RNA Structure and Dynamics: a Base Pairing Perspective
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology xxx (2013) 1e20 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pbiomolbio Review RNA structure and dynamics: A base pairing perspective Sukanya Halder a, Dhananjay Bhattacharyya b,* a Biophysics division, Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, 1/AF, Bidhannagar, Kolkata 700 064, India b Computational Science division, Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, 1/AF, Bidhannagar, Kolkata 700 064, India article info abstract Article history: RNA is now known to possess various structural, regulatory and enzymatic functions for survival of Available online xxx cellular organisms. Functional RNA structures are generally created by three-dimensional organization of small structural motifs, formed by base pairing between self-complementary sequences from different Keywords: parts of the RNA chain. In addition to the canonical WatsoneCrick or wobble base pairs, several non- Non-canonical base pair canonical base pairs are found to be crucial to the structural organization of RNA molecules. They RNA secondary structure appear within different structural motifs and are found to stabilize the molecule through long-range Structural characterization of non-canonical intra-molecular interactions between basic structural motifs like double helices and loops. These base base pairs Detection of non-canonical base pairs pairs also impart functional variation to the minor groove of A-form RNA helices, thus forming anchoring site for metabolites and ligands. Non-canonical base pairs are formed by edge-to-edge hydrogen bonding interactions between the bases. A large number of theoretical studies have been done to detect and analyze these non-canonical base pairs within crystal or NMR derived structures of different functional RNA. Theoretical studies of these isolated base pairs using ab initio quantum chemical methods as well as molecular dynamics simulations of larger fragments have also established that many of these non- canonical base pairs are as stable as the canonical WatsoneCrick base pairs. This review focuses on the various structural aspects of non-canonical base pairs in the organization of RNA molecules and the possible applications of these base pairs in predicting RNA structures with more accuracy. Ó 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Contents 1. Introduction . ................................................. 00 2. Studies on RNA structures . ................................................. 00 3. RNA structural organization through base pairing interactions . ..................... 00 4. Tools for RNA structure analysis . ............................................ 00 5. Structure and stability of non-canonical base pairs . .................................... 00 6. Structural organization of RNA: importance of non-canonical base pairs . ..................... 00 7. Functional importance of non-canonical base pairs . .................................... 00 8. Non-canonical base pairs in RNA structure prediction . .................................... 00 9. Structural stabilities of double helices containing non-canonical base pairs . ..................... 00 10. Conclusion . ................................................. 00 Acknowledgement . ....................... 00 References................................................................. ................................ ....................... 00 1. Introduction For years, RNA has been considered to be an intermediate stage between DNA and proteins. Until recently, RNA was only of in- * Corresponding author. Tel.: þ91 33 2337 0379x2252, fax: þ91 33 2337 4637. E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected] terest in its role as an intermediary in transcription and trans- (D. Bhattacharyya). lation, where genetic information of DNA is transferred to 0079-6107/$ e see front matter Ó 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2013.07.003 Please cite this article in press as: Halder, S., Bhattacharyya, D., RNA structure and dynamics: A base pairing perspective, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2013.07.003 2 S. Halder, D. Bhattacharyya / Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology xxx (2013) 1e20 messenger RNA (mRNA) through transcription and then translated several other purposes like house keeping, stress response, into protein with the help of transfer RNA (tRNA) and ribosomal virulence, quorum sensing etc. RNA (rRNA). However, it is now well established that commonly known 2. Studies on RNA structures functional RNAs like mRNA, tRNA and rRNA take additional re- sponsibility in post transcriptional regulation and translation The discovery