DOCSLIB.ORG

Wild Resource Harvests and Uses by Residents of Seward and Moose Pass, Alaska, 2000

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wild Resource Harvests and Uses by Residents of Seward and Moose Pass, Alaska, 2000 Wild Resource Harvests and Uses by Residents of Seward and Moose Pass, Alaska, 2000 By Brian Davis, James A. Fall, and Gretchen Jennings Technical Paper Number 271 Prepared for: Chugach National Forest US Forest Service 3301 C Street, Suite 300 Anchorage, AK 9950s Purchase Order No. 43-0109-1-0069 Division of Subsistence Alaska Department of Fish and Game Juneau, Alaska June 2003 ADA PUBLICATIONS STATEMENT The Alaska Department of Fish and Game operates all of its public programs and activities free from discrimination on the basis of sex, color, race, religion, national origin, age, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability. For information on alternative formats available for this and other department publications, please contact the department ADA Coordinator at (voice) 907-465-4120, (TDD) 1-800-478-3548 or (fax) 907-586-6595. Any person who believes she or he has been discriminated against should write to: Alaska Department of Fish and Game PO Box 25526 Juneau, AK 99802-5526 or O.E.O. U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 ABSTRACT In March and April of 2001 researchers employed by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game’s (ADF&G) Division of Subsistence conducted 203 interviews with residents of Moose Pass and Seward, two communities in the Kenai Peninsula Borough. The study was designed to collect information about the harvest and use of wild fish, game, and plant resources, demography, and aspects of the local cash economy such as employment and income. These communities were classified “non-rural” by the Federal Subsistence Board in 1990, which periodically reviews its classifications. This study was the first comprehensive harvest assessment done for these communities. Data were collected for the 12-month period between April 1, 2000 and March 31, 2001. The study was funded through a cooperative agreement between ADF&G and the US Forest Service Chugach National Forest. Information was collected during face-to-face interviews using a standard survey form. The goal was to talk with representatives from a randomly selected sample of year- round households in the communities along the first 38 miles of the Seward Highway, grouped in this study as Moose Pass and Seward. Of all households contacted, a majority (81%) agreed to be interviewed. Households were asked for detailed information about their harvest and use of wild foods during the study year, as well as specific locations on the Kenai Peninsula and in Prince William Sound they use to hunt, fish, and gather wild plant resources over the previous ten-year period. Population growth in the study communities has been steady over the past twenty years or so. Between 1980 and 2000, the population in the city of Seward increased by 56.3%. The population of the Moose Pass area has also increased, and although census boundaries have changed of the years, it can be estimated that the area’s population has grown approximately 82% between 1990 and 2000. About 80% of the household heads in both study communities were born outside of Alaska, with an average length of residency in the study communities of around 12 years. Most adults in these communities were employed: 74.5% in Moose Pass and 86.1% in Seward. Much of the work was seasonal. Of those individuals with jobs, about half were employed year-round (60% in Moose Pass and 50% in Seward). Government was the largest employer in Moose Pass (34% of employed individuals), while in Seward 38% were employed in the service sector. People from Seward mostly work in Seward (89.6%), and about half of the Moose Pass workforce commutes to Seward (51.1%). Average household income was similar for the two communities: $61,523 for Seward and $59,051 for Moose Pass. Households in each town reported a similar amount of money spent on food in the study year, $5,600 in Seward and $5,100 in Moose Pass, which represents 9.1% and 8.7% of the average household income, respectively. Answers to the survey questions produced patterns of harvest and use of wild resources for home use in the study communities in 2000/2001. Almost all of the households used wild foods and a large majority fished, hunted, or gathered resources. Sharing of wild foods was also common, with 87% of households in each community receiving at least one resource during the study year. Reported harvests of wild food were 87 pounds per person (236 pounds per household) in Moose Pass and 97 pounds per person (261 pounds per household) in Seward, measured in pounds usable weight. Moose Pass households reported harvesting about 5.3 different resources during 2000/2001 and Seward households harvested approximately 4.4 resources. Salmon was the most important wild resource for each community, constituting 48% of the total pounds harvested