1,2,3-6 Canonmills Bridge

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1,2,3-6 Canonmills Bridge 1 • EDINBVRGH. Itemno 10 THE CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL Report no Planning Permission 09/00830/FUL at 1, 2, 3 - 6 Canonmills Bridge Edinburgh EH35LF Development Management Sub-Committee of the Planning Committee 27 October 2010 Previous Committee This application was previously considered by Committee on 27.10.2010 Outcome of previous Committee Site visit - This application was continued by the Committee for a site visit. This site visit has now taken place and the application is returning to Committee for a decision. 1 Purpose of report To consider application 09/00830/FUL, submitted by Glovart Holdings Ltd .. The application is for: Erect mixed use, development of 2 restaurants, 6 flats and 3 town houses It is recommended that this application be GRANTED subject to the conditions below. 2 2 The Site and the Proposal Site description The application site is a triangular piece of land currently occupied by a two storey building with a pitched roof. The units on the site include restaurants and retail units. The lower level is used as storage/ancillary space for these commercial units. There is a change in site levels of approximately two metres as the ground falls from Brandon Terrace along Warriston Road. This means that only one storey is visible from the front elevation. To the rear of the site is an area used for car parking and services. The application site is surrounding by preomindantly residential properties with a mix of heights including 3 and 4 storey traditional Victorian tenements with pitched, slate roofs. The Water of Leith is immediately adjacent to the site on the northern and western boundaries. This property is located within the Inverleith Conservation Area. Site History 15 October 2008 - Erect a four storey mixed use development with 2no, restaurants on the ground floor and 6no, flats above; 3no, five storey townhouses to the rear. (08/02603/FUL) - WITHDRAWN Pre-Application Process Detailed pre-application discussions were undertaken with the architects prior to the submission of the application. This resulted in a substantial reduction in the number of units and improvements to the design and materials. Description of the Proposal Scheme 2 The proposal is for an L shaped 4 storey building for a mixed use development with 1 restaurant unit and 1 commercial unit at ground floor level fronting Canonmills and 6 residential flats above. Three town houses are proposed to the rear. The flats have 2 bedrooms and have windows facing onto Canonmills, Warriston Road with car parking area to the rear in a shared courtyard. At basement level, storage space is provided for the commercial units with refuse and bin stores for both the flats and commercial units. Bike storage is also provided. 3 To the rear of the main block 3 townhouses are proposed facing the Water of Leith to complete the 'L shape' of the proposal. Due to the difference in ground level these are at a lower height as the flatled block. The units have 3 bedrooms with balconies facing on the river and windows facing east to Warriston Road. Parking is provided at ground floor level in the form of integral garages accessed from Warriston Road. Solar panels are included in the design of the building to provide renewable energy, 8 are located on the main flatled block and 4 on the townhouses. Car parking is provided for the site to the rear of the building accessed from Warriston Road. Five spaces are proposed with three of these being integral garages for the townhouses. Space is available for delivery vehicles. The proposed materials are sandstone walling, white render finish, glass aluminum and timber The application is accompanied by a planning statement. Scheme 1 There are changes to the design of the elevations. Cycle parking was not included. 3. Officer's Assessment and Recommendation Determining Issues Do the proposals harm the character or appearance of the conservation area? If they do, there is a strong presumption against granting of permission. Do the proposals comply with the development plan? If the proposals do comply with the development plan, are there any compelling reasons for not approving them? If the proposals do not comply with the development plan, are there any compelling reasons for approving them? 4 ASSESSMENT To address these determining issues, the Committee needs to consider whether: (a) The principle of development is acceptable; (b) The proposal provides a development of appropriate design quality, scale and height that will preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the conservation area; (c) The proposal is appropriate, in scale and form, to the setting of the adjacent listed building. (d) The proposal addresses issues of sustainability (e) The proposal impacts on neighbouring residential amenity (f) The traffic and parking implications can be addressed satisfactorily (g) The flooding implications and archaeological issues can be addressed satisfactorily (a) The site lies