RP: Cambodia: Provincial Roads Improvement Project (314D, Cross-Border Facility, NR13)

Resettlement Plan

November 2011

CAM: Provincial Roads Improvement Project (314D, Cross-Border Facility, NR13)

Prepared by Ministry of Public Works and Transportfor the Asian Development Bank.

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB – Asian Development Bank BST – bituminous surface treatment DMS – detailed measurement survey EMO – External Monitoring Organization FGD – focus group discussion IOL – inventory of losses IRC – Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee M&E – monitoring and evaluation MEF – Ministry of Economy and Finance MPWT – Ministry of Public Works and Transport MRD – Ministry of Rural Development NR – National Road PDPWT – Provincial Department of Public Works and Transport PIB – public information brochure PMU – project management unit RCS – replacement cost study ROW – right of way RSCWG – resettlement sub-committee working group SES – socioeconomic survey SEU – social and environmental unit TA – Technical Assistance

NOTE

In this report, “$” refers to US dollars unless otherwise stated.

DEFINITION OF TERMS

Cut-off date – This refers to the date prior to which the occupation or use of the project area makes residents/users of the same eligible to be categorised as affectedpeople. Persons not covered in the census are not eligible for compensation and other entitlements, unless they can show proof that (i) they have been inadvertently missed out during the census and the inventory of losses (IOL); or (ii) they have lawfully acquired the affected assets following completion of the census and the IOL and prior to the conduct of the detailed measurement survey (DMS). Affected – In the context of involuntary resettlement, affectedpeople are those who are Household/ physically displaced (relocation, loss of residential land, or loss of shelter) AffectedPeople and/or economically affected (loss of land, assets, access to assets, income sources, or means of livelihood) as a result of (i) involuntary expropriation of land, or (ii) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated parks and protected areas. In the case of affected household, it includes all members residing under one roof and operating as a single economic unit, who are adversely affected by a project or any of its components. Detailed – This activity involves the finalization and/or validation of the results of the IOL, Measurement severity of impacts, and list of affected people earlier done during resettlement Survey plan preparation. The final cost of resettlement can be determined following completion of the DMS. Entitlement – Refers to a range of measures comprising compensation, income restoration support, transfer assistance, income substitution, relocation support, etc. which are due to the affected people, depending on the type and severity of their losses, to restore their economic and social base. Income – This is the re-establishment of sources of income and livelihood of the affected restoration households. Inventory of – This is the process where all fixed assets (i.e. lands used for residence, Losses commerce, agriculture, including ponds; dwelling units; stalls and shops; secondary structures, such as fences, tombs, wells; trees with commercial value; etc.) and sources of income and livelihood inside the Project right-of-way are identified, measured, their owners identified, their exact location pinpointed, and their replacement costs calculated. Additionally, the severity of impact to the affected assets and the severity of impact to the livelihood and productive capacity of affected people will be determined. Land acquisition – Refers to the process whereby an individual, household, firm or private institution is compelled by a public agency to alienate all or part of the land it owns or possesses to the ownership and possession of that agency for public purposes in return for compensation at replacement costs. Relocation – This is the physical relocation of a displaced people from her/his pre-project place of residence and/or business. Replacement Means the amount in cash or in kind needed to replace an asset in its existing Cost condition, without deduction of transaction costs or for any material salvaged, at prevailing market value, or its nearest equivalent, at the time of compensation payment. The replacement rates of affected assets as determined during the conduct of the replacement cost study (RCS) will be updated to reflect prevailing market values at the time of payment of compensation. Replacement – This refers to the process involved in determining replacement costs of affected Cost Study assets based on empirical data. Resettlement - This is a time-bound action plan with budget, setting out the resettlement Plan objectives and strategies, entitlements, activities and responsibilities, resettlement monitoring, and resettlement evaluation. Severely – This refers to affected households who will (i) lose 10% or more of their total affected productive land and/or assets, (ii) have to relocate; and/or (iii) lose 10% or more

households of their total income sources due to the Project. Vulnerable – These are distinct groups of people who might suffer disproportionately or face groups the risk of being further marginalized by the effects of resettlement and specifically include: (i) households headed by women with dependents, (ii) disabled household heads, (iii) households falling under the generally accepted indicator for poverty, (iv) children and the elderly households who are landless and with no other means of support, and (v) landless households,.

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... 1 A. Introduction ...... 1 B. Scope of Land Acquisition and Resettlement...... 1 C. Measures to Minimize Impacts and Resettlement ...... 2 D. Legal and Policy Framework ...... 2 E. Participation, Disclosure and Grievance Redress ...... 2 F. Vulnerability, and gender issues ...... 3 G. Implementation Arrangements ...... 3 H. Monitoring ...... 3 I. Resettlement Budget and Indicative Schedule of Resettlement Plan Implementation 3 II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...... 4 A. Project Background ...... 4 B. Description of 314D, CBF, and NR13 ...... 4 C. Civil Works to be undertaken ...... 6 D. Measures being adopted to Minimize Adverse Social Impacts ...... 6 III. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT ...... 8 A. Methodology Used In Determining Project Impacts ...... 8 B. Data Gathering Instrument ...... 8 C. The survey team ...... 9 D. Setting of the cut-off date for eligibility ...... 9 E. Replacement Cost Study (RCS) ...... 9 F. Affected fixed assets ...... 9 IV. SOCIO-ECONOMIC INFORMATION AND PROFILE ...... 25 A. Introduction ...... 25 B. Location and Type of Affected Assets of Sample AHs ...... 25 C. Demographic information on the Sample AHs ...... 27 D. Economic situation: income and expenses of the sample AHs ...... 31 E. Amenities of the sample AHs ...... 35 V. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION ...... 41 A. Participatory activities in RP Planning and Implementation ...... 41 B. Public consultations during RP preparation ...... 42 C. Disclosure of the Resettlement Plan ...... 44 D. Consultation and Information Disclosure during RP Implementation ...... 44 VI. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM ...... 45 VII. LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK ...... 46 A. Relevant Laws ...... 46

B. ADB Policies ...... 49 C. Coping with the Resettlement Policies of Funding Agencies ...... 51 VIII. ENTITLEMENTS, ASSISTANCE AND BENEFITS ...... 53 A. Objectives ...... 53 B. Key Principles ...... 53 C. Entitlements ...... 55 D. Strategy to address gender issues ...... 59 E. Strategy to assist vulnerable households ...... 59 F. Unforeseen Impacts ...... 59 IX. RELOCATION OF HOUSING AND SETTLEMENTS ...... 59 A. Relocation Strategy ...... 59 B. Temporary Impacts ...... 60 X. INCOME RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION ...... 60 A. General Provisions ...... 60 B. Loss of productive land ...... 61 C. Loss of Business Income ...... 61 XI. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING PLAN ...... 62 A. Procedures for flow of funds ...... 62 B. Cost estimates and inflation adjustment ...... Error! Bookmark not defined. C. Implementation, administration and contingency costs ...... 62 D. Estimated Costs of Resettlement ...... 62 XII. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS ...... 64 A. Environmental and Social Office ...... 64 B. IRC and the Resettlement Department ...... 64 C. Provincial Resettlement Sub-committee ...... 65 D. Project Supervision Consultants ...... 66 XIII. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ...... 66 A. RP Updating and Implementation ...... 66 B. Indicative implementation schedule of the RP ...... 67 XIV. MONITORING AND REPORTING ...... 67 A. Indicators for Internal monitoring ...... 67 B. External monitoring agency ...... 68

Appendixes Appendix 1.1: Mitigation Option 62 Appendix 2.1: Socioeconomic Survey Questionnaire 63 Appendix 2.2: Inventory of Losses 64 Appendix 2.3 Master List of affected people 71 Appendix 2.4 Estimated of compensation unit price 84 Appendix 2.5 Minutes of GD Meetings/Attendance 85 Appendix 2.6 Resettlement sites 89 Appendix 2.7 Project Information Booklet 90 Appendix 2.8 Terms of Reference Replacement Cost 94

List of Tables Table I.1 Indicative Resettlement Schedule 3 Table II.1 Districts and Communes Traversed by 314D 4 Table II.2 Districts and Communes Traversed by NR13 5 Table III.1 Occupied Right-of-Way Land According to Use (m2) 10 Table III.2 Land Losses (in m²) According to Gender of AH Heads 11 Table III.3. Location of Concentrated Commercial Areas in 314D 12 Table III.4. Location of Concentrated Commercial Areas in NR13 13 Table III.5 Number of Affected Main Structures According to Use 13 Table III.6 Affected Households with Affected House by Severity of Loss 14 Table III.7 Affected Households Losing House-Store by Severity 14 Table III.8 Affected Households with Affected Shops by Severity of Loss 15 Table III.9 Floor Area of Affected Houses by Construction Grade 314D 15 Table III.10 Floor Area of Affected Houses by Construction Grade NR13 16 Table III.11 Floor Area of House-stores by Construction Grade 314D 16 Table III.12 Floor Area of House-stores by Construction Grade NR13 16 Table III.13 Floor Area of Shops by Construction Grade 314D 17 Table III.14 Floor Area of Shops by Construction Grade NR13 17 Table III.15 Quantities of Affected Extended Eaves 18 Table III.16 Quantities of Fence 18 Table III.17 Assorted Secondary Structures 19 Table III.18 Affected Wells and Waiting Sheds NR13 19 Table III.19 Affected Electric and Communication Posts 20 Table III.20 Quantities of Affected Perennials 314D 20 Table III.21 Quantities of Affected Timber Trees 314D 21 Table III.22 Quantities of Affected Fruit and Timber Trees CBF 21 Table III.23 Quantities of Affected Perennials NR13 21 Table III.24 Quantities of Affected Timber Trees NR13 22

vii

Table III.25 Range of Net Monthly Income of Partially Affected Shops 314D 22 Table III.26 Range of Net Monthly Income of Entirely Affected Shops PR 314D 23 Table III.27 Range of Net Monthly Income of Partially Affected Shops NR13 23 Table III.28 Range of Net Monthly Income of Entirely Affected Shops NR13 24 Table IV.1 Affected Assets of Sample AHs 314D 25 Table IV.2 Affected Assets of Sample AHs NR13 26 Table IV.3 Years in Possession of Affected Main Structures 26 Table IV.4 Civil Status of Head of Sample AHs 314D 27 Table IV.5 Civil Status of Head of Sample AHs NR13 27 Table IV.6 Head of Sample AHs by Physical Condition and Age 314D 28 Table IV.7 Head of Sample AHs by Physical Condition and Age NR13 29 Table IV.8 Educational Attainment of Head of Sample AHs 314D 29 Table IV.9 Educational Attainment of Head of Sample AHs NR13 30 Table IV.10 Number of Persons in the Sample AHs 314D 31 Table IV.11 Number of Persons in the Sample AHs NR13 31 Table IV.12 Primary Sources of Income of Sample AH Heads 314D 31 Table IV.13 Combined Monthly Income of Sample AHs 314D 32 Table IV.14 Monthly Expenses of Sample AHs 314D 33 Table IV.15 Primary Sources of Income of Sample AHs NR13 33 Table IV.16 Combined Monthly Income of Sample AHs IR13 34 Table IV.17 Monthly Expenses of Sample AHs IR13 34 Table IV.18 Main Source of Potable Water of the AHs 314D 35 Table IV.19 Main Source of Water for Washing of the AHs 314D 35 Table IV.20 Toilet Facilities Used by the AHs 314D 36 Table IV.21 Bathing Facilities Used by the AHs 314D 36 Table IV.22 Garbage Disposal Used by the AHs 314D 36 Table IV.23 Main Source of Power for Lighting 314D 36 Table IV.24 Main Source of Fuel for Cooking 314D 37 Table IV.25 Household Appliances 314D 37 Table IV.26 Ownership of Transportation 314D 37 Table IV.27 Main Source of Potable Water of the AHs NR13 38 Table IV.28 Main Source of Water for Washing of the AHs NR13 38 Table IV.29 Toilet Facilities Used by the AHs NR13 38 Table IV.30 Bathing Facilities Used by the AHs NR13 39 Table IV.31 Garbage Disposal Used by the AHs NR13 39 Table IV.32 Main Source of Power for Lighting NR13 39 Table IV.33 Main Source of Fuel for Cooking NR13 40 Table IV.34 Household Appliances NR13 40 Table IV.35 Ownership of Transportation NR13 40 Table V.1 Roles and Responsibilities of Key Stakeholders in the RP 41 Table G-V.2 Dates of Pre-IOL Consultations 44

Table V.3 Dates of Post-IOL Consultations 44 Table VII.1 Resettlement Policy and Its Application in Cambodia 52 Table VIII.1 Entitlement Matrix 55 Table X.1 Loss of Land Use within Road Right of Way 61 Table X.2 Acquired Private Land at CBF 61 Table X.3 Income Loss Allowance 62 Table XI.1 Summary of Resettlement Costs (314D, CBF, NR13) 62 Table XIII.1 Indicative Schedule of Resettlement Activities 67

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

A. Introduction

1. The Government of Cambodia, through the Ministry of Public Works and Transport (MPWT), has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) for a project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project. The project aims to rehabilitate an aggregate of approximately 176 km of provincial road 314D, national road (NR) 13, 150B, NR53, and 151B, located in Prey Veng, Svay Rieng, Kampong Chhnang, and Kampong Speu provinces, to paved condition to provide a safer, cost-effective provincial road network with all-year access to markets and other social services for provincial centers of southeastern and mid-western Cambodia. The existing cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva will be expanded and developed to facilitate efficient cross border transport and trade between Cambodia and Vietnam. This resettlement plan is for 314D, the CBF, and NR13. (See Figure 1 for the project location map).

B. Scope of Land Acquisition and Resettlement

2. The major impacts caused by the project in the rehabilitation of 314D and NR13 include demolition of structures used for residence and business, and acquisition of occupied land in the road right-of-way (ROW). According to the inventory of losses (IOL) conducted in 20 May 2011 – 2 June 2011, around 697 households (215 in 314D and 482 in NR13) in 19 communes (7 in 314D and 12 in NR13) are affected by the loss of fixed assets and sources of incomes or livelihoods.1Forty-fivehouseholds in 314D and 108 households in NR13 are affected by impacts on their homes and house-and-shops, of which 20 households in 314D and 26 households in NR13 will lose entirely their homes and house-and-shops and will need to reconstruct behind the construction corridor. Moreover, 62 households in 314D and 114 households in NR13 are affected by impacts on their independent shops (i.e., detached from other buildings), of which 45 households in 314D and 57 households will have to relocate their business behind the construction corridor. In 314D, some 27,936 square meter (m2) of land in the ROW are used or occupied by private households (12,004 m2 for agriculture and 15,932 m2 for residence and business), while in NR13, around 47,398.3 m2 of land in the ROW are used or occupied by private households (44,681 m2 for agriculture and 2,717 m2 for residence and business). Other fixed structures affected include fences, concrete pavements, extended eaves, pipe culverts and sign boards. In addition, 96 electric and telecommunication posts (75 in 314D and 21 in NR13) need to be relocated behind the COI. Around 12,140 perennials and timber trees (2,234 in 314D and 9,906 in NR13) need to be removed from the COI.

3. In the expansion of the CBF at Prey Var, an aggregate of 24,945.12 m2 of private land will be acquired, in addition to twohouses and onestore with a combined floor area of 90 m2. Fifteenperennial and 583 timber trees owned by these private individuals will likewise be acquired. Twoabsentees (i.e., living abroad or in Phnom Penh) and onelanded local farmer own the affected plots of land. Twoother households have built structures on the land of twoof the landowners to oversee the properties. The existing CBF facilities are standing on a 10,982 m2 government land.

1 This number excludes the 14 houses and shops in 314D and the 44 houses and shops in NR13 whose owners could not be determined at the time of the IOL because said structures were unattended or locked.

C. Measures to Minimize Impacts and Resettlement

4. In order to avoid or minimize displacement of people from assets and livelihoods, the existing road alignment will be followed and construction works will be confined within a COI of 10 meters (m) measured either way from the road centerline. In addition, as part of the Project’s resettlement strategy, affected peoplewill be provided sufficient time to rebuild their homes and shops prior to the commencement of civil works and that they are able to continue with their present livelihood activities even during Project implementation. Also, all standing annual crops, including privately-owned trees, will be allowed to be harvested before the start of civil works in a particular section of the Project road. The MPWT, through its Project Management Unit (PMU) 3 and the Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee (IRC), through the Resettlement Department at the Ministry of Economy and Finance (RD-MEF), will ensure that this resettlement strategy is carried through diligently.

D. Legal and Policy Framework

5. This resettlement planhas been prepared to address land acquisition and resettlement in the rehabilitation of 314D and NR13, consistent with ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (June 2009) and relevant laws and regulations of the Royal Government of Cambodia, notably the 1993 Constitution, the 2001 Land Law, 2010 Expropriation Law, and Prakas (Government Order) No. 6, dated 27 September 1999. The resettlement plan includes the resettlement policy and specific time-bound and budgeted measures for mitigating the adverse social impacts of the Project, and for rehabilitating all physically and economically displaced persons.

6. The basic compensation and rehabilitation principles adopted in this resettlement plan are: (i) land acquisition is minimized if avoidance is not possible; (ii) compensation and cash and no-cash assistance will be provided to help ensure that affected persons are able to maintain, if not improve, their pre-Project living standards; (iii) affected persons are fully informed and consulted on compensation and relocation options; (iv) existing socio-cultural institutions of affected persons are supported and used; (v) the project resettlement policy will equally apply to women and men; (vi) lack of formal title will not be a bar to compensation and rehabilitation; (vii) particular attention will be extended to vulnerable groups, such as households headed by women and the elderly with no other social support; (viii) resettlement is planned and implemented as an integral part of the project and that the budget for resettlement is part of Project costs; and (ix) affected persons are not displaced from assets until they are fully compensated for the same.

E. Participation, Disclosure and Grievance Redress

7. Key information on the draft resettlement plan has been disclosed to the affected persons through the holding in June 2011 of public meetings to: (i) present the results of the IOL; (ii) discuss the salient points of the Project resettlement policy in general term; and (iii) find out from the affected persons their suggestions and preferences regarding compensation, allowances and assistance, relocation of structures, grievance redress and participation. A project information leaflet in Khmer will be distributed to the affected persons in the first half of September 2011. Likewise, during the first half of September 2011, the draft resettlement plan will be posted in provincial, district, and commune offices and on the ADB website. Following concurrence by ADB of the resettlement plan, the summary of the agreed resettlement plan will again be disclosed to the affected peoplewith its posting at local government offices, while the full text of the approved resettlement plan will be uploaded on the ADB website (www.adb.org). Social monitoring reports will be made available to the affected peopleand will be submitted to ADB for web posting.

2 3

8. In case of grievances, the affected persons will first lodge their complaint with the commune office. If within 15 days settlement could not be reached, the grievance would be elevated to the district office. If the same could still not be settled at the district level, the complaint would be lodged at the provincial office. A court of law is the final arbiter of complaints that are not settled at the local government levels.

F. Vulnerability, and gender issues

9. The IOL has provisionally identified 157 women-headed households, 86 affected householdsthat are headed by persons within the retirement age bracket of the Government (i.e., 60 years and older), 6 affected households that are headed by persons with disabilities, and 176 affected households living on very low incomes. Additional measures are incorporated in the resettlement plan to help ensure that these affected households, who are considered particularly vulnerable, are not further disadvantaged and that, along with the other affected households, they will equally benefit from the Project.

G. Implementation Arrangements

10. The MPWT, through PMU3 and the Social and Environmental Office (SEO), and the Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee (IRC), through the Resettlement Department of the Ministry of Economy and Finance (RD-MEF), are overall responsible for preparing, updating, implementing and financing the resettlement plan. At the local government level, the MPWT and IRC are assisted by Resettlement Subcommittee in the provinces and districts through the Resettlement Sub-committee Working Groups (RSWG).

H. Monitoring

11. The SEO is the Project’s internal monitor, while an external monitoring organization will be hired by IRC to do external monitoring and evaluation (M&E). During resettlement plan implementation, which is reckoned to begin at the time of the detailed measurement survey (DMS), quarterly progress report of internal monitoring and semi-annual external M&E report will be submitted to ADB. Within one year after the completion of resettlement plan implementation, a resettlement completion report will be submitted to ADB that includes lessons learned to improve resettlement work in future projects.

I. Resettlement Budget and Indicative Schedule of Resettlement Plan Implementation

12. The total costs of resettlement for provincial roads 314D and NR 13 and construction of the CBF is $1,380,966.58. Below is an indicated schedule of resettlement plan preparation and implementation.

Table I.1 Indicative Resettlement Schedule Activities Schedule Resettlement Plan preparation June – November 2011 ADB concurrence of draft resettlement plan November 2011 Resettlement Plan updating April 2012 Submission to and ADB concurrence of updated resettlement plan June 2012 Implementation of the approved updated resettlement plan July – December 2012 Internal monitoring (submission of quarterly reports) April 2012 – December 2012 External Monitoring (submission of bi-annual M&E reports) April 2012 – December 2013 ADB = Asian Development Bank, M&E = monitoring and evaluation.

II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

A. Project Background

13. In response to the Government of Cambodia’s request for TA to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project, the ADB mobilized a group of international and national consultants in March 2011. The TA was for a period of 14 months with most of the outputs of the consultants being completed in the first 6 months. Among others, the TA consultants were tasked to do the following: a. Prepare the engineering design for the upgrading of NR13 and 314D. The overall length of these roads is 91 kilometer (km). b. Prepare the engineering design for the upgrading of 150B, NR53 and 151B. The overall length of these roads is approximately 85 km. c. Prepare the engineering design for a CBF at Prey Var-Mocva that will provide efficient cross border transport and trade between Cambodia and Vietnam. B. Description of 314D, CBF, and NR13

14. Provincial Road 314D is gravel road and it starts from NR1 in Prasout Village, Kandieng Reay commune, Svay Teab in Svay Rieng Province. It runs for 26.6 km to the south and ends at the Cambodia-Vietnam Border in Prey Var village, Thmei commune, Kampong Rou district. The ROW of 314D is 40 m, measured 20 m each way from the road centerline.2 With the exception of several locations where the road crosses a bustling business center (such as Rou village in Kampong Rou), the existing ROW is basically clear of structures, interspersed occasionally by huts used for selling goods. Shops within 8 m either way from the centerline of the road are found in Ro Village. Table below lists the districts and communes traversed by 314D. Table II.1 Districts and Communes Traversed by 314D Province District Km Point Communes Village Svay Teab Kandieng Reay Prasout Ti Muoy Prasout Ti Pi Prasout Angk Ta Mouk Prey Rumduol Pou Vong Kampong Rou Preah Ponlea Pring Chrum Trapeang Run Tradaet Prey Thum Prey Sakum Nhor Trapeang Chhlonh Rou Svay Anat Trapeang Trav Ksetr Ruessei Am Thmei Ou Prey Var km = kilometer.

15. The CBF at Prey Var will be expanded and developed under the proposed project. The present CBF is located on a 10.9 hectare (ha) land and an additional 2.49 ha of land adjacent to

2 Government decree Prakas 6, “Measures to Crack Down on Anarchic Land Grabbing and Encroachment” (dated 27 September 1999), set the ROW for 2-digit national roads at 25 m from the road centerline, and for provincial roads at20 m from the road centerline.

4 5 the present facilities will be acquired. The CBF is located on the right hand side of 314D towards the Vietnam border.

16. NR13 starts from NR1 at Thmey village, Sangkhor commune, Svay Rieng town in Svay Rieng province. It runs northward for about 65 km before joining NR8 in Veal Smach village, Krabau commune, Kamchay Mear district in the province of Prey Neng. For the first 43 km, the road, with a carriageway of typically 6 m, is paved with double surface treatment (DBST). The remaining 22 km of the road is earth and gravel. There is visibly more traffic on NR13 than on 314D. However, there are more densely populated areas traversed where houses and shops are built close to the carriageway, such as in Chak village (Kompong Chak commune), Kampong Trach village (Kampong Trach commune), and Samruong village (Angk Prasrae commune). Also, there are more perimeter fences put up by the residents close to the carriageway. Table II.2 Districts and Communes Traversed by NR13 Province District Communes Km Point Village Svay Rieng Sangkhor Thmey Bak Ronorse Thlork Preah Tonle Po Phlear Akna Kot Rom Duol Kampong Chak Chak Prey Keav Sangkae Kouk Srama Ta Naeng Poun Ta Chou Chrung Popel Trapeang Kruos Trapeang Kraet Preah Angk Kaev Krouch Kampong Ampil Trasak Trapeang Damrei Romeas Haek Angk Prasrae Samraong Trapeang Rumdenh Thnal Peam Andoung Pou Bos Kokir Trapeang Tbal Trapeang Choar Trapeang Banteay Areaks Svay Kampong Trach Chong Ou Ta Trav Kampong Trach Amkpil Tuek Vil Trapeang Prei Ta Mau Trapeang Popel Ampil Traok Tras Muni Proeksa Voat Andoung Trabaek Trapeang Smach Andoung Trabaek Kamchay Krabau Tboung Voat

Province District Communes Km Point Village Mear Veal Smach km = kilometer, NR = national road.

C. Civil Works to be undertaken

17. NR13 and 314D will be paved with single bituminous treatment (SBST) and will have a standard carriageway of 7 m (i.e. 3.5 m either way from the centerline) and a paved shoulder of 1 m on each side of the carriageway. Existing bridges will be replaced and will have the same width as the road. Culverts will be extended or replaced as necessary. Ditches through major commune centers will be lined and covered, and the road will be raised on embankments in flood-prone areas.

18. The existing CBF facilities at Prey Var are very basic. Land to the east of the road is being developed by private owners and land to the east has government buildings offering greater scope for the CBF location. The design of the improvement of the CBF at Prey Var will be patterned, albeit smaller, after that of the Bavet-Moc Bai CBF located at the end of NR1 bordering Vietnam.

D. Measures being adopted to Minimize Adverse Social Impacts

19. The following measures have been adopted in order to minimize adverse social impacts: a. There will be no re-alignment of any segment of the road sections. b. A corridor of only 10 m from either side of the road centerline will be cleared of obstructions. 314D has a ROW of 40 m (i.e., 20 m from either side of the road centerline) while NR13 has a ROW of 50 m (i.e., 25 m from either side of the road centerline). 20. The construction of concrete and covered side drains in major commune centers will also reduce the COI in said locations. The carriageway and paved shoulder will only be 4.5 m from the centerline and additional 2 m would be needed for the construction of a side drain on each side of the road. The covered side drain can double as sidewalk. Following completion of detailed engineering design, the data on affected assets and people will be updated to reflect any reduction in the COI in commune centers.

21. Owners of entirely affected shops will be allowed to construct replacement structures before demolishing the existing ones in order to minimize, if not avoid, income loss arising from the disruption of business operation. Prior to and after the conduct of the IOL, local officials and residents have been advised to refrain from building new fixed structures along the COI.

6 7

CBF

III. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT

A. Methodology Used In Determining Project Impacts

22. The potential impacts of the Project have been determined with the conduct of the IOL where all fixed assets (i.e., lands used for residence, commerce, agriculture, including ponds; dwelling units; stalls and shops; miscellaneous structures, such as fences, tombs, wells; trees with commercial value; etc.) located inside the COI were identified, tagged, measured, their owners identified, their exact location pinpointed, and their replacement values calculated. Likewise, the severity of impact on the affected assets and the severity of impact to the livelihood and productive capacity of persons affected by such losses were determined. Photographs of the affected assets with a placard indicating their location and owners had been taken. Also, information on the households of the affected persons, such as sources of livelihood, income level, and ownership of productive assets were gathered. The IOL and census of affected peoplein 314D were conducted 20–25 May 2011 and in NR13 on 26 May to 2 June 2011. The IOL and census affected peoplein the proposed expanded CBF were conducted on 5–7 August 2011 based on preliminary information of the boundaries of the expanded area of the CBF.

B. Data Gathering Instrument

23. The basic tool used in the IOL and census of affected peoplewas a survey questionnaire. Detailed socioeconomic information on the household of affected peoplewhose main structures (i.e., houses and shops but excluding government buildings) stand to be partially or entirely affected was obtained with the use of a survey questionnaire written in Khmer. The questionnaire is divided into 3 sections. The first section seeks basic socioeconomic information on the displacd people, while the second section deals on the affected assets and livelihoods. The third section seeks information on other landholdings of the affected people’s households, including relocation options for those who lose entire houses and shops. (See Appendix 1 for a copy of the IOL questionnaire).

24. The survey of affected land in 314D and NR13 was limited to measuring the areas of land within the COI on each side of the roadway that were visibly occupied, and determining their use (i.e., for agriculture, residence, commerce, both for residence and commerce). With the exception of ROW land with houses and shops that were attended to when the survey team conducted the IOL and census of displacd people, it was impossible for the team to determine the identities of the occupants or users of land in the COI. It was likewise impossible for the survey team to determine the boundaries, and therefore the areas, of cultivated or built-on plots of ROW land in open swathes of land adjacent to the roadway because said occupied lands are not demarcated and there are no cadastral plans available. Also, even for plots of ROW land that had structures on them, the names and gender of the users or occupants of said plots of ROW land could not be determined if said houses and shops were locked or unattended to during the survey.

25. In view thereof, the survey team could only estimate the area of cultivated land (i.e., farmland) and woodlands (i.e., degraded public forest with naturally growing tree species) within the COI. Relatedly, the survey team could only estimate the area of ROW land used for residence and commerce that had structures on them (i.e., footprint of the structures) and those that are fenced in. These estimates will be validated and corrected as necessary during the updating of the resettlement plan, with the assistance of commune officials who will also sit as members of the Provincial RSWG, the main resettlement body that is tasked to carry out the

8 9

DMS.

26. Plots of land to be acquired in the expansion and development of the CBF are private. The identities of the owners of these plots of land, including residents who serve as caretakers of the properties, have been determined. Fixed assets found on the properties have also been surveyed.

C. The survey team

27. Other than an international and a domestic resettlement consultants, a team of 13 research assistants that included a survey coordinator, 8 enumerators, 2 computer data encoders, 1 statistician, and 1 replacement cost (market rates) researcher was organized to help prepare this resettlement plan. Except for the statistician and the replacement cost study (RCS) researcher, the rest of the local research assistants were based in the field. The research team was accompanied by commune or village officials in their data gathering activities.

D. Setting of the cut-off date for eligibility

28. The survey team met with district and commune officials, including the local population, prior to the commencement of the IOL and census of affected people. Among others, the purpose of said public meetings was to discuss the need for the IOL and socioeconomic survey (SES) and to explain the Project policy on cut-off date for eligibility to resettlement entitlements. For the purpose of the preparation of the resettlement plan, local official and residents were informed that the cut-off date coincides with the announcement about the Project and the completion of the IOL and census of the affected peoplein the districts, which was 25 May 2011 for 314D and 2 June 2011 for NR13. The list of affected peoplewill be updated and/or validated during the DMS following approval by project authorities of the project feasibility study. The IRC, the government body that is tasked to spearhead the conduct of the DMS and the implementation of the resettlement plan, will confirm the final date of the cut-off-date.

E. Replacement Cost Study (RCS)

29. In parallel with the conduct of the IOL and census of AHs, an RCS was carried out by a professional appraiser. The objective of the RCS was to establish compensation rates for land, structures, trees and crops that are sufficient for AHs to acquire or purchase a replacement for assets lost to the Project without deductions for taxes, and/or costs of transaction. The IOL survey team members and the RCS specialist spent some time visiting the project sites and agreed on the classifications to use in categorizing the various affected structures.

F. Affected fixed assets

1. Land 30. A total of [number] ha of land will be acquired for the Project in 314D, NR13 and for the CBF. All affected lands in 314D and NR13 are within the ROW and as such are State public land. However, affected plots of land in the expanded CBF are private. 31. 314D. A total of 27,936.2 m² of ROW land in 314D that are occupied or used by local residents will be cleared for the Project. Of these, 51.19% (14,300 m²) are used for residence, while 42.97% (12,004 m²) are cultivated, and 5.84% (1,632.2 m²) are used for commercial activities. All affected plots of land in 314D are inside the ROW and not covered with title or with legally recognized proof of ownership.

32. NR13. Some 47,398.3m² of ROW land in NR13 will be cleared for the Project. Of this, 94.27% (44,681.3m²) is cultivated, while 3.57% (1,690.1 m²) is used for residence, and 2.17% (1,026.9 m²) is used for commercial activities. There is no private land (i.e., covered by title or with legally recognized proof of ownership) affected in the rehabilitation of NR13.

33. CBF. In connection with the expansion and development of the CBF at Prey Var, a total of 24,945.72m² of private plots of land belonging to 3 individuals will be acquired. Of the private land to be acquired, 48.65% (12,135.12 m2) is rain-fed farmland belonging to a landed farming household. Grazing land makes up 42.33% (10,560 m2) of the total private land to be acquired, and this belongs to a Cambodian national presently living abroad. The rest of the private land to be acquired (2,250.6 m2) is residential land belonging to the owner of an adjacent property that is being developed into a hotel. Government land in the present CBF area is 10,982m².

Table III.1 Occupied Right-of-Way Land According to Use (m2) Commune Residential Commercial Farmland Total 314D Kandeang Reay 1,677.4 808.5 60.0 2,545.9 Prasout 3,624.9 6.0 4,978.0 8,608.9 Preah Ponlea 1,414.0 329.0 0.0 1,743.0 Prey Thum 24.0 0.0 12.0 36.0 Nhor 4,161.9 96.5 720.0 4,978.4 Ksetr 2,767.8 0.0 4.0 2,771.8 Thmei 630.0 392.2 6,230.0 7,252.2 Total 14,300.0 1,632.2 12,004.0 27,936.2 NR13 Sangkhor 126.0 48.0 12,420.0 12,594.0 Kampong Chak 265.9 128.1 6,445.4 6,839.4 Sangkae 0.0 0.0 5,345.8 5,345.8 Chrung Popel 201.2 120.0 4,311.0 4,632.2 Kampong Ampil 106.0 0.0 810.0 916.0 Angk Prasrae 148.5 88.0 3,840.0 4,076.5 Andoung Pou 107.0 60.0 4,204.0 4,371.0 Kampong Trach 429.0 582.8 4,545.8 5,557.6 Amkpil 22.5 0.0 845.3 867.8 Andoung Trabaek 14.0 0.0 16.0 30.0 Krabau 270.0 0.0 1,898.0 2,168.0 Total 1,690.1 1,026.9 44,681.3 47,398.3 km = kilometer, NR = national road.

34. In settlement areas and business centers, the identities of occupants of affected ROW lands had been determined. However, occupants or users of swathes of cultivated ROW land between settlement areas could not be determined, including plots of land in settlement areas with no houses or shops or when said houses or shops were unattended to during the IOL and census of AHs. Their identities will be determined with the active involvement of local cadastral officials during the DMS. Table below gives a breakdown of the affected ROW land in 314D and NR13 according to the gender of the head of the affected households (AHs).

10 11

Table III.2 Land Losses (in m²) According to Gender of AH Heads Gender of Head of Grazing Residential Commercial Farmland Total AH land 314D Male 8,331.0 1,213.2 60.0 9,604.2 Female 3,504.0 217.0 0.0 3,721.0 Owners not known 2,465.0 202.0 11,944.0* 14,611.0 Total 14,300.0 1,632.2 12,004.0 27,936.2 CBF+ Male 2,250.6 0.0 12,135.1 10,560.0 24,945.72 Female 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 Total NR13 Male 1,526.6 596.4 16,342.6 18,465.6 Female 118.5 45.5 4,769.7 4,933.7 Owners not known 45.0 385.0 23,569.0* 23,999.0 Total 1,690.1 1,026.9 44,681.3 47,398.3 m2 = square meter, NR = national road. *Strips of cultivated ROW land outside settlement areas. +Excluding the 10,982 m2 of government land at the CBF

2. Main Structures 35. 314D: A total of 107 main structures3 in 314D are adversely affected by the road improvement. Of this number, 57.94% (62 structures) are independent shops; while 33.64% (36 structures) are houses, and 8.41% (9 structures) are house-and-shops (see Table C-8).

36. Houses. Of the 36 affected houses in 314D, 6 were locked and unattended at the time of the survey. Therefore, the identities of the owners of these structures could not be obtained. All of these 6 unattended houses are entirely affected. Of the remaining 30 affected houses in 314D, 21 belong to male-headed households, of which 9 are entirely affected. Moreover, 4 of the affected houses belonging to male-headed households are being rented out for about $25 per month per house. There are 9 affected houses owned by women-headed households, of which 3 are entirely affected. (see Table III.6).

37. The 18 partially affected houses in 314D have an aggregate floor area of 397.8 m2. Five partially affected houses of construction grade of 2J (i.e., single floor with plastered brick walls, concrete columns, and concrete floor) account for 48.14% (or 191.5 m2) of the floor area of partially affected houses. The 18 entirely affected houses in 314D (comprising 9 of male-headed households, 3 of women-headed households and 6 of unidentied owners) have an aggregate floor area of 594.0 m2. Of this area, houses of 2J construction grade account for 29.46% (or 175 m2), followed by houses of 2C construction grade (i.e., single floor with earthen wall combined with temporary material, such as metal sheet, wood, thatch, or plastic; wooden posts; and earthen floor) that account for 26.94% (or 160 m2) of the aggregate floor area of entirely affected houses (see Table III.9).

38. House-and-stores. Of the 9 affected house-and-stores in 314D, 6 belong to male-headed

3 These include houses, buildings, and shops with four walls (not moveable temporary structures of ambulant vendors).

12 households, of which 2 are entirely affected. All 3 house-and-stores that belong to women-headed households are partially affected (see Table C-10).

39. The 7 partially affected house-and-stores in 314D have an aggregate floor area of 103.5 m2, while the 2 entirely affected house-and-stores have an aggregate floor area of 26.0 m2 only. All of the affected house-and-stores in 314D are of construction grades 2 (see Table C-14).

40. Independent shops. Of the 62 affected shops in 314D, 8 were locked and unattended at the time of the survey. 7 of these unattended shops are entirely affected. Of the remaining 54 affected shops in 314D, 36 belong to male-headed households, of which 28 are entirely affected. On the other hand, of the 18 affected shops owned by women-headed households, 10 are entirely affected (see Table C-11).

41. The 17 partially affected independent shops in 314D have an aggregate floor area of 167.0 m2. 4 shops of construction grade 2F (i.e., single floor with metal sheet walls, low quality wooden posts, and earthen floor) account for 27.54% (46.0 m2) of the combined floor area of the partially affected shops. The aggregate floor area of entirely affected shops in 314D is 1,003.2 m2. 16 shops of 2C construction grade account for 27.26% (273.5 m2) of the combined floor area of entirely affected shops (see Table C-16).

Table III.3. Location of Concentrated Commercial Areas in 314D District Communes Village No. Affected Shops* Kampong Rou Nhor Rou Ksetr Ruessei Am Thmei Ou *Includes stand-alone shops and house-cum-shops 42. CBF: 3 concrete single floor buildings4 with a combined floor area of 332.0 m2 and a 32 m2 thatched hut (construction grade 2C) all belonging to the custom and immigration offices at the CBF are entirely affected. The household taking care of the affected grazing land has a 35 m2 house (construction grade 1C) and a 35 m2 shop (construction grade 1B), while the household taking care of the affected private residential has a 20 m2 house-and-shop of construction grade 1A. These caretaker households are male-headed and their houses and shops are affected entirely.

43. NR13. A total of 222 main structures in NR13 are adversely affected by the road improvement. Of this number, 51.35% (114 structures) are independent shops, while 47.30% (105 structures) are houses, and 1.35% are (3 structures) house-and-shops.

44. Houses. 24 of the 105 affected houses in NR13 were locked and unattended at the time of the survey. 6 of these unattended houses are entirely affected. 57 of the remaining 81 affected houses in NR13 belong to male-headed households, of which 12 are entirely affected. Moreover, 1 of the affected houses belonging to a male-headed household is being rented out for about $25 per month. Of the 24 affected houses owned by women-headed households, 8 are entirely affected (see Table C-9).

45. The 79 partially affected houses in NR13 have an aggregate floor area of 910.3 m2. 18 partially affected houses of construction grade of 2F account for 27.50% (or 250.30 m2) of the

4 By construction grade, 2 buildings are of construction grade 3D with a combined floor area of 236 m2, and 1 building of construction grade 2J with a floor area of 96 m2.

