DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report of the Select Committee on the Murray River, South

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Pp 222 SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SELECT COMMITTEE on the MURRAY RIVER FINAL REPORT July 2001 South Australian Select Committee on the Murray River Final Report – 2001 South Australian Select Committee on the Murray River Final Report – 2001 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD 3 PRIORITY RECOMMENDATIONS 5 RECOMMENDATIONS 8 1 INTRODUCTION 17 1.1 Appointment of Committee .................................................................................... 17 1.2 Terms of Reference ............................................................................................... 17 1.3 Membership ........................................................................................................... 17 1.4 Committee Powers ................................................................................................ 17 1.5 Chairman’s vote..................................................................................................... 18 1.6 Disclosure of Evidence .......................................................................................... 18 1.7 Conduct of Inquiry.................................................................................................. 18 2. BACKGROUND 19 2.1 Key achievements to date ..................................................................................... 19 2.2 About the Murray-Darling Basin............................................................................. 21 ECONOMIC VALUES 22 SOCIAL VALUES 23 ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES 24 2.3 South Australia’s portion of the Murray-Darling Basin ........................................... 25 3. ADMINISTRATIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS 27 3.1 Murray-Darling Basin Initiative............................................................................... 28 3.2 Murray-Darling Basin Agreement .......................................................................... 28 3.3 Murray-Darling Basin Ministerial Council............................................................... 28 3.4 Murray-Darling Basin Commission ........................................................................ 29 3.5 Community Advisory Committee ........................................................................... 30 3.6 Legislative framework ............................................................................................ 30 3.7 State agencies ....................................................................................................... 31 3.8 Statutory bodies..................................................................................................... 32 3.9 Local Government ................................................................................................. 34 3.10 Local Action Planning Groups ............................................................................... 37 4. KEY ISSUES 38 4.1 Institutional framework........................................................................................... 38 MURRAY-DARLING BASIN INITIATIVE 38 INTEGRATED CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT 39 RIVER MURRAY CATCHMENT WATER MANAGEMENT BOARD 41 LOCAL GOVERNMENT 42 LOCAL ACTION PLANNING GROUPS 42 4.2 Salinity ................................................................................................................... 43 MURRAY-DARLING BASIN SALINITY AND DRAINAGE STRATEGY 43 THE SALINITY AUDIT OF THE MURRAY-DARLING BASIN 44 DRAFT MURRAY-DARLING BASIN SALINITY MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 45 FUTURE IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT 46 SALT INTERCEPTION SCHEMES 46 LAND AND WATER MANAGEMENT PLANS 46 IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT PLANS 47 RIVER MURRAY SALINITY STRATEGY 47 South Australian Select Committee on the Murray River Final Report – 2001 2 4.3 The Cap ................................................................................................................. 48 REVIEW OF THE OPERATION OF THE CAP 49 STATUS OF THE CAP 50 4.4 Community involvement ........................................................................................ 51 4.5 Environmental flows............................................................................................... 51 ENVIRONMENTAL WATER REQUIREMENTS 53 WATER TRUST OR ‘ACCOUNT’ FOR THE LOWER-MURRAY DARLING 53 4.6 Water resources and use....................................................................................... 53 COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENTS WATER REFORMS 55 SNOWY MOUNTAINS HYDRO-ELECTRIC AUTHORITY CORPORATISATION 55 LOSSES FROM THE MURRAY-DARLING SYSTEM 58 WATER ALLOCATION, USE AND METERING 58 IRRIGATION 59 WATER TRADING 62 URBAN WATER SUPPLIES 64 WATER QUALITY 64 IMPLICATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE 65 4.7 Biodiversity ............................................................................................................ 65 4.8 Wetland management............................................................................................ 66 4.9 Land use change ................................................................................................... 68 4.10 Inland fisheries management................................................................................. 69 INLAND SALINE AQUACULTURE 71 4.11 Investment in the Murray-Darling Basin................................................................. 71 BASIN SUSTAINABILITY PROGRAM 71 COST SHARING ARRANGEMENTS 72 CAPACITY BUILDING 72 FUNDING AND RESOURCES 73 5. KEY FINDINGS 74 GENERAL 74 INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORKS 74 SALINITY 77 THE CAP 79 ENVIRONMENTAL FLOWS 80 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT 81 WATER USE AND MANAGEMENT 81 WETLAND MANAGEMENT 84 BIODIVERSITY 84 LAND MANAGEMENT 85 INVESTMENT IN THE MURRAY-DARLING BASIN 85 RIVER MURRAY INLAND FISHERY 86 Acronyms ........................................................................................................................ 88 Glossary of Terms........................................................................................................... 89 Bibliography .................................................................................................................... 93 Appendices A: Written submissions and papers B: Witnesses before the Committee C: Findings and Recommendation from the Environment, Resources and Development Committee’s inquiry into Fish Stocks of Inland Waters. South Australian Select Committee on the Murray River Final Report – 2001 3 FOREWORD The Select Committee on the Murray River is pleased to table its Final Report. The River Murray is vitally important to the quality of life enjoyed by all South Australians. South Australia would be in a precarious position indeed if we could not rely on a secure supply of water from the River Murray. Through this Select Committee, the South Australian Parliament has successfully managed to bring together members from various political persuasions and remove the politics to prepare a consensus report that outlines a direction for the future use and management of the River Murray in South Australia. Much has been spoken and written about the sharing, management and use of the land, water and other environmental resources of the River Murray and the wider Murray-Darling Basin. The large body of evidence received by the Select Committee is testimony to this statement. Members of the Select Committee regard themselves as fortunate to have had the opportunity to observe the unique natural beauty of the Murray-Darling Basin, gain an appreciation for the complexities associated with the management of this multi-faceted resource and meet with a range of people from across the Basin who depend on the Basin’s natural resources for their well being. During this inquiry, the Select Committee has become increasingly conscious of the fact that while development of the Basin’s resources has delivered considerable economic and social benefits, these benefits have come at a very significant environmental cost, at both a State and Basin-wide level. The magnitude of this cost is well established in South Australia and the middle reaches of the Basin, but only now becoming apparent in the upstream reaches. If we want the Murray-Darling system to continue to provide economic and social benefits into the future we must change our current approach to the sharing, management and use of the Basin’s natural resources. Having said this, the Select Committee acknowledges that many significant changes have been achieved. There is, however, much more to be done. The new Integrated Catchment Management (ICM) framework, developed by the Murray-Darling Basin Ministerial Council is recognised by the Committee as another important step along the path of change. Particularly encouraging in the ICM framework is its commitment to establish targets for catchment health. This report contains 96 recommendations, and these are relevant at both a State and Basin- wide level. The Select Committee believes that action on all recommendations is essential to improving the health and management of the River Murray, especially in South Australia. In formulating its recommendations, the Select Committee identified a number of underlying themes: • Adaptive management Our current approach to the use and management of the Basin’s natural resources is not sustainable. Resource management must undergo fundamental change, and this can only be based upon the best available scientific knowledge. As new information becomes available, there will be a need for further change. • Commitment There are no quick fixes. Improving the health of the Murray-Darling system and moving towards sustainable development will require a long-term commitment by communities and governments.
Recommended publications
  • Sixteen Years of Labor Government in South Australia, 2002-2018