within the urban area of Edinburgh City Local Plan where the principle of residential development is acceptable. Planning policy identifies the site within the urban area, which is predominantly residential in nature. The immediate surrounding area has a predominantly residential character. Planning permission has been granted for similar residential developments on this rear lane. Therefore, provided that the proposal accords with other local plan policies, the principle of the proposed development is acceptable. b) The proposed development comprises offour levels of accommodation. Commercial units will be located at ground floor level and three storeys of residential will be located above. The town houses are a storey lower than the main block. The site is located on the south eastern corner of Inverleith Conservation Area. The Inverleith Conservation Area Character Appraisal identifies the predominant character as one of large Victorian houses throughout and Georgian villas and terraces to the east of the area the street layout follows a loose grid pattern with some wide streets. The use of stone, timber and slates roofs is emphasised. This particular site sits at a prominent visual point where Brandon Terrace, Inverleith Row and Rodney Street meet. 5 The building to the east of the site is a corner building positioned on both Canonmills and Warriston Road is a category C(s) listed building (HB 30288 listed 15th September 1992) adjacent to this sits a more modern development residential development Canon Court also 4 storeys in height. Traditional tenement properties lie to the west. This new development therefore has to sit comfortably with adjacent, traditional development and modern development whilst still recognising it has to make an input into the preservation and enhancement of the conservation area. The building continues the building line of the existing development to the east. The proposal will create a faQade to terminate the vista along Brandon Terrace and form a gateway on approach from Inverleith Row. The proposal has been designed so that it is no higher than the traditional tenements to the east and existing modern developments to the north and east. It fits into and compliments the massing characteristics of the surrounding buildings area and retains the characteristics of the conservation area. The proposed roof is flat while the townhouses roof is sloping. The new windows facing south east are of a vertical style. The windows to the north east are of a more modern design. The proposed elevations are broken up by different building materials of stone, render and glass giving in a vertical emphasis to the design. The use of stone will preserve and enhance the character and appearance of the conservation area. The materials proposed are a mix of traditional and contemporary materials include natural stone, glass, render, aluminium and timber. The use of natural stone is in keeping with the built environment of the surrounding conservation area. The majority of overshadowing will fall within the application site. The built form will lie to the north of existing properties on Warriston Road, therefore any overshadowing will be limited due to the size and configuration of the end elevation. The scale and design is appropriate to its surroundings and preserves and enhances the character and appearance of the conservation area. c) The scale, form and proposed materials of the development complements the historic character of the adjacent C(s) listed building at 32 Canonmills (LB 30288, Listed 15th September 1992). The proposal will have no adverse impact and preserves the setting of the listed building. d) The proposal incorporates solar panels to provide renewable energy. Eight will be located on the main flatted block and four on the town houses. The solar panels are angled at 20 degrees to ensure optimum efficiency. The townhouses also have 'winter gardens' on the top storey which will act as additional insulation. A single bin store will be located under the main block of flats for use by all residents. The store will contain bins for recycling and a separate bin store will be provided for trade waste. 6 The proposal is satisfactory in terms of sustainability. e) The flatted properties have been designed so that the windows face up Brandon Terrace, onto the Water of Leith or into courtyard area to the rear. The windows facing on to the properties on Warriston Road lie approx 16 metres window to window distance. This represents a minor infringement of the guidelines which would be considered acceptable where development is proposed in a historic built environment, effectively a gable as opposed to an entire elevation. The town houses face into the shared courtyard area and onto the Water of Leith. There are no privacy issues. The Council's guidelines on Oaylighting, Sunlight and Privacy recognises that in tenement areas where infill development is proposed, such as this the new building, it should be designed so that the eaves roof form is no greater in height then the adjacent residential buildings.
