Cl,Erk of Cqurt Supreme Court of Ohio Table of Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cl,Erk of Cqurt Supreme Court of Ohio Table of Contents IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO No. 09-0868 TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC. And CITY OF AKRON, On Appeal from the Summit County Court of Appellees Appeals, Ninth District V. Court of Appeals Case No. 24233 CHIEF MEDICAL EXAMINER OF SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO a/k/a LISA KOHLER, M.D. Appellant APPELLEE TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S MEMORANDUM IN RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF JURISDICTION Dean Holman William A. Nolan (Atty. #0041891) Medina County Prosecutor [email protected] [email protected] Counsel of Record William L. Thome BARNES & THORNBURG LLP [email protected] 21 East State Street, Suite 1850 Assistant County Prosecutor Columbus, Ohio 43215-4219 73 Public Square 614.628.0096, 614.628.1433(fax) Medina, Ohio 44256 330.723.9536, 330.764.8400 (fax) John R. Maley (pro hac vice) [email protected] Counsel for Appellant Chief Medical Examiner BARNES & THORNBURG LLP 11 South Meridian Street Patricia Ambrose Rubright Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 [email protected] 317.231.7464, 317.231.7433(fax) Michael J. Defibaugh [email protected] Counsel for Appellee Assistant Directors of Law TASER hiternational, hic. City of Akron 161 South High Street, Suite 202 Akron, Ohio 44308 330.373.2030, 330.375.2041(fax) ED Counsel for Appellee City of Akron j (;^^ j2 CL,ERK OF CQURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO TABLE OF CONTENTS APPELLEE TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S STATEMENT OF POSITION AS TO WHETHER A SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION IS INVOLVED, AND WHETHER THE CASE IS OF PUBLIC OR GREAT GENERAL INTEREST ................. ...................................................................................1 A. Any Constitutional Issues Were Waived Below, And No Substantial Constitutional Question Is Presented .............................................................................1 B. The Medical Examiner Waived Her Claimed Rule 702 Evidentiary Error Below, And The Issue Is Not One Of Public Or Great General Interest ..............2 C. The Standing Issue Was Waived Below, There Was No Abuse Of Discretion In Detennining That The Manufacturer Being Blamed By The Medical Examiner For Three Drug-Related Deaths Had No Standing, And The Issue Is Not Worthy Of Discretionary Review ...............................3 STATEMENT OF THE CASE ..................................................................................................4 A. Procedural History ..... ...............................................................................................4 1. Waiver Of Standing Issue .... ..............................................................................4 2. No Constitutional Issues Asserted .....................................................................6 3. The Evidentiary Ruling On Expert Testimony ..................................................6 B. The Decisions Below ....................................................................................................7 ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITIONS OF LAW ..................................................8 A. The Medical Examiner's Waived Constitutional Argument Fails Procedurally And On The Merits ...................................................................................8 B. The Trial Court Judge Did Not Abuse His Discretion hi Applying Ohio R. Evid. 702 And Requiring Reliable Scientific, Medical, Or Electrical Evidence From The Medical Examiner .......................................................10 C. The Trial Court Judge Did Not Abuse His Discretion In Determining That TASER Had Standing To Bring This Special Statutory Action ..........................11 CONCLUSION .... ..............................................................................................13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ................................................................................................14 i APPELLEE TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S STATEMENT OF POSITION AS TO WHETHER A SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION IS INVOLVED, AND WHETHER THE CASE IS OF PUBLIC OR GREAT GENERAL INTEREST The Summit County Medical Examiner