DOCSLIB.ORG

Neo-Latin Commentaries and the Management of Knowledge in the Late Middle Ages and the Early Modern Period (1400-1700)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Neo-Latin Commentaries and the Management of Knowledge in the Late Middle Ages and the Early Modern Period (1400-1700) SUPPLEMENTA HUMANISTICA LOVANIENSIA XXXIII NEO-LATIN COMMENTARIES AND THE MANAGEMENT OF KNOWLEDGE IN THE LATE MIDDLE AGES AND THE EARLY MODERN PERIOD (1400-1700) Edited by Karl ENENKEL & Henk NELLEN LEUVEN UNIVERSITY PRESS 2013 Reprint from Neo-Latin Commentaries and the Management of Knowledge (1400-1700) - ISBN 978 90 5867 936 9 - © Leuven University Press, 2013 96085_Enenkel&Nellen_vw.indd III 3/07/13 16:37 © 2013 Leuven University Press / Universitaire Pers Leuven / Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Minderbroedersstraat 4, B-3000 Leuven (Belgium). All rights reserved. Except in those cases expressly determined by law, no part of this publication may be multiplied, saved in an automated datafile or made public in any way whatsoever without the express prior written consent of the publishers. ISBN 978 90 5867 936 9 D/2013/1869/5 NUR: 694 Reprint from Neo-Latin Commentaries and the Management of Knowledge (1400-1700) - ISBN 978 90 5867 936 9 - © Leuven University Press, 2013 96085_Enenkel&Nellen_vw.indd IV 3/07/13 16:37 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ...................................................................... IX ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................ XIII INTRODUCTION. NEO-LATIN COMMENTARIES AND THE MANAGEMENT OF KNOWLEDGE 1. The Neo-Latin Commentary (1400-1700): A Forgotten and Misunderstood Genre ................................................................ 1 2. The Increased Importance of the Commentary and Other Para- texts in the Early Modern Period .............................................. 5 3. The Commentary as an Open Genre. The Early Modern Com- mentary’s Tendency toward Emancipation from the Source Text ............................................................................................ 8 4. The Kaleidoscopic Functions of the Early Modern Commentary 12 a. The Commentary as a Means of Authorization ................. 14 b. The Commentary as an Educational Tool at Schools and Universities ......................................................................... 17 c. Early Modern Commentaries as Encyclopedias of Learning 23 d. Commentaries and Textual Criticism ................................ 29 e. Commentaries and the Cultural History of Antiquity (Ars Antiquitatis) ........................................................................ 32 f. Political Commentary ........................................................ 33 g. Commentaries as Stimuli for Social Cohesion and as Polemical Platforms ........................................................... 35 h. Parafrasis as Literary Exercise ......................................... 37 i. Manuscript Annotations in Printed Books ........................ 38 5. The Layout of the Early Modern Commentary ........................ 39 6. Indexing ..................................................................................... 54 7. Related Genres: Variae Lectiones, Dictionarium (Dictionary) and Encyclopedia ...................................................................... 57 8. The Commentary in Historical Perspective .............................. 59 9. The Present Volume .................................................................. 70 Reprint from Neo-Latin Commentaries and the Management of Knowledge (1400-1700) - ISBN 978 90 5867 936 9 - © Leuven University Press, 2013 96085_Enenkel&Nellen_vw.indd V 3/07/13 16:37 VI CONTENTS I. HISTORICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL COLLECTIONS OF KNOWLEDGE Karl ENENKEL (Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster) Kommentare als multivalente Wissenssammlungen: Das ‘Fürsten- spiegel’-Kommentarwerk Antonio Beccadellis (De dictis et factis Alphonsi Regis Aragonum, 1455), Enea Silvio Piccolo- minis (1456) und Jakob Spiegels (1537) .................................. 79 Susanna DE BEER (Leiden University) The World Upside Down: The Geographical Revolution in Human- ist Commentaries on Pliny’s Natural History and Mela’s De situ orbis (1450-1700) ............................................................... 139 II. CLASSICAL POETRY Craig KALLENDORF (Texas A&M University, College Station) Virgil and the Ethical Commentary: Philosophy, Commonplaces, and the Structure of Renaissance Knowledge .......................... 201 Christoph PIEPER (Leiden University) Horatius praeceptor eloquentiae. The Ars Poetica in Cristoforo Landino’s Commentary ............................................................. 