DOCSLIB.ORG

Supplementary Reports Ecoregional Conservation Plan for the Caucasus 2020 Edition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supplementary Reports Ecoregional Conservation Plan for the Caucasus 2020 Edition ECOREGIONAL CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE CAUCASUS 2020 EDITION SUPPLEMENTARY REPORTS ECOREGIONAL CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE CAUCASUS 2020 EDITION SUPPLEMENTARY REPORTS TBILISI 2020 The Ecoregional Conservation Plan for the Caucasus has been revised in the frame of the Transboundary Joint Secretariat-Phase III Project, funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) through KfW Development Bank and implemented by WWF Caucasus Programme Office with the involvement of the AHT GROUP AG - REC Caucasus Consortium. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of organizations and institutions who were involved in preparing ECP 2020 or who provided financial support or support in kind. None of the entities involved assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of information disclosed in the publication. Editors: N. Zazanashvili, M. Garforth and M. Bitsadze Ecoregional Maps: G. Beruchashvili and N. Arobelidze, WWF / © WWF Suggested citation for the publication: Zazanashvili, N., Garforth, M. and Bitsadze, M., eds. (2020). Ecoregional Conservation Plan for the Caucasus, 2020 Edition: Supplementary Reports. WWF, KfW, Tbilisi. Suggested citation for each report – see at the end of the reports. ISBN 978-9941-8-2374-9 Designed by David Gabunia Printed by Fountain Georgia LTD, Tbilisi, Georgia, 2020 2020 EDITION SUPPLEMENTARY REPORTS FOREWORD AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The 2020 Edition of the Ecoregional Conservation Plan (ECP) for the Caucasus is published in two parts. The first and main part – “Ecoregional Conservation Plan for the Caucasus: 2020 Edition”– presents an overview of the Ecoregion’s biodiversity and the general threats which it faces, describes the main actors in the field of biodiversity conservation in the Caucasus, explains the role of the ECP as a regional instrument for implementing international agreements related to biodiversity, discusses the main conceptual approaches for developing this edition of ECP, and presents the plan itself with its targets and actions. This second part of the ECP presents supplementary reports that include an explanation of the rationale for the Ecoregion’s boundaries, a detailed description of the Key Biodiversity Areas and Conservation Landscapes (which form the basis of the Ecological Network envisaged by the ECP), and information about the status of the Ecoregion’s threatened species in the following groups: large carnivores, large herbivores, birds, amphibians and reptiles, freshwater fish and lampreys, and flora (vascular plants) and vegetation. The chapters also include information on physical-geographical features of the Caucasus, terrestrial ecoregions within the boundaries of the Caucasus combined ecoregion, biomes that create the basis of the main habitats, particular threats to the groups, and on-going conservation efforts and proposals for additional conservation actions. The compilers of each report represent all six countries of the Caucasus ecoregion: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Iran, Russia and Turkey. The order of the compilers’ names (after the first author who wrote the main text) usually follows the alphabetical order of the ecoregion’s countries’ names with some exceptions (when the co-authors’ order follows their input to the particular report). The editors and compilers of this publication are grateful to the governmental organizations and agencies who kindly provided data for the reports. We extend our thanks to all experts and specialists who supported the preparation of ECP 2020 and its separate parts by providing materials or personal communications. Special thanks are owed to the Government of Germany, particularly, the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and KfW Development Bank for their crucial financial support for the revision and publication of ECP 2020. 