DOCSLIB.ORG

Irish Wetland Bird Survey: Waterbird Status and Distribution 2009/10 – 2015/16

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Irish Wetland Bird Survey: Waterbird Status and Distribution 2009/10 – 2015/16 ISSN 1393 – 6670 N A T I O N A L P A R K S A N D W I L D L I F E S ERVICE IRISH WETLAND BIRD SURVEY: WATERBIRD STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION 2009/10 – 2015/16 Lesley Lewis, Brian Burke, Niamh Fitzgerald, David Tierney and Seán Kelly I R I S H W I L D L I F E M ANUAL S 106 National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) commissions a range of reports from external contractors to provide scientific evidence and advice to assist it in its duties. The Irish Wildlife Manuals series serves as a record of work carried out or commissioned by NPWS, and is one means by which it disseminates scientific information. Others include scientific publications in peer reviewed journals. The views and recommendations presented in this report are not necessarily those of NPWS and should, therefore, not be attributed to NPWS. Front cover, small photographs from top row: Coastal heath, Howth Head, Co. Dublin, Maurice Eakin; Red Squirrel Sciurus vulgaris, Eddie Dunne, NPWS Image Library; Marsh Fritillary Euphydryas aurinia, Brian Nelson; Puffin Fratercula arctica, Mike Brown, NPWS Image Library; Long Range and Upper Lake, Killarney National Park, NPWS Image Library; Limestone pavement, Bricklieve Mountains, Co. Sligo, Andy Bleasdale; Meadow Saffron Colchicum autumnale, Lorcan Scott; Barn Owl Tyto alba, Mike Brown, NPWS Image Library; A deep water fly trap anemone Phelliactis sp., Yvonne Leahy; Violet Crystalwort Riccia huebeneriana, Robert Thompson Main photograph: Light-bellied Brent Goose Branta bernicla hrota, Brian Burke. Irish Wetland Bird Survey: Waterbird Status and Distribution 2009/10 – 2015/16 Lesley Lewis, Brian Burke, Niamh Fitzgerald, David Tierney and Séan Kelly Keywords: Wintering waterbirds, Population estimates, Population trends, 1% thresholds, Site assessment, Distribution. Citation: Lewis, L. J., Burke, B., Fitzgerald, N., Tierney, T. D. & Kelly, S. (2019) Irish Wetland Bird Survey: Waterbird Status and Distribution 2009/10-2015/16. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 106. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. The NPWS Project Officer for this report was: Séan Kelly ([email protected]) ISSN 1393 – 6670 An tSeirbhís Páirceanna Náisiúnta agus Fiadhúlra 2019 National Parks and Wildlife Service 2019 An Roinn Cultúir, Oidhreachta agus Gaeltachta, 90 Sráid an Rí Thuaidh, Margadh na Feirme, Baile Átha Cliath 7, D07N7CV Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, 90 North King Street, Smithfield, Dublin 7, D07 N7CV Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................................. i Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................................. ii 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Methods ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Waterbirds covered by the scheme ................................................................................................... 3 2.2 The Core Count Scheme ..................................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Count methods .................................................................................................................................... 4 2.4 Additional related surveys ................................................................................................................ 4 2.5 Data analyses and interpretation ...................................................................................................... 5 2.5.1 Waterbird population estimates ................................................................................................... 5 2.5.2 Trends and annual indices ............................................................................................................ 5 2.5.3 Site importance ............................................................................................................................... 7 2.5.4 Pressures and threats ..................................................................................................................... 7 3 Coverage ........................................................................................................................................................ 8 4 Species Accounts ........................................................................................................................................ 11 4.1 Layout of species accounts............................................................................................................... 11 4.2 Notes on interpretation .................................................................................................................... 