of catalytic activity in RNA has prompted processes within the cellular machinery and thereby regulate serious attempts to decipher the mechanisms of their assembly gene expression levels. In the past few decades, RNA has been into functional native states starting from linear strands. Since shown to exhibit several other crucial functions also. The most the release of crystal structures of the ribosomal subunits in important one is their enzymatic activities similar to endonu- 2000e2001, determination of RNA structures have gained pace clease, nucleotidyltransferase, phosphodiesterase, phospho- remarkably, thanks to the advancements of various chemical and transferase and acid phosphatase (Zaug et al., 1983,1984,1986; biophysical methods. Elucidation of large and complex RNA Zaug and Cech, 1986a,b). Catalytic activity of Tetrahymena 26S structures like group I introns, riboswitches, RNA components of rRNA intervening sequence was first established with its self- both A-type and B-type RNaseP etc by X-ray crystallography has splicing role (Kruger et al., 1982). Endonuclease activity is also been possible. Improvements in techniques for the synthesis, imparted by the RNA component of RNaseP (Guerriertakada purification, crystallization and derivatization of large RNAs, as et al., 1983; Krasilnikov et al., 2003; Kazantsev et al., 2005). well as the development of advanced software, have been crucial This ribonuclease is among the first catalytic RNAs discovered for this advancement. In recent years nuclear magnetic reso- and is one of the only two known ribozymes conserved in all nance (NMR) spectroscopic technique has also improved signif- taxonomic kingdoms (Krasilnikov et al., 2004). Bacterial RNaseP icantly for structure determination of large macromolecules. can catalyze the hydrolysis of tRNA precursor by cleaving a Developments in other physical and chemical methods like phosphodiester bond even in the absence of protein-part in vitro single-particle cryo-electron microscopy, mass spectrometry and and results in 50-phosphorylated mature tRNA (Krasilnikov et al., structure-specific chemicals and enzymes have also helped in 2003; Kazantsev et al., 2005). Studies of the non-coding regions this exponential growth of structural data in the Protein Data of mRNA, or aptamers, have revealed their ability of recognition Bank (PDB) (Bernstein et al., 1977; Berman et al., 2000). The and binding to specific target molecules for genetic control determination of various RNA structures, such as the hammer- (Mironov et al., 2002; Szostak, 2002). These non-coding regions head ribozyme (Scott et al., 1995a,b), SRP RNA (Zwieb et al., 1999) assist in the signal transduction pathway and are required for and the 5S, 16S and 23S RNAs of ribosome (Ban et al. 2000)has translational regulation by sensing the level of a given metabo- greatly increased our knowledge of RNA folds and the three- lite. Another type of biotechnologically important gene regula- dimensional organization of RNA chains (Ferre-D’Amare et al., tory non-coding RNA is riboswitch, which are found in bacteria 1998; Batey et al., 1999; Hermann and Patel, 1999). Collectively, and fungi and not in higher organisms, making it target for cure these structures provide a large amount of information about in human. They can fold into unique shapes and have the ability RNA structural motifs (Moore, 1999). Similar exponential growth to shift its conformation to a different structure in presence or in number of crystal structures of proteins is also taking place in absence of specificmetabolite(Nudler and Mironov, 2004; the PDB. Considering the need of classification of these proteins, Vitreschak et al., 2004; Tucker and Breaker, 2005; Batey, 2006) there are a number of methods available, such as SCOP (Murzin for modulating protein synthesis process (Nahvi et al., 2002; et al., 1995; Hubbard et al., 1997), FSSP (Holm and Sander, Winkler et al., 2002a,b). Another functional aspect of RNA mol- 1997), Pisces (Wang and Dunbrack, 2005), BIPA (Lee and ecules is their role in peptide bond formation mediated by the 20- Blundell, 2009) etc. These methods can classify a protein struc- hydroxyl group of the 30-terminal ribose sugars of peptidyl tRNA ture based on its structural class, source organism, secondary (Das et al., 1999; Dorner et al. 2003; Strobel and Cochrane, 2007). structure content, resolution, etc. In a similar manner, it is also Recently, larger rRNA subunits of ribosomes in Eubacteria as necessary to organize the available RNA structures to determine well as plants and animals have been shown to possess chap- different structureefunction relationships. erone activity to assist protein folding (Samanta et al., 2008). The building blocks of nucleic acid structures