221 Marianne PADE (Aarhus University) Niccolò Perotti’s Cornu copiae: The Commentary as a Reposi- tory of Knowledge ..................................................................... 241 Valéry BERLINCOURT (Université de Genève) ‘Going beyond the Author’: Caspar von Barth’s Observations on the Art of Commentary-Writing and his Use of Exegetical Digressions .................................................................................... 263 III. DRAMA Jan BLOEMENDAL (Huygens Institute for the History of the Nether- lands, The Hague) In the Shadow of Donatus: Observations on Terence and Some of his Early Modern Commentators .............................................. 295 Reprint from Neo-Latin Commentaries and the Management of Knowledge (1400-1700) - ISBN 978 90 5867 936 9 - © Leuven University Press, 2013 96085_Enenkel&Nellen_vw.indd VI 3/07/13 16:37 CONTENTS VII Volkhard WELS (Berlin) Contempt for Commentators: Transformation of the Commentary Tradition in Daniel Heinsius’ Constitutio tragoediae .............. 325 IV. LAW Willem J. ZWALVE (Leiden University) Text & Commnentary: The Legal Middle Ages and the Roman Law Tradition: Justinian’s Const. Omnem and its Medieval Commentators ............................................................................ 349 Bernard H. STOLTE (University of Groningen) Text and Commentary: Legal Humanism........................................ 387 V. BIBLE Bernd ROLING (Freie Universität Berlin) Animalische Sprache und Intelligenz im Schriftkommentar: Bile- ams Esel in der Bibelkommentierung des Mittelalters und der Neuzeit ....................................................................................... 409 Henk NELLEN (Huygens Institute for the History of the Nether- lands, The Hague) Bible Commentaries as a Platform for Polemical Debate: Abraham Calovius versus Hugo Grotius .................................................. 445 Jetze TOUBER (Utrecht University) Philology and Theology: Commenting the Old Testament in the Dutch Republic, 1650-1700 ...................................................... 473 NOTES ON THE CONTRIBUTORS ........................................................... 511 INDEX ................................................................................................. 515 Reprint from Neo-Latin Commentaries and the Management of Knowledge (1400-1700) - ISBN 978 90 5867 936 9 - © Leuven University Press, 2013 96085_Enenkel&Nellen_vw.indd VII 3/07/13 16:37 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The present volume is part of the research programmes directed by Karl Enenkel, The New Management of Knowledge in the Early Modern Period: The Transmission of Classical Latin Literature via Neo-Latin Commentaries, and Henk Nellen (together with Piet Steenbakkers), Bib- lical Criticism and Secularization in the Seventeenth Century, both funded by the Dutch Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO). The editors of this volume are grateful to NWO for funding both the above- mentioned research programmes and the interdisciplinary conference Neo-Latin Commentaries and the Management of Knowledge in the Late Middle Ages and the Early Modern Period (1400-1700), which was organized by the editors and took place at the Royal Netherlands Acad- emy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), Trippenhuis, Amsterdam, 17-19 June 2010. The papers presented at this conference provided the initial impe- tus for the contributions that are now, in much revised form, published in the present volume. The conference organizers are grateful to the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences for its hospitality and support, and to NWO and to the Huygens Institute for their generous financial and organizational assistance. Pridie Kal. Mart. MMXII Karl Enenkel (Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster) Henk Nellen (Huygens Institute for the History of the Netherlands, The Hague) Reprint from Neo-Latin Commentaries and the Management of Knowledge (1400-1700) - ISBN 978 90 5867 936 9 - © Leuven University Press, 2013 96085_Enenkel&Nellen_vw.indd XIII 3/07/13 16:37 IN THE SHADOW OF DONATUS Observations on Terence and Some of his Early Modern Commentators Jan BLOEMENDAL Huygens Institute for the History of the Netherlands, The Hague Introduction In the late Middle Ages and the early modern period humanists rediscov- ered (as it were) Latin comedy written in the third and second centuries BC by Plautus and Terence.1 In the Middle Ages, Terence had been known and read as a prose author of dialogues, as can be seen in medi- eval manuscripts (fig. 21), but from 1500 onwards, humanists started to view his plays as dramatic poetry, and they had them performed in schools and universities. This had to do with the rediscovery in the first half of the fifteenth century of a manuscript of his plays with a commen- tary by the fourth-century Alexandrian grammarian Donatus.2 The humanists not only studied these plays themselves, they read them with their students in the classroom, and had them performed by the same students. This gave Terence a special position in education, and as a result of that position, numerous editions were published in the early