12 13 floor area of partially affected houses. 14 other partially affected houses of 2J construction grade account for 25.82% (235.0 m2) of the combined floor area of partially affected houses. The 26 entirely affected houses in NR13 have an aggregate floor area of 717.5 m2. Of this area, 7 houses of 2FJ construction grade account for 32.47% (or 233.0 m2), followed by 7 other houses of 2C construction grade that account for 26.90% (or 193.0 m2) of the aggregate floor area of entirely affected houses (see Table C-13).

46. House-and-stores. 2 of the affected house-and-stores in NR13 belong to male-headed households, while 1 belongs to a woman-headed household. All 3 house-and-stores are partially affected (see Table C-10).

47. The 3 partially affected house-and-stores in NR13 have an aggregate floor area of 35.0 m2 only. 2 of these house-and-stores are of construction grade 2J and have an aggregate area of 23.0 m2. There are no entirely affected house-and-stores in NR13 (see Table C-15).

48. Independent shops. 20 of the 114 affected shops in NR13 were locked and unattended at the time of the survey. 6 of these unattended shops are entirely affected. 73 of the remaining 94 affected shops in NR13 belong to male-headed households, of which 45 are entirely affected. 1 of the affected shops belonging to a male-headed household is being rented out for about $25 per month. Of the 21 affected shops owned by women-headed households, 6 are entirely affected (see Table C-11).

49. The 57 partially affected independent shops in NR13 have an aggregate floor area of 549.3 m2. 23 shops of construction grade 2F account for 40.92% (224.8 m2) of the combined floor area of the partially affected shops. The aggregate floor area of the 57 entirely affected shops in NR13 is 1,416.1 m2. 16 shops of 2F construction grade account for 25.07% (355.0 m2) of the combined floor area of entirely affected shops (see Table C-17).

Table III.4. Location of Concentrated Commercial Areas in NR13 No. Affected District Communes Village Shops* Rom Duol Kampong Chak Chak Romeas Haek Angk Prasrae Samraong Kampong Trach Kampong Trach NR = national road. *Includes stand-alone shops and house-cum-shops

Table III.5 Number of Affected Main Structures According to Use House-and- Commune House store Store/shops Total 314D Kandeang Reay 6 4 7 17 Prasout 10 2 11 23 Preah Ponlea 0 0 6 6 Prey Thum 0 0 0 0 Nhor 5 3 21 29 Ksetr 13 0 6 19 Thmei 2 0 11 13 Total 36 9 62 107 CBF* Thmei 1 1 1 3

House-and- Commune House store Store/shops Total Total 1 1 1 3 NR13 Sangkhor 15 1 23 39 Kampong Chak 28 0 14 42 Sangkae 10 0 16 26 Chrung Popel 13 0 7 20 Kampong Ampil 2 0 9 11 Angk Prasrae 9 1 6 16 Andoung Pou 5 0 7 12 Kampong Trach 22 1 19 42 Amkpil 1 0 8 9 Andoung Trabaek 0 0 1 1 Krabau 0 0 4 4 Total 105 3 114 222 CBF = cross-border facility, NR = national road. Excluding the 3 concrete offices and 1 thatched hut of the customs and immigration offices.

Table III.6 Affected Households with Affected House by Severity of Loss Male Headed Women Headed Unknown Owners* Commune Partial Entire Total Partial Entire Total Partial Entire Total 314D Kandeang Reay 5 0 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 Prasout 2 4 6 1 0 1 0 3 3 Nhor 1 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 2 Ksetr 4 4 8 3 2 5 0 0 0 Thmei 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 Total 12 9 21 6 3 9 0 6 6 CBF Thmei 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR13 Sangkhor 6 1 7 4 1 5 2 1 3 Kampong Chak 12 2 14 6 1 7 6 1 7 Sangkae 3 2 5 2 1 3 0 2 2 Chrung Popel 6 2 8 3 0 3 1 1 2 Kampong Ampil 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 Angk Prasrae 7 0 7 0 1 1 1 0 1 Andoung Pou 2 1 3 0 2 2 0 0 0 Kampong Trach 9 3 12 1 1 2 7 1 8 Amkpil 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Total 45 12 57 16 8 24 18 6 24 CBF = cross-border facility, NR = national road. *Houses were closed and un-attended at the time of the survey.

Table III.7 Affected Households Losing House-Store by Severity Male Headed Women Headed Unknown Owners* Commune Partial Entire Total Partial Entire Total Partial Entire Total 314D Kandeang Reay 3 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 Prasout 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nhor 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 Total 4 2 6 3 0 3 0 0 0 CBF

14 15

Male Headed Women Headed Unknown Owners* Commune Partial Entire Total Partial Entire Total Partial Entire Total Thmei 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR13 Sangkhor 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Angk Prasrae 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Kampong Trach 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 CBF = cross-border facility, NR = national road. *House-stores were closed and un-attended at the time of the survey.

Table III.8 Affected Households with Affected Shops by Severity of Loss Male Headed Women Headed Unknown Owners* Commune Partial Entire Total Partial Entire Total Partial Entire Total 314D Kandeang Reay 1 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Prasout 1 5 6 3 1 4 0 1 1 Preah Ponlea 0 2 2 2 1 3 0 1 1 Nhor 3 8 11 1 5 6 0 4 4 Ksetr 1 4 5 0 1 1 0 0 0 Thmei 2 3 5 2 2 4 1 1 2 Total 8 28 36 8 10 18 1 7 8 CBF Thmei 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR13 Sangkhor 3 9 12 4 4 8 1 2 3 Kampong Chak 5 5 10 1 1 2 2 0 2 Sangkae 2 8 10 5 0 5 1 0 1 Chrung Popel 2 4 6 0 0 0 0 1 1 Kampong Ampil 2 5 7 0 0 0 1 1 2 Angk Prasrae 3 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 Andoung Pou 4 2 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 Kampong Trach 5 6 11 2 1 3 5 0 5 Amkpil 1 0 1 1 0 1 4 2 6 Krabau 1 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 Andoung Trabaek 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Total 28 45 73 15 6 21 14 6 20 CBF = cross-border facility, NR = national road. *Shops were closed and un-attended at the time of the survey.

Table III.9 Floor Area of Affected Houses by Construction Grade 314D Partially Affected Entirely Affected Structure Structure Classification Frequency Area (m²) Classification Frequency Area (m²) 1A 1 24.0 1A 0 0.0 1C 0 0.0 1C 1 25.0 1D 0 0.0 1D 2 41.0 2B 0 0.0 2B 1 8.0 2C 1 4.0 2C 6 160.0 2D 0 0.0 2D 1 48.0 2F 5 145.3 2F 4 137.0 2G 2 13.0 2G 0 0.0 2J 6 191.5 2J 3 175.0

Partially Affected Entirely Affected Structure Structure Classification Frequency Area (m²) Classification Frequency Area (m²) 3C 1 9.0 3C 0 0.0 4A 2 11.0 4A 0 0.0 Total 18 397.8 Total 18 594.0 m2 = square meter.

Table III.10 Floor Area of Affected Houses by Construction Grade NR13 Partially Affected Entirely Affected Structure Structure Classification Frequency Area (m²) Classification Frequency Area (m²) 1C 1 18.0 1C 0 0.0 1E 1 6.5 1E 1 36.0 2A 1 12.5 2A 1 24.0 2B 7 71.5 2B 1 20.0 2C 2 33.8 2C 7 193.0 2D 2 30.5 2D 0 0.0 2E 2 13.0 2E 2 51.0 2F 18 250.3 2F 7 233.0 2G 5 34.3 2G 2 54.0 2H 3 48.0 2H 4 90.5 2I 1 5.5 2I 0 0.0 2J 14 235.0 2J 0 0.0 2K 1 9.0 2K 0 0.0 3C 6 40.8 3C 1 16.0 4A 12 83.8 4A 0 0.0 4B 2 17.8 4B 0 0.0 Total 78 910.3 Total 26 717.5 m2 = square meter.

Table III.11 Floor Area of House-stores by Construction Grade 314D Partially Affected Entirely Affected Structure Structure Classification Frequency Area (m²) Classification Frequency Area (m²) 2A 0 0.0 2A 1 20.0 2B 1 28.5 2B 0 0.0 2C 0 0.0 2C 1 6.0 2E 1 4.0 2E 0 0.0 2F 2 36.0 2F 0 0.0 2J 3 35.0 2J 0 0.0 Total 7 103.5 Total 2 26.0 m2 = square meter.

Table III.12 Floor Area of House-stores by Construction Grade NR13 Partially Affected Structure Classification Frequency Area (m²) Entirely Affected 2J 2 23 0 2B 1 12 0 Total 3 35 0 m2 = square meter, NR = national road.

16 17

Table III.13 Floor Area of Shops by Construction Grade 314D Partially Affected Entirely Affected Structure Structure Classification Frequency Area (m²) Classification Frequency Area (m²) 1A 0 0.0 1A 2 52.0 1B 0 0.0 1B 1 6.5 1C 2 34.0 1C 6 95.0 1E 0 0.0 1E 1 24.0 2A 0 0.0 2A 2 30.0 2B 3 34.5 2B 4 119.0 2C 3 8.5 2C 16 273.5 2F 4 46.0 2F 5 126.0 2G 0 0.0 2G 4 123.2 2H 2 22.0 2H 0 0.0 2J 2 15.0 2J 4 154.0 3C 1 7.0 3C 0 0.0 Total 17 167.0 Total 45 1,003.2 m2 = square meter.

Table III.14 Floor Area of Shops by Construction Grade NR13 Partially affected Entirely affected Structure Frequency Total affected Structure Total affected Classification Entire area (m²) Classification Frequency area (m²) 1A 2 22.0 1A 4 87.0 1B 0 0.0 1B 1 30.0 1C 1 15.0 1C 4 63.5 1E 0 0.0 1E 2 57.0 2A 7 79.5 2A 4 189.5 2B 8 35.5 2B 3 43.0 2C 4 52.0 2C 10 212.0 2D 1 12.0 2D 0 0.0 2E 3 29.5 2E 0 0.0 2F 23 224.8 2F 16 355.0 2G 1 8.0 2G 0 0.0 2H 3 29.0 2H 8 234.0 2J 4 42.0 2J 4 132.6 2K 0 0.0 2K 1 12.5 Total 57 549.3 Total 57 1,416.1

3. Secondary (miscellaneous) structures 50. 314D: Affected secondary structures of various construction grades in 314D include 83 pieces of fence with an aggregate length of 12,677.2 linear meters; 107 pieces of extended eaves with an aggregate area of 2,515.4 m2 (normally used as shops); 89 pieces of concrete pavement with an aggregate area of 1,970.0 m2; 473 pieces of concrete pipe culverts; a 16 m2 concrete public waiting shed; 12 pieces of metal signboards, and 2 concrete pagoda gates. In addition, 135 electric and telecommunication posts will need to be relocated behind the COI.

51. CBF: The customs and immigration offices at the CBF will also lose a thatched shed and

18 a stupa (small altar for venerating spirits of deceased relatives). Additionally, a concrete fence of construction grade F6 and measuring 206 meters long will be acquired.

52. NR13: Affected secondary structures of various construction grades in NR13 include 126 pieces of fence with an aggregate length of 22,269.6 linear meters; 399 extended eaves with an aggregate area of 7,496.5 m2 (normally used as shops); 284 pieces of concrete pavement with an aggregate area of 7,455m2; 13 pieces of tiled pavement with an aggregate area of 218 m2; 3 deep wells and 4 dug wells; 11 pieces of concrete pipe culverts; 10 waiting sheds with an aggregate area of 224 m2; 9 pieces of metal signboards, and 3 concrete pagoda gates. In addition, 21 electric and telecommunication posts will need to be relocated behind the COI.

Table III.15 Quantities of Affected Extended Eaves Partially Affected Entirely Affected Structure Structure Classification Frequency Area (m²) Classification Frequency Area (m²) 314D 1C 1 15.0 1C 2 77.0 2A 4 79.5 2A 4 125.0 2B 24 486.0 2B 25 578.2 2C 0 0.0 2C 5 123.0 2D 0 0.0 2D 1 30.0 2F 0 0.0 2F 15 268.0 2G 0 0.0 2G 1 11.0 2J 3 29.0 2J 15 452.2 2I 0 0.0 2I 1 21.0 3C 3 64.1 3C 2 141.4 4A 0 0.0 4A 1 15.0 Total 35 673.6 Total 72 1,841.8 NR13 1A 12 157.0 1A 44 1,042.9 2A 121 1,678.5 2A 113 2,452.2 2F 0 0.0 2F 1 12.0 4A 8 146.0 4A 46 898.8 4B 28 369.0 4B 26 741.0 Total 169 2,350.5 Total 230 5,146.9 m2 = square meter, NR = national road.

Table III.16 Quantities of Fence Partially Affected Entirely Affected Structure Classification Length (m) Structure Classification Length (m) 314D F1 10,077.0 F1 168.5 F2 1,460.2 F2 465.5 F3 0.0 F3 14.0 F4 220.0 F4 121.0 F5 53.0 F5 22.0 F6 0.0 F6 76.0 Total 11,810.2 867.0

CBF F6 0.0 F6 206.0 Total 0.0 206.0 NR13 F1 19,168.0 F1 87.0

18 19

Partially Affected Entirely Affected Structure Classification Length (m) Structure Classification Length (m) F2 1,341.2 F2 191.5 F3 587.9 F3 349.0 F4 327.0 F4 211.0 F5 3.0 F5 0.0 F6 4.0 F6 0.0 Total 21,431.1 Total 838.5 CBF = cross-border facility, m =meter, NR = national road.

Table III.17 Assorted Secondary Structures Tiled Pipe Metal Sheet Concrete Concrete Pavement Culvert Sign Board Pagoda gate Communes pavement (m²) (m2) (Count) (Count) (Count) 314D Kandeang Reay 410.0 0.0 20.0 5.0 0.0 Prasout 110.5 0.0 14.0 0.0 1.0 Preah Ponlea 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prey Thum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Nhor 1,327.0 0.0 11.0 6.0 1.0 Ksetr 5.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Thmei 117.5 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Total 1,970.0 0.0 473.0 12.0 2.0 NR13 Sangkhor 737.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Kampong Chak 2,008.0 63.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Sangkae 940.0 16.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Chrung Popel 715.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Kampong Ampil 122.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Angk Prasrae 475.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Andoung Pou 494.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Kampong Trach 1,868.0 139.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Amkpil 81.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Andoung Trabaek 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Krabau 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 7,455.0 218.0 11.0 9.0 3.0 m2 = square meter, NR = national road.

Table III.18 Affected Wells and Waiting Sheds NR13 Deep Well Dug Well Waiting Shed (m2) Commune (Count) (Count) Construction Grade Area (m2) Sangkhor 0 1 2H 25 Kampong Chak 0 0 2F 9 Sangkae 1 0 2G 43 Chrung Popel 1 0 2H 14 Kampong Ampil 0 0 2H 13 Angk Prasrae 1 1 2G 14 Andoung Pou 0 1 2H 18 Kampong Trach 0 0 2H 52 Amkpil 0 0 2G 21 Andoung Trabaek 0 1 2F 15 Krabau 0 0 - 0 Total 3 4 - 224

Table III.19 Affected Electric and Communication Posts Communes Concrete Steel Wooden 314D Kandeang Reay 4 3 0 Prasout 0 0 0 Preah Ponlea 0 0 0 Prey Thum 0 0 0 Nhor 48 0 69 Ksetr 5 0 0 Thmei 0 0 6 Total 57 3 75 NR13 Sangkhor 2 0 4 Kampong Chak 0 2 5 Sangkae 1 0 0 Chrung Popel 2 0 0 Kampong Ampil 1 0 0 Angk Prasrae 1 0 0 Andoung Pou 1 0 0 Kampong Trach 1 0 0 Amkpil 0 0 0 Andoung Trabaek 0 0 0 Krabau 1 0 0 Total 10 2 9 NR = national road.

4. Affected crops and trees 53. All standing annual crops will be allowed to be harvested before the start of civil works in a particular section of the Project road. This can be achieved with the synchronization of the start of civil works and the cropping schedule of AHs cultivating plots of land in the ROW. In the event that crops can not be harvested before construction, AHs will be compensated at replacement cost.

54. 314D: A total of 584 perennials of various species and age will be cleared from the COI in 314D. These trees are not commercially grown but sporadically planted inside the ROW. Of this number, 82 are not yet bearing fruits. In addition, some 1,650 of timber trees of commercial value will also be cleared from the COI.

Table III.20 Quantities of Affected Perennials 314D Categories Type of Perennial 1* 2 3 Total Mango 14 124 10 148 Jackfruit 12 25 3 40 Teuk Doh Kor 2 14 0 16 Coconut 2 18 0 20 Betel nut 1 5 5 11 Palm tree 3 145 31 179 Kampingreah 9 0 6 15 Guava 4 0 17 21 Papaya 2 2 3 7 Tamarind 1 3 11 15 Cashew 0 4 2 6

20 21

Categories Type of Perennial 1* 2 3 Total Others 32 36 38 106 Total 82 376 126 584 *Not yet bearing fruits

Table III.21 Quantities of Affected Timber Trees 314D Categories Type of Timber Trees 1 2 3 Total Pine tree 0 10 0 10 Chankiry 0 0 30 30 Bamboo 8 100 270 378 Cassia 10 246 612 868 Eucalyptus 0 1 44 45 Chhat 0 1 4 5 Flamboyant tree 0 1 13 14 Loeung Reach 0 0 3 3 Rubber tree 0 1 0 1 Smach 0 0 148 148 Other trees 0 13 135 148 Total 18 373 1,259 1,650

55. CBF: A total of 583 timber trees and 15 fruit trees on private and government land will be acquire in the expansion and development of the CBF.

Table III.22 Quantities of Affected Fruit and Timber Trees CBF Categories Type of Trees 1 2 3 Total Coconut 0 3 0 3 Palm 0 5 7 12 Shade tree (Chankiri) 0 0 9 9 Acacia 344 230 0 574

56. NR13: A total of 966 perennials of various species and age will be cleared from the COI in NR13. These trees are not commercially grown but sporadically planted inside the ROW. Of this number, 195 are not yet bearing fruits. In addition, some 8,940 of timber trees of commercial value will also be cleared from the COI.

Table III.23 Quantities of Affected Perennials NR13 Categories Type of Perennial 1* 2 3 Total Mango 86 333 29 448 Coconut 21 12 2 35 Betel nut 8 0 6 14 Tamarind 1 8 0 9 Jackfruit 18 30 3 51 Palm tree 13 85 1 99 Teuk Doh Kor 0 4 0 4 Papaya 2 15 0 17 Guava 9 4 19 32 Cashew 37 8 0 45 Other tree 0 163 49 212

Categories Type of Perennial 1* 2 3 Total Total 195 662 109 966 *Not yet bearing fruits

Table III.24 Quantities of Affected Timber Trees NR13 Categories Type of Timber Trees 1 2 3 Total Pine Tree 2 0 0 2 Chankiry 38 0 1 39 Bamboo 3,188 1 8 3,197 Cassia 5,140 15 0 5,155 Eucalyptus 39 2 21 62 Chhat 0 18 2 20 Flamboya 0 9 0 9 Loeungreach 0 4 0 4 Other tree 0 452 0 452 Total 8,407 501 32 8,940

5. Net incomes from shops 57. Information on the monthly net incomes of households with partially and entirely affected shops in 314D and NR13 were obtained for the purpose of calculating the probable loss in income these households would incur if they were to totally stop operation during re-construction and/or relocation.

58. 314D: Among the 10 households in 314D whose shops are partially affected and who responded to the query on net income, 6 claimed to be earning a net income of less than $100 a month, while 2 claimed to earn a net income of between $101 and $200 a month. 2 others claimed to earn a net income of more than $200 a month from their shops. Similarly, among the 26 households losing entire shops who responded to the query on net income, 15 households (57.69% of the respondents) claimed to be earning a net income of less than $100 a month, while 6 households (23.08%) claimed to earn a net income of between $101 and $200 a month. 5 others claimed to earn a net income of more than $200 a month from their shops.

59. NR13: Among the 39 households in NR13 whose shops are partially affected and who responded to the query on net income, 30 (76.92% of the respondents) claimed to be earning a net income of less than $100 a month, while 7 claimed to earn a net income of between $101 and $200 a month. 2 others claimed to earn a net income of more than $200 a month from their shops. Similarly, among the 43 households losing entire shops would responded to the query on net income, 29 (67.44% of the respondents) claimed to be earning a net income of less than $100 a month, while 10 households (23.26%) claimed to earn a net income of between $101 and $200 a month. 4 others claimed to earn a net income of more than $200 a month from their shops.

Table III.25 Range of Net Monthly Income of Partially Affected Shops 314D Net Monthly Income Total Head of AH Commune $100 or $101 - > $200 N/A* Less $200 Male Kandeang Reay 0 0 1 0 1 Prasout 1 0 0 0 1 Nhor 1 0 1 1 3

22 23

Net Monthly Income Total Head of AH Commune $100 or $101 - > $200 N/A* Less $200 Ksetr 0 0 0 1 1 Thmei 0 1 0 1 2 Total 2 1 2 3 8 Female Prasout 2 0 0 1 3 Preah Ponlea 0 1 0 1 2

Nhor 0 0 0 1 1

Thmei 2 0 0 0 2

Total 4 1 0 3 8

Thmei 1 1 Owners not known Total 1 1

*No answer

Table III.26 Range of Net Monthly Income of Entirely Affected Shops PR 314D Net Monthly Income Head of AH Commune $100 or $101 - Total > $200 N/A* Less $200 Kandeang Reay 1 0 3 2 6 Prasout 2 0 1 2 5 Preah Ponlea 0 1 1 0 2 Male Nhor 4 2 0 2 8 Ksetr 1 0 0 3 4 Thmei 0 2 0 1 3 Total 8 5 5 10 28 Prasout 0 0 0 1 1 Preah Ponlea 0 1 0 0 1 Nhor 4 0 0 1 5 Female Ksetr 1 0 0 0 1 Thmei 2 0 0 0 2 Total 7 1 0 2 10 Prasout 1 1

Preah Ponlea 1 1

Owners not known Nhor 4 4

Thmei 1 1

Total 7 7

*No answer

Table III.27 Range of Net Monthly Income of Partially Affected Shops NR13 Net Monthly Income Gender Commune $100 or $101 - Total >$200 N/A Less $200 Male Sangkhor 1 1 1 0 3 Kampong Chak 3 0 1 1 5 Sangkae 0 1 0 1 2 Chrung Popel 2 0 0 0 2 Kampong Ampil 2 0 0 0 2 Angk Prasrae 3 0 0 0 3 Andoung Pou 3 0 0 1 4 Kampong Trach 3 1 0 1 5 Amkpil 0 1 0 0 1 Krabau 1 0 0 0 1

Net Monthly Income Gender Commune $100 or $101 - Total >$200 N/A Less $200 Total 18 4 2 4 28 Female Sangkhor 3 1 0 0 4 Kampong Chak 1 0 0 0 1

Sangkae 4 1 0 0 5

Andoung Pou 1 0 0 0 1

Kampong Trach 2 0 0 0 2

Amkpil 1 0 0 0 1

Andoung Trabaek 0 1 0 0 1

Total 12 3 0 0 15

Kampong Chak 2 2

Sangkae 1 1

Kampong Ampil 1 1 Owners not known Kampong Trach 5 5

Amkpil 4 4

Total 13 13

Table III.28 Range of Net Monthly Income of Entirely Affected Shops NR13 Net Monthly Income Gender Commune $100 or $101 - Total >$200 N/A Less $200 Male Sangkhor 7 1 0 0 8 Kampong Chak 2 2 0 1 5 Sangkae 1 0 2 5 8 Chrung Popel 3 0 1 0 4 Kampong Ampil 3 1 0 1 5 Angk Prasrae 3 0 0 0 3 Andoung Pou 1 1 0 1 3 Kampong Trach 4 2 0 0 6 Krabau 1 1 1 0 3 Total 25 8 4 8 45 Female Sangkhor 3 1 0 0 4 Kampong Chak 1 0 0 0 1 Kampong Trach 0 1 0 0 1 Total 4 2 0 0 6 Owners not known Chrung Popel 1 1

Kampong Ampil 1 1

Amkpil 2 2

Total 4 4

24 25

IV. SOCIO-ECONOMIC INFORMATION AND PROFILE

A. Introduction

60. A socioeconomic survey (SES) of the affected households (AHs) was conducted in parallel with the IOL. A sample of at least 20% of AHs losing entire houses and shops and sources of income, and a sample of at least 10% of AHs are affected by the partial loss of their houses and shops, were randomly selected from the list of affected households generated immediately following the IOL in each road section. In road sections where there were less than 50 severely affected households, the SES covered 100% of the severely affected while maintaining the 10% sample size of the partially affected AHs. Not covered in the SES were AHs affected only by the loss of secondary structures, such as fences, gates, driveways, in addition to randomly grown trees (i.e., not in a commercial plantation or orchard) inside the COI.

61. The SES gathered information on the AHs’ living standards and living conditions as well as their perceptions towards the project. Information gathered has guided the preparation of an appropriate resettlement strategy for the Project. The SES data set also serves as a baseline of AH living conditions to form part of the monitoring and evaluation data that will assess the extent to which the measures of this resettlement plan are effective in mitigating land acquisition and resettlement impacts.

B. Location and Type of Affected Assets of Sample AHs

62. 314D: 26 of the 51 male-headed AHs and 9 of the 26 women-headed AHs surveyed in 314D are affected by the partial or entire loss of their houses. In addition, 17 male-headed AHs and 11 women-headed AHs are affected by the partial or entire loss of their house-and-stores. Another 8 male-headed AHs and 56 women-headed AHs are affected by the partial or entire loss of their independent shops. The affected structures of the sample AHs are mostly located in the communes of Kandien Reay, Prasout, Nhor, and Ksetr.

Table IV.1 Affected Assets of Sample AHs 314D Gender of AH Affected assets Commune Total Head House House-store Shop Male Kandieng Reay 5 9 1 15 Prasout 7 1 1 9 Preah Ponlea 0 1 0 1 Nhor 2 5 3 10 Ksetr 12 1 1 14 Thmei 0 0 2 2 Total 26 17 8 51 Female Kandieng Reay 1 1 0 2 Prasout 1 0 2 3 Preah Ponlea 0 1 2 3 Nhor 0 6 1 7 Ksetr 6 0 0 6 Thmei 1 3 1 5 Total 9 11 6 26

63. NR13: In NR13, thirty-four of the 72 male-headed AHs and 6 of the women-headed AHs surveyed are affected by the partial or entire loss of their houses. In addition, 26 male-headed AHs and 4 women-headed AHs are affected by the partial or entire loss of their

26 house-and-stores. Another 12 male-headed AHs and 4 women-headed AHs are affected by the partial or entire loss of their independent shops. The affected structures of the sample AHs are mostly located in the communes of Kampong Chak and Kampong Trach.

Table IV.2 Affected Assets of Sample AHs NR13 Gender of AH Affected assets Commune Total Head House House-store Shop Male Sangkhor 4 3 1 8 Kampong Chak 4 4 3 11 Sangkae 0 3 0 3 Chrung Popel 6 0 1 7 Kampong Ampil 3 1 2 6 Angk Prasrae 4 0 2 6 Andoung Pou 4 2 1 7 Kampong Trach 9 8 1 18 Amkpil 0 1 1 2 Andoung Trabaek 0 1 0 1 Krabau 0 3 0 3 Total 34 26 12 72 Female Kampong Chak 2 1 0 3 Sangkae 2 1 1 4 Chrung Popel 1 0 0 1 Angk Prasrae 0 1 0 1 Kampong Trach 1 0 2 3 Amkpil 0 1 1 2 Total 6 4 4 14

64. In 314D, 36 of the 51 male-headed AHs (or 70.59%) and 20 of the 26 women-headed AHs (or 76.92%) have been living or in occupation of their affected houses and shops for 5 to 9 years already. In NR13, while 31 of the 72 male-headed AHs (or 43.06%) have been living or in occupation of their affected houses and shops for 5 to 9 years already, 22 other AHs (30.56%) have been living or in occupation of their affected houses and shops for 1 to 2 years only. Women-headed AHs in NR13 seem to have settled to live and conduct business inside the road right-of-way more recently than male-headed AHs.

Table IV.3 Years in Possession of Affected Main Structures Years in Affected assets Gender of AH Head Total possession House House-store Shop 314D Male 1 – 2 Ys 3 1 1 5 3 – 4 Ys 5 3 2 10 5 – 9 Ys 18 13 5 36 Total 26 17 8 51 Female 1 – 2 Ys 0 4 0 4 3 – 4 Ys 1 1 0 2 5 – 9 Ys 8 6 6 20 Total 9 11 6 26 NR13 Male 1 – 2 Ys 10 9 3 22 3 – 4 Ys 5 8 4 17

5 – 9 Ys 19 7 5 31

Over 9 ys 0 2 0 2

26 27

Years in Affected assets Gender of AH Head Total possession House House-store Shop Total 34 26 12 72

Female 1 – 2 Ys 3 0 1 4 3 – 4 Ys 2 4 1 7 5 – 9 Ys 1 0 2 3 Over 9 ys 0 0 0 0 Total 6 4 4 14

C. Demographic information on the Sample AHs

1. Marital status of sample AH Heads 65. Majority (52.94% or 27 persons) of the 51 sample male household heads in 314D are married, while 23 other male household heads are still single. On the other hand, widowed and married women have an equal number of 9 each (34.6% each of the sample 26 AH heads). Also, single women AH heads account for 26.92% the sample women-headed AHs.

Table IV.4 Civil Status of Head of Sample AHs 314D Civil Status Gender of AH Commune Widow/ Total Head Single Married Divorced Widower Male Kandieng Reay 8 0 7 0 15 Prasout 3 0 6 0 9 Preah Ponlea 0 0 1 0 1 Nhor 5 0 4 1 10 Ksetr 5 0 9 0 14 Thmei 2 0 0 0 2 Total 23 0 27 1 51 Female Kandieng Reay 0 1 1 0 2 Prasout 2 0 1 0 3 Preah Ponlea 0 1 2 0 3 Nhor 2 3 2 0 7 Ksetr 3 2 1 0 6 Thmei 0 2 2 1 5 Total 7 9 9 1 26

66. In NR13, most (97.22% or 70 persons) of the 72 sample male household heads are married. In contrast, all of the while 23 other male household heads are still single. On the other hand, widowed and married women have an equal number of 9 each (34.6% each of the sample 26 AH heads). Also, single women AH heads account for 26.92% the sample women-headed AHs.

Table IV.5 Civil Status of Head of Sample AHs NR13 Gender of AH Civil Status Commune Total Head Widow/Widower Married Male Sangkhor 0 8 8 Kampong Chak 0 11 11

Sangkae 0 3 3

Chrung Popel 0 7 7

Kampong Ampil 0 6 6

Angk Prasrae 0 6 6

Gender of AH Civil Status Commune Total Head Widow/Widower Married Andoung Pou 0 7 7

Kampong Trach 1 17 18

Amkpil 1 1 2

Andoung Trabaek 0 1 1

Krabau 0 3 3

Total 2 70 72

Female Kampong Chak 3 0 3 Sangkae 4 0 4 Chrung Popel 1 0 1 Angk Prasrae 1 0 1 Kampong Trach 3 0 3 Amkpil 2 0 2 Total 14 0 14

2. Physical condition and age of sample AH Heads 67. None of the sample male AH heads in 314D is disabled, although 11 (21.57%) of the 51 male respondents are aged 60 or older. 5 (19.23%) of the 26 women respondents are aged 60 years or older. In addition 2 of the women respondents have disabilities.

Table IV.6 Head of Sample AHs by Physical Condition and Age 314D Gender of AH Physical Age grouping Commune Total Head condition < 60 Years > 60 Years Male Normal Kandieng Reay 13 2 15 Prasout 9 0 9 Preah Ponlea 1 0 1 Nhor 4 6 10 Ksetr 12 2 14 Thmei 1 1 2 Total 40 11 51 Female Normal Kandieng Reay 1 1 2 Prasout 3 0 3 Preah Ponlea 3 0 3 Nhor 4 3 7 Ksetr 4 0 4 Thmei 4 1 5 Total 19 5 24 Handicapped Ksetr 2 0 2 Total 2 0 2

68. In NR13, nine (12.50%) of the 72 male respondents are aged 60 years or older, 2 of whom also have disabilities. None of the women respondents has disabilities, although 3 fall within the elderly age bracket.

28 29

Table IV.7 Head of Sample AHs by Physical Condition and Age NR13 Age AH Grouping Gender of AH Physical Commune < 60 Total Head condition > 60 Years Years Male Normal Sangkhor 8 0 8 Kampong Chak 6 5 11 Sangkae 3 0 3 Chrung Popel 6 0 6 Kampong Ampil 6 0 6 Angk Prasrae 6 0 6 Andoung Pou 6 1 7 Kampong Trach 16 1 17 Amkpil 2 0 2 Andoung Trabaek 1 0 1 Krabau 3 0 3 Total 63 7 70 Handicapped Chrung Popel 0 1 1 Kampong Trach 0 1 1 Total 0 2 2 Female Normal Kampong Chak 1 2 3 Sangkae 3 1 4 Chrung Popel 1 0 1 Angk Prasrae 1 0 1 Kampong Trach 3 0 3 Amkpil 2 0 2 Total 11 3 14

3. Ethnicity and religion of the sample AH Heads 69. All respondent AH heads in 314D and NR13 are Khmer. All of them are Buddhists by religion.

4. Educational attainment of the sample AH Heads 70. Majority (49.02% or 25 persons) of the 51 male respondents in 314D went to high school but did not graduate, while 11 (21.57%) of the male respondents only reached primary school. 4 (7.84%) did not attend school. Among the 26 women AH heads, 9 (34.62%) went to high school but did not graduate, and only 1 did not attend school.

Table IV.8 Educational Attainment of Head of Sample AHs 314D Educational attainment Not Gender of Finished Commune Finished finished Total AH Head None Primary high Elementary high school school Male Kandieng Reay 2 4 1 7 1 15 Prasout 0 3 1 4 1 9 Preah Ponlea 0 0 0 1 0 1 Nhor 1 2 1 4 2 10 Ksetr 1 1 2 8 2 14 Thmei 0 1 0 1 0 2 Total 4 11 5 25 6 51

Educational attainment Not Gender of Finished Commune Finished finished Total AH Head None Primary high Elementary high school school Female Kandieng Reay 0 1 0 1 0 2 Prasout 1 0 1 1 0 3

Preah Ponlea 0 0 1 1 1 3

Nhor 0 4 2 0 1 7

Ksetr 0 1 1 4 0 6

Thmei 0 2 1 2 0 5

Total 1 8 6 9 2 26

71. In NR13, majority (48.61% or 35 persons) of the 72 male respondents attended high school but did not graduate, while 20 (27.78%) of the male respondents only reached primary school. Five(6.94%) did not attend school. None of the 14 women AH heads attended school, however.

Table IV.9 Educational Attainment of Head of Sample AHs NR13 Educational attainment Gender Not Colleg Finished Finished of AH Commune finished e Total None Primary Element high Head high gradua ary school school te Male Sangkhor 0 1 2 5 0 0 8 Kampong Chak 1 2 0 6 2 0 11 Sangkae 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 Chrung Popel 0 2 0 5 0 0 7 Kampong Ampil 0 1 3 2 0 0 6 Angk Prasrae 0 2 1 2 1 0 6 Andoung Pou 0 3 0 3 1 0 7 Kampong Trach 3 8 0 7 0 0 18 Amkpil 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 Andoung Trabaek 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Krabau 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 Total 5 20 6 35 4 2 72 Female Kampong Chak 3 3

Sangkae 4 4

Chrung Popel 1 1

Angk Prasrae 1 1

Kampong Trach 3 3

Amkpil 2 2

Total 14 14

5. Household size of the sample AHs 72. The 77 sample AHs in 314D are composed of 225 male and 155 female members. The average household size in 314D is 4.96. In NR13, the 86 sample AHs are made up of 214 male and 205 female members. The average household size in NR13 is 4.93.

30 31

Table IV.10 Number of Persons in the Sample AHs 314D Number of Persons in the AH Commune No of AH Average AH Size Male Female Kandieng Reay 52 34 17 5.1 Prasout 33 21 12 4.5 Preah Ponlea 5 8 4 3.3 Nhor 51 32 17 4.9 Ksetr 66 42 20 5.4 Thmei 18 18 7 5.1 Total 225 155 77 4.9

Table IV.11 Number of Persons in the Sample AHs NR13 Number of Persons in the Affected Average HH Commune Households No of HH Size Male Female Sangkhor 25 20 8 5.6 Kampong Chak 35 39 14 5.3 Sangkae 10 15 7 3.6 Chrung Popel 13 15 8 3.5 Kampong Ampil 18 12 6 5.0 Angk Prasrae 16 19 7 5.0 Andoung Pou 22 13 7 5.0 Kampong Trach 50 57 21 5.1 Amkpil 13 6 4 4.8 Andoung Trabaek 5 3 1 8.0 Krabau 7 6 3 4.3 Total 214 205 86 4.9

D. Economic situation: income and expenses of the sample AHs

1. 314D 73. Almost half (43.14% or 22 AHs) of the 51 sample male AH heads derive their main source of income from farming. Another 13 male-headed AHs (25.49%) are primarily involved in selling food and non-food items. While a significant percentage (34.62% or 9 persons) of the 26 sample women AH heads are earning through selling goods, an equally significant percentage (30.77% or 8 persons) are not involved in productive activities.

Table IV.12 Primary Sources of Income of Sample AH Heads 314D Primary Source of Income Gender None/ Factory/ Remittance of AH Commune retired/ Selling Private Total Farming shop (Cambodia Other* Head old/ goods employee worker ) sick Kandieng Male 0 9 3 0 1 0 2 15 Reay Prasout 0 3 4 1 0 0 1 9

Preah 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Ponlea Nhor 4 2 2 0 1 0 1 10

Primary Source of Income Gender None/ Factory/ Remittance of AH Commune retired/ Selling Private Total Farming shop (Cambodia Other* Head old/ goods employee worker ) sick Ksetr 1 7 4 0 0 0 2 14

Thmei 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2

Total 6 22 13 1 2 0 7 51

Female Kandieng 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 Reay Prasout 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 Preah 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 Ponlea Nhor 3 1 2 0 0 1 0 7 Ksetr 2 1 2 0 0 0 1 6 Thmei 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 5 Total 8 5 9 0 0 2 2 26 *Other: Motor bike and bicycle repair, and hair dresser.

74. More than half (53.0% or 27 AHs) of the 51 male-headed sample AHs reportedly have a monthly household income of less than $65/month for a family of 5 people in rural areas. Nine (17.65%) other male-headed AHs have monthly household income of $65 ~ $100. Similarly, half (50.0% or 13 AHs) of the 26 sample women-headed AH have a monthly household income below $65. Another 7 (26.92%) women-headed AHs live on the borderline of poverty.

Table IV.13 Combined Monthly Income of Sample AHs 314D Gender Combined Monthly Income of AHs of AH Commune < >$65 $101 ~ $201 ~ $301 ~ > Total Head $65 ~ $100 $200 $300 $500 $500 Male Kandieng Reay 2 6 4 1 1 1 15 Prasout 7 0 1 0 1 0 9 Preah Ponlea 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Nhor 7 0 3 0 0 0 10 Ksetr 10 2 2 0 0 0 14 Thmei 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 Total 27 9 11 1 2 1 51 Female Kandieng Reay 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 Prasout 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 Preah Ponlea 1 0 2 0 0 0 3 Nhor 4 2 0 1 0 0 7 Ksetr 2 2 1 1 0 0 6 Thmei 4 0 1 0 0 0 5 Total 13 7 4 2 0 0 26

75. It can be seen from table below that the sample AHs could only spend for their needs within the limits of their incomes. A number of them, however, are apparently spending beyond what they earn in a month and are probably in debt.

