Structural and Functional Studies of the Spliceosomal RNP Remodeling Enzyme Brr2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Structural and Functional Studies of the Spliceosomal RNP Remodeling Enzyme Brr2 Structural and functional studies of the spliceosomal RNP remodeling enzyme Brr2 Dissertation for the award of the degree "Doctor of Philosophy" Division of Mathematics and Natural Sciences of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen submitted by Karine Santos from São José do Rio Preto, Brazil Göttingen, 2012 Thesis committee Prof. Dr. Markus C. Wahl (reviewer) Freie University Berlin Institute for Chemistry and Biochemistry Department of Structural Biochemistry Berlin, Germany Prof. Dr. Ralf Ficner (reviewer) Georg August University Göttingen Institute for Microbiology and Genetics Department of Molecular Structural Biology Göttingen, Germany Prof. Dr. Detlef Doenecke Georg August University Göttingen Institute for Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology Department of Molecular Biology Göttingen, Germany Prof. Dr. Dirk Fasshauer University of Lausanne Faculty of Biology and Medicine Department of Cellular Biology and Morphology Lausanne, Switzerland Prof. Dr. Marina Rodnina Georg August University Göttingen Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry Department of Physical Biochemistry Göttingen, Germany Prof. Dr. Kai Tittmann Georg August University Göttingen Albrecht-von-Haller Institute Department of Bioanalytics Göttingen, Germany Date of oral examination: 20.11.2012 Affidavit I hereby declare that my thesis entitled "Structural and functional studies of the spliceosomal RNP remodeling enzyme Brr2" has been written independently and with no other sources and aids than quoted. This thesis (wholly or in part) has not been submitted elsewhere for any academic award or qualification. Karine Santos September, 2012 Göttingen Related publications Parts of this thesis were published in: Weber, G., Cristao, V.F., de L Alves, F., Santos, K.F., Holton, N., Rappsilber, J., Beggs, J.D., Wahl, M.C. (2011) Mechanism for Aar2p function as a U5 snRNP assembly factor. Genes Dev. 25(15):1601-12. DOI: 10.1101/gad.635911. Santos, K. F., Mozaffari-Jovin, S., Weber, G., Pena, V., Lührmann, R., Wahl, M. C. (2012) Structural basis for functional cooperation between tandem helicase cassettes in Brr2- mediated remodeling of the spliceosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109(43):17418-23. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1208098109. Mozaffari-Jovin, S., Santos, K.F., Hsiao, H.H., Urlaub, H., Wahl, M.C., Lührmann, R. (2012) The Prp8 RNase H-like domain inhibits Brr-mediated U4/U6 snRNA unwinding by blocking Brr2 loading onto the U4 snRNA. Genes Dev. 26(21):2422-34. DOI: 10.1101/gad.200949.112. Weber, G., Cristao, V.F., Santos, K.F., Jovin, S.M., Heroven, A.C., Holton, N., Lührmann, R., Beggs, J.D., Wahl, M.C. (2013) Structural Basis for dual roles of Aar2p in U5 snRNP assembly. Genes Dev. 27(5):525-40. DOI: 10.1101/gad.213207.113. Mozaffari-Jovin, S.*, Wandersleben, T.*, Santos, K.F.*, Will, C., Lührmann, R., Wahl, M.C. (2013) Inhibition of RNA helicase Brr2 by the C-terminal tail of the spliceosomal protein Prp8. Science. DOI:10.1126/science.1237515. *These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 pre-mRNA splicing .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.1 The mechanism of nuclear pre-mRNA splicing ............................................................................. 6 1.1.2 Components of the spliceosome ..................................................................................................... 9 1.1.3 Stepwise assembly of the spliceosome ......................................................................................... 12 1.1.4 Rearrangements of the RNA-RNA network during the splicing cycle.......................................... 15 1.1.5 Compositional changes within the spliceosome .......................................................................... 18 1.2 Helicases: enzymatic motors of the spliceosome ..................................................................................... 21 1.2.1 RNA helicases .............................................................................................................................. 21 1.2.1.1 DEAD-box family ................................................................................................................................ 23 1.2.1.2 DEAH/RHA family .............................................................................................................................. 24 1.2.1.3 Ski2-like family .................................................................................................................................... 24 1.2.2 Spliceosomal RNA helicases ........................................................................................................ 25 1.2.3 Brr2: a helicase essential for spliceosome catalytic activation ................................................... 27 1.2.4 Brr2 and Renititis pigmentosa ..................................................................................................... 