Indonesian Hijriah Calendar Unification Urgency in the Perspective of Maqasid Sunnah Nabawiyah and Maqasid Shariah : a Qualitative Literature Review
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology Vol. 29, No.4, (2020), pp. 3095 – 3110 Indonesian Hijriah Calendar Unification Urgency in the Perspective of Maqasid Sunnah Nabawiyah and Maqasid Shariah : A Qualitative Literature Review Abdul Mufid1*, Agus Purwanto2, Ahmad Asrof Fitri3, Rohmad Adi Yulianto4, Masduki Asbari5, Fatrilia Rasyi Radita6, Yoyok Cahyono7 1Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Khozinatul Ulum Blora, Indonesia 25Pelita Harapan University, Indonesia 3Islamic Institute of AL-AZIS, Indonesia 4Universitas Islam As-Syafiiyah, Indonesia 56STMIK Insan Pembangunan 7Universitas Pramita Indonesia, Indonesia *Cooresponding Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT This study discusses the principle of unifying the Islamic calendar in the perspective of the maqasid sunah nabawiyah and the maqasid shariah. This study aims to explore maqasid sunah nabawiyah and maqasid shariah on the unification project of the Hijri calendar in the Indonesian context. Questions to be answered include the level of need for integrated or unified calendar ownership in Indonesia. In the Indonesian context there are three views. First, the school of pessimism. Second, the school of optimism. Third, the middle school. For schools of pessimism, it is assumed that making a world almanac is like a longing for the moon.Contrary to the school of pessimism, the school of optimism. According to this school, Indonesian Muslims must be optimistic and must strive to unify the Hijri calendar. Furthermore, the school is looking at that the unification of the calendar, both local and global, is equally important. If it can be done at once, it will be efficient and meaningful. This study is in the form of a literature study with the approach of the maqasid sunahnabawiyah and the maqasid shariah. The results of the study showed that based on analysis of maqasid sunah nabawiyah and maqasid shariah, the need for a single calendar in the Indonesian context did not reach the emergency level (primary). Because without an integrated Hijri calendar, even Muslims (specifically) in Indonesia and citizens (in general) continue to live in harmony and peace, not to cause chaos and chaos . The implications of this research are expected to be leaders of cross-mass organizations in Indonesia to be encouraged in facing all forms of progress in unifying the Islamic calendar. Keywords: Maqasid Shariah , Maqasid Sunah Nabawiyah, Calendar Unification INTRODUCTION Thought pulled in Hijri calendar unifikatif born in response to the problem inconsistency calendar system used by Muslims today. This situation then results in differences in the implementation of Muslim worship, such as Ramadan fasting, Eid al-Fitr, Eid al-Adha and so on . But the emergence of thoughts about the unification of the Hijri calendar is not necessarily a solution to the problem in the midst of Muslims, many times international meetings are held but there is no agreement, various responses emerge at the theoretical and practical level, the pros and cons also adorn the concept offer the unification given (Rahman Fitra 2018, 360) . Calendar is very important for humans, because it is a tracking system, regulator and time divider. For Muslims, a calendar is very important . Many Muslim worship services are related to ISSN: 2005-4238 IJAST 3095 Copyright ⓒ 2020 SERSC International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology Vol. 29, No.4, (2020), pp. 3095 – 3110 the calendar, such as Ramadan fasting , Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha celebrations, as well as the implementation of the pilgrimage. Muslims throughout the world in the month of Ramadan, Shawal, and zulhijah often experience uncertainty about when the beginning and end of fasting. The discourse is often a debate on the issue of determining first month Kamariah in the Islamic world in general and in Indonesia in particular is debate among proponents of the hisab and rukyat method on one side and debate between bearers of ideas of unification calendar Hijriah global and idea’s pioneer unification calendar Hijriah national and regional the other side. Adherents of the hisab and rukyat methods each feel that the method is the most valid shar'i and in accordance with the principles in astronomy. At a certain level, both methods still leave problems unresolved and often controversial. In Indonesia, the method, for example, is still divided into two large poles; wujudul hilal and hisab hilal visibilation. Wujudul hilal requires the entry of a new month Hijriah on two things, namely the occurrence of conjunctions before the sunset of the sun (ijtima 'qabl al-ghuru b ), and at the time of setting the disk of the moon on the horizon is above the horizon (the new moon has come into being). This is what is used by Muhammadiyah in its system as stated in the Muhabadiyah