32 33

Table IV.14 Monthly Expenses of Sample AHs 314D Combined Monthly Expenses Gender of AH Commune < >$65 $101 ~ $201 ~ $301 ~ > Total Head $65 ~ $100 $200 $300 $500 $500 Male Kandieng Reay 1 5 4 3 1 1 15 Prasout 5 2 2 0 0 0 9 Preah Ponlea 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Nhor 4 3 3 0 0 0 10 Ksetr 4 7 3 0 0 0 14 Thmei 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 Total 15 17 14 3 1 1 51 Female Kandieng Reay 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 Prasout 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 Preah Ponlea 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 Nhor 3 3 1 0 0 0 7 Ksetr 3 1 1 1 0 0 6 Thmei 3 1 1 0 0 0 5 Total 13 6 6 1 0 0 26

2. NR13 76. The 3 most common primary livelihood of the 72 sample male AH heads are running repair shops/barber shops (33.33%), farming (30.56%), and selling food and non-food items (18.06%). While majority (42.86%) of the 14 sample women AH heads are earning through selling goods, an equally significant percentage (35.71%) are not involved in productive activities.

Table IV.15 Primary Sources of Income of Sample AHs NR13 Primary source(s) of income Gender Factor None/ live Sell Private Repair Tota of AH Commune Far y/ retire stoc good Govt emplo shop/ l Head m shop d k s yee barber worker Male Sangkhor 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 3 8 Kampong Chak 2 2 0 2 0 1 0 4 11 Sangkae 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 3 Chrung Popel 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 3 7 Kampong Ampil 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 6 Angk Prasrae 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 6 Andoung Pou 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 7 Kampong Trach 0 8 0 2 0 0 2 6 18 Amkpil 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 Andoung 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Trabaek Krabau 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 3 Total 2 22 0 13 0 9 2 24 72 Female Kampong Chak 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Sangkae 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4

Chrung Popel 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Angk Prasrae 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Kampong Trach 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 3

Primary source(s) of income Gender Factor None/ live Sell Private Repair Tota of AH Commune Far y/ retire stoc good Govt emplo shop/ l Head m shop d k s yee barber worker Amkpil 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2

Total 5 1 1 6 1 0 0 0 14

77. More than half (52.78% or 38 AHs) of the 72 male-headed sample AHs reportedly have a monthly household income of less than $65/month. 12 (16.67%) other male-headed AHs have a monthly household income of $65 ~ $100. In contrast, only 4 (28.57%) of the 14 sample women-headed AH have a monthly household income below $65. Five(35.71%) women-headed AHs reportedly earn a monthly income of $101 ~ $200. The amount of poor people will be confirmed during Detailed Measurement Survey and updating the RP based on appropriate poverty line.

Table IV.16 Combined Monthly Income of Sample AHs IR13 Gender Combined Monthly Income of AHs of AH Commune < >$65 $101 ~ $201 ~ $301 ~ > Total Head $65 ~ $100 $200 $300 $500 $500 Male Sangkhor 3 2 1 1 1 0 8 Kampong Chak 7 0 2 0 1 1 11 Sangkae 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 Chrung Popel 5 2 0 0 0 0 7 Kampong Ampil 5 0 1 0 0 0 6 Angk Prasrae 2 3 0 0 0 1 6 Andoung Pou 4 2 1 0 0 0 7 Kampong Trach 5 2 6 1 2 2 18 Amkpil 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 Andoung Trabaek 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Krabau 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 Total 38 12 12 2 4 4 72 Female Kampong Chak 1 1 0 0 1 0 3 Sangkae 2 0 1 1 0 0 4 Chrung Popel 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Angk Prasrae 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Kampong Trach 1 0 2 0 0 0 3 Amkpil 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 Total 4 2 5 1 1 1 14

78. It can be seen from table below that a number of the sample AHs spend beyond what they earn in a month. It can only be surmised that they are in constant debt.

Table IV.17 Monthly Expenses of Sample AHs IR13 Combined Monthly Expenditure Gender of >$65 Commune < $101 ~ $201 ~ $301 ~ > Total AH Head ~ $65 $200 $300 $500 $500 $100 Sangkhor 1 4 3 0 0 0 8 Male Kampong Chak 5 2 3 1 0 0 11

34 35

Combined Monthly Expenditure Gender of >$65 Commune < $101 ~ $201 ~ $301 ~ > Total AH Head ~ $65 $200 $300 $500 $500 $100 Sangkae 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 Chrung Popel 4 3 0 0 0 0 7 Kampong Ampil 2 2 1 1 0 0 6 Angk Prasrae 1 3 0 1 1 0 6 Andoung Pou 1 2 3 1 0 0 7 Kampong Trach 4 2 6 3 3 0 18 Amkpil 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 Andoung Trabaek 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Krabau 0 0 1 1 0 1 3 Total 20 21 18 8 4 1 72 Kampong Chak 1 1 1 0 3

Sangkae 1 2 1 0 4

Chrung Popel 0 1 0 0 1

Female Angk Prasrae 0 1 0 0 1

Kampong Trach 1 0 2 0 3

Amkpil 0 1 0 1 2

Total 3 6 4 1 14

E. Amenities of the sample AHs

1. 314D 79. Health and sanitation. Most of the 77 sample AHs in 314D have their own well for drinking (86.0%) and washing (83.0%). However, 40.0% (31 AHs) do not have a toilet in their homes. Relatedly, 64.0% of the AHs have no bathrooms. Moreover, most (88.0%) of the AHs burn or bury their refuse. Table IV.18 Main Source of Potable Water of the AHs314D Source of potable water Commune Total Own well Public well Neighbor wells Kandieng Reay 16 0 1 17 Prasout 8 1 3 12 Preah Ponlea 3 0 1 4 Nhor 16 0 1 17 Ksetr 16 0 4 20 Thmei 7 0 0 7 Total 66 1 10 77

Table IV.19 Main Source of Water for Washing of the AHs 314D Water for washing/bathing Commune Total Own well Public well Neighbor wells Kandieng Reay 15 0 2 17 Prasout 8 1 3 12 Preah Ponlea 2 0 2 4 Nhor 16 0 1 17 Ksetr 16 0 4 20 Thmei 7 0 0 7 Total 64 1 12 77

Table IV.20 Toilet Facilities Used by the AHs 314D Toilet facilities Commune Total Water-sealed Open pit None Kandieng Reay 11 1 5 17 Prasout 7 0 5 12 Preah Ponlea 3 0 1 4 Nhor 10 1 6 17 Ksetr 10 0 10 20 Thmei 3 0 4 7 Total 44 2 31 77

Table IV.21 Bathing Facilities Used by the AHs 314D Bathing facilities Commune Total Own bathroom None Kandieng Reay 7 10 17 Prasout 1 11 12 Preah Ponlea 1 3 4 Nhor 10 7 17 Ksetr 6 14 20 Thmei 3 4 7 Total 28 49 77

Table IV.22 Garbage Disposal Used by the AHs 314D Garbage Disposal Used Commune Dumped by AH on Burned/buried by Total Collected wasteland AH Kandieng Reay 2 1 14 17 Prasout 0 2 10 12 Preah Ponlea 0 0 4 4 Nhor 1 0 16 17 Ksetr 0 2 18 20 Thmei 0 1 6 7 Total 3 6 68 77

80. Power for lighting and fuel for cooking. Except for 1, the rest of the 77 sample AHs in 314D get electricity for lighting the public service provider. Wood is the most commonly used fuel for cooking among the AHs.

Table IV.23 Main Source of Power for Lighting 314D Main source of power for lighting Commune Total Rechargeable battery Public electricity Kandieng Reay 0 17 17 Prasout 1 11 12 Preah Ponlea 0 4 4 Nhor 0 17 17 Ksetr 0 20 20 Thmei 0 7 7 Total 1 76 77

36 37

Table IV.24 Main Source of Fuel for Cooking 314D Main source of Fuel for cooking Commune Total Wood Gas Kandieng Reay 16 1 17 Prasout 12 0 12 Preah Ponlea 3 1 4 Nhor 15 2 17 Ksetr 20 0 20 Thmei 6 1 7 Total 72 5 77

81. Household appliances and transportation. Television set is the most common household appliance, with 65 (84.0%) of the AHs owning one. Next is electric fan (75%), followed by hand phone (74%). Majority of the 77 sample AHs own a bicycle (84.0%) and a motorbike (81.0%).

Table IV.25 Household Appliances 314D Household Appliances Radio/ Commune DVD/ Oven/ Electri Comp TV Ref casset Phone Plows CD stove c fan uter te Kandieng Reay 17 2 8 13 11 1 14 3 0 Prasout 8 2 6 9 3 0 6 2 1 Preah Ponlea 2 0 1 4 1 0 3 0 0 Nhor 13 0 3 10 9 2 13 1 2 Ksetr 19 1 9 15 13 0 15 1 1 Thmei 6 0 2 6 4 1 7 1 0 Total 65 5 29 57 41 4 58 8 4

Table IV.26 Ownership of Transportation 314D Transportation Commune Bicycle Motorbike None Car Truck Other* Kandieng Reay 16 15 0 0 1 1 Prasout 10 7 3 1 1 1 Preah Ponlea 2 3 1 0 0 0 Nhor 13 14 2 0 0 0 Ksetr 19 17 1 1 0 1 Thmei 5 6 0 0 0 0 Total 65 62 7 2 2 3 *Other: Koyon, Oxcarts

2. NR13 82. Health and sanitation. Majority of the 86 sample AHs in NR13 have their own well for drinking (58.0%) and washing (56.0%). However, 57.0% (49 AHs) do not have a toilet in their homes. Relatedly, 65.0% of the AHs have no bathrooms. Moreover, most (95.0%) of the AHs burn or bury their refuse.

Table IV.27 Main Source of Potable Water of the AHs NR13 Source of potable water Commune Buy from Neighbor's Total Own well Public well retailers Well Sangkhor 5 0 0 3 8 Kampong Chak 10 0 0 4 14 Sangkae 6 0 0 1 7 Chrung Popel 4 0 0 4 8 Kampong Ampil 3 2 0 1 6 Angk Prasrae 2 2 1 2 7 Andoung Pou 2 1 1 3 7 Kampong Trach 11 1 0 9 21 Amkpil 4 0 0 0 4 Andoung Trabaek 1 0 0 0 1 Krabau 2 0 0 1 3 Total 50 6 2 28 86

Table IV.28 Main Source of Water for Washing of the AHs NR13 Water for washing/bathing Commune Buy from Neighbor's Total Own well Public well retailers Well Sangkhor 5 0 0 3 8 Kampong Chak 10 0 0 4 14 Sangkae 6 0 0 1 7 Chrung Popel 4 0 0 4 8 Kampong Ampil 3 2 0 1 6 Angk Prasrae 2 2 1 2 7 Andoung Pou 2 0 1 4 7 Kampong Trach 11 1 0 9 21 Amkpil 3 1 0 0 4 Andoung Trabaek 1 0 0 0 1 Krabau 1 1 0 1 3 Total 48 7 2 29 86

Table IV.29 Toilet Facilities Used by the AHs NR13 Toilet facilities Commune Total Water-sealed Open pit None Others Sangkhor 3 0 3 2 8 Kampong Chak 6 0 8 0 14 Sangkae 4 0 3 0 7 Chrung Popel 2 0 6 0 8 Kampong Ampil 1 1 4 0 6 Angk Prasrae 2 2 3 0 7 Andoung Pou 0 0 7 0 7 Kampong Trach 6 2 13 0 21 Amkpil 3 0 1 0 4 Andoung Trabaek 1 0 0 0 1 Krabau 2 0 1 0 3 Total 30 5 49 2 86

38 39

Table IV.30 Bathing Facilities Used by the AHs NR13 Bathing facilities Commune Total Own bathroom None Sangkhor 3 5 8 Kampong Chak 6 8 14 Sangkae 4 3 7 Chrung Popel 1 7 8 Kampong Ampil 1 5 6 Angk Prasrae 3 4 7 Andoung Pou 0 7 7 Kampong Trach 6 15 21 Amkpil 3 1 4 Andoung Trabaek 1 0 1 Krabau 2 1 3 Total 30 56 86

Table IV.31 Garbage Disposal Used by the AHs NR13 Disposal - Dumped by Disposal - Burned/ Commune Total AH on wasteland buried by AH Sangkhor 0 8 8 Kampong Chak 0 14 14 Sangkae 1 6 7 Chrung Popel 0 8 8 Kampong Ampil 0 6 6 Angk Prasrae 1 6 7 Andoung Pou 0 7 7 Kampong Trach 2 19 21 Amkpil 0 4 4 Andoung Trabaek 0 1 1 Krabau 0 3 3 Total 4 82 86

83. Power for lighting and fuel for cooking. While majority (56.0%) of the 86 sample AHs get electricity from the public service provider, the rest of the sample AHs still use rechargeable car batteries for lighting and running electric appliances. All 86 sample AHs use wood for cooking, although some of them also use gas and electricity. Table IV.32 Main Source of Power for Lighting NR13 Main source of power for lighting Commune Total Rechargeable battery Public electricity Sangkhor 0 8 8 Kampong Chak 3 11 14 Sangkae 3 4 7 Chrung Popel 7 1 8 Kampong Ampil 6 0 6 Angk Prasrae 4 3 7 Andoung Pou 7 0 7 Kampong Trach 6 15 21 Amkpil 2 2 4 Andoung Trabaek 0 1 1

Main source of power for lighting Commune Total Rechargeable battery Public electricity Krabau 0 3 3 Total 38 48 86

Table IV.33 Main Source of Fuel for Cooking NR13 Main source of Fuel for Cooking Commune Total Wood Electricity Gas Cow Dung Sangkhor 8 4 2 0 8 Kampong Chak 14 3 0 1 14 Sangkae 7 1 2 1 7 Chrung Popel 8 0 1 0 8 Kampong Ampil 6 0 2 0 6 Angk Prasrae 7 0 2 0 7 Andoung Pou 7 0 1 0 7 Kampong Trach 21 2 6 0 21 Amkpil 4 1 1 0 4 Andoung Trabaek 1 0 0 0 1 Krabau 3 2 3 0 3 Total 86 13 20 2 86

84. Household appliances and transportation. The hand phone is the most common household appliance, with 79.0% of the AHs owning one. Next is a television set (78.0%), followed by electric fan (43.0%). Majority of the 86 sample AHs own a bicycle (77.0%) and a motorbike (71.0%).

Table IV.34 Household Appliances NR13 Appliances Commune Radio/ DVD/ Oven/ Electric TV Phone Computer Iron cassette CD stove fan Sangkhor 8 2 6 5 2 8 1 0 Kampong Chak 12 2 10 3 1 8 1 0 Sangkae 7 5 6 4 2 2 0 0 Chrung Popel 7 2 6 4 3 1 0 0 Kampong Ampil 6 0 6 2 3 4 0 0 Angk Prasrae 3 1 7 1 1 3 0 0 Andoung Pou 5 0 4 1 2 0 0 0 Kampong Trach 11 2 15 6 3 7 0 2 Amkpil 4 1 4 4 0 1 0 0 Andoung Trabaek 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 Krabau 3 1 3 3 1 2 0 0 Total 67 16 68 34 18 37 2 2

Table IV.35 Ownership of Transportation NR13 Means of Transportations Commune Bicycle Motorbike None Car Truck Sangkhor 8 8 0 0 0 Kampong Chak 12 12 2 0 0 Sangkae 6 5 1 0 0 Chrung Popel 7 5 1 0 0 Kampong Ampil 5 6 1 0 0

40 41

Means of Transportations Commune Bicycle Motorbike None Car Truck Angk Prasrae 4 5 3 1 0 Andoung Pou 5 2 2 0 0 Kampong Trach 15 12 6 3 2 Amkpil 2 2 2 0 0 Andoung Trabaek 1 1 0 0 0 Krabau 1 3 2 0 0 Total 66 61 20 4 2

V. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION

85. Participation provides for the occasion and the process by which stakeholders influence and become co-responsible for development initiatives and decisions that affect them. Through participation, the needs and priorities of the local population are ventilated; the adverse social impacts of the Project, including the corresponding mitigating measures, are collectively identified; and the commitment and feeling of ownership over the Project is engendered among the APs.

A. Participatory activities in RP Planning and Implementation

86. The public, especially the AHs, the local governments and road users will be consulted and their opinions solicited, and will in fact participate in the preparation, updating, and implementation of the resettlement plan. Table below summarizes the roles and responsibilities of the Executing Agency, the local governments, and the AHs in the preparation, updating, and implementation of the resettlement plan.

Table V.1 Roles and Responsibilities of Key Stakeholders in the RP Project Process Participatory Activities and Participants Responsible Institution Stage Preparation

Pre-feasibility/ Briefing of the provincial, district, commune, and PMU3 and Consultants Feasibility village officials; PDWT; and stakeholders about the Project TA, the resettlement policy, and the activities of the consultants

Conduct of IOL, census of APs, social impact Consultants, assisted by assessment, and replacement cost study (RCS) commune/village officials

Discussion with Resettlement Department Ministry of Consultants Economy and Finance (RD-MEF) and ESO about the proposed Project resettlement policy

Initial disclosure meeting with AHs to discuss the Consultants, assisted by results of the IOL and gather suggestions on how to commune/village officials minimize and mitigate impacts, and discuss about relocation options.

Project Process Participatory Activities and Participants Responsible Institution Stage Drafting of the resettlement plan and project Consultants information leaflet 5 and submission to PMU3, RD-MEF, and ADB for review and approval.

Distribution of information leaflets to AHs, posting of PMU3, IRC-WG and ESO summary resettlement plan at district and sub-district local government offices ADB Posting on the ADB website Updating and Implementation

Drafting/Finalization Set-up resettlement coordinating committee IRC through RD-MEF of Technical Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS), updating unit IRC-WG and PRSC-WG, Design costs (as necessary) assisted by Consultants

Second disclosure meeting/consultation with APs to IRC-WG and PRSC-WG, discuss results of DMS and discuss the resettlement assisted by Consultants policy, entitlements and relocation options

Updating/revision of the resettlement plan and the ESO, assisted by project information leaflet Consultants

Submission of updated resettlement plan and project PMU3 information leaflet to RD-MEF and PMU3 for approval and endorsement to ADB

Distribution of the updated information leaflets to the IRC-WG and ESO, AHs and posting of summary updated resettlement assisted by PRSC-WG plan at district and commune offices

Implementation of Updated resettlement plan IRC-WG and ESO with assistance of PRSC-WG

Monitoring of resettlement plan implementation ESO (internal) and RD-MEF (external) through external monitoring organization EMO)

B. Public consultations during RP preparation

87. The resettlement survey team conducted consultations in the affected districts prior to the IOL and SES activities. The agenda of the consultations included (a) explaining to local officials and residents what the TA was all about; (b) introducing the members of the survey team, the reasons for the survey and the schedule for the conduct of the same, including the policy on

5 The Project information leaflet, written in Khmer, contains the following brief information: (i) Project background, specifically about the civil works to be done; (ii) results of the IOL; (iii) entitlements due to the AHs; (iv) bases for computing compensation for affected assets; (v) schedule of delivery of entitlements and displacement; (vi) grievance redress mechanism; and (vii) contact persons at PMU3. (See Appendix 5 for the draft leaflet).

42 43 cut-off date for eligibility to Project entitlements; and, (c) identifying the major project stakeholders in the districts and getting their views regarding the road improvement project, including their suggestions on how to avoid and minimize adverse impacts. A total of 199 local officials and residents participated in the consultations, 60 of whom were women. (See Appendix 4 for the highlights and list of participants to the pre-IOL consultations).

Table G-V.2 Dates of Pre-IOL Consultations Location of Number of Participants No Road Section Date of Meeting Meeting (District) Male Female Total 1 314D 20 May 2011 Svay Tep 12 01 13 2 314D 21 May 2011 Kampong Ro 19 01 20 3 NR13 21 May 2011 Rom Duol 27 16 43 4 NR13 22 May 2011 Romeas Haek 20 01 21 5 NR13 24 May 2011 Kamchay Mear 40 36 76 6 NR13 25 May 2011 Svay Rieng 21 05 26 Total Participants 139 60 199

88. Following the conclusion of the IOL and SES, the resettlement survey team returned to the affected districts to hold a second round of consultations, specifically with the AHs. The agenda of said consultations included (a) highlights of the results of IOL, such as information on the types and magnitude of impacts; (b) discussion of basic resettlement principles to be used in the project, such as compensation at replacement cost, public participation, and grievance redress; and, (c) finding out from the AHs what their views and suggestions are regarding compensation, allowances and assistance, relocation of structures, grievance redress, and participation. A total of 525 persons participated in the post-IOL consultations, 234 of whom were women. See Appendix 4 for the highlights and list of participants to the post-IOL consultations).

Table V.3 Dates of Post-IOL Consultations Location of Number of Participants No Road Section Date of Meeting Meeting (District) Male Female Total 1 NR - 314D 20 June 2011 Svay Tep 29 49 78 2 NR - 314D 20 June 2011 Kampong Ro 30 13 43 3 NR - 13 21 June 2011 Rom Duol 33 27 60 4 NR - 13 21 June 2011 Romeas Haek 35 30 65 5 NR - 13 22 June 2011 Kamchay Mear 35 36 71 6 NR - 13 22 June 2011 Svay Rieng 130 79 209 Total Participants 292 234 525

C. Disclosure of the Resettlement Plan

89. The resettlement plan has been disclosed to affected households by way of public information meetings and dissemination of the public information brochure (attached as an annex to the resettlement plan). Translated copies of the resettlement plan (key isssues) have also been disseminated to each district and commune office within the project areas and are to be AHs accessible. The resettlement plan is also uploaded on the project website of the Ministry of Public Works and Transport as well as ADB’s website.

D. Consultation and Information Disclosure during RP Implementation

90. Consultation with AHs will continue during resettlement plan updating up to implementation or resettlement. Particular attention will be given to the poor and other vulnerable AHs. All consultation and disclosure activities will be properly documented; minutes of

44 45 meetings, photos, and attendance sheets will be prepared and recorded.

91. Disclosure of the updated RP to AHs will be undertaken through each Commune Office in the project areas (where it will be made available for AH reading). MPWT (through the PMU3 and ESO) will disclose the final updated resettlement plan approved by the Government and the ADB and any revisions to the updated resettlement plan as a result of changes in scope or design layout. Key information in the updated resettlement plan to be disclosed to the commune office include (a) relocation and rehabilitation options, (b) entitlements, (c) grievance procedures, (d) schedule of delivery of assistance, and (e) displacement schedule. The information will be made publicly available at MPWT, district, and commune offices and will be provided to the AHs in the form of a project information leaflet (see Appendix 5 for the Project information leaflet). Social monitoring reports will also be made available to the AHs and will be uploaded on the ADB website.

VI. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM

92. The objective the grievance redress provisions are to resolve complaints as quickly as possible and at the local level through a process of conciliation; and, if that is not possible, to provide clear and transparent procedures for appeal. AHs are entitled to lodge complaints regarding any aspect of the preparation and implementation of the RP. A well-defined grievance redress and resolution mechanism will be established to resolveAH grievances and complaints in a timely and satisfactory manner. All AHs will be made fully aware of their rights, and the detailed grievance redress procedures will be publicized through an effective public information campaign. The grievance redress process includes four stages:

a. First stage: AHs will present their complaints and grievances verbally or in writing to the village chief, commune chief or IRC and PRS working groups. The receiving agent will be obliged to provide immediate written confirmation of receiving the complaint. If after 15 days the aggrieved AH does not hear from the village and commune chiefs or the working groups, or if he/she is not satisfied with the decision taken in the first stage, the complaint may be brought to the District Office. b. Second stage: The District Office has 15 days within which to resolve the complaint to the satisfaction of all concerned. If the complaint cannot be solved at this stage, the District Office will bring the case to the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee. c. Third stage: The Provincial Grievance Redress Committee meets with the aggrieved party and tries to resolve the situation. The Committee may ask for a review of the DMS by the external monitor (IMO). Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Committee must make a written decision and submit copies to the MOWRAM, PDOWRAM, PDRD, EMA, PRS/IRC and the AH.

Final stage: If the aggrieved AH does not hear from the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee or is not satisfied, he/she will bring the case to Provincial Court. This is the final stage for adjudicating complaints. The Court will make a written decision and submit copies to the MOWRAM, PDOWRAM, EMA, PRS/IRC and the AH. If any party is still unsatisfied with the Provincial Court judgment, he/she can bring the case to a higher-level court.

VII. LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK

92. The legal and policy framework for addressing the adverse social impacts of the Project is provided by relevant policies and laws of the Royal Government of Cambodia and of the ADB.

A. Relevant Laws

1. 1993 Constitution 93. The 1993 Constitution of Cambodia sets two basic principles for land acquisition. The first is Article 44 which states that the “right to confiscate properties from any person shall be exercised only in the public interest as provided by law and shall require fair and just compensation in advance” (Article 44). The second principle is Article 20 which stipulates that “nobody shall be forced to transfer his or her ownership, if forcing is not necessary in the public interest and (if) no proper and just indemnity has been paid to the owner”. These two principles are also adhered to in almost all countries.

94. Articles 73 and 74 of the Constitution provide for special consideration and support to vulnerable people including mothers and children, the disabled and families of combatants who sacrificed their lives for the nation. Indigenous minorities however are not explicitly included in these two articles but included in the Land Law.

2. Land Law (2001) 95. The 2001 Land Law governs land and property rights in Cambodia. Based on the provisions of the 1993 Constitution, it defines the regime of ownership of immovable properties, such as land, trees and fixed structures.

96. The rights and responsibilities of the Government with respect to eminent domain are specified in the Land Law. The Government can acquire private land for public purposes but has to pay a fair and just compensation in advance of the land acquisition. The Land Law, Article 5, states that “No person may be deprived of his ownership, unless it is in the public interest. An ownership deprivation shall be carried out in accordance with the forms and procedures provided by law and regulations and after the payment of fair and just compensation in advance.”

97. Other provisions of the Land Law that are relevant to land acquisition, compensation and resettlement include:

a. Legal possession as defined by the Law is the sole basis for ownership, and all transfers or changes of rights of ownership shall be carried out in accordance with the required general rules for sale, succession, exchange and gift or by court decision. (Article 6)

b. Any regime of ownership of immovable property prior to 1979 shall not be recognized. (Article 7)

c. Only persons or legal entities of Khmer nationality are entitled to own land in Cambodia; or to buy or sell land. (Articles 8, 66)

d. State public land includes, among other categories, any property a) that has a natural origin, such as forests, courses and banks of navigable and floatable rivers or natural lakes; b) that is made available for public use such as roads, tracks, oxcart ways,

46 47

pathways, gardens, public parks and reserved land; or, c) that is allocated to render a public service, such as public schools, public hospitals or administrative buildings. (Article 15)

e. Persons that illegally occupy, possess or claim title to State public land cannot claim any compensation. This includes land established by the Government as public rights-of-way for roads and railways. Moreover, failure to vacate illegally occupied land in a timely manner is subject to fines and/or imprisonment. (Article 19)

f. Ownership of the lands is granted by the State to indigenous communities6 as collective ownership, including all the rights and protections enjoyed by private owners. The exercise of collective ownership rights are the responsibility of the traditional authorities and decision-making mechanisms of the indigenous community, according to their customs and subject to laws such as the law on environmental protection. (Article 26)

g. No authority outside the community may acquire any rights to immovable properties belonging to an indigenous community. (Article 28)

h. Persons with legally valid possession of land for five years (at the time the law came into effect) are allowed to be registered as the owner of the land (Article 30). Persons who (at the time the law came into effect) held legal possession but had not yet completed the five years were allowed to remain in possession until they were eligible to be registered as the owner. (Article 31)

i. However, temporary possession claims made by persons after the law comes into effect will not be recognized, rescinding a previous right under the 1992 Land Law for acquiring land by taking possession. (Articles 29, 34)

j. Landless people may apply for land for residential and subsistence farming purposes at no cost, as part of a social land concessions scheme. The concessionaire may obtain ownership of this land after fulfilling conditions set out in a separate Sub-Decree on Social Land Concessions. (Articles 50, 51)

k. Acquisition of land through gifts is permitted with the following conditions: (i) the gift of immovable property is only effective if it is made in writing and registered with the Cadastral Registry Unit; (ii) once accepted, gifts of immovable property are irrevocable; and, (iii) the donor may retain the right of usufruct in the property, and the right of use and habitation of an immovable property. (Articles 80-84)

3. Other relevant laws and edicts 98. In addition to the Land Law, there are also other laws, decrees, sub-decrees and other regulations and guidelines that may be relevant to the resettlement in design and implementation

6As per Article 23 of the Land Law, “An indigenous community is a group of people that resides in Cambodia whose members manifest ethnic, social, cultural and economic unity and who practice a traditional lifestyle, and who cultivate the lands in their possession according to the customary rules of collective use”

48 of subprojects under the Project. The Sub-Decree on Social Concessions, enforced on 19 March 2003, provides legal basis for allocations of State private land for purposes of the alleviation of landlessness and poverty, including the replacement of land lost in the context of involuntary resettlement.

99. The private ownership of land was re-established in 1989, and confirmed in the 2001 Land Law (Article4). Cambodians are able to register the land they occupy with the local Cadastral Administration Office, whereupon a certificate of land title is granted. Issuing land titles is a lengthy process and most offices have a major backlog of applications. People are given a receipt and until the official title deed is issued, this receipt is accepted as title for land purpose or sale.

100. The present legal status of land use in Cambodia can be classified as follows:

a. Privately owned land with title: The owner has official title to land, and both owner and the Cadastral Administration Office have a copy of the deed. b. Privately owned land without title: The owner has make application for title to land, and is waiting for the issuance of a title deed. The Cadastral Administration Office recognizes the owner. c. Land use rights certified by the Government: In this case, a receipt for long-term land use has been issued. This land use right is recognized by the Cadastral Administration Office. d. Lease land: The Government or private owners lease the land, usually for a short period. There is provision for the owner to reclaim land if it is needed for development. e. Non-legal occupation: The user has no land use rights to State land that he occupies or uses. The Cadastral Administration Office does not recognize the use of this land.

100. Prakas No. 6, entitled “Measures to Crack Down on Anarchic Land Grabbing and Encroachments”, sets a ROW of 50 m for NR 2, 3, 6, and 7, and a ROW of 60 m for NR 1, 4, 5, 11, 22, 64, and 78. Exceptions are made for urban areas traversed by these national roads, where the ROW can be reduced, subject to the decision of the Government. In support of this Prakas, the Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF) on 6 April 2000 issued Decree No. 961 prohibiting compensation for structures and other assets located in the road ROW.

101. Prakas No. 6 must have been prompted by the influx of people inside the road ROW following the ouster from power of the Khmer Rouge in 1979 after a reign of four years. During that short period, private property was abolished and all land records destroyed. The years that followed after 1979 until the restoration of private property in 1989 were very disorderly, often chaotic, exacerbated by more armed conflicts. Returning people who were forced to do manual farm labor during the Khmer Regime occupied any vacant or empty property they could find along the road and in town centers. To make the re-occupation of abandoned properties and the distribution of land more systematic, the post-1979 government introduced usufruct rights, organizing families in rural areas into groups that collectively owned land and assets. Each group of families had a head, and land was distributed to individual families according to fertility.

4. Expropriation Law 101. The Expropriation Law, passed by the National Assembly on 29 December 2009 and promulgated by the King on 04 February 2010, contains 8 Chapters with 39 Articles. It provides

48 49 clear procedures on acquiring private properties for national and public interests. Key Articles of the Law are listed below.

a. Article 2: the law has the following purposes: (i) ensure reasonable and just deprivation of a legal right to ownership of private property; (ii) ensure payment of reasonable and just prior compensation; (iii) serve the public and national interests; and (iv) development of public physical infrastructure. Article 7:

b. Only the State may carry out an expropriation for use in the public and national interests. c. Article 8: the State shall accept the purchase of part of the real property left over from an expropriation at a reasonable and just price at the request of the owner of and/or the holder of right in the expropriated real property who is unable to live near the expropriated scheme or to build a residence or conduct any business. d. Article 12: an expropriation committee shall be established and headed by a representative from the Ministry of Economy and Finance and composed of representatives from relevant ministries and institutions. The organization and functioning of the expropriation committee shall be determined by a sub-decree. e. Article 22: an amount of compensation to be paid to the owner of and/or holder of rights in the real property shall be based on the market value of the real property or the alternative value as of the date of the issuance of the Prakas on the expropriation scheme. The market value or the alternative value shall be determined by an independent commission or agent appointed by the expropriation committee.

B. ADB Policies

102. The objectives of the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) are (a) to avoid impacts on people and the environment, where possible; (b) where avoidance is not possible, minimize, mitigate, or compensate for adverse project impacts on the environment and the affected people; and (c) help the executing agency strengthen its safeguard system. Towards this end, ADB resettlement policy includes the following principles:

a. Screen the project early on to identify past, present, and future involuntary resettlement impacts and risks. Determine the scope of resettlement planning through a survey and/or census of affected persons, including a gender analysis, specifically related to resettlement impacts and risks.

b. Improve, or at least restore, the livelihoods of all affected persons through (i) land-based resettlement strategies when affected livelihoods are land based where possible or cash compensation at replacement value for land when the loss of land does not undermine livelihoods, (ii) prompt replacement of assets with access to assets of equal or higher value, (iii) prompt compensation at full replacement cost for assets that cannot be restored, and (iv) additional revenues and services through benefit sharing schemes where possible.

c. Provide physically and economically affected persons with needed assistance, including the following: (i) if there is relocation, secured tenure to relocation land, better housing at resettlement sites with comparable access to employment and production opportunities, integration of resettled persons economically and socially into their host communities, and extension of project benefits to host communities; (ii)

transitional support and development assistance, such as land development, credit facilities, training, or employment opportunities; and (iii) civic infrastructure and community services, as required.

d. Improve the standards of living of the affected poor and other vulnerable groups, including women, to at least national minimum standards. In rural areas provide them with legal and affordable access to land and resources, and in urban areas provide them with appropriate income sources and legal and affordable access to adequate housing.

e. Develop procedures in a transparent, consistent, and equitable manner if land acquisition is through negotiated settlement.

f. Ensure that affected persons without titles to land or any recognizable legal rights to land are eligible for resettlement assistance and compensation for loss of non-land assets.

g. Prepare a resettlement plan elaborating on affected persons’ entitlements, the income and livelihood restoration strategy, institutional arrangements, monitoring and reporting framework, budget, and time-bound implementation schedule.

h. Prepare a resettlement plan elaborating on affected persons’ entitlements, the income and livelihood restoration strategy, institutional arrangements, monitoring and reporting framework, budget, and time-bound implementation schedule.

i. Disclose a draft resettlement plan, including documentation of the consultation process in a timely manner, before project appraisal, in an acceptable place and a form and language(s) understandable to affected persons and other stakeholders. Disclose the final resettlement plan and its updates to affected persons and other stakeholders.

j. Conceive and execute involuntary resettlement as part of a development project or program. Include the full costs of resettlement in the presentation of project’s cost and benefits. For a project with significant involuntary resettlement impacts, consider implementing the involuntary resettlement component of the project as a stand-alone operation.

k. Pay compensation and provide other resettlement entitlements before physical or economic displacement. Implement the resettlement plan under close supervision throughout project implementation.

l. Monitor and assess resettlement outcomes, their impacts on the standards of living of affected persons, and whether the objectives of the resettlement plan have been achieved by taking into account the baseline conditions and the results of resettlement monitoring. Disclose monitoring reports.

103. The objective of ADB Policy on Indigenous Peoplesas set out in the Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) is to design and implement projects in a way that fosters full respect for Indigenous Peoples’ identity, dignity, human rights, livelihood systems, and cultural uniqueness as defined by the Indigenous Peoples themselves so that they (i) receive culturally appropriate

50 51 social and economic benefits, (ii) do not suffer adverse impacts as a result of projects, and (iii) can participate actively in projects that affect them.

104. The ADB Policy on Gender and Development (2006) adopts gender mainstreaming as a key strategy for promoting gender equity, and for ensuring that women participate in and that their needs are explicitly addressed in the decision-making process for development activities. For projects that have the potential to have substantial gender impacts, a gender plan is prepared to identify strategies to address gender concerns and the involvement of women in the design, implementation and monitoring of the project.

C. Coping with the Resettlement Policies of Funding Agencies

105. In dealing with ODA funded projects, the Government has adapted on a project-by-project basis to the resettlement policies of donor agencies. Thus, starting in 1999 with the ADB-assisted Phnom Penh to Ho Chi Minh City Highway Improvement Project (Loan 1659-CAM), projects supported by such funding agencies are governed by the resettlement policies of these agencies and relevant laws and government regulations not consistent with the same are waived.

106. Table below summarizes how the resettlement policy ADB is applied in Cambodia.

Table VII.1Resettlement Policy and Its Application in Cambodia ADB Policy Application in Cambodia \ ADB Policy Resettlement Work Involuntary Resettlement Policy is applied to ADB’s Involuntary Resettlement Policy is being applied all development projects resulting in (i) loss of to ADB-financed projects in Cambodia. productive assets, including land, income and livelihood; (ii) lost of housing, possibly entire community structure, systems, and service; (iii) loss of other assets; loss of community resources, habitat, cultural sites, and goods. Involuntary resettlement should be avoided Involuntary resettlement has been avoided as much as where feasible. possible through consideration of alternative project locations and narrowing the irrigation ROWs to a designated corridor of impact (COI) and realigning the COI. Where population displacement is Various project options (e.g. bypass road design) have unavoidable, all viable project options should been explored to minimize displacement to as few be explored to minimize displacement. households as possible. People unavoidably affected should be Land-for-land is offered in some cases, though not all compensated and assisted so that their affected persons who lost land have been allocated a economic and social future would be generally relocation site. Cash compensation for affected house, as favorable as it would have been in the trees and other structures and privately owned land. absence of the project. Additional assistance is given to female headed, disabled, elderly, and very poor households, and cost of removal and transport of salvage materials. Some rehabilitation assistance has been given but not yet specified to restore to pre-project level. Future job opportunities at relocation sites have not generally been considered, with some exceptions. Compensation paid does not ensure income restoration and living standards, with a few exceptions. Existing social and cultural institutions of The existing social and economic situations of the re-settlers and their hosts should be supported affected persons and their hosts have, in some cases, and used to the greatest extent possible, and been supported, but not consistently applied. re-settlers should be integrated economically and socially into host communities. The full cost of resettlement and compensation Compensation costs are budgeted in projects funded should be included in the presentation of by the Banks. It is not possible to determine if this is project costs and benefits. consistently applied in non-bank-funded projects. The absence of a formal legal title to land by Absence of legal title to land has not been a some affected groups should not be a bar to determining factor in compensation payments, as long compensation; particular attention should be as the AHs are outside of the ROW and other state paid to households headed by women and land. It is against the law to compensate for ROW other vulnerable groups,, and appropriate land; however, such compensation has been paid on assistance provided to help improve their some ADB-financed projects as agricultural land use status. assistance7.

7 Land use assistance is provided for productive land in the ROW.

52 53

VIII. ENTITLEMENTS, ASSISTANCE AND BENEFITS

107. The Project resettlement policy has been developed taking into account the types, characteristics, and severity of Project impacts on assets and living conditions of the affected population, guided by the Constitution of the Royal Government of Cambodia, prevailing legal and government procedures and policies, not to mention resettlement policies adopted by the government for specific development projects funded by the ADB.

A. Objectives

108. The paramount objective of the Project Resettlement Policy is to ensure that AHs are not worse off because of the Project. The Project should provide an opportunity for the local population to derive benefits from it, and it should likewise serve as an occasion for the local population to participate in its planning and implementation, thereby engendering a sense of ownership over the same.