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: MAKING ENGLISH LOW: A
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: MAKING ENGLISH LOW: A HISTORY OF LAUREATE POETICS, 1399-1616 Christine Maffuccio, Doctor of Philosophy, 2018 Dissertation directed by: Professor Theresa Coletti Department of English My dissertation analyzes lowbrow literary forms, tropes, and modes in the writings of three would-be laureates, writers who otherwise sought to align themselves with cultural and political authorities and who themselves aspired to national prominence: Thomas Hoccleve (c. 1367-1426), John Skelton (c. 1460-1529), and Ben Jonson (1572-1637). In so doing, my project proposes a new approach to early English laureateship. Previous studies assume that aspiration English writers fashioned their new mantles exclusively from high learning, refined verse, and the moral virtues of elite poetry. In the writings and self-fashionings that I analyze, however, these would-be laureates employed literary low culture to insert themselves into a prestigious, international lineage; they did so even while creating personas that were uniquely English. Previous studies have also neglected the development of early laureateship and nationalist poetics across the fifteenth, sixteenth, and seventeenth centuries. Examining the ways that cultural cachet—once the sole property of the elite—became accessible to popular audiences, my project accounts for and depends on a long view. My first two chapters analyze writers whose idiosyncrasies have afforded them a marginal position in literary histories. In Chapter 1, I argue that Hoccleve channels Chaucer’s Host, Harry Bailly, in the Male Regle and the Series. Like Harry, Hoccleve draws upon quotidian London experiences to create a uniquely English writerly voice worthy of laureate status. In Chapter 2, I argue that Skelton enshrine the poet’s own fleeting historical experience in the Garlande of Laurell and Phyllyp Sparowe by employing contrasting prosodies to juxtapose the rhythms of tradition with his own demotic meter.
    [Show full text]
  • Studieren Im Rom Der Renaissance
    Forschungen 3 Michael Matheus ∙ Rainer Christoph Schwinges (Hrsg.) Die Arbeiten dieses Bandes sind den «Rom-Studien» von Personen aus dem römisch- deutschen Reich, aus Polen und Italien zur Zeit der Renaissance gewidmet. Ziel ist nicht zuletzt, den im Vergleich zu anderen italienischen Universitätsorten lange unter- schätzten Studienort Rom ins rechte Licht zu rücken. Ein grundlegender Beitrag zu Forschungswegen und Forschungsstand macht dazu den Auftakt. Um ihn herum sind Beiträge gruppiert, die sowohl die allgemeine Prosopographie als auch Studieren einzelne Persönlichkeiten im römischen Umfeld betreffen. So ndet man Beiträge über «Rom und Italien als Kriterien des sozialen Erfolgs» am Beispiel deutscher Gelehrter des 15. Jahr- hunderts, über den gelehrten Ritteradeligen Ulrich von Hutten und den späteren Kardinal im Rom Wilhelm von Enckenvoirt «im kosmopolitischen Rom», über die Frage, welche Rolle die päpst- lichen Hofpfalzgrafen beim Erwerb von Universitätsgraden «auf Schleichwegen in Rom» spiel- ten, über «Polnische Studenten im Rom der frühen Renaissance», über zwei Kollegien und ihre Kollegiaten im Rom des 15. und 16. Jahrhunderts (in italienischer Sprache: Lo studio dei der Renaissance collegiali), über die vornehmlich rhetorischen und humanistischen Studien, die selbst Bürger- söhne Roms am heimischen Universitätsort betrieben (in italienischer Sprache: Letture e studi dei cittadini romani), sowie über «Gelehrtennetzwerke zur Zeit der Renaissance am Beispiel | downloaded: 2.10.2021 von Johannes Regiomontanus» am römischen Studienort. Die Beiträge zeigen gesamthaft auf, dass auch die «Rom-Studien» wichtige Bestandteile der universitären Sozial- und Kultur- geschichte Europas sind. Repertorium Academicum Germanicum (RAG) Repertorium Academicum Germanicum (RAG) Forschungen 3 https://doi.org/10.48350/151567 ISBN 978-3-7281-3994-8 (open access) DOI 10.3218/3994-8 source: [email protected] www.vdf.ethz.ch Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich Liebe Leserin, lieber Leser Wir freuen uns, dass Sie unsere Open-Access-Publikation heruntergeladen haben.