presents neither a substantial constitutional question, nor a case of public or great general interest, having waived each of the three issues she asks this Court to review. Moreover, the asserted evidentiary and procedural issues - by the Medical Examiner's own admission - were to be reviewed deferentially by the Court of Appeals for abuse of discretion. This Court should not invoke its limited resources to review discretionary trial court decisions waived below. A. Any Constitutional Issues Were Waived Below, And No Substantial Constitutional Question Is Presented. Throughout the trial court proceedings the Medical Examiner never asserted a constitutional issue: not in her Answer, not by motion, and not by any other means. Constitutional arguments cannot be raised for the first time on appeal in civil matters. See Ritenauer v. Lorain Country Club Ltd. (Sept. 12, 2001), 9th Dist. No. 01 CA007811 (civil litigant will have "waived the right to contest an issue on appeal if that issue was not raised at the appropriate time in the trial court"). TASER filed a complaint, first amended complaint, and second amended complaint in this action. In answering each complaint, the Medical Examiner never raised any constitutional issues. Moreover, through trial and entry of judgment, the Medical Examiner never raised any constitutional issues. The Medical Examiner thus waived the constitutional issue she now asks this Court to exercise its discretion to review. Moreover, in the Court of Appeals the Medical Examiner did not develop the argument sufficiently to seek the Court of Appeals review. The Medical Examiner offered nothing beyond a bare-bones, three-paragraph "constitutional" argument in the Court of Appeals. On the merits, "all statutes are presumed constitutional, and the party challenging a statute bears the burden of 1 proving otherwise ... beyond a reasonable doubt." State v. Boczar, 113 Ohio St.3d 148, 2007- Ohio-1251, 863 N.E.2d 155, at ¶9. The Medical Examiner did not and cannot meet her heavy burden to demonstrate unconstitutionality. B. The Medical Examiner Waived Her Claimed Rule 702 Evidentiary Error Below, And The Issue Is Not One Of Public Or Great General Interest. The Medical Examiner asks this Court to exercise discretionary review over a routine expert witness evidentiary issue: whether she should have been allowed to testify under Evid. Rule 702 as to the speculative and unscientific basis for blaming TASER's product for death. At trial, however, she waived this issue by failing to make an offer of proof as to what the purported testimony would have been. As the Court of Appeals properly ruled, "Because Dr. Kohler did not place an offer of proof on the record with respect to her own testimony and the testimony of [her deputies], and because neither the legal theory of admissibility nor the substance of the excluded testimony is apparent from the context, the trial court's decision to exclude the testimony under Evid. R. 702 cannot be assigned as error." Furthermore, the trial court's evidentiary decision under Ohio R. Evid. 702 was reviewable deferentially for abuse of discretion. Rule 702 requires expert opinions to be based on "reliable scientific, technical, or other specialized information." Medical examiners, of course, are offering medical expert opinions regarding death causation, Vargo v. Travelers Ins. (1987), 34 Ohio St.3d 27, 30, 516 N.E.2d 226, and are held to evidentiary requirements as well. State v. Harrison (May 12, 1993), 1st Dist. No. C-920422. By their own admissions, the Medical Examiner and her staff lacked scientific, medical, or engineering bases to opine that TASER devices caused or contributed to these deaths. Furthermore, the Medical Examiner and her staff admittedly lacked an understanding of the physiological effects of TASER devices on humans. In weighing the evidence and exercising his discretion as the gatekeeper under 2 Rule 702, Judge Schneiderman determined that the Medical Examiner and her staff did not satisfy Rule 702's requirements. Ohio trial courts routinely make such evidentiary decisions involving expert witnesses under Rule 702, and those decisions are routinely reviewed deferentially by the Court of Appeals. This particular discretionary evidentiary issue in this particular case involving these particular witnesses simply is not of public or great general interest. C. The Standing Issue Was Waived Below, There Was No Abuse Of Discretion In Determining That The Manufacturer Being Blamed By