B. Key Principles

109. Cognizant of the aforementioned, the Royal Government of Cambodia commits itself to the following principles in the implementation of the Project road:

a. Acquisition of land and other assets, and resettlement of people will be avoided or minimized as much as possible by identifying possible alternative project designs and appropriate social, economic, operational and engineering solutions that have the least impact on the population. b. No land acquisition or site clearing will be done inside the ROW in anticipation or ahead of it being considered for implementation under the Project. Relatedly, no land acquisition or site clearing will be done inside the ROW until and after the RP has been updated and approved both by Royal Government of Cambodia and the ADB, and until and after all entitlements due to the AHs as provided for in this resettlement policy have been delivered. c. AHs will be eligible for compensation and rehabilitation assistance, irrespective of tenure status, social or economic standing and any such factors that may discriminate against achievement of the Project resettlement objective. Lack of legal rights to lost assets or adversely affected tenure status and social or economic status will not bar the AHs from entitlements to such compensation for non-land assets and rehabilitation measures or resettlement objectives. d. AHs residing, working, doing business and/or cultivating land within the Project impacted areas during the conduct of the IOL, to be validated or updated during the detailed measurement survey (DMS), are entitled to be compensated for their lost assets, incomes and businesses at replacement cost prevailing at the time of compensation, and, depending on the severity of impact on their livelihood and income capacity, will be provided with rehabilitation measures to improve or restore their pre-Project living standards, income-earning capacity and production levels. e. There will be no deductions in compensation payments for land, structures or other affected assets for salvage value, depreciation, taxes, stamp duties, fees or other payments.

f. If ownership over any affected asset is under dispute, the compensation for the same will be held in a court designated bank until its lawful owner is decided by competent legal authorities. g. AHs that lose only part of their physical assets will not be left with a portion that will be inadequate to sustain their current standard of living. The minimum size of remaining land and structures will be agreed between the MPWT, the Inter-Ministerial Resettlement Committee (IRC), and ADB during the updating of the RP and prior to the conduct of the detailed measurement survey (DMS). h. Shop owners will be assisted in gradually dismantling and setting up their shops in a new location to be agreed with the Provincial Resettlement Sub-committee-Working Group (PRSC-WG) in the residual area of the ROW and in a way that will allow them to gradually phase out their operation in their present location place and gradually begin their operation in their new place. Under this arrangement, disruption in the operation of shop owners will be minimized, thereby averting severe impact on the AHs’ livelihood. i. People presently cultivating plots inside the ROW will be allowed to continue cultivating the residual area of their cultivated plots in the ROW, if there is any. If during RP updating it is determined that the loss of these farmers is equivalent to 10% or more of their total livelihood or income from various sources, the PRSC-WG will assist in finding an affordable replacement land with similar productive attributes for the farmers to lease. j. Temporarily affected land and communal infrastructure will be restored to pre-project conditions. k. Project stakeholders, especially AHs, will be consulted and given the opportunity to participate in matters that will have adverse impacts on their lives during the design, implementation and operation of the Project. l. Any acquisition of, or restriction on access to, resources owned or managed by the AHs as a common property, e.g., communal forest, communal farm, will be mitigated by arrangements that will ensure access of those AHs to equivalent resources on a continuing basis. Similarly, temporarily affected land and communal infrastructure will be restored to pre-Project conditions. m. Plans for the acquisition of land and other assets will be carried out in consultation with the AHs who will receive prior information of the compensation, relocation and other assistance available to them. n. There shall be an effective mechanism for hearing and resolving grievances during the planning, updating and implementation of the RP. o. Existing cultural and religious practices shall be respected and, to the extent possible, preserved. p. Special measures will be incorporated in the RP to protect socially and economically vulnerable groups who face greater risk of further hardship. These vulnerable groups include women-headed households, households headed by persons with disabilities, landless households, children and elderly people without support structures, and people living below poverty line. Appropriate assistance will be provided to help AHs belonging to any of these vulnerable groups improve their socio-economic status. q. Adequate resources will be identified and committed during the preparation of the RP. This includes sufficient budgetary support that is fully committed and made available

54 55

to cover resettlement costs within the agreed implementation period; and, adequate human resources for supervision, liaison and monitoring of land acquisition, resettlement and rehabilitation activities. r. Appropriate reporting, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms will be identified and set in place as part of the resettlement management system. s. The RP or its summary will be translated in Khmer and placed in district and commune offices for the information of the AHs as well as other interested groups. t. Civil works contractors will not be issued notice of possession or notice to proceed (NTP) for any section or segment of the Project roads until (i) compensation has been satisfactorily completed for that area; (ii) agreed rehabilitation measures are in place; and (iii) the area is free from all encumbrances. The schedule of the start of civil works in any section or segment of the Project road will be coordinated and planned with the PRSC-WG whose members include male and women representatives of the AHs. C. Entitlements

110. For purposes of this resettlement plan (RP), the cut-off date coincides with the date the IOL was held which was preceded by a public meeting in the districts during which MPWT representatives and TA consultants briefed local officials and residents about the project, the compensation policy and the need to conduct the IOL, including the policy regarding cut-off date. The IOL in PR 314D and NR13 was carried out in on 20 May 2011 – 2 June 2011. The list of AHs will be updated and/or validated during the DMS following approval by project authorities of the project feasibility study. The Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee (IRC), the government body that is tasked to spearhead the conduct of the DMS and the implementation of the RP, will confirm the final date of the cut-off-date.

111. Based on the impacts identified during the IOL, the corresponding entitlements to be provided to the AHs are presented in the entitlement matrix below. It should be noted that these entitlements may be enhanced, as necessary, following the conduct of the DMS during RP in consultation with the AHs to ensure that their livelihoods are restored, if not improved

Table VIII.1 Entitlement Matrix Type of Application Eligible Entitlements Loss/Impacts Persons Loss of Land Partial loss; All AHs with AHs to be notified at least 3 months in advance of (all kinds) i.e., only a recognized the start of civil works in the locality. OUTSIDE the portion of the proof of For the affected portion of the land: cash ROW land of the AH is ownership who compensation at replacement cost (based on acquired by the will be affected findings of replacement cost study or RCS; in case Project and the by the there is no active market in the locality, based on residual expansion of productive capacity or attributes; without deduction un-affected is the CBF at for taxes and transaction costs) STILL VIABLE Prey Var and To the extent possible, AHs will be allowed to for continued the harvest their annual and perennial crops and timber use. construction of products prior to construction. by-pass road in If AH belongs to any of the vulnerable groups, see 3 AHs (at CBF) Chaung entitlements for vulnerable AHs below. Moung commune (PR150B) Entire land is All AHs with AHs to be notified at least 3 months in advance of lost; i.e., the recognized the start of civil works in the locality.

Type of Application Eligible Entitlements Loss/Impacts Persons whole land is proof of For the entire land: cash compensation at affected by the ownership who replacement cost (based on findings of Project, or the will be affected replacement cost study or RCS and updated to residual by the reflect prevailing market rates at the time of un-affected is expansion of compensation; in case there is no active market in NO LONGER the CBF at the locality, based on productive capacity or VIABLE for Prey Vor attributes; without deduction for taxes and continued use transaction costs) and, therefore, To the extent possible AHs will be allowed to the entire land harvest their annual and perennial crops and timber will be acquired products prior to construction. by the Project. If during RP updating, farmer AHs are found to be severely affected (i.e., the loss is equivalent to 10% 1 AH (at CBF) or more of their total income capacity), the AH will be provided (i) rehabilitation assistancethrough an income restoration program (IRP) that will be planned by the Project with the active participation of the AHs; and (ii) one time assistance allowance of $200 per household. If AH belongs to any of the vulnerable groups, see entitlements for vulnerable AHs below. Loss of use of Partial loss; All AHs AHs to be notified at least 3 months in advance of Productive i.e., only a utilizing ROW the start of civil works in the locality. Land portion of the land for To the extent possible AHs will be allowed to INSIDE the land cultivated productive use harvest their crops prior to construction. ROW by the AH within AHs will be tolerated to cultivate the residual area the COI is of the ROW. affected. For the affected portion, cash assistance for loss of land use equivalent to $0.50/m2. (Identities of the If during RP updating, said farmers are found to be AHs will be severely affected (i.e., the loss is equivalent to 10% determined or more of their total income capacity), the AH will (i) during DMS and be assisted by the PRSC in finding affordable RP updating) replacement land with similar productive attributes for these farmers to lease; (ii) be provided rehabilitation assistance through an income restoration program (IRP) that will be planned by the Project with the active participation of the AHs; and (iii) one time assistance allowance of $200 per household. If AH belongs to any of the vulnerable groups, see entitlements for vulnerable AHs below. House, Partial loss of Owners with or AHs to be notified at least3 months in advance of House-cum-sto house, without the start of civil works in the locality. re; house-cum-sto acceptable For the affected portion, cash compensation at Independent re; proof of replacement cost (i.e., present cost of construction Shops independent ownership over materials in the locality, plus cost of labor and repair shop; i.e., only the land; with [i.e., 20% of the cost of labor and materials] of the a portion of the or without unaffected portion). AHs to get cash compensation main structure building permit at least 3 months ahead of civil works in the of the house, locality to provide them sufficient time to gradually house-and-store re-organize the house and/or shop, thereby , or shop is avoiding any disruption in the livelihood of the same. affected and the If AH belongs to any of the vulnerable groups, see remaining entitlements for vulnerable AHs below. unaffected portion is STILL Renters of said AHs to be notified at least 3 months in advance of structures the start of civil works in the locality.

56 57

Type of Application Eligible Entitlements Loss/Impacts Persons VIABLE for use. No other entitlements if not relocating and if business operation is not disrupted. Entire house, Owners with or AHs to be notified at least 3 months in advance of house-cum-sto without the start of civil works in the locality. re, store is acceptable Cash compensation at replacement cost for the lost ;i.e., entire proof of entire structure (i.e., present cost of construction main structure is ownership over materials and labor in the locality). AHs to get cash affected, or the the land; with compensation at least 3 months ahead of civil unaffected or without works in the locality to provide them sufficient time portion of the building permit to gradually re-organize the house and/or shop, main structure is thereby avoiding any disruption in the livelihood of NO LONGER the same. VIABLE for One time assistance allowance per household.as continued use. follows:  Houses and regular shops (i.e., can be closed with four walls) that will move back in residual area of the ROW: (i) $100 for affected house; and (ii) $33 for the affected regular store).  Houses and regular shops that will relocate outside the ROW: (i) $200 for affected house; and (ii) $100 for the affected regular store). Transportation (moving) allowance as follows:  Shops and stalls made of light and temporary materials: $20  Regular shops and houses moving into the residual area of the ROW: $40  Regular shops and houses relocating within the same village outside of the ROW: $60  Houses relocating in another village outside of the ROW: $70 Income loss allowance for AHs of entirely affected house-and-stores and independent shops:  Unregistered: Businesses owners who cannot show any tax receipt and cannot otherwise confirm income amount will be provided one-time cash assistance of $50  Cash compensation equivalent to the daily net income (as reflected in tax receipts) multiplied by the days of business disruption If landless, to be provided free of charge with substitute plot with an area of approximately 105 m² outside of the ROW and in a location acceptable to the AH, with secure tenure under the land concession law, accessible, with or close to source of potable water, and with latrine. If AH belongs to any of the vulnerable groups, see entitlements for vulnerable AHs below. Renters of AHs to be notified at least 3 months in advance of entirely the start of civil works in the locality. affected house Transportation (moving) allowance of $50 and One time assistance allowance of $33 per house-and-stor household. for relocating tenants of affected regular e shop and house. Rental allowance equivalent to 2 months of rent of a similar building in the locality.

Type of Application Eligible Entitlements Loss/Impacts Persons If AH belongs to any of the vulnerable groups, see entitlements for vulnerable AHs below. Miscellaneous/o Loss of, or Owners of the AHs to be notified at least 3 months in advance of ther structures damage to, structures with the start of civil works in the locality. (porch, assets or without Cash compensation at replacement cost for the extended eaves, acceptable affected assets (i.e., present cost of construction spirit house, proof of materials and labor in the locality). fence, etc.) ownership over the land; with or without building permit Crops and trees Loss of, or Owners AHs to be notified at least 3 months in advance of damage to, regardless of the start of civil works in the locality. assets tenure status To the extent possible, AHs will be allowed to harvest their annual and perennial crops prior to construction. Perennial and timber trees will be compensated in cash as per replacement cost study. Public Facilities Loss of, or Institutions that Institution to be notified at least 3 months in (Government-o damage to, own the advance of the start of civil works in the locality. wned structures) assets affected assets To be reconstructed, restored and/or relocated by the civil works contractor

Higher risks of Loss of house Vulnerable One time assistance allowance of $100 per hardship due to and shops, Groups: AHs household. project impacts paddy land belonging to Participate in income restoration program within the ROW one or more of the following vulnerable groups: (i) living below the poverty line; (ii) AHs headed by women and AHs headed by the elderly with no social support; and (iii) households that are headed by persons with disabilities; Impacts during Contractors will be responsible for paying rental in Construction cash for land outside the ROW which will be not less than the net income that would have been derived from the affected property during disruption. Restoration of land within 3 months after use. Non-land assets within the residual area of the ROW and/or outside of the ROW that are adversely impacted by construction activities will be compensated at replacement cost by the civil works contractor.

58 59

D. Strategy to address gender issues

112. The Project includes the following specific actions to address gender issues in the Project:

a. A male representative and a female representative of the AHs in a commune will seat in the district RSC-WG. b. In conducting the DMS, consultations on resettlement activities and relocation options, both women and men will participate in the discussions. c. Gender issues will be included in training on the Project resettlement policy that will be provided to concerned personnel of the PMU3, the ESO of MPWT, and the RSC-WGs. d. Special measures will be taken in the relocation of elderly, disabled and women-headed households in terms of location of new sites for affected shops and houses. e. Disaggregated monitoring indicators by gender will be developed for monitoring social benefits, economic opportunities, livelihood, and resettlement activities. E. Strategy to assist vulnerable households

113. As discusses in the preceding sections, on top of the compensation and applicable allowance that vulnerable AHs will receive for their losses as provided in the entitlement matrix, vulnerable AH, AHs are entitled to participate in the income restoration that will be designed with their active involvement.

114. The project will foster full participation of vulnerable households in meaningful consultations so that they are able to participate in decisions which affect them.

F. Unforeseen Impacts

115. If during the DMS, additional adverse social impacts are identified and/or additional AHs are found, these persons and households are entitled to receive Project entitlements as the others on condition that it can be ascertained that they have actually been in the Project ROW even before 20-15 May 2011 in 314D and on 26 May to 2 June 2011 in NR13, the cut-off date for eligibility8. New AHs that will emerge due to changes in Project design or alignment prior to or even during construction works are likewise entitled to the same entitlements as those of the other AHs.

IX. RELOCATION OF HOUSING AND SETTLEMENTS

A. Relocation Strategy

116. The PRSC-WG will endeavor to ensure minimal disruption in the livelihood activities of the owners of the 103 entirely affected independent shops (i.e., 45 in 314D, 1 in the CBF, and 57 in NR13); the 74 partially affected independent shops (i.e., 17 in 314D and 57 in NR13); the 3 entirely affected house-and-stores (i.e., 2 in 314D and 1 at the CBF); and 10 partially-affected

8To be confirmed by the IRC.

60 house-and-stores (i.e., 7 in 314D and 3 in NR13). Through the PRSC-WG the shop owners will be informed regarding the schedule of civil works in a specific section of 314D and NR13 at least 3 months in advance.

117. All AHs affected by the entire loss of their houses and shops can move behind the residual area of the ROW. If it is not possible for the AH to rebuild behind where their affected structures presently stand, the PRSC-WG, in consultation and with the active participation of the AHs, will look for a place elsewhere in the ROW outside of the COI. The shifting of entirely affected shops will be done in a way that will allow the AHs to gradually phase out their operation in their present location and gradually begin their operation in their new place. Under this arrangement, the shop owners, whose business caters greatly to road users, will not experience total disruption in their operation.

B. Temporary Impacts

118. To ensure that temporary impacts during construction will be avoided, if not minimized, the contract for civil works will include the following provisions: (a) contractor to pay rent for any land required for construction work space outside the ROW; (b) to the extent possible, only idle land will be used as construction work space to avoid disruption to households and business establishments; and (c) temporary use of land will be restored or improved to its pre-Project condition. The PMU3, assisted by the PRSC, will review any written agreement with the AHs, payment records, and disbursement of payment to ensure proper monitoring and compliance with the Project resettlement policy. Said monitoring will be included in the quarterly progress reports of the PMU3 to be submitted to MPWT and the ADB.

X. INCOME RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION

A. General Provisions

119. An income restoration program (IRP) will be planned and developed with the assistance of community development specialists to be hired by IRC for the purpose. While those who are entitled to participate in program include AHs affected by the loss of entire shops, it is not expected that the Project will severely disrupt the business operation of shop owners. Therefore, the focus of the IRP is more on helping the poor and other vulnerable AHs improve their situation. For this purpose, the IRP will be designed during the updating of the RP and will be implemented in parallel with the implementation of the RP with the active involvement of the participating AHs.

120. The IRP will be geared towards helping the participating AHs produce for their basic needs within one years. This will be accomplished by helping them find ways to (a) maximize the use of their remaining lands for food production (rice and vegetables), (b) engage in fast-return and short-cycle backyard livestock production, and (c) find work in urban areas. The IRP strategy puts emphasis on food production, aware of the fact that the AHs are mostly, if not all, farmers and that production in the project area is basically for home consumption. Farm production will be augmented by small-scale, short-cycle livestock production on the remaining lands of the AHs. This activity is intended to provide both food and cash to the AHs. It is also intended to provide livelihood to members of the AHs who are no longer able to seek employment in factories and shops in urban areas, such as the elderly. In addition to the two activities, members of the AHs that are within the working age (15 to 60 years old) will be provided training, as needed, and referred to establishments in need of workers. This component of the strategy is also intended to bring in cash for the other basic needs of the AHs.

60 61

121. For purposes of budgeting, and assuming that there is not double counting9, a total of 536 AHs are entitled to participate in the IRP. A provisional sum is allocated in the resettlement budget to finance the various components of the IRP, notably, training in food production, seed capital for home-based livestock and food production, and training for job placement. The allocated amount for each AH will not be given to the household but will be used as a block fund to support the various components of the program. The specific implementation mechanism for the use of the IRP funds will be spelled out in the planning of the program. Therefore, the block fund that will be put up for the 536 AHs is $160,800.

B. Loss of productive land

1. Land within the Right of Way 122. Occupied land in the ROW will not be compensated. However, AHs affected by the loss of ROW land used for agriculture will be provided cash assistance for permanent loss of land use at $0.50per m2 as explained in the section on Project Resettlement Policy.

Table X.1 Loss of Land Use within Road Right of Way Road Section Quantity (m2) 314D 12,004.0 NR13 44,681.3 Total 55,685.3

2. Privately Owned Land 123. Privately owned land to be acquired in the expansion and development of the CBF at Prey Var (314D) will be compensated at prevailing market rates.

Table X.2 Acquired Private Land at CBF Types of Land Area (m2) Farmland 12,135.12 Grazing land 10,560.0 Total 24,945.72

C. Loss of Business Income

124. Owners of unregistered independent shops and house-and-stores that are entirely affected are each entitled to receive one-time cash assistance (allowance) of $50 for loss of income. None of the owners of entirely affected shops claimed to be registered.10 In all, $2,350 is allocated for 314D for income loss allowance, while $100 is allocated for the CBF, and $2,850 for NR13.

9 Some of the AHs in the vulnerable groups could also be among those losing entire houses and shops.

10If during the DMS, registered entirely affected shops are found, owners of the same will be provided income loss allowance equivalent to the daily net income (as reflected in tax receipts) multiplied by the days of business disruption.

Table X.3 Income Loss Allowance 314D CBF NR13 Income Loss Income Loss Income Loss Main Structures Count Count Count Allowance ($) Allowance ($) Allowance ($) House-and-store 2 100 1 50 0 00 Independent 45 2,250 1 50 57 2,850 shops Total 47 2,350 2 100 57 2,850

XI. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING PLAN

125. Funds for the implementation of the RP are part of the Project budget. Costs have been estimated based on results of the IOL and the RCS as of July 2011.

A. Procedures for flow of funds

126. The IRC will request the MEF for the funds to implement the RP. The funds will be forwarded to the Provincial Department of Finance. Payment vouchers will be prepared at the RD-MEF for submission to and approval by the IRC. Funds for compensation and other entitlements will be forwarded by the Provincial Department of Finance to the PRSC for disbursement. Payment of compensation and other entitlements, except for land-for-land arrangements, will be in cash and will be given in commune offices. The AHs will be notified through the village chiefs of the schedule of payment of compensation and other entitlements.

B. Implementation, administration and contingency costs

127. Implementation costs cover payment of allowances and per diem of concerned personnel involved in the updating and implementation of the RP, including members of the provincial and district resettlement working groups. Administrative costs and contingencies amounting to 15% each have been added on top of the cost of resettlement. MPWT and IRC will ensure that adequate funds are made available as and when necessary for the efficient and timely implementation of resettlement.

C. Estimated Costs of Resettlement

128. The estimated cost of resettlement is US$1,380,966.58, inclusive of the cost for hiring an external monitoring agency. Table XI.1 provides a breakdown of these costs.

Table XI.1 Summary of Resettlement Costs (314D, CBF, NR13) Rate AMOUNT Items Unit Quantity ($/Unit) (US$) LAND 88,442.41 Cultivated ROW land (loss of land use) m² 55,685.3 0.50 27,842.65 Private residential land (CBF) m² 2,250.6 11.80 26,557.08 Private agriculture/grazing land (CBF) m² 57,935.9 1.5 34,042.68

MAIN STRUCTURES 108,918.21 Partially affected houses and independent shops m² 2,162.9 varied 50,018.26 Repair cost of partially affected main structures $ 50,018.26 20% 10,003.65 Entirely affected houses and independent shops m² 3,846.80 varied 48,896.30

SECONDARY STRUCTURES 487,304.41 Extended eaves m² 10,011.90 varied 352,481.47

62 63

Rate AMOUNT Items Unit Quantity ($/Unit) (US$) Fence LM 35,152.80 varied 59,754.95 Shed m² 240.0 varied 3,996.20 Assorted other structures - - varied 71,071.79

TREES (Perennials and timber) No 12,738 varied 122,261.26

Sub-Total 1 806,926.29 ALLOWANCES AND OTHER ENTITLEMENTS Transportation allowance for relocating house and shops@ AH 151 $50 7,550.00 Transportation allowance for 6 relocating house/shop AH 6 $50 300.00 renters One time assistance allowance for relocating house * AH 48 200 9,600.00 One time assistance allowance for relocating independent AH 103 100 10,300.00 shops * Income loss allowance for relocating shop, house/shop AH 106 $50 5,300.00 Rental allowance for relocating renters of house/store AH 6 $33 198.00 One time assistance allowance for vulnerable AHs & AH 90 100 9,000.00 Income restoration program (IRP) block fund 536 $300 160,800.00

Sub-Total 2 203,048.00 External Monitoring/Evaluation Lump sum 68,000.00 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 1,009,974.29 Administrative Cost (15%) 151,496.14 Costs contingencies (15%) 151,496.14 GRAND TOTAL (rounded) 1,380,966.58 * Based on the assumption that all those entitled will relocated outside ROW. The number of AHs relocating in or outside the ROW will be determined during DMS & The precise number of vulnerable AHs will be determined during updating of the resettlement plan @The unit rate for transportation allowance used above is an estimated average. The precise entitlements per household will be determined during updating of the resettlement plan depending on type of impact and where they relocate to.

129. Additional resources will also be provided by the Project to prepare and implement the updated resettlement plan which are costed elsewhere in the overall Project budget. These include:

a. Dedicated officers within the Social and Environment Unit of the PMU including resettlement, gender and social specialists.

b. Specialist consultants in the Project Supervision Assistant team including the following specialists:

(i) Resettlement specialist (international 6 person-months, national 24 person-months); (ii) Social/gender/IP specialist (international 6 person-months, national 24 person-months);

c. Other Provincial Line Agencies and mass organizations to be mobilized in support of implementation of the Resettlement Plan (refer also to the section on Institutional Arrangements). 130. The details of the resettlement budget estimates are presented in Annex 7.

XII. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS

131. The owner of the project is MPWT, the Executing Agency; therefore, it has over-all responsibility for the successful implementation of the RP. MPWT will be assisted by a number of offices within and outside the Ministry, starting with the Project Management Unit 3 (PMU3) that is tasked with undertaking the Project. With assistance from the ESO of MPWT, the PMU3 will work closely with the Resettlement Department of the Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee (RD-IRC) relative to the preparation, updating, and implementation of the RP.

A. Environmental and Social Office

132. The Environmental and Social Office (ESO)11, under the Department of Planning of MPWT is the lead arm of the PMU3 in the preparation and implementation of the RP. The ESO presently has 9 staff, with plans to get 3 additional persons from other units of the Ministry. The staff members of the ESO work for both resettlement and environmental tasks. However, while all of them claim to be familiar with the conduct of socioeconomic survey, only 3 claim to know how to do the inventor of losses. None of the staff has the capacity to write an RP. For this reason, the project supervision consultants should prepare a training program for the staff of ESO in connection with the preparation, implementation, and monitoring of the RP.

133. The ESO will work closely with the IRC and Resettlement Department at the Ministry of Economy and Finance (RD-MEF). Its tasks include the following: a. Secure the approval of the RP by the IRC; b. Secure prior approval by IRC and the ADB for any variations in the approved RP; c. Secure the data base of affected persons and assets that will be gathered during the preparation and updating of the RP; d. Prepare progress reports on RP implementation for submission to the MPWT and PMU3.

B. IRC and the Resettlement Department

134. The IRC is a collegial body composed of representatives from concerned line ministries, such as the Council of Ministers (COM); the MPWT; and the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF), including representatives of the Municipality of Phnom Penh, the Governor and Deputy Governor of provinces traversed by the Project road. Created by the Prime Minister through Decision No. 13, dated 18 March 1997, in connection with the resettlement of APs in the Highway 1 Project (Loan 1659-CAM), it has since been involved in other foreign-assisted government infrastructure projects with involuntary resettlement.

135. The IRC will assume the function of a quasi-regulatory body, ensuring that funds for resettlement are spent properly and that the RP is carried out as intended. The technical arm of the IRC is RD-MEF. The RD-MEF will assist IRC in the following tasks:

11Formerly the Social and Environmental Unit (SEU)

64 65

a. Reviewing and approving the RP, ensuring that the RP is consistent with ADB’s 2009 Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) and, later, the loan agreement; b. Endorsing the approved RP to ADB; c. Establishing or convening the Provincial Resettlement Committee (PRSC) and its Working Group (WG); d. Orienting, as needed, the PRSC and its working group (PRSC-WG) on their tasks relative to RP updating and implementation; e. Securing from the national treasury the budget for carrying out the RP, ensuring that funds are available in a timely manner and in sufficient amounts; f. Approving all disbursements connected with the implementation of the RP, such as payment of compensation and other entitlements, acquisition and preparation of replacement plots, operational expenses of personnel, etc.; g. Ensuring that funds for resettlement are spent judiciously; and h. With assistance from an independent organization, monitoring the implementation of the RP, ensuring that this is carried out in compliance with the Project resettlement policy and with the loan agreement. C. Provincial Resettlement Sub-committee

136. The Provincial Resettlement Sub-Committee (PRSC) is a collegial body at the provincial level. Headed by the Provincial Deputy Governor, the members of the PRSC are provincial department directors of line ministries represented in the IRC, and also the chiefs of the districts and communes traversed by the Project road.

137. The technical arm of the PRSC is the Working Group (PRSC-WG). The PRSC-WG is headed by the Director (or a representative) of the Provincial Department of Public Works and Transport (PDPWT). The regular members of the PRSC-WG come from the Provincial Government, Provincial Department of Economy and Finance (MDEF), and the Ministry of Interior. The PRSC-WG has a counterpart at the district level composed of personnel from various line agencies.

138. In an effort to make the whole process of resettlement effective, participatory and transparent, the chiefs of the affected communes and villages, and a male and female representative each of the APs in affected communes will seat in the district RSC-WG in matters concerning their respective areas of jurisdiction.

139. The PRSC, through the provincial and district working groups, will have the following functions: a. Facilitate a sustained public information campaign, ensuring that the public, especially the AHs, are updated on any developments regarding the Project and resettlement activities; b. Spearhead the DMS and updated census of APs, including the updating of the rates used in calculating compensation and other entitlements to reflect prevailing market rates at the time of compensation; c. Spearhead the selection, acquisition, and preparation of replacement plots, including the preparation of a coordinated schedule of delivery of compensation

and other entitlements, the relocation of people, harvesting of standing crops, and the start of civil works in a particular section of the Project road sections; d. Spearhead the delivery of compensation and other entitlements to the AHs; e. Receive and act on the complaints and grievances of AHs in accordance with the Project resettlement policy; and f. Maintain a record of all public meetings, grievances, and actions taken to address complaints and grievances. D. Project Supervision Consultants

140. The Project Supervision Consultants (PSC), together with the ESO and the PRSC-WG, will spearhead the updating of the RP through the conduct of the DMS in a participatory and transparent way and consistent with the Project resettlement policy. Once approved by the IRC and MPWT and concurred in by ADB, the PSC will provide technical advice in the implementation of the approved RP. The PSC will likewise provide capacity-building orientation and skills training, as needed, to concerned personnel of the PMU3, the ESO, and the Provincial and District Working Groups.

141. Together with the PMU3 and ESO, the PSC will supervise civil works activities to ensure that the contractors adhere with the terms of their contract relative to avoiding and/or minimizing resettlement impacts, in addition to ensuring that contractors provide the necessary compensation and/or assistance to the AHs prior to and/or during construction activities.

142. The PSC will have one international resettlement specialist (6 months, intermittent), a local resettlement specialist (12 months, intermittent), a local livelihood specialist (6 months, intermittent), and a local gender specialist (3 months, intermittent).

XIII. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE

A. RP Updating and Implementation

143. Following completion of detailed engineering design, the RP will be updated. Resettlement implementation (i.e., land clearing and relocation of AHs) can only commence once ADB has reviewed and given its concurrence to it. Consultations with the AHs will be carried out on a continuing basis, paying particular attention to the vulnerable and severely affected households.

1. Setting-up the PRSC-WG 144. The Resettlement Department of the Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee (IRC) will convene the Provincial Resettlement Sub-committee which in turn will work for the establishment of its Working Group (PRSC-WG). Headed by the Deputy Provincial Governor with the participation of the Director (or a representative) of the Provincial Department of Public Works and Transport (PDPWT), the regular members (i.e., not changing within the province) of the PRSC-WG come from the Provincial Government, Provincial Department of Economy and Finance (MDEF), and the Provincial Department of the Interior. Moreover, a male and female representative each of the AHs in a commune traversed by the project will be represented in the PRSC-WG. The PRSC-WG will coordinate closely with the Project supervision consultant (PSC), the civil works contractor, the local government, and the AHs to ensure the smooth and orchestrated updating and implementation of the RP.

66 67

2. Detailed measurement survey and updated census of APs 145. Following final design and staking of the corridor of impact (COI), a detailed measurement survey (DMS) and updated census of AHs will be carried out by the PRSC-WG with assistance from the Project supervision consultants (PSC). The procedures of the DMS are similar to those of the IOL, i.e., detailed recording of all users of land and owners of other assets. The PSC will train members of the resettlement sub-committee working group (RSWG) on the categorization scheme used in the RP as employed in the replacement cost study (RCS).

146. A new socio-economic survey will be carried out if RP updating does not commence within two years as demographic and socio-economic factors may change significantly within that period. It will cover at least 20% of severely affected AHs and at least 10% of other AHs losing main structures and productive assets.

B. Indicative implementation schedule of the RP

147. The table below summarizes the various inter-related activities connected with the updating and implementation of the RP.

Table XIII.1 Indicative Schedule of Resettlement Activities Activities Schedule RP preparation June – November2011 ADB concurrence of draft RP November2011 RP updating April 2012 Submission to and ADB concurrence of updated RP June 2012 Implementation of the approved updated RP July – December 2012 Internal monitoring (submission of quarterly reports) April 2012 – December 2012 External Monitoring (submission of bi-annual M&E reports) April 2012 – December 2013

XIV. MONITORING AND REPORTING

148. The ESO of MPWT and the IRC, through the Resettlement Department at the Ministry of Economy and Finance (RD-MEF), will conduct regular monitoring and evaluation of the updating and implementation of the RP. Said monitoring and evaluation is intended to help ensure that the RP is prepared according to the resettlement policy and that it is implemented as planned. The ESO is Government’s in-house monitoring body, while the RD-MEF, which will hire an independent organization, will be the Project’s external monitor.

A. Indicators for Internal monitoring

149. The following indicators will be monitored periodically by ESO:

a. Compensation and entitlements are computed at rates and procedures as provided in the approved RP; b. AHs are paid as per agreement with Project authorities; c. Public information, public consultation and grievance redress procedures are followed as described in the approved RP; d. Public facilities and infrastructure affected by the Project are restored promptly; and, e. The transition between resettlement and civil works is smooth.

B. External monitoring agency

150. The IRC will hire an independent organization to carry out external monitoring and post-implementation evaluation. The IRC will prepare the terms of reference (TOR) for this purpose. The TOR of the external monitoring organization (EMO) and the selection of the monitor will require the prior consent of ADB. The EMO will provide RD-MEF and ADB a copy of its semi-annual monitoring reports. The EMO will likewise conduct a Post-RP Implementation Evaluation Study one (1) year following the completion of resettlement.

68 Appendix 1

INVENTORY OF LOSSES INSTRUCTION: To be accomplished for all persons/households with affected assets (i.e., structures, crops, trees, and land located within 10 meters from the centerline of the roadway or carriageway).

I. Identification of the Displaced Person (DP) / Affected Household (AH) Name of Occupant/User/Owner of Affected Asset(s): Gender: [ ] Male [ ] Female Age: ____ Physical condition: [ ] Normal [ ] Disabled Average Monthly Household Income ($): ______Marital status:[ ] Married; [ ] Single; [ ] Divorced; [ ] Widow/er Name of spouse: Ethnic affiliation: [ ] Khmer [ ] Cham [ ] Thai [ ] Other, specify:______Location of affected asset/s: Code of DP/AH: Village: Commune:

II. Affected Assets A.1 Land: Area and Tenure Status Over the Affected Land (indicate area of affected portion of the land [m²] in appropriate box below) Total Area of Classification/ Certificate Occupying Occupying Occupied/ Use of Land* Title/ Rent or under WITH WITHOUT Owned Land (m²) Certificate Lease application Permission Permission 1. 2. *Examples of land classification or use: residential, commercial, farmland, forestland

A.2 If renting or occupying the affected land with permission from owner: With Lease Agreement (Renting) With permission (not Amount of rental Address/Location of Land Owner paying rent)Check the Name of Land Owner fee (Indicate in US$) box below 1. 2.

B.1 Structures* found on the affected land: State whether Area (m²) Area (m²) Total area (m²) / impact on Type/Use of Affected Structure /Length (LM) of /Length (LM) of Length (LM) of structure is Structure Classification** Structure Structure to be Structure PARTIAL or Affected Acquired TOTAL 1. 2. 3. *Examples of structures:house, storage, store/shop, house-and-store, fence, tomb, well, kitchen, toilet, waiting shed, concrete pavement, box culvert (driveway) access to residence, irrigation canal, etc. ** Specifics of classification: Use classification system of the local government.

B.2 Tenure status over the affected house/store/building: Tenure* Structure Tenant/ Owner Occupying WITH Occupying WITHOUT Renter Permission Permission 1. 2. *Check the appropriate box.

B.3 If affected house/store/building does not belong to the DP/AH: Paying Rent? Check If Paying Rent, How Name of Owner of Affected Address/Location of Building appropriate box below much is Monthly Rent? House/Store/ Building Owner No Yes (Indicate in US$) 1. 2.

Appendix 1

C. Annual crops found on the affected land: Name/Type of Annual Crops* Actual Area Planted to the Crop (m²) During IOL 1. 2. *Examples of annual crops:rice, corn, sugarcane, cassava, etc.

D. Type and number (count) of perennials found on the affected land: Not Yet Fruit-bearing Fruit-bearing Categories* Name of Perennial About to Young A B C D bear fruit 1. 2. 3. 4. Total *Specifics of categories:Use categories of the local government.

E. Type and count of timber trees found on the affected land: Timber Tree Categories* Name of Perennial A B C D 1. 2. 3. 4. Total *Specifics of categories:Use categories of the local government.

F. Loss of business, job, and income: Duration of Disruption in Business Operation (Check Paid Workers (if any) Nature of Net Monthly appropriate box) Business* Income ($) Average Monthly Permanent Temporary Number Salary of Workers ($) 1. 2. *Examples of business:motor vehicle repair shop, grocery store, restaurant

III. Other Relevant Information on the DP/AH: A. Information on other landholdings of the DP/AH not affected by the project: Specifics Residential Commercial Land for Garden and Pond Annual Crop Land for Perennial Tenure status* Total area (m²) *Specifics of tenure status: with title/certificate, certificate/title under process, with lease agreement, occupying with permission, occupying without permission

B. Relocation options for AHs losing entire (totally) house or building: (Check the appropriate box) Construct on remaining land in Relocate to other landholdings Landless (Relocate to Relocation options the ROW of the AH government relocation site)

______Name and Signature of AH or Representative Relationship with the AH

______Name and Signature of Enumerator Date accomplished:______

70 Appendix 1

IV. Sketch of affected land and relative location of other assets found thereat:

10 m COI

Start of Road Centerline

10 m COI

Appendix 2

REPLACEMENT COST STUDY

1. Introduction

1. This report is to present the survey results of the Study of Replacement Cost for provincial roads improvement project, Southeast NR314D, NR 13 and Midwest NR150B, NR53 and NR151B, funded by ADB TA 7665-CAM.

2. Data collection for this study was conducted from 21 May 2011 to 01 July 2011 for Southeast section and from 06 July to 13 July 2011 for section Midwest.

2. Objective of the Study

3. The study is to establish compensation rates for structures, trees, and other non-land based income (e.g., businesses, fishponds, etc.). The aim is to ensure full restoration value of the affected/expropriated assets by the Project.

3. Survey Methodology

4. In order to achieve the above research objectives, the study required detailed preparations. First, it was necessary be become familiar with legal framework and associated resettlement and compensation issues in Cambodia. This was done during the first days of research planning.

5. Next, all available literature related to replacement cost study, and more particularly, resettlement and replacement cost study of road improvement projects.

6. The information gathering at the field for the calculation of replacement cost in the project area are as follows:

Canvass of construction material in districts traversed by the project road sections; Interview contractors and builders in the local area to determine the current cost of labor in the construction sector; Meet with government officials from the agriculture department, and land management department; Hold focus group discussion with land owners and villagers together with commune and village officials; and Interview local (commune and village) officials and residents, to find out the current market rate of fixed assets, especially land, in the project area as per record of recent sale transactions; Interview with resident and agriculture product sellers to find out current market of fruit tree affected by the project.

7. Field data survey including measurement of affected stall and houses along the project road. Categories of houses are classified based on the roofing material and its sub-categories also were classified for those houses with similar material and price in average.

72 Appendix 2

4. Cambodia Legal Framework and Eligible Entitlements

4.1 Land Use within the right of way (ROW) in Cambodia

8. Throughout Cambodia it is very common to see people lives on and uses the land within the right of way (ROW) of a highway or road. Since we have full peace in Cambodia, 1993, the government never publicly claimed the land located within the later announced ROW, average Cambodians moved into the ROW zone, cultivating, operating business, building stores and houses.

4.2 Cambodia Legal Framework

9. The 1993 Constitution of Cambodia states that the “right to confiscate properties from any person shall be exercised only in the public interest as provided by law and shall require fair and just compensation in advance” (Article 44).

10. The Land Law of 2001 (NS/RKM/0801/14, 20 July 2001) governs land and property rights in Cambodia. Based on the provisions of the 1993 Constitution, it determines the regime of ownership of immovable properties that are defined as including land, trees and immovable structures.

11. The rights and responsibilities of the Royal Government of Cambodia (RGC) with respect to eminent domain are specified in the Land Law. The RGC can acquire private land (i) for public purposes under condition of (ii) fair and just compensation, (iii) paid in advance. The Land Law, Article 5, states:

“No person may be deprived of his ownership, unless it is in the public interest. An ownership deprivation shall be carried out in accordance with the forms and procedures provided by law and regulations and after the payment of fair and just compensation in advance.”

12. There are other provisions of the Land Law that are relevant to land acquisition, compensation and resettlement. The key provisions are indicated below:

(i) Legal possession as defined by the Law is the sole basis for ownership, and all transfers or changes of rights of ownership shall be carried out in accordance with the required general rules for sale, succession, exchange and gift or by court decision. (Article 6) (ii) Any regime of ownership of immovable property prior to 1979 shall not be recognized. (Article 7) (iii) State public land includes, among other categories, any property that is made available for public use such as roads. (Article 15) (iv) Persons that illegally occupy, possess or claim title to state public land cannot claim any compensation. This includes land established by the RGC as public rights-of-way (ROW) for roads and railways. Moreover, failure to vacate illegally occupied land in a timely manner is subject to expel. (Article 19)

73 Appendix 2

(v) Persons with legally valid possession of land for five years (at the time the law came into effect) are allowed to register as the owner of the land (Article 30). Persons who (at the time the law came into effect) held legal possession but had not yet completed the five years were allowed to remain in possession until they were eligible to be registered as the owner. (Article 31) (vi) However, temporary possession claims made by persons after the law comes into effect will not be recognized, rescinding a previous right under the 1992 Land Law for acquiring land by taking possession. (Articles 29, 34) (vii) Landless people may apply for land for residential and subsistence farming purposes at no cost, as part of a social land concessions scheme. The concessionaire may obtain ownership of this land after fulfilling conditions set out in a separate Sub-Decree on Social Land Concessions. (Articles 50, 51)

13. The RGC Prakas No. 6, “Measures to Crack Down on Anarchic Land Grabbing and Encroachment” (No. 06 BRK, 27 September 1999) prohibits private ownership of State lands, including land adjacent to roads and railways. The Prakas establishes rights-of-way (ROW) for 2-digit national roads such as NR33 of 25 metres from the centerline. Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF) Decree No. 961 (2000) declares that, in order to implement Prakas No. 6, the RGC will not pay compensation to people who occupy the ROW, for any structures or assets located on the land.

