King County Official Local Voters' Pamphlet
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
WTIA 2019 Seattle City Council General Election Endorsements
WTIA 2019 Seattle City Council General Election Endorsements The Washington Technology Industry Association (WTIA) is a trade association that combines the power of member companies to solve problems they cannot easily solve alone. Our purpose is to build a strong technology sector in a thriving community. Our strategic priorities are to... ● Cultivate new talent by operating the premier, nationally registered tech apprenticeship program; ● Use group buying power to deliver high value, affordable services to member companies; ● Create forums for industry, education, and government to collaborate effectively; ● Cultivate public policies that are well informed and build a thriving community. In support of those priorities, WTIA has engaged with candidates running for Seattle City Council. Seattle faces many challenges. What we need now are city council members who will genuinely engage in a productive dialogue with the technology sector, the most powerful job creation engine in a century to build a thriving and inclusive city. Together, we can and will build a strong city that ensures the next generation of residents continue to generate opportunity for all who call Seattle home. We interviewed eighteen candidates in-person with a panel of tech industry representatives. The following election endorsements are based on those interviews, review of their responses to a questionnaire, and discussions with other organizations and stakeholders tracking the primary election process. We looked for candidates who: demonstrated a willingness to learn about issues that matter to the tech industry and our employees and their families, expressed an interest in working with all constituents to solve the City’s problems and capitalize on its opportunities, will be accountable to their districts, and have a path to succeeding in the primary election. -
DSA Candidate Scorecard Seattle City Council 2019
DSA Candidate Scorecard Seattle City Council 2019 The Downtown Seattle Association engages candidates running for public office each election cycle to hear their priorities and thoughts on key issues that are important to downtown stakeholders and our 1,700 corporate, nonprofit and residential members. While we don’t endorse candidates, those who complete our questionnaire are scored on how closely they align with our priorities. Candidates field questions on key issues such as public safety, transportation, homelessness, economic competitiveness and the urban experience. District 1: West Seattle, South Park Phillip Tavel Lisa Herbold 89% 79% Incumbent Phillip is a public defender and former video game Lisa is currently on the City Council, representing developer. He ran for City Council in 2015 but didn’t District 1. She was first elected in 2015, and has advance past the primary election. focused on renter and worker rights. Questions asked by The Seattle Times: Questions asked by The Seattle Times: • What’s the city’s most important problem? • What’s the city’s most important problem? Not effectively and equitably delivering services Affordability/homelessness to address housing, mental health, public safety • What committee would you like to chair? and substance-use disorder issues. Public Safety • What committee would you like to chair? Gender Equity, Safe Communities, New Americans and Education For more info and full questionnaire responses, visit: downtownseattle.org/candidates District 2: Southeast Seattle, Georgetown Mark Solomon Tammy Morales 88% Declined to Participate Mark, a retired Air Force officer, is a crime- Tammy ran for City Council in 2015 and was prevention coordinator with the Seattle Police defeated. -
Edition 15F Introduction to the 2008 Primary Voters’ Pamphlet
STATE OF WASHINGTON Look inside for more about the Top 2 Primary VOTERS’’PAMPHLET VOTERS PAMPHLET August 19, 2008 Primary Washington’s New Top 2 Primary Washington has a new primary. You do not have Each candidate for partisan offi ce may state a political to pick a party. In each race, you may vote for any party that he or she prefers. A candidate’s preference one of the candidates listed. Th e two candidates does not imply that the candidate is nominated or who receive the most votes in the August Primary endorsed by the party, or that the party approves will advance to the November General Election. of or associates with that candidate. Look inside for more about the Top 2 Primary. PUBLISHED BY THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE AND KING COUNTY ELECTIONS EDITION 15F Introduction to the 2008 Primary Voters’ Pamphlet It’s your choice … it’s your voice. Dear King County voter: Congratulations on exercising your privilege and responsibility A lot has changed since the last presidential election in 2004. to take part in Washington’s elections − never more important Since then, King County Elections has worked tirelessly to than in this watershed 2008 election year. Our new Top 2 implement more than 300 reforms and recommendations Primary on August 19 will give you maximum choice, allowing resulting from outside audits, election experts, and the you the independence and freedom to “vote for the person, innovative work of elections staff. With these changes and not the party.” 19 successful elections behind us, King County is ready and energized for the August 19 primary. -