    [Show full text]
  • MCMANUS-DISSERTATION-2016.Pdf (4.095Mb)
    The Global Lettered City: Humanism and Empire in Colonial Latin America and the Early Modern World The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation McManus, Stuart Michael. 2016. The Global Lettered City: Humanism and Empire in Colonial Latin America and the Early Modern World. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33493519 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA The Global Lettered City: Humanism and Empire in Colonial Latin America and the Early Modern World A dissertation presented by Stuart Michael McManus to The Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts April 2016 © 2016 – Stuart Michael McManus All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisors: James Hankins, Tamar Herzog Stuart Michael McManus The Global Lettered City: Humanism and Empire in Colonial Latin America and the Early Modern World Abstract Historians have long recognized the symbiotic relationship between learned culture, urban life and Iberian expansion in the creation of “Latin” America out of the ruins of pre-Columbian polities, a process described most famously by Ángel Rama in his account of the “lettered city” (ciudad letrada). This dissertation argues that this was part of a larger global process in Latin America, Iberian Asia, Spanish North Africa, British North America and Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Università Degli Studi Di Salerno
    UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI SALERNO FACOLTÀ DI LETTERE E FILOSOFIA DIPARTIMENTO DI STUDI UMANISTICI DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN FILOLOGIA CLASSICA X CICLO TESI DI DOTTORATO Le annotazioni di Pomponio Leto a Lucano (Vat. lat. 3285): libri I-IV con un’appendice sulla Vita Lucani DOTTORANDA: Elettra Camperlingo tutor: coordinatore del dottorato: Prof. Paolo Esposito Prof. Paolo Esposito co-tutor: Prof. ssa Christine Walde ANNO ACCADEMICO 2010/2011 Ai miei maestri di vita e di scuola Sommario INTRODUZIONE I CAPITOLO I : Pomponio Leto I.1- Quasi una biografia 2 I.1.1. Fonti per una biografia di Pomponio Leto 2 I.1.2. La questione del nome 4 I.1.3. Data e luogo di nascita 6 I.1.4. La famiglia di Pomponio Leto 7 I.1.5. Gli anni giovanili 9 I.1.6. Il primo soggiorno a Roma: la scuola di Lorenzo Valla e di 10 Pietro Odo da Montopoli I.1.7. L’incarico d’insegnamento nello Studium Vrbis e il soggiorno a 13 Venezia I.1.8. Le accuse 15 I.1.9. La congiura, l’imprigionamento e il processo 16 I.1.10. Il ritorno all’insegnamento 19 I.1.11. L’esperienza dei viaggi 19 I.1.12.Gli anni di insegnamento presso lo Studium Vrbis 21 I.1.13. Il “ritratto” di Pomponio Leto 23 I.1.14. Morte di Pomponio Leto 25 I.2- Opere 26 I.2.1. La testimonianza delle fonti biografiche 26 I.2.2. Per una classificazione tipologica delle opere di Leto 26 I.2.3. Opere di Pomponio Leto trasmesse in manoscritti 27 I.2.3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Sherburne (18 September 1616 - 4 November 1702) Katherine Quinsey University of Windsor
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Scholarship at UWindsor University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor English Publications Department of English 1993 Edward Sherburne (18 September 1616 - 4 November 1702) Katherine Quinsey University of Windsor Follow this and additional works at: http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/englishpub Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Quinsey, Katherine. (1993). Edward Sherburne (18 September 1616 - 4 November 1702). Dictionary of Literary Biography, Vol. 131: Seventeenth-Century British Nondramatic Poets, Third Series, 131, 245-257. http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/englishpub/29 This Contribution to Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of English at Scholarship at UWindsor. It has been accepted for inclusion in English Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship at UWindsor. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Title: Edward Sherburne Known As: Sherburne, Edward; Sherburne, Edward, Sir British Poet ( 1616 - 1702 ) Author(s): Katherine M. Quinsey (University of Windsor) Source: Seventeenth-Century British Nondramatic Poets: Third Series. Ed. M. Thomas Hester. Dictionary of Literary Biography Vol. 131. Detroit: Gale Research, 1993. From Literature Resource Center. Document Type: Biography, Critical essay Full Text: COPYRIGHT 1993 Gale Research, COPYRIGHT 2007 Gale, Cengage Learning Table of Contents:Biographical and Critical EssaySeneca's Answer to Lucilius his Quare; Why Good Men suffer Misfortunes seeing there is a Divine Providence?MedeaThe Sphere of Marcus ManiliusTroades, or, The Royal CaptivesWritings by the AuthorFurther Readings about the Author WORKS: WRITINGS BY THE AUTHOR: Books Medea: a Tragedie. Written in Latine by Lucius Annévs Seneca.