Table 4.1: Dimensions of Road ROW Road Category ROW Dimensions National Road 1, 4, 5 30 m from the centerline Other 1-digit National Roads 25 m from the centerline 2-digit National Roads 25 m from the centerline Provincial roads 20 m from the centerline Commune roads 15 m from the centerline

5 ADB Policy

14. The objectives of the ADB Policy on Involuntary Resettlement (1995) and as refined in the New Safeguard Policy Statement (June 2009) are (i) to avoid impacts on people and the environment, where possible; (ii) where avoidance is not possible, minimize, mitigate, or compensate for adverse project impacts on the environment and the affected people; and (iii) help the executing agency strengthen its safeguard system. Towards this end, ADB resettlement policy includes the following principles:

m. Screen the project early on to identify past, present, and future involuntary resettlement impacts and risks. Determine the scope of resettlement planning through a survey and/or census of affected persons, including a gender analysis, specifically related to resettlement impacts and risks.

n. Improve, or at least restore, the livelihoods of all affected persons through (i) land-based resettlement strategies when affected livelihoods are land based

74 Appendix 2

where possible or cash compensation at replacement value for land when the loss of land does not undermine livelihoods, (ii) prompt replacement of assets with access to assets of equal or higher value, (iii) prompt compensation at full replacement cost for assets that cannot be restored, and (iv) additional revenues and services through benefit sharing schemes where possible. o. Provide physically and economically displaced persons with needed assistance, including the following: (i) if there is relocation, secured tenure to relocation land, better housing at resettlement sites with comparable access to employment and production opportunities, integration of resettled persons economically and socially into their host communities, and extension of project benefits to host communities; (ii) transitional support and development assistance, such as land development, credit facilities, training, or employment opportunities; and (iii) civic infrastructure and community services, as required. p. Improve the standards of living of the affected poor and other vulnerable groups, including women, to at least national minimum standards. In rural areas provide them with legal and affordable access to land and resources, and in urban areas provide them with appropriate income sources and legal and affordable access to adequate housing. q. Develop procedures in a transparent, consistent, and equitable manner if land acquisition is through negotiated settlement. r. Ensure that affected persons without titles to land or any recognizable legal rights to land are eligible for resettlement assistance and compensation for loss of non-land assets. s. Prepare a resettlement plan elaborating on affected persons’ entitlements, the income and livelihood restoration strategy, institutional arrangements, monitoring and reporting framework, budget, and time-bound implementation schedule. t. Prepare a resettlement plan elaborating on affected persons’ entitlements, the income and livelihood restoration strategy, institutional arrangements, monitoring and reporting framework, budget, and time-bound implementation schedule. u. Disclose a draft resettlement plan, including documentation of the consultation process in a timely manner, before project appraisal, in an acceptable place and a form and language(s) understandable to affected persons and other stakeholders. Disclose the final resettlement plan and its updates to affected persons and other stakeholders. v. Conceive and execute involuntary resettlement as part of a development project or program. Include the full costs of resettlement in the presentation of project’s cost and benefits. For a project with significant involuntary resettlement impacts, consider implementing the involuntary resettlement component of the project as a stand-alone operation. w. Pay compensation and provide other resettlement entitlements before physical or economic displacement. Implement the resettlement plan under close supervision throughout project implementation.

75 Appendix 2

x. Monitor and assess resettlement outcomes, their impacts on the standards of living of affected persons, and whether the objectives of the resettlement plan have been achieved by taking into account the baseline conditions and the results of resettlement monitoring. Disclose monitoring reports.

15. The objective of ADB Policy on Indigenous Peoples (1998) and as refined in the New Safeguard Policy Statement (June 2009) is to design and implement projects in a way that fosters full respect for Indigenous Peoples’ identity, dignity, human rights, livelihood systems, and cultural uniqueness as defined by the Indigenous Peoples themselves so that they (i) receive culturally appropriate social and economic benefits, (ii) do not suffer adverse impacts as a result of projects, and (iii) can participate actively in projects that affect them.

16. The ADB Policy on Gender and Development (ADB, 2006; ADB, 1998) adopts gender mainstreaming as a key strategy for promoting gender equity, and for ensuring that women participate in and that their needs are explicitly addressed in the decision-making process for development activities. For projects that have the potential to have substantial gender impacts, a gender plan is prepared to identify strategies to address gender concerns and the involvement of women in the design, implementation and monitoring of the project.

17. However, since this project has minor negative impact on vendors at the above project area and the demolishment was done before the project study, the report of losses assessment has been required for the project based on the ADB safeguard policy rather than a resettlement plan.

6. Cost Calculation of Structure

6.1 Material Used for Shop Construction, Stall, House and Fence

18. To assess the loss of structures of both in this study, consultant will use the market rate from construction shop seller in the area as basis to estimate the impact. Hence compensation to affected people will reflect market rate.

19. In order to produce the table of materials for structures, the consultant interview construction shops along the project road that supply to people living in the area. An average of construction material was produced provided the assumption that people may buy construction material from different sources.

20. This study will produce two separate replacement cost tables for different geographic area and distance of transportation of construction materials. First table will be for Southeast section and second table is for Midwest section.

Table 6.1: Price of Construction Material along the Project Road- SOUTHEAST

Average for RCS Item Description Qty Unit 2011 from Survey A CEMENT 1 Elephant cement (Big) 1 ton 2 Elephant cement (Small) 1 ton 3 Diamond cement 1 ton 99.76 4 Camel cement 1 ton 5 Mountain cement 1 ton

76 Appendix 2

Average for RCS Item Description Qty Unit 2011 from Survey B STEEL 1 Vietnam brand name Ø6,8 1 kg 0.93 2 Vietnam brand name Ø10 1 d 5.38 3 Vietnam Ø12, 14, 16 or 18mm 1 d 8.25 4 Steel Net 1 kg 1.29 C PLYWOOD FOR HOUSE PARTITION 1 1 Paper plywood 1 piece 4.21 2 3mm plywood 1 piece 5.78 3 5mm plywood 1 piece 6.00 D FLOORING 1 Chinese floor tile with low quality 1 m2 4.12 2 Chinese tile for wall 1 m2 4.19 3 Chinese floor tile for bathroom 1 m2 4.17 4 Concrete block 1 m2 4.00 E DOOR AND WINDOW 1 Wooden door 800x1800 1 set 40.00 2 Wooden door 1000x2000 1 set 60.00 3 Wooden door 800x1900 1 set 45.00 4 Wooden door 800x2000 1 set 60.00 5 Wooden door 1000x1800 1 set 48.75 6 Wooden door 1200x2000 1 set 50.00 7 Plastic door 1 set 14.58 8 Wood window, Duong Chem: 600x800 1 set 11.13 9 Wood window, Duong Chem: 700x900 1 set 12.75 10 Wood window, Duong Chem: 800x1000 1 set 14.50 F ROOF COVER 1 Thai Tile (CPAC) 1 piece 0.51 2 Khmer Tile 1 piece 0.18 3 Thatch/palm leaves 1 piece 0.09 4 Steel sheet (2meters long) 1 sheet 2.44 5 Steel sheet (2.4meters long) 1 sheet 2.94 6 Steel sheet (3meters long) 1 sheet 3.40 7 Steel sheet (3.6meters long) 1 sheet 4.04 8 Fiber cement 1 sheet 2.50 G OTHERS 1 Terracotta (Kansaeng) 1 piece 0.25 2 Brick 1 piece 0.05 3 Gravel 1x2 Black 1 m3 27.75 4 Gravel 1x2 White 1 m3 23.75 5 Gravel 4x6 1 m3 14.00 6 Sand 1 m3 9.17 7 Concrete pipe for well d.800 1 pipe 6.25 8 Concrete pipe for well d.1000 1 pipe 10.00 9 Concrete pipe for drainage d.300 1 pipe 5.50 10 Concrete pipe for drainage d.400 1 pipe 8.25 11 Concrete pipe for drainage d.500 1 pipe 11.25 12 Concrete pipe for drainage d.600 1 pipe 15.00 13 Concrete pipe for drainage d.800 1 pipe 30.00 14 Soil filling 1 m3 1.63 15 Concrete fence column L=1700 1 post 2.25 H WOOD AND BAMBOO 1 Wood for column and roofing structure 1 m 440.00

77 Appendix 2

Average for RCS Item Description Qty Unit 2011 from Survey 2 Wood for other structure 2x20 1 m 2.40 3 Wood for other structure 4x4 1 m 0.83 4 Wood for other structure 4x12 1 m 2.38 5 Wood for other structure 12x12 1 m 8.75 6 Small pole 1 pole 1.00 7 Bamboo L=3000mm 20 pieces 2.50 8 Bamboo L=4000mm 20 pieces 3.00 I PAINTING 1 U 90 interior 1 cont. 21.50 2 U 90 exterior 1 cont. 25.13 3 Campaint 1 cont. 32.50 J PLASTIC PIPE 1 Dia. No 21 1 pipe 1.00 2 Dia. No 40 1 pipe 1.88 3 Dia. No 42 1 pipe 2.00 4 Dia. No 100 1 pipe 8.75 K CONGRET COLUM FOR HOUSE 1 Cheurng Tang L=300 1 column 1.25 2 Cheurng Tang L=400 1 column 1.50 3 Cheurng Tang L=500 1 column 2.00 4 Cheurng Tang L=600 1 column 2.00 5 Cheurng Tang L=800 1 column 2.25 6 Cheurng Tang L=1000 1 column 4.63 7 Concrete support column L=1500 1 column 5.50 8 Concrete support column L=2000 1 column 6.50

Table 6.2: Price of Construction Material along the Project Road (Midwest) Average for RCS Item Description Qty Unit 2011 from Survey A CEMENT 1 Elephant cement (Big) 1 ton 2 Elephant cement (Small) 1 ton 3 Diamond cement 1 ton 95.58 4 Camel cement 1 ton 5 Mountain cement 1 ton 6 Dragon Cement 1 ton B STEEL 1 Vietnam brand name Ø6,8 1 kg 0.89 2 Vietnam brand name Ø10 1 d 5.69 3 Vietnam Ø12, 14, 16 or 18mm 1 d 8.13 4 Steel Net 1 kg 1.30 C PLYWOOD FOR HOUSE PARTITION 1 1 Paper plywood 1 piece 5.75 2 3mm plywood 1 piece 6.63 3 5mm plywood 1 piece 8.13 D FLOORING 1 Chinese floor tile with low quality 1 m2 3.75 2 Chinese tile for wall 200x300 1 m2 3.63 3 Chinese tile for wall 250x400 1 m2 4.50 4 Chinese floor tile for bathroom 1 m2 4.88

78 Appendix 2

Average for RCS Item Description Qty Unit 2011 from Survey E DOOR AND WINDOW 1 Wooden door 800x1800 1 set 40.00 2 Wooden door 1000x2000 1 set 60.00 3 Wooden door 800x2000 1 set 101.25 4 Wooden door 1000x1800 1 set 120.00 5 Wooden door 1200x2000 1 set 140.00 6 Plastic door 1 set 20.00 7 Wood window, Duong Chem: 800x1100 1 set 35.00 F ROOF COVER 1 Thai Tile (CPAC) 1 pice 0.50 2 Khmer Tile 1 pice 0.54 3 Thatch/palm leaves 1 piece 0.05 4 Steel sheet (2 m long) 1 sheet 2.38 5 Steel sheet (2.4 m long) 1 sheet 2.75 6 Steel sheet (3 m long) 1 sheet 3.38 7 Steel sheet (3.6 m long) 1 sheet 4.00 8 Fiber cement 1 sheet 2.43 9 Concrete block 5.00 G OTHERS 1 Terracota (Kansaeng) 1 m2 3.00 2 Brick 1 piece 0.05 3 Gravel 1x2 Black 1 m3 21.50 4 Gravel 4x6 1 m3 14.58 5 Sand 1 m3 5.50 6 Concrete pipe for well d.800 1 pipe 6.50 7 Concrete pipe for well d.1000 1 pipe 8.25 8 Concrete pipe for drainage d.300 1 pipe 4.38 9 Concrete pipe for drainage d.400 1 pipe 7.50 10 Concrete pipe for drainage d.500 1 pipe 12.00 11 Concrete pipe for drainage d.600 1 pipe 16.00 12 Concrete pipe for drainage d.800 1 pipe 32.00 13 Soil filling 1 m3 1.50 14 Concrete fence column L=1700 1 post 2.50 H WOOD AND BAMBOO 1 Wood for column and roofing structure 1 m3 300.00 2 Pole dia. 50-60 1 pole 0.88 3 Small pole dia. Smaller than 50mm 1 pole 0.45 4 Bamboo L=5000 mm (1 m bamboo = 3000 R) 20 pieces 3.75 5 Bamboo L=3000mm 20 pieces 2.25 I PAINTING 1 U 90 interior 1 Bucket 20.00 2 U 90 exterior 1 Bucket 25.00 3 Campanit interior 1 Bucket 18.75 4 Campanit exterior 1 Bucket 25.00 J PLASTIC PIPE 1 Dia. No 21 1 pipe 1.10 2 Dia. No 40 1 pipe 2.00 3 Dia No 42 1 pipe 2.20 4 Dia. No 100 1 pipe 9.00 K CONGRET COLUM FOR HOUSE 1 Concrete support column L=300 1 column 1.50

79 Appendix 2

Average for RCS Item Description Qty Unit 2011 from Survey 2 Concrete support column L=400 1 column 1.70 3 Concrete support column L=500 1 column 2.00 4 Concrete support column L=600 1 column 2.50 5 Concrete support column L=800 1 column 3.00 6 Concrete support column L=1000 1 column 4.00 7 Concrete support column L=1500 1 column 5.00 8 Concrete support column L=2000 1 column 6.50

6.2 Replacement Cost For Southeast Section (NR314D, NR13)

6.2.1 Cost Calculation of Existing Structure: Stall, Shop and House

21. The affected structures in the project area can be physically identified and classified into stall, shop, fence, house and other structures.

22. Below is the summary list of cost calculation for stall and shop with above market survey rate. The shops, stall and house of type 1 cannot compensate for setback labor since the moving of structure may damage to material and some of them cannot re-use. It is suggested that these type 1 structures shall be compensated at full market price.

Table 6.3: Compensation Rates for Stall, Shop and House.

Unit Type Wall Column Floor No. of Floor Cost ($/m2) STALL, SHOP AND HOUSE 1A No wall Small pole for Use soil as floor Single 3.90 supporting roof structure 1B No wall Small pole or used Used wood or Single: 0.3m-0.6m 5.84 wood bamboo with small higher than natural wood or bamboo soil structure, higher from soil about 0.3m-0.6m 1C Thatch/ Leaves/ Pole or used wood Use soil as floor or Single 7.32 plastic, or mixed with moveable temporary materials bamboo bed or wooden bed

1D Used metal with Pole or used wood Used wood or Single: 0.3m-1.2m 9.29 1. Thatch/Leave1. Roof used wood or bamboo with small higher than natural mixed temporary wood or bamboo soil materials structure, higher from soil about 0.3m-1.2m 1E Earth wall Pole or used wood Use soil as floor Single 6.28

80 Appendix 2

Unit Type Wall Column Floor No. of Floor Cost ($/m2) 1F Thatch/ Leaves/ Pole or used wood Lean Concrete Single 13.78 plastic, or mixed temporary materials

2A No wall Pole or used wood Use soil as floor Single 7.20 2B No wall Pole or used wood or Concrete Single 13.23 low quality wood 2C Earth wall with Pole or used wood or Use soil as floor Single 9.40 some temporary low quality wood wall material such as metal sheet, wood, thatch,

plastic. 2D Earth wall with Pole or used wood or Used wood or Single: 0.3m-1.2m 10.11 some temporary low quality wood bamboo with small higher than natural wall material such wood or bamboo soil as metal sheet, structure, higher wood, thatch, from soil about plastic. 0.3m-1.2m 2E Wood wall with Pole or used wood or Used wood or Single: 0.3m-1.2m 18.48 temporary material low quality wood bamboo with small higher than natural less than 10% wood or bamboo soil structure, higher from soil about 2. Metal / Fiber CementMetal 2. Roof 0.3m-1.2m 2F Metal wall Pole or used wood or Use soil as floor Single 10.04 low quality wood 2G Thatch wall Pole or used wood or Used wood or Single: 0.3m-1.2m 10.08 low quality wood bamboo with small higher than natural wood or bamboo soil structure, higher from soil about 0.3m-1.2m 2H Thatch wall Pole or used wood or Used wood or Single: 1.2m-2.5m 10.90 low quality wood bamboo with small higher than natural wood or bamboo soil structure, higher from soil about 1.2m-2.5m 2I Wood wall at first Wood column with Wood floor (house Single: 1.2m-2.5m 42.45 floor and only concrete support on still), ground higher than natural column at ground 0.60m floor can be used soil floor for other purpose, not higher than 2.5m 2J Brick wall with Concrete column Concrete floor Single 33.66 plastering 20cm x 20cm

81 Appendix 2

Unit Type Wall Column Floor No. of Floor Cost ($/m2) 2K Brick wall for Hardwood columns Tile at ground floor Two stories: Ground 66.64 ground floor and and wooden floor floor with tile and first wood wall for first with wood structure floor with wood plank floor at first floor

3A Wooden wall with Wood column Concrete floor Single 52.76 wooden structure

3B Wood wall at first Wood column with Wood floor (house Single: 1.2m-2.5m 59.89

floor and only concrete support on still), ground higher than natural column at ground 2.5m floor can be used soil floor for other purpose, not higher than 2.5m 3. Tile Roof Tile 3. 3C Wood wall at first Wood column with Tile at ground floor Two stories: Ground 71.18 floor and only concrete support and wooden floor floor with tile and first column at ground 2.5m with wood structure floor with wood plank floor at first floor

4A Brick wall Concrete column Ground floor and One story plus half 102.45 with foundation mezzanine (half floor with concrete floor) slab (compensation rate for this type is based on every affected floor area) 4B Brick wall Concrete column Ground floor, Multiple stories 141.59

4. Concrete4. with foundation mezzanine, first house (compensation floor and possibility rate for this type is of additional floor based on every house affected floor area)

6.2.2 Cost Calculation of Fence and Gate

23. In order to establish market price of fence and gate, construction material from above table and local contractor were interviewed and use as basis for the calculation.

24. Below costing the summary table of fence and gate.

Type Description Unit Unit Cost Remark US Dollar A FENCE

F1 Loose Fence (palm leave, bamboo, small 1 LM 0.95 Some of the materials used not wooden bar or mix of available local available in the market. In this material) case labor cost will be estimated for the calculation F2 Wooden post with bamboo rebar or wire 1 LM 1.43 F3 Concrete column with its foundation, ground 1 LM 14.36 In case there is no foundation, it is beam of 20cmx20cm; 2meters interval; no suggested to compensate per

82 Appendix 2

Type Description Unit Unit Cost Remark US Dollar wire post as indicated in price list of construction material from the shop plus labor cost and transportation to site (20% to material cost) F4 Concrete post 1.5meter interval, 1.5 meter 1 LM 4.04 high with 8 horizontal wire F5 Concrete post 2meter interval, 2 meters high 1 LM 7.99 with wire or wire mesh; brick wall at lower part 0.3m-0.6m high F6 Concrete Post with plastering brick wall; 1 LM 31.31 Ventilation brick in some as part of 1.6m-2.0m high; 3.5m-4.0m interval brick wall also classified in same type F7 Concrete column with plastering brick wall of 1 LM 58.95 20cm; 1.8m-2.2m high; 3.5m-4.0m interval; decorative concrete baluster and decoration capital F8 Concrete column with plastering brick wall of 1 LM 62.31 20cm; 1.8m-2.0m high; 3.5m-4.0m interval; decoration capital and steel rebar decoration with painting B GATE

1 Main entrance gate with 0.4m-0.6m column LS 122.15 of 2.0m-2.5m high; Steel door 2 Pagoda balustrade at the entrance gate 1 LM 44.24 Normally the entrance balustrade is at road entrance and some pagoda this balustrade locates in the ROW 3 School entrance or other public property LS 189.83 Public property entrance

6.2.3 Cost Calculation of Other Structure

25. The methodology to calculate the cost of other structure and non structure also based on the interview with local people for their knowledge, labor cost together with price list from construction material shops.

Item Description Unit Unit Rate Remark US Dollar OTHER STRUCTURE 1 Dug well (with concrete ring 800mm) 1 75.00 and 6-12 meters depth 2 Pumped well 1 120.00 3 Earth grave 1 150.00 4 Concrete grave (Pray place) 1 500.00 5 Concrete in front of house 1m2 5.99 6 Concrete block 1m2 5.59 7 Terracotta 1m2 7.78 8 Main hold 1m x 1m LS 35.97 9 Brick drainage 1LM 31.96 1 meter depth, 1 meter wide

83 Appendix 2

Item Description Unit Unit Rate Remark US Dollar with concrete cover 10 Drainage pipe, dia. 40cm 1LM 12.09 11 Drainage pipe, dia. 60cm 1LM 19.97 12 Dug pond 1m2 6.00 2.0m-2.5m depth 13 Front roof extension (metal roof) 1m2 14.00 14 Walk passage into people’s property 1m2 3.69 For structure that not able to move as it may damage more than 50%. Full compensation is encouraged. LABOR COST TO SET-BACK STRUCTURE 1 Labor to remove wooden passage LS 5.00 crossing small canal into house 2 Labor to set-back stall from COI LS 15.00 3 Labor to set-back house from COI LS 75.00 For distance not more than 15 meters from existing location

6.2.4 Land Value Estimation

26. Since the world economic downturn in late 2008, land price market in Cambodia is stable and has little sign of going up. From interview with local people, village chief and other property owner, the real estate sector in Cambodia is being recovered back especially in the area where development activities are planned i.e border between Cambodia-Vietnam (NR314D). Up to now there is no transaction in the study area, according to commune chief in Svay Rieng.

27. According to the data collection the price of land can be summarized as below table. Definition of land category are as following:

a. Commercial Land: Land near National Road Number 1 (near junction of NR1 and NR314D) and land near border with Vietnam. b. Resident-cum-commercial land: refer to land or house serves as living and also doing business i.e near market or build-up area in rural, mostly at district level. c. Residential land: land along the study road where village is located or vacant land within the village area. d. Agriculture land: land for doing agriculture purpose along road project. e. Forest land: land that is far from village and is chiefly covered with small trees and undergrowth.

No. Category of Land Average Price / m2 Remark ($) A National Road 314D (NR314D) 1 Commercial 112.27 Near border with Vietnam and Junction with NR1 only (where new market construction is on-going) 2 Resident-cum-commercial 22.00 3 Resident 11.80 4 Agriculture 1.50 B National Road 13 (NR13) 1 Commercial 45.20 Junction with NR1 and NR8 2 Resident-cum-commercial 20.00

84 Appendix 2

No. Category of Land Average Price / m2 Remark ($) 3 Resident 11.70 4 Agriculture 1.40 5 Forest land 0.60

6.2.5 Crops and Trees

28. Crop and tree were calculated based on harvesting yield and maturity time of different tree species interviewed with local people in the area. According to compensation experience of IRC in previous project tree below 3 years get 1/3 of full mature cost, 3 to 5 year compensate 2/3 of full mature cost and 5 years over compensate with full yield cost.

No. Type Unit Unit Cost Remark US Dollar TREE 1 Mango Tree 55.84 2 Coconut Tree 46.41 3 Tamarin Tree 39.17 4 Lemon/Lime Tree 29.00 5 Jackfruit Tree 49.71 6 Custard apple Tree 9.29 7 Sugar Palm tree Tree 51.50 8 Bamboo Tree 0.96 9 Persimon tree Tree 16.89 10 Acacia/ Eucalyptus Tree 6.50 11 Cashew Tree 18.84 12 Pring tree Tree 25.00 13 Kantuort Tree 6.31 14 Jujube Tree 6.00 15 Kro khob Tree 2.50 16 Ampil Teuk Tree 12.33 17 Sdao Tree 12.75 18 Chom-phu Tree 5.33 19 Oy Moy Tree 6.88 20 Sandoricum tree Tree 17.00 21 Kor Tree 6.21 22 Krasang Tree 26.25 23 Makak Tree 12.88 24 Chrey Krem Tree 5.00 25 Tkov Tree 10.00 26 Trakob Barang Tree 11.50 27 Ka ngork Tree 7.50 28 Deum Chhat Tree 4.00 29 Kvet Tree 13.46 30 Orange Tree 26.00 31 Areca nut tree Tree 17.50 32 Ampil Teuk Tree 18.00 33 Pine tree Tree 12.00

85 Appendix 2

No. Type Unit Unit Cost Remark US Dollar 34 Angkear Dei Tree 8.00 35 Rubber tree Tree 15.00 36 Smach Tree 6.00 37 Guava Tree 7.18 38 Ang Kanh Tree 5.00 39 Champei Tree 10.00 40 Others Tree 4.00 to 15.00 CROP 1 Papaya Tree 5.33 2 Banana Tree 2.60 3 Cassava Tree 0.50

6.3 Replacement Cost For Midwest Section (NR150B, NR53, NR151B)

6.3.1 Cost Calculation of Existing Structure: Stall, Shop and House

29. The Midwest section of this study combines three road sections, NR150B, NR53 and NR151B. Type of structures along these sections is not very much different. They can be classified into types and category12 as in below table. All structures are classified into four categories in which each category has different types.

Table 6.4: Compensation Rates for Stall, Shop and House Unit Type Wall Column Floor No. of Floor Cost ($/m2)

STALL, SHOP AND HOUSE

1a No wall Small pole for Use soil as floor Single 3.70 (stall on ROW) supporting roof structure

1b Thatch/ Leave Pole or used wood Used wood or Single: 0.3m-0.6m 7.04 bamboo with small higher than natural wood or bamboo soil structure, higher from soil about 0.3m-0.6m

1c Thatch/ Leaves or Pole or used wood Bamboo or used Single: 8.76 partly metal wood or mix of House-on-still;

1. Thatch/Leave1. Roof bamboo and wood Ground floor is soil; with small wooden more than 2.0 -2.5 structure meters high

12 The structure’s category and type in this study is not equivalence to same category in other study (in Southeast Section).

86 Appendix 2

Unit Type Wall Column Floor No. of Floor Cost ($/m2)

1d Used wood/ wood Pole or used wood Concrete floor Single 12.06 with thatch (10-15% of total wall area) 2a No (selling stall on Pole No: use soil as floor Single 6.68 ROW) 2b Thatch/ thatch and Pole/ wood - Bamboo/ used Single 12.10 used wood wood: (15-20%) 0.3m-0.6m high from ground - Concrete floor: on compacted ground 2c Metal Pole/ wood Concrete floor on Single 14.77 compacted land/ raised land of less than 20cm high 2d Wood/ Brick with no Pole/ wood Concrete floor on Single 15.06

plaster compacted soil 2e Wood/ Brick with no Pole/ wood - Concrete floor Single: 0.30m-0.60m 20.29 plaster on compacted above soil soil - Wood floor: 0.30m-0.60m above soil 2f Thatch -Concrete column at House on still: Single: 26.55 from ground Bamboo or used House-on-still; -Wood column/ pole wood with wooden Ground floor is soil; on upper floor structure more than 2.0 -2.5 2. Metal/ Fiber CementMetal/ 2. Roof meters high 2g Metal 80% and Pole/ wood House on still: Single: 27.10 Thatch 20% wood with wooden House-on-still; structure Ground floor is soil; more than 2.0 -2.5 meters high 2h Brick with Concrete Tile on compacted Single: only ground 35.45 plastering: exterior soil floor and interior 2i Wood wall - Concrete for first - Compacted soil at Single: 36.37 floor ground floor House-on-still; - Wood column on - Wood floor with Ground floor is soil; first floor wooden structure more than 2.0 -2.5 on first floor meters high 3a Thatch: for house Wood Wood with wooden Single: 42.48

on still structure House-on-still; Ground floor is soil;

Roof more than 2.0 -2.5 3. Tile Tile 3. meters high

87 Appendix 2

Unit Type Wall Column Floor No. of Floor Cost ($/m2)

3b Wood plank with - Concrete from Wood with wooden Single: 49.85 wooden structure ground structure House-on-still; - Wood on first floor Ground floor is soil; more than 2.0 -2.5 meters high 4a Brick wall Concrete column Ground floor and One story plus half 99.75 with foundation mezzanine (half floor with concrete floor) slab (compensation rate for this type is based on every affected floor area) 4b Brick wall Concrete column Ground floor, Multiple stories 140.96 with foundation mezzanine, first house (compensation 4. Concrete4. floor and possibility rate for this type is of additional floor based on every house affected floor area)

6.3.2 Cost Calculation of Fence and Gate

30. The road project will need to remove some property fences of different classification. Material chosen will alter the cost of building a fence and gate. Below costing the summary table of fence and gate based on market rate of construction material available in the project area.

Type Description Unit Unit Cost Remark US Dollar A FENCE

f 1 Loose Fence (palm leave, bamboo, small 1 LM 0.83 Some of the materials used not wooden bar or mix of available local available in the market. In this material) case labor cost will be estimated for the calculation f 2 Wooden post with bamboo rebar or wood 1 LM 1.78 rebar f 3 Concrete post 1.5meter interval, 1.5 meter 1 LM 4.52 high with 8 horizontal wire f 4 Concrete post 2meter interval; brick wall at 1 LM 12.20 lower part with plastering both sides of about 60-80cm; 2 meters high (from ground) with wire or wire mesh; brick wall at lower part 0.3m-0.6m high f 5 Concrete Post with plastering brick wall; 1 LM 34.20 Ventilation brick in some as part of 1.6m-2.0m high; 3.5m-4.0m interval brick wall also classified in same type f 6 Concrete column with plastering brick wall 1 LM 61.15 of 20cm; 1.8m-2.2m high; 3.5m-4.0m interval; decorative concrete baluster and decoration capital B GATE

88 Appendix 2

Type Description Unit Unit Cost Remark US Dollar 1 Main entrance gate with 0.4m-0.6m LS 131.26 column of 2.0m-2.5m high; Steel door 2 School entrance or other public property LS 190.26 Public property. Fence will entrance compensated based on above type.

6.3.3 Cost Calculation of Other Structure

31. To get the cost of this structure it is also based on the interview with local people for their knowledge, labor cost together with price list from construction material shops.

Item Description Unit Unit Rate Remark US Dollar OTHER STRUCTURE 1 Dug well (with concrete ring 800mm) 1 80.00 and 6-12 meters depth 2 Pumped well 1 120.00 3 Earth grave 1 1800.00 4 Concrete in front of house 1m2 5.59 5 Concrete block 1m2 5.67 6 Terracotta 1m2 7.89 7 Main hold 1m x 1m LS 33.64 8 Brick drainage 1LM 30.00 1 meter depth, 1 meter wide with concrete cover 9 Drainage pipe, dia. 40cm 1LM 11.19 10 Dug pond 1m2 6.00 2.0m-2.5m depth 11 Front roof extension (metal roof) 1m2 14.00 12 Walk passage into people’s property 1m2 3.50 For structure that not able to move as it may damage more than 50%. Full compensation is recommended.

LABOR COST TO SET-BACK STRUCTURE 1 Labor to remove wooden passage LS 5.00 crossing small canal into house 2 Labor to set-back stall from COI LS 15.00 Stall with thatch roof/wall shall be compensated 100% 3 Labor to set-back house from COI LS 75.00 For distance not more than 15 meters from existing location

6.3.4 Land Value Estimation

32. The land market in Cambodia has very little sign of going up in urban area. From interview with local people, village chief and other property owner the land in rural area has no activity at all since the down turn of world economic. Up to now there is no transaction in the study area, according to commune chief along the project influence area.

89 Appendix 2

33. According to the data collection (from group discussion and interview with commune chief) the price of land was calculated based on its category. Definition of land category are as following:

a. Commercial Land: Land near National Road Number 5 (near junction of NR5 and NR150B; NR150B and NR53). b. Resident-cum-commercial land: refer to land or house serves as living and also doing business i.e near market or build-up area in rural, mostly at district level. c. Residential land: land along the study road where village is located or vacant land within the village area. d. Agriculture land: land for doing agriculture purpose along road project. e. Forest land: land that is far from village and is chiefly covered with small trees and undergrowth.

34. Except from junction of NR5 and NR150B to riverside, the rest of national roads are pass through similar category of land i.e. residential, agriculture and forestland. The average cost of land can be summarized in below table.

No. Category of Land Average Price / Remark m2 US Dollar National Road NR150B, NR53 and NR151B 1 Commercial 105.00 Market area near NR5 and junction of NR150B and NR53 2 Resident-cum-commercial 28.68 Taches and Teuk Phos 3 Resident 8.08 4 Agriculture 1.20 5 Forest land 0.18

6.3.5 Crops and Trees

35. In order to simplify the study, trees have been classified in three types as following:

a. Sapling- below one year: will not get compensation as it can be re-planted, b. Small tree- one to three year: 1/3 of full price, c. Young tree- bearing some fruit: 2/3 of full price, d. Mature- full bearing tree: compensate full price.

36. From the survey, full compensation cost of trees is calculated and summary in below table:

No. Type Unit Unit Cost Remark US Dollar TREE 1 Mango Tree 48.81 2 Coconut Tree 44.37 3 Tamarin Tree 38.33 4 Lemon/Lime Tree 36.66 5 Jack Tree 42.50

90 Appendix 2

No. Type Unit Unit Cost Remark US Dollar 6 Custard apple Tree 13.58 7 Sugar Palm tree Tree 46.75 8 Bamboo Tree 0.30 9 Acacia/ Eucalyptus Tree 6.25 10 Cashew Tree 21.75 11 Pring tree Tree 24.28 12 Kantuort Tree 5.83 13 Jujube Tree 5.00 14 Kro khob Tree 2.25 15 Ampil Teuk Tree 12.60 16 Sdao Tree 12.50 17 Chom-phu Tree 6.00 18 Oy Moy Tree 5.00 19 Sandoricum tree Tree 10.00 20 Kor Tree 5.50 21 Krasang Tree 25.00 22 Makak Tree 12.88 23 Chrey Krem Tree 5.00 24 Tkov Tree 8.00 25 Trakob Barang Tree 11.50 26 Ka ngork Tree 7.50 27 Deum Chhat Tree 5.00 28 Kvet Tree 13.46 29 Orange Tree 26.00 30 Areca nut tree Tree 17.50 31 Ampil Teuk Tree 12.50 32 Guava Tree 7.75 33 Longan Tree 30.00 34 Teuk Doh Kor Tree 31.25 35 Leung Reach Tree 5.00 36 Others Tree 4.00 to 15.00 CROP 1 Papaya Tree 5.00 2 Banana Tree 2.77

7. Recommendation for Replacement Cost Implementation

37. The compensation of the affected structure will be calculated based on the affected floor area at market price for every development projects in Cambodia. During IOL survey it is found that:

a. Some of the structures are partially affected; b. Some structures can setback; c. Some structures of type 2 and 3 can cut and repair with not much difficult and disturbance; and

91 Appendix 2

d. Structure of type 4 is very hard to cut or dismantle, as it is concrete structure that has fixed foundation. Compensation to only affected structure cannot cover its replacement cost since the damage will be bigger than estimated (affected square meter of floor area x market price of structure).

38. Based on the above findings, it is recommended that:

No. Structure type Recommendation

1 Type I If the column is fix into the soil, 100% compensation if setback or relocated, regardless if it is partially affected 2 Type II Compensation based on affected floor area of the structure 3 Type III Compensation based on affected floor area of the structure 4 Type IV During implementation, compensation should not be based on affected area if it is partially affected from road axis to the front of house (less than 3meters).

The replacement cost calculation for this type is: Width of affected structure x 3/4 meters of first two columns (first span) x market rate per floor area.