The Medical Examiner For Three Drug-Related Deaths Had Standing, And The Issue Is Not Worthy Of Discretionary Review. Ohio R.C. 313.19 "outlines a special statutory procedure allowing judicial review of a coroner's verdict." LeFever v. Licking Cty. Coroner's Office, 5th Dist. No. 06-CA-13, 2006- Ohio-6795, at ¶17. "R.C. 313.19 does not limit who may initiate judicial review of a coroner's verdict." LeFever, 2006-Ohio-6795 at ¶24. hi addressing three drug-related deaths, the Medical Examiner publicly blamed a TASER® electronic control device as causing or contributing to each death, which findings were widely reported. TASER was then sued by the families of two of the decedents. TASER brought an action under Ohio R.C. 313.19 seeking to correct the Medical Examiner's determinations and proceeded on amended complaints. Although the Medical Examiner originally pleaded standing as a defense to the original Complaint and moved to dismiss, that motion was denied and amended complaints were subsequently filed. The
Recommended publications
  • Information © Copyright by the Coffelt Group 2003-2013. Used with Permission
    Information © Copyright by The Coffelt Group 2003-2013. Used with permission. 11th LIB Cemetery Name Listing This document may NOT be reproduced, distributed or displayed in any other medium than the 11th LIB website. BURIAL LAST NAME FIRST NAME MID NAME SUF HOME ST RANK GRADE MOS PLATOON COMPANY BATTALION REGIMENT BIRTHDATE AGE INCIDENT DIED CAS1 CAS2 CAS3 PROV PANEL LINE A R DYCHE MEM PARK, LONDON KY CREECH PHILLIP GENE LONDON KY CPL E3 11B10 3RD PLT D CO 4TH BN 3RD INFANTRY 18137 20 25629 25629 A1 D 7 5 13W 73 ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND CEMETERY, ABERDEEN, MD MORRISSEY JOHN DENNIS ABERDEEN MD CPL E3 91A10 HHC 1ST BN 20TH INFANTRY 17169 22 25384 25384 A1 G 7 5 21W 39 ADDIE CEMETERY, SYLVA NC PARRIS BOBBY JAMES SYLVA NC SP4 E4 11B20 C CO 1ST BN 20TH INFANTRY 17833 22 25868 25868 A2 G 7 5 06W 25 ADULLAM CEMETERY, BERTRAND, NE MATSON WILLMER ARDEN LOOMIS NE CPL E3 11B10 A CO 3RD BN 1ST INFANTRY 18102 20 25642 25642 A1 D 7 5 13W 131 ALBERT CEM, MONTMORENCY CTY MI PYNNONEN MICHAEL JONAS LEWISTON MI CPL E3 11B20 A CO 4TH BN 3RD INFANTRY 17586 22 25656 25656 C2 M 7 5 12W 58 ALL SOULS CEMETERY, VALLEJO, CA GARCIA MARCAS JOSE VALLEJO CA SP4 E4 11B20 RECON PLT E CO 4TH BN 21ST INFANTRY 18199 19 25493 25493 A1 I 7 5 17W 86 ALMA RIVERSIDE CEM, ALMA, MI JONES LARRY ALLEN ST LOUIS MI SP4 E4 91B20 HHC 4TH BN 3RD INFANTRY 17821 19 25087 25087 A1 E 7 5 45W 53 ALTA MESA MEM PARK, PALO ALTO, CA WALKER CLIFFORD WAYNE MOUNTAIN VIEW CA SP4 E4 11C20 B CO 4TH BN 3RD INFANTRY 16116 24 24886 24886 A1 H 7 5 40E 16 ALTUS CEMETERY, ALTUS, OK WABLE SAMUEL LEE ALTUS
    [Show full text]
  • The Ingham County News, !Nco Graphics and H"Lt Miss Jacob Is a Luther League Board Member and the Field of Biological Research Or Medicine
    Vol. 109, No. 16 Wednesday, Apri I 16, 1969 Second cloaa poatogo pold at Mooon, M!ch!gon, Publ!ahod we oldy by PANAX CORPORATION, P,O, Box,225, Moaon, Mloh!gon 48854 9ubacrlptlon rotoa In ln11hom ond odjo!nlngcount!oa, $5 por yoor, ohowhoro $5. / Supervisors.Approve $109~090 Wage Increase . For All Elected County Officials and Employes Ingham county superVisors handed out unprecidented When it came to upping the salaries Supervisor Eugene middle of the year pay raises Tuesday night to almost all Wanger of Lansing voiced objections .. elected arid appointed county officials and county "Tllis salary proposal covers almost 80% of our county employes, employees and will cost more than $109,000.00 during Total additional cost of the package is estimated in the rest of this year. To grant such a raise at this time excess of $109,000 for the balance of the year. clearly violates the principle that massive salary Supervisors Ted Fay of Stockbridge and Dave Buhl of adjustments should only be made as part of the county's Lansing, in proposing the salary schedule upgrading, as annual budget process. In my considered opinion the chairmen of the. personnel and finance committees, public welfare and the wise use of public funds require maintained the action was necessary to keep faith with that this principle not be violated, This is for three county employes who accepted a budget pay increase of reasons. $500 for the year when the old supervisors board pointed "Only through the annual budget process • which is out that the county dld not have the money for bigger both lengthy and thorough - can all the need~ and raises, .