13 4.3 Mute Swan Cygnus olor..................................................................................................................... 14 4.4 Bewick’s Swan Cygnus columbianus bewickii .................................................................................. 17 4.5 Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus ........................................................................................................ 19 4.6 Pink-footed Goose Anser brachyrhyncus ......................................................................................... 23 4.7 Greenland White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons flavirostris ......................................................... 25 4.8 Greylag Goose Anser anser ............................................................................................................... 28 4.9 Greylag Goose (feral) Anser anser ................................................................................................. 31 4.10 Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis ....................................................................................................... 33 4.11 Canada Goose Branta canadensis ...................................................................................................... 36 4.12 Light-bellied Brent Goose Branta bernicla hrota ............................................................................. 38 4.13 Shelduck Tadorna tadorna ................................................................................................................. 41 4.14 Wigeon Mareca penelope .................................................................................................................... 43 4.15 Gadwall Mareca strepera ................................................................................................................... 46 4.16 Teal Anas crecca .................................................................................................................................. 48 4.17 Mallard Anas platyrhynchos .............................................................................................................. 51 4.18 Pintail Anas acuta ............................................................................................................................... 53 4.19 Shoveler Spatula clypeata ................................................................................................................... 55 4.20 Pochard Aythya ferina ........................................................................................................................ 58 4.21 Tufted Duck Aythya fuligula ............................................................................................................. 60 4.22 Scaup Aythya marila ........................................................................................................................... 63 4.23 Eider Somateria mollissima ................................................................................................................. 65 4.24 Long-tailed Duck Clangula hyemalis ................................................................................................ 67 4.25 Common Scoter Melanitta nigra ...................................................................................................... 69 4.26 Goldeneye Bucephala clangula .......................................................................................................... 71 4.27 Smew Mergellus albellus ................................................................................................................... 73 4.28 Red-breasted Merganser Mergus serrator ....................................................................................... 74 4.29 Goosander Mergus merganser .......................................................................................................... 77 4.30 Red-throated Diver Gavia stellata..................................................................................................... 79 4.31 Black-throated Diver Gavia arctica ................................................................................................... 81 4.32 Great Northern Diver Gavia immer .................................................................................................. 83 4.33 Little Grebe Tachybaptus ruficollis ................................................................................................... 85 4.34 Great Crested Grebe Podiceps cristatus ...........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hydrology Report Date
