DOCSLIB.ORG

Heshbon Expedition the First Campaign at Tell Hesban (1968)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Heshbon Expedition the First Campaign at Tell Hesban (1968) ANDREWS UNIVERSITY HESHBON EXPEDITION THE FIRST CAMPAIGN AT TELL HESBAN (1968) ROGER S. BORAAS SIEGFRIED H. HORN Upsala College Andrews University East Orange, N.J . Berrien Springs, Mich. Set at the edge of the rolling Moabite plain where wadis begin to cut down sharply to the Jordan valley to the west, TeZZ Hesbdn (Biblical Heshbon) commands a panoramic view to the east, south and west from its topmost elevation of 895 meters above sea level. Located 26 road kilometers southwest of Amman in the Transjordan, it is some 11 kilometers north of the present administrative headquarters for the district, Madeba. Jerusalem lies about 75 kilometers straight off to the west, and on clear mornings one can see the green of Jericho and the waters of the Dead Sea some 30 kilometers west at the bottom of the valley. Access to the modern village is provided by good asphalt roads from both Amman and Madeba.l Since no accurate contour map of the site was available prior to the beginning of the first season's work, the con- formation of the tell can be described only in a general way. Most striking is a rectangular shaped acropolis ca. 40 m. north-south by 30 m. east-west. Surrounding it on all sides is a gradually sloping shelf from ca. 40 to 60 m. wide from which a rapid drop to lower levels is discernible on all sides except the southwest. These two features comprise the main contours visible as one approaches the site and were the prime focus of attention in the first season's excavation (Plate X : A). For location of the site in relation to other centers of culture at various periods, cf. any standard Bible atlas, e.g., H. G. May, ed., Oxford BibEe Atlas (London,1962), pp. 49, 57, 59, 61,63, 65, 69, 73, 77. 7 98 R. S. BORAAS AND S. H. HORN Evidence of ruins continued on a long sloping ridge running southwest from the main tell. This included substantial walls of buildings in various states of disrepair. In addition, this ridge has become the location of the houses of most of the present villagers, built mainly along the access drive from the asphalt road which skirts the tell to the east. Two other general features are noteworthy. The Wadi Hesbh drops rather sharply from the plain north of the site to form a deep cut on the west side of the tell running from north to south, subsequently turning west in its course down to the Jordan valley. Across the wadi is another ridge of the limestone and chert native to the area. Pockmarked with an estimated hundred or more caves (some natural) still being used for animal pens, crop storage and winter dwellings, the ridge is sufficiently high to cut off visibility from the tell to the northwest at a distance approximately a mile from the acropolis. This com- prised the most serious limitation to the excellent pattern of visibility range which enhanced the defense potential of the ancient city. The weather pattern is the two-season climate character- istic of Palestine, dominated by a northwest wind which blew regularly throughout our working season with a definite cooling effect on the sun's heat even at mid-day. That this factor assists in sustaining the agriculture carried on in the surrounding plains is evident even to the casual ~bserver.~ Conspicuous in the assessment of the total resources of the site is the lack of any ample natural sources of fresh water. That compensation in the form of cistern storage facilities should comprise a considerable proportion of ancient con- struction is no more surprising than the extensive use of such facihties by the modern inhabitants. a On a few of our working days the wind was sufficiently strong to impede efficiency. It was felt primaxily by the crews working on the west side of the tell (in dirt-moving operations) and by the architects and photographers (anchoring drawing boards and altitude photo- graphic gear required special precautions). Neshbods Histwy From Literary Sowces The prominence of gesbkvt is well attested in several histor- ical periods from literq evidence available. Heshbon is mentioned first in connection with the Israelite invasion of Transjordan some 40 years after the Exodus. At that time Heshbon was the capital of Sihon, king of the Amo- rites. However, according to Num 21 :26-30, Sihon had ex- pelled the Moabites from Heshbon, hence the Moabites must have been in possession of that city prior to the arrival of the Amorites. This is further confirmed by the fact that in the Pentateuch the area surrounding Heshbon is called "the plain of Moab" or "the land