Recommended publications
  • The Public Washhouses of Edinburgh
    THE PUBLIC WASHHOUSES OF EDINBURGH STEVEN ROBB HE AUTHOR’S INTEREST in public in\ uenza, typhus, respiratory diseases and vermin Twashhouses began whilst researching Ebenezer (bugs, lice, rats and mice) were also part of the MacRae’s twentyone-year spell as Edinburgh’s City wider sanitary conditions experienced by the poor in Architect, and his great-uncle George Clark Robb overcrowded urban areas. Conditions for the spread (1903-1980), who worked under MacRae for a decade of disease were exacerbated by inadequate drainage and was assistant architect for the Union Street and sewerage, and a woeful attempt to collect refuse.1 public washhouse. Consideration of the construction The subsequent accumulation of [ lth (excrement, drawings for the washhouse, which the author’s both human and animal), was exacerbated by urban family had retained, spurred him to investigate the slaughterhouses and the habit of keeping animals in building type further. It is useful to consider the place close proximity to dwellings and shops. Besides this of the public washhouse in Edinburgh’s history. This the poor often had a bad diet and a heavy reliance is especially true as, at the time of writing, only four on alcohol, the latter perhaps understandable in of the thirteen former washhouse buildings survive: their circumstances. two are likely to be lost imminently, and the long- These living conditions led to high levels of term use of one of the remaining examples is coming infant mortality, alongside the death rate, a standard to an end. favoured measure of the health of a community. Those that lived adjacent to the open sewers or those families in one or two roomed houses were PUBLIC HEALTH especially vulnerable.2 In the Old Town of Edinburgh a large migrant population lived in one or two room houses with up to 15 people sharing a single room.
    [Show full text]
  • 210627 Edinburgh Park Vaccination
    Queensferry Road CITY CENTRE Frederick Queen Hanover Street York Place Street Street Queensferry New Town Castle Street 8 Edinburgh19 Bus Services89 to50 Edinburgh Park Vaccination Centre Street YD Bus Station Palmerston Place 1 Charlotte St. 29 George Street Andrew t Square Square e re Airlink 100 St Airlink 100 drop off Airlink 100 ith drop off City e Direct Services to71 Edinburgh Park Vaccinationa Centre YY L West PF p Centre SC 47 p terminus Waterloo r 7 End PRINCES o 88 STREET Service 2 Service 36 x Bridge North Place Western 74 57 i 21 m 63 Airlink 100 SD a T dropup off to every 20 minutes up to every 30t minutes9 Scott Harbour e h 69 Lothian Road Lothian 5 Monument Princes Street e Waverley HB 92 m L 22 36 W. Maitland Airlink 100 Station Granton ow Granton Ro 18 Street Gardens in e r ad Service 12 to Airport Skylink 300 u M oa t o R d Ocean Terminal e u n HH w Market Street o upHaymarket to every 30 minutes up to every hour a n t 40 Edinburgh lk d 46 ra n a t G p Castle es G Newhaven 55 k W p r a r Bridge IV George n o (Gyle Centre journeys only) n AirlinkService 100 i 21 x Skylink 400 34 51 im Pilton t L 79 o to Airport at Esplanade 59 Morrisone Street High Street n P n 5 Bridge South 3 m lk up to every 30 minutesinute wa up to every 30 minutes e R o J 28 e n o s o i h c Muirhouse a n n r s a 78 t y d r o r ad EICC Usher Hall n Te r w y Ro o Old Town Old Town err Service 22 e F Leith ll M 30 48 73 & Royal Mile Filmhouse Silverknowes R 21 o In up to every 12 minutes 16 a d v Grassmarket d 84 ry Roa e P Fer r i l lr e ig it h S 4
    [Show full text]
  • PLACES of ENTERTAINMENT in EDINBURGH Part 5
    PLACES OF ENTERTAINMENT IN EDINBURGH Part 5 MORNINGSIDE, CRAIGLOCKHART, GORGIE AND DALRY, CORSTORPHINE AND MURRAYFIELD, PILTON, STOCKBRIDGE AND CANONMILLS, ABBEYHILL AND PIERSHILL, DUDDINGSTON, CRAIGMILLAR. ARE CIRCUSES ON THE WAY OUT? Compiled from Edinburgh Theatres, Cinemas and Circuses 1820 – 1963 by George Baird 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS MORNINGSIDE 7 Cinemas: Springvalley Cinema, 12 Springvalley Gardens, 1931; the seven cinemas on the 12 Springvalley Gardens site, 1912 – 1931; The Dominion, Newbattle Terrace, 1938. Theatre: The Church Hill Theatre; decision taken by Edinburgh Town Council in 1963 to convert the former Morningside High Church to a 440 seat theatre. CRAIGLOCKHART 11 Skating and Curling: Craiglockhart Safety Ponds, 1881 and 1935. GORGIE AND DALRY 12 Cinemas: Gorgie Entertainments, Tynecastle Parish Church, 1905; Haymarket Picture House, 90 Dalry Road, 1912 – became Scotia, 