Fishing in the Seward Area
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Baseline Water Quality Inventory for the Southwest Alaska Inventory and Monitoring Network, Kenai Fjords National Park
Baseline Water Quality Inventory for the Southwest Alaska Inventory and Monitoring Network, Kenai Fjords National Park Laurel A. Bennett National Park Service Southwest Alaska Inventory and Monitoring Network 240 W. 5th Avenue Anchorage, AK 99501 April 2005 Report Number: NPS/AKRSWAN/NRTR-2005/02 Funding Source: Southwest Alaska Network Inventory and Monitoring Program, National Park Service File Name: BennettL_2005_KEFJ_WQInventory_Final.doc Recommended Citation: Bennett, L. 2005. Baseline Water Quality Inventory for the Southwest Alaska Inventory and Monitoring Network, Kenai Fjords National Park. USDI National Park Service, Anchorage, AK Topic: Inventory Subtopic: Water Theme Keywords: Reports, inventory, freshwater, water quality, core parameters Placename Keywords: Alaska, Kenai Fjords National Park, Southwest Alaska Network, Aialik Bay, McCarty Fjord, Harrison Bay, Two Arm Bay, Northwestern Fjord, Nuka River, Delight Lake Kenai Fjords Water Quality Inventory - SWAN Abstract A reconnaissance level water quality inventory was conducted at Kenai Fjords National Park during May through July of 2004. This project was initiated as part of the National Park Service Vital Signs Inventory and Monitoring Program in an effort to collect water quality data in an area where little work had previously been done. The objectives were to collect baseline information on the physical and chemical characteristics of the water resources, and, where possible, relate basic water quality parameters to fish occurrence. Water temperatures in Kenai Fjords waters generally met the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) regulatory standards for both drinking water and growth and propagation of fish, shellfish, other aquatic life and wildlife. Water temperature standard are less than or equal to 13° C for spawning and egg and fry incubation, or less than or equal to 15° C for rearing and migration (DEC 2003). -
An Evaluation of the Trail Lakes Salmon Hatchery for Consistency with Statewide Policies and Prescribed Management Practices
Regional Information Report No. 5J12-21 An Evaluation of the Trail Lakes Salmon Hatchery for Consistency with Statewide Policies and Prescribed Management Practices by Mark Stopha October 2012 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Commercial Fisheries Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in the following reports by the Divisions of Sport Fish and of Commercial Fisheries: Fishery Manuscripts, Fishery Data Series Reports, Fishery Management Reports, Special Publications and the Division of Commercial Fisheries Regional Reports. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, as well as in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figure or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Mathematics, statistics centimeter cm Alaska Administrative all standard mathematical deciliter dL Code AAC signs, symbols and gram g all commonly accepted abbreviations hectare ha abbreviations e.g., Mr., Mrs., alternate hypothesis HA kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. base of natural logarithm e kilometer km all commonly accepted catch per unit effort CPUE liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., coefficient of variation CV meter m R.N., etc. common test statistics (F, t, 2, etc.) milliliter mL at @ confidence interval CI millimeter mm compass directions: correlation coefficient east E (multiple) R Weights and measures (English) north N correlation coefficient cubic feet per second ft3/s south S (simple) r foot ft west W covariance cov gallon gal copyright degree (angular ) ° inch in corporate suffixes: degrees of freedom df mile mi Company Co. -
Alaska OCS Socioeconomic Studies Program
Technical Report Number 36 Alaska OCS Socioeconomic Studies Program Sponsor: Bureau of Land Management Alaska Outer Northern Gulf of Alaska Petroleum Development Scenarios Sociocultural Impacts The United States Department of the Interior was designated by the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Lands Act of 1953 to carry out the majority of the Act’s provisions for administering the mineral leasing and develop- ment of offshore areas of the United States under federal jurisdiction. Within the Department, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has the responsibility to meet requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) as well as other legislation and regulations dealing with the effects of offshore development. In Alaska, unique cultural differences and climatic conditions create a need for developing addi- tional socioeconomic and environmental information to improve OCS deci- sion making at all governmental levels. In fulfillment of its federal responsibilities and with an awareness of these additional information needs, the BLM has initiated several investigative programs, one of which is the Alaska OCS Socioeconomic Studies Program (SESP). The Alaska OCS Socioeconomic Studies Program is a multi-year research effort which attempts to predict and evaluate the effects of Alaska OCS Petroleum Development upon the physical, social, and economic environ- ments within the state. The overall methodology is divided into three broad research components. The first component identifies an alterna- tive set of assumptions regarding the location, the nature, and the timing of future petroleum events and related activities. In this component, the program takes into account the particular needs of the petroleum industry and projects the human, technological, economic, and environmental offshore and onshore development requirements of the regional petroleum industry. -