31 1.2.5 Structural studies of spliceosomes and their components ........................................................... 32 1.3 Aim of this study ...................................................................................................................................... 33 2. Materials and methods ....................................................................................................... 37 2.1 Materials .................................................................................................................................................. 37 2.1.1 Chemicals .................................................................................................................................... 37 2.1.2 Buffer solutions and media components ...................................................................................... 39 2.1.3 Consumables ............................................................................................................................... 40 2.1.4 Chromatographic resins and columns ......................................................................................... 41 2.1.5 Molecular biology kits ................................................................................................................. 42 2.1.6 Nucleotides .................................................................................................................................. 42 2.1.7 Crystallization screens and kits ................................................................................................... 42 2.1.8 Instrumentation ........................................................................................................................... 43 2.1.9 Enzymes and proteins .................................................................................................................. 45 2.1.10 DNA oligonucleotides ................................................................................................................ 46 2.1.11 Plasmids .................................................................................................................................... 49 2.1.12 Insect cell lines .......................................................................................................................... 51 2.1.13 Bacterial strains ........................................................................................................................ 51 2.1.14 Software ..................................................................................................................................... 52 2.2 Methods ................................................................................................................................................... 53 2.2.1 Nucleic acid methods ................................................................................................................... 53 2.2.1.1 Determination of nucleic acid concentration ........................................................................................ 53 2.2.1.2 Agarose gel electrophoresis for DNA ................................................................................................... 53 2.2.1.3 DNA purification using agarose gel electrophoresis ............................................................................. 53 2.2.1.4 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ......................................................................................................... 53 2.2.1.5 Site-directed mutagenesis ..................................................................................................................... 54 2.2.1.6 Restriction digestion and ligation of DNA ............................................................................................ 54 2.2.1.7 Plasmid isolation from Escherichia coli cells ....................................................................................... 55 2.2.1.8 Plasmid verification .............................................................................................................................. 55 2.2.1.9 Radioactive labeling of the 5'-end of RNA oligonucleotides ................................................................ 55 2.2.2 Cell and cell culture methods .....................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Role of Cajal Bodies and Nucleolus in the Maturation of the U1 Snrnp in Arabidopsis