1949; Tivoli Picture House, 52 Gorgie Road, 1913 – became New Tivoli Cinema, 1934; Lyceum Cinema, Slateford Road, 1926; Poole’s Roxy, Gorgie Road, 1937. Circus: ‘Buffalo Bill’, Col. Wm. Frederick Cody, Gorgie Road, near Gorgie Station, 1904. Ice Rink: Edinburgh Ice Rink, 53 Haymarket Terrace, 1912. MURRAYFIELD AND CORSTORPHINE 27 Cinema: Astoria, Manse Road, 1930. Circuses: Bertram Mills’, Murrayfield, 1932 and 1938. Roller Skating Rink: American Roller Skating Rink, 1908. Ice Rink: Murrayfield Ice Rink; scheme sanctioned 1938; due to open in September 1939 but building was requisitioned by the Government from 1939 to 1951; opened in 1952. PILTON 39 Cinema: Embassy, Boswall Parkway, Pilton, 1937 3 STOCKBRIDGE AND CANONMILLS 40 St. Stephen Street Site: Anderson’s Ice Rink, opened about 1895;Tivoli Theatre opened on 11th November 1901;The Grand Theatre opened on 10th December 1904;Building used as a Riding Academy prior to the opening of the Grand Picture House on 31st December 1920;The Grand Cinema closed in 1960.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2021
    February 2021 No 303 SpurtleFind us at: www.broughtonspurtle.org.uk Tel: 07455 770474 [email protected] BROUGHTON’S INDEPENDENT STIRRER Free BANK TO QUIT PICARDY PLACE LIDDALL GOES A LONG WAY The Bank of Scotland’s Greenside branch at 6 Picardy Place will close on 26 April 2021. BoS says that even before the national Lockdown, personal customers were turning to Internet and Telephone Banking, other branches, and the Post Office instead. Although personal and business usages here are above that of a typical BoS branch, by 14% and 7% respectively, transactions had fallen in the year to March 2020 (see panel). BoS says its decision followed an impact analysis which covered customer choices, alternative branches, public transport, and the effect ‘on our customers including those who may need additional support’. The nearest alternative branches will be at 300 Lawnmarket, which is about a 20-minute walk for an able-bodied person; and 75 George Street, which is slightly further away but can be reached on foot in 15 minutes. You’re likely to see a lot of Ben Liddall over The cashpoint machines will also close, with free-to-use alternatives coming weeks. He aims to run 1,042 miles available at Lifestyle Express on Broughton Street, the Omni Centre, and over 100 days between 1 January and 10 April the ex-Royal Bank of Scotland on Blenheim Place. to raise money for the My Name’5 Doddie These details have been drawn from Part 1 of the Branch Review [bit. Foundaon and MND Scotland. The 17‐year‐old ly/35Fvx2U].
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Meeting and Agenda Planning Committee 10.00 Am
    Notice of meeting and agenda Planning Committee 10.00 am, Thursday, 12 June 2014 Council Chamber, City Chambers, High Street, Edinburgh This is a public meeting and members of the public are welcome to attend. Contact E-mail: Stephen Broughton Tel: 0131 529 4261 1. Order of business 1.1 Including any notices of motion and any other items of business submitted as urgent for consideration at the meeting. 2. Declaration of interests 2.1 Members should declare any financial and non-financial interests they have in the items of business for consideration, identifying the relevant agenda item and the nature of their interest. 3. Deputations 3.1 (If any) 4. Minutes 4.1 Planning Committee of 15 May 2014 (circulated – submitted for approval as a correct record). 4.2 Development Management Sub-Committee of 14 and 28 May 2014 (circulated – submitted for approval as correct records). 4.3 City of Edinburgh Planning Local Review Body of 7 and 21 May 2014 (circulated) (for noting) 5. Development Plan 5.1 Local Development Plan: Second Proposed Plan – report by the Acting Director of Services for Communities (circulated) Note: Copies of the background papers listed in the report have been made available for inspection in the party group rooms and to members of the public by contacting Stephen Broughton, Committee Services, City of Edinburgh Council, Waverley Court, Business Centre 2.1, 4 East Market Street Edinburgh EH8 8BG, Tel 0131 529 4261, e-mail [email protected] 6. Planning Process 6.1 Planning and Building Standards – Management Review – report by the Acting Director of Services for Communities (circulated) Carol Campbell Head of Legal, Risk and Compliance Committee Members Councillors Perry (Convener), Howat (Vice-Convener), Bagshaw, Blacklock, Brock Cairns, Child, Dixon, Heslop, McVey, Milligan, Mowat, Robson, Rose and Ross.