Be Properly 'Armed' Before Doing 'Combat' on Upper Kenai
Refuge Notebook • Vol. 1, No. 14 • June 11, 1999 Be properly ‘armed’ before doing ‘combat’ on upper Kenai by Bill Kent The 15 miles of the Kenai River upstream from Ski- costs $5, which covers parking for one vehicle. lak Lake, known as the upper Kenai River, will open Boaters usually put in at the Kenai River Bridge for fishing today. Many people know this area pri- in Cooper Landing, just below Kenai Lake and at the marily for the “combat” fishing at the confluence of ferry. Jim’s Landing is the last takeout before the Ke- the Russian and Kenai Rivers and may not think about nai Canyon. If you pass Jim’s Landing, the next take this portion of the river the same way as the lower out is Upper Skilak Lake campground. Please note that reaches below Skilak Lake. However there are differ- Jim’s Landing is closed to fishing. ences and similarities you should keep in mind when The riverbanks of the Upper Kenai are just as frag- visiting this part of Kenai National Wildlife Refuge. ile as the banks below Skilak Lake. Riverbank fishing Everyone fishing the Upper Kenai should review closures are scattered along the river from the bride at the state fishing regulations carefully. There are re- Kenai Lake to Jim’s Landing. These areas are posted strictions on harvest limits, types of gear, and area clo- “Closed” with Fish and Game or refuge signs and are sures which are unique to this area. described in the fishing regulations. For instance, no rainbow trout may be harvested The thousands of visitors who use the upper Kenai there, in keeping with the management strategy de- can generate a great deal of litter and trash. -
Chugach National Forest Wilderness Area Inventory and Evaluation
Chugach National Forest Wilderness Area Inventory and Evaluation Overview of the Wilderness Area Recommendation Process As part of plan revision, the responsible official, the forest supervisor, shall “identify and evaluate lands that may be suitable for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System and determine whether to recommend any such lands for wilderness designation” (36 CFR 219.7(c)(2)(v), effective May 9, 2012). Forest Service directives (FSH 1909.12, Chapter 70) for implementing the 2012 Planning Rule provide further guidance on how to complete this process in four steps: (1) Identify and inventory all lands that may be suitable for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System (2) Evaluate the wilderness characteristics of each area based on a given set of criteria (3) The forest supervisor will determine which areas to further analyze in the NEPA process (4) The forest supervisor will decide which areas, if any, to recommend for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System This report provides documentation for the inventory and evaluation steps of this process, and is divided into two sections. The first section provides information about the inventory process and results. These results also include a description of the current conditions and management for vegetation, wildlife, fish, recreation, and access to the Chugach National Forest as they are related to wilderness character. This description is intended to provide a big-picture view of national forest resources and serve as a foundation for the evaluation section. The second section provides an area by area evaluation of wilderness characteristics found in the inventoried lands. -
Seward Historic Preservation Plan
City of Seward City Council Louis Bencardino - Mayor Margaret Anderson Marianna Keil David Crane Jerry King Darrell Deeter Bruce Siemenski Ronald A. Garzini, City Manager Seward Historic Preservation Commissioners Doug Capra Donna Kowalski Virginia Darling Faye Mulholland Jeanne Galvano Dan Seavey Glenn Hart Shannon Skibeness Mike Wiley Project Historian - Anne Castellina Community Development Department Kerry Martin, Director Rachel James - Planning Assistant Contracted assistance by: Margaret Branson Tim Sczawinski Madelyn Walker Funded by: The City of Seward and the Alaska Office of History and Archaeology Recommended by: Seward Historic Preservation Commission Resolution 96-02 Seward Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution 96-11 Adopted by: Seward City Council Resolution 96-133 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction......................................................................................................................................1 Purpose of the Plan ..............................................................................................................1 Method .................................................................................................................................2 Goals for Historic Preservation............................................................................................3 Community History and Character ..................................................................................................4 Community Resources...................................................................................................................20 -
