British Rail Mark 2 Passenger Carrying Coaching Stock BSO 9414 Spa Valley Railway d) British Rail Non Passenger Carrying Coaching Stock POS 80301 Great Central Railway CCT 94142 024672 Battlefield Steam Railway CCT 94772 DB977113 Kent & East Sussex Railway Body only remains 2) Deletions a) Southern Railway Stock TK 1020 DS70134 Broken up on site at the Kent & East Sussex Railway BUO 4438 7920 DB975279 Broken up on site at the Kent & East Sussex Railway 3) Movements a) Pullman Car Company Stock 136 MAID OF KENT MoD BAD Kineton b) Great Western Railway Stock MILK 2835 DW2835 Gloucestershire – Warwickshire Railway c) Southern Railway Stock LSWR/SR BTK 3204 DS70085 South Devon Railway under frame only remains BTK 1346 DS70201 083181 Rother Valley Railway BY 440 Rother Valley Railway PMV 1248 ADS161 Rother Valley Railway PMV 177 2012 ADS1035 Rother Valley Railway d) London, Midland & Scottish Railway Stock BG 31407 XDB977037 West Somerset Railway BGZ 32978 East Lancashire Railway e) London & North Eastern Railway Stock TK 3849 12961 DE320946 Kirkby Stephen East Station f) British Rail Mark 1 Passenger Carrying Coaching Stock SLF 2110 Llangollen Railway SLF 2127 Stored at Steamtown Railway Centre for Great Scottish & Western Railway Co.