    [Show full text]
  • Portobello Client: City of Edinburgh Council | Produced By: Here+Now C.I.C
    PUBLIC LIFE STREET ASSESSMENT PORTOBELLO CLIENT: CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL | PRODUCED BY: HERE+NOW C.I.C. | MAY 2016 Report produced by: HERE+NOW C.I.C. Research data collected January-February 2016. Research analysis conducted February - May 2016. Report presented to the City of Edinburgh Council in May / June 2016. HERE+NOW is an Edinburgh-based landscape architecture studio specialised in co-design and user-centred research. www.thehereandnow.org.uk Client: The City of Edinburgh Council Project: Public Life Street Assessments, Lot Two - Portobello. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 ANALYSIS 12 OVERVIEW 14 KEY LOCATIONS 64 DESIGN RESPONSES 124 HERE+NOW’S 12 DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR HEALTHY PUBLIC SPACES 126 PRECEDENTS 128 KEY STRATEGIES 134 WHAT IMPROVEMENTS MIGHT BENEFIT THE TOWN CENTRE? 136 CONCLUSION 158 APPENDIX 164 METHODOLOGY 166 FULL ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS 184 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION This report comprises part of the second of two and its current level and diversity of public life. observation and research ‘on the street’ through larger studies investigating the public life of five town This research methodology could be repeated in to analysis and design responses - ensures the centres and streets in Edinburgh. This research and the future following any improvement works or richest capturing and analysis of data, and the report has been compiled by HERE+NOW on behalf changes to the area to give a post-evaluation study transformation of this detailed information into of The City of Edinburgh Council. for comparison. the identification of key opportunities and potential design responses for these complex and interesting The report presented here relates specifically to These Public Life Street Assessments deliberately places.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Terminal • Leith • Canonmills • Stockbridge • Tollcross • Morningside • Sighthill • Gyle
    service 36 at a glance... frequency During the day During the day Monday to Friday Saturday & Sunday every every 20 30 mins mins City Centre bus stops Whilst we’ve taken every effort in the preparation of this guide, Lothian Buses Ltd cannot accept any liability arising from inaccuracies, amendments or changes. The routes and times shown are for guidance – we would advise customers to check details by calling 0131 555 6363 before travelling. On occasion due to circumstances beyond our control and during special events, our services can be delayed by traffic congestion and diversion. See previous page for City Centre bus stops 36 Route: Ocean Terminal, Ocean Drive, Commercial Street, The Shore, Henderson Street, Great Junction Street, Bonnington Road, Broughton Road, Eyre Place, Henderson Row, Hamilton Place, Deanhaugh Street, Leslie Place, St. Bernards Crescent, Dean Park Crescent, Queensferry Road, Randolph Cliff, Queensferry Street, Hope Street, Charlotte Square, South Charlotte Street, Princes Street, Lothian Road, Earl Grey Street, Home Street, Leven Street, Barclay Place, Bruntsfield Place, Morningside Road, Morningside Drive, Morningside Grove, Glenlockhart Road, Craiglockhart Avenue, Lanark Road, Inglis Green Road, Longstone Road, Calder Road, Bankhead Avenue, Bankhead Crossway North, Bankhead Drive, Cutlins Road, Lochside Avenue, Lochside Crescent, Edinburgh Park, Gyle Avenue, Gyle Centre. Return via above route reversed to Cutlins Road, Bankhead Drive, Bankhead Broadway to Bankhead Crossway North then as outward route reversed
    [Show full text]
  • Transport and Environment Committee