of Moab" (Num 22 :I ; 31 :12 ; 33:48; 36: 13 ; Dt 34: 5, 6). However, in Moses' time the northern border of Moab was the river Arnon, some 40 kilometers south of Heshbon. When the Israelites arrived from Egypt they requested from Sihon of Heshbon permission to travel through his land. When Sihon denied this request a war ensued, which the Amorites lost. In the course of the wax, Heshbon was taken and apparently destroyed; at least the Biblical record speaks of "the children of Reuben" as having built (or rebuilt) Heshbon after the city was allotted to them (Num zr :21-26, 34; 32137;Jos 13115,17). Later, the city seems to have changed hands, for according to Jos zr :38,39, it belonged to the tribe of Gad. The possession by Gad of the Heshbon area is confirmed by King Mesha of the 9th century who claims in the Moabite Stone inscription to have taken the temtory north of the Arnon from the tribe of Gad who had occupied it (lines 10, 11). By the time of Judge Jephthah, Heshbon had been a city in which Levites dwelt (Jos 21 :3g; I Chr 6:81). This brief account of the history of Heshbon as known before excavation began is based on a B.D. thesis presented by Werner Vyhmeister and deposited in the James White Library of Andrews University. A condensation appeared in A USS, VI (1968), r 58-177. I00 R. S, BORAAS AND S. H. HORN In Solomon's time "the country of Sihon, king of the Amorites," in which Heshbon was situated, is mentioned as belonging to one of the districts into which that king organized his realm (I Ki 4 :19). In Canticles "the fishpools of Heshbon, by the gate of Bath-rabbim" (ch. 7 :4) are mentioned. Bath- rabbim seems to have been the name of a city gate. For two centuries the Bible is silent about Heshbon, but in the time of the prophet Isaiah (ca. 700 B.c.) Heshbon, together with Madeba, Elealah, and other cities, which had formerly belonged to Israel, appears to have been in the hands of the Moabites (Is 15:2, 4; 16:8, g). It is possible that the city fell to them as the result of Mesha's conquest of the Gadite territory described on the Moabite Stone, although Heshbon is not mentioned in that inscription. That conquest took place in the second half of the 9th century and preceded Isaiah's prophecy by more than IOO years. In a prophecy of Jeremiah (ch. 48:2, 34, 45) Heshbon shares the prophet's denunciation with other Moabite cities, indicating Moabite possession in the earlier part of Jeremiah's ministry. However, in a later oracle of Jeremiah (ch. 49 :2, 3), Heshbon appears to be an Ammonite city, having apparently changed hands during Jeremiah's life. How and when this happened is uncertain, but it has been suggested that Eze 25 :9, 10 casts light on this event. This passage refers to an invasion of eastern tribes and of the Ammonites, in con- nection with which Heshbon may have fallen into their hands. During the Hellenistic period a strong Jewish population developed in Transjordan. In order to bring this region into the Jewish state founded by the Maccabees, their rulers- Jonathan in 147 and John Hyrcanus in 129-annexed terri- tories beyond the Jordan. The last mentioned king captured Madeba (Jos., A&. xiii. 9.1).Although Heshbon is not rnention- ed in the records dealing with these wars, there can be little doubt that it must have come into the possession of John Hyrcanus at that time, because it is listed among the cities of Moab that were in Jewish hands soon after, namely during the reign of Alexander Jannaeus, who ruled from 103-76 (ibid., 15.4). During the time of Herod the Great (40-4), Esbus-as Heshbon was then called-became a fsrtress city guarding HerodJs kingdom against the Nabataeans in Transjordan. At the outbreak of the Jewish-Roman war in A. D. 66 the city was sacked by the Jews (Jos., War, ii. 18.1), but it does not seem to have been held by the Jewish rebels for any length of time. After Emperor Trajan dissolved the Nabataean kingdom in A.D. 106, Esbus became part of the Roman province of Arabia Petraea. In the third century it was even allowed by the Emperor Elagabalus to coin its own money. At what time Esbus became a Christian city is not known, but that it was the seat of a Christian bishop in the 4th century is attested by the records of the Council of Nicaea in 325, which repeatedly mention Bishop Gennadius of Esbus. Again the acts of the Council of Ephesus, held in 431,mention a bishop of Esbus whose name was Zosus. At that time the bishop of Esbus seems to have been subject to the patriarch of Antioch.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY 1. Roman Road