Doe V. Reed and the History of Anonymous Speech Abstract
Document1 5/17/2011 5:58 PM Chesa Boudin Publius and the Petition: Doe v. Reed and the History of Anonymous Speech abstract. This Note argues that signatures on petitions intended for use in direct democracy processes such as ballot initiatives should be subject to public scrutiny and disclosure. They should not benefit from free speech protections allowing for anonymity. Signatures used in these proceedings should not be considered petitions or speech at all, but rather lawmaking. Through historical, doctrinal, and prudential analysis, this Note distinguishes between core First Amendment rights, which might include signatures on a general petition with no legislative implications or minority associational rights, and speech-like activity that forms part of the regulated lawmaking process. author. Yale Law School, J.D. expected 2011; University of Oxford, M.Sc. 2006, 2004; Yale College, B.A. 2003. Special thanks to Professor Akhil Amar for his guidance and feedback throughout the research and writing of this Note. I am grateful to Cyrus Habib, whose work in, and familiarity with, this area of the law first exposed me to this research topic. Thanks also to Caitlin O’Brien and the rest of the editorial staff at The Yale Law Journal . 2140 publius and the petition note contents introduction 2142 i. doe v. reed: anonymous speech versus lawmaking in practice 2145 ii. the history of anonymous speech 2150 A. Anonymous and Pseudonymous Speech 2152 B. Historical Practice: Public Politics and Disclosure 2157 iii. anonymous speech and disclosure doctrine 2164 A. Anonymous Speech Doctrine: Talley and McIntyre 2164 B. Disclosure Doctrine 2169 iv. -
Praying for Government Officials
Praying for Government Officials 1 Timothy 2: 1-2 I urge then, first of all, that petitions, prayers, intercession and thanksgiving be made for all people- for kings and all those in authority, that we may live peaceful and quiet lives in all godliness and holiness. Federal Executive Branch President Joseph R Biden Vice President Kamala Devi Harris Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III Attorney General Monty Wilkinson US Senators & Representatives Senator Patty Murray Senator Maria Cantwell Representative Pramila Jayapal State Governor Jay Inslee State Senate Senator Jamie Pedersen Representative Nicole Macri Representative Frank V Chopp Seattle Local Representatives: Mayor Jenny A. Durkan Chief of Police Adrian Diaz Fire Chief Harold D. Scoggins Council President M. Lorena González Councilmember Lisa Herbold Councilmember Debora Juarez Councilmember Andrew J. Lewis Councilmember Tammy J. Morales Councilmember Teresa Mosqueda Councilmember Alex Pedersen Councilmember Kshama Sawant Councilmember Dan Strauss Seattle City Attorney Pete Holmes Pray that our officials will be filled with: Humility- For by the grace given my I say to every one of you: Do not think of yourself more highly than you ought, but rather think of yourself with sober judgement, in accordance with the faith God has distributed to each of you. (Romans 12:3) Wisdom- But the wisdom that comes from heaven is first of all pure; then peace-loving, considerate, submissive, full of mercy and good fruit, impartial and sincere (James 3:17) Courage- For the Spirit God gave us does not make us timid, but gives us power, love, and self- discipline. -
CYRUS HABIB "Nothing Was Impossible" by Bob Young Cyrus Habib "Nothing Was Impossible"
CYRUS HABIB "Nothing Was Impossible" By Bob Young Cyrus Habib "Nothing Was Impossible" oing into junior high school, Kamyar Habib flirted with reinventing himself. It wouldn’t be the last time. He was a blind, cancer-surviving Iranian Amer- ican living in a Seattle suburb. And he was tired of kids making fun of his Gname by calling him “Caviar.” “You’re right, I’m a delicacy,” he’d snap back. Armored wit had become his first line of defense. He didn’t have a middle name, so he gave himself one, after a daring leader of ancient Persia, Cyrus the Great. He went by “K.C.” which added a hint of hipness to a bookish teenager who played jazz piano. By the time he got to New York City and Columbia University at 18, he was fully “Cyrus.” Debonair in designer clothes and sunglasses, he became a published photographer. “In New York you can be a new man,” Habib says, quoting the musi- cal “Hamilton.” He won a scholarship to Oxford, the oldest university in the English-speaking world, and aspired to be a literature professor. Then, he took a hard turn from aca- demia’s abstractions toward the corridors of power. He opted to become an attorney and headed to Yale, where he edited the law journal, while working, in his spare time, for Google in London and Goldman Sachs on Wall Street. In 2012, Habib veered into politics, after sizing up the current crop of office holders, and concluding, I can do that. Just four years later, he became Washington’s lieutenant governor, and the first Iranian American elected to a statewide office in the U.S. -