    [Show full text]
  • Studieren Im Rom Der Renaissance
    Forschungen 3 Michael Matheus ∙ Rainer Christoph Schwinges (Hrsg.) Die Arbeiten dieses Bandes sind den «Rom-Studien» von Personen aus dem römisch- deutschen Reich, aus Polen und Italien zur Zeit der Renaissance gewidmet. Ziel ist nicht zuletzt, den im Vergleich zu anderen italienischen Universitätsorten lange unter- schätzten Studienort Rom ins rechte Licht zu rücken. Ein grundlegender Beitrag zu Forschungswegen und Forschungsstand macht dazu den Auftakt. Um ihn herum sind Beiträge gruppiert, die sowohl die allgemeine Prosopographie als auch Studieren einzelne Persönlichkeiten im römischen Umfeld betreffen. So ndet man Beiträge über «Rom und Italien als Kriterien des sozialen Erfolgs» am Beispiel deutscher Gelehrter des 15. Jahr- hunderts, über den gelehrten Ritteradeligen Ulrich von Hutten und den späteren Kardinal im Rom Wilhelm von Enckenvoirt «im kosmopolitischen Rom», über die Frage, welche Rolle die päpst- lichen Hofpfalzgrafen beim Erwerb von Universitätsgraden «auf Schleichwegen in Rom» spiel- ten, über «Polnische Studenten im Rom der frühen Renaissance», über zwei Kollegien und ihre Kollegiaten im Rom des 15. und 16. Jahrhunderts (in italienischer Sprache: Lo studio dei der Renaissance collegiali), über die vornehmlich rhetorischen und humanistischen Studien, die selbst Bürger- söhne Roms am heimischen Universitätsort betrieben (in italienischer Sprache: Letture e studi dei cittadini romani), sowie über «Gelehrtennetzwerke zur Zeit der Renaissance am Beispiel von Johannes Regiomontanus» am römischen Studienort. Die Beiträge zeigen
    [Show full text]
  • Justus Lipsius and Cicero's Paradoxa Stoicorum
    THE FIRST CHRISTIAN DEFENDER OF STOIC VIRTUE? JUSTUS LIPSIUS AND CICERO’S PARADOXA STOICORUM Jan Papy* Know then this truth (enough for Man to know) “Virtue alone is happiness below”. Alexander Pope, Essay on Man, 4.309-310. CICERO’S PARADOXA STOICORUM: A CONTENTIOUS ISSUE If Sabbadini was right to label Erasmus’s Ciceronianus, published in 1528, “a decisive work with respect to the long controversy over the imitation of Cicero as a writer and stylist”, Erasmus’s famous dialogue was, so it appeared, as deci- sive for a new sort of criticism addressed to the “philosopher Cicero”.1 For whereas Celio Calcagnini (Ferrara, 1479 - Ferrara, 1541), then professor at the University of Ferrara, called into question 25 places of Cicero’s De officiis in his Disquisitiones aliquot in libros officiorum Ciceronis of 1538,2 Marcanto- nius Majoragius (Ferrara, 1514 - Ferrara, 1555) published an open attack against Cicero as philosopher eight years later. His lively Christian Platonist dialogue, which purports to have been held in the suburbs of Milan in the gar- den of the Fannianus family – thus subtly echoing the setting of Cicero’s Tus- culanae disputationes – was entitled Antiparadoxon because of the fact that Majoragius had attacked Cicero’s Paradoxa Stoicorum as invalid on two counts: they were not Socratic (in the way the Florentine Platonists Giovanni Pico della Mirandola and Agostino Steuco understood “Socratic”), and they were not true since Cicero’s method of argument and argumentation was false, ignorant and unskilful.3 Once again Majoragius, stating that a rhetorician is not * Research for this article was facilitated by a “Joint Activities Grant” awarded by The British Academy (2001-2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Biondo Flavio and Leandro Alberti