    THE TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY S. DOUGLAS WATERHOUSE ROBERT IBACH, JR. Andrews University Grace Theological Seminary Berrien Springs, Michigan Winona Lake, Indiana 1. Roman Road from Liwius to Esbus (Fig. 10) To trace the Roman road from Livias (modern Ten er-Rameh) in the Jordan Valley to Esbus (the Greek-Latin designation for Biblical Heshbon), a survey team of four was commi~sioned.~ Long known but never completely traced, this Roman road connected Jerusalem, Jericho, Livias, and Esbus, thus linking the road system of Palestine with the famous north-south uia nova of Trajan in the Roman province of Arabia, east of the Jordan (where Esbus/ Heshbon is situated ) .2 Just as Trajan's north-south "new road" was built ( A.D. 111-114 ) along the course of the much older Biblical "King's Highway" (Num 20:17; 21:22; cf. Gn 145, 6),3so the east-west road, from Jericho to Heshbon, was built near, if not always along, the Biblical "Way of Beth-Jeshimoth" (see the 'Hebrew text of Jos The survey team was to trace the Roman road from Esbus to the Jordan Valley and to obtain an archaeological picture of the occupational sites near Tell Hesbdn, with special emphasis on the large valley, the Wadi Hesbdn. Team members were S. Douglas Waterhouse, Robert Ibach, Charlene Hogsten, Eugenia Nitowski (part-time), and (as translators) the representatives of the Jordanian Department of Antiquities attached to the Heshbon Expedition. a Peter Thomsen, "Die romischen Meilensteine der Provinzen Syria, Arabia und Palaestina," ZDPV, 40 (1917): 67-68; Michael Avi-Yonah, The Holy Land (Grand Rapids, Mich., 1966), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Heshbon (Modern Hesbdn) Is Located in Transj Ordan
    THE HISTORY OF HESHBON FROM LITERARY SOURCES * WERNER VYHMEISTER River Plate College, Puiggari, Entre Rios, Argentina Heshbon (modern Hesbdn) is located in Transjordan, about 20 miles east of the Jordan where it enters the Dead Sea. The remains of the old city are covered now by two hills, 2,930 and 2,954 feet above sea level respectively. According to the latest available statistics (from 1961), the village of Hesbdn has 718 inhabitants. Heshbon in OT Times Heshbon appears for the first time in the Biblical record as the capital city of Sihon, the Amorite king defeated by Moses. However, the region in which Heshbon was located is mentioned much earlier in the Bible. In Gn 14:5, Chedor- laomer and his confederates appear as smiting successively the Rephaim in Ashteroth-karnaim, the Zuzim in Ham, and the Emim in Shaveh Kiriathaim (i.e., the plain of Kiria- thaim). Kiriathaim has been identified with el-Qerei ydt, about five miles northwest of Dhz'bdn. It appears together with Heshbon in Num 32:37 among the cities rebuilt by the This article is a condensation of a B.D. thesis covering the same subject, deposited in the James White Library of Andrews University. * "Heshbon," Encyclopaedia Biblica, eds. T. K. Cheyne and J. S. Black, I1 (London, I~OI),col. 2044. "mi Dajani, director of the Department of Antiquities of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Letter to the author, December 12, 1966. 8 Num 21 :21 ff. 4 Siegfried H. Horn et al., Seventh-day Adventist Bible Dictionary (Washington, D. C., 1960)~p.
    [Show full text]
  • A Christian's Map of the Holy Land
    A CHRISTIAN'S MAP OF THE HOLY LAND Sidon N ia ic n e o Zarefath h P (Sarepta) n R E i I T U A y r t s i Mt. of Lebanon n i Mt. of Antilebanon Mt. M y Hermon ’ Beaufort n s a u b s s LEGEND e J A IJON a H Kal'at S Towns visited by Jesus as I L e o n Nain t e s Nimrud mentioned in the Gospels Caesarea I C Philippi (Banias, Paneas) Old Towns New Towns ABEL BETH DAN I MA’ACHA T Tyre A B a n Ruins Fortress/Castle I N i a s Lake Je KANAH Journeys of Jesus E s Pjlaia E u N s ’ Ancient Road HADDERY TYRE M O i REHOB n S (ROSH HANIKRA) A i KUNEITRA s Bar'am t r H y s u Towns visited by Jesus MISREPOTH in K Kedesh sc MAIM Ph a Sidon P oe Merom am n HAZOR D Tyre ic o U N ACHZIV ia BET HANOTH t Caesarea Philippi d a o Bethsaida Julias GISCALA HAROSH A R Capernaum an A om Tabgha E R G Magdala Shave ACHSAPH E SAFED Zion n Cana E L a Nazareth I RAMAH d r Nain L Chorazin o J Bethsaida Bethabara N Mt. of Beatitudes A Julias Shechem (Jacob’s Well) ACRE GOLAN Bethany (Mt. of Olives) PISE GENES VENISE AMALFI (Akko) G Capernaum A CABUL Bethany (Jordan) Tabgha Ephraim Jotapata (Heptapegon) Gergesa (Kursi) Jericho R 70 A.D. Magdala Jerusalem HAIFA 1187 Emmaus HIPPOS (Susita) Horns of Hittin Bethlehem K TIBERIAS R i Arbel APHEK s Gamala h Sea of o Atlit n TARICHAFA Galilee SEPPHORIS Castle pelerin Y a r m u k E Bet Tsippori Cana Shearim Yezreel Valley Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Conquests of Canaan