    Sixteen Years of Labor Government in South Australia, 2002-2018

    AUSTRALASIAN PARLIAMENTARY REVIEW Parliament in the Periphery: Sixteen Years of Labor Government in South Australia, 2002-2018* Mark Dean Research Associate, Australian Industrial Transformation Institute, Flinders University of South Australia * Double-blind reviewed article. Abstract This article examines the sixteen years of Labor government in South Australia from 2002 to 2018. With reference to industry policy and strategy in the context of deindustrialisation, it analyses the impact and implications of policy choices made under Premiers Mike Rann and Jay Weatherill in attempts to progress South Australia beyond its growing status as a ‘rustbelt state’. Previous research has shown how, despite half of Labor’s term in office as a minority government and Rann’s apparent disregard for the Parliament, the executive’s ‘third way’ brand of policymaking was a powerful force in shaping the State’s development. This article approaches this contention from a new perspective to suggest that although this approach produced innovative policy outcomes, these were a vehicle for neo-liberal transformations to the State’s institutions. In strategically avoiding much legislative scrutiny, the Rann and Weatherill governments’ brand of policymaking was arguably unable to produce a coordinated response to South Australia’s deindustrialisation in a State historically shaped by more interventionist government and a clear role for the legislature. In undermining public services and hollowing out policy, the Rann and Wethearill governments reflected the path dependency of responses to earlier neo-liberal reforms, further entrenching neo-liberal responses to social and economic crisis and aiding a smooth transition to Liberal government in 2018. INTRODUCTION For sixteen years, from March 2002 to March 2018, South Australia was governed by the Labor Party.
  • June 1998 Mra Sa Centrestand June 1998