Code of Colorado Regulations 1 H
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Wildlife CHAPTER W-1 - FISHING 2 CCR 406-1 [Editor’s Notes follow the text of the rules at the end of this CCR Document.] _________________________________________________________________________ ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS #100 – DEFINITIONS See also 33-1-102, C.R.S and Chapter 0 of these regulations for other applicable definitions. A. "Artificial flies and lures" means devices made entirely of, or a combination of, natural or synthetic non-edible, non-scented (regardless if the scent is added in the manufacturing process or applied afterward), materials such as wood, plastic, silicone, rubber, epoxy, glass, hair, metal, feathers, or fiber, designed to attract fish. This definition does not include anything defined as bait in #100.B below. B. "Bait" means any hand-moldable material designed to attract fish by the sense of taste or smell; those devices to which scents or smell attractants have been added or externally applied (regardless if the scent is added in the manufacturing process or applied afterward); scented manufactured fish eggs and traditional organic baits, including but not limited to worms, grubs, crickets, leeches, dough baits or stink baits, insects, crayfish, human food, fish, fish parts or fis h eggs. C. "Chumming" means placing fish, parts of fish, or other material upon which fish might feed in the waters of this state for the purpose of attracting fish to a particular area in order that they might be taken, but such term shall not include fishing with baited hooks or live traps. D. “Game fish” means all species of fish except unregulated species, prohibited nongame, endangered and threatened species, which currently exist or may be introduced into the state and which are classified as game fish by the Commission. -
Chugach National Forest 2016 Visitor Guide
CHUGACH NATIONAL FOREST 2016 VISITOR GUIDE CAMPING WILDILFE VISITOR CENTERS page 10 page 12 page 15 Welcome Get Out and Explore! Hop on a train for a drive-free option into the Chugach National Forest, plan a multiple day trip to access remote to the Chugach National Forest! primitive campsites, attend the famous Cordova Shorebird Festival, or visit the world-class interactive exhibits Table of Contents at Begich, Boggs Visitor Center. There is something for everyone on the Chugach. From the Kenai Peninsula to The Chugach National Forest, one of two national forests in Alaska, serves as Prince William Sound, to the eastern shores of the Copper River Delta, the forest is full of special places. Overview ....................................3 the “backyard” for over half of Alaska’s residents and is a destination for visi- tors. The lands that now make up the Chugach National Forest are home to the People come from all over the world to experience the Chugach National Forest and Alaska’s wilderness. Not Eastern Kenai Peninsula .......5 Alaska Native peoples including the Ahtna, Chugach, Dena’ina, and Eyak. The only do we welcome international visitors, but residents from across the state travel to recreate on Chugach forest’s 5.4 million acres compares in size with the state of New Hampshire and National Forest lands. Whether you have an hour or several days there are options galore for exploring. We have Prince William Sound .............7 comprises a landscape that includes portions of the Kenai Peninsula, Prince Wil- listed just a few here to get you started. liam Sound, and the Copper River Delta. -
Recall Retail List 030-2020
United States Food Safety Department of and Inspection Agriculture Service RETAIL CONSIGNEES FOR FSIS RECALL 030-2020 FSIS has reason to believe that the following retail location(s) received LEAN CUISINE Baked Chicken meal products that have been recalled by Nestlé Prepared Foods. This list may not include all retail locations that have received the recalled productor may include retail locations that did not actually receive the recalled product. Therefore, it is important that you use the product-specific identification information, available at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public- health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2020/recall-030-2020-release, in addition to this list of retail stores, to check meat or poultry products in your possession to see if they have been recalled. Store list begins on next page United States Food Safety USDA Department of And Inspection - Agl'iculture Service Retail List for Recall Number: 030-2020 chicken meal product List Current As Of: 26-Jan-21 Nationwide, State-Wide, or Area-Wide Distribution Retailer Name Location 1 Albertsons AZ, CA, LA, NV, OR, TX, WA 2 Bashas AZ 3 Big Y CT 4 City Market CO 5 Dillons KS 6 Food Lion GA, SC, TN, VA 7 Fred Meyer OR, WA 8 Fry's Food And Drug AZ 9 Fry's Marketplace AZ 10 Gelson's Market CA 11 Giant MD, PA, VA 12 Giant Eagle Supermarket OH, PA 13 Heinen's OH 14 Hy-Vee IL, IA, KS, MN, MO, NE, SD 15 Ingles Markets GA, NC, SC, TN 16 Jay C IN 17 JewelOsco IL 18 King Soopers CO AR, GA, IL, IN, KY, MI, MS, OH, SC, TN, TX, VA, 19 Kroger WV 20 Lowes NC 21 Marianos IL 22 Meijers IL, IN, MI 23 Pavilions CA 24 Pick n Save WI 25 Piggly Wiggly WI 26 Publix FL, GA Page 1 of 85 Nationwide, State-Wide, or Area-Wide Distribution Retailer Name Location 27 Quality Food Center WA 28 Ralphs CA 29 Ralphs Fresh Fare CA 30 Randalls TX 31 Safeway AZ, CA, HI, OR, WA 32 Shaw's MA, NH 33 Smart & Final CA 34 Smith's NV, NM, UT 35 Stater Bros. -