    [Show full text]
  • Cemetery List
    Information © Copyright by The Coffelt Group 2003-2018. Used with permission. This document may NOT be reproduced, distributed or displayed in any other medium than the 11th LIB website. BURIAL LAST NAME FIRST NAME MID NAME SUF HOME ST BATTALION REGIMENT BRIGADE BIRTHDATE AGE DIED A R DYCHE MEM PARK, LONDON KY CREECH PHILLIP GENE LONDON KY 4TH BN 3RD INFANTRY 11TH INFANTRY BDE 8/27/1949 20 3/2/1970 ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND CEMETERY, ABERDEEN, MD MORRISSEY JOHN DENNIS ABERDEEN MD 1ST BN 20TH INFANTRY 11TH INFANTRY BDE 1/2/1947 22 6/30/1969 ADDIE CEMETERY, SYLVA NC PARRIS BOBBY JAMES SYLVA NC 1ST BN 20TH INFANTRY 11TH INFANTRY BDE 10/27/1948 22 10/27/1970 ADULLAM CEMETERY, BERTRAND, NE MATSON WILLMER ARDEN LOOMIS NE 3RD BN 1ST INFANTRY 11TH INFANTRY BDE 7/23/1949 20 3/15/1970 ALBERT CEM, MONTMORENCY CTY MI PYNNONEN MICHAEL JONAS LEWISTON MI 4TH BN 3RD INFANTRY 11TH INFANTRY BDE 2/23/1948 22 3/29/1970 ALL SOULS CEMETERY, VALLEJO, CA GARCIA MARCAS JOSE VALLEJO CA 4TH BN 21ST INFANTRY 11TH INFANTRY BDE 10/28/1949 19 10/17/1969 ALMA RIVERSIDE CEM, ALMA, MI JONES LARRY ALLEN ST LOUIS MI 4TH BN 3RD INFANTRY 11TH INFANTRY BDE 10/15/1948 19 9/6/1968 ALTA MESA MEM PARK, PALO ALTO, CA WALKER CLIFFORD WAYNE MOUNTAIN VIEW CA 4TH BN 3RD INFANTRY 11TH INFANTRY BDE 2/14/1944 24 2/18/1968 ALTUS CEMETERY, ALTUS, OK WABLE SAMUEL LEE ALTUS OK 4TH BN 3RD INFANTRY 11TH INFANTRY BDE 1/12/1950 19 5/12/1969 ANADARKO CEM, ANADARKO, OK SMITH ALBERT JOSEPH ANADARKO OK 4TH BN 3RD INFANTRY 11TH INFANTRY BDE 11/9/1931 37 6/16/1969 ANITOCK CEMETERY, BARRY CO, MO BRUTON
    [Show full text]
  • 1981 Michigan Wolverines Michigan 1981 N O S a E S H T 3 1 H C a O C D a E H R E L H C E B M E H C S O B Lmot, Ich
    State Police divers recover suspected weapon in W ilcox Lake Hartwig trial date scheduled BY KEN VOYLES Village resident, Darcelle Payne, who had f Ronald Hartwig, 32, accused killer of apparently, been approached by Hartwig Stacey Hurrelbrink, 21, will go on trial after the crime. before ^ayne County Circuit Court In other developments the Michigan Judge Michael J. Connors Oct. 13 at 9 State Police crime lab is currently a.m. studying a possible murder weapon . Preliminary proceedings were con­ recovered by an MSP diving team from ducted Thursday at Detroit’s Circuit the east end of Wilcox Lake last Tuesday. Court where the prosecution offered to Divers combed the lake bottom for over drop charges from first degree murder to an hour before recovering a claw ham­ second degree murder against Hartwig. mer, which it is believed was used on Hartwig’s court-appointed lawyer, Hurrelbrink the night of Aug. 22. Patrick Devine, had no comment on the Plymouth’s Acting Police Chief Carl change in charges, but added that he is in Berry said Monday that the MSP lab is the process of discussing the matter with still studying the weapon, but added his client to accept or reject the offer. that "if nothing positive had come up First degree murder is considered on the weapon we would have heard by premeditated, while second degree now.’* murder is considered "with malice’’ but Berry would not comment on where the without premeditation. tip came from concerning the Hartwig was arrested early in the whereabouts of the weapon. Hartwig had morning of Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of Michael "Malcolm" Coleman
    Descendants of Michael "Malcolm" Coleman Prepared by: Thomas N. Oatney Table of Contents Descendants of Michael "Malcolm" Coleman 1 First Generation 1 Second Generation 1 Third Generation 3 Fourth Generation 6 Fifth Generation 15 Sixth Generation 35 Seventh Generation 74 Eighth Generation 116 Ninth Generation 147 Tenth Generation 162 11th Generation 166 Name Index 167 Produced by: Thomas Oatney tom @ oatney . org : 24 Mar 2021 Descendants of Michael "Malcolm" Coleman First Generation 1. Michael "Malcolm" Coleman, son of James Coleman, was born in 1740, died in Feb 1793 in Cottageville, Jackson County, (W)VA at age 53, and was buried in Cottageville Cemetery, Cottageville, Jackson County, WV. Michael married Margaretta Rösch, daughter of Gabriel Rösch and Magdalena, about 1759. Margaretta was born on 2 Oct 1740 in Germany and was buried in Fort Belleville Cemetery, Belleville, Wood County, WV. Children from this marriage were: + 2 M i. John Coleman was born in 1760 in PA and died about 1825 in Wood County, (W)VA about age 65. + 3 F ii. Sarah Margaret Coleman was born in 1763 in Cumberland County, PA, died in 1830 at age 67, and was buried in Fort Belleville Cemetery, Belleville, Wood County, WV. + 4 F iii. Jane Coleman was born on 19 Sep 1773 in Cumberland County, PA and died on 6 Aug 1816 in White County, IL at age 42. 5 M iv. Samuel Coleman was born in 1774, died in 1851 in Meigs County, OH at age 77, and was buried in Sand Hill Cemetery, Long Bottom, Meigs County, OH. Samuel married Jane Roush in 1802.