in Seward and 37% in Moose Pass. Per capita, salmon accounted for 46 pounds per person per year in Seward, and 32 pounds in Moose Pass, far and away the largest contributor to the household wild food larder. Approximately 20% of all the salmon harvested in Seward came from a commercial catch, and 80% was caught with rod and reel. In Moose Pass, 76% of the salmon was harvested using rod and reel, while only 0.4% came from a commercial catch. Commercial fishing was also the source of 70% of the crab used in the average Seward home. In Moose Pass, large land mammals composed 28% of total pounds of subsistence food harvested. About 16 pounds of moose meat was harvested per person, and caribou and deer each made up approximately 3 pounds per person. In Seward, the large land mammals were the third most important category behind other fish. The average person in Seward harvested approximately 12 pounds of moose meat and about 1 pound each of deer, caribou, and black bear. Fish other than salmon contributed approximately 24% of the total pounds of subsistence food in Seward, and 23% of pounds in Moose Pass. In both Seward and Moose Pass halibut was the most important non-salmon fish harvested, with an average of 13 pounds harvested per person. Rockfish, Dolly Varden, and ling cod round out the category in both communities. Birds, marine invertebrates and plants, when combined for each community, constitute around 12% of the total subsistence harvests measured in pounds. Both communities had a great disparity between high-harvesting households and those that reported taking little or no resources. In both Seward and Moose Pass a small segment of the population harvested most of the wild foods and used on average a much wider variety of wild foods. In Moose Pass the 25% highest harvesting households contributed 81.3% of the community’s total; this top quartile in Seward harvested 81.8% of the total pounds. Looking even more narrowly, 70% of the harvest was taken by the top 15% of Moose Pass households and by 18% in Seward. Conversely, the combined harvests for the 50% lowest harvesting households totaled only 3.4% in Moose Pass and 2.4% in Seward. These low harvesting households also used relatively few kinds of resources, an average of 5.0 kinds in Moose Pass and 4.5 kinds in Seward. In contrast, the top 25 percent of harvesting households in Moose Pass used 13.8 kinds of wild resources and those in Seward used 13.5 kinds. These figures indicate little re-distribution of resources from very active households to relatively inactive households, and the absence of a community-wide pattern of frequent and diverse uses of wild foods. The Division of Subsistence has done survey projects in 14 Kenai Peninsula communities since 1982, with updates in several of those communities. The findings from Seward and Moose Pass from the 2000/2001 study align these communities with the more populous, road connected communities and set them apart from the more remote communities off the road system. Populations range from over 6,000 people in Kenai, and 4,542 people in the Seward study area, to the small communities such as the Moose Pass study area (402 people), Cooper Landing, Hope, Nanwalek, and Port Graham. Nanwalek and Port Graham are largely Alaska Native communities (over 80 percent of the population is Alaska Native). In all other communities, Alaska Natives are a minority. Seward and Moose Pass displayed high levels of employment and cash income. These study communities, along with Kenai, all reported year-round employment for greater than 50 percent of all employed individuals, with an average of around 10 months of employment. According to household survey results, per capita monetary incomes in Seward and Moose Pass are in the same range as those of Kenai, at the high end of the scale for the Kenai Peninsula Borough. Communities off of the road system--Seldovia, Port Graham and Nanwalek-- all had a relatively high level of seasonal employment and a relatively low per capita income. These measures indicate that, despite the presence of seasonally available employment in Seward and Moose Pass, employment is relatively available and reliable, with cash incomes comparable to the most populous areas of the state and generally higher than those of remote areas off the road system. In all Kenai Peninsula communities surveyed by the Division of Subsistence, a very large majority of households, always close to or at 100 percent, used at least one wild resource in the study year, and generally 80 to 90 percent or more harvested wild foods. Estimated pounds of wild foods harvested per household indicate different patterns of use for these communities, however. The road-connected communities, including Seward and Moose Pass, as well as Kenai, Homer, Cooper Landing and Hope, trend toward a per capita harvest of 90-100 pounds.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bears in Oklahoma