    Fingal East Meath Flood Risk Assessment and Management Study PROJECT: Fingal East Meath Flood Risk Assessment and Management Study DOCUMENT: HYDROLOGY REPORT DATE: January 2010 Fingal East Meath Flood Risk Assessment and Management Study Hydrology Report Checking and Approval Prepared by: Keshav Bhattarai December 2009 Senior Hydrologist Checked by: Scott Baigent December 2009 Associate / Senior Hydrologist Checked by: Jenny Pickles December 2009 Principal Water Management Consultant Approved by: Anne-Marie Conibear January 2010 Project Manager Contents amendment record Issue Revision Description Date Signed 1 0 1st draft for review Oct ‘09 2 1 Final Jan ‘10 3 2 Final Report Apr ‘10 (additional text in response to OPW comments) Halcrow Barry has prepared this report in accordance with the instructions of Fingal County Council, Meath County and the OPW for their sole and specific use. Any other persons who use any information contained herein do so at their own risk. Halcrow Barry Tramway House, 32 Dartry Road, Dublin 6, Ireland Tel +353 1 4975716, Fax +353 1 4975716 www.halcrow.com www.jbbarry.ie © Halcrow Barry, Fingal County Council, Meath County Council & Office of Public Works, 2010 i Fingal East Meath Flood Risk Assessment and Management Study Hydrology Report ii Fingal East Meath Flood Risk Assessment and Management Study Hydrology Report Executive Summary Fingal County Council (FCC), in conjunction with Meath County Council (MCC) and the Office of Public Works (OPW), are undertaking a flood risk assessment and management study in Fingal and East Meath – the Fingal East Meath Flood Risk Assessment and Management Study (FEM FRAMS). Halcrow Barry (HB) was commissioned to carry out the work on behalf of FCC/MCC/OPW.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Irish Goat Presentation Website
    The Old Irish Goat Society “To preserve and promote the Old Irish Goat" 'Handlebars', John Joyce Photography and Pamela Gray, Mulranny Heritage Map Flyer Artwork Old Irish Goat Heritage Value in Context Colin Johnston, Old Irish Goat Society Member Famine Reenactment, Mulranny Old Irish, Scottish and English Goat Heritage Value in Paintings Nora Drummond (1862 - 1949) Edgar Hunt (1876–1953) ‘Augustus Burke, Connemara Girl’, 1880 ‘A Mountain Goat’, Early 20th Century Old Irish Goat Heritage Value in Photographs 'A Hospitable Home in Ireland', 1909 Nanny Goat Market, Athlone, Ireland Travelling Herd, Wiltshire, England Travelling Herd, Surrey, England International Calls to Preserve the Old Irish Goat “The Irish goat, we maintain, is the best we have for the purpose, and it should be kept pure in type… to graft Nubian or Swiss blood into this breed does not add to its beauty, and, to our mind, impairs its usefulness.” Walter Paget, 1918 “There is a very compelling and urgent need to preserve the Old Irish Goat breed as a genetic and cultural resource. The Old Irish Goat is the ancient breed of the nation and the symbol of its past.” Raymond Werner, 2009 Old Irish Goat Breed Standard “The Old Irish Goat has a distinct regal image, with it’s long beard, oversized side-burns, flamboyant coiff, long coat and of course… it is ostentatiously adorned with a crown of impressive horns” - Seán Carolan Contrast between Old Irish and British Alpine Breeds Old Irish Goat Colour Patterns “…they moved off and then strung out like a neck-lace of multicoloured beads” - Ray Werner, Heritage Outlook, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Life of William Douglass M.Inst.C.E
    LIFE OF WILLIAM DOUGLASS M.INST.C.E. FORMERLY ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF IRISH LIGHTS BY THE AUTHOR OF "THE LIFE OF SIR JAMES NICHOLAS DOUGLASS, F.R.S." PRINTED FOR PRIVATE CIRCULATION 1923 CONTENTS CHAPTER I Birth; ancestry; father enters the service of the Trinity House; history and functions of that body CHAPTER II Early years; engineering apprenticeship; the Bishop Rock lighthouses; the Scilly Isles; James Walker, F.R.S.; Nicholas Douglass; assistant to the latter; dangers of rock lighthouse construction; resident engineer at the erection of the Hanois Rock lighthouse. CHAPTER III James Douglass re-enters the Trinity House service and is appointed resident engineer at the new Smalls lighthouse; the old lighthouse and its builder; a tragic incident thereat; genius and talent. CHAPTER IV James Douglass appointed to erect the Wolf Rock lighthouse; work commenced; death of Mr. Walker; James then becomes chief engineer to the Trinity House; William succeeds him at the Wolf. CHAPTER V Difficulties and dangers encountered in the erection of the Wolf lighthouse; zeal and courage of the resident engineer; reminiscences illustrating those qualities. CHAPTER VI Description of the Wolf lighthouse; professional tributes on its completion; tremor of rock towers life therein described in graphic and cheery verses; marriage. CHAPTER VII Resident engineer at the erection of a lighthouse on the Great Basses Reef; first attempts to construct a lighthouse thereat William Douglass's achievement description of tower; a lighthouse also erected by him on the Little Basses Reef; pre-eminent fitness of the brothers Douglass for such enterprises. CHAPTER VIII Appointed engineer-in-chief to the Commissioners of Irish Lights; three generations of the Douglasses and Stevensons as lighthouse builders; William Tregarthen Douglass; Robert Louis Stevenson.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Im Pact Assessment Report