Publius and the Petition: Doe V
THE YALE LAW JOURNAL CHESA BOUDIN Publius and the Petition: Doe v. Reed and the History of Anonymous Speech ABSTRACT. This Note argues that signatures on petitions intended for use in direct democracy processes such as ballot initiatives should be subject to public scrutiny and disclosure. They should not benefit from free speech protections allowing for anonymity. Signatures used in these proceedings should not be considered petitions or speech at all, but rather lawmaking. Through historical, doctrinal, and prudential analysis, this Note distinguishes between core First Amendment rights, which might include signatures on a general petition with no legislative implications or minority associational rights, and speech-like activity that forms part of the regulated lawmaking process. AUTHOR. Yale Law School, J.D. expected 2011; University of Oxford, M.Sc. 2oo6, 2004; Yale College, B.A. 2003. Special thanks to Professor Akhil Amar for his guidance and feedback throughout the research and writing of this Note. I am grateful to Cyrus Habib, whose work in, and familiarity with, this area of the law first exposed me to this research topic. Thanks also to Caitlin O'Brien and the rest of the editorial staff at The Yale Law Journal. 2140 NOTE CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2142 1. DOE V. REED: ANONYMOUS SPEECH VERSUS LAWMAKING IN PRACTICE 2145 II. THE HISTORY OF ANONYMOUS SPEECH 2150 A. Anonymous and Pseudonymous Speech 2152 B. Historical Practice: Public Politics and Disclosure 2157 III.ANONYMOUS SPEECH AND DISCLOSURE DOCTRINE 2164 A. Anonymous Speech Doctrine: Talley and McIntyre 2164 B. Disclosure Doctrine 2169 IV. PRUDENTIAL CONSIDERATIONS 2175 A. State Regulation Can Promote Transparency and Deter Fraud 2176 B. -
King County Elections
Election Results Updated: 11/24/2015 3:40:42 PM General and Special Election November 3, 2015 Official Final State State of Washington Ballots counted: 467,608 *Registered voters: 1,193,706 39.17% Initiative Measure No. 1366 Yes 175,096 38.68% No 277,532 61.32% Initiative Measure No. 1401 Yes 351,669 77.17% No 104,023 22.83% Advisory Vote No. 10 Repealed 158,580 36.33% Maintained 277,962 63.67% Advisory Vote No. 11 Repealed 146,612 33.19% Maintained 295,146 66.81% Advisory Vote No. 12 Repealed 216,731 49.45% Maintained 221,590 50.55% * Reflects the voter registration count as of election day, November 3, 2015 Page 1 of 113 Election Results Updated: 11/24/2015 3:40:42 PM General and Special Election November 3, 2015 Official Final State Advisory Vote No. 13 Repealed 214,766 49.53% Maintained 218,866 50.47% * Reflects the voter registration count as of election day, November 3, 2015 Page 2 of 113 Election Results Updated: 11/24/2015 3:40:42 PM General and Special Election November 3, 2015 Official Final State Legislative District No. 30 Ballots counted: 22,725 *Registered voters: 63,971 35.52% Representative Position No. 2 Teri Hickel (Prefers Republican Party) 11,953 54.56% Carol Gregory (Prefers Democratic Party) 9,899 45.19% Write-in 55 0.25% * Reflects the voter registration count as of election day, November 3, 2015 Page 3 of 113 Election Results Updated: 11/24/2015 3:40:42 PM General and Special Election November 3, 2015 Official Final County King County Ballots counted: 467,608 *Registered voters: 1,193,706 39.17% Charter Amendment No. -
Washington State 2015 Gas Tax Increase
Washington Senate Bill (2015) Title of Bill: Senate Bill 5987 Purpose: A $16 billion, 16-year transportation plan, which included an 11.9 cents-per-gallon gas tax increase—gradually implemented beginning Aug. 1, 2015, and fully applied on July 1, 2016—and an increase in transportation-related fees, including those for overweight vehicles. The bill also permits Sound Transit residents to vote on a plan to increase taxes for an additional $15 billion in order to expand the region’s light rail system. Status of Amendment: Passed Washington Senate Bill 5987 (2015) Signed into law: July 15, 2015 Senate House FOR 37 54 AGAINST 7 44 History State Gas Tax Before SB 5987, drivers in Washington state paid a flat excise tax on gasoline of 37.5 cents-per-gallon. That amount was last set in 2005, when the state legislature approved a 9.5 cents-per-gallon state gas tax increase (phased in over four years). The package, including an increase in vehicle weight fees, was estimated to raise $8.5 billion over a 16-year period. Previous gas tax increases were implemented in 2003, 1991, and 1990. Gas Tax Distribution & Transportation Funding Sources Washington state’s highway and ferry system is funded through a combination of motor vehicle fuel taxes (23%); vehicle licenses, permits, and fees (12%); federal funds (26%); bonding (23%), and other sources such as tolling, ferry fares, and local funding (16%).i The transportation budget pays for “maintaining, preserving, and improving the highway system; operating ferries; motor vehicle registration; and enforcing traffic laws on the state highway system.” ii The state’s gas tax of 37.5 cents-per-gallon was constitutionally dedicated for ‘highway purposes’ in the 18th Amendment (November 1944). -