3 2020 EDITION SUPPLEMENTARY REPORTS TABLE OF CONTENTS TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 6 THE BOUNDARIES AND BIO-PHYSICAL FEATURES OF THE CAUCASUS ECOREGION 9 compiled by N. Zazanashvili, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, M. Mousavi, V. Krever, S. Kalem and M. Garforth KEY BIODIVERSITY AREAS IN THE CAUCASUS ECOREGION 21 compiled by M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, M. Mousavi, V. Shmunk, S. Kalem, N. Zazanashvili, R. Mnatsekanov, S. Devranoglu Tavsel, M. Cevik, K. Ahmadova, G. Beruchashvili, A. Kandaryan and M. Garforth CONSERVATION LANDSCAPES IN THE CAUCASUS ECOREGION 29 compiled by N. Zazanashvili, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, M. Mousavi, V. Shmunk, S. Kalem, G. Beruchashvili, M. Bitsadze and M. Garforth STATUS OF LARGE CARNIVORES IN THE CAUCASUS 37 compiled by E. Askerov, K. Manvelyan, Z. Gurielidze, M. Mousavi, V. Shmunk, S. Trepet, A.E. Kütükçü, A. Heidelberg and N. Zazanashvili STATUS OF LARGE HERBIVORES IN THE CAUCASUS 48 compiled by P. Weinberg, E. Askerov, K. Manvelyan, Z. Gurielidze, M. Mousavi, A.E. Kütükçü, A. Heidelberg and N. Zazanashvili STATUS OF BIRDS IN THE CAUCASUS 72 compiled by Z. Javakhishvili, K. Aghababyan, E. Sultanov, M. Tohidifar, R. Mnatsekanov and S. Isfendiyaroğlu AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES OF THE CAUCASUS 83 compiled by B.S. Tuniyev, D. Tarkhnishvili, A.L. Aghasyan, S.N. Bunyatova, K. Kamali, S.M. Mirghazanfari, C.V. Tok and K. Çiçek FRESHWATER FISH AND LAMPREYS OF THE CAUCASUS 97 compiled by J. Freyhof, S. Pipoyan N. Mustafayev, S. Ibrahimov, B. Japoshvili, O. Sedighi, B. Levin, A. Pashkov and D. Turan FLORA AND VEGETATION OF THE CAUCASUS 106 compiled by K. Batsatsashvili, A. Nersesyan, N. Mehdiyeva, R. Murtazaliev, Ö. Eminağaoğlu and K. Kavousi ANNEXES Annex 1: The IUCN Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus Ecoregion 119 Annex 2: Key Biodiversity Areas with Associated Trigger Species 129 Annex 3: Summary of Species Parameters of Key Biodiversity Areas 153 Annex 4. Description of Conservation and Bridging Landscapes 159 Annex 5. Map of Key Biodiversity Areas, and Conservation and Bridging Landscapes 177 5 ECOREGIONAL CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE CAUCASUS TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Aggregation A geographically restricted clustering of individuals that typically occurs during a specific life history stage or process such as breeding, feeding or migration. This clustering is indicated by highly localised relative abundance, two or more orders magnitude larger than the species` average recorded numbers or densities at other stages during its life-cycle (IUCN, 2016). a. s. l. Above sea level Bern Convention Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats Biosphere Reserve The UNESCO World Network of Biosphere Reserves covers internationally designated protected areas, each known as biosphere reserves. Each reserve promotes solutions reconciling the conservation of biodiversity with its sustainable use. BL Bridging Landscape BMZ German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development Bridging Landscape A physical-geographical entity that physically connects Conservation Landscapes. CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CEPF The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund CL Conservation Landscape CMS Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals CNF Caucasus Nature Fund Conservation A geographically defined large area, typically larger than 5000 km², identified as priority for Landscape conserving biodiversity and maintaining healthy ecological