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by PubMed Central Role of Cajal Bodies and Nucleolus in the Maturation of the U1 snRNP in Arabidopsis Zdravko J. Lorkovic´*, Andrea Barta Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria Abstract Background: The biogenesis of spliceosomal snRNPs takes place in both the cytoplasm where Sm core proteins are added and snRNAs are modified at the 59 and 39 termini and in the nucleus where snRNP-specific proteins associate. U1 snRNP consists of U1 snRNA, seven Sm proteins and three snRNP-specific proteins, U1-70K, U1A, and U1C. It has been shown previously that after import to the nucleus U2 and U4/U6 snRNP-specific proteins first appear in Cajal bodies (CB) and then in splicing speckles. In addition, in cells grown under normal conditions U2, U4, U5, and U6 snRNAs/snRNPs are abundant in CBs. Therefore, it has been proposed that the final assembly of these spliceosomal snRNPs takes place in this nuclear compartment. In contrast, U1 snRNA in both animal and plant cells has rarely been found in this nuclear compartment. Methodology/Principal Findings: Here, we analysed the subnuclear distribution of Arabidopsis U1 snRNP-specific proteins fused to GFP or mRFP in transiently transformed Arabidopsis protoplasts. Irrespective of the tag used, U1-70K was exclusively found in the nucleus, whereas U1A and U1C were equally distributed between the nucleus and the cytoplasm. In the nucleus all three proteins localised to CBs and nucleoli although to different extent. Interestingly, we also found that the appearance of the three proteins in nuclear speckles differ significantly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reaction Mechanism of Cellular U Snrnp Assembly
    The Reaction Mechanism of Cellular U snRNP Assembly Dissertation zur Erlangung des naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorgrades der Bayerischen Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg vorgelegt von Ashwin Chari Aus Bangalore (Indien) Würzburg 2009 Eingereicht am: Mitglieder der Promotionskommission: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. M. Müller 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. U. Fischer 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. U. Scheer Tag des Promotionskolloquiums: Doktorurkunde ausgehändigt am: Erklärung Erklärung gemäss §4 Absatz 3 der Promotionsordnung der Fakultät für Biologie der Bayerischen Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg vom 15. März 1999 1. Hiermit erkläre ich ehrenwörtlich, dass ich die vorliegende Dissertation selbstständig angefertigt und keine anderen als die angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmittel benutzt habe. 2. Ich erkläre, dass die vorliegende Dissertation weder in gleicher noch in ähnlicher Form bereits in einem Prüfungsverfahren vorgelegen hat. 3. Ich erkläre, dass ich ausser den mit dem Zulassungsantrag urkundlich vorgelegten Graden keine weiteren akademischen Grade erworben oder zu erwerben versucht habe. Würzburg, 2009 Ashwin Chari Table of Contents 1. Summary 1 2. Zusammenfassung 5 3. Introduction 9 3.1 Principles Governing Macromolecular Complex Assembly in Vivo 9 3.2 Pre-mRNA Splicing 12 3.3 Architecture of Spliceosomal U snRNPs 14 3.4 The Cell Biology of U snRNP Biogenesis 16 3.5 U snRNP Assembly in Vivo is an Active, Factor-Mediated Process 19 3.6 References 22 4. Goals of this Thesis 29 5. Results 31 5.1 Taking an Inventory of the Subunits of the Human SMN-Complex 31 5.2 Definition of the Basic Architecture of the Human SMN-Complex 49 5.3 Mechanistic Aspects of Cellular U snRNP Assembly 65 5.4 Evolution of the SMN-Complex 115 6.
    [Show full text]
  • RNA-Protein Interactions of a Kink
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2005 Biophysical and Biochemical Investigation of an Archaeal Box C/D SRNP: RNA- Protein Interactions of a Kink Turn RNA within the Functional Enzyme Terrie Luong Moore Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES BIOPHYSICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL INVESTIGATION OF AN ARCHAEAL BOX C/D SRNP: RNA-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS OF A KINK TURN RNA WITHIN THE FUNCTIONAL ENZYME By TERRIE LUONG MOORE A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Summer Semester, 2005 The members of the Committee approve the dissertation of Terrie Luong Moore defended on May 3, 2005. ________________________________ Hong Li Professor Directing Dissertation ________________________________ Lloyd M. Epstein Outside Committee Member ________________________________ Timothy M. Logan Committee Member ________________________________ John G. Dorsey Committee Member Approved: ___________________________________________________ Naresh Dalal, Chair, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii I dedicate this work to my husband, Michael, for being there every step of the way and always giving me hope about the future. Without your love and support, this work would not have been possible. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my mentor, Dr. Hong Li, first and foremost for taking me into her lab and allowing me to grow intellectually. I would like to thank all of my committee members, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Srsf10 and the Minor Spliceosome Control Tissue-Specific and Dynamic