    JSPE J Sheils Planning & Environmental Ltd Clashford Recovery Facilities Ltd. Naul Townland Naul Co. Meath For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. Waste Licence Application W0265-01 J Sheils Planning & Environmental Ltd 31 Athlumney Castle, Navan, Co Meath Phone/Fax: Ireland +353 46 9073997 Mobile: John Sheils +353 87 2730087 Email: [email protected] Environmental Impact Assessment Report Assessment Impact Environmental EPA Export 07-09-2018:03:36:40 Clashford Recovery Facilities Ltd i Clashford WRF TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION - 1 - 1.1 GENERAL BACKGROUND - 1 - 1.2 SITE LOCATION - 3 - 1.3 LEGISLATION - 4 - Environmental and Planning & Development Legislation - 4 - Waste Legislation - 5 - 1.4 SCREENING - 7 - Environmental Impact Assessment - 7 - Appropriate Assessment - 8 - 1.5 SCOPING & CONSULTATION - 9 - 1.6 FORMAT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT - 10 - 1.7 OBJECTIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT - 11 - 1.8 LAYOUT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT - 11 - 1.9 THE PROJECT TEAM - 13 - 1.10 APPLICANT - 14 - 1.11 ANY DIFFICULTIES IN COMPILING For inspection SPECIFIED purposes only. INFORMATION - 15 - Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. 1.12 REFERENCES - 15 - 2 CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES - 17 - 2.1 ALTERNATIVES EXAMINED - 17 - ‘Do-Nothing’ Alternative - 17 - Alternative Locations - 18 - Alternative Site Layout - 19 - Alternative Designs - 19 - Alternative Processes - 20 - Alternative Mitigation Measures - 20 - Consultation About Consideration
    [Show full text]
  • THE RIVERS SHANNON and ERNE Region Guide Belleek LOWER LOUGH ERNE
    THE RIVERS SHANNON AND ERNE Region guide Belleek LOWER LOUGH ERNE Approx time No. of locks Belleek 5 hr 1 Enniskillen Enniskillen 1 hr 0 Bellanaleck 9 hr 30 min 1 Bellanaleck 1 hr 0 Carrybridge UPPER LOUGH Carrybridge 2 hr 30 min 0 ERNE Inishfendra 2 hr 15 min 2 Ballyconnell 4 hr 12 hr 15 min 3 17 Inishfendra Ballinamore 6 hr 12 Ballyconnell Leitrim 45 min 45 min 0 0 L OUGH Y Intersection of River Shannon and branch to Lough Key A 30 min 30 min 0 0 ALLEN W Belturbet Ballinamore R E Carrick-on-Shannon T 3 hr 1 A Drumshanbo W N E Dromod 15 min Lough Key E R 0 O N Leitrim S H A N N Roosky 2 hr 10 hr 50 min 1 3 Tarmonbarry 1 hr 35 min 1 Boyle CARRICKON Lanesborough 4 hr 0 SHANNON Athlone 2 hr 15 min 1 Clonmacnoise 1 hr 0 8 hr 2 Shannonbridge 1 hr 45 min 0 Banagher Dromod 3 hr 1 Maximum speed allowed Portumna 5 on canals in km/h N 30 min 0 Roosky O N N Terryglass 2 hr 0 A There are no speed limits on rivers H 0 Tarmonbarry S Dromineer 45 min 4 hr 0 and in loughs, although please slow Garrykennedy 15 min 0 down as you pass moored boats, 0 Lanesborough Middle of Lough Derg 30 min 0 marinas, fishermen and in narrow Killaloe channels where your wash can cause damage to the bank and wildlife. Approx time No. of locks Pass oncoming boats on L OUGH Leitrim 1 hr 45 min 1 hr 45 min 3 3 REE Drumshanbo the right-hand side Approx time No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Proposed Dredging of the Navigation Channel at Sligo Harbour Vol
    The Proposed Dredging of the Navigation Channel at Sligo Harbour Vol. 3: Natura Impact Statement, to inform Appropriate Assessment rpsgroup.com Sligo Harbour Dredging Natura Impact Statement An ecological impact assessment to support the Appropriate Assessment Process Produced by Aqua-Fact International Services Ltd On behalf of RPS Limited Issued October 2012 AQUA-FACT INTERNATIONAL SERVICES ltd 12 KILKERRIN park TUAM rd GALWAY city www.aquafact.ie [email protected] tel +353 (0) 91 756812 fax +353 (0) 91 756888 Sligo Harbour Dredging RPS Ireland Ltd Natura Impact Statement October 2012 ii /JN1075 Sligo Harbour Dredging RPS Ireland Ltd Natura Impact Statement October 2012 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 1.1. The requirement for an assessment under Article 6 ............................... 1 1.2. The aim of this report .............................................................................. 2 1.3. Background – an overview of the Sligo Harbour Dredging project.......... 2 1.4. Consultation ............................................................................................ 3 1.4.1. Government Departments ............................................................................. 3 1.4.2. Other Bodies ................................................................................................. 3 1.5. Constraints.............................................................................................. 4 2. The Appropriate