processes and environmental services. CR Critically Endangered, category of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. DD Data Deficient, according to the IUCN Red List: a taxon is Data Deficient when there is inadequate information to make a direct, or indirect, assessment of its risk of extinction based on its distribution and/or population status. ECF Eco-Corridors Fund for the Caucasus (WWF/BMZ/KfW long-term project) ECP The Ecoregional Conservation Plan for the Caucasus Ecological Corridor A clearly defined geographical space that is governed and managed over the long-term to conserve or restore effective landscape connectivity, with associated ecosystem services and cultural and spiritual values (slightly modified from a draft definition by Hilty et al., 2019). Emerald network The Emerald network is a network of Areas of Special Conservation Interest to conserve wild flora and fauna and their natural habitats of Europe, launched by Council of Europe under the Bern Convention. EN Endangered, category of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. European Diploma A prestigious international award granted since 1965 by the Committee of Ministers of the Council for Protected Areas of Europe. It recognises natural and semi-natural areas and landscapes of exceptional European importance for the preservation of biological, geological and landscape diversity, which are managed in an exemplary way. FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations GEF The Global Environment Facility Geographically Species having a restricted global distribution, as measured by range, extent of suitable habitat or Restricted Species area of occupancy, and hence largely confined or endemic to a relatively small portion of the globe such as bioregion, ecoregion or site (IUCN, 2016). Global 200 The Global 200 is the list (and the map) of ecoregions identified by WWF as priorities for conservation. Globally Species categorised in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species as Critically Endangered (CR), Threatened Species Endangered (EN) or Vulnerable (VU). IBA An Important Bird and Biodiversity Area (IBA) is an area identified using an internationally agreed set of criteria as being globally
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Study on Fishing and Resource Management of Bony Fisheries Within Southern Caspian Sea
    The Study on fishing and resource management of bony fisheries within Southern Caspian Sea Item Type Report Authors Abdolmalaki, Shahram; Taghavi, S.A.; Motalebi, A.A.; Sharif Rohani, M.; Ghasemi, S.; Parafkandeh Haghighi, F.; Fazli, H.; Vahabnejad, A.; Ghaninejad, D.; Karimi, D.; Rahmati, M.; Daryanabard, R.; Bandani, G.A.; Talebzadeh, S.A.; Akhoondi, M. Publisher Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute Download date 30/09/2021 16:11:40 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/13405 وزارت ﺟﻬﺎد ﻛﺸﺎورزي ﺳﺎزﻣﺎن ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎت ، آﻣﻮزش و ﺗﺮوﻳﺞﻛ ﺸﺎورزي ﻣﻮﺳﺴﻪ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎت ﻋﻠﻮم ﺷﻴﻼﺗﻲ ﻛﺸﻮر – ﭘﮋوﻫﺸﻜﺪه آﺑﺰي ﭘﺮوري آﺑﻬﺎي داﺧﻠﻲ ﻋﻨﻮان : : ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎت ﺻﻴﺪ و ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ذﺧﺎﻳﺮ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺎن اﺳﺘﺨﻮاﻧﻲ در ﺣﻮﺿﻪ ﺟﻨﻮﺑﻲ درﻳﺎي ﺧﺰر ﻣﺠﺮي : : ﺷﻬﺮام ﻋﺒﺪاﻟﻤﻠﻜﻲ ﺷﻤﺎره ﺛﺒﺖ 43144 وزارت ﺟﻬﺎد ﻛﺸﺎورزي ﺳﺎزﻣﺎن ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎت، آﻣﻮزش و ﺗﺮوﻳﭻ ﻛﺸﺎورزي ﻣﻮﺳﺴﻪ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎت ﻋﻠﻮم ﺷﻴﻼﺗﻲ ﻛﺸﻮر ﻋﻨﻮان ﭘﺮوژه : ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎت ﺻﻴﺪ و ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ذﺧﺎﻳﺮ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺎن اﺳﺘﺨﻮاﻧﻲ در ﺣﻮﺿﻪ ﺟﻨﻮﺑﻲ درﻳﺎي ﺧﺰر ﺷﻤﺎره ﻣﺼﻮب ﭘﺮوژه : 89049 - 8903 -12 -12 -14 ﻧﺎ م و ﻧﺎم ﺧﺎﻧﻮادﮔﻲ ﻧﮕﺎرﻧﺪه / ﻧﮕﺎرﻧﺪﮔﺎن : ﺷﻬﺮام ﻋﺒﺪاﻟﻤﻠﻜﻲ ﻧﺎم و ﻧﺎم ﺧﺎﻧﻮادﮔﻲ ﻣﺠﺮي ﻣﺴﺌﻮل ( اﺧﺘﺼﺎص ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮوژه ﻫﺎ و ﻃﺮﺣﻬﺎي ﻣﻠﻲ و ﻣﺸﺘﺮك دارد ) : - - ﻧﺎم و ﻧﺎم ﺧﺎﻧﻮادﮔﻲ ﻣﺠﺮي / ﻣﺠﺮﻳﺎن : ﺷﻬﺮام ﻋﺒﺪاﻟﻤﻠﻜﻲ ﻧﺎم و ﻧﺎم ﺧﺎﻧﻮادﮔﻲ ﻫﻤﻜﺎر( ان ) : ﺳﻴﺪ اﻣﻴﻦ اﷲ ﺗﻘﻮي - ﻋﺒﺎﺳﻌﻠﻲ ﻣﻄﻠﺒﻲ – ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﺷﺮﻳﻒ روﺣﺎﻧﻲ – ﻣﺨﺘﺎر آﺧﻮﻧﺪي – ﺳﻴﺪ ﻋﺒﺎس ﻃﺎﻟﺐ زاده - ﺷﻬﺮام ﻗﺎﺳﻤﻲ - ﺣﺴﻦ ﻓﻀﻠﻲ - آرزو وﻫﺎب ﻧﮋاد – داود ﻏﻨﻲ ﻧﮋاد - داﻳﻮش ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ - ﻓﺮخ ﭘﺮاﻓﻜﻨﺪه - ﻣﺮاﺣﻢ رﺣﻤﺘﻲ - رﺿﺎ درﻳﺎﻧﺒﺮد - ﻏﻼﻣﻌﻠﻲ ﺑﻨﺪاﻧﻲ ﻧﺎم و ﻧﺎم ﺧﺎﻧﻮادﮔﻲ ﻣﺸﺎور( ان ) : - - ﻧﺎم و ﻧﺎم ﺧﺎﻧﻮادﮔﻲ ﻧﺎﻇﺮ( ان ) : ﻓﺮﻫﺎد ﻛﻴﻤﺮام ﻣﺤﻞ اﺟﺮا : اﺳﺘﺎن ﺗﻬﺮان ﺗﺎرﻳﺦ ﺷﺮوع : /1/5 89 ﻣﺪت اﺟﺮا : 2 ﺳﺎل و 3 ﻣﺎه ﻧﺎﺷﺮ : ﻣﻮﺳﺴﻪ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎت ﻋﻠﻮم ﺷﻴﻼﺗﻲ ﻛﺸﻮر ﺗﺎرﻳﺦ اﻧﺘﺸﺎر : ﺳﺎل1393 ﺣﻖ ﭼﺎپ ﺑﺮاي ﻣﺆﻟﻒ ﻣﺤﻔﻮظ اﺳﺖ .
    [Show full text]
  • IN BOSNIA and HERZEGOVINA June 2008
    RESULTS FROM THE EU BIODIVERSITY STANDARDS SCIENTIFIC COORDINATION GROUP (HD WG) IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA June 2008 RESULTS FROM THE EU BIODIVERSITY STANDARDS SCIENTIFIC COORDINATION GROUP (HD WG) IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 30th June 2008 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 4 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON BIH.................................................................. 5 3 IDENTIFIED SOURCES OF INFORMATION ............................................................. 8 3-a Relevant institutions.......................................................................................................................................8 3-b Experts.............................................................................................................................................................9 3-c Relevant scientific publications ...................................................................................................................10 3-c-i) Birds...........................................................................................................................................................10 3-c-ii) Fish ........................................................................................................................................................12 3-c-iii) Mammals ...............................................................................................................................................12 3-c-iv)
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Freshwater Fishes of the Genus Capoeta (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae) in Iran
    Received: 3 May 2016 | Revised: 8 August 2016 | Accepted: 9 August 2016 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2411 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Phylogenetic relationships of freshwater fishes of the genus Capoeta (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae) in Iran Hamid Reza Ghanavi | Elena G. Gonzalez | Ignacio Doadrio Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Biodiversity and Evolutionary Abstract Biology Department, CSIC, Madrid, Spain The Middle East contains a great diversity of Capoeta species, but their taxonomy re- Correspondence mains poorly described. We used mitochondrial history to examine diversity of the Hamid Reza Ghanavi, Department of algae- scraping cyprinid Capoeta in Iran, applying the species- delimiting approaches Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. Email: [email protected] General Mixed Yule- Coalescent (GMYC) and Poisson Tree Process (PTP) as well as haplotype network analyses. Using the BEAST program, we also examined temporal divergence patterns of Capoeta. The monophyly of the genus and the existence of three previously described main clades (Mesopotamian, Anatolian- Iranian, and Aralo- Caspian) were confirmed. However, the phylogeny proposed novel taxonomic findings within Capoeta. Results of GMYC, bPTP, and