    SHORT REPORT Srsf10 and the minor spliceosome control tissue-specific and dynamic SR protein expression Stefan Meinke1, Gesine Goldammer1, A Ioana Weber1,2, Victor Tarabykin2, Alexander Neumann1†, Marco Preussner1*, Florian Heyd1* 1Freie Universita¨ t Berlin, Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Laboratory of RNA Biochemistry, Berlin, Germany; 2Institute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology, Charite´-Universita¨ tsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universita¨ t Berlin, Humboldt-Universita¨ t zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany Abstract Minor and major spliceosomes control splicing of distinct intron types and are thought to act largely independent of one another. SR proteins are essential splicing regulators mostly connected to the major spliceosome. Here, we show that Srsf10 expression is controlled through an autoregulated minor intron, tightly correlating Srsf10 with minor spliceosome abundance across different tissues and differentiation stages in mammals. Surprisingly, all other SR proteins also correlate with the minor spliceosome and Srsf10, and abolishing Srsf10 autoregulation by Crispr/ Cas9-mediated deletion of the autoregulatory exon induces expression of all SR proteins in a human cell line. Our data thus reveal extensive crosstalk and a global impact of the minor spliceosome on major intron splicing. *For correspondence: [email protected] (MP); [email protected] (FH) Introduction Present address: †Omiqa Alternative splicing (AS) is a major mechanism that controls gene expression (GE) and expands the Corporation, c/o Freie proteome diversity generated from a limited number of primary transcripts (Nilsen and Graveley, Universita¨ t Berlin, Altensteinstraße, Germany 2010). Splicing is carried out by a multi-megadalton molecular machinery called the spliceosome of which two distinct complexes exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Snorna Guide Activities – Real and Ambiguous Svetlana Deryusheva, Gaëlle JS Talross
    Downloaded from rnajournal.cshlp.org on September 29, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Deryusheva, Talross and Gall SnoRNA guide activities – real and ambiguous Svetlana Deryusheva, Gaëlle J.S. Talross 1, Joseph G. Gall Department of Embryology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA 1 Present address: Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06510, USA Corresponding authors: e-mail [email protected] [email protected] Running title: Testing snoRNA activities Keywords: modification guide RNA activity, 2’-O-methylation, pseudouridylation, Pus7p, snoRNA 1 Downloaded from rnajournal.cshlp.org on September 29, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Deryusheva, Talross and Gall ABSTRACT In eukaryotes, rRNAs and spliceosomal snRNAs are heavily modified posttranscriptionally. Pseudouridylation and 2’-O-methylation are the most abundant types of RNA modifications. They are mediated by modification guide RNAs, also known as small nucleolar (sno)RNAs and small Cajal body-specific (sca)RNAs. We used yeast and vertebrate cells to test guide activities predicted for a number of snoRNAs, based on their regions of complementarity with rRNAs. We showed that human SNORA24 is a genuine guide RNA for 18S-Ψ609, despite some non- canonical base-pairing with its target. At the same time, we found quite a few snoRNAs that have the ability to base-pair with rRNAs and can induce predicted modifications in artificial substrate RNAs, but do not modify the same target sequence within endogenous rRNA molecules. Furthermore, certain fragments of rRNAs can be modified by the endogenous yeast modification machinery when inserted into an artificial backbone RNA, even though the same sequences are not modified in endogenous yeast rRNAs.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide Rnas with 5 Caps and Novel Box C/D Snorna-Like Domains For
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Current Biology, Vol. 14, 1985–1995, November 23, 2004, 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.003 Guide RNAs with 5؅ Caps and Novel Box C/D snoRNA-like Domains for Modification of snRNAs in Metazoa Kazimierz T. Tycowski, Alar Aab, duced by small nucleolar RNP particles (snoRNPs). Box and Joan A. Steitz* C/D snoRNPs direct 2Ј-O-methylation, while box H/ACA Department of Molecular Biophysics particles are involved in pseudouridylation (reviewed in and Biochemistry [4]). The RNA components of the snoRNPs select the Howard Hughes Medical Institute sites for modification by engaging in extensive base Yale University School of Medicine pairing interactions with the substrate RNA, while meth- 295 Congress Avenue ylation and pseudouridylation are believed to be carried New Haven, Connecticut 06536 out by a snoRNP core protein specific to each particle class. Box C/D snoRNPs are composed of a small RNA mole- Summary cule, typically 70–90 nt long in vertebrates, and a set of at least four proteins: fibrillarin, which is the methyltrans- Background: Spliceosomal snRNAs and ribosomal ferase [5, 6], Nop56, Nop58, and 15.5 kDa (reviewed RNAs in metazoans contain numerous modified resi- in [4]). All box C/D snoRNAs contain four conserved Ј dues that are functionally important. The most common sequence elements: boxes C and D close to the 5 and Ј modifications are site-specific 2Ј-O-methylation and 3 termini, respectively, and internal copies of each box Ј Ј pseudouridylation, both directed by small ribonucleo- referred to as C and D .