    Chorography as Culture: Biondo Flavio and Leandro Alberti JEFFREY A. WHITE 1. Introduction The Bolognese Dominican, Leandro Alberti’s (1479-1552) Descrittione di tutta Italia was first printed in 1550, about a hundred years after the first publication, in MS format, of Biondo Flavio’s Italia Illustrata1. That is to say, it was written and released into a different world from Biondo’s, one being transformed by printed books2, by a propagating convulsion of Christianity that incentivized manifold scholarship, by the reclamation of a hemisphere, and, with exploration, by the re-conceiving of the nature of travel and distance and time – among other epochal developments. Bolo- ___________ 1 The editio princeps of the Descrittione: Bologna, Anselmo Giaccarelli 1550 (Alberti 1550). And it seems that the travels Alberti put to the literary purposes of the work and the execution of most of it were completed by 1532 (see below). For Alberti, see Redigonda 1960. For Biondo, see (the still definitive) Fubini 1968. (The passing of Professor Riccardo Fubini [† 9 August 2018] was marked, e.g., in «RSA Renaissance News», definitively also, by William J. Connell: https://www.rsa.org/blogpost/856879/307618/Riccardo-Fubini.) 2 As Gaspare Biondo says (to a friend of his father) on the production of the 1474 editio princeps of the Italia Illustrata (see White 2016, 209 and 210): Coegerunt me tandem assiduae tuae voces, praestantissime Pater, ut Italiam illus- tratam, Blondi Flavii Forliviensis, genitoris mei, amici quondam tui tuarum laudum et gloriae studiosissimi opus, per librorum impressores in multa volumina scribi cu- rarem, cum diutius negare non possem tibi, quotidiano convicio negligentiam meam accusanti quod (nactus praebitam nostro saeculo multiplicandorum per impressores librorum occasionem) non providerem in posterum gloriae patris mei, et pariter cum possem satisfacere, negligerem..
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Passages Discussed
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-11742-5 - Jonson, Horace and the Classical Tradition Victoria Moul Index More information Index of passages discussed Specific portions of longer poems are indexed separately only where there is a substantial discussion of the lines in question. Gunn, Thom, ‘An Invitation’ 213–15 Odes I.1 10–11, 13, 20, 23, 42, 137, 157, 199 Holland, Hugh, Pancharis 41–2 I.1.35–6 34, 187, 204 Horace I.2 170 Ars Poetica 88–9, 90, 101, 102, 166, 174, I.12 25–7 175–92, 199 I.14 201–2 38–45 185–8 I.17 204 58–60 216 1.25 118 58–72 188–92 I.26 1, 173, 199 330–4 184–5 I.37 169 338–46 182–3 II.5 171 408–10 31 II.14 193 419–25 180–1 II.17 157 426–8 85–6, 181 II.18 122 434–7 178–80 II.20 42, 45, 169, 205 Carmen Saeculare 168 III.3 117, 170 Epistles III.13 14 I.1 85 III.15 118 I.2 72–3, 74 III.17 27 I.3 34, 166 III.19 27 I.5 10, 57–62 III.21 166 I.7 85, 112 III.30 10–11, 13, 19, 20, 23, 34, 42, 185 I.11 10, 75–7, 116 IV.1 10, 206–10 I.18 10, 11, 72, 78–80, 90–2, 185, 194–8, 203 IV.2 14, 34, 44–5, 47, 170 I.18.67–8 91–2 IV.3 35, 141 I.18.76–81 91–2 IV.4 14, 169 I.19 100, 112, 137, 185, 205 IV.5 14, 169 I.19.21–5 99 IV.6 169 I.19.23–5 102–3 IV.8 10–11, 13, 14–24, 185, 193 I.19.30–1 102–3 IV.8.1–12 15–16 II.1 102, 103, 104, 133, 166 IV.8.22–29 16–17 II.1.266–70 59, 70, 103–4 IV.9 10–11, 13, 14–24, 72, 185 II.2.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/148043 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2017-12-05 and may be subject to change. Christoph & Andreas Arnold r and - England The travels and book-collections of two seventeenth-century Nurembergers F.J.M. Blom CHRISTOPH & ANDREAS ARNOLD AND ENGLAND Promotor: Prof. T.A.Birrell nsfopfl.iÀrncid. Trjr. L/rmrt. Nmi.tmil.itDtac.. ILr hiatus J Je . /ггг/. лез?. ^I/fTijfitf a. utf.isun ¿ces С if-mfe/. С sTittmm «- Jms Juhts amas csrittmrn . ял* ft.'ti ¿Mailt.· 'Ut/accs • •ir/. '///<-/·.· J-ltl From Bibliotheca Arnoldtana (1725) by courtesy of the Universitätsbibliothek Erlangen-Nürnberg. CHRISTOPH & ANDREAS ARNOLD AND ENGLAND THE TRAVELS AND BOOK-COLLECTIONS OF TWO SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY NUREMBERGERS Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor in de letteren aan de Katholieke Universiteit te Nijmegen, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus Prof. Dr. P.G.A.B. Wijdeveld volgens besluit van het College van Decanen in het openbaar te verdedigen op 16 juni 1981 des namiddags te 4 uur door FRANCISCUS JOANNES MARIA BLOM geboren te Nijmegen Sneldruk Boulevard Enschede С.1981 F.J.M. Blom, Instituut Engels-Amerikaans Katholieke Universiteit, Erasmusplein 1, Nijmegen ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank the authorities and staffs of the following li­ braries, institutions and archives for permission to examine printed books