General Election November3
VOTERS’ PAMPHLET Washington State Elections & Cowlitz County General Election November 3 2020 2020 Official Publication Ballots mailed to voters by October 16 (800) 448-4881 | sos.wa.gov 2 A message from Assistant Secretary of State Mark Neary On behalf of the Office of the Secretary of State, I am pleased to present the 2020 General Election Voters’ Pamphlet. We offer this comprehensive guide as a reference to help you find information on the candidates and statewide measures that appear on your ballot. This general election gives you the opportunity to have a say in our government at the local, state, and national levels, and to choose who will serve as our nation’s next president. In order to have your voice heard, you must be registered to vote. Voter registration forms that are mailed or completed online must be received by October 26, and we encourage you to check your registration information today at VoteWA.gov. If you are reading this message after October 26 and you are not registered, have moved since the last time you voted, or did not receive a ballot, you can go to your local elections office or voting center during regular business hours through 8 p.m. on Election Day to register to vote and receive a ballot. Once you have completed your ballot, you can send it via U.S. mail — no postage needed — but remember, all ballots must be postmarked by November 3. A late postmark could disqualify your ballot. The USPS recommends that you mail a week before Election Day. -
Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012
VERIZON POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS JANUARY – DECEMBER 2012 1 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012 A Message from Craig Silliman Verizon is affected by a wide variety of government policies ‐‐ from telecommunications regulation to taxation to health care and more ‐‐ that have an enormous impact on the business climate in which we operate. We owe it to our shareowners, employees and customers to advocate public policies that will enable us to compete fairly and freely in the marketplace. Political contributions are one way we support the democratic electoral process and participate in the policy dialogue. Our employees have established political action committees at the federal level and in 20 states. These political action committees (PACs) allow employees to pool their resources to support candidates for office who generally support the public policies our employees advocate. This report lists all PAC contributions, corporate political contributions, support for ballot initiatives and independent expenditures made by Verizon in 2012. The contribution process is overseen by the Corporate Governance and Policy Committee of our Board of Directors, which receives a comprehensive report and briefing on these activities at least annually. We intend to update this voluntary disclosure twice a year and publish it on our corporate website. We believe this transparency with respect to our political spending is in keeping with our commitment to good corporate governance and a further sign of our responsiveness to the interests of our shareowners. Craig L. Silliman Senior Vice President, Public Policy 2 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012 Political Contributions Policy: Our Voice in the Political Process What are the Verizon Good Government Clubs? and the government agencies administering the federal and individual state election laws. -
Seattle Times Article New City Council Bill Would Temporarily Loosen
New city council bill would temporarily loosen restrictions on home-based businesses in Seattle Callie Craighead, Seattle P-I Feb. 24, 2021Updated: Feb. 24, 2021 3:25 p.m. 3 1of3 Yonder Cider Yonder Cider via Yelp • • • A new bill being considered in the Seattle City Council's Land Use and Neighborhoods Committee could loosen land use restrictions and provide more flexibility for microbusinesses operating out of homes or garages. The "Bringing Business Home" bill, proposed by Councilmember Dan Strauss and Council President Lorena Gonzalez, comes after the closure of Yonder Cider's "garage bar" retail site in Greenwood following a neighbor complaint that the business was operating too close to a church and school and blocking sidewalks. The retail site opened in August 2020 with a walk-up model amid the pandemic, selling growler fills and cans. The forced closure was highly unpopular, and the cidery received over 4,100 signatures on a petition of support. According to the city announcement, the bill would temporarily suspend these regulations for home-based businesses: • Customer visits are by appointment only • There is no evidence of the home-based business visible from the exterior of the structure • No more than two persons who are not residents of the building may work in a home-based business • The home-based business shall not cause a substantial increase in on-street parking congestion or a substantial increase in traffic within the immediate vicinity. This would allow for walk-up customers and lift employment restrictions. The bill would also allow these businesses to have a 720 square inch illuminated sign.