    [Show full text]
  • Muslim Gravestones in Detroit a Study in Diversity
    Muslim Gravestones in Detroit A Study in Diversity By Ronald R. Stockton Printed in Markers The Journal of the Association of Gravestone Studies Volume XXXIV 2018 pp. 52-85 1 Muslim Gravestones in Detroit Ronald R. Stockton Gravestones can be used to document and explain the exceptional internal diversity of the Muslim community of southeast Michigan. In reality, this is not a single community but a mosaic of diverse communities, diverse in terms of national, cultural, and even religious sub- groupings. While Muslims agree on the five Pillars of the Faith, there is otherwise great variation.1 In that sense, the gravestones and markers in this study are not Islamic stones. They are the stones of Muslims. And Muslims do not fit a single pattern. Perhaps we need to see these sub-communities as ethnic groups, or more precisely religio-ethnic groups. Scholars have offered several definitions of ethnicity. Most refer to a common history and identity, typically linked to a national origin. They mention cultural values, a religious tradition, and a sense of boundaries as to who is in the group and who is not. Christiano et al specify “people who are presumed, by members of the group itself and by outsiders, to have a shared collective origin and history, and a common set of cultural attributes that serve to establish boundaries between the group and the larger society.” Putnam and Campbell focus on “a shared history, legacy of persecution, mass migration, and geographic concentration.” Aswad states such a group has a real or fictive common ancestry, memories of a shared historical past, and a focus on symbolic elements, among them language, religion, physical appearance, or tribal identification.
    [Show full text]
  • JUL 2 0 2007 CLERK Nf COURT SUPREMOF OHIO William D
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO MARK ALBRECHT, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, . Case No.: 07-05 07 V. On Certified Question from the the United States District Court BRIAN TREON, M.D., et al., . for the Southern District of Ohio, Dist. Ct. Case No.: 1:06-CV-274 Defendants-Petitioners. BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE OHIO STATE CORONERS ASSOCIATION AND OHIO STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS Mark D. Tucker (0036855), Counsel of Record John R. Climaco (0011456) [email protected] j rclim(l climacolaw. com C.David Paragas (0043908) David M. Cuppage (0047104) dl)aragas(@bfca.com [email protected] BENESCH, FRIEDLANDER, COPLAN & ARONOFF LLP Scott D. Simpkins (0066775) 88 East Broad Street [email protected] 9th Floor Climaco, Lefkowitz, Peca, Columbus, Ohio 43215-3506 Wilcox & Garofoli Co., LPA (614) 223-9300 55 Public Square, Suite 150 FAX (614) 223-9330 Cleveland, Ohio 44113 Counsel for Amici Curiae Ohio State Coroners (216) 621-8484 Association and Ohio State Medical Association FAX (216) 771-1632 Counsel for Amicus Curiae Cuyahoga County Helen E. Mason (0051967) [email protected] Mark Landes (0027227) Clennont County Prosecutor's Office mlgisaacbrant.com 101 East Main Street David G. Jennings (0040487) Batavia, Ohio 45103 d gj na,i saacbrant. com (513) 732-7585 IsAAc, BRANT, LEDMAN & TEETOR FAX (513) 732-7592 250 East Broad Street, Suite 900 Counselfor Defendants-Pet ioners Columbus, Ohio 43215-3742 (614) 221-2121 Patrick J. Perotti (0005481) FAX (614) 365-9516 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae Sixty-Five Dworken & Bernstein Co., LPA Ohio Counties, County Commissioners 60 South Park Place Association of Ohio, Ohio Association Painesville, Ohio 44077 of Chiefs of Police, Buckeye State (440) 352-3391 Sheriffs'Associatprnr,-a Prosecuting FAX (440) 352-3469 Attorneys Associ tion Counselfor Plaintffs-Respondents FRED (Counsel continued on next page) JUL 2 0 2007 CLERK nF COURT SUPREMOF OHIO William D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historic Designed Landscapes of Syracuse, New York