    ÅA Wars in the Middle East are almost an every day part of Eero Junkkaala:of Three Canaan Conquests our lives, and undeniably the history of war in this area is very long indeed. This study examines three such wars, all of which were directed against the Land of Canaan. Two campaigns were conducted by Egyptian Pharaohs and one by the Israelites. The question considered being Eero Junkkaala whether or not these wars really took place. This study gives one methodological viewpoint to answer this ques- tion. The author studies the archaeology of all the geo- Three Conquests of Canaan graphical sites mentioned in the lists of Thutmosis III and A Comparative Study of Two Egyptian Military Campaigns and Shishak and compares them with the cities mentioned in Joshua 10-12 in the Light of Recent Archaeological Evidence the Conquest stories in the Book of Joshua. Altogether 116 sites were studied, and the com- parison between the texts and the archaeological results offered a possibility of establishing whether the cities mentioned, in the sources in question, were inhabited, and, furthermore, might have been destroyed during the time of the Pharaohs and the biblical settlement pe- riod. Despite the nature of the two written sources being so very different it was possible to make a comparative study. This study gives a fresh view on the fierce discus- sion concerning the emergence of the Israelites. It also challenges both Egyptological and biblical studies to use the written texts and the archaeological material togeth- er so that they are not so separated from each other, as is often the case.
    [Show full text]
  • Shiloh and Shechem: Competing Traditions? Paper for SBL Berlin, 2002 by Ingrid Hjelm, University of Copenhagen Diachronically, I
    Reproduced from the Library of the Editor of www.theSamaritanUpdate.com Copyright 2008 Shiloh and Shechem: Competing Traditions? Paper for SBL Berlin, 2002 By Ingrid Hjelm, University of Copenhagen Diachronically, in biblical tradition, whether Hebrew or Greek, and in Samaritan chronicles, Shiloh stands between the Shechem of the Patriarchs and the Jerusalem of the Davidides. While in biblical traditions, Shiloh’s connotations are ambiguous, in Samaritan tradition, the location is presented entirely negatively, as a competing cult place from the time of the interim between the kings of the Ra ∗w#n (MT: judges) and the kings of the Phanuta , i.e. the Israelite monarchies. In Samaritan tradition, Shiloh owes its origin to the priest Eli’s departure from Gerizim. The narrative occurs in all Samaritan traditions with slight variations. The young Eli, son of Jefunneh of the lineage of Ithamar, is given the honorary office of being the chancellor of the temple treasures 1[1] under the leadership of the high priest Uzzi ( ∫ ), whose authority he challenges. 2[2] The quarrel results in Eli’s departure from Gerizim and his erection of a temple and cult in Shiloh. A variant tradition involves exclusion, because of non-observant behaviour ( Chron. II ¸ §LK*, U*, AF page 41 ). 3[3] Eli’s departure turns the fate of all Israel, which looses its coherence and becomes split into three separate groups (cf. Chron. II , Judg. §LO*-T*; 1 Sam. §BA*-F*; AF page 42) : ‘A faction on Mount Gerizim; an heretical faction that followed false gods; and the faction that followed Eli son of Yafn 3 in Shiloh’.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Conquest of Canaan: Presidential Address at the Annual Meeting, Dec
    Israel's Conquest of Canaan: Presidential Address at the Annual Meeting, Dec. 27, 1912 Author(s): Lewis Bayles Paton Reviewed work(s): Source: Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 32, No. 1 (Apr., 1913), pp. 1-53 Published by: The Society of Biblical Literature Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3259319 . Accessed: 09/04/2012 16:53 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Society of Biblical Literature is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Biblical Literature. http://www.jstor.org JOURNAL OF BIBLICAL LITERATURE Volume XXXII Part I 1913 Israel's Conquest of Canaan Presidential Address at the Annual Meeting, Dec. 27, 1912 LEWIS BAYLES PATON HARTFORD THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY problem of Old Testament history is more fundamental NO than that of the manner in which the conquest of Canaan was effected by the Hebrew tribes. If they came unitedly, there is a possibility that they were united in the desert and in Egypt. If their invasions were separated by wide intervals of time, there is no probability that they were united in their earlier history. Our estimate of the Patriarchal and the Mosaic traditions is thus conditioned upon the answer that we give to this question.