    April 2010 Bears in Oklahoma Our speaker for the April 19 meeting of the Oklahoma City Audubon Society will be Jeremy Dixon, wildlife biologist at the Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge. His presentation is titled “The Strange But True History of Bears in Oklahoma.” For many years Jeremy was a biologist in Florida where he studied the interactions between black bears and humans. His master’s research was on the Conservation Genetics of the Florida Black Bear. Jeremy moved to Lawton in 2009 to experience life out here in the middle of the continent. Our grass prairie and ancient granite mountains are a new living environment for him. However, the black bears are coming back across Oklahoma from the east presenting birders an experience with a new and large predator to which we are unaccustomed. With an education from Jeremy, hopefully we can learn how to watch the birds while not feeding the bears ourselves. Come out for bear-hugging good time at bird club and bring a friend. County Birding: Kingfisher Jimmy Woodard On March 11, the group of 7 birders entered Kingfisher County in the far southeast corner. We located several small lakes with waterfowl: Canada Geese, Gadwall, Mallard, Green- Winged Teal and Ruddy Duck. We also found an adult Bald Eagle, the first of two found during the trip. Driving the back roads, we observed Great Horned Owl, Phoebe, King- fisher, and a bunch of sparrows – Harris, White Crowned, Song, Savannah, & Lincoln’s. We visited fields along the Cimarron River southeast of Dover. Carla Brueggen & her hus- band lease fields in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of the Trail Lakes Salmon Hatchery for Consistency with Statewide Policies and Prescribed Management Practices
    Regional Information Report No. 5J12-21 An Evaluation of the Trail Lakes Salmon Hatchery for Consistency with Statewide Policies and Prescribed Management Practices by Mark Stopha October 2012 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Commercial Fisheries Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in the following reports by the Divisions of Sport Fish and of Commercial Fisheries: Fishery Manuscripts, Fishery Data Series Reports, Fishery Management Reports, Special Publications and the Division of Commercial Fisheries Regional Reports. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, as well as in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figure or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Mathematics, statistics centimeter cm Alaska Administrative all standard mathematical deciliter dL Code AAC signs, symbols and gram g all commonly accepted abbreviations hectare ha abbreviations e.g., Mr., Mrs., alternate hypothesis HA kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. base of natural logarithm e kilometer km all commonly accepted catch per unit effort CPUE liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., coefficient of variation CV meter m R.N., etc. common test statistics (F, t, 2, etc.) milliliter mL at @ confidence interval CI millimeter mm compass directions: correlation coefficient east E (multiple) R Weights and measures (English) north N correlation coefficient cubic feet per second ft3/s south S (simple) r foot ft west W covariance cov gallon gal copyright degree (angular ) ° inch in corporate suffixes: degrees of freedom df mile mi Company Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Be Properly 'Armed' Before Doing 'Combat' on Upper Kenai
    Refuge Notebook • Vol. 1, No. 14 • June 11, 1999 Be properly ‘armed’ before doing ‘combat’ on upper Kenai by Bill Kent The 15 miles of the Kenai River upstream from Ski- costs $5, which covers parking for one vehicle. lak Lake, known as the upper Kenai River, will open Boaters usually put in at the Kenai River Bridge for fishing today. Many people know this area pri- in Cooper Landing, just below Kenai Lake and at the marily for the “combat” fishing at the confluence of ferry. Jim’s Landing is the last takeout before the Ke- the Russian and Kenai Rivers and may not think about nai Canyon. If you pass Jim’s Landing, the next take this portion of the river the same way as the lower out is Upper Skilak Lake campground. Please note that reaches below Skilak Lake. However there are differ- Jim’s Landing is closed to fishing. ences and similarities you should keep in mind when The riverbanks of the Upper Kenai are just as frag- visiting this part of Kenai National Wildlife Refuge. ile as the banks below Skilak Lake. Riverbank fishing Everyone fishing the Upper Kenai should review closures are scattered along the river from the bride at the state fishing regulations carefully. There are re- Kenai Lake to Jim’s Landing. These areas are posted strictions on harvest limits, types of gear, and area clo- “Closed” with Fish and Game or refuge signs and are sures which are unique to this area. described in the fishing regulations. For instance, no rainbow trout may be harvested The thousands of visitors who use the upper Kenai there, in keeping with the management strategy de- can generate a great deal of litter and trash.