    (June 1991) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES NW | 6 MULTIPLE PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION FORM This form is for use in documenting multiple property historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Co ilatea aaeh item Ly eiiLcrliiy Li requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. [XI New Submission [ ] Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing The Historic Designed Landscapes of Syracuse, New York B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period of each.) Early National Period, 1785-1840 Romantic Period, 1840-1890 The City Beautiful Movement and Progressive Era, 1893-1930 The Country Place Era, 1890-1930 The Depression Years, 1930-1940 C. Form Prepared by Landscape & Prospect Project Staff: Landscape Architects and Cultural Resource Planners Dudley C. Breed, Jr., principal 23 9 East Water Street Marc J. Morfei, project manager Syracuse, New York 13202 Christine B. Lozner, consultant (315)422-8912 Peter V. Auyer, consultant July 1994 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2020 Lawnotes
    LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW SECTION – STATE BAR OF MICHIGAN TES NO LABOR AND EMPL OYMENT LAWNOTES LAW Volume 30, No. 2 Summer 2020 for certiorari, and that no other religious liberty claim was before TITLE VII PROTECTS the Court. HOMOSEXUAL AND The employers did argue that, when Title VII was passed, dictionaries defined “sex” in binary (i.e., a man and a woman) TRANSGENDER EMPLOYEES biological terms. The employers also argued that it would surprise the drafters of Title VII and the Congress that passed the act to Diane M. Soubly find that the act included protection for homosexual or transgender Butzel Long employees. In a single decision issued in three cases argued together last Even assuming that dictionary definition in 1964, the Court October 8th, the U.S. Supreme Court held on June 15 that Title VII focused on the specific language used in Title VII, which prohibits of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects individual employees from employers from discriminating against an “individual” on the intentional employer discrimination because of the individual’s basis of sex. Rejecting the employers’ position, the Court homosexuality or transgender status. 1 Bostock v. Clayton County, announced: Georgia, 2020 WL 314668. 2 Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote for the Today, we must decide whether an employer can fire six-person majority that also included Chief Justice John Roberts. someone simply for being homosexual or transgender. The employers in all three cases did not dispute that they had The answer is clear. An employer who fires an fired the employees simply for being gay or transgender.
    [Show full text]
  • Jim Price, CCFE, Ccre 248.839.5227 [email protected] Or Ti
    107 Carpenter Drive, Suite 100 Sterling, VA 20164 1.800.645.7700 703.391.8400 Fax: 703.391.8416 www.iccfa.com For Immediate Release For More Information, Please Contact: Jim Price, CCFE, CCrE 248.839.5227 l [email protected] or Tim Hutchison 1.800.645.7700 l [email protected] EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION AWARDS 118 SCHOLARSHIPS TO THE 2020 ICCFA UNIVERSITY IN ATLANTA, GEORGIA; SCHOLARSHIPS CARRIED OVER INTO 2021 STERLING, VA (June 5, 2020) – The International Cemetery, Cremation and Funeral Association (ICCFA) Educational Foundation was able to award 118 scholarships to the 2020 iteration of ICCFA University thanks to generous donors who believe that professional development is important to the well-being of the profession. Scholarship recipients represent ICCFA members from 33 states and Brazil, Canada, Curaçao, Guam, Guatemala, Jamaica and Uruguay, who hold many different positions at funeral homes, cemeteries and industry suppliers. With input from the ICCFA leadership, staff, ICCFA University Deans, public health experts, and membership, the 2020 ICCFA University was cancelled due to the ongoing public health and safety concerns surrounding the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Scholarship recipients will have their 2020 scholarships honored at the 2021 ICCFA University on July 23-28. Below are the scholarship recipients: • Heidi Aarestad, Lakewood Cemetery, Minneapolis, Minnesota • Kitty Alexander, StoneMor, Elizabethon, Tennessee • Mark Anderson, Homecoming Inc., Tempe, Arizona • Carla Birdwell, Glen Oaks Memorial Park, Chico, California