    June 1998 Mra Sa Centrestand June 1998

    JUNE 1998 MRA SA CENTRESTAND JUNE 1998 In the heart of the city! Get your arse into gear and buy wa~n miller leather AUSTRALIAN MADE TO QUALITY STANDARDS Check us out for ... 'LADIES &MENS JACKETS, PANTS ..... G& AND VESTS ~;p...-... • TOURING SUITS HONDA ~ • RACE SUITS we"IIlIl ... -MADETO MEASURE SERVICE AVAILABLE \7 Un~)' ROJII. Park~jOc SA j)(,J Ph: (08) 8272 7655 Fa~: (08) 8272 1935 CaJl U3 (0; VO:" local stOO:/sl i i INStJRANGF I TD A.C,'l OOHI7.....0 6IeEGLASlico MOTORCYCLE 'Bum 088323 8865 108 KING Wll.LIAMS STREET ADELAIDE 5000 235 Main Road McLaren Vale SA 51 71 CONSIDER THE FAX: (08) 8323 8553 BENEFITS••••••• " Replacement Policy on New Bikes. IAN WILLIAMS TUNING " Up to 60 ~/o No Claim Bonus. " $ 5 000 000 Third Party Cover. lit Agreed Sum Insured. MIKUNI CARBlJRETORS-IETS-SPARE PARTS RING WENDY FOR YOUR NEXT FLAT SLIDE CARBLTRETORS NEW WITH ACCELEKATOR PUMP MOTORCYCLE INSURANCE QUOTE ON SIZES ]] J6 42 45 mm 68 RICHMOND RD KESWICK 8213 9299 (08) 8293 6677 PAGE 2 MRA SA CENTRESTAND JUNE 1998 COMMITTEE MEMBERS 1997 - 1998 M.R.A. President JeJfGaden (08) 83963742 MOTORCYCLE RIDERS Vice President David Povey (08) 8264 4453 ASSOCIATION INC. Secretary Paul Morgan (08) 8395 7137 Fax: (08) 8395 7138 VOL. 14 NO.2 Treasurer Ian 'Milo' Marlow (08) 8268 3654 MARCH 1998 Centrestand Editor Harald Lindemann (08) 82604461 Produced and published by the Memberships Adrian Gibbs (08) 8250 7668 Motorcycle Rider's Association of South Road Safety Rob Wells (015) 976947 Australia Incorporated. Publicity Aiden Hanafin (08) 83464071 Minutes Secretary Robyn Gaden (08) 83963742 PRINT POST APPROVAL PUBLICATION Register Liaison Les Dicker (08) 8262 2209 NO.
  • The Coorong Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth Directions for a Healthy Future

    The Coorong Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth Directions for a Healthy Future

    The Community Consultation Report: Murray Futures: Lower Lakes & Coorong Recovery Community Consultation Report The Coorong, Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth: Directions for a Healthy Future APPENDICES June 2009 Page 1 The Community Consultation Report: Murray Futures: Lower Lakes & Coorong Recovery Appendices Appendix 1 Promotion - Distribution Points 3 Appendix 2 Promotion - Media Coverage 6 Appendix 3 Promotion - Advertisements & Web Copy 7 Appendix 4 Community Information Sessions – Notes 22 Appendix 5 Community Information Sessions - PowerPoint Presentation 44 Appendix 6 Community Information Sessions - Feedback Survey 49 Appendix 7 Targeted Meetings - Notes 53 Appendix 8 Targeted Meetings - (Example) PowerPoint Presentation 64 Appendix 9 Written Submissions - List 67 Appendix 10 Written Submissions - Summaries 69 Appendix 11On-line Survey Report (from Ehrenberg-Bass) 107 Page 2 The Community Consultation Report: Murray Futures: Lower Lakes & Coorong Recovery Appendix 1 Promotion - Distribution Points Councils: Alexandrina Council Coorong District Council Strathalbyn Council Office Coorong District Council (Tailem Bend and Tintinara) Mt Barker District Council Rural City of Murray Bridge Libraries: Coomandook Community Library DEWHA Library Goolwa Public Library Meningie Community Library Mount Barker Community Library Mt Compass Library Murray Bridge Library National Library of Australia ACT Library Port Elliot Library SA Parliamentary Library State Library Adelaide Strathalbyn Community Library Tailem Bend Community Library Tintinara
  • Political Chronicles