    [Show full text]
  • Israelite Inscriptions from the Time of Jeremiah and Lehi
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Faculty Publications 2020-02-04 Israelite Inscriptions from the Time of Jeremiah and Lehi Dana M. Pike Brigham Young University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, Mormon Studies Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Pike, Dana M., "Israelite Inscriptions from the Time of Jeremiah and Lehi" (2020). Faculty Publications. 3697. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/3697 This Peer-Reviewed Article is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Chapter 7 Israelite Inscriptions from the Time of Jeremiah and Lehi Dana M. Pike The greater the number of sources the better when investi- gating the history and culture of people in antiquity. Narrative and prophetic texts in the Bible and 1 Nephi have great value in helping us understand the milieu in which Jeremiah and Lehi received and fulfilled their prophetic missions, but these records are not our only documentary sources. A number of Israelite inscriptions dating to the period of 640–586 b.c., the general time of Jeremiah and Lehi, provide additional glimpses into this pivotal and primarily tragic period in Israelite history. The number of inscriptions discovered from ancient Israel and its immediate neighbors—Ammon, Moab, Edom, Philistia, and Phoenicia—pales in comparison to the bountiful harvest of texts from ancient Assyria, Babylonia, and Egypt.
    [Show full text]
  • Joshua 12-13.Pdf
    Joshua 11:23 So Joshua took the whole land, according to all that the LORD had spoken to Moses. And Joshua gave it for an inheritance to Israel according to their tribal allotments. And the land had rest from war. I. Don’t Forget 12 Now these are the kings of the land whom the people of Israel defeated and took possession of their land beyond the Jordan towards the sunrise, from the Valley of the Arnon to Mount Hermon, with all the Arabah eastwards: 2 Sihon king of the Amorites who lived at Heshbon and ruled from Aroer, which is on the edge of the Valley of the Arnon, and from the middle of the valley as far as the river Jabbok, the boundary of the Ammonites, that is, half of Gilead, 3 and the Arabah to the Sea of Chinneroth eastwards, and in the direction of Beth-jeshimoth, to the Sea of the Arabah, the Salt Sea, southwards to the foot of the slopes of Pisgah; I. Don’t Forget 4 and Og[a] king of Bashan, one of the remnant of the Rephaim, who lived at Ashtaroth and at Edrei 5 and ruled over Mount Hermon and Salecah and all Bashan to the boundary of the Geshurites and the Maacathites, and over half of Gilead to the boundary of Sihon king of Heshbon. 6 Moses, the servant of the LORD, and the people of Israel defeated them. And Moses the servant of the LORD gave their land for a possession to the Reubenites and the Gadites and the half-tribe of Manasseh.