phylogenetic analyses were similar and suggested that species diversity in Iran is currently underestimated. At least four can- didate species, Capoeta sp4, Capoeta sp5, Capoeta sp6, and Capoeta sp7, are awaiting description. Capoeta capoeta comprises a species complex with distinct genetic line- ages. The divergence times of the three main Capoeta clades are estimated to have occurred around 15.6–12.4 Mya, consistent with a Mio- Pleistocene origin of the di- versity of Capoeta in Iran. The changes in Caspian Sea levels associated with climate fluctuations and geomorphological events such as the uplift of the Zagros and Alborz Mountains may account for the complex speciation patterns in Capoeta in Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 249 1 PB.Pdf
    A revised generic classification for Aloe (Xanthorrhoeaceae subfam. Asphodeloideae) Grace, Olwen Megan; Klopper, Ronell R.; Smith, Gideon F. ; Crouch, Neil R.; Figueiredo, Estrela; Rønsted, Nina; van Wyk, Abraham E. Published in: Phytotaxa DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.76.1.2 Publication date: 2013 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Grace, O. M., Klopper, R. R., Smith, G. F., Crouch, N. R., Figueiredo, E., Rønsted, N., & van Wyk, A. E. (2013). A revised generic classification for Aloe (Xanthorrhoeaceae subfam. Asphodeloideae). Phytotaxa, 76(1), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.76.1.2 Download date: 28. sep.. 2021 Phytotaxa 76 (1): 7–14 (2013) ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.76.1.2 A revised generic classification for Aloe (Xanthorrhoeaceae subfam. Asphodeloideae) OLWEN M. GRACE1,2, RONELL R. KLOPPER3,4, GIDEON F. SMITH3,4,5, NEIL R. CROUCH6,7, ESTRELA FIGUEIREDO5,8, NINA RØNSTED2 & ABRAHAM E. VAN WYK4 1Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey TW9 3DS, United Kingdom. Email: [email protected] 2Botanic Garden & Herbarium, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Sølvgade 83 Opg. S, DK1307-Copenhagen K, Denmark. Email: [email protected] 3Biosystematics Research and Biodiversity Collections Division, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001, South Africa. Email: [email protected]; [email protected] 4H.G.W.J. Schweickerdt Herbarium, Department of Plant Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex I List of Species and Habitats
    Annex I List of species and habitats No. Appendix II species Gornja Gornja Ulog Other source and Neretva Neretva EIA notes Phase 1 EIA Phase 2 EIA 1. Canis lupus p 58, pp 59-62 p 58 p 52 Emerald – Standard Data Form 2. Ursus arctos (Ursidae) p 58, pp 59-62 p 58 p 52 Emerald – Standard Data Form 3. 1 Lutra lutra p 58 p 58 - 4. Euphydryas aurinia p 59-62 p 57 - Emerald – Standard Data Form 5. 2 Phengaris arion (Maculinea p 59-62 p 57 - arion) 6. Bombina variegata p 57 p 55 - Herpetoloska baza BHHU:ATRA Emerald – Standard Data Form 7. Hyla arborea - - - Herpetoloska baza BHHU:ATRA 8. Rana Dalmatina - - - Herpetoloska baza BHHU:ATRA 9. 3 Bufotes viridis - - - Herpetoloska baza BHHU:ATRA 10. Lacerta agilis p 57 p 55 - 11. Lacerta viridis p 57 p 55 - 12. Natrix tessellata p 57 p 55 - 13. Vipera ammodytes - - - Herpetoloska baza BHHU: ATRA 14. Zamenis longissimus (as - - - Herpetoloska baza Elaphe longissima) BHHU: ATRA 15. Coronella austriaca - - - Herpetoloska baza BHHU: ATRA 16. Algyroides nigropunctatus - - - Herpetoloska baza BHHU: ATRA 17. 4 Podarcis melisellensis - - - Herpetoloska baza BHHU: ATRA 18. Cerambyx cerdo pp 59-62 p 58 - Emerald – Standard Data Form 19. Anthus trivialis p 57 p 55 - (Motacillidae) 20. Carduelis cannabina p 57 p 55 - 21. Carduelis carduelis p 57 p 55 - 1 The description of fauna in the EIAs for species 1, 2 and 3 is based on the local hunting documentation, on species likely to be present in such habitats, and on a description of species mentioned in the project undertaken to establish the Emerald network in BIH.