    Political Chronicles

    Australian Journal of Politics and History: Volume 54, Number 2, 2008, pp. 289-341. Political Chronicles Commonwealth of Australia July to December 2007 JOHN WANNA The Australian National University and Griffith University The Stage, the Players and their Exits and Entrances […] All the world’s a stage, And all the men and women merely players; They have their exits and their entrances; [William Shakespeare, As You Like It] In the months leading up to the 2007 general election, Prime Minister John Howard waited like Mr Micawber “in case anything turned up” that would restore the fortunes of the Coalition. The government’s attacks on the Opposition, and its new leader Kevin Rudd, had fallen flat, and a series of staged events designed to boost the government’s stocks had not translated into electoral support. So, as time went on and things did not improve, the Coalition government showed increasing signs of panic, desperation and abandonment. In July, John Howard had asked his party room “is it me” as he reflected on the low standing of the government (Australian, 17 July 2007). Labor held a commanding lead in opinion polls throughout most of 2007 — recording a primary support of between 47 and 51 per cent to the Coalition’s 39 to 42 per cent. The most remarkable feature of the polls was their consistency — regularly showing Labor holding a 15 percentage point lead on a two-party-preferred basis. Labor also seemed impervious to attack, and the government found it difficult to get traction on “its” core issues to narrow the gap.
  • Political Chronicles Commonwealth of Australia

    Political Chronicles Commonwealth of Australia

    Australian Journal of Politics and History: Volume 53, Number 2, 2007, pp. 281-336. Political Chronicles Commonwealth of Australia July to December 2006 JOHN WANNA Australian National University and Griffith University Howard’s Divisive Style Comes to the Fore: Never Recant, Never Stand-down, Gradually Give Ground Questioned in late 2006 over the wisdom of invading Iraq, Prime Minister John Howard insisted he did not agree with those who went about “recanting everything they supported when they were in positions of authority”. He argued that […] in public life you take a position, and I think particularly of the decisions I have taken in the time I have been prime minister. I have to live with the consequences of those both now and into the future. And if I ever develop reservations, I hope I would have the grace to keep them to myself, because I think you take a position and you have got to live by that and be judged by it (Australian, 22 November 2006). His message was simple: if he had any personal reservations about invading Iraq he was not about to admit it or to say sorry. By late 2006, the Iraq occupation increasingly overshadowed the internal politics of both the US and the UK, but in Australia the quagmire of Iraq was a far less potent political factor. As one of the original “coalition of the willing”, Howard was implicated in the decision but had far less at stake than the other leaders and no list of casualties to inflict political pain. Moreover, the Labor opposition had not managed to turn the unpopular war into a political positive for itself.
  • Community Consultation Report: Murray Futures: Lower Lakes & Coorong Recovery

    Community Consultation Report: Murray Futures: Lower Lakes & Coorong Recovery

    The Community Consultation Report: Murray Futures: Lower Lakes & Coorong Recovery Community Consultation (Stage 2) Report APPENDICES The Coorong, Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth: Managing for a Healthy Future Page 1 The Community Consultation Report: Murray Futures: Lower Lakes & Coorong Recovery Appendices Appendix 1 Promotion - Distribution Points 3 Appendix 2 Promotion - Media Coverage 5 Appendix 3 Promotion – Printed Materials and Web Copy 8 Appendix 4 Targeted Meetings - Notes 12 Appendix 5 Targeted Meetings - (Example) PowerPoint Presentation 16 Appendix 6 Community Meetings by Request 18 Appendix 7 Focus Groups 19 Appendix 8 Field Visits and Landholder Interviews 24 Appendix 9 Socio Economic Impact Assessments 27 Appendix 10 Results of Phone Poll 47 Appendix 11 Summary Table (1800, Emails, Web) 89 Appendix 12 Comments (Written, Online Feedback Form, Template) – 90 Summaries Appendix 13 Management Actions Table 113 Appendix 14 Events & Shows 122 Appendix 15 Template/Online Feedback Form 123 Appendix 16 Examples – Management Action Flash Cards 155 Page 2 The Community Consultation Report: Murray Futures: Lower Lakes & Coorong Recovery Appendix 1 Promotion - Distribution Points Councils: Alexandrina Council Coorong District Council Strathalbyn Council Office Tailem Bend Office of Coorong District Council Tintinara Office of Coorong District Council Mount Barker District Council Rural City of Murray Bridge Libraries: Coomandook Community Library Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts Library Goolwa Public Library Meningie
  • Fairness and Unfairness in South Australian Elections