    [Show full text]
  • RNA Promotes the Formation of Spatial Compartments in the Nucleus
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.25.267435; this version posted August 25, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. RNA promotes the formation of spatial compartments in the nucleus 1 1,2,5 1,5 1,5 Sofia A. Quinodoz , Prashant Bhat , Noah Ollikainen , Joanna W. Jachowicz , Abhik K. Banerjee1,3, Peter Chovanec1, Mario R. Blanco1, Amy Chow1, Yolanda Markaki4, Kathrin Plath4, and Mitchell Guttman1* (1) Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA (2) David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA (3) Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA (4) Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA (5) These authors contributed equally to this work. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. [email protected] (MG) bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.25.267435; this version posted August 25, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 SUMMARY 2 The nucleus is a highly organized arrangement of RNA, DNA, and protein molecules that are 3 compartmentalized within three-dimensional (3D) structures involved in shared functional and regulatory 4 processes. Although RNA has long been proposed to play a global role in organizing nuclear structure, 5 exploring the role of RNA in shaping nuclear structure has remained a challenge because no existing 6 methods can simultaneously measure RNA-RNA, RNA-DNA, and DNA-DNA contacts within 3D 7 structures.
    [Show full text]
  • A Minimal SMN Complex Facilitates Formation of Usnrnps in Drosophila Melanogaster
    Evolution of an RNP assembly system: A minimal SMN complex facilitates formation of UsnRNPs in Drosophila melanogaster Matthias Kroiss*, Jo¨ rg Schultz†, Julia Wiesner‡, Ashwin Chari*, Albert Sickmann‡, and Utz Fischer*§ Departments of *Biochemistry and †Bioinformatics, Theodor Boveri Institute, Biocenter, Am Hubland, 97074 Wu¨rzburg, Germany; and ‡Functional Genomics Group, Rudolf Virchow Center, Versbacher Strasse 9, 97078 Wu¨rzburg, Germany Edited by Kay E. Davies, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, and accepted by the Editorial Board April 25, 2008 (received for review March 8, 2008) In vertebrates, assembly of spliceosomal uridine-rich small nuclear The SMN complex not only functions in the assembly of the ribonucleoproteins (UsnRNPs) is mediated by the SMN complex, a Sm core domain, but also influences additional steps in the macromolecular entity composed of the proteins SMN and Gemins biogenesis pathway of UsnRNPs. One such step is the nuclear 2–8. Here we have studied the evolution of this machinery using import of the assembled UsnRNP, which is mediated by the complete genome assemblies of multiple model organisms. The SMN complex (or parts thereof) in conjunction with the import SMN complex has gained complexity in evolution by a blockwise factor importin ␤ (9). In addition, specific UsnRNP proteins addition of Gemins onto an ancestral core complex composed of and the cap hypermethylase Tgs1 have been found in associa- SMN and Gemin2. In contrast to this overall evolutionary trend to tion of the SMN complex (10). This observation indicates that more complexity in metazoans, orthologs of most Gemins are the SMN complex coordinates various events during UsnRNP missing in dipterans.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of the RNA Exosome in Insect Cells
    Characterization of the RNA Exosome in Insect Cells Role in mRNA Surveillance Viktoria Hessle Doctoral Thesis Stockholm, 2011 Department of Molecular Biology and Functional Genomics Stockholm University, Sweden The cover picture shows an immunolabeling experiment with an antibody against the core exosome protein Rrp4 in a salivary gland cell of Chironomus tentans. Viktoria Hessle, 2011 ISBN 978-91-7447-208-0 Printed in Sweden by Universitetsservice US-AB Stockholm 2011 Distributor: Stockholm University Library 1 To my family 2 Table of Contents ABSTRACT ..............................................................................................................................4 LIST OF ARTICLES INCLUDED IN THIS THESIS ......................................................... 5 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS.................................................................................................. 6 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................... 7 NUCLEAR ORGANIZATION IN EUKARYOTIC CELLS............................................... 7 The nuclear envelope, chromatin and the nucleolus ......................................................... 7 Subnuclear compartments ...............................................................................................10 EXPRESSION OF PROTEIN-CODING GENES IN EUKARYOTIC CELLS .............. 15 Co-transcriptional mRNA processing ............................................................................. 16 Coupling