Wulik-Kivalina Rivers Study
Volume 19 Study G-I-P STATE OF ALASKA Jay S. Hammond, Governor Annual Performance Report for INVENTORY AND CATALOGING OF SPORT FISH AND SPORT FISH WATERS OF WESTERN ALASKA Kenneth T. AZt ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME RonaZd 0. Skoog, Commissioner SPORT FISH DIVISION Rupert E. Andrews, Director Section C Job No. G-I-H (continued) Page No. Obj ectives Techniques Used F Results Sport Fish Stocking Test Netting Upper Cook Inlet-Anchorage-West Side Susitna Chinook Salmon Escapement Eulachon Investigations Deshka River Coho Creel Census Eshamy-Western Prince William Sound Rearing Coho and Chinook Salmon Studies Rabideux Creek Montana Creek Discussion Literature Cited Section D Study No. G-I Inventory and Cataloging NO. G-I-N Inventory and Cataloging of Gary A. Pearse Interior Waters with Emphasis on the Upper Yukon and the Haul Road Areas Abstract Background Recommendations Objectives Techniques Used Findings Lake Surveys Survey Summaries of Remote Waters Literature Cited NO. G-I-P Inventory and Cataloging of Kenneth T. Alt Sport Fish and Sport Fish Waters of Western Alaska Abstract Recommendations Objectives Background Techniques Used Findings Fish Species Encountered Section D Job No. G- I-P (continued) Page No. Area Angler Utilization Study Life History Studies of Grayling and Arctic Char in Waters of the Area Arctic Char Grayling Noatak River Drainage Survey Lakes Streams Life History Data on Fishes Collected During 1977 Noatak Survey Lake Trout Northern Pike Least Cisco Arctic Char Grayling Round Whitefish Utilization of Fishes of the Noatak Valley Literature Cited NO. G- I-P Inventory and Cataloging of Kenneth T. -
Erosion and Sedimentation in the Kenai River, Alaska
ay) ifim Erosion and Sedimentation in the Kenai River, Alaska By KEVIN M. SCOTT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1235 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1982 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Scott/ Kevin M./ 1935- Erosion and sedimentation in the Kenai River/ Alaska. (Geological Survey professional paper ; 1235) Bibliography: p. 33-35 Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.16:1235 1. Sediments (Geology) Alaska Kenai River watershed. 2. Erosion Alaska Kenai River watershed. I. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. II. Title. III. Series: United States. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1235. QE571.S412 553.7'8'097983 81-6755 AACR2 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract _-_----___---_-______________________________ 1 Bed material Continued Introduction __________________________________________ 1 Gravel dunes in channel below SkilakLake ___-----_-___- 17 The Kenai River watershed -_-------_---__--_____________ 3 Armoring of the channel _---____------------_-_-----_ 18 Climate ____________________________________ 3 Possible effects of armoring on salmon habitat ___________ 19 Vegetation ________________________________________ 3 Surficial deposits of the modern flood plain _____________ 19 Hydrology ____________________________________________ 4 Suspended sediment -
Fishing Regulations JANUARY - DECEMBER 2004
WEST VIRGINIA Fishing Regulations JANUARY - DECEMBER 2004 West Virginia Division of Natural Resources D I Investment in a Legacy --------------------------- S West Virginia’s anglers enjoy a rich sportfishing legacy and conservation ethic that is maintained T through their commitment to our state’s fishery resources. Recognizing this commitment, the R Division of Natural Resources endeavors to provide a variety of quality fishing opportunities to meet I increasing demands, while also conserving and protecting the state’s valuable aquatic resources. One way that DNR fulfills this part of its mission is through its fish hatchery programs. Many anglers are C aware of the successful trout stocking program and the seven coldwater hatcheries that support this T important fishery in West Virginia. The warmwater hatchery program, although a little less well known, is still very significant to West Virginia anglers. O West Virginia’s warmwater hatchery program has been instrumental in providing fishing opportunities F to anglers for more than 60 years. For most of that time, the Palestine State Fish Hatchery was the state’s primary facility dedicated to the production of warmwater fish. Millions of walleye, muskellunge, channel catfish, hybrid striped bass, saugeye, tiger musky, and largemouth F and smallmouth bass have been raised over the years at Palestine and stocked into streams, rivers, and lakes across the state. I A recent addition to the DNR’s warmwater hatchery program is the Apple Grove State Fish Hatchery in Mason County. Construction of the C hatchery was completed in 2003. It was a joint project of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the DNR as part of a mitigation agreement E for the modernization of the Robert C.