    Fairness and Unfairness in South Australian Elections

    Fairness and Unfairness in South Australian Elections Glynn Evans Thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Arts Politics Department University of Adelaide July 2005 Table Of Contents Chapter I Fairness and Unfairness in South Australian Elections 1 Theoretical Framework of Thesis 4 Single-Member Constituencies and Preferential Voting 7 Chapter 2 The Importance of Electoral System 11 Electoral Systems and Parly Systems t7 Duverger's 'Law' Confirmed in South Australia l9 Chapter 3 South Australia Under Weighted Voting 22 Block Vote Methods Pre-1936 23 Preferential Voting 1938-197 5 32 The 1969 Changes 38 Comparative Study: Federal Elections 1949-197 7 42 Chapter 4 South Australia Under One Vote One Value 51 South Aushalian Elections 197 7 -1982 52 The 1985 and 1989 Elections 58 What the 1991 Report Said 60 Comparative Study: the 1989 Westem Australian Election 67 Comparative Study: the 1990 Federal Election 7l Chapter 5 The X'airness Clause Develops 75 Parliamentary Debates on the Faimess Clause 75 The 199 1 Redistribution Report 80 Changes to Country Seats 81 Changes to Mehopolitan Seats 83 What Happened at the 1993 Election 86 The 1994 Redistribution and the Sitting Member Factor 88 The 1997 Election 95 Chapter 6 The Fairness Clause Put to the Test 103 The 1998 Redistribution 103 The2002 Election 106 Peter Lewis and the Court of Disputed Returns Cases 110 Chapter 7 Other Ways of Achieving Fairness Itg Hare-Clark t23 Mixed Systems: MMP and Parallel 13s New Zealand under MMP 136 Parallel Systems t45 Optional Preferential Voting t47
  • Water Reform in the Murray-Darling Basin

    Water Reform in the Murray-Darling Basin

    Basin Futures Water reform in the Murray-Darling Basin Basin Futures Water reform in the Murray-Darling Basin Edited by Daniel Connell and R. Quentin Grafton THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY E PRESS E PRESS Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Basin futures : water reform in the Murray-Darling basin / edited by Daniel Connell and R. Quentin Grafton. ISBN: 9781921862243 (pbk.) 9781921862250 (ebook) Subjects: Darling River Watershed (Qld. and N.S.W.)--Management. Murray River Watershed (N.S.W.-S. Aust.)--Management. Other Authors/Contributors: Connell, Daniel, 1947- Grafton, R. Quentin, 1962- Dewey Number: 333.730994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Cover image: © MDBA; Mouth of the Murray River, by Michael Bell Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2011 ANU E Press Contents Dedication . ix List of figures . xi List of tables and boxes . xiii Basin Futures: An introduction . xv Part I. Water and the Basin 1. Understanding the Basin and its Dynamics . 1 John Williams 2. Freshwater Ecosystem Conservation: Principles versus policy . 39 Jamie Pittock, C. Max Finlayson 3. Environmental Water: The Benefits of Ecological Goods and Services . 59 Richard H. Norris 4. Climate Change and its Impacts - Current understanding, future directions .
  • 12-SA 2006 Election Jaensch

    12-SA 2006 Election Jaensch

    The 2006 South Australian Election Dean Jaensch The 2006 (March 18) election in South Australia needs to be interpreted within a number of contexts. The 2002 election produced a hung parliament — in both houses. The 22-member Legislative Council, half of which was elected on a single State-wide electorate by proportional representation, produced a complex chamber: nine Labor, seven Liberal, three Democrat, one Family First, one No Pokies independent, and one former Labor member who had formed his own party — SA First. The election for the 47-member House of Assembly produced Labor 23 seats and Liberal 20. The balance of power was in the hands of a curious collection of four independents, all of whom had won in safe Liberal seats, and two of whom were former elected members of the Liberal party. Which major party would form government was in the hands of these. On the surface, the Liberal party might have been confident in attracting their support. But the Liberal party had burnt its bridges with all four before and during the campaign. It had campaigned bitterly against each, and had made it clear that each was persona non grata anywhere near the Liberal party. This proved to be a major error, and in the 2006 election, a fatal one. In the days after the 2002 election, both Labor and Liberal made overtures to one of the independents, Peter Lewis, who had prepared a draft ‘contract’ for consideration by his suitors. Both agreed, and Lewis decided to support the Rann Labor party ‘in the interests of stability of government’.