    Transport and Environment Committee 10.00am, Thursday, 28 January 2021 Spaces for People Update – January 2021 Executive/routine Executive Wards 1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 17 Council Commitments 1. Recommendations 1.1 Transport and Environment Committee is asked to: 1.1.1 note this update on the Spaces for People (SfP) programme; 1.1.2 approve the schemes noted in paragraphs 4.3 and 4.4 (and in Appendix 2); 1.1.3 approve the recommendations set out in Appendix 1; 1.1.4 note the intention to review the current measures to determine if it would be beneficial to retain or adapt them to support the Council’s wider strategic objectives. The arrangements for doing so are set out in paragraphs 4.30 – 4.33 and in Appendix 3 and it is intended to update Committee on this in April 2021; 1.1.5 note the schedule of proposed measures near schools in Appendix 4; and 1.1.6 agree the funding allocation described in section 6. Paul Lawrence Executive Director of Place Contact: Dave Sinclair, Local Transport and Environment Manager E-mail: [email protected] | Tel: 0131 529 7075 Report Spaces for People Update – January 2021 2. Executive Summary 2.1 This report provides an update on Spaces for People (SfP) measures implemented over the last eight months, seeks approval for changes to existing schemes and recommends the introduction or development of new schemes. 2.2 The report sets out a process to assess the benefit of retaining or adapting existing measures where these align to the Council’s wider strategic priorities, utilising the appropriate legal powers.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pious Child
    CHAPTER ONE A Pious Child AS he reeled and fell, his Samoan boy Sosimo caught him and carried the featherweight body into the big room at Vailima, the plantation house paid for by Louisʹs wealth as a best‐selling author. There he lay unconscious in the green leather chair as they chafed his feet and put them in hot water in vain hope of reviving him. But his body now seemed beyond sensation. If hearing, the last sense to go, detected his step‐daughter Belleʹs anxious comments on the strength of his pulse, he could no longer respond. Nor could he detect the scent of the gardenias, born in across the verandah on the night air when the doctor ordered the windows to be flung open. The Samoan servants, creeping in silently, one by one as the big lamps were lit, had gathered in a half‐circle around the dying man who had now been lifted onto a little brass bed1. Beside him sat his wife, who had shared all his great adventures but could not accompany him on this last voyage. Nearby, supported by the Christian presence of Mr Clarke the missionary, his widowed mother bowed her head in prayer. After 44 years of worry about his health, Maggie Stevenson now knew it was all over for her Lou. Alone at 65, she would be the last of the loving family that once lived in Heriot Row. Her anguish now recalled her suffering when on November 13th, 1850, Robert Lewis Balfour Stevenson was born. IT had been a bad birth for the slender daughter of the Manse.
    [Show full text]
  • You Can View Our Zone 8 Stats Report Here
    New Town/ Stockbridge/Comely Bank West End City Centre Murrayfield & Corstorphine Southside Trinity/Inverleith/Canonmills Slateford/Gorgie/Dalry Zone 8 Leith/Shore/Granton < East Lothian Glasgow matching the right property to the right people www.murrayandcurrie.com MURRAY & CURRIE MONTHLY DETAILED MARKET ANALYSIS CONFIRMS AND SUPPORTS OUR CLAIM AS EDINBURGH’S MOST SUCCESSFUL AND RESULTS FOCUSED RESIDENTIAL AGENT Murray & Currie - New Tenant Profile Murray & Currie - Rentals Secured by Property Size Professional Student Local Housing 5 Bedroom 4 Bedroom 4% Student 8% 12% 1 Bedroom Local Housing 6% 31% 3 Bedroom 16% Professional 86% 2 Bedroom 37% Murray & Currie Database Growth 2012 200 180 160 - £0 - £599 per month 140 120 - £600 - £999 per month 100 80 - £1000 - £1999 per month 60 - £2000+ per month 40 20 0 Jan 12 Feb 12 Mar 12 Apr 12 May 12 Jun 12 Jul 12 Aug 12 Sep 12 Oct 12 Nov 12 Dec 12 Murray & Currie Average Rentals Secured 2012 £3,000 £2,500 5 Bed £2,000 4 Bed £1,500 3 Bed 2 Bed £1,000 1 Bed £500 £0 Jan 12 Feb 12 Mar 12 Apr 12 May 12 Jun 12 Jul 12 Aug 12 Sep 12 Oct 12 Nov 12 Dec 12 Y PARKWA OSWALL WAY B LL PARK BOSWA G ZONE 8 R G B A AD R O O N R E RRY A S T FE T W O JU N A N L C R L T O E I VENU D O A P TON A IL R N P I L D C I V S T R T O E R E E W N AD E RO T E Y D ERR W F R R A O I D V R A A R E O I R D S T N N O O N AD E T Y RO N W H O R D FER G U R H U R O K O A R E T B S K A V T ONT PAR H E R CLAREM D N EE ACE T E PL OAD R ITAG RRY R D ZONE 8 ERM FE H EAST E A C D S A R E I T C N O D E A R ROA L V RRY W F P N FE E E H R