    [Show full text]
  • The Caucasus Biodiversity Hotspot
    Russia Turkey The Caucasus Biodiversity Hotspot Because of the great diversity and rarity of their flora, the Caucasian nations have initiated a project to prepare a “Red Book” of endemic plants of the region in collaboration with the Missouri Botanical Garden and the World Members of the Russian Federation, including Adygeya, The Lesser Caucasus mountains and refugial Colchis flora Conservation Union (IUCN). Chechneya, Dagestan, Ingushetia, Kabardino-Balkaria, extend westward into Turkey. The Turkish portion of the Karachaevo-Cherkessia, North Ossetia, Krasnodarsky, and Caucasus contains about 2,500 species, with 210 national Stavropolsky Kray, occupy the North Caucasus. The region and 750 regional endemics. Salix rizeensis Güner & Ziel. The Caucasus region lies between the Black and Caspian contains 3,700 species, with ca. 280 national and ca. 1,300 (EN) [above] is found in pastures around Trabzone and Rize, Seas and is the meeting point of Europe and Asia. The Caucasian endemics. Mt. Bolshaja Khatipara [above] in the usually along streams, at 2,000-3,000 m elevation. region is well known from Greek mythology: the Argonauts Teberda Reserve is covered with snow during most of the Asteraceae is one of the largest families in the Caucasus. searched for the Golden Fleece there. According to the Bible, year. Grossheimia Crocus scharojanii Rupr. Mount Ararat was the resting place for Noah’s Ark. (Cetaurea) (VU) [left] occurs in many heleniodes (Boiss.) parts of the Caucasus Sosn. et Takht. (EN) and is especially [left] is named after abundant in Teberda. It the famous Russian comes into flower in late botanist Alexander summer. A.
    [Show full text]
  • Cilt 6, Sayı 2
    LIMNOFISH-Journal of Limnology and Freshwater Fisheries Research 6(2): 88-99 (2020) Trophic State Assessment of Brackish Bafa Lake (Turkey) Based on Community Structure of Zooplankton Atakan SUKATAR1 , Alperen ERTAS1* , İskender GÜLLE2 , İnci TUNEY KIZILKAYA1 1Ege University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, 35100 Bornova, İzmir, TURKEY 2Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Faculty of Science and Arts, Department of Biology, Burdur, TURKEY ABSTRACT ARTICLE INFO Zooplankton abundance and composition are one of the most important factors RESEARCH ARTICLE which affect the food web in aquatic ecosystems. The purpose of this study was to determine the water quality of Bafa Lake in Turkey, based on zooplankton Received : 25.01.2020 communities. As the study case, Bafa Lake is one of the biggest lake in Turkey, Revised : 15.03.2020 and the lake is quite rich in terms of biodiversity. Bafa Lake is the under effects Accepted : 15.04.2020 of domestic, agricultural and industrial wastes that accumulate and cause the deterioration of ecology in the lake by Büyük Menderes River. With this purpose, Published : 27.08.2020 8 sampling sites were determined and zooplankton samples were collected DOI:10.17216/LimnoFish.680070 monthly for two years. TSINRot index and various versions of diversity indices were used to determine the water quality and ecological status of Bafa Lake. To determine similarities between the stations, the stations were clustered by using * CORRESPONDING AUTHOR UPGMA based on zooplankton fauna. By applying Pearson Correlation, [email protected] correlations between the indices based on zooplankton fauna were assessed. With Phone : +90 506 586 37 92 the identification of collected zooplankton, a total of 73 taxa which belong to groups of Rotifera, Cladocera, Copepoda, and Meroplankton were detected.