    [Show full text]
  • Long Range Transportation Plan for Fish and Wildlife Service Lands In
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Long Range Transportation Plan for Fish and Wildlife Service Lands in Region 1 Final Draft September 2011 Long Range Transportation Plan for Fish and Wildlife Service Lands in Region 1 Primary Contact Jeff Holm Chief, R1 Branch of Transportation, Refuge Roads Coordinator, R1 & R8 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wildlife Refuge System 911 NE 11th Avenue Portland, OR 97232 [email protected] 503/231-2161 Acknowledgements Mike Marxen, Chief, R1 Branch of Visitor Services and Communication Paul Hayduk, R1 Hatchery and Facility Operations Coordinator Roxanne Bash, Western Federal Lands, Federal Highway Administration Special Thanks Steve Suder, National Coordinator, Refuge Transportation Program, FWS Nathan Caldwell, National Alternative Transportation Coordinator, FWS Alex Schwartz, R1 Landscape Architect Kirk Lambert, R1 Asset Management Coordinator David Drescher, Chief, R1 Refuge Information Susan Law, Western Federal Lands, Federal Highway Administration Pete Field, Western Federal Lands, Federal Highway Administration Consultant Team Atkins Melissa Allen, AICP Steve Hoover, AICP Tina Brand Cover Photo: David Pitkin/USFWS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service - Region 1 Long Range Transportation Plan for Fish and Wildlife Service Lands in Region 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................... .ES-1 Why was the Long Range Transportation Plan for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Lands initiated? .... .ES-1 What are the Goals for this Long Range Transportation
    [Show full text]
  • Audit Maritime Collections 2006 709Kb
    AN THE CHOMHAIRLE HERITAGE OIDHREACHTA COUNCIL A UDIT OF M ARITIME C OLLECTIONS A Report for the Heritage Council By Darina Tully All rights reserved. Published by the Heritage Council October 2006 Photographs courtesy of The National Maritime Museum, Dunlaoghaire Darina Tully ISSN 1393 – 6808 The Heritage Council of Ireland Series ISBN: 1 901137 89 9 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 Objective 4 1.2 Scope 4 1.3 Extent 4 1.4 Methodology 4 1.5 Area covered by the audit 5 2. COLLECTIONS 6 Table 1: Breakdown of collections by county 6 Table 2: Type of repository 6 Table 3: Breakdown of collections by repository type 7 Table 4: Categories of interest / activity 7 Table 5: Breakdown of collections by category 8 Table 6: Types of artefact 9 Table 7: Breakdown of collections by type of artefact 9 3. LEGISLATION ISSUES 10 4. RECOMMENDATIONS 10 4.1 A maritime museum 10 4.2 Storage for historical boats and traditional craft 11 4.3 A register of traditional boat builders 11 4.4 A shipwreck interpretative centre 11 4.5 Record of vernacular craft 11 4.6 Historic boat register 12 4.7 Floating exhibitions 12 5. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 12 5.1 Sources for further consultation 12 6. ALPHABETICAL LIST OF RECORDED COLLECTIONS 13 7. MARITIME AUDIT – ALL ENTRIES 18 1. INTRODUCTION This Audit of Maritime Collections was commissioned by The Heritage Council in July 2005 with the aim of assisting the conservation of Ireland’s boating heritage in both the maritime and inland waterway communities. 1.1 Objective The objective of the audit was to ascertain the following:
    [Show full text]
  • L.W. Environmental Planners
    I I For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. ,.. L.W. Environmental Planners .. ,e Mews 23 Farnham Street Cavan Tel: 049 4371447 /9 E-mail [email protected] EPA Export 28-06-2018:03:59:52 Mr. Anthony McCluskey Environmental Impact Assessment Report (E.I.A.R.} CONTENTS Page No. Non-Technical Summary 1 1. Introduction & Development Context 5 1.1 Description of site and proposed development 1.1.1 Scale of proposed developments 5 1.1.2 Planning/ Licensing History 6 1.1.3 Site Location 7 1.1.4 Topography 8 1.1.5 Physical description of the proposed development 9 1.1.6 Operation of the farm 10 2. Scoping of Environmental Impact Assessment 13 2.1 Data required to identify the main effects that the proposed 16 development is likely to have on the environment 2.2 Project Type as per EPA Draft Guidelines 17 3. Description of Reasonab.le Alternatives 18 For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. 4. Environmental Assessment 20 4.1.1 Description of the physical characteristics of the proposed 20 development and the land use requirements during construction and operation. 4.1.2 A description of the main characteristics of the production 21 processes, nature and quantity of materials used. 4.1.3 An estimate, by type and quantity, of expected residues and 22 emissions (including water, air and soil pollution, noise vibration, light, heat and radiation) and quantities and types of waste produced during the construction and operation phases.