    [Show full text]
  • Chugach National Forest Wilderness Area Inventory and Evaluation
    Chugach National Forest Wilderness Area Inventory and Evaluation Overview of the Wilderness Area Recommendation Process As part of plan revision, the responsible official, the forest supervisor, shall “identify and evaluate lands that may be suitable for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System and determine whether to recommend any such lands for wilderness designation” (36 CFR 219.7(c)(2)(v), effective May 9, 2012). Forest Service directives (FSH 1909.12, Chapter 70) for implementing the 2012 Planning Rule provide further guidance on how to complete this process in four steps: (1) Identify and inventory all lands that may be suitable for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System (2) Evaluate the wilderness characteristics of each area based on a given set of criteria (3) The forest supervisor will determine which areas to further analyze in the NEPA process (4) The forest supervisor will decide which areas, if any, to recommend for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System This report provides documentation for the inventory and evaluation steps of this process, and is divided into two sections. The first section provides information about the inventory process and results. These results also include a description of the current conditions and management for vegetation, wildlife, fish, recreation, and access to the Chugach National Forest as they are related to wilderness character. This description is intended to provide a big-picture view of national forest resources and serve as a foundation for the evaluation section. The second section provides an area by area evaluation of wilderness characteristics found in the inventoried lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Seward Historic Preservation Plan
    City of Seward City Council Louis Bencardino - Mayor Margaret Anderson Marianna Keil David Crane Jerry King Darrell Deeter Bruce Siemenski Ronald A. Garzini, City Manager Seward Historic Preservation Commissioners Doug Capra Donna Kowalski Virginia Darling Faye Mulholland Jeanne Galvano Dan Seavey Glenn Hart Shannon Skibeness Mike Wiley Project Historian - Anne Castellina Community Development Department Kerry Martin, Director Rachel James - Planning Assistant Contracted assistance by: Margaret Branson Tim Sczawinski Madelyn Walker Funded by: The City of Seward and the Alaska Office of History and Archaeology Recommended by: Seward Historic Preservation Commission Resolution 96-02 Seward Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution 96-11 Adopted by: Seward City Council Resolution 96-133 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction......................................................................................................................................1 Purpose of the Plan ..............................................................................................................1 Method .................................................................................................................................2 Goals for Historic Preservation............................................................................................3 Community History and Character ..................................................................................................4 Community Resources...................................................................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Chugach National Forest 2016 Visitor Guide
    CHUGACH NATIONAL FOREST 2016 VISITOR GUIDE CAMPING WILDILFE VISITOR CENTERS page 10 page 12 page 15 Welcome Get Out and Explore! Hop on a train for a drive-free option into the Chugach National Forest, plan a multiple day trip to access remote to the Chugach National Forest! primitive campsites, attend the famous Cordova Shorebird Festival, or visit the world-class interactive exhibits Table of Contents at Begich, Boggs Visitor Center. There is something for everyone on the Chugach. From the Kenai Peninsula to The Chugach National Forest, one of two national forests in Alaska, serves as Prince William Sound, to the eastern shores of the Copper River Delta, the forest is full of special places. Overview ....................................3 the “backyard” for over half of Alaska’s residents and is a destination for visi- tors. The lands that now make up the Chugach National Forest are home to the People come from all over the world to experience the Chugach National Forest and Alaska’s wilderness. Not Eastern Kenai Peninsula .......5 Alaska Native peoples including the Ahtna, Chugach, Dena’ina, and Eyak. The only do we welcome international visitors, but residents from across the state travel to recreate on Chugach forest’s 5.4 million acres compares in size with the state of New Hampshire and National Forest lands. Whether you have an hour or several days there are options galore for exploring. We have Prince William Sound .............7 comprises a landscape that includes portions of the Kenai Peninsula, Prince Wil- listed just a few here to get you started. liam Sound, and the Copper River Delta.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterfowl in Iowa, Overview