92 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland No. Code Side Household Commune (m2) (m2) (m2) House House and Store Store/ Shop 1 53 L Mom Saphy Sangkhor 126 Partial 2 6 R Noun Somarn Sangkhor 28 48 Partial 3 67 L Chan Sinat Sangkhor 90 Entire 4 21 R Owner not available Sangkhor 500 Entire 5 3 L Leav Soun Sangkhor 350 Entire 6 15 L Put Saran Sangkhor 280 Entire 7 55 L Hei Chourn Sangkhor 280 Partial 8 31 L Meak Phalla Sangkhor 157.5 Entire 9 45 L Mao Kunthea Sangkhor 126 Entire 10 51 L Owner not available Sangkhor 114 Partial 11 27 L Sin Makara Sangkhor 90 Partial 12 23 L Tae Chorn Sangkhor 75 Entire 13 17 L Mob Chan Sangkhor 60 Partial 14 20 R Paen Sokha Sangkhor 54 Entire 15 63 L Prak Net Sangkhor 37.5 Entire 16 73 L Chark Chorn Sangkhor 36 Entire 17 32 R Orn Saran Sangkhor 24 Entire 18 50 R Neang Cheanorna Sangkhor 20 Partial 19 19 L Ghean Chan Sangkhor 18 Partial 20 5 L Langh Keomleang Sangkhor 16 Entire 21 58 R Saom Sreymom Sangkhor 13 Partial 22 8 R Owner not available Sangkhor 12 Entire 23 61 L Mom Sarourn Sangkhor 12 Entire 24 13 L Pop Anararn Sangkhor 12 Entire 25 37 R Kheav Vanny Sangkhor 185 Partial 26 18 R Morn Vanaroum Sangkhor 168 Partial 27 48 R Haor Muoy Sangkhor 112.5 Partial 28 78 R Owner not available Sangkhor 96 Partial

93 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland No. Code Side Household Commune (m2) (m2) (m2) House House and Store Store/ Shop 29 35 L Khut Hourn Sangkhor 60 Partial 30 66 R Mom Tha Sangkhor 60 Partial 31 71 L Mao Phally Sangkhor 40 Partial 32 57 L Pich Sitha Sangkhor 39 Partial 33 64 R Owner not available Sangkhor 30 Entire 34 38 R Meas Chinda Sangkhor 18 Entire 35 29 L Meak Vantha Sangkhor 12 Entire 36 81 L Pov Socheat Sangkhor 10 Partial 37 42 R Owner not available Sangkhor 9 Partial 38 12 R Chaiy Veasna Sangkhor 8 Partial 39 79 L Pov Vichet Sangkhor 5.5 Partial 40 83 L So Somart Sangkhor 32 41 75 L Reach Someourn Sangkhor 4 42 Sangkhor Sangkhor 5820

43 43 L Owner not available Sangkhor 400 44 70 R Owner not available Sangkhor 180 45 49 L Saus Sovan Sangkhor 168 46 72 R Owner not available Sangkhor 160 47 4 R Owner not available Sangkhor 150 48 47 L Sok Saoun Sangkhor 150 49 59 L Bun Thoul Sangkhor 133 50 68 R Peork Savun Sangkhor 120 51 1 L Saom Chanthy Sangkhor 120 52 39 L Owner not available Sangkhor 116 53 33 R Owner not available Sangkhor 112 54 62 R Owner not available Sangkhor 110 55 2 R Owner not available Sangkhor 106 56 94 R Owner not available Sangkhor 100 57 82 R Nhem Sitha Sangkhor 100

94 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland No. Code Side Household Commune (m2) (m2) (m2) House House and Store Store/ Shop 58 25 L Owner not available Sangkhor 94 59 46 R Owner not available Sangkhor 78 60 16 R Meong Sararn Sangkhor 74 61 52 R Van Sophana Sangkhor 72 62 10 R Owner not available Sangkhor 70 63 24 R Owner not available Sangkhor 69 64 65 L Em Someourn Sangkhor 66 65 56 R Kaov Somol Sangkhor 57 66 34 R Owner not available Sangkhor 50 67 26 R Owner not available Sangkhor 44 68 54 R Owner not available Sangkhor 44 69 41 L Srey Euom Sangkhor 40 70 22 R Owner not available Sangkhor 35 71 36 R Owner not available Sangkhor 35 72 30 R Sos Samala Sangkhor 35 73 80 R Chab Phalla Sangkhor 32 74 9 L Sous Sear Sangkhor 30 75 14 R Kol Savun Sangkhor 30 76 7 L Pich Sinong Sangkhor 20 77 11 L Sin Komphaerk Sangkhor 20 78 69 L Sok Sarnd Sangkhor 19 79 28 R Hum Sokda Sangkhor 14 80 60 R Owner not available Sangkhor 12 81 89 R Owner not available Sangkhor 10 82 85 L Owner not available Sangkhor 9 83 40 R Eaem Bros Sangkhor 9 84 77 L Chan Shart Sangkhor 8 85 76 R Doch Sitha Sangkhor 5 86 216 R Vea Sanorn Kampong Chak 368 Entire

95 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland No. Code Side Household Commune (m2) (m2) (m2) House House and Store Store/ Shop 87 179 L Kheom Sophy Kampong Chak 279 Partial 88 248 R Sao Sarin Kampong Chak 117 Entire 89 192 R Srey Oark Kampong Chak 90 Partial 90 234 R So Seorn Kampong Chak 78 Entire 91 212 R Chab Den Kampong Chak 55 Partial 92 232 R Ouk Peng Kampong Chak 45 Entire 93 244 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 40 Partial 94 242 R Chin Raen Kampong Chak 37 Entire 95 173 R Sem Bontuern Kampong Chak 30 Partial 96 88 R kong Rith Kampong Chak 20 Partial 97 181 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 18 Partial 98 175 L Sem Bonton Kampong Chak 11 Entire 99 93 L Arn Rithy Kampong Chak 8 Partial 100 168 R Touch Sarith Kampong Chak 31.5 Partial 101 176 R Yuong Vanny Kampong Chak 3 Partial 102 151 L Men Saren Kampong Chak 65.6 Partial 103 159 L Pong Savon Kampong Chak 24.8 Partial 104 95 L Koy Chinda Kampong Chak 22 Partial 105 177 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 183 Partial 106 202 R Keom Sakhorn Kampong Chak 165 Partial 107 183 L Thorn Boraen Kampong Chak 110 Partial 108 138 R Horm Somart Kampong Chak 76 Entire 109 180 R Seing Heang Kampong Chak 60 Entire 110 166 R Mom Phal Kampong Chak 45 Partial 111 123 L Laiy Ky Kampong Chak 40 Partial 112 160 R Agen Sochea Kampong Chak 40 Partial 113 174 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 35 Partial 114 150 R Agou Vannary Kampong Chak 34 Partial 115 172 R Toch Veasna Kampong Chak 33.6 Partial

96 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland No. Code Side Household Commune (m2) (m2) (m2) House House and Store Store/ Shop 116 210 R Som Sindara Kampong Chak 33 Partial 117 198 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 24 Entire 118 156 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 20 Partial 119 190 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 20 Partial 120 154 R Chear Lung Kampong Chak 20 Entire 121 182 R Eaek Sokhom Kampong Chak 20 Partial 122 188 R Bo Kosal Kampong Chak 20 Partial 123 170 R Mouk Chantha Kampong Chak 18 Partial 124 144 R Ngen Thoun Kampong Chak 16 Partial 125 178 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 8 Partial 126 184 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 8 Partial 127 186 R Porng Charoun Kampong Chak 8 Partial 128 139 L Yeon Horn Kampong Chak 46.8 129 137 L koy Bophal Kampong Chak 46.8 130 119 L Raot Someourn Kampong Chak 56 131 145 L Chea Net Kampong Chak 28 132 117 L Raort Someourn Kampong Chak 24 133 129 L Preab Chantha Kampong Chak 18 134 208 R Tey Sokong Kampong Chak 15 135 87 L Yonh Sarorn Kampong Chak 12.5 136 Kampong Chak Kampong Chak 610

137 230 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 312 138 236 R Kort Saphart Kampong Chak 300 139 113 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 200 140 96 R Ou Rady Kampong Chak 180 141 169 L Som Sindara Kampong Chak 115 142 99 :L Kong Chan Kampong Chak 108 143 143 L Ngun Kan Kampong Chak 104 144 218 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 96

97 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland No. Code Side Household Commune (m2) (m2) (m2) House House and Store Store/ Shop 145 214 R Ghorn Somnang Kampong Chak 92.5 146 90 R Mao Chanra Kampong Chak 90 147 163 L Yem Sain Kampong Chak 87.5 148 220 R Eaek Nourn Kampong Chak 84 149 224 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 81.4 150 125 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 64 151 111 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 56 152 238 R Paen Sitha Kampong Chak 56 153 240 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 54 154 246 R Sor Pleak Kampong Chak 52 155 162 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 51 156 228 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 51 157 106 R Ork Orn Kampong Chak 49 158 127 L Keaov Sounry Kampong Chak 48 159 142 R Hem Rathy Kampong Chak 48 160 204 R Pich Heng Kampong Chak 45 161 167 L En Mara Kampong Chak 43 162 108 R Sok Chanthorn Kampong Chak 41 163 101 L Horm Somoun Kampong Chak 40 164 194 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 39 165 122 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 39 166 97 L khen Savorn Kampong Chak 38 167 92 R Mao Chanra Kampong Chak 36 168 131 L Paen Kunthea Kampong Chak 35 169 140 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 34.5 170 120 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 32 171 100 R Peang Sourn Kampong Chak 32 172 171 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 30 173 149 L Koy Ang Kampong Chak 30

98 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland No. Code Side Household Commune (m2) (m2) (m2) House House and Store Store/ Shop 174 130 R Van Hong Kampong Chak 29.8 175 102 R Gheom Sophal Kampong Chak 28 176 200 R Hor Sarun Kampong Chak 28 177 206 R Nou Samut Kampong Chak 25 178 124 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 24 179 141 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 24 180 118 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 24 181 155 L Doch Sitha Kampong Chak 24 182 94 R Ngun Chenda Kampong Chak 24 183 98 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 21 184 229 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 20 185 158 R Som Saophaurn Kampong Chak 20 186 121 L Sun Chea Kampong Chak 20 187 91 L Chab Panha Kampong Chak 18 188 84 R Eoung Phea Kampong Chak 18 189 112 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 16 190 132 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 16 191 148 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 16 192 146 R Ngen Ra Kampong Chak 16 193 164 R Rous Nary Kampong Chak 16 194 152 R Saem Lynna Kampong Chak 16 195 222 R Nay Sor Kampong Chak 14 196 116 R Tit Sophal Kampong Chak 14 197 114 R Pich Saran Kampong Chak 14 198 161 L Eom Sokha Kampong Chak 14 199 128 R Bei Sinart Kampong Chak 13.4 200 134 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 13 201 115 L Preeab Vuthy Kampong Chak 12.9 202 107 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 12

99 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland No. Code Side Household Commune (m2) (m2) (m2) House House and Store Store/ Shop 203 103 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 12 204 110 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 12 205 196 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 12 206 135 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 12 207 153 L Meas Kala Kampong Chak 12 208 157 L Maen Vanno Kampong Chak 12 209 133 L Sok Sanourn Kampong Chak 12 210 147 L Kem Oun Kampong Chak 12 211 226 R Mok Samet Kampong Chak 10.8 212 105 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 10 213 126 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 10 214 86 R Yun Solaod Kampong Chak 10 215 109 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 9 216 104 R Peng Charly Kampong Chak 8 217 136 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 4 218 165 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 219 282 R Nhean Sara Sangkae 200 Entire 220 215 L Vong Ban Sangkae 164 Entire 221 205 L Pov Sareon Sangkae 156 Partial 222 274 R Vong Soka Sangkae 148 Entire 223 207 L Vong Sary Sangkae 130 Partial 224 191 L Owner not available Sangkae 120 Partial 225 235 L Nuon Khemsoly Sangkae 112 Entire 226 280 R Ou Savan Sangkae 110 Partial 227 254 R Chai Rith Sangkae 77 Entire 228 284 R Paen Someourn Sangkae 72 Partial 229 237 L Kem Leok Sangkae 68 Entire 230 189 L Ping Somant Sangkae 53.8 Entire 231 262 R Hun Sangh Sangkae 45 Partial

100 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland No. Code Side Household Commune (m2) (m2) (m2) House House and Store Store/ Shop 232 203 R Meas Sal Sangkae 40 Partial 233 278 R Kheom Horn Sangkae 30 Partial 234 223 L Ky Chanthy Sangkae 20 Entire 235 276 R Som Raksa Sangkae 196 Entire 236 185 L Owner not available Sangkae 70 Entire 237 195 L Sen Savan Sangkae 48 Partial 238 213 L Mok Sangkae 46 Partial 239 231 L Agom Heng Sangkae 32 Partial 240 225 L Owner not available Sangkae 30 Entire 241 199 L Som Saphan Sangkae 24 Partial 242 227 L Yen Nimit Sangkae 20 Partial 243 219 L Meong Soun Sangkae 12 Entire 244 221 L Thy Chuomneagh Sangkae 8 Entire 245 Sangkae Sangkae 1780

246 233 L Chuom Sitha Sangkae 186 247 264 R Tem Net Sangkae 161 248 252 R Agoum Sinon Sangkae 148 249 197 L Owner not available Sangkae 144 250 260 R Key Kheorn Sangkae 120 251 217 R Kem Por Sangkae 104 252 266 R Ey Som Sangkae 96 253 268 R Owner not available Sangkae 78 254 256 R Peong Southy Sangkae 72 255 209 L Owner not available Sangkae 70 256 258 R Prum Sokhom Sangkae 66.5 257 250 R Owner not available Sangkae 66 258 187 R Owner not available Sangkae 60 259 193 L Real Vantha Sangkae 44 260 211 L Nhem Seak Sangkae 27.5

101 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland No. Code Side Household Commune (m2) (m2) (m2) House House and Store Store/ Shop 261 288 R Eoung Meang Sangkae 24 262 286 R Yard Sina Sangkae 22.5 263 201 L Pin Ant Sangkae 20 264 270 R Pin Sinat Sangkae 16.5 265 272 R Owner not available Sangkae 8 266 304 R Horn Sarin Chrung Popel 34 Entire 267 253 L Pov Saarn Chrung Popel 200 Entire 268 263 L Sem Kim Chrung Popel 42 Entire 269 334 R Heang Sookha Chrung Popel 39.6 Partial 270 338 R Owner not available Chrung Popel 20 Entire 271 251 L Koy Know Chrung Popel 20 Entire 272 239 L Som Saran Chrung Popel Partial 273 316 R Taong Peangly Chrung Popel 182 Partial 274 259 L Chy Chaun Chrung Popel 40 Partial 275 249 L Kaov Pong Chrung Popel 36 Entire 276 255 L Porn Parn Chrung Popel 35 Partial 277 336 R Pov Phyone Chrung Popel 35 Entire 278 312 R Chem Somoun Chrung Popel 22 Partial 279 265 L En Dara Chrung Popel 16 Partial 280 267 L Prak Sarem Chrung Popel 15 Partial 281 247 L Prak Chanra Chrung Popel 14 Partial 282 257 L Pov Sameurn Chrung Popel 12.5 Partial 283 241 L Owner not available Chrung Popel 11 Entire 284 245 L Bo Rithy Chrung Popel 5 Partial 285 243 L Owner not available Chrung Popel 4.5 Partial 286 292 R Owner not available Chrung Popel 120 287 300 R Peach Sarorn Chrung Popel 68 288 314 R Pich Sarin Chrung Popel 66.2 289 308 R Neob Norn Chrung Popel 33

102 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland No. Code Side Household Commune (m2) (m2) (m2) House House and Store Store/ Shop 290 Chrung Popel Chrung Popel 1830

291 332 R Nong Vana Chrung Popel 307.5 292 290 R Owner not available Chrung Popel 210 293 346 R Seong Sophart Chrung Popel 200 294 298 R Sao Sophal Chrung Popel 142.5 295 326 R Owner not available Chrung Popel 120 296 324 R Kov Neang Chrung Popel 120 297 296 R Chan Chorn Chrung Popel 80 298 273 L Owner not available Chrung Popel 66 299 294 R Soun Satja Chrung Popel 60 300 320 R Sea Sisophorn Chrung Popel 54 301 271 L Khen Nourn Chrung Popel 52.5 302 269 L Owner not available Chrung Popel 47.1 303 322 R Kong Someak Chrung Popel 41.8 304 310 R Teib Chantha Chrung Popel 40 305 302 R Yi Sarin Chrung Popel 40 306 261 L Owner not available Chrung Popel 30 307 318 R Ghorn Sophea Chrung Popel 28 308 328 R Pov Dara Chrung Popel 27 309 340 R Soun Kim Chrung Popel 21 310 330 R Nut Saraen Chrung Popel 18 311 342 R Van Bunrorn Chrung Popel 12 312 306 R Kao Oun Chrung Popel 9 313 344 R Yen Nourn Chrung Popel 5 314 285 L Toch Saban Kampong Ampil 40 Entire Entire 315 289 L Mork Toch Kampong Ampil 80 Partial 316 287 L Noun Ra Kampong Ampil 14 Entire 317 275 L Sous Sokhom Kampong Ampil 12 Entire 318 279 L Chan Laord Kampong Ampil 64 Entire

103 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland No. Code Side Household Commune (m2) (m2) (m2) House House and Store Store/ Shop 319 378 R Chan Saban Kampong Ampil 18 Entire 320 283 L Owner not available Kampong Ampil 16 Entire 321 277 L Owner not available Kampong Ampil 8 Partial 322 352 R Vea Thea Kampong Ampil 6 Partial 323 281 L Morn Somporse Kampong Ampil 10 Entire 324 Kampong Ampil Kampong Ampil 370

325 348 R Leok Suod Kampong Ampil 160 326 356 L Owner not available Kampong Ampil 50 327 350 R Khourn Sarin Kampong Ampil 48 328 354 R Kaort Sothuon Kampong Ampil 20 329 414 R Sao Lin Angk Prasrae 12 Partial 330 426 R Ou Sophal Angk Prasrae 20 Entire 331 333 L Kong Tharn Angk Prasrae 12 Partial 332 456 R Chan Sameon Angk Prasrae 136 Partial 333 369 L Vel Saruon Angk Prasrae 45 Entire 334 295 L Chem Sararn Angk Prasrae 32 Partial 335 351 L Kong Saroun Angk Prasrae 24 Entire 336 458 R Kheive Sarong Angk Prasrae 27 Entire 337 398 R Sors Romly Angk Prasrae 25 Partial 338 392 R Laorn Thy Angk Prasrae 24 Partial 339 335 L Mom Chourn Angk Prasrae 24 Partial 340 341 L Mao Nan Angk Prasrae 21 Partial 341 337 L Ou Cheng Angk Prasrae 16 Partial 342 430 R Owner not available Angk Prasrae 15 Partial 343 432 R Ouk Varn Angk Prasrae 15 Partial 344 349 L Mork Savart Angk Prasrae 10 Partial 345 Angk Prasrae Angk Prasrae 1850 48

346 327 L Kaeov Piset Angk Prasrae 6 20 347 434 R Mao Nan Angk Prasrae 20

104 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland No. Code Side Household Commune (m2) (m2) (m2) House House and Store Store/ Shop 348 424 R Hao Vong Angk Prasrae 28 349 442 R Kong Tharn Angk Prasrae 20 350 331 L Chaom Mao Angk Prasrae 16 351 404 R Peaok Karith Angk Prasrae 15 352 410 R Eong Hong Angk Prasrae 13.5 353 446 R Pao Sapoun Angk Prasrae 12 354 317 R Mork Toch Angk Prasrae 12 355 358 R Prak Sareom Angk Prasrae 180 356 291 L Peong Vanna Angk Prasrae 150 357 343 L Nong Saly Angk Prasrae 100 358 329 L En Sarin Angk Prasrae 69 359 448 R Owner not available Angk Prasrae 66 360 460 R Owner not available Angk Prasrae 46 361 293 L Owner not available Angk Prasrae 40 362 368 R Kim Yen Angk Prasrae 38 363 366 R Owner not available Angk Prasrae 32 364 303 L Eaem Sokhom Angk Prasrae 28 365 299 L Paen Choun Angk Prasrae 27 366 339 L Ping Vanna Angk Prasrae 27 367 362 R Owner not available Angk Prasrae 26 368 408 R Ngoy Nasim Angk Prasrae 26 369 396 R Oung Sokhom Angk Prasrae 25 370 420 R Hao Va Angk Prasrae 25 371 388 R Srey Kheang Angk Prasrae 24 372 412 R Orng Sokhoum Angk Prasrae 24 373 386 R Pol Porn Angk Prasrae 24 374 390 R Owner not available Angk Prasrae 22 375 374 R Owner not available Angk Prasrae 20 376 372 R Mao Kosal Angk Prasrae 20

105 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland No. Code Side Household Commune (m2) (m2) (m2) House House and Store Store/ Shop 377 402 R Svaiy Eaom Angk Prasrae 20 378 364 R Heom Sakum Angk Prasrae 20 379 370 R Chea Sotheany Angk Prasrae 20 380 436 R Paen Lun Angk Prasrae 20 381 416 R Eaem Yorn Angk Prasrae 20 382 400 R Eang Sokhom Angk Prasrae 20 383 307 L Bal Sokheoun Angk Prasrae 18 384 440 R Ping Vanna Angk Prasrae 18 385 323 L Eng Khorn Angk Prasrae 16 386 428 R Pich Saran Angk Prasrae 16 387 418 R Hun Lei Angk Prasrae 16 388 454 R Cheang Two Angk Prasrae 16 389 422 R Chan Sombat Angk Prasrae 16 390 394 R Paen Chun Angk Prasrae 15 391 311 L Sao Noy Angk Prasrae 15 392 376 R Nong Peon Angk Prasrae 15 393 309 L Brak Chaort Angk Prasrae 15 394 313 L Ngoy Sina Angk Prasrae 15 395 325 L Saom Mun Angk Prasrae 15 396 444 R Charng Veay Angk Prasrae 15 397 305 L Oum Chang Angk Prasrae 14 398 384 R Owner not available Angk Prasrae 13 399 360 R Owner not available Angk Prasrae 13 400 452 R Gheam Chan Angk Prasrae 12.5 401 321 L Owner not available Angk Prasrae 12 402 345 L Nong Houy Angk Prasrae 12 403 450 R Koy Sat Angk Prasrae 12 404 438 R Maen Saleang Angk Prasrae 12 405 315 L Eaem Eourn Angk Prasrae 12

106 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland No. Code Side Household Commune (m2) (m2) (m2) House House and Store Store/ Shop 406 406 R Keov Sokha Angk Prasrae 12 407 301 L Ou Cheng Angk Prasrae 12 408 382 R Owner not available Angk Prasrae 10 409 380 R Laek Sreynourn Angk Prasrae 10 410 319 L Prak Rorn Angk Prasrae 8 411 297 L Owner not available Angk Prasrae 7.5 412 347 L Preab Sung Angk Prasrae 6 413 365 L Mean Senglone Andoung Pou 45 Partial 414 468 R Kaov Orn Andoung Pou 160 Partial 415 490 R Kem Saophea Andoung Pou 100 Partial 416 488 R Rouas Kao Andoung Pou 80 Partial 417 367 L Saom Chinda Andoung Pou 40 Entire 418 480 R Preab Somnang Andoung Pou 28 Partial 419 357 L Pruom Chorn Andoung Pou 15 Entire 420 355 L Meak Sokhourn Andoung Pou 90 Partial 421 472 R Chea Chanthy Andoung Pou 81 Entire 422 474 R Proum Saran Andoung Pou 48 Entire 423 359 L Pich Sapourn Andoung Pou 24 Entire 424 363 L Chab Dara Andoung Pou 15 Partial 425 Andoung Pou Andoung Pou 2540 60

426 476 R Pich Moneiy Andoung Pou 48 427 478 R Chab Savourn Andoung Pou 14 428 492 R Owner not available Andoung Pou 200 429 484 R Sek Saophea Andoung Pou 160 430 353 L Owner not available Andoung Pou 150 431 464 R Owner not available Andoung Pou 120 432 466 R Va Chean Andoung Pou 80 433 470 R Prak Dorn Andoung Pou 75 434 486 R Saom Sarin Andoung Pou 70

107 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland No. Code Side Household Commune (m2) (m2) (m2) House House and Store Store/ Shop 435 462 R Owner not available Andoung Pou 68 436 482 R Van Saraen Andoung Pou 60 437 578 R Preab Chhuern Kampong Trach 57 Partial 438 435 L Va King Kampong Trach 8 Entire 439 391 L Chak Prom Kampong Trach 96 Partial 440 494 R Ma Kearithy Kampong Trach 90 Entire 441 371 L Prugh Norb Kampong Trach 60 Partial 442 379 L Ben Song Kampong Trach 48 Partial 443 594 R Ouk Saren Kampong Trach 37 Partial 444 506 R Rath Yol Kampong Trach 36 Partial 445 649 L Prom Sean Kampong Trach 30 Entire 446 643 L Sau Pin Kampong Trach 30 Entire 447 651 L Kong Sarun Kampong Trach 28 Entire 448 510 L Kong Thy Kampong Trach 27 Partial 449 361 L Sok Dy Kampong Trach 16 Entire 450 415 L Hei Ratna Kampong Trach 9 Entire 451 542 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 6 Partial 452 552 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 4.5 Partial 453 546 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 3.5 Partial 454 548 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 3.5 Partial 455 544 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 3 Partial 456 375 L Ted Borarnd Kampong Trach Partial 457 540 R Chue Oun Kampong Trach 47.5 Partial 458 573 L Bras eang Kampong Trach 28.5 Partial 459 671 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 150 Partial 460 655 L Kert Siruern Kampong Trach 105 Entire 461 610 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 100 Partial 462 405 L Yan Chouch Kampong Trach 52 Partial 463 417 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 47.5 Partial

108 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland No. Code Side Household Commune (m2) (m2) (m2) House House and Store Store/ Shop 464 524 R Ghean Sovany Kampong Trach 40 Entire 465 669 L Hon Nuern Kampong Trach 32 Partial 466 520 R Paen Saroun Kampong Trach 24 Partial 467 592 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 20 Partial 468 526 R Kem San Kampong Trach 20 Entire 469 617 L Kim Sopheap Kampong Trach 18 Partial 470 539 L Luerng man Kampong Trach 17 Partial 471 383 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 16 Entire 472 605 L Sok Chay Kampong Trach 13.5 Partial 473 571 L Chea Sophan Kampong Trach 12.5 Partial 474 504 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 12 Partial 475 389 L Phat Savat Kampong Trach 12 Entire 476 556 R Teav Kun Kampong Trach 12 Partial 477 600 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 5 Partial 478 411 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 4.5 Partial 479 611 L En Yaen Kampong Trach 98 480 574 R Chea Youy Kampong Trach 63 481 479 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 5 48 482 597 L Chhen Von Kampong Trach 43 483 499 L Tep Chun Kampong Trach 36 484 536 R Seng Huern Kampong Trach 34 485 Kampong Trach Kampong Trach 30

486 465 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 23 487 547 L Nut Sim Kampong Trach 22.5 488 545 L Sorn Titouny Kampong Trach 20.3 489 461 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 20 490 575 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 18 491 535 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 18 492 439 L Hong Tei Kampong Trach 18

109 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland No. Code Side Household Commune (m2) (m2) (m2) House House and Store Store/ Shop 493 565 L Doung Savuern Kampong Trach 15 494 538 R Kem Sokom Kampong Trach 80 495 558 R Teav Vanna Kampong Trach 42 496 419 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 25 497 589 L Koev An Kampong Trach 25 498 505 L Leat Chuern Kampong Trach 25 499 601 L Va Tav Kampong Trach 22 500 584 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 20 501 615 L Mau Yon Kampong Trach 18 502 537 L Sok Oun Kampong Trach 18 503 433 L Chan Tha Kampong Trach 15 504 663 L Sok Ouk Kampong Trach 15 505 587 L Mey Chanton Kampong Trach 14 506 579 L Ly Kerng Kampong Trach 13.5 507 566 R Kong Samagon Kampong Trach 13.5 508 445 L Haem Sokha Kampong Trach 12 509 407 L Chan Sokha Kampong Trach 6 510 512 R Hem Yut Kampong Trach 150 511 409 L Kim Ron Kampong Trach 112 512 631 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 67 513 619 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 63 514 385 L Merng Sarith Kampong Trach 63 515 529 L Mao Kead Kampong Trach 63 516 519 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 60 517 572 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 57 518 421 L Chan Bonthuern Kampong Trach 56 519 639 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 55 520 407 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 52 521 443 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 40

110 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland No. Code Side Household Commune (m2) (m2) (m2) House House and Store Store/ Shop 522 509 L ACLEDA BANK Kampong Trach 40 523 580 R Soam Lon Kampong Trach 40 524 508 R Ork Chantha Kampong Trach 39 525 518 R Mom Ty Kampong Trach 36 526 453 L Chea Vantha Kampong Trach 36 527 623 L Kem Yat Kampong Trach 35 528 635 L Kuy Pech Kampong Trach 34 529 659 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 33 530 661 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 33 531 657 L Chay Savut Kampong Trach 33 532 500 R Ngaed Chan Kampong Trach 32 533 534 R Luern Man Kampong Trach 32 534 653 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 30 535 498 R Meong Sarith Kampong Trach 30 536 485 L Pork Sovana Kampong Trach 30 537 516 R Bras Sokon Kampong Trach 30 538 645 L Sam Lan Kampong Trach 30 539 401 L Toch Khorn Kampong Trach 30 540 593 L Chreong Sam Kampong Trach 27 541 483 L Chy Sophaon Kampong Trach 27 542 576 R Va Savat Kampong Trach 27 543 569 L Saom Manen Kampong Trach 27 544 507 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 25 545 588 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 25 546 429 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 25 547 489 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 25 548 525 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 25 549 555 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 25 550 557 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 25

111 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland No. Code Side Household Commune (m2) (m2) (m2) House House and Store Store/ Shop 551 625 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 25 552 641 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 25 553 521 L Yoak Sovan Kampong Trach 25 554 598 R Sao Lam Kampong Trach 25 555 561 L An Pech Kampong Trach 25 556 563 L Tep Kampong Trach 25 557 527 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 24 558 586 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 24 559 562 R Chhoa Soaphea Kampong Trach 24 560 532 R Luerng Keav Kampong Trach 24 561 543 L E Ratnak Kampong Trach 22.5 562 423 L Chhom Phal Kampong Trach 22.5 563 441 L Chen Suern Kampong Trach 22.5 564 554 R Teav Pouy Kampong Trach 21.3 565 568 R Srey Ta Kampong Trach 21 566 481 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 20 567 511 L Korean Centre Kampong Trach 20 568 477 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 20 569 495 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 20 570 562 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 20 571 621 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 20 572 627 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 20 573 629 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 20 574 633 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 20 575 523 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 20 576 581 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 20 577 590 L Sim Vonghan Kampong Trach 20 578 559 L Sterng Sachea Kampong Trach 20 579 612 R Em Savon Kampong Trach 20

112 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland No. Code Side Household Commune (m2) (m2) (m2) House House and Store Store/ Shop 580 339 L Lueok Pov Kampong Trach 20 581 451 L Dong Molykhun Kampong Trach 20 582 533 L Ou Sinun Kampong Trach 20 583 437 L Maen Kong Kampong Trach 18 584 609 L Dom Tara Kampong Trach 18 585 613 L Pech Agon Kampong Trach 18 586 585 L Khun Bolyna Kampong Trach 18 587 397 L Braeng Vanny Kampong Trach 18 588 528 R Chhem Chanra Kampong Trach 18 589 549 L Kem Yet Kampong Trach 18 590 463 L Yu Somart Kampong Trach 18 591 591 L Ngou Mao Kampong Trach 18 592 517 L Tun Sokom Kampong Trach 18 593 583 L Hei Cha Kampong Trach 18 594 603 L Chay May Kampong Trach 18 595 425 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 16 596 403 L Va Seng Kampong Trach 16 597 427 L Dok Vang Kampong Trach 16 598 431 L Ou Rathana Kampong Trach 16 599 377 L Chan Keong Kampong Trach 16 600 564 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 15 601 560 R Kem Nat Kampong Trach 15 602 503 L Kim Sokha Kampong Trach 15 603 497 L Kaem Agon Kampong Trach 15 604 513 L Meas Vantheon Kampong Trach 15 605 493 L Kau Sophal Kampong Trach 15 606 570 R Sterng Yan Kampong Trach 15 607 515 L Mi Rath Kampong Trach 15 608 531 L Sok Chea Kampong Trach 15

113 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland No. Code Side Household Commune (m2) (m2) (m2) House House and Store Store/ Shop 609 491 L Bras Salout Kampong Trach 15 610 553 L Cheom Thourn Kampong Trach 15 611 665 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 14 612 381 L Ban Kadin Kampong Trach 14 613 457 L Pov Peark Kampong Trach 14 614 581 L Teb Mao Kampong Trach 14 615 514 R Kim Veasna Kampong Trach 14 616 567 L Reach Tak Kampong Trach 14 617 413 L Duerk Saron Kampong Trach 13.5 618 607 L Kong Samagon Kampong Trach 13.5 619 637 L Oum Sophea Kampong Trach 13.5 620 455 L Pech Savy Kampong Trach 13.5 621 595 L Ly Sokhom Kampong Trach 13.5 622 459 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 13 623 599 L Kong Yong Kampong Trach 13 624 647 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 12 625 395 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 12 626 496 R Hun Ratha Kampong Trach 12 627 606 R Put Rasmey Kampong Trach 12 628 596 R Chen Sopheak Kampong Trach 12 629 471 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 10 630 473 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 10 631 475 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 10 632 469 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 10 633 608 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 10 634 522 R Seng Rany Kampong Trach 10 635 530 R Ouk Sarorn Kampong Trach 10 636 577 L Oum Sakhurn Kampong Trach 10 637 582 R Kong Tol Kampong Trach 10

114 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland No. Code Side Household Commune (m2) (m2) (m2) House House and Store Store/ Shop 638 467 L Ou Angy Kampong Trach 10 639 541 L Va Seng Kampong Trach 10 640 551 L Chen Salon Kampong Trach 10 641 447 L Ham Huern Kampong Trach 9 642 502 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 8 643 373 L Leang vuthy Kampong Trach 8 644 393 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 7 645 602 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 5.5 646 604 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 5 647 387 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 5 648 487 L Ream Setha Kampong Trach 5 649 501 L Luerng Minh Kampong Trach 5 650 449 L Ouk Thanin Kampong Trach 4.5 651 550 R Kong Vannak Kampong Trach 652 667 L Seng Samon Kampong Trach 653 689 L Koev Yan Amkpil 22.5 Partial 654 697 L Owner not available Amkpil 90 Entire 655 622 R Ti Savon Amkpil 83 Partial 656 681 L Owner not available Amkpil 25 Partial 657 695 L Owner not available Amkpil 25 Partial 658 679 L Owner not available Amkpil 20 Partial 659 683 L Owner not available Amkpil 20 Partial 660 693 L Owner not available Amkpil 12 Entire 661 699 L Owner not available Amkpil 4 Partial 662 Amkpil Amkpil 410

663 624 R Seng Lan Amkpil 48 664 691 L Sou Sabol Amkpil 42 665 620 R Keb Mil Amkpil 30 666 687 L Meav Yin Amkpil 18.8

115 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland No. Code Side Household Commune (m2) (m2) (m2) House House and Store Store/ Shop 667 685 L Ouch Kemsean Amkpil 17.5 668 701 L Kun Set Andoung Trabaek 14 Partial 669 703 L Prom Seng Andoung Trabaek 16 670 Andoung Trabaek Andoung Trabaek

671 630 R Pung Sarim Krabau 270 Entire 672 626 R Ream Phanna Krabau 1200 Entire 673 709 L Niy Chamnang Krabau 600 Entire 674 628 R Ream Mab Krabau 86 Partial 675 707 L Kat Sitha Krabau 12 676 'Krabau Krabau

116 Appendix 4

Summary of Pre-IOL Survey Consultations Held (South)

Agenda: Introduce purpose of the project and road section and what TA is all about Introduce survey team and date for conduct IOL and SES Why conducted IOL and ESE? Cut off date Minimize impact of the project

Location of Road Date of Meeting Number of No Section Meeting (District) Participants Concerns Raised by the People When this road will started construction? They proposed to construct this road as soon as possible, Proposed to build drainage along NR - 20 May 1 Svay Tep 13 road side, 314D 2011 Proposed to compensation for fruit trees and other threes make clear between compensation price for rural and urban land area,

make clear between compensation price for rural, urban land area and land near the Vietname Border proposed minimize impact of the NR - 21 May project for urban area 2 Kampong Ro 20 314D 2011 When this road will started construction? During relocated or moved back of structure propose to project to inform them at least two week first. proposed minimize impact of the project for urban area especially at Dumduol town If people that affected 100% of their land affected, where should their 21 May live? 3 NR - 13 Rom Duol 43 2011 When this road will started construction? All of properties that affected, the project will compensation or not? How price are compensation?

Propose to the project to rebuild drainage for them, because they just collected money with all of APs to build that drainage, don’t be 22 May Romeas 4 NR - 13 21 collected the money again, they 2011 Haek have no money. I am landless, how should the project solve problem for me? When this road will started

117

Appendix 4

Location of Road Date of Meeting Number of No Section Meeting (District) Participants Concerns Raised by the People construction? He affected his house 100%, he proposed to project to pay for relocated his house is possible. During the first construction nearly two year ago, the authorities proposed to contributed his land for road construction, during this time, 24 May Kamchay he propose suitable price for 5 NR - 13 76 2011 Mear compensation. When this road will started construction? How many meters of ROW for our road NR-13 When this road will started construction? 25 May Don’t excavated land in ROW to 6 NR - 13 Svay Rieng 26 2011 used for road construction, should get from borrow pit far from the road ROW.

118 Appendix 4

Minutes Meeting at Svay Tep District (South)

- Date: Friday, 20/ May, 2011 - Place: District Center - Time: 2h00 to 3h 15

Participants

1-Mr. Penh Pha (Deputy Governor of Svay Tep District) 2- Mr. Romeo Clito( International Resettlement Consultant) 3- Mr. Sao Primarak (MPWT) 4- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) 5- Koung Sary (Chief office of district) 6- Hay Chan Nak (Deputy Chief of Admin of district)

AGENDA

1- Provides the Purpose of project and Project Location along NR 314D and NR13 2- Resettlement Introduction 3- Conduct IOL 3- Conduct SES 5- Time table for field work 6- Cutoff Date 7- Entitlements of Affected people 8- Post-IOL consultation

A- Mr. Sao Primarak (Staff of MPWT)

1. Explain what the TA is all about:

The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 314D from Prosot to the border of Vietnam at Prey Var-Mocva, 25 km; construct a new cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1, between Komchay Mear 65 km; NR53, which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces, we need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved

B- Mr. Seang Bora( Local Resettlement Consultant) 1. Thank the participants for coming and the local officials for facilitating the holding of the meeting today. 2. The members of the survey team will start to measurement tomorrow afternoon from Svay Teap to Kampong Ro District, So I would like to inform you all of authorities to help and inform to all affect people along the road site to participate with our team to conduct IOL and SES to measure size of impact before road construction. As you know the project successful when have participated from authorities and people 3. Why Conduct IOL and SES? because, we want to identify impacts from land acquisition and make an assessment of eligible people and living life of the people along the project site like,

119

Appendix 4

Income and Expense for their each household and find out Vulnerable group like Elderly, Widow, handicap and income under poverty line etc. 4. Cutoff date: We would like to inform to authorities during IOL is the cutoff date by tell to all people by no need to build new houses, Shops stalls in COI. 5. Middle of June 2011 International Resettlement Consultant will come here again to public consultation again C- Deputy of District Referring to ideas for MPWT’s officer and Resettlement Consultant provided all of the information, he would like to inform to all of authorities related to the project site to participate strongly with this actions to get successfully, and he provide this to commune head to repot some of structures and fences etc,

The Commune Head of Prasot Prasot cmmune has 7500m from Prasot commune to Kampong Ro district is not so much affected with structures, affected agriculture only - Affected some Fences and 13 structures and severely affected 3 structures - Affected with 4 villages 1. Tuol Trabaek village: affected with 24 stalls/Shops 2. Pothy Vuong village: affected 5 stalls/shops and 5 fences, 3. Prey Ruodol village: 3 relocated structures and 1 gateway Pagoda 4. Ang Tamouk village: affected with 1 gateway of pagoda

E- Number Commune and Village at Svay Teab District along NR-314

District Commune Village Remarks Prasoutr Ti Muoy Kandieng Reay Prasoutr Ti Pi Svay Teap Angk Ta Mouk Prasout Prey Rumduol Pou Vong

Attendants List

Province: Svay Rieng, District: Svay Tep, Commune: Kandeang Reay, Village:

/ Sign or Thumb No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village Print 1 Romeo Clito M Inter- Consultant KCI 2 Sao Primarak M MPWT 3 Seang Bora M Local Consultant KCI 4 Phenh Pha M Deputy of District Svay Teap 5 Koung Sary M District officer Chief of office 6 Men Saran M District officer Chief of Admin 7 Hay Chan M District officer Deputy Chief of Admin Nak 8 Gnoun Sat F Commune head Kandeang Reay 9 Ouk Pak M Commune head Prasot village 10 Sek Saline M Village head Prey Rumdol village

120 Appendix 4

11 Am San M Village head Tuol Trabaek village 12 Phouk M Village head Prasot Pir village Savaen 13 Mok Savun M Village head Prasot Muy village

Writing by Local Resettlement consultant

Mr. Seang Bora

121

Appendix 4

Minutes Meeting at Kampong Ro District (South)

- Date: Saturday, 21/ May, 2011 - Place: District Center of Kampong Ro - Time: 9h00 Participants

1- Mr. Pich Sovan (Chief Governor of district) 2- Mr. Romeo Clito( International Resettlement Consultant) 3- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) 4- Mr. Sok Sam Ol (Chief Admin of Kampong Ro district)

AGENDA

A- Chief of District Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-314 and Participants during this meeting and transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) and Mr. Romeo B. Clito (International Resettlement Consultant)

B- Mr. Seang Bora( Local Resettlement Consultant)

Thank the participants for coming and the local officials for facilitating the holding of the meeting today. 6. Explain what the TA is all about:

2. The members of the survey team will conducting measurement from Svay Teap to Kampong Ro District, So I would like to inform you all of authorities to help and provide this information to all affect people along the road site to participate with our team to conduct

122 Appendix 4

IOL and SES to measure size of impact before road construction. As you know the project successful when have participated from authorities and people and all APs must be clear what assets, others assets or lands that affected with the project after thumb print or sign agreement with the team survey. The project needed 10m from road existing centerline for each site, total is 20 m. 3. Why Conduct IOL and SES? because, we want to get legible and eligible people and living life of the people along the project site like, Income and Expense for their each household and find out Vulnerable group like Elderly, Widow, handicap and income under poverty line etc. especially, find out that their own assets for each affected household that affected by road construction project. 4. Cutoff date: We would like to inform to authorities during IOL is the cutoff date by tell to all people no need to build new houses, Shops stalls in COI. 7. Middle of June 2011 International Resettlement Consultant will come here again to public consultation again with affected people and authorities along the project site. C- Chief of District Referring to Resettlement Consultant provided all of the information, he would like to inform to all of authorities related to the project site to participate strongly with this actions to get successfully, and he provide to commune head to report some of structures and fences and to find out how many people that affected inside the COI and that assts that all people lose.