Guidelines ( Muhammadiyah Council and PP. Muhammadiyah 2009, 78). Meanwhile the of rukyat in addition to requiring ijtima 'qabl al-ghurub , the entry of the new month Hijriah is also based on the position of the new moon that may be seen. That is, the reality beginning of a new month Hijriah based on the appearance of the new moon (Azhari 2007, 1 10 ; Ichtijanto 1981, 99-100 ) .The system hilal visibilitation is then spawned a variety of criteria the visibility of the new moon. The diversity of the crescent visibility criteria and not there is agreement about hilal visibility criteria that will be used in Indonesia could be one reason for followers to reject hisabimkanrukyat wujudul hilal. On the other hand, adherents of imkanrukyat assume that criteria wujudul hilal are criteria that can not be proven scientific empirical. Rukyat methods in some cases also led to controversy that no less serious in Indonesia. The witness of the observation of the new moon in Cakung at the beginning of the month of Ramadan 1433 H is the most recent controversial case that occurred in the beginning of the Islamic month in Indonesia. On the one hand, the testimony of the observed new moon like this regarded as valid in view of jurisprudence as an observer reported by fair and conducting under oath. That is, as if it were as if there was no reason to reject the witness' observation of the new moon in that condition. However, on the other hand, the testimony is considered not to meet scientific criteria in modern astronomy. The inaccuracy of hisab system used by observers, errors in determining the position of the new moon, the position of the new moon is still below the threshold of observation of the new moon in the criteria of new moon visibility in Indonesia and in the international world and there is no empirical evidence of the observation of the new moon at that time because the report states that the new moon be some reason for not receiving ter report a death hilal in Cakung. Debate on the calendar unification Hijriah global and national also be a discourse that is not clear at what point will deal starting. Some figures offer calendar enforcement Hijriah could unify global to regional and global calendar, while others offer thingking to unify calendar Hijriah national before heading global unify. ISSN: 2005-4238 IJAST 3096 Copyright ⓒ 2020 SERSC International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology Vol. 29, No.4, (2020), pp. 3095 – 3110 There is some previous literature related to the unification of the Hijri calendar. The literature here is classified by year of publication. First, research published in 2020, included: a). paper which is written by FF Hasib, ADB Nurdiansyah, and YR Setiawan with the title The Impact of Ecotourism Mangrove on Welfare from the Perspective of Maqasid al-Sharia (Hasib, Nurdiansyah, and Setiawan 2020, 502-12) . b). article written by Ahmad Ainul Yaqin with the title Opportunities and Challenges of the International Islamic Calendar Mohammad Ilyas (Ainul Yaqin 2020, 3 2-51 ) . c). According Novi Sopwan and Abu Dzarrin al-Hamidy entitled Implications Criteria Hilal Visibility Against Recommendation Jakarta 2017 Hijri calendar in Indonesia (Sopwan and al-Hamidy 2020, 52-73) . d). Paper written by Siti Muslifah with The title Efforts Addressing Differences Determining Start Month Qamariyah in Indonesia (Muslifah 2020, 74-100) . To two, paper published in 2019, include: a). Mohammad Abdullah's research entitled Reflection of Maqasid al-Shari'ah in the classical Fiqh al-Awqa f (Abdullah 2019) . b). paper written by Ibrahim Jamiu entitled Maqā S id al-Shariah and Effects of Their Negligence on Religious Extremism: A casestudy of Boko Haram of Nigeria (Jamiu 2019, 68 -80 ) . c). Syamsul Anwar's writings with the title Maqasid Sharia Review of the Global Islamic Calendar (Anwar 2019, 205 -220 ) . d). Paper written by Abdul Mufid with the title Unification of the International Hijri Calendar in the Perspective of Yusuf al- Qaradawi (Mufid 2019, 71-83) . e). Ahmad Fadholi's writings titled Acceptability of the Draft New Criteria for Determination of the Hijri Calendar According to Falak Experts in Indonesia (Fadholi 2019, 101-14). Third, articles published in 2018 include: a). A article written by Hanan Sari and Muhammad Abu al-Lais al-Khair Abadi with the title Tatawwur 'Ilm Maqasid al-Syariah' Ibara al- Tarikh al-Islami (Sari and al-Khair Abadi 2018, 35-49) . b). Paper written by Abdul Bari and Ahmad Akram with the title Maqasid al-Sunah al-Nabawiyah Ghair al-Tasyri'iyah (Bari and Akram 2018, 107-127) . c). A article written by Nawawi Tabrani with the title Fahm al-Sunah al-Nabawiyah fi Daui Qawa'id al-Maqasid al-Syar'iyah (Tabrani 2018) . d). Article written by Abdul Qoyum with the title Framework and the Development of Islamic Finance Products: The Case of Indonesia (Qoyum 2018, 169-88) . e). Paper written by M. Abdullah with the title Waqf, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Maqasid al-Shariah (Abdullah 2018, 158-172) .