    STATE OF IOWA 1977 WATERFOWL IN IOWA By JACK W MUSGROVE Director DIVISION OF MUSEUM AND ARCHIVES STATE HISTORICAL DEPARTMENT and MARY R MUSGROVE Illustrated by MAYNARD F REECE Printed for STATE CONSERVATION COMMISSION DES MOINES, IOWA Copyright 1943 Copyright 1947 Copyright 1953 Copyright 1961 Copyright 1977 Published by the STATE OF IOWA Des Moines Fifth Edition FOREWORD Since the origin of man the migratory flight of waterfowl has fired his imagination. Undoubtedly the hungry caveman, as he watched wave after wave of ducks and geese pass overhead, felt a thrill, and his dull brain questioned, “Whither and why?” The same age - old attraction each spring and fall turns thousands of faces skyward when flocks of Canada geese fly over. In historic times Iowa was the nesting ground of countless flocks of ducks, geese, and swans. Much of the marshland that was their home has been tiled and has disappeared under the corn planter. However, this state is still the summer home of many species, and restoration of various areas is annually increasing the number. Iowa is more important as a cafeteria for the ducks on their semiannual flights than as a nesting ground, and multitudes of them stop in this state to feed and grow fat on waste grain. The interest in waterfowl may be observed each spring during the blue and snow goose flight along the Missouri River, where thousands of spectators gather to watch the flight. There are many bird study clubs in the state with large memberships, as well as hundreds of unaffiliated ornithologists who spend much of their leisure time observing birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Flyway Breeding Waterfowl Plot Survey, 2019 Anthony Roberts June 26, 2019
    Atlantic Flyway Breeding Waterfowl Plot Survey, 2019 Anthony Roberts June 26, 2019 Acknowledgements The information contained in this report is the result of cooperative efforts from multiple agencies both State and Federal. The following is a list of agencies and personnel involved in data collection. Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection: Min Huang and Kelly Kubik Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife: Agency personnel and cooperators Maryland Department of Natural Resources: Agency personnel and cooperators Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game: Agency personnel and cooperators New Hampshire Department of Fish and Game: Agency personnel and cooperators New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife: Ted Nichols, Lisa Clark, Joe Garris, Jodi Powers, and Austin Damminger New York Division of Fish and Wildlife personnel and cooperators Pennsylvania Game Commission: Agency personnel and cooperators Rhode Island Division of Fish and Wildlife: Agency personnel and cooperators Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife: Agency personnel and cooperators Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries: Agency personnel and cooperators Introduction and Methods The Atlantic Flyway Northeast Plot survey was considered operational in 1993 and was initiated in an effort to collect information about locally breeding waterfowl. The intent was to collect data that would provide the basis for setting waterfowl hunting regulations in the Atlantic Flyway. Currently this effort involves 11 states from Virginia to New Hampshire in which cooperators survey randomly selected 1-km2 plots (Figure 1). These data are then sent to the Atlantic Flyway office in the USFWS’s Division of Migratory Bird Management for analysis. This analysis produces both population and breeding pairs estimates for selected species that are surveyed.
    [Show full text]
  • Marking Juvenile Coho Salmon in the Kenai River with Coded, Microwire Tags
    Fishery Data Series No. 93-52 Marking Juvenile Coho Salmon in the Kenai River With Coded, Microwire Tags bY Jay A. Carlon and James J. Hasbrouck December 1993 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Sport Fish FISHERY DATA SERIES NO. 93-52 MARKING JUVENILE COHO SALMON IN THE KENAI RIVER WITH CODED, MICROWIRE TAGS1 BY Jay A. Carlon and James J. Hasbrouck Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Sport Fish Anchorage, Alaska December 1993 1 This information was partially financed by the Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 777-777K) under Project F-10-8, Job No. S-2-14a. The Fishery Data Series was established in 1987 for the publication of technically oriented results for a single project or group of closely related projects. Fishery Data Series reports are intended for fishery and other technical professionals. Distribution is to state and local publication distribution centers, libraries and individuals and, on request, to other libraries, agencies, and individuals. This publication has undergone editorial and peer review. The Alaska Department of Fish and Game receives federal funding. All of its public programs and activities are operated free from discrimination on the basis of race, religion, sex, color, national origin, age, or handicap. Any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against by this agency should write to: OEO U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 TABLE OF CONTENTS Pane LIST OF TABLES..... iii LIST OF FIGURES .............................................. iv LIST OF APPENDICES ........................................... V ABSTRACT..................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION................................................. 2 Background .............................................. 2 Marking History ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Erosion and Sedimentation in the Kenai River, Alaska