    [Show full text]
  • The News-Sentinel 1950
    The News-Sentinel 1950 Tuesday, January 3, 1950 Orpha Faye Shipley Funeral services were held Monday afternoon in the Moyer-Haupert funeral home in Akron for Mrs. Orpha Faye SHIPLEY, 61, of near Kewanna, who died in an automobile Saturday while enroute to Woodlawn hospital. The Rev. Daniel SLAYBAUGH officiated and burial was made in the Akron cemetery. Mrs. Shipley, a life-long resident of Fulton county, is survived by her husband, Vern SHIPLEY; two brothers, Fred and Jennings GRUBE, of Kewanna, and a half-sister, Mrs. Esther GREENWALD, South Gate, Calif. Lora M. Rupe Mrs. Lora M. RUPE, 78, of Argos, passed away Monday evening in the Parkview Hospital, Plymouth, following a four weeks illness from complications. Mrs. Rupe has been a resident of Argos and vicinity throughout her entire life. She was born Dec. 29, 1871 on a farm west of Argos. Her parents were William and Susan MILLER. In 1890 she was married to William Allen RUPE, who preceded her in death in 1930. Mrs. Rupe was a member of the Argos Church of God. Surviving are a brother, Charles S. MILLER, Battle Creek, Mich.; and three nephews, William T. MILLER, Walkerton, David C. MILLER, Brook, Ind. and Robert W. MILLER, Battle Creek. Funeral services in charge of the Rev. Alvin ROPP, Plymouth assisted by Rev. Mrs. Virginia PLETCHER, Plymouth will be held Thursday 2 p.m. at the Grossman Funeral Home, Argos. Burial will be in the Maple [Grove] cemetery, Argos. The body is at the funeral home where friends may call. Jack LeRoy Hittle Funeral services for Jack LeRoy HITTLE, four-day-old son of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Coa 349240 Rachel Brown V Vhs Of
    If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS RACHEL BROWN, on behalf of herself and all UNPUBLISHED others similarly situated, March 25, 2021 Plaintiff-Appellee, v No. 349240 Wayne Circuit Court VHS OF MICHIGAN, INC., doing business as LC No. 18-007528-CZ DETROIT MEDICAL CENTER, VHS HARPER- HUTZEL HOSPITAL, INC., doing business as HARPER-HUTZEL HOSPITAL, WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY, KNOLLWOOD MEMORIAL PARK CEMETERY ASSOCIATION, and KNOLLWOOD MEMORIAL PARK, Defendants, and VERMEULEN FUNERAL HOMES, INC., doing business as PERRY FUNERAL HOME (WAYNE COUNTY), Defendant-Appellant. RACHEL BROWN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v No. 349251 Wayne Circuit Court VHS OF MICHIGAN, INC. doing business as LC No. 18-007528-CZ DETROIT MEDICAL CENTER, VHS HARPER- HUTZEL HOSPITAL, INC., doing business as HARPER-HUTZEL HOSPITAL, -1- Defendants-Appellants, and VERMEULEN FUNERAL HOMES, INC., doing business as PERRY FUNERAL HOME (WAYNE COUNTY), WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY, KNOLLWOOD MEMORIAL PARK CEMETERY ASSOCIATION, and KNOLLWOOD MEMORIAL PARK, Defendants. Before: O’BRIEN, P.J., and SERVITTO and GLEICHER, JJ. PER CURIAM. In these consolidated matters, defendant Vermeulen Funeral Homes, Inc., doing business as Perry Funeral Home (Wayne County) (“Perry Funeral Home”), appeals by leave granted in Docket No. 349240, and defendants Detroit Medical Center (“DMC”) and VHS Harper-Hutzel Hospital, Inc., doing business as Harper-Hutzel Hospital (“Harper-Hutzel Hospital”), appeal by leave granted in Docket No. 349251. These defendants appeal the trial court’s May 16, 2019 order granting the motion of plaintiff, Rachel Brown, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, for class certification, appointment of a class representative, and appointment of class counsel.
    [Show full text]