Number Commune and Village at Kampong Ro District along NR-314D

District Commune Village 1- Pring Chrum 1 Pras Ponlea 2- Trapeang Lun 3- Tradaet 2 Prey Thom 1- Prey Sakom 1- Trapeang Chhlonh Commercial area (around PK: Kampong Ro 3 Nhor 2- Ro 16+900) 3- Svay Anat 4- Trapeang Treav 4 khsaet 1- Resay Orm Commercial area( around 1- Oh PK:20+600) 5 Thmey 2- Prey Voir 5 11

Attendants List

Province: Svay Rieng, District Kampong Ro, Commune, Village:

No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village 1 Pich Sovan M Chief of District Kampong Ro 2 Romeo Clito M Inter- Consultant KCI 3 Seang Bora M Local Consultant KCI

123

Appendix 4

4 Sok Sam Ol M Chief admin of District Kampong Ro 5 Prach Koung M Commune head Ksaet 6 Real Sear M Village head Nhor 7 Sao Savaen M Village head Thmey 8 Sam Sorn M Village head Nhor 9 Noun Phal M Village head Nhor 10 Phae Sarorn M Village head Pring Chrum 11 Kim Rithy M Commune head Prash Ponlea 12 Hing Pae M Village head Tra Baek 13 Chea Young M Deputy of commune Thmey 14 Rot Soueng F Commune head Prey Thom 15 Some Hang M Commune head Nhor 16 Som Sam At M Village head Oh 17 Sao Samaen M Village head Ay anak 18 Long Sary M Village head Trapeang Run 19 Chan Yong M Village head Resay Orm 20 Nhim Pa M Village head 21 22

Writing by Local Resettlement consultant

Mr. Seang Bora

124 Appendix 4

Minutes Meeting at Rum Duol District (South)

- Date: Saturday, 21/ May, 2011 - Place: District Center of Rum Duol - Time: 2h00 Participants

1- Mr. Chan Heng (Deputy Governor of Rum Duol district) 2- Mr. Romeo Clito( International Resettlement Consultant) 2- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant 3- Communes Chief, Commune Councils and villages head and affected people (APs)

AGENDA

A- Dputy of District Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-13 in Rum Duol District area and Participants during this meeting and transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) and Mr. Romeo B. Clito (International Resettlement Consultant)

B- Mr. Seang Bora( Local Resettlement Consultant)

Thanks you very much for Mr. Romeo B. Clito (International Resettlement Consultant) that has present, Deputy of district, Chief of Communes, Village head and all of the people that participated for this meeting today. 8. Explain what the TA is all about:

125

Appendix 4

2. The members of the survey team will conducting measurement road number 314Dfrom Svay Tep to Kampong Ro District and, will to conducted Rum Duol district around between next week, So I would like to inform you all of authorities to help and provide this information to all affect people along the road site to participate with our team to conduct IOL and SES to measure size of impact before road construction. As you know the project successful when have participated from authorities and people and all APs must be clear what assets, others assets or lands that affected with the project after thumb print or sign agreement with the team survey. The project needed 10m from road existing centerline for each site, total is 20 m. 3. Why Conduct IOL and SES? because, we want to get legible and eligible people and living life of the people along the project site like, Income and Expense for their each household and find out Vulnerable group like Elderly, Widow, handicap and income under poverty line etc. especially, find out that their own assets for each affected household that affected by road construction project. 4. Cutoff date: We would like to inform to authorities during IOL is the cutoff date by tell to all people no need to build new houses, Shops stalls in COI. 5. Middle of June 2011 International Resettlement Consultant will come here again to public consultation again with affected people and authorities along the project site. C- Deputy of District Referring to Resettlement Consultant provided all of the information, he would like to inform to all of authorities related to the project site to participate strongly with this actions to get successfully, and he provide to commune head to report some of structures and fences and to find out how many people that affected inside the COI and that assts that all people lose.

Number Communes and Villages at Rom Duol district along NR -13

District Commune Village 1- Kampong Chork Commercial area(Pk: 7+600) 1- Chork 2- Prey Keav 1- Kok Sramor 2- Ta Naeng 2- Sang Ke 3- Puon 4- Ta chou Rum Duol 1- Trapeang Kros 2- Trapeang Kraet 3- Chrung Popel 3- Prah Ang Keo 4_Kroch 1- Tasork 4- Kampong Ampil 2- Trapeang damrey 4 12

126 Appendix 4

Attendants List

Province: Svay Rieng, District Rum Duol, Commune: Village:

No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village 1 Pich Heng M Village head Chork 2 Chet Chan Thorn M Village head Prey Keav 3 Koeng Ny F Village head Kok Sramor 4 Park Sa Khorn M Village head Tanaeng 5 Ros Seay M Village head Pon 6 Mork Chhorn M Village head Tachou 7 Prum Vath M Village head Trapeang Krous 8 Ma Sarin M Village head Trapeang Kraet 9 Sao Saphon M Village head Kroch 10 Men Bun thoeurn M Village head Prah Ang Keo 11 Keo Reth M Village head Trapeang Damrey 12 Sor Va M Village head Tasork 13 Ou Saval M Commune head Sang Kae 14 Reach Saphon M Commune head Kampong Ampil 15 Souce Pheng M Commune head Chrong Popel 16 Oung Sarorn M People Prey Keav 17 So Navy M People Prey Keav 18 Chen Raem People 19 Chin Phaly M People Prey Keav 20 San Chhorvorn M People Prey Keav 21 Loek Siyat M People Prey Keav 22 Sao Sarorn People Prey Keav 23 En Vanna People Prey Keav 24 Chet Chan Thorn Village head Prey Keav 25 Sear Lakhana People Prey Keav 26 En Phear Village head Svay Roung 27 Keo Boraen People Prey Keav 28 Kim vanna People Prey Keav 29 Kim Boraen People Prey Keav 30 Pov Sinareth People Prey Keav 31 Mey salim People Prey Keav 32 Men Sitha People Prey Keav 33 Em Da People Chork 34 Chea Soklida People Chork 35 Oung Nary People Chork 36 Sim Sithoeurn People Prey Keav

127

Appendix 4

37 Men Sam At People Prey Keav 38 OU Dany People Prey Keav 39 Pheng Sophat People Chork 40 Toch Sinat People Chork 41 Ouk Kunthea People Chork 42 Has Neang People Chork 43 Pen Sam An Commune Council Kampong Chork

Writing by Local Resettlement consultan

Mr. Seang Bora

128 Appendix 4

Minutes Meeting at Romeas Haek District

- Date: Saturday, 22/ May, 2011 - Place: District Center - Time: 9h00 Participants

1- Mr. Hen Sokun (Chief of district Governor) 2- Mr. Romeo Clito( International Resettlement Consultant) 3- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) 4- Pen Savorn (district Officer) 5- Men Samoeurn (district Officer) 6- Commune Chiefs, commune council and all of village head

AGENDA

A- Mr. Hen Sokun (Chief of district Governor) Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-13 from Rum Duol District border to border of Kamchay Mear and Participants during this meeting (see attach files ), and transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) and Mr. Romeo B. Clito (International Resettlement Consultant)

B- Mr. Seang Bora( Local Resettlement Consultant)

129

Appendix 4

need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved after construction.

2. The members of the survey team will conducting measurement road number 314Dfrom Svay Tep to Kampong Ro District and, will to conducted Rum Duol district and after conducted at Romeas Haek district around between next week and also Kamchay Mear district at NR-8, So I would like to inform you all of authorities to help and provide this information to all affect people along the road site to participate with our team to conduct IOL and SES to measure size of impact before road construction. As you know the project successful when have participated from authorities and people and all APs must be clear what assets, others assets or lands that affected with the project after thumb print or sign agreement with the team survey. The project needed 10m from road existing centerline for each site, total is 20 m.

3. Why Conduct IOL and SES? because, we want to get legible and eligible people and living life of the people along the project site like, Income and Expense for their each household and find out Vulnerable group like Elderly, Widow, handicap and income under poverty line etc. especially, find out that their own assets for each affected household that affected by road construction project. 4. Cutoff date: We would like to inform to authorities during IOL is the cutoff date by tell to all people no need to build new houses, Shops stalls in COI. 5. Middle of June 2011 International Resettlement Consultant will come here again to public consultation again with affected people and authorities along the project site. C- Deputy of District Referring to Resettlement Consultant provided all of the information, he would like to inform to all of authorities related to the project site to participate strongly with this actions to get successfully, and he provide to commune head to report some of structures and fences and to find out how many people that affected inside the COI and that assts that all people lose.

Number Commune and Village at Romeas Haek District along NR_13

District Commune Village Others 1- Samroung Commercial area 1- Angpra Sre 2- Trapeang Rumdenh 3- Thnal Peam 1- Bos Koki 2- Trapeang Thbal 2- Andong Po 3- Trapeang Chor 4- Trapeang Banteay Commercial area Romeas Haek 5- Arak Svay 1- Chong Oh 3- kampong Trach 2- Ta Trav 3- Kampong Trach Commercial area 1- Touek Vil 4- Amkpil 2- Trapeang Prey 3- Ta Mao

130 Appendix 4

District Commune Village Others 4- Trapeang Popel 5- Ampil 6- Troak 1- Mony Proeksa 5- Trorse 2- Voat 1- Trapeang Smach 6- Andong Trabaek 2- Andong Trabaek 6 Communes 21Villages

Attendants List

Province: Svay Rieng, District Romeas_Haek, Commune: , Village:

/ No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village 1 Hen Sokun M Deputy Chief of District Romeas Haek 2 Romeo Clito M Inter- Consultant KCI 3 Seang Bora M Local Consultant KCI 4 Pov Savonng M Commune head Trorse 5 Pov Seap M Village head Andong Po 6 Koung Vaet M Commune Council 2 Andong Trabaek 7 Koung Sok M Commune Council 2 Ampil 8 Soeng Sarorn F Commune Council Ampil 9 Prach Yim M Village head Trorse 10 Mom Sorn M Commune head Andong Po 11 Ros Phan M Village head Arak Svay 12 Keo Rim M Village head Trapeang Rum Denh 13 Ouk Van M Commune head Ang Prasre 14 Tep Chan Savuth M Village head Ang Prasre 15 Chan Samoeurn M Village head Ang Prasre 16 Chan Saban M Village head Ang Prasre 17 Moek Moung M Village head Vat 18 Pen Oeurn M Village head Trapeang Smach 19 Korng Bunthoeurn M Village head Andong Trabaek 20 Pen Savorn M District Officer Romeas Haek 21 Men Samoeurn M District Officer Romeas Haek 22

Writing by Local Resettlement consultant

Mr. Seang Bora

131

Appendix 4

Minutes Meeting at Kamchay Mear District

- Date: Saturday, 24/ May, 2011 - Place: Veal Smach Village - Time: 2h00 Participants

1- Mr. Yaeng Cham (Commune council of Krabao) 2- Mr. Yat Yorn( district Public Works and Transport) 3- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) 4- Commune councils , village heads and Affected people (APs)

AGENDA

A- Chief of district Public Work and Transport Had confirm to all participants about the purpose of meeting and after that Commune head had Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-13 in Kamchay Mear District from border of Romeas Haek to NR 08 affected with one commune and two villages: namely, Kra Bao Commune, 1, Thbong Vat Village, 2, Veal Smarch Thmey Village, to Participants during this meeting and transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)

B- Mr. Seang Bora( Local Resettlement Consultant)

First, I would like to say thanks you very much for Chief of district Public Work and Transport , Commune head that has present that had arrange meeting today, thanks for all village head Village head and all of the people that participated for this meeting today.

10. Explain what the TA is all about:

132 Appendix 4

need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved after construction.

2. The members of the survey team will conducting measurement road number 314Dfrom Svay Tep to Kampong Ro District and, will to conducted Rum Duol district , Romeas Haek and will arrived Kamchay Mear District around next week, So I would like to inform you all of authorities and people along the road side to help and provide this information to all others affect people to participate with our team to conduct IOL and SES to measure size of impact after road construction. As you know the project successful when have participated from authorities and people and all APs should be understand the purpose of the project. The project needed 10m from centerline of existing road for each site, total is 20 m. so, all of properties/ assets/lands/ trees and other assets will collected during team survey conduct OL and SES

3. Why Conduct IOL and SES? because, we want to find out legible and eligible people and living life of the people along the project site like, Income and Expense for their each household and find out Vulnerable group like Elderly, Widow, handicap and income under poverty line etc. especially, find out that their own assets for each affected household that affected by road construction project.

4. Cutoff date: We would like to inform to authorities and participants and others affected people along the road side during IOL and SES is the days for cutoff date by tell to all people no need to build new houses, Shops stalls and others structures in COI. 5. Middle of June 2011 International Resettlement Consultant will come here again to conduct the public consultation meeting again with affected people and authorities along the project site.

C- Chief of commune Referring to Resettlement Consultant provided all of the information, he would like to inform to all of authorities related to the project site especially, Village head to participate strongly with this actions to get successfully, and he provide to village head to report some of structures and fences and to find out how many people that affected inside the COI and assts that all people loss.

Number Commune and Villages at Kamchay Mear District along NR-13

District Commune Village Others 1- Thbong Vat 1- Kra Bao Svay Rieng 2- Veal Smach Thmey 1- Communes 2 Villages

133

Appendix 4

Attendants List

Province: Svay Rieng, District: Kamchay Mear, Commune: Village:

/ No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village 1 Romeo Clito M Inter- Consultant KCI 3 Seang Bora M Local Consultant KCI 4 Yat Yorn M Public Work of District Kamchay Mear 5 Yaeng Cham M Commune Council Kra Bao 6 Sao Sonay M Commune Council Kra Bao 7 Teap Run M Village head Veal Smach 8 Heng SamOn F Village head Thbong Vat 9

Note:76 people participated during that meeting (see Pictures attachment)

Writing by Local Resettlement consultant

Mr. Seang Bora

134 Appendix 4

Minutes Meeting at Kamchay Mear District

- Date: Saturday, 25/ May, 2011 - Place: Baek Ronose Village (along NR-13) - Time: 9h00 AM Participants

1- Mr. Chhiv Sarorn (Deputy Municipal of Svay Rieng) 2- Mr. Choup Chanrithy (Community Development Town) 3- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) 4- Mr. Sin Yong (Chief ofCommune of Sangkhor)

AGENDA

A- Deputy Mulniciple of Svay Rieng Town He had confirm to all participants about the purpose of meeting and after that Commune head had report name of District, Communes and village along NR-13 in Svay Rieng District from NR- 1 to border of Rum Duol district affected with one commune and 6 villages: namely, Sang Khor Commune, 1, Thmey Village, 2, Baek Ronorse Village, 3, Thlork, 4 Preah Tonle, 5 Po Phlear, 6 Aknakot village to Participants during this meeting and transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)

B- Mr. Seang Bora( Local Resettlement Consultant)

First, I would like to say thanks you very much for Deputy Mulniciple of Svay Rieng Town, Public Work and Transport , Commune head that has present and arranged meeting today, thanks for all village head Village head and all of lady and gentlemen that have participated for this meeting today. I would like to introduce purpose of meeting as follow:

11. Explain what the TA is all about:

135

Appendix 4

between Komchay Mear 65 km; NR53, which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces, we need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved after construction.

2. Why Conduct IOL and SES? Because, we want to find out legible and eligible people and living life of the people along the project site like, Income and Expense for their each household and find out Vulnerable group like Elderly, Widow, handicap and income under poverty line etc. especially, find out that their own assets for each affected household that affected by road construction project.

3. Cutoff date: We would like to inform to authorities and participants and others affected people along the road side during IOL and SES is the days for cutoff date by tell to all people no need to build new houses, Shops stalls and others structures in COI.

4. The members of the survey team will conducting measurement road number 314Dfrom Svay Tep to Kampong Ro District and, will to conducted Rum Duol district , Romeas Haek and will arrived Kamchay Mear District around next week, So I would like to inform you all of authorities and people along the road side to help and provide this information to all others affect people to participate with our team to conduct IOL and SES to measure size of impact after road construction. As you know the project successful when have participated from authorities and people and all APs should be understand the purpose of the project. The project needed 10m from centerline of existing road for each site, total is 20 m. so, all of properties, assets, lands, trees and other assets will collected during team survey conduct IOL and SES

5. Middle of June 2011 International Resettlement Consultant will come here again to conduct the public consultation meeting again with affected people and authorities along the project site.

C- Deputy Mulniciple of Svay Rieng Town

Referring to Resettlement Consultant provided all of the information, he would like to inform to all of authorities related to the project site especially, Village head to participate strongly with this actions to get successfully, and he provide to village head to report some of structures and fences and to find out how many people that affected inside the COI and assts that all people loss. And don’t be have more structures like : Shops, Stalls, Houses or other structures build in COI or ROW from to date, if have some build temporary structures should have agreement from authorities and agreement between owners of structures and authorities, when Government need land in ROW, they will moved out by no compensation.

136 Appendix 4

6- Number Commune and Village at Svay Rieng District along NR_13

District Commune Village Others 1- Thmey 2- Bak Ronorse 3- Thlork Svay Rieng 1- Sangkhor 4- Preah Tonle 5- Po Phlear 6- Akna Kot 1- Communes 6 Villages

7- Attendants List

Organization/Villag No. Name Sex Position e 1 Chhiv Sarorn M Deputy Municipal of Svay Rieng Svay Rieng Town 2 Romeo Clito M Inter- Consultant KCI 3 Seang Bora M Local Consultant KCI 4 Souce Sear M Village head Bak Ronorse 5 Pal Saban M Village head Po Phlear 6 Sam Samet M Thlork 7 Ros Hun M Staff of village Bak Ronorse 8 Tith Salei F Deputy of village Po Phlear 9 Nem Savoeurn F Staff of village Po Phlear 10 Kim Sina F Staff of village Aknakot 11 Em Kroch M Deputy of village Aknakot 12 Pen Malida F Deputy of village Thlork 13 Sao Han M Village head Aknakot 14 Phouk Cheat M Village head Preah Tonle 15 Meas Horn M Commune Council Sang Khor 16 Torn Samon M Deputy of village Bak Ronorse 17 Sin Yong M Chief of Commune Sang Khor 18 Sok Norn M Deputy Chief of Commune Sang Khor 19 Sorn Sam At M Village head Thmey 20 Choup Chanrithy M Community Development Town Svay Rieng 21 M 22

Writing by Local Resettlement consultant Mr. Seang Bora

137

Appendix 5

Summary of Post-IOL Survey Consultations Held (South)

Discuss the result of IOL( how many losing entire houses, entire shops and public facilities such as electric and communication poles need to be relocated Discuss Resettlement policy in general terms (affected houses and other structures will be compensated at replacement cost find out from the affected people their suggestions and preferences regarding compensation, allowances and assistance, relocation of structures Re-inform the cutoff date

Location of Road Date of Number of No Meeting Main Points Raised by the People Section Meeting Participants (District) He has two place of Residential land along road NR-314D but, he participated to measured only one place, how should he do? Proposed to constructed drainage Mon, 20 June 1 NR 314D Svay Tep along the during road 2011 construction. When will project stared compensation? For example: If landless where people should live? Proposed to constructed drainage along the during road construction Project construct road in district 50% people to proposed to Mon, 20 June Kampong constructed 50% more road to 2 NR 314D 2011 Ro improve the town in district if possible. Compensation rate, how much per quare meter?

If affected fences or stalls, will the project pay for compensation or Tu, 21 June 3 NR 13 Svay Rieng not? 2011 If affected public assets, how should they pay compensation? If People that landless, where should they can live and how to do? Mrs. Loek Nary, she did not complain with project if government need. Mr. Prum Savan, Survey team Tu, 21 June 4 NR 13 Rom Duol measure for his residential land 2011 and structure, but, he did not measured his farm land along the road site Mrs.Pum Phanna, During measurement survey she did not stay at home, hoe should she do? Mr. Ros Mara, the project need

138 Appendix 5

Location of Road Date of Number of No Meeting Main Points Raised by the People Section Meeting Participants (District) 10m each side total 20m, do the project need some more land or not? Proposed to minimize COI around 7 to 8m each side for urban area?

Mr. Pich Saran, Culvert for waste water in samroung Urban area is money collected from local people, if road constructed Wed, 22 June Romeas 5 NR 13 affected with their culvert, 2011 Haek collected money from local people again or responsible by road project?

Don’t excavated land in ROW like canal, to used for road construction, should get from borrow pit far from the road ROW. Mr. Heng Sam On, Proposed project to study to be suitable Wed, 22 June Kamchay 6 NR 13 71 compensation rate. 2011 Mear Propose contractor vehicle slow down their speed and proposed spray water at least two time aday. How much the ROW of the roas number 13?

Compensation rate, how much per quare meter? If affected Concrete Grave, how the project compensation for this Grave? Don’t excavated land in ROW like canal, to used for road construction, should get from borrow pit far from the road ROW. Thu, 23 June Kampong The project need 10m each side 7 NR 150B 2011 Tralach total 20m, do the project need some more land or not? How the project compensation for all properties that affected by project base on currently market value? If people that affected 100% of their land affected, where should their live?

Road construction need only 10 Thu, 23 June Samki each site for road construction or 8 NR 150B 2011 Meanchey need more top soil? How the project compensation for

139

Appendix 5

Location of Road Date of Number of No Meeting Main Points Raised by the People Section Meeting Participants (District) all properties that affected by project base on currently market value? If affected fences or stalls, will the project pay for compensation or not?

If affected fences or stalls, will the project pay for compensation or not? Road construction need only 10 each site for road construction or need more for top soil? Provincial Road Improvement NR 150B Fri, 24 June 9 Tuok Phos Project is a project that important and 53 2011 to develop rural area all people very happy with this project and proposed to start constructed as soon as possible they did not build any more structures from now, and thanks for Government of Cambodia that have this project.

NR 53 and Fri, 24 June N/A 10 Thpong 151B 2011

140 Appendix 5

Minutes Meeting at Svay Teap District

- Date: Monday, 20/ June, 2011 - Place: Prasot Commune - Time: 8h00 Participants 1- Mr. Penh Pha (Deputy Chief of Svay Tep District) 2- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT 3- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) 4- Commune Chiefs, 5- Village headman

AGENDA

Introduce purpose of the Post- IOL consultation meeting Discuss the result of IOL( how many losing entire houses, entire shops and public facilities such aselectric and communication poles need to be relocate, Residential Land, Commercial Land, Farm land Discuss Resettlement policy in general term (affected houses and other structures will be compensatedat replacement cost at currently market value find out from the affected people, Vulnerable people, Severity people and their suggestions andpreferences regarding compensation, allowances and assistance, relocation of structures, grievance redress and participation Re-inform Cutoff date to authorities and APs don’t be build structures in COI after cutoff date grievance redress and participation Minimize impact of the project

A- Mr. Penh Pha (Deputy Chief of Svay Tep District)

Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-314D in Kampong Ro District from Svay Tep district to Prey Vao Vietname border and Participants during this meeting (see attach files ), and transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT) and Local Resettlement Consultant.

B- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT)

Thanks you very much for Deputy of district, Commune Chiefs, Village headman and all of affected people that has present here today. Referring to population and Transportation were increased from day to day, The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 314D from Prosot to the border of Vietnam at Prey Var-Mocva, 26,5 km; construct a new cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1, between Komchay Mear 65 km; NR150B, 53 and 151B which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces, we need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved after construction. The Pre IOL was conducted, Now, Post IOL are inform the meeting to understanding the result of Inventory loss, But the result

141

Appendix 5

will introduce by Local Resettlement Consultant.

C- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)

Thanks you again for Deputy Chief of district, Commune Chiefs, Village headman and all of affected people that has present here today. We was first meeting with authorities, not participated with APs in May 2011 for proposed authorities to inform to all APs know information about survey team to measured, interview APs along the NR 314D.

Now, this is second meeting that have authorities and affected people to participate to understand the first result during conducted IOL. As you know Survey team was conducted measured, Interviewed IOL and SES with affected people that affected in the COI ten meters each side, the total length around 26,5 Km, the total affected people are 288households, Interview with men are 159 households, interview with women are 56 households and did not meet owners are 73 households. In 288 households affected residential land 14300m2, Commercial land is 1632.2m2; agricultural land is 12004m2, Widow 23 households, poor 40 household, disable 01. Affected Electric and communication post 135(Concrete 57 Steel 03 and Wood 75), affected 36 houses, Partial houses 18 and entire houses 18, Divorced 01 household, Widow 23, Poor 40 and Disable 01. Affected people total 288 household are legible APs that project affected people for NR 314D, So all of properties affected by project will compensate base on replacement cost result at currently market value after replacement cost study completed and send to IRC/MEF, when IRC/ MEF approved and for vulnerable group like Widow, Elderly, handicap, displace people and people income under national poverty line will haveassistance out of properties affected by project.

Cutoff date: The project was limited the date of IOL is cutoff date that mead by no more structures builds in the COI.

The projects still have option to minimize impact, should be keep the same COI or decrease COI for urban area depending on detail design of road engineering.

Grievance redress and participation: The grievance redress process includes four stages. There are three stages before complaints may be elevated to a court of law as a last resort.

(i) First stage: APs will present their complaints andgrievances verbally or in writing to the CLAC. The CLAC will be obliged to provide immediate written confirmation of receiving the complaint. If after 15 days the aggrieved AP does not hear from the CLAC, or if the AP is not satisfied with the decision taken in the first stage, the complaint may be brought to the District Office. (ii) Second stage: The District Office has 15days within which to resolve the complaint to the satisfaction of all concerned. If the complaint cannot be solved at this stage, the District Office will bring the case to the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee. (iii) Third stage: The Provincial GrievanceRedress Committee meets with the aggrieved party and tries to resolve the situation. The Committee may ask for a

142 Appendix 5

review of the DMS by the external monitor (EMO). Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Committee must make a written decision and submit copies to the MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP. (iv) Final stage: If the aggrievedAP does not hear from the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee or is not satisfied, he/she will bring the case to Provincial Court. This is the final stage for adjudicating complaints. Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Court must make a written decision and submit copies to the MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP. If any party is still unsatisfied with the Provincial Court judgment, he/she can bring the case to a higher-level court.

Writing by Local Resettlement consultant

Mr. Seang Bora

Attendants List

Province: Svay Rieng, District, Svay Tep,

No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village 1 Penh Pha M Deputy Chief of district Svay Tep 2 Try Yorn M Resettlement Unit MPWT 3 Seang Bora M Local Consultant KCI 4 Sin Somaly M Seller Brosot I 5 Long Theun M Seller Brosot I 6 So SiThuon M Seller Brosot I 7 Hun Savat M Seller Pothivong 8 Hun Song F People Pothivong 9 Yous Samith M People Pothivong 10 Sao Sameun F People Pothivong 11 Chim Thany F People Pothivong 12 Sao sokhom M People Pothivong 13 Sao Chantha M People Pothivong 14 Koy Vat M People Pothivong 15 Put Chea M People Pothivong 16 Lek Sin F People Pothivong 17 Yak Ral M People Pothivong 18 Not Socheat M People BrosotI 19 Srey Som auon M People BrosotI 20 Un Sok F People BrosotI 21 To Vei F People Brosot I 22 To Leng M People Brosot I 23 Suos Hong M People Brosot I 24 Meas Chea M People Brosot II

143

Appendix 5

25 Kong Somaean M People Brosot II 26 Put Nouv F People Brosot II 27 Preap Tith M People BrosotII 28 Prom Saroeun F People Pothivong 29 On Somalay M Teacher Pothivong 30 Mey Saran F People Pothivong 31 Choeuk Phan F People Pothivong 32 Ruos Sina F People Brosot 33 Ruos Sombath F People Brosot 34 Chea Somnang M People Brosot 35 Preap Chantha M People Brosot 36 Prom Nouy F People Tuol trobek 37 Te kieng F People Brosot 38 Va Chom M People BrosotI 39 Khiev Bopha M People BrosotI 40 To Raty M People BrosotI 41 Mao Sarith F People Brosot 42 Kao Sokha F People Brosot 43 Mao Sophy F People Tuol trobek 44 Som Savin M Seller BrosotI 45 Pok Saroeun F Seller Tuoltrobek 46 Long Chan M Seller Prey Roduol 47 Som Phaly M People Tuoltrobek 48 Nhim Boran M People Tuoltrobek 49 Suos Sarong M People Tuoltrobek 50 Prak Sovanara M People Tuoltrobek 51 Net Chantha F People Tuoltrobek 52 Va Nget F People Tuoltrobek 53 Thong Sakun F People Tuoltrobek 54 Nuon Pok M People Tuoltrobek 55 Net Sarith F People Tuoltrobek 56 Prom Somaol F People Tuoltrobek 57 Hel Choeun F People Tuoltrobek 58 Min San F People Tuoltrobek 59 Hok Yon F People Tuoltrobek 60 Duong Chinh M People Tuol trobek 61 Um Saron M People Tuoltrobek 62 Prak Sakhon M People Tuoltrobek

144 Appendix 5

63 Prom Phan M People Tuoltrobek 64 Nhanh Sonoeun M People Pothivong 65 Po Leat M People Pothivong 66 El Ry F People Pothivong 67 Nhem Ravy M People Pothivong 68 Uk Somnang M People BrosotI 69 Prak Sombat F People Tuoltrobek 70 Meas Somaly F People Brosot I 71 Ben Yin M People Tuoltrobek 72 Prak Sitha F People Brosot II 73 Suos Sokha M People Tuoltrobek 74 Ruos Sakun M People Brosot II 75 Sok Chany M People BrosotII 76 Chea Somnang M People Brosot 77 Phat Sochea M People Brosot 78 Cheng Vannak M People Prey Roduol 79 Koy Sarin M People Brosot II 80 Val Leng M Soldier Brosot II 81 Sok Vanna M Soldier Brosot I

Participants 81, Female 30

145

Appendix 5

Minutes Meeting at Kampong Ro District

- Date: Monday, 20/ June, 2011 - Place: Pagoda Ro - Time: 2h00 Participants 1- Souce Samreth (Deputy of District) 2- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT 3- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) 4- Saom Hang Commune head 5- Kat Kim Village head 6- Sao Samen Village head 7- Sam Sorn Village head

AGENDA

A- Mr. Souce Samreth (Deputy of District)

Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-314D in Svay Tep District from NR-1 to Kampong Ro district’s border and Participants during this meeting (see attach files ), and transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT) and Local Resettlement Consultant to presentation the primary result of IOL and SES,

B- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT)

146 Appendix 5

ADB for approved after construction. The Pre IOL was conducted, Now, Post IOL are inform the meeting to understanding the result of Inventory loss, But the result will introduce by Local Resettlement Consultant.

C- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)

Thanks you again for Deputy Chief of district, Commune Chiefs, Village headman and all of affected people that has present here today. First, I would like to inform the meeting that, We had first meeting with authorities, not participated with APs in May 2011 for proposed authorities to inform to all APs know information about survey team to measured, interview APs along the NR 314D.

Now, this is second meeting that have authorities and affected people to participate to understand the first result during conducted IOL. As you know Survey team was conducted measured, Interviewed IOL and SES with affected people that affected in the COI ten meters each side, the total affected people along road number 314D that have distance around 26,5 Km are affected 288households, Interview with men are 159 households, interview with women are 56 households and did not meet owners are 73 households. In 288 households affected residential land 14300m2, Commercial land is 1632.2m2; agricultural land is 12004m2, Widow 23 households, poor 40 household, disable 01. Affected Electric and communication post 135(Concrete 57 Steel 03 and Wood 75), affected 36 houses, Partial houses 18 and entire houses 18. Affected people total 288 household are legible APs that project affected people for NR 314D, So all of properties affected by project will compensate base on replacement cost result at currently market value after replacement cost study completed and send to IRC/MEF, when IRC/ MEF approved and for vulnerable group like Widow, Elderly, handicap, displace people and people income under national poverty line will haveassistance out of properties affected by project.

Cutoff date: The project was limited the date of IOL is cutoff date that mead by no more structures builds in the COI.

The projects still have option to minimize impact, should be keep the same COI or decrease COI for urban area depending on detail design of road engineering.

Grievance redress and participation: The grievance redress process includes four stages. There are three stages before complaints may be elevated to a court of law as a last resort.

(v) First stage: APs will present their complaints andgrievances verbally or in writing to the CLAC. The CLAC will be obliged to provide immediate written confirmation of receiving the complaint. If after 15 days the aggrieved AP does not hear from the CLAC, or if the AP is not satisfied with the decision taken in the first stage, the complaint may be brought to the District Office. (vi) Second stage: The District Office has 15days within which to resolve the complaint to the satisfaction of all concerned. If the complaint cannot be solved at this stage, the District Office will bring the case to the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee.

147

Appendix 5

(vii) Third stage: The Provincial GrievanceRedress Committee meets with the aggrieved party and tries to resolve the situation. The Committee may ask for a review of the DMS by the external monitor (EMO). Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Committee must make a written decision and submit copies to the MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP. (viii) Final stage: If the aggrievedAP does not hear from the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee or is not satisfied, he/she will bring the case to Provincial Court. This is the final stage for adjudicating complaints. Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Court must make a written decision and submit copies to the MOWRAM, PDWRAM, PDRD, EMO, PRS/IRC and the AP. If any party is still unsatisfied with the Provincial Court judgment, he/she can bring the case to a higher-level court.

Attendants List

No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village 1 Souce Samreth M Deputy of District Kampong Ro 2 Try Yorn M Resettlement Unit MPWT 3 Seang Bora M Local Consultant KCI 4 Sam Sorn M Village headman Trapeang Trave 5 Chin Em M People Trapeang Trave 6 Seth Koeng M People Trapeang Trave 7 Chhuon Sakoun M People Trapeang Trave 8 Bive Sinath F People Trapeang Trave 9 Loeng Sitha F People Trapeang Trave 10 Boek Saroeurn F People Trapeang Trave 11 Kok Him F People Trapeang Trave 12 Hemh Sam Phorse F People Trapeang Trave 13 Kiv Many F People Trapeang Trave 14 Heng Sam On F People Trapeang Trave 15 Chuon Vanna M People Trapeang Trave 16 Gnuoy Chanda M People Trapeang Trave 17 Long Vuthy M People Trapeang Trave 18 Put Eng M People Trapeang Trave 19 Khmao Sareth M People Trapeang Trave 20 Keo Phearum M People Trapeang Trave 21 Chhan Thim M People Trapeang Trave 22 Ngin Khemra M People Trapeang Trave 23 Ouk Kory M People Trapeang Trave 24 Pol Rorn M People Svay Anath 25 Duch Try M People Svay Anath 26 Sok Ouk M People Svay Anath 27 Sar Tith M People Svay Anath 28 Suo Phorse M People Ro

148 Appendix 5

29 Pin Ty F People Ro 30 Seang Sina F People Ro 31 Khat Pheach F People Svay Anath 32 Chab Hean M People Svay Anath 33 Neang Peak M People Svay Anath 34 Sao Samen M Deputy ofvillage Svay Anath 35 Sek Nhim M Deputy ofvillage Ro 36 Sar Phal M People Svay Anath 37 Chan Sokha F People Trapeang Trave 38 Pok Chanda F People Ro 39 Chea Mavany F People Svay Anath 40 Ke Samon F People Svay Anath 41 Sam Sporn M Village head Trapeang Trav

Total participants are 41person, female 12person

Writing by Local Resettlement consultant

Mr. Seang Bora

149

Appendix 5

Minutes Meeting for post-IOL at Svay Rieng District-NR-13

- Date: Monday, 21/ June, 2011 - Place: Preah Ponlea Village - Time: 8h00 Participants

1- Chhive Saroen (Deputy Municipal of Svay Rieng Town) 2- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT 3- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) 4- Sin Yong (Commune Chief) 5- Kat Kim Village head 6- a Lady commune council 7- All of 6 Villages head

AGENDA

A- Municipal of Svay Rieng Town (Mr. Chhiv Saroen)

Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-13 from National road 1 to border of Rumduol district have 6 villages. and Participants during this meeting (see attach files ), and after that Municipal transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT) and Local Resettlement Consultant to explain the result as following:

B- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT)

Thanks you very much for present of Deputy Municipal of Svay Rieng Town, Commune Chiefs, Village headman and all of affected people that has present here today. Referring to population and Transportation were increased from day to day, The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 13 from NR-1 to NR-8, 65 km; construct a new cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1, between

150 Appendix 5

Komchay Mear NR150B, 53 and 151B which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces, we need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved after construction. The Pre-IOL was conducted in May 2011, Now, Post-IOL are inform the meeting to understanding the result of Inventory loss, But the result will introduce by Local Resettlement Consultant

C- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)

Again, I would like to say thanks you very much for Deputy of Municipal of Svay Rieng Town, Commune Chiefs, Village headman and all of affected people that has present here today. We was first meeting with authorities in May 2011, by not participated with for proposed authorities to inform to all APs know information about survey team to measured, interview APs along the NR 13 for conducted Inventory of Loss.

Now, this is second meeting that have authorities and affected people participate to understand the Primary data result during conducted IOL. During conducted pre-IOL, the team were study along NR-13 there are 4 districts, 11 communes and 39 villages and Survey team was conducted measured, Interviewed IOL and SES with affected people that affected in the COI ten meters each side fro centerline, the total affected people around 65Km is 676 households, Interview with men are 381 households, interview with women are 101 households and did not meet owners are 472households. In 676 households affected residential land 1690.1m2, Commercial land is 1026.9m2; agricultural land is 44681.3m2, electric post 42 and telephone post and affected 45 houses, Partial houses 25 and entire houses 20. Shops/Stalls 62, Partial 17 and entire 45. Affected people total 676 household are legible APs that project affected people for NR 13, So all of properties affected by project will compensate base on replacement cost result at currently market value after approved rate from IRC at MEF and for vulnerable group like Widow, Elderly, handicap, displace people and people income under national poverty line will haveassistance out of properties affected by project. Except Sangkhor commune were conducted with 85 households, Male 41 households, Female 16 households and did not meet owner 28 households that affected Farm land12420m2, Residential land 429m2 and commercial land is 48m2, the total is 12594m2.

Cutoff date: The project was limited the date of IOL is cutoff date that mead by no more structures builds in the COI.

The projects still have option to minimize impact, should be keep the same COI or decrease COI for urban area depending on detail design of road engineering.

Grievance redress and participation: The grievance redress process includes four stages. There are three stages before complaints may be elevated to a court of law as a last resort.

(ix) First stage: APs will present their complaints andgrievances verbally or in writing to the CLAC. The CLAC will be obliged to provide immediate written confirmation of receiving the complaint. If after 15 days the aggrieved AP does not hear from

151

Appendix 5

the CLAC, or if the AP is not satisfied with the decision taken in the first stage, the complaint may be brought to the District Office. (x) Second stage: The District Office has 15days within which to resolve the complaint to the satisfaction of all concerned. If the complaint cannot be solved at this stage, the District Office will bring the case to the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee. (xi) Third stage: The Provincial GrievanceRedress Committee meets with the aggrieved party and tries to resolve the situation. The Committee may ask for a review of the DMS by the external monitor (EMO). Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Committee must make a written decision and submit copies to the MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP. (xii) Final stage: If the aggrievedAP does not hear from the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee or is not satisfied, he/she will bring the case to Provincial Court. This is the final stage for adjudicating complaints. Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Court must make a written decision and submit copies to the MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP. If any party is still unsatisfied with the Provincial Court judgment, he/she can bring the case to a higher-level court.