    [Show full text]
  • Spliceosomal Usnrnp Biogenesis, Structure and Function Cindy L Will* and Reinhard Lührmann†
    290 Spliceosomal UsnRNP biogenesis, structure and function Cindy L Will* and Reinhard Lührmann† Significant advances have been made in elucidating the for each of the two reaction steps. Components of the biogenesis pathway and three-dimensional structure of the UsnRNPs also appear to catalyze the two transesterifi- UsnRNPs, the building blocks of the spliceosome. U2 and cation reactions leading to excision of the intron and U4/U6•U5 tri-snRNPs functionally associate with the pre-mRNA ligation of the 5′ and 3′ exons. Here we describe recent at an earlier stage of spliceosome assembly than previously advances in our understanding of snRNP biogenesis, thought, and additional evidence supporting UsnRNA-mediated structure and function, focusing primarily on the major catalysis of pre-mRNA splicing has been presented. spliceosomal UsnRNPs from higher eukaryotes. Addresses Identification of a novel UsnRNA export factor Max Planck Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, Department of Cellular UsnRNP biogenesis is a complex process, many aspects of Biochemistry, Am Fassberg 11, 37077 Göttingen, Germany. which remain poorly understood. Although less is known *e-mail: [email protected] about the maturation process of the minor U11, U12 and †e-mail: [email protected] U4atac UsnRNPs, it is assumed that they follow a pathway Current Opinion in Cell Biology 2001, 13:290–301 similar to that described below for the major UsnRNPs 0955-0674/01/$ — see front matter (see Figure 1). The UsnRNAs, with the exception of U6 © 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. and U6atac (see below), are transcribed by RNA polymerase II as snRNA precursors that contain additional Abbreviations ′ CBC cap-binding complex 3 nucleotides and acquire a monomethylated, m7GpppG NLS nuclear localization signal (m7G) cap structure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Histone Modifications in the Regulation of Alternative Splicing During Epithelial-To-Mesenchymal Transition Alexandre Segelle
    The role of histone modifications in the regulation of alternative splicing during epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition Alexandre Segelle To cite this version: Alexandre Segelle. The role of histone modifications in the regulation of alternative splicing during epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Agricultural sciences. Université Montpellier, 2020. English. NNT : 2020MONTT017. tel-03137009 HAL Id: tel-03137009 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03137009 Submitted on 10 Feb 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THÈSE POUR OBTENIR LE GRADE DE DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE M ONTPELLIER En Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire École doctorale Sciences Chimiques et Biologiques pour la Santé (ED CBS2 168) Unité de recherche UMR9002 CNRS-UM – Institut de Génétique Humaine (IGH) The role of histone modifications in the regulation of alternative splicing during the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition Présentée par Alexandre Segelle Le 28 Septembre 2020 Sous la direction de Reini Fernandez de Luco Devant le jury composé de Anne-Marie MARTINEZ,
    [Show full text]
  • Trp53 Ablation Fails to Prevent Microcephaly in Mouse Pallium with Impaired Minor Intron Splicing
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.05.434172; this version posted March 6, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Trp53 ablation fails to prevent microcephaly in mouse pallium with impaired minor intron splicing Running title: Cell cycle defects drive the microcephaly caused by minor splicing disruption. Alisa K. White1#, Marybeth Baumgartner2#, Madisen F. Lee1, Kyle D. Drake1, Gabriela S. Aquino1, Rahul N. Kanadia1,3,* 1Physiology and Neurobiology Department, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA 2Department of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510 3Institute of Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA #Authors contributed equally *Corresponding author Correspondence to Dr. Rahul N. Kanadia can be sent by mail, to 75 N Eagleville Rd, Storrs, CT 06269; by phone, at (860)-486-0286; or by e-mail, at [email protected]. Keywords. Cortical development; microcephaly; cell cycle; minor spliceosome; U11 snRNA bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.05.434172; this version posted March 6, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract. Mutations in minor spliceosome component RNU4ATAC, a small nuclear RNA (snRNA), are linked to primary microcephaly. We have reported that in the conditional knockout (cKO) mice for Rnu11, another minor spliceosome snRNA, minor intron splicing defect in minor intron-containing genes (MIGs) regulating cell cycle resulted in cell cycle defects, with a concomitant increase in γH2aX+ cells and p53-mediated apoptosis.
    [Show full text]