    [Show full text]
  • MARCUS TULLIUS CICERO, De Officiis Libri III Cum Interpretatione Petri Marsi
    MARCUS TULLIUS CICERO, De officiis libri III cum interpretatione Petri Marsi [Cicero’s De officiis with commentary by PIETRO MARSO] In Latin, decorated manuscript on parchment France, likely Paris?, certainly after 1471-72, likely between 1481-1491 [II] + 149 ff., preceded and followed by 2 paper flyleaves, missing apparently 3 leaves, the first leaf of each of the three books (collation: a8 [lacking a8], b8 [lacking b7], c-i8, k8 [lacking k1], l-m8, n8+1 [quire misbound with correct text sequence as follows: ff. 97-98-99-96-103-100-101-102-104], o8 [lacking o5], p-s8, t8-1 [lacking t8, likely canceled blank]), contemporary alphabetical quire signatures, written in two sizes of a Humanistic minuscule still influenced by Gothic characteristics, both scripts very legible, in brown ink on up to 20 lines for main text (justification 70 x 105 mm), copious interlinear and marginal commentary, parchment ruled in light red, rubrics in red with some in blue, paragraph marks in alternating red or blue, some guide letters, numerous 1- to 3-line high initials in gold on cardinal red grounds with calligraphic decoration, some capitals touched in yellow, a few marginal annotations in darker brown ink added in the margins of the first leaves added in a later cursive hand (e.g. ff. 3-9). Bound in brown calf over pasteboard, covers with double frame of triple blind filets, with four gilt fleurons at outer angles of inner frame, gilt double lozenge lined with blind filets in the center of inner frame, with at center of lozenge the gilt crowned dolphin device (likely of François II, dauphin), rebacked c.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Erzähltechnik Des Silius Italicus
    Die Erzähltechnik des Silius Italicus Eine narratologisch-intertextuelle Analyse am Beispiel der Schlacht von Cannae (!,#$$–&',())) Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der Philosophischen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität zu Bonn vorgelegt von Nadine Siepe aus Warstein Bonn "#$% Verö(entlicht mit der Genehmigung der Philosophischen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn Zusammensetzung der Prüfungskommission: Prof. Dr. Konrad Vössing (Vorsitzender) Prof. Dr. Dorothee Gall (Betreuerin und Gutachterin) Prof. Dr. Marc Laureys (Gutachter) Prof. Dr. 4omas A. Schmitz (Weiteres prüfungsberechtigtes Mitglied) Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: $9. Juli "#$9 Meinen Eltern Vorwort Zu besonderem Dank bin ich Frau Professor Dr. Dorothee Gall, der Betreue- rin dieser Arbeit, verp<ichtet, die mich über die langen Jahre begleitet und unterstützt hat. Ebenfalls danken möchte ich dem Zweitgutachter Professor Dr. Marc Laureys sowie den Mitgliedern der Prüfungskommission, Professor Dr. 4omas A. Schmitz und Professor Dr. Konrad Vössing. Des Weiteren danke ich von Herzen für Unterstützung verschiedenster Art meinem Vater, meinen Geschwistern 4omas und Silke, Eva Uessem, Esther-Luisa Schuster, Verena Elias, 4omas Riesenweber, den Bonner Ober- seminaren, Fabio della Schiava, Roswitha Simons, Astrid Steiner-Weber, Rai- ner Johannes, Mi und Samson Siepe, dem Europaeum und Paul Flather, dem Flavian Epic Net, den Amici linguae Latinae, Michael Mrosek und Familie, Willy Knipschild, Elmar Hübner, Martin Frigger
    [Show full text]