    [Show full text]
  • Migratory Birds Index
    CAFF Assessment Series Report September 2015 Arctic Species Trend Index: Migratory Birds Index ARCTIC COUNCIL Acknowledgements CAFF Designated Agencies: • Norwegian Environment Agency, Trondheim, Norway • Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada • Faroese Museum of Natural History, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands (Kingdom of Denmark) • Finnish Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland • Icelandic Institute of Natural History, Reykjavik, Iceland • Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Greenland • Russian Federation Ministry of Natural Resources, Moscow, Russia • Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden • United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska CAFF Permanent Participant Organizations: • Aleut International Association (AIA) • Arctic Athabaskan Council (AAC) • Gwich’in Council International (GCI) • Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC) • Russian Indigenous Peoples of the North (RAIPON) • Saami Council This publication should be cited as: Deinet, S., Zöckler, C., Jacoby, D., Tresize, E., Marconi, V., McRae, L., Svobods, M., & Barry, T. (2015). The Arctic Species Trend Index: Migratory Birds Index. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna, Akureyri, Iceland. ISBN: 978-9935-431-44-8 Cover photo: Arctic tern. Photo: Mark Medcalf/Shutterstock.com Back cover: Red knot. Photo: USFWS/Flickr Design and layout: Courtney Price For more information please contact: CAFF International Secretariat Borgir, Nordurslod 600 Akureyri, Iceland Phone: +354 462-3350 Fax: +354 462-3390 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.caff.is This report was commissioned and funded by the Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF), the Biodiversity Working Group of the Arctic Council. Additional funding was provided by WWF International, the Zoological Society of London (ZSL) and the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS). The views expressed in this report are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Arctic Council or its members.
    [Show full text]
  • Behind the Scenes
    ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd 689 Behind the Scenes SEND US YOUR FEEDBACK We love to hear from travellers – your comments keep us on our toes and help make our books better. Our well-travelled team reads every word on what you loved or loathed about this book. Although we cannot reply individually to your submissions, we always guarantee that your feedback goes straight to the appropriate authors, in time for the next edition. Each person who sends us information is thanked in the next edition – the most useful submissions are rewarded with a selection of digital PDF chapters. Visit lonelyplanet.com/contact to submit your updates and suggestions or to ask for help. Our award-winning website also features inspirational travel stories, news and discussions. Note: We may edit, reproduce and incorporate your comments in Lonely Planet products such as guidebooks, websites and digital products, so let us know if you don’t want your comments reproduced or your name acknowledged. For a copy of our privacy policy visit lonelyplanet.com/ privacy. Anthony Sheehy, Mike at the Hunt Museum, OUR READERS Steve Whitfield, Stevie Winder, Ann in Galway, Many thanks to the travellers who used the anonymous farmer who pointed the way to the last edition and wrote to us with help- Knockgraffon Motte and all the truly delightful ful hints, useful advice and interesting people I met on the road who brought sunshine anecdotes: to the wettest of Irish days. Thanks also, as A Andrzej Januszewski, Annelise Bak C Chris always, to Daisy, Tim and Emma. Keegan, Colin Saunderson, Courtney Shucker D Denis O’Sullivan J Jack Clancy, Jacob Catherine Le Nevez Harris, Jane Barrett, Joe O’Brien, John Devitt, Sláinte first and foremost to Julian, and to Joyce Taylor, Juliette Tirard-Collet K Karen all of the locals, fellow travellers and tourism Boss, Katrin Riegelnegg L Laura Teece, Lavin professionals en route for insights, information Graviss, Luc Tétreault M Marguerite Harber, and great craic.
    [Show full text]
  • RSPB CENTRE for CONSERVATION SCIENCE RSPB CENTRE for CONSERVATION SCIENCE Where Science Comes to Life
    RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE Where science comes to life Contents Knowing 2 Introducing the RSPB Centre for Conservation Science and an explanation of how and why the RSPB does science. A decade of science at the RSPB 9 A selection of ten case studies of great science from the RSPB over the last decade: 01 Species monitoring and the State of Nature 02 Farmland biodiversity and wildlife-friendly farming schemes 03 Conservation science in the uplands 04 Pinewood ecology and management 05 Predation and lowland breeding wading birds 06 Persecution of raptors 07 Seabird tracking 08 Saving the critically endangered sociable lapwing 09 Saving South Asia's vultures from extinction 10 RSPB science supports global site-based conservation Spotlight on our experts 51 Meet some of the team and find out what it is like to be a conservation scientist at the RSPB. Funding and partnerships 63 List of funders, partners and PhD students whom we have worked with over the last decade. Chris Gomersall (rspb-images.com) Conservation rooted in know ledge Introduction from Dr David W. Gibbons Welcome to the RSPB Centre for Conservation The Centre does not have a single, physical Head of RSPB Centre for Conservation Science Science. This new initiative, launched in location. Our scientists will continue to work from February 2014, will showcase, promote and a range of RSPB’s addresses, be that at our UK build the RSPB’s scientific programme, helping HQ in Sandy, at RSPB Scotland’s HQ in Edinburgh, us to discover solutions to 21st century or at a range of other addresses in the UK and conservation problems.
    [Show full text]