  • To View the Latest Edition of The

    Australasian Parliamentary Review JOURNAL OF THE AUSTRALASIAN STUDY OF PARLIAMENT GROUP Editor: Rodney Smith, Professor of Australian Politics, University of Sydney SPRING/SUMMER 2018 • VOL 33 NO 2 • RRP $A35 AUSTRALASIAN STUDY OF PARLIAMENT GROUP Established in 1978, the Australasian Study of Parliament Group (ASPG) is a politically nonpartisan body, focused on encouraging and stimulating research, writing, teaching and discussion about parliamentary institutions, particularly those of Australia, New Zealand and the South Pacific. The ASPG has a main Executive body and has established Chapters in all States and Territories of Australia and in New Zealand. These Chapters are supported by the institutions providing secretariat services to the respective legislatures in Australia and New Zealand. ASPG membership consists of parliamentarians, parliamentary officers, academics, teachers, journalists, students and other interested individuals. For more information about the ASPG, go to www.aspg.org.au. AUSTRALASIAN PARLIAMENTARY REVIEW The Australasian Parliamentary Review (APR) is the official journal of the ASPG. Material published in the APR is subject to copyright. Requests for permission to reproduce material from the APR should be directed to the APR Editor: Professor Rodney Smith, University of Sydney. Email: [email protected] ©Australasian Study of Parliament Group ISSN 1447-9125 EDITORIAL BOARD Dr Peter Aimer, University of Auckland Dr Harry Phillips, Parliament of Western Australia Jennifer Aldred, Public and Regulatory Policy
  • Political Chronicles Commonwealth of Australia

    Political Chronicles Commonwealth of Australia

    Australian Journal of Politics and History: Volume 51, Number 4, 2005, pp. 578-627. Political Chronicles Commonwealth of Australia January to June 2005 JOHN WANNA The Australian National University and Griffith University Latham’s Sudden Exit: a Political Victim of the Tsunami Federal Labor was shell-shocked at the outcome of the 2004 election, and remained so for months. Its courageous gamble with the new leader, Mark Latham, had not paid off. He was not sufficiently marketable to the electorate and had spectacularly self- imploded during the six-week campaign (or, alternatively, been out-manoeuvred by the Prime Minister John Howard). Latham was openly spoken about as “damaged goods” by his own side of politics. Instead of “hanging onto his every word” many supporters were now analysing his off-the-cuff remarks to see whether they made sense or would damage the party. More worrying for Labor was that it had lost ground at the election (losing a net of five seats) making the task of winning in 2007 even more unlikely. With Labor’s primary vote standing at 37.6 per cent and its two-party preferred vote at 47.2 per cent, demoralisation was pronounced. In the opinion polls, Labor fell further behind the Coalition following the election — down to 45 per cent to the Coalition’s 55 per cent on a two-party preferred basis in December, and 46 per cent to 54 per cent in February (Australian, 8 February 2005). While Howard sat on a satisfaction rating over 60 per cent, Latham’s own popularity dived from 54 per cent before the election to 34 per cent over Christmas and January.
  • Basin Futures Water Reform in the Murray-Darling Basin

    Basin Futures Water Reform in the Murray-Darling Basin

    Basin Futures Water reform in the Murray-Darling Basin Basin Futures Water reform in the Murray-Darling Basin Edited by Daniel Connell and R. Quentin Grafton THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY E PRESS E PRESS Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Basin futures : water reform in the Murray-Darling basin / edited by Daniel Connell and R. Quentin Grafton. ISBN: 9781921862243 (pbk.) 9781921862250 (ebook) Subjects: Darling River Watershed (Qld. and N.S.W.)--Management. Murray River Watershed (N.S.W.-S. Aust.)--Management. Other Authors/Contributors: Connell, Daniel, 1947- Grafton, R. Quentin, 1962- Dewey Number: 333.730994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Cover image: © MDBA; Mouth of the Murray River, by Michael Bell Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2011 ANU E Press Contents Dedication . ix List of figures . xi List of tables and boxes . xiii Basin Futures: An introduction . xv Part I. Water and the Basin 1. Understanding the Basin and its Dynamics . 1 John Williams 2. Freshwater Ecosystem Conservation: Principles versus policy . 39 Jamie Pittock, C. Max Finlayson 3. Environmental Water: The Benefits of Ecological Goods and Services . 59 Richard H. Norris 4. Climate Change and its Impacts - Current understanding, future directions .