    [Show full text]
  • 8 at a Glance
    service 8 at a glance... frequency During the day During the day During the day During the Mon-Fri Saturday Sunday evening every every every every 12 15 20 30 mins mins mins mins City Centre bus stops See previous page for City Centre bus stops Buses 7, 21, 24, 33, 38, 49 & 400 also serve the Royal Infirmary – see separate timetable leaflets for details. Whilst we’ve taken every effort in the preparation of this guide, Lothian Buses Ltd cannot accept any liability arising from inaccuracies, amendments or changes. The routes and times shown are for guidance – we would advise customers to check details by calling 0131 555 6363 before travelling. On occasion due to circumstances beyond our control and during special events, our services can be delayed by traffic congestion and diversion. 8 Muirhouse • Pilton • City Centre • Cameron Toll • Moredun • Royal Infirmary Muirhouse 0435 0505 0530 0545 0600 0615 0630 0642 0654 0704 0714 0724 0734 0744 0754 0804 0817 0831 0845 Pilton Drive North 0439 0509 0534 0549 0604 0619 0634 0646 0658 0708 0718 0728 0738 0749 0759 0809 0822 0836 0850 Canonmills 0449 0519 0544 0559 0614 0629 0644 0658 0710 0720 0730 0742 0752 0804 0814 0824 0837 0851 0905 Bellevue Crescent 0451 0521 0546 0601 0616 0631 0646 0700 0712 0722 0733 0745 0755 0807 0817 0827 0840 0854 0908 North Bridge 0456 0526 0551 0606 0621 0636 0652 0706 0718 0728 0740 0752 0803 0815 0825 0835 0848 0902 0916 Monday to Friday to Monday Cameron Toll, Lady Road U U 0600 0615 0630 0645 0703 0717 0729 0740 0753 0806 0817 0829 0839 0849 0902 0916 0931 Royal
    [Show full text]
  • Here (Through Accident Or Design); at Least a Solitary Mill Stone Still Survives
    The Community Council represents the views of local residents to Edinburgh City Council From : Richard Price – NTBCC Planning Convenor 2 Bellevue Terrace Edinburgh EH7 4DU 7th February 2018 Jennifer Zochowska, City of Edinburgh Council, Waverley Court, 4 East Market Street, Edinburgh EH8 8BG Dear Ms. Zochowska, 17/05967/FUL Change of use from commercial offices to a mixed use of residential and commercial. Partial demolition of existing building with retention of Canon Mill façade, erection of new building to accommodate 11no. new flats with ground floor commercial space. 1 - 3 Canon Street Edinburgh EH3 5HE Representation on behalf of the New Town & Broughton Community Council. The New Town & Broughton Community Council saw the proposal to essentially demolish the last remaining building associated with the history of milling along the water of Leith. The current building at 1 -3 Canon Street, Canonmills has clear historical significance. It is the last physical vestige of a history of milling in the area which goes back to the 12th century and stretches along the Water of Leith as far as the Dean Village, where (through accident or design); at least a solitary mill stone still survives. These mills give the area its name and even though this particular building on the corner of Canon Street and Eyre Place has suffered through its many changes over the last century, the façade of the main building still provides historic context and continues to add charm to this corner of the city and is cherished by many local residents. The Archaeology Assessment by the AOC Archaeology Group helpfully states that “the site has been occupied by a mill building from at least 1804”, and indeed ,” documentary and cartographic records indicate that the building may be of an earlier date and is potentially a medieval mill.” The building “is located in the southern section of Canon Mills,” which is documented as being “a flour mill in 1849” falling into disuse in 1893 and then subsequently redeveloped as a printing works in the early 20th century.
    [Show full text]