    ay) ifim Erosion and Sedimentation in the Kenai River, Alaska By KEVIN M. SCOTT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1235 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1982 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Scott/ Kevin M./ 1935- Erosion and sedimentation in the Kenai River/ Alaska. (Geological Survey professional paper ; 1235) Bibliography: p. 33-35 Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.16:1235 1. Sediments (Geology) Alaska Kenai River watershed. 2. Erosion Alaska Kenai River watershed. I. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. II. Title. III. Series: United States. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1235. QE571.S412 553.7'8'097983 81-6755 AACR2 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract _-_----___---_-______________________________ 1 Bed material Continued Introduction __________________________________________ 1 Gravel dunes in channel below SkilakLake ___-----_-___- 17 The Kenai River watershed -_-------_---__--_____________ 3 Armoring of the channel _---____------------_-_-----_ 18 Climate ____________________________________ 3 Possible effects of armoring on salmon habitat ___________ 19 Vegetation ________________________________________ 3 Surficial deposits of the modern flood plain _____________ 19 Hydrology ____________________________________________ 4 Suspended sediment
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Professional Paper 543-F, Text
    The Alaska Earthquake March 27, 1964 Regional Effects Ground Breakage in the Cook Inlet Area GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 543-F THE ALASKA EARTHQUAKE, MARCH 27, 1964: REGIONAL EFFECTS Ground Breakage and Associated Effects in the Cook Inlet Area, Alaska, Resulting from the March 27, 1964, Earthquake By HELEN L. FOSTER and THOR N. V. KARLSTROM A description of the ground cracks ,and deposits from ground-water eruptions and crustal changes, particularly in the Kenai Lowland GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 543-F UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1967 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 THE ALASKA EARTHQUAKE SERIES The U.S. Geological Survey is publishing there­ sults of investigations of the earthquake in a series of six Professional Papers. Professional Paper 543 describes the regional effects of the earthquake. Other Professional Papers describe the history of the field investigations and reconstruction effort; the effects of the earthquake on communities; the effects on hydrology; and the effects on transportation, communications, and utilities. CONTENTS Page Page Page Abstract_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ F 1 Ground breakage-Con. Causes of ground breakage_ _ _ _ _ F24 Introduction__________________ 1 Kenai Lowland______________ F3 Crustal changes in the Cook In- Scope of report and source of Northeast-trending zone____
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing in the Seward Area
    Southcentral Region Department of Fish and Game Fishing in the Seward Area About Seward The Seward and North Gulf Coast area is located in the southeastern portion of Alaska’s Kenai Peninsula. Here you’ll find spectacular scenery and many opportunities to fish, camp, and view Alaska’s wildlife. Many Seward area recreation opportunities are easily reached from the Seward Highway, a National Scenic Byway extending 127 miles from Seward to Anchorage. Seward (pop. 2,000) may also be reached via railroad, air, or bus from Anchorage, or by the Alaska Marine ferry trans- portation system. Seward sits at the head of Resurrection Bay, surrounded by the U.S. Kenai Fjords National Park and the U.S. Chugach National Forest. Most anglers fish salt waters for silver (coho), king (chinook), and pink (humpy) salmon, as well as halibut, lingcod, and various species of rockfish. A At times the Division issues in-season regulatory changes, few red (sockeye) and chum (dog) salmon are also harvested. called Emergency Orders, primarily in response to under- or over- King and red salmon in Resurrection Bay are primarily hatch- abundance of fish. Emergency Orders are sent to radio stations, ery stocks, while silvers are both wild and hatchery stocks. newspapers, and television stations, and posted on our web site at www.adfg.alaska.gov . A few area freshwater lakes have stocked or wild rainbow trout populations and wild Dolly Varden, lake trout, and We also maintain a hot line recording at (907) 267- 2502. Or Arctic grayling. you can contact the Anchorage Sport Fish Information Center at (907) 267-2218.
    [Show full text]