    [Show full text]
  • Pig Husbandry in Iron Age Israel and Judah
    Pig Husbandry in Iron Age Israel and Judah: New Insights Regarding the Origin of the "Taboo" Author(s): Lidar Sapir-Hen, Guy Bar-Oz, Yuval Gadot and Israel Finkelstein Source: Zeitschrift des Deutschen Palästina-Vereins (1953-), Bd. 129, H. 1 (2013), pp. 1-20 Published by: Deutscher verein zur Erforschung Palästinas Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43664894 Accessed: 03-10-2018 18:50 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Deutscher verein zur Erforschung Palästinas is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Zeitschrift des Deutschen Palästina-Vereins (1953-) This content downloaded from 129.2.19.102 on Wed, 03 Oct 2018 18:50:48 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Pig Husbandry in Iron Age Israel and Judah New Insights Regarding the Origin of the "Taboo" By Lidar Sapir-Hen, Guy Bar-Oz, Yuval Gadot, and Israel Finkelstein 1. Introduction The biblical prohibition against the consumption of pork (Lev 11:7; Deut 14:8), observed in Judaism for over two millennia, is the reason for the special attention paid to the appearance of pig bones in Iron Age strata in the southern Levant1.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology and Religion in Late Bronze Age Canaan
    religions Article Archaeology and Religion in Late Bronze Age Canaan Aaron Greener W.F. Albright Institute of Archaeological Research in Jerusalem, Salah e-Din St 26, 91190 Jerusalem, Israel; [email protected] Received: 28 February 2019; Accepted: 2 April 2019; Published: 9 April 2019 Abstract: Dozens of temples were excavated in the Canaanite city-states of the Late Bronze Age. These temples were the focal points for the Canaanites’ cultic activities, mainly sacrifices and ceremonial feasting. Numerous poetic and ritual texts from the contemporary city of Ugarit reveal the rich pantheon of Canaanite gods and goddesses which were worshiped by the Canaanites. Archaeological remains of these rites include burnt animal bones and many other cultic items, such as figurines and votive vessels, which were discovered within the temples and sanctuaries. These demonstrate the diverse and receptive character of the Canaanite religion and ritual practices. It seems that the increased Egyptian presence in Canaan towards the end of the period had an influence on the local belief system and rituals in some areas, a fact which is demonstrated by the syncretic architectural plans of several of the temples, as well as by glyptic and votive items. Late Bronze Age religious and cultic practices have attracted much attention from Biblical scholars and researchers of the religion of Ancient Israel who are searching for the similarities and influences between the Late Bronze Age and the following Iron Age. Keywords: Late Bronze Age; Canaan; religion; cult; temples; Egypt 1. Introduction Numerous excavations and a fairly large number of contemporary written documents give us a good picture of the religious system and cult practices in Canaan1 during the Late Bronze Age (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fifth Word: Confederation
    The Fifth Word: Confederation The illustration above depicts Joshua leading a covenant ceremony at the ancient city of Shechem. It was there that the now famous words were spoken: “Choose this day whom you will serve. … but as for me and my household, we will serve the LORD.” The story, recorded in Joshua 24:1-18, states that Joshua wrote the words of the covenant in the book of the Law and took a large stone that he set up under an oak tree as a witness to the oath that the people had taken to serve the LORD, the God of Israel, and him alone.” This took place after the armies of the descendants of Israel (Jacob) had gone through the land capturing one Canaanite city after another. Eventually they were able to claim their own place in the land of Promise, but they had to settle in among people who did not know or acknowledge Yahweh. The people of Canaan continued to worship a fertility god named Ba’al, and eventually the Jews inability to worship the LORD alone led to their downfall. But that is the topic for the next word. The fifth word covers the period of the conquest of the Promised Land and the first attempt at self-government for the Jews. Most people are unaware that the Israelites crossed a second body of water when they entered the Promised Land opposite the city of Jericho. Like the crossing of the Sea of Reeds a generation before, the crossing of the flooded and rapidly flowing Jordan River was a dramatic miracle that confirmed God’s continued presence with the people.
    [Show full text]
  • Deut.2.24 37
    Deut. 2:24-37 I. Verses 24-25: set out II. Verses 26- 31: Message to Sihon, the king of Heshbon; message rejected III. Verses 32- 37: The people of Israel conquer Heshbon I. Verses 24-25: set out a. Deut 2: 24-25: ‘Arise, set out, and pass through the valley of Arnon. Look! I have given Sihon the Amorite, king of Heshbon, and his land into your hand; begin to take possession and contend with him in battle.25 This day I will begin to put the dread and fear of you upon the peoples everywhere under the heavens, who, when they hear the report of you, will tremble and be in anguish because of you.’ b. Remember we are picking up from their travels in the previous section. c. In the beginning of chapter 2 they were traveling through locations but told to leave the descendants of Lot and Esau alone. d. The ESV Study Bible gives a really good note about Sihon the Amorite: See note on Deut. 1:3–4. According to Gen. 15:16, the land would be given to Israel when the iniquity of the Amorites was complete, and now that time has come. Thus the defeat of various nations represents God's punishment for their iniquity (Deut. 18:12). (See Introduction to Joshua: The Destruction of the Canaanites.) In holy war, enemies tremble before the Lord (Ex. 15:14; see also Josh. 4:24–5:1). e. This is recorded in Num 21:13, 14 and recounted in Judg 11:18 f.
    [Show full text]