    [Show full text]
  • The July 2020 Clashes on the Armenia-Azerbaijan Border And
    INSTITUTE FOR SECURITY POLICY (ISP) WORKING PAPER THE JULY 2020 CLASHES ON THE ARMENIA – AZERBAIJAN BORDER AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE OLD CONFLICT by Vasif HUSEYNOV Center of Analysis of International Relations VIENNA 2020 The COVID-19 pandemic: impact for the post-Soviet space and Russia’s aspirations TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 3 II. THE JULY CLASHES .......................................................................................................... 7 III. REACTION OF EXTERNAL POWERS ............................................................................. 12 IV. NEW DIMENSIONS OF THE OLD CONFLICT ................................................................. 17 V. CONCLUDING REMARKS ............................................................................................... 19 1 ABOUT THE AUTHOR Dr. Vasif Huseynov studied International Relations, Political Economy, and Political Science in Baku, Kassel, and Göttingen. Since 2018, he has been a Research Fellow at the Centre for Strategic Studies, Lecturer in Politics at the Khazar University at Baku and Senior Advisor at the Center of Analysis of International Relations. His articles have appeared in, among other outlets, Caucasus International, CES Working Papers, and Eastern Journal of European Studies. Author of the book “Geopolitical Rivalries in the ‘Common Neighborhood’: Russia’s Conflict with the West, Soft Power, and Neoclassical Realism”. 2 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Slender-Horned Gazelle Gazella Leptoceros Conservation Strategy 2020-2029
    Slender-horned Gazelle Gazella leptoceros Conservation Strategy 2020-2029 Slender-horned Gazelle (Gazella leptoceros) Slender-horned Gazelle (:Conservation Strategy 2020-2029 Gazella leptoceros ) :Conservation Strategy 2020-2029 Conservation Strategy for the Slender-horned Gazelle Conservation Strategy for the Slender-horned Conservation Strategy for the Slender-horned The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of any participating organisation concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN or other participating organisations. Compiled and edited by David Mallon, Violeta Barrios and Helen Senn Contributors Teresa Abaígar, Abdelkader Benkheira, Roseline Beudels-Jamar, Koen De Smet, Husam Elalqamy, Adam Eyres, Amina Fellous-Djardini, Héla Guidara-Salman, Sander Hofman, Abdelkader Jebali, Ilham Kabouya-Loucif, Maher Mahjoub, Renata Molcanova, Catherine Numa, Marie Petretto, Brigid Randle, Tim Wacher Published by IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group and Royal Zoological Society of Scotland, Edinburgh, United Kingdom Copyright ©2020 IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Recommended citation IUCN SSC ASG and RZSS. 2020. Slender-horned Gazelle (Gazella leptoceros): Conservation strategy 2020-2029. IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group and Royal Zoological Society of Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis for the Caspian Sea
    TRANSBOUNDARY DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS FOR THE CASPIAN SEA Volume Two THE CASPIAN ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME BAKU, AZERBAIJAN September 2002 Caspian Environment Programme Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis Table of Contents Volume Two 1.0 THE CASPIAN SEA AND ITS SOCIAL, ECONOMIC AND LEGAL SETTINGS ..... 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PHYSICAL AND BIOGEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CASPIAN SEA ...................... 3 1.3 SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND DEVELOPMENT SETTING .............................................................. 23 1.4 LEGAL AND REGULATORY SETTING .................................................................................. 39 2.0 MAJOR TRANSBOUNDARY PERCEIVED PROBLEMS AND ISSUES .................... 50 2.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 50 2.2 STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS ................................................................................................ 51 2.3 DECLINE IN CERTAIN COMMERCIAL FISH STOCKS, INCLUDING STURGEON: STRONGLY TRANSBOUNDARY. ............................................................................................................ 59 2.4 DEGRADATION OF COASTAL LANDSCAPES AND DAMAGE TO COASTAL HABITATS: STRONGLY TRANSBOUNDARY. ........................................................................................... 69 2.5 THREATS TO BIODIVERSITY: STRONGLY TRANSBOUNDARY. .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Energy-Maintenance Strategy of Goitered Gazelles Gazella Subgutturosa During Rut
    Behavioural Processes 103 (2014) 5–8 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Behavioural Processes jou rnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/behavproc Short report The energy-maintenance strategy of goitered gazelles Gazella subgutturosa during rut a b a a,∗ a a Xia Canjun , Liu Wei , Xu Wenxuan , Yang Weikang , Xu Feng , David Blank a Key Laboratory of Biogeography and Bioresource in Arid Land, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China b College of Life Science and Technology, Southwest University for Nationalities, Chengdu 610043, China a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: In many polygynous ruminant species, males decrease their food intake considerably during the rut. Received 2 April 2013 To explain this phenomenon of rut-reduced hypophagia, two main hypotheses, the Foraging-Constraint Received in revised form 28 October 2013 Hypothesis and Energy-Saving Hypothesis, have been proposed. In our research, we assessed the behav- Accepted 28 October 2013 ioral strategy of goitered gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa) through the rutting period. According to our findings, male goitered gazelles spent less time feeding during the rut compared to pre- and post-rut Keywords: feeding times, but then maximized their energy intake during the rutting season when they were not Energy strategy engaged in rut-related behaviors. Females, in contrast, did not change their time budgets across the Feeding Lying different stages of the rut. Therefore, rut-induced hypophagia is mainly arising from the constraints Rut-related of rut-related behaviors for male goitered gazelles, so that the Foraging-Constraint Hypothesis better explains their strategy during rut.
    [Show full text]