Attendants List

Province: Svay Rieng Town

No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village 1 Souce Samreth M Deputy Municipal of Svay Svay Rieng Rieng town 2 Try Yorn M Resettlement Unit MPWT 3 Seang Bora M Local Consultant KCI 4 Phae Oul M People 5 Sao Han M Village headman Aknakot 6 Pal Saban M Village headman Poplea 7 Souce Sear M Village headman Bak Roneas 8 Phouk Cheat M Village headman Prash Tole 9 Srey Eam M People Prash Tole 10 Manh Lun F People Prash Tole 11 Roth Sokhon F People Aknakot 12 So Keayou F People Aknakot 13 Phoeuk Savun F People Aknakot 14 Roth Sanen F People Aknakot 15 So Phear F People Aknakot 16 So Phy M People Aknakot 17 Seng Phalla F People Aknakot 18 Mao Ra F People Aknakot 19 Yang Sok M People Aknakot 20 Prum Yong F People Aknakot 21 Moeurn Son F People Aknakot 22 Sok sophy F People Aknakot 23 Chan Sinath M People Aknakot

152 Appendix 5

24 Phay Sophat M People Aknakot 25 Nou Sophorn M People Aknakot 26 Mom Von M People Aknakot 27 Kao Thy M People Poplea 28 Im Samoeurn M People Aknakot 29 Sok Sat M People Aknakot 30 Nhim Sitha M People Aknakot 31 Chan Sath M People Aknakot 32 Chea Vanna M People Aknakot 33 Tep Thach F People Aknakot 34 Pov Saran F People Aknakot 35 Ra Yan F People Aknakot 36 Som Chanda F People Aknakot 37 Yim Ponry F People Aknakot 38 Chork Chhorn F People Aknakot 39 Chan Sopheap F People Aknakot 40 Pich Sithan F People Aknakot 41 Pich Savorn F People Aknakot 42 Yim Koung Kear F People Aknakot 43 En Sinath F People Aknakot 44 Kem Ray F People Aknakot 45 Mao Sareth F People Aknakot 46 Khuon Yan F People Aknakot 47 Roth Savan F People Aknakot 48 Roth Vantha F People Aknakot 49 Roth Vanthorn F People Aknakot 50 Kim Srey Lak F People Aknakot 51 Top Naroth F People Aknakot 52 Kim Ath F People Aknakot 53 Sar Saphan M People Thlok Viilage 54 Sek Sa Em M People Thlok Viilage 55 Meas Buntha M People Prash Tole 56 Phouk Pilot M People Prash Tole 57 Keo Chetna M People Prash Tole 58 Morn Vanara M People Thlok Viilage 59 Nhean Dara M People Thlok Viilage 60 Som Chanthy M People Baroneas 61 Prak Kalan M People Thlok Viilage

153

Appendix 5

62 Neang Sun F People Prash Tole 63 Nhek Phy M People Aknakot 64 Tith Phang M People Aknakot

65 Srey On M People Aknakot 66 Phay Sophat M People Aknakot 67 PovVichet M People Aknakot 68 Chab Phala M People Aknakot 69 Hem Vibol M People Aknakot 70 Ham Sok M People Aknakot 71 Sam Chorn M People Aknakot 72 Sok Saketh F People Prash Tole 73 Po Chhoy M People Prash Tole 74 Pork Saruon F People Prash Tole 75 Sok Sun F People Prash Tole 76 Kaen Puth M People Prash Tole 77 Saom Phon M People Prash Tole 78 Saom Buny M People Prash Tole 79 Yush Proeurn M People Prash Tole 80 Khut Horn F People Prash Tole 81 Mom Phalla F People Prash Tole 82 Meas Lath F People Prash Tole 83 Saom Sokhara F People Prash Tole 84 Kheo Vaney M People Prash Tole 85 Hong Pov M People Prash Tole 86 Orn Manphath F People Prash Tole 87 Orn Manna F People Prash Tole 88 Pe Hun M People Prash Tole 89 Oung Buunthoeurn F People Prash Tole 90 KoungChanty F People Prash Tole 91 Pen Sambath M People Thlok Viilage 92 Pen Sitho F People Thlok Viilage 93 Ouk Chan thy F People Thlok Viilage 94 RathSao M People Thlok Viilage 95 Pok Naran F People Thlok Viilage 96 Souce Somala F People Thlok Viilage 97 Chan Sem F People Thlok Viilage 98 MeasSeang M People Thlok Viilage 99 Kao Sam OL M People Prash Tole

154 Appendix 5

100 Meas Phorn F People Thlok Viilage 101 Nhon Sakhoeurn M People Thlok Viilage 102 Tang Sopheap M People Thlok Viilage 103 Pen Sokha M People Thlok Viilage 104 Min Phalla F People Thlok Viilage 105 Yin Kimhan M People Thlok Viilage 106 Heng Song F People Thlok Viilage 107 Som Sambath F People Thlok Viilage 108 Mom Koy M People Aknakot 109 Ros Han F People Aknakot 110 Chhun Saran M People Poplea 111 Som Soum M People Poplea 112 Lay Lun M People Poplea 113 Tep Tharachan F People Poplea 114 Tep Neang M People Poplea 115 Kim Lay M People Poplea 116 Tith Saley M People Poplea 117 Heang Sam Oeurn M People Poplea 118 Ham Soda M People Thlok Viilage 119 Heng Puth F People Thlok Viilage 120 Kaeng Phal M People Thlok Viilage 121 Ham Soy M People Thlok Viilage 122 Khuon Narin M People Thlok Viilage 123 Reach Sovanna F People Thlok Viilage 124 Tith Chamroeurn M People Thlok Viilage 125 Phay Seang Ly M People Bak Roneas 126 Saom Channy F People Bak Roneas 127 saom Sao M People Prash Tole 128 Pin Thol M People Aknakot 129 Koung Soeurn M People Aknakot 130 Sok Kan M People Poplea 131 Kaen Duk M People Poplea 132 Kaen Rany M People Poplea 133 LongKoy M People Poplea 134 Ey Sophat M People Poplea 135 Sou Nun F People Poplea 136 Mom Pha M People Poplea 137 Kao Sithorn F People Poplea

155

Appendix 5

138 Yan Sim F People Aknakot 139 Ya Nay F People Aknakot 140 Sou Sam Ath M People Aknakot 141 Pov Socheat M People Aknakot 142 Puk sey M People Poplea 143 Pen Phaly F People Bak Roneas 144 Noun Phally F People Bak Roneas 145 So Sokhunthea F People Prash Tole 146 orn Saran M People Prash Tole 147 Chay Tan M People Prash Tole 148 Sin Kom Pheak F People Bak Roneas 149 Mao Sary F People Bak Roneas 150 Peb Sorn F People Prash Tole 151 Chum San F People Prash Tole 152 Koung Saveth F People Prash Tole 153 Hour Saphoeurn M People Bak Roneas 154 Pov Chan F People Bak Roneas 155 Chay Veasna M People Bak Roneas 156 Chhay Chamrong F People Bak Roneas 157 Meas Yam M People Thlok Viilage 158 En Saroeurn F People Prash Tole 159 Orn Sothany F People Prash Tole 160 Puth Sokhany F People Prash Tole 161 En Sak F People Prash Tole 162 Sao Saman M People Prash Tole 163 Prak Kear Thy F People Prash Tole 164 So Saroeurn F People Prash Tole 165 Srey Soeurn F People Prash Tole 166 Norn Phanna F People Prash Tole 167 Yi Chakriya F People Prash Tole 168 Meas Lat F People Prash Tole 169 Nhem Chanda F People Prash Tole 170 En Line M People Prash Tole 171 Meas Saran F People Prash Tole 172 Long Sarin F People Prash Tole 173 Yi Than F People Prash Tole 174 Penh Yin F People Prash Tole 175 Van Phanna M People Prash Tole

156 Appendix 5

176 Pork Sarem F People Prash Tole 177 Sin Sokha F People Bak Roneas 178 Sok Nhorn F People Poplea 179 Sok Bun F People Aknakot 180 Manh Chean F People Prash Tole 181 Om Sa Orn M People Prash Tole 182 Ey Mao F People Prash Tole 183 Po Chuy M People Prash Tole 184 Orn Suon F People Prash Tole 185 Ken Phalla F People Prash Tole 186 Hoeurng Sophay F People Aknakot 187 En Sarin M People Aknakot 188 Sok Pith M People Poplea 189 Ouk Chea M People Poplea 190 Gnoun Sophan F People Poplea 191 Ngoun Kosal M People Poplea 192 Chain Sareth M People Poplea 193 Pon Sophal F People Poplea 194 Pen Sireth M People Poplea 195 Sok Dy M People Poplea 196 Chem Sakhorn M People Poplea 197 Kim Phorn M People Aknakot 198 Puth Chhoet M People Aknakot 199 Puth Sipha M People Aknakot 200 Prum Kunthea F People Aknakot 201 Nay Ren M People Aknakot 202 Khat Sang F People Aknakot 203 Kim Savan F People Aknakot 204 Peb Saran M People Aknakot 205 Prak Pich M People Aknakot 206 He Choeurn M People Aknakot 207 Ouk Orn F People Aknakot 208 Sok Buntha F People Aknakot 209 Chan rithy M People Poplea

Writing by Local Resettlement consultant

Mr. Seang Bora

157

Appendix 5

Minutes Meeting for post-IOL at Rum Duol District-NR-13

- Date: Monday, 21/ June, 2011 - Place: Rumduol District center - Time: 2h00 PM Participants

1- PenSam An (Chief of Dumduol District) 2- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT 3- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) 4- Commune Chief, Commune Council of Kampong Chork and Villages head)

AGENDA

A- Mr. Pen Sam An (Chief of Romduol district) Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-13 from border of Svay Rieng to border of Romeas Haek district have 4 communes and 12villages. and Participants during this meeting (see attach files ), and after that Chief of district transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT) and Local Resettlement Consultant to explain the result as following:

B- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT)

Thanks you very much for present of Chief of district, Commune Chiefs, Village headman and all of affected people that has present here today. Referring to population and Transportation were increased from day to day, The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 13 from NR-1 to NR-8, 65 km; construct a new cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1, between Komchay Mear NR150B,

158 Appendix 5

53 and 151B which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces, we need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved after construction. The Pre-IOL was conducted in May 2011, Now, Post-IOL are inform the meeting to understanding the result of Inventory loss, But the result will introduce by Local Resettlement Consultant.

C- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)

Again, I would like to say thanks you very much for Chief of district, Commune Chiefs, Village headman and all of affected people that has present meeting here today. We was first meeting with authorities in May 2011, by not participated with for proposed authorities to inform to all APs know information about survey team to measured, interview APs along the NR 13 for conducted Inventory of Loss in area of Rumduol district.

Now, this is second meeting that have authorities and affected people participate to understand the Primary data result during conducted IOL. During conducted pre-IOL, the team were study along NR-13 there are 4 districts, 11 communes and 39 villages and Survey team was conducted measured, Interviewed IOL and SES with affected people that affected in the COI ten meters each side from centerline, the total affected people around 65Km is 676 households, Interview with men are 381 households, interview with women are 101 households and did not meet owners are 472households. In 676 households affected residential land 1690.1m2, Commercial land is 1026.9m2; agricultural land is 44681.3m2, electric post 42 and telephone post and affected 105 houses, House/Store 03, Store/ Shops/ Restaurant 114. Divorced 8 households, Widow 30 households, Disable 5 households, Poor 96 households. Affected people total 676 household are legible APs that project affected people for NR 13, So all of properties affected by project will compensate base on replacement cost study result at currently market value after approved rate from IRC at MEF and for vulnerable group like Widow, Elderly, handicap, displace people and people income under national poverty line will haveassistance out of properties affected by project. Rumduol district were conducted with 4 communes, 12 villages that affected with Project.

Cutoff date: The project was limited the date of IOL is cutoff date that mead by no more structures will build in the COI.

The projects still have option to minimize impact, should be keep the same COI or decrease COI for urban area depending on detail design of road engineering.

Grievance redress and participation: The grievance redress process includes four stages. There are three stages before complaints may be elevated to a court of law as a last resort.

(xiii) First stage: APs will present their complaints andgrievances verbally or in writing to the CLAC. The CLAC will be obliged to provide immediate written confirmation of receiving the complaint. If after 15 days the aggrieved AP does not hear from the CLAC, or if the AP is not satisfied with the decision taken in the first stage, the complaint may be brought to the District Office.

159

Appendix 5

(xiv) Second stage: The District Office has 15days within which to resolve the complaint to the satisfaction of all concerned. If the complaint cannot be solved at this stage, the District Office will bring the case to the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee. (xv) Third stage: The Provincial GrievanceRedress Committee meets with the aggrieved party and tries to resolve the situation. The Committee may ask for a review of the DMS by the external monitor (EMO). Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Committee must make a written decision and submit copies to the MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP. (xvi) Final stage: If the aggrievedAP does not hear from the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee or is not satisfied, he/she will bring the case to Provincial Court. This is the final stage for adjudicating complaints. Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Court must make a written decision and submit copies to the MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP. If any party is still unsatisfied with the Provincial Court judgment, he/she can bring the case to a higher-level court.

Attendants List

Province: Rumduol District

No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village 1 Pen Sam An M Rumduol 2 Try Yorn M Resettlement Unit MPWT 3 Seang Bora M Local Consultant KCI 4 Da Boraen M People Prey Keav 5 Sao Sarim M People Prey Keav 6 Sao Sarorn M People Prey Keav 7 Yin Outh F People Chork 8 Sun Phalla F People Prey Keav 9 Nuon Kim M People Prey Keav 10 Sem Bunthorurn M People Prey Keav 11 Yang Sarorn M People Chork 12 Duch Chantha F People Chork 13 Kim Sarin F People Prey Keav 14 Kung Kunthea M People Prey Keav 15 Prak Sary F People Prey Keav 16 Chet Chanthorn M Village head Prey Keav 17 Pov Sinareth F People Prey Keav 18 Prum Sopha F People Chork 19 Heang Bunthoeurn M People Chork 20 Sok Sarorn M Village deouty Chork 21 Kem Vanna F People Prey Keav 22 Soch Saroeurn F People Chork 23 Nuon Khan M People Chork 24 Pen Sam An M Commune council Kampong Chork 25 Orn Rithy M People Prey Keav 26 Mao Phalla M People Chork 27 Has Srey Neang F People Chork 28 Ou Phany F People Prey Keav 29 Yi Vany F People Prey Keav

160 Appendix 5

30 Em Da F People Chork 31 Chea Thida F People Chork 32 Phal Sitha F People Chork 33 Hun Vanny F People Prey Keav 34 Naiy Sar M Admin Rumduol district 35 Kao Boren F People Prey Keav 36 Mey Navy F People Chork 37 Kung Piseth F People Chork 38 Pich Srey Naeng F People Chork 39 Toch Sinath M People Chork 40 Me Sophon F People Chork 41 Uk Kunthea F People Chork 42 Sorn Vanthorn F People Chork 43 Nuon Saron M People Chork 44 Ros Mara M Director of High school Chork 45 Long Saron M Teacher Chork 46 Seng Heang M People Chork 47 Loek sary F People Prey Keav 48 Kim Sakhorn M People Chork 49 Roth Sam Oeurn M People Chork 50 Em Sothea M People Chork 51 Mao Chanra M People Chork 52 Chap Sok F People Chork 53 Orn Saphat F People Prey Keav 54 Hing Vanna M People Prey Keav 55 Pov Khanpanharith M People Chork 56 Prum Savan M People Chork 57 Bo Kosal M People Chork 58 Meas Kala M People Chork 59 Kuy Ang M People Chork 60 Pen Sam M People Chork 61 Um Sopha F People Chork 62 Yim Heang F People Chork 63 Tang Sokhorn F People Chork 64 Pe OL M People Chork

65 Total participants are 64 persons, Female 27 persons

Writing by Local Resettlement consultant

Mr. Seang Bora

161

Appendix 5

Minutes Meeting for post-IOL at Romeas Haek District-NR-13

- Date: Monday, 22/ June, 2011 - Place: Prasre Commune post center - Time: 9h00 AM I- Participants

1- Mr.Haen Sakun (Deputy of Romeas Haek District) 2- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT 3- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) 4- Chief of police post 5- Commune Chief, Commune Council of Kampong Chork and Villages head)

II- AGENDA

A- Mr. Haen Sakun (Deputy of Romeas Haek District) Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-13 from border of Rumduol to border of Kamchay Mear district have 5 communes and 19villages. and Participants during this meeting (see attach files ), and after that Chief of district transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT) and Local Resettlement Consultant to explain the primary result during IOL as following:

B- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT)

Thanks you very much for present of Deputy district of Romeas Haek, Commune Chiefs, Village headman and all of affected people that has present here today. Referring to population and Transportation were increased from day to day, The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 13 from NR-1 to NR-8, 65 km; construct a new cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1, between Komchay Mear NR150B, 53 and 151B which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces,

162 Appendix 5

we need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved after construction. The Pre-IOL was conducted in May 2011, Now, Post-IOL are inform the meeting to understanding the result of Inventory loss, But the result will introduce by Local Resettlement Consultant.

C- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)

Now, this is second meeting that have authorities and affected people participate to understand the Primary data result during conducted IOL. During conducted pre-IOL, the team were study along NR-13 there are 4 districts, 11 communes and 39 villages and Survey team was conducted measured, Interviewed IOL and SES with affected people that affected in the COI ten meters each side from centerline, the total affected people around 65Km is 676 households, Interview with men are 381 households, interview with women are 101 households and did not meet owners are 472households. In 676 households affected residential land 1690.1m2, Commercial land is 1026.9m2; agricultural land is 44681.3m2, and affected 105 houses, House/Store 03, Store/ Shops/ Restaurant 114. Divorced 8 households, Widow 30 households, Disable 5 households, Poor is 96 households. Affected people total 676 household are legible APs that project affected people for NR 13, So all of properties affected by project will compensate base on replacement cost study result at currently market value after approved rate from IRC at MEF and for vulnerable group like Widow, Elderly, handicap, displace people and people income under national poverty line will haveassistance out of properties affected by project. Rumduol district were conducted with5 communes, 19 villages that affected with Project.

Cutoff date: The project was limited the date of IOL is cutoff date that mead by no more structures will build in the COI.

The projects still have option to minimize impact, should be keep the same COI or decrease COI for urban area depending on detail design of road engineering.

Grievance redress and participation: The grievance redress process includes four stages. There are three stages before complaints may be elevated to a court of law as a last resort.

(xvii) First stage: APs will present their complaints andgrievances verbally or in writing to the CLAC. The CLAC will be obliged to provide immediate written confirmation of receiving the complaint. If after 15 days the aggrieved AP does not hear from the CLAC, or if the AP is not satisfied with the decision taken in the first stage, the complaint may be brought to the District Office. (xviii) Second stage: The District Office has 15days within which to resolve the complaint to the satisfaction of all concerned. If the complaint cannot be solved at

163

Appendix 5

this stage, the District Office will bring the case to the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee. (xix) Third stage: The Provincial GrievanceRedress Committee meets with the aggrieved party and tries to resolve the situation. The Committee may ask for a review of the DMS by the external monitor (EMO). Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Committee must make a written decision and submit copies to the MPWT,PRS/IRC and the AP. (xx) Final stage: If the aggrievedAP does not hear from the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee or is not satisfied, he/she will bring the case to Provincial Court. This is the final stage for adjudicating complaints. Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Court must make a written decision and submit copies to the IMPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP. If any party is still unsatisfied with the Provincial Court judgment, he/she can bring the case to a higher-level court.

Attendants List

Province: Romeas Haek District

No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village 1 Haen Sakun M Deputy of District Romeas Haek 2 Try Yorn M Resettlement Unit MPWT 3 Seang Bora M Local Consultant KCI 4 Prak Chhoet M People Samroung 5 Chang vay M People Samroung 6 Mao Sophal M People Samroung 7 Pich Chea M People Samroung 8 Saom Rin M People Thnal Peam 9 Nong Saly M People Samroung 10 Mork Savat M People Trapeang Rum Denh 11 Chheang Thou M People Trapeang Rum Denh 12 Srey Khean M People Samroung 13 Hun Ley M People Samroung 14 Chhaom Mao M People Samroung 15 Sam Ean M People Trapeang Rum Denh 16 Yu Voen M People Samroung 17 Ou Saphal M People Samroung 18 En Nary F People Trapeang Rum Denh 19 Taen Vibol M People Trapeang Rum Denh 20 Some May F People Trapeang Rum Denh 21 Meas Saroeurn M People Trapeang Rum Denh 22 Gnuy Nay Sim F People Samroung 23 Keo Tiem M People Trapeang Rum Denh 24 Pen Kosal M People Trapeang Rum Denh 25 Nung Huy F People Trapeang Rum Denh 26 Kuy Sath M People Trapeang Rum Denh 27 Chan Sambath F People Thnal Peam 28 Kung Savuth M People Trapeang Rum Denh 29 Nun Thy M People Samroung 30 Rach Bandol F People Samroung

164 Appendix 5

31 Sok Sopheap M People Samroung 32 Koung Sinoeurn M People Trapeang Rum Denh 33 Keo Navy F People Samroung 34 Ean Savorn F People Samroung 35 Hing Manh F People Samroung 36 Hing Saron F People Samroung 37 Sao Chhao F People Samroung 38 Srey Navy F People Samroung 39 Lak Srey Noeurn F People Samroung 40 Keo Sokha F People Samroung 41 Pich Neang F People Samroung 42 Saom Navy F People Samroung 43 Svay Kapha F People Trapeang Rum Denh 44 Tith Raem F People Trapeang Rum Denh 45 Tith Kheng F People Trapeang Rum Denh 46 Svay Em F People Trapeang Rum Denh 47 chuon Thorn M People Trapeang Rum Denh 48 Hang Ham F People Trapeang Rum Denh 49 Chan Sambo F People Thnal Peam 50 Kroch Pha F People Thnal Peam 51 Ey Samey F People Samroung 52 Prum Phanna People Samroung 53 Him Dary People Samroung 54 Hing Saroeurn People Samroung 55 Chan Sokha People Thnal Peam 56 Hem Bopha People Samroung 57 Ros Ear People Thnal Peam 58 Keo Srey on People Thnal Peam 59 Um Chheng People Samroung 60 Keo Pha People Thnal Peam 61 Kung Ean People Trapeang Rum Denh 62 Preap Chantha People Thnal Peam 63 Chan Saban Village head Samroung 64

65 Total participants are 60 persons, Female 24 persons

Writing by Local Resettlement consultant

Mr. Seang Bora

165

Appendix 5

Minutes Meeting for post-IOL at Kamchay Mear District-NR-13

- Date: Monday, 22/ June, 2011 - Place: Krabao Village - Time: 2h00 PM I- Participants

1- Mr. Yung Cham (Chief of Krabaov Commune) 2- Mr. Yaet Yort (Pubblic Work of District) 3- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT 4- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) 5- Commune Councils and Villages head)

II- AGENDA

A- Mr. Yung Cham (Chief of Krabaov Commune) Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-13 from border of Romeas Haek to National road number 8, have 1 commune and 2villages. and Participants during this meeting (see attach files ), and after that Chief of district transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT) and Local Resettlement Consultant to explain the primary result during IOL as following:

B- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT)

Thanks you very much for present of Deputy of district, Chief of Commune, Village headman and all of affected people that has present here today. Referring to population and Transportation were increased from day to day, The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 13 from NR-1 to NR-8, 65 km; construct a new cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1, between Komchay Mear NR150B, 53 and 151B which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces, we need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved

166 Appendix 5

after construction. The Pre-IOL was conducted in May 2011, Now, Post-IOL are inform the meeting to understanding the result of Inventory loss, But the result will introduce by Local Resettlement Consultant.

C- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)

Now, this is second meeting that have authorities and affected people participate to understand the Primary data result during conducted IOL. During conducted pre-IOL, the team were study along NR-13 there are 4 districts, 11 communes and 39 villages and Survey team was conducted measured, Interviewed IOL and SES with affected people that affected in the COI ten meters each side from centerline, the total affected people around 65Km is 676 households, Interview with men are 381 households, interview with women are 101 households and did not meet owners are 472households. In 676 households affected residential land 1690.1m2, Commercial land is 1026.9m2; agricultural land is 44681.3m2, and affected 105 houses, House/Store 03, Store/ Shops/ Restaurant 114. Divorced 8 households, Widow 30 households, Disable 5 households, Poor is 96 households. Affected people total 676 household are legible APs that project affected people for NR 13, So all of properties affected by project will compensate base on replacement cost study result at currently market value after approved rate from IRC at MEF and for vulnerable group like Widow, Elderly, handicap, displace people and people income under national poverty line will haveassistance out of properties affected by project. Rumduol district were conducted with5 communes, 19 villages that affected with Project.

Cutoff date: The project was limited the date of IOL is cutoff date that mead by no more structures will build in the COI.

The projects still have option to minimize impact, should be keep the same COI or decrease COI for urban area depending on detail design of road engineering.

Grievance redress and participation: The grievance redress process includes four stages. There are three stages before complaints may be elevated to a court of law as a last resort.

167

Appendix 5

(iii) Third stage: The Provincial GrievanceRedress Committee meets with the aggrieved party and tries to resolve the situation. The Committee may ask for a review of the DMS by the external monitor (EMO). Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Committee must make a written decision and submit copies to the MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP. (iv) Final stage: If the aggrievedAP does not hear from the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee or is not satisfied, he/she will bring the case to Provincial Court. This is the final stage for adjudicating complaints. Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Court must make a written decision and submit copies to the, MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP. If any party is still unsatisfied with the Provincial Court judgment, he/she can bring the case to a higher-level court. Attendants List

Province: Kamchay Mear District

No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village 1 2 Try Yorn M Resettlement Unit MPWT 3 Seang Bora M Local Consultant KCI 4 Sam Sy M People Thbong Vat village 5 Ya F People Veal Smach village 6 Hem Sarith M People Thbong Vat village 7 Pon Run F People Veal Smach village 8 Yin Pin M People Veal Smach village 9 Yang Hean M People Thbong Vat village 10 Put Sam Ol M People Thbong Vat village 11 Lean Dorn M People Thbong Vat village 12 Kroch Phay F People Thbong Vat village 13 Sam Mao M People Thbong Vat village 14 Saom Loeurng M People Thbong Vat village 15 Sorn Vin F People Thbong Vat village 16 Yu Kim San F People Thbong Vat village 17 Heng Soteang F People Thbong Vat village 18 Horm Try F People Thbong Vat village 19 Mao Sopheap F People Thbong Vat village 20 Um Veasna M People Veal Smach village 21 Heng Sokny F People Thbong Vat village 22 Yum Rom F People Thbong Vat village 23 Pich San F People Veal Smach village 24 Ma Kear F People Thbong Vat village 25 Chin Sovan M People Veal Smach village 26 Hing Samon M People Thbong Vat village 27 Kung Malate M People Thbong Vat village 28 Put Samnang M People Thbong Vat village

168 Appendix 5

29 Him Salom M People Veal Smach village 30 Vuth Srey F People Veal Smach village 31 Thoeurn Los M People Veal Smach village 32 NHoung Saran M People Veal Smach village 33 Sarin Hay M People Veal Smach village 34 Oun Sa Em M People Veal Smach village 35 Ney Cham Nan M People Thbong Vat village 36 Khal Khun M People Veal Smach village 37 Yus Tha M People Veal Smach village 38 Saom Luy M People Thbong Vat village 39 Yung Saet M People Thbong Vat village 40 Nguy Heang M People Thbong Vat village 41 Ream Phanna M People Thbong Vat village 42 Sum Chan M People Thbong Vat village 43 Saom Thuch M People Thbong Vat village 44 Chhit Sras M People Thbong Vat village 45 Huot Saran M People Thbong Vat village 46 Rith Heng M People Thbong Vat village 47 Nhiek Laly F People Thbong Vat village 48 Horm Tuel M People Thbong Vat village 49 Nhiek Yoeurn F People Thbong Vat village 50 Neth Bopha F People Thbong Vat village 51 Em Salouth F People Thbong Vat village 52 Nhe Sokly F People Veal Smach village 53 Khuon Yon M People Thbong Vat village 54 Bun Mon F People Thbong Vat village 55 Chon Samphost F People Thbong Vat village 56 Reth Soeurn M People Thbong Vat village 57 Oung Thy F People Thbong Vat village 58 Neth Nov F People Thbong Vat village 59 Saom Yoeurng F People Thbong Vat village 60 Sao Sovin F People Thbong Vat village 61 Meas Savoeurn F People Thbong Vat village 62 Kem Siban F People Thbong Vat village 63 Saom Saveth F People Thbong Vat village 64 Khem Sreng M People Thbong Vat village

65 Mey Sok Kem F People Thbong Vat village 66 Hem Phan F People Thbong Vat village

169

Appendix 5

67 Von Canal F People Thbong Vat village 68 Pon Kheng F People Thbong Vat village 69 Py Mom F People Thbong Vat village 70 Hong Heng M People Thbong Vat village 71 Toeur Nay San F People Thbong Vat village 72 Se San Ath F People Thbong Vat village 73 Bean Han F People Veal Smach village 74 Yung Chonh M People Thbong Vat village

Total participants are 74 persons, Female 34 persons

Writing by Local Resettlement consultant

Mr. Seang Bora

170 Appendix 6

PUBLIC INFORMATION BROCHURE (IRC) will supervise the implementation of existing road. The COI is narrower than the the Resettlement Plan (RP). The Ministry of road right-of-way (ROW) that has been Cambodia Provincial Roads Public Works and Transport (MPWT) has established along road section. The COI Improvement Project established a Social and Environmental has a width of maximum 20 m (10 m either Office (SEO) to implement and monitor the side of the road centerline). MPWT will PUBLIC INFORMATION BOOKLET implementation of the RP for affected land, place demarcation markers on the ground 1. QUESTION: What is the Asian structures, crops and trees along the road. before a detailed measurement survey (DMS) starts. Its purpose is to define an Development Bank (ADB) Cambodia 3. QUESTION: Are the improvements of area reserved for the road improvements, Provincial Roads Improvement Project? the roads and cross-border facility and to establish who is affected by the intended to benefit us? ANSWER: The Royal Government of Project. Cambodia (RGC) proposes to use funds ANSWER: Yes. The roads will be improved Everyone that is occupying or using land in from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) to to paved condition to provide a safer, the COI must move out of the COI. All improve Provincial Road Improvement cost-effective provincial road network with people must also remove from land Project No. 314D, 13 at Svay Rieng and all-year access to markets and other social acquired to expand the border facilities or Prey Veng province and road numbers, services for provincial centers in the project for the road realignment. During detailed 150B, 53 and 151B at Kampong Chhnang areas Improved roads will enable the design, every effort will be made to and Kampong Speu province, and to transportation of goods and people to be minimize the impacts. upgrade and expand the border facilities at quicker, more efficient and cheaper. The Prey Var in Kampong Rou district (Svay new and improved roads will improve A preliminary census and inventory of Rieng province). The TA is part of a regional inter-provincial connectivity as well as losses (IOL) was conducted in May-June project to improve road links between cross-border trade and movement at the 2011 to determine the potentially affected Cambodia and Viet Nam on road No. 314D Prey Var-Moc Va border crossing point. persons and the severity of impacts on their from NR-1 at Svay Teab to Kampong Rou properties. Based on the IOL, a preliminary 4. QUESTION: If there are road district and NR-13 from National road No. 1 list of eligible persons and their losses has construction activities in our locality, to National Road No.8 at Prey Veng been prepared, and is available in your will we be affected? province, NR-150B,53 and 151B from commune office. After the detailed design Taches to Amleang commune in Tphong ANSWER: There will be three main types of for road improvements is finalized and the district (Kampong Speu province). land acquisition impacts: (i) expansion of COI demarcated, DMS will be conducted The project will also support a sustainable the existing roads within the existing road and a final list of eligible persons prepared. rights of way; (ii) creation of a 1.2km new road maintenance regime in the Ministry 5. QUESTION: What if my land will be alignment on PR150B at Chaung Moung ofPublic Works and Transport (MPWT), affected by the Project? HIV/AIDS and human trafficking prevention commune requiring privately owned farming program, road safety and climate change land; and (iii) expansion of the Cross Border ANSWER: Acquired privately owned land adaptation measures. Facility at Prey Var requiring approximately will be compensated at replacement cost 5ha of land, of which 2.5ha is privately which is market value plus reasonable 2. QUESTION: Who is responsible for owned. transaction costs. Land within the existing the Project? road right of way will not be compensated. As part of the Provincial Road Improvement However, those losing use of productive ANSWER: The RGC represented by the Project, MPWT will establish a Corridor of (farming) land within the road right of way Inter-Ministerial Resettlement Committee Impact (COI) on 10m each side of the

171

Appendix 6 will be entitled to assistance for loss of land will be used by the Project and that they resettlement plan. Those relocating use of productive land. must harvest their crops in time. If standing outside the road right of way altogether crops are ripening and cannot be under this project will be entitled to higher 6. QUESTION: What are the entitlements harvested, eligible affected persons can be levels of support compared to those that we have in order to be compensated for the loss of the relocating within the road right of way. compensated? unharvested crops at the current market Affected persons will receive compensation ANSWER: Cut off dates for entitlement to value. For perennial crops, affected at replacement cost for affected structures compensation and assistance have been persons will be compensated for the loss of plus transitional allowances to assist in the established for each project section fruit and timber trees at replacement value, process of relocating. Transitional corresponding to the date of completion of which value will take account of lost assistance will consist of: (i) Transportation the inventory of losses. The respective cut potential income and time required to allowance; (ii) One time assistance off dates are 20 May 2011 for PR314D; 2 re-establish the perennial trees. This will allowance of $100 if movingback within the June 2011 for NR13 and CBF; 12 June compensate for lost income until the newly road right of way or $200 if moving outside 2011 for PR150B; 17 June 2011 for NR13; planted seedlings bear fruit. Affected the road right of way; (iii) income loss and 19 June 2011 for PR151B. Those persons will be awarded the full value of any allowance for disrupted businesses; and (iv) persons who have occupied and used the lost crops/fruit where the plants are near or additional assistance for vulnerable land prior to this cut off date are entitled to ready to harvest. households. Renters will be eligible for compensation if the project construction 9. QUESTION: What about public three months rental assistance. affects their land and/or structures. Anyone property resources? who encroaches and occupies the land The specific amounts for compensation after the cut off date will not be eligible for ANSWER: Affected buildings and rates as well as allowances and assistance compensation or assistance. structures will be restored to original or will be advised at the time the resettlement better condition. plan is updated. 7. QUESTION: Does compensation apply to my affected houses or structures? 10. QUESTION: If in case there will be 11. QUESTION: If in case our livelihoods relocation of houses or businesses are affected, how can the Project help ANSWER: Yes. Houses and structures that involved, how can the Project help me me restore my livelihood and living will be affected by the Project shall be rebuild my house during relocation? standards? compensated at replacement cost without deduction for depreciation or salvageable ANSWER: Affected persons will have the ANSWER: The census and detailed materials. Partially affected houses will be option of moving back outside the corridor measurement survey (DMS) will take note compensated for the lost affected portion as of impact but within the road right of way, or of the livelihoods of affected persons and well as repair costs. Other structures (e.g. moving outside the right of way altogether. any impacts the Project may have. The fences, wells, pavement) will also be Those relocating within the road right of way Project will provide various forms of compensated at replacement cost. will be permitted to remain there until assistance to enable affected people to theland is needed by the Government for restore their livelihoods and living 8. QUESTION: What about my crops and any future public works but will not be conditions to at least pre-project levels. For trees? permitted to build permanent structures. If vulnerable households (e.g. those classed ANSWER: For annual crops, affected such future displacement is required those as poor, disabled, etc.), the Project will persons will be given advance notice that required to relocate will be entitled to similar seek to improve living standards to at least the land on which their crops are planted forms of assistance as provided under this minimum national standards. Such forms of

172 Appendix 6 assistance will include: (i) one time will only be carried out in the presence of providing a translated version to each local assistance allowance to households losing the affected persons. The affected persons district and commune office for public more than 10% of the productive assets or and the local authorities will be informed access and by uploading it on ADB’s being required to relocate their houses or prior to the activity. website. shops outside the corridor of impact 13. QUESTION: How will the Project 14. QUESTION: If I disagree or problems depending of the type and severity of consult with me and provide arise during project implementation impact; (ii) for those losing loss of use of information? such as compensation, technical, and productive land within the road right of way, other project-related issues, do I have cash assistance for loss of land use; (iii) ANSWER: The Project has prepared a the right to voice my complaint? cash assistance to cover transportation communication and consultation plan. The costs; (iv) cash grant for temporary Project will keep local communities ANSWER: Yes. If the affected person is not disruption to business income for affected informed of significant activities. Regular clear about or not satisfied with the shops/stalls; (v) potentially other forms of information will be provided to the compensation package offered or, if for any income restoration measures to be commune offices, village chiefs and local reason, the compensation does not determined during updating of the community-based organizations as well as materialize according to the agreed resettlement plan in consultation with those other culturally recognized community schedule, the affected person has the right affected; and (vi) additional special leaders. The local commune offices will to lodge a complaint. The grievance assistance to vulnerable households. maintain a public notice board where redress mechanism consists of a four stage significant information and schedules will In addition the Project will seek to maximize process as follows: be posted. In addition to this affected project work opportunities to adults in the households will be consulted directly First Stage, Commune Level: An aggrieved affected local communities (both men and through public consultation meetings on women) during the implementation phases. person may bring his/her complaint to the significant matters affecting them. Such Such opportunities will be announced in the commune leader. The commune leader public consultation meetings will take place together with the representative/s of the local areas. (i) prior to the conduct of the DMS (to Provincial Resettlement Sub-Committee 12. QUESTION: What is the detailed advise survey schedules and procedures), Working Group (PRSC-WG) coming from measurement survey and when will it be (ii) following the DMS (to advise of DMS the district offices will call for a meeting of conducted? results and proposed mitigation measures), the Group to decide on a course of action (iii) during preparation of the updated to resolve the complaint within 15 days ANSWER: The DMS is a detailed survey of resettlement plan (to identify appropriate following the lodging of the complaint by 100% of affected persons to document all livelihood restoration measures, advise of the aggrieved person. The commune affected assets including land, houses, compensation rates and details of leader is responsible for documenting and shops, other structures, crops and trees. It allowances and assistance measures as keeping file of all complaints that are establishes the official list of affected well as details of resettlement coursed through it. persons who are eligible for compensation arrangements); and (iv) on-going through Second Stage, Provincial Resettlement and other assistance. It will be conducted implementation of the resettlement plan. In Sub-committee Working Group: If after 15 after detailed engineering for the road and addition the Project will publically disclose days the aggrieved person does not hear border facilities is completed, and the COI the approved updated resettlement plan from the commune leader, or if the person has been marked on the ground. The through a public information brochure is not satisfied with the decision taken by activity will be carried out early in the project (distributed to all affected households), by the commune and district officials, the implementation stage in 2012. The activity

173

Appendix 6 complaint can be brought to the office of expected to commence in the 4th quarter of 16. If you have further queries and the PRSC-WG (provincial level), either in 2012. Affected communities will be kept suggestions, please contact us at: writing or verbally. It is incumbent upon said informed of updated activity schedules from (i) Provincial Department of Public Works member of the PRSC-WG to notify the May 2012. (PDPW) Resettlement Sub-Committee in the other members of the Group. The Team 14. QUESTION: How will you know if following provinces: Svay Rieng, Kampong Leader of the PRSC-WG will call for a these undertakings are kept and the Chhnang. Prey Veng and Kampong Speu meeting of the Group to decide on a course objectives of this Project are met? Ministry of Public Works and Transport of action to resolve the complaint within 15 (Phnom Penh) . days following the lodging of the complaint ANSWER: All project activities will be by the aggrieved person. The PRSC-WG is monitored by: The Social and Environment (ii) Project Management Unit 3, Provincial responsible for documenting and keeping Office of the Project Management Unit-3 of Roads Improvement Project file of all complaints that are coursed the Ministry of Public Works and Transport Attention: Social and Environment Office through it. and by an External Monitoring Agency Third Stage, Inter-ministerial Resettlement (EMA). Address: 4th Floor, Eastern Building, Committee: If after 15 days the aggrieved Corner Norodom Blvd. & Street 106, Phnom Monthly Report and Quarterly Reports will person does not hear from the PRSC-WG, Penh or if the person is not satisfied with the be prepared and submitted to ADB. A post-resettlement impact evaluation will decision taken by the PRSC-WG, the Phone: [add] also be undertaken to assess whether complaint may be brought to the office of Email: [add] impacts of the Project have been mitigated the IRC, through the IRC-RD, either in adequately and the pre-project standard of writing or verbally. The IRC has 15 days (iii) Inter-Ministerial Resettlement within which to resolve the complaint to the living of affected persons have been Committee, Resettlement Department, satisfaction of all concerned. The IRC is restored as a result of the resettlement and Ministry of Economy and Finance (Phnom project. ADB will also monitor these responsible for documenting and keeping Penh) – Tel/Fax: 023 42 66 82 activities in its regular supervision missions file of all complaints that reaches it. during project implementation. Semi-annual (iv) Asian Development Bank Resident Final Stage, Court of Law: If after 15 days Mission - Phnom Penh. Tel: (023) 215 805, following the lodging of the complaint the reports of the EMA will be disclosed to aggrieved person is not satisfied with the affected communities. Fax: 023 215 807 decision taken by the IRC, or if the person 15. QUESTION: Are there any other does not hear from the IRC, the complaint documents available to know more may be brought to a court of law for about the Project and resettlement adjudication. The rules of court will be issues? followed in the resolution of the complaint. ANSWER: The draft RP prepared during 13. QUESTION: When is the project the feasibility studies for the Project can be expect to start? obtained from the commune, district and provincial offices. Following detailed ANSWER: The project is expected to engineering design and the DMS, the RP commence in April 2012. The updated will be updated and the final version will be resettlement plan will require at least 4